Lichtenstein

列支敦士登
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:40年来,Lichtenstein修补术一直是“开放式”腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)的代名词。然而,国际指南表明,后网状物放置可产生有利的生物力学,并降低神经相关慢性疼痛的风险。此外,局部麻醉药的使用已被证明可以减少术后疼痛和并发症的风险.开放式经直肌腹膜前/开放式腹膜前(TREPP/OPP)修复将后网放置与局部麻醉剂的使用相结合,因此可能是原发性腹股沟疝的理想修复。使用腹部核心健康质量协作(ACHQC)注册表,我们比较了开放的前网和开放的后网修复。
    方法:我们在ACHQC中对2012年至2022年期间接受开放式IHR的患者进行了倾向评分匹配分析。1:1最佳匹配后,TREPP/OPP和Lichtenstein队列均平衡,每组451名参与者.结果包括患者报告的生活质量(QoL),疝气复发,和术后阿片类药物的使用。
    结果:在30天的EuraHSQoL评分中,在TREPP/OPP后观察到改善(OR0.558[0.408,0.761];p=0.001),差异持续到1年(OR0.588[0.346,0.994];p=0.047)。在TREPP/OPP队列中,30天随访时患者报告的阿片类药物使用显著降低(OR0.31[0.20,0.48];p<0.001)。在Lichtenstein修复队列中,手术部位发生的30天频率显着升高(OR0.22[0.06-0.61];p=0.007)。1年时疝复发风险差异无统计学意义,或术后出血率,周围神经损伤,DVT,或UTI。
    结论:我们的分析表明,在患者报告的QoL和减少阿片类药物使用的开放式腹股沟疝修补术中,后网片放置(TREPP/OPP)优于前网片放置(Lichtenstein)。
    The Lichtenstein repair has been synonymous with \"open\" inguinal hernia repair (IHR) for 40 years. However, international guidelines have suggested that posterior mesh placement results in advantageous biomechanics and reduced risk of nerve-related chronic pain. Additionally, the use of local anesthetics has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and complication risks. An open transrectus preperitoneal/open preperitoneal (TREPP/OPP) repair combines posterior mesh placement with the use of local anesthetic and as such could be the ideal repair for primary inguinal hernia. Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry, we compared open anterior mesh with open posterior mesh repairs.
    We performed a propensity score matched analysis of patients undergoing open IHR between 2012 and 2022 in the ACHQC. After 1:1 optimal matching, both the TREPP/OPP and Lichtenstein cohorts were balanced with 451 participants in each group. Outcomes included patient-reported quality of life (QoL), hernia recurrence, and postoperative opioid use.
    Improvement was seen after TREPP/OPP in EuraHS QoL score at 30 days (OR 0.558 [0.408, 0.761]; p = 0.001), and the difference persisted at 1 year (OR 0.588 [0.346, 0.994]; p = 0.047). Patient-reported opioid use at 30-day follow-up was significantly lower in the TREPP/OPP cohort (OR 0.31 [0.20, 0.48]; p < 0.001). 30-day frequency of surgical-site occurrences was significantly higher in the Lichtenstein repair cohort (OR 0.22 [0.06-0.61]; p = 0.007). There were no statistically significant differences in hernia recurrence risk at 1 year, or rates of postoperative bleeding, peripheral nerve injury, DVTs, or UTIs.
    Our analysis demonstrates a benefit of posterior mesh placement (TREPP/OPP) over anterior mesh placement (Lichtenstein) in open inguinal hernia repair in patient-reported QoL and reduced opioid use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝的开放式网片修补术是可以接受的,可以在局部麻醉(LA)下进行。由于各种原因,包括安全问题,BMI(体重指数)高的个人通常被排除在LA维修之外。研究了具有不同BMI组的个体中单侧腹股沟疝(UIH)的开放修复。使用LA体积和手术时间(LO)作为终点研究其安全性。还评估了手术疼痛和患者满意度。
    方法:总共研究了438名成年患者,排除了体重不足的患者,那些需要任何额外的术中镇痛的人,多个程序,或数据不完整的记录。手术疼痛,患者满意度,从临床和手术记录的现有数据中回顾性研究了LO和LA体积。
    结果:主要是男性人群(男性占93.2%),年龄范围为17-94岁,在60-69岁年龄段达到峰值。BMI范围为19-39kg/m2,BMI高于正常值62.8%。LO为13-100分钟(平均37分钟{SD=12}),每个患者使用45ml的平均LA体积(SD=11)。在BMI组中,LO(P=0.168)和患者满意度(P=0.388)无显著差异。尽管LA体积(P=0.011)和疼痛评分(P<0.001)显示出统计学上的显着差异,这些似乎没有临床相关性.在每个BMI组中,超过90%的人经历了轻度或无疼痛,并且在整个人群中只有一名患者报告了严重的疼痛。总的来说,在所有BMI组中,每位患者所需的LA体积都很低,并且剂量是安全的,其中有相当大比例(89%)的患者满意度评估为他们的经验≥90/100。
    结论:与BMI无关,LA修复是安全且耐受性良好的。BMI不是将肥胖/超重个体排除在LA修复之外的可行原因。
    BACKGROUND: Open mesh repair of inguinal hernia is acceptable and can be performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Individuals with high BMI (Body Mass Index) have often been excluded from LA repairs for varying reasons including safety concerns. Open repair of unilateral inguinal hernia (UIH) amongst individuals with different BMI groups was studied. Its safety profile was investigated using LA volume and length of operation (LO) as endpoints. Operative pain and patient satisfaction were also evaluated.
    METHODS: A total of 438 adult patients were studied having excluded underweight patients, those requiring any additional intra-operative analgesia, multiple procedures, or records with incomplete data. Operative pain, patient satisfaction, LO and LA volume were retrospectively studied from the existing data from clinical and operative notes.
    RESULTS: It was a predominantly male population (93.2% males) with an age range of 17-94 years peaking in the 60-69 years age group. BMI ranged 19-39 kg/m2 with BMI above normal at 62.8%. LO was 13-100 minutes (average 37 mins {SD = 12}) utilising an average LA volume of 45 ml (SD = 11) per patient. Across BMI groups, no significant difference in LO (P = 0.168) or patient satisfaction (P = 0.388) was seen. Although LA volume (P = 0.011) and pain score (P<0.001) demonstrated statistically significant differences, these did not appear to be clinically relevant. Over 90% in each BMI group experienced mild or no pain and with severe pain reported in only one patient in the entire population. Overall, LA volume required per patient was low and dosage was safe in all BMI groups with significant proportion (89%) of patients evaluated for satisfaction rating their experience ≥ 90 out of 100.
    CONCLUSIONS: LA repair is safe and well tolerated irrespective of BMI. BMI is not a viable reason for exclusion of obese/overweight individuals from LA repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景腹股沟疝修补术是世界上最常见的普通外科手术之一。近年来,合成网片和腹腔镜修复的引入彻底改变了腹股沟疝手术。腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修复术现在被认为是一种成熟的手术,并发症少,住院时间短,复发少。TAPP方法可以很好地了解腹股沟解剖结构,并更好地了解囊中的内容。与完全腹膜外(TEP)修复相比,与TAPP修复相关的学习曲线要少得多。这项研究的目的是评估TAPP修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性,住院,并发症,和复发率。方法自2019年3月1日至2021年2月28日,共纳入60例年龄25~70岁的腹股沟疝患者。进行了术前麻醉评估,所有患者均接受知情书面同意.在所有情况下,TAPP程序均使用聚丙烯网进行,手术由一名拥有超过五年腹腔镜经验的外科医生进行。结果纳入研究的患者总数为60例。所有患者均为男性。患者的平均±标准差(SD)年龄为54.6±11.4岁。单侧原发性腹股沟疝46例(76.6%),8例(13.3%)复发,6例(10%)的主要双侧病例。单侧腹股沟疝手术时间平均±SD为59.1±15.7分钟,双侧疝,这是83.5±12.6分钟。平均住院时间为3.6±1.5天。阴囊肿胀是7例(11.6%)的常见并发症,手术部位感染(SSI)三个(5%),网状感染在两个(3.3%),两个尿潴留(3.3%),和慢性疼痛之一(1.6%)。没有发现复发。结论经腹腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝是一种非常有效的手术,学习曲线短,并发症发生率低。住院时间少了,复发率非常低。
    Background Inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest general surgical procedures performed all over the world. The introduction of synthetic mesh and laparoscopic repair has revolutionized inguinal hernia surgery in the recent past. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair is now considered a well-established procedure with minimal complications and short hospital stay and less recurrence. The TAPP approach gives a good view of the inguinal anatomy and a better understanding of the sac contents. The learning curve associated with TAPP repair is much less as compared to total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of TAPP repair for inguinal hernia in terms of the duration of surgery, hospital stay, complications, and recurrence rate. Method From March 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021, a total of 60 patients with inguinal hernias between ages 25 and 70 years were included in the study. A preoperative anesthesia assessment was done, and informed written consent was taken from all patients. The TAPP procedure was performed with polypropylene mesh in all cases, and surgery was performed by a surgeon with more than five years of laparoscopic experience. Results The total number of patients included in the study was 60. All patients were male. The mean±standard deviation (SD) age of the patients was 54.6±11.4 years. Unilateral primary inguinal hernia was present in 46 (76.6%) cases, recurrent in eight (13.3%) cases, and primary bilateral in six (10%) cases. The mean±SD duration of surgery for unilateral inguinal hernia was 59.1±15.7 minutes, and for bilateral hernia, it was 83.5±12.6 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3.6±1.5 days. Scrotal swelling was noted as a common complication in seven (11.6%) cases, surgical site infection (SSI) in three (5%), mesh infection in two (3.3%), urinary retention in two (3.3%), and chronic pain in one (1.6%). No recurrence was noted. Conclusion Transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia is a very effective procedure with a short learning curve and minimal complication rate. The hospital stay is less, and recurrence is very low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:Lichtenstein疝修补术一直被视为腹股沟疝修补术的金标准。不幸的是,这种修复通常与慢性疼痛有关,高达10-35%。因此,已经开发了几种新技术,例如经腹股沟腹膜前补片(TIPP)和内窥镜全腹膜外(TEP)技术。一些研究表明,与Lichtenstein疝修补术相比,TIPP和TEP的有益结果;然而,在比较TIPP和TEP程序时,几乎没有公布结果。本研究旨在评估TIPP与TEP技术腹股沟疝修补术后的结果。
    方法:在2015年至2020年之间进行了一项单中心随机对照试验。共纳入300例单侧腹股沟疝患者,并随机接受TIPP或TEP技术。主要结果是慢性疼痛(定义为最后3个月后的任何疼痛)和生活质量,在12个月时使用卡罗莱纳州舒适量表(CCS)进行评估。次要结果是:伤口感染,伤口感觉减退,复发,30天内重新接纳,再操作。
    结果:共300例患者被随机分组(每组150例)。经过12个月的随访,我们观察到术后慢性腹股沟疼痛明显减少,劳累时的慢性疼痛,伤口感觉减退,与TIPP程序相比,TEP后的伤口感染。生活质量无显著差异,重新操作,复发率,并观察到30天内再入院。
    结论:我们表明,与TIPP程序相比,TEP程序具有良好的结果,减少术后疼痛和伤口并发症,而两组的复发率和再手术率相等.
    The Lichtenstein hernioplasty has long been seen as the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Unfortunately, this repair is often associated with chronic pain, up to 10-35%. Therefore, several new techniques have been developed, such as the transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) and the endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Several studies showed beneficial results of the TIPP and TEP compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty; however, little is published on the outcome when comparing the TIPP and TEP procedures. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the TIPP vs the TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair.
    A single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out between 2015 and 2020. A total of 300 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomized to the TIPP- or TEP technique. Primary outcome was chronic pain (defined as any pain following the last 3 months) and quality of life, assessed with Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were: wound infection, wound hypoesthesia, recurrence, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation.
    A total of 300 patients were randomized (150 per group). After a follow-up of 12 months, we observed significantly less postoperative chronic groin pain, chronic pain at exertion, wound hypoesthesia, and wound infections after the TEP when compared to the TIPP procedure. No significant differences in quality of life, reoperations, recurrence rate, and readmission within 30 days were observed.
    We showed that the TEP has a favorable outcome compared to the TIPP procedure, leading to less postoperative pain and wound complications, whereas recurrence rates and reoperations were equal in both the groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于腹股沟疝管理的最新国际指南建议修复后短期康复。然而,外科医生的建议可能有所不同。这项研究的目的是概述Lichtenstein和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术细分的文献中当前的康复建议。
    在这篇系统综述中,我们在2021年8月搜索了3个数据库,以确定腹股沟疝修补术的研究,并提供关于术后康复建议的声明.结果是按日常活动细分的疗养建议,光工作,重型起重,和体育。
    总共,91项研究符合资格标准,50和58项研究报告了Lichtenstein和腹腔镜修复后的康复建议,分别。患者接受了广泛的康复建议。共有34项Lichtenstein研究和35项腹腔镜研究建议尽快恢复日常活动。在Lichtenstein维修之后,指示患者在中位数0天后恢复轻度工作(四分位距(IQR)0-0),42天后重吊(IQR14-42),和运动后7天(IQR0-29)。腹腔镜手术后,指示患者在中位0天后恢复轻度工作(IQR0-0),14天后重吊(IQR10-28),和运动后12天(IQR7-23)。
    这项研究揭示了广泛的康复建议,取决于腹股沟疝修补术后的活动水平,这可能反映了这一领域缺乏高质量的证据。
    The most recent international guideline on inguinal hernia management recommends a short convalescence after repair. However, surgeons\' recommendations may vary. The objective of this study was to give an overview of the current convalescence recommendations in the literature subdivided on the Lichtenstein and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.
    In this systematic review, three databases were searched in August 2021 to identify studies on inguinal hernia repairs with a statement about postoperative convalescence recommendations. The outcome was convalescence recommendations subdivided on daily activities, light work, heavy lifting, and sport.
    In total, 91 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, and 50 and 58 studies reported about convalescence recommendations after Lichtenstein and laparoscopic repairs, respectively. Patients were instructed with a wide range of convalescence recommendations. A total of 34 Lichtenstein studies and 35 laparoscopic studies recommended resumption of daily activities as soon as possible. Following Lichtenstein repairs, the patients were instructed to resume light work after median 0 days (interquartile range (IQR) 0-0), heavy lifting after 42 days (IQR 14-42), and sport after 7 days (IQR 0-29). Following laparoscopic procedures, the patients were instructed to resume light work after median 0 days (IQR 0-0), heavy lifting after 14 days (IQR 10-28), and sport after 12 days (IQR 7-23).
    This study revealed a broad spectrum of convalescence recommendations depending on activity level following inguinal hernia repair, which likely reflects a lack of high-quality evidence within this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹股沟疝修补术中间接疝囊的管理长期以来一直是普通外科医生争论的话题。尽管疝囊高位结扎术(HL)在腹股沟疝手术中是一个历史悠久的概念,非结扎/内陷越来越受欢迎。这项研究旨在比较接受Lichtenstein网状疝修补术(LMH)的患者的疝囊结扎术和内陷的效果。另一个目的是调查两组的疝缺损大小与术后早期疼痛之间的可能关联。
    这项前瞻性随机研究包括在脊髓麻醉下接受择期LMH的腹股沟斜疝患者。根据欧洲疝协会(EHS)标准对患者进行分类,并随机分为两组,HL和非HL/内陷。术后6、12和24h疼痛水平,7天,使用十点视觉模拟量表(VAS)比较1年。此外,在术后第一年检查复发。术后并发症,住院时间,排水管使用,和手术次数作为次要结局进行评估.这项研究在www注册。
    政府。(clinicaltrials.govID号为:NCT05308251)。
    在2020年1月至2021年1月期间,共108名患者中有93名纳入研究(HL组n=44,非HL组n=49)。两组之间的人口统计学特征具有可比性。HL组术后6小时和12小时的平均VAS评分明显高于对照组(分别为p<0.05和p=0.036)。虽然EHS1和EHS2疝气组之间的疼痛水平没有差异(p>0.05),EHS3疝患者的VAS评分明显高于结扎组(均p<0.05)。在中位18个月的随访中,未结扎的复发率和并发症率不受影响。
    在接受LMH的患者中,疝囊内陷优于结扎术,因为它降低了术后早期疼痛水平而不影响修复完整性。因此,我们建议避免结扎疝囊,尤其是在EHS3患者谁接受LMH。
    Management of the indirect hernial sac in inguinal hernia repairs has long been a subject of debate among general surgeons. Although hernial sac high ligation (HL) is a time-honored concept in groin hernia surgery, non-ligation/invagination is gaining popularity. This study was intended to compare the effects of hernia sac ligation and invagination in patients undergoing Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH). Another aim was to investigate the possible association between the hernial defect size and postoperative early pain in both groups.
    Patients with indirect inguinal hernia undergoing elective LMH under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were classified according to European Hernia Society (EHS) criteria and were randomized into two groups, HL and non-HL/invagination. Postoperative pain levels at 6, 12, and 24 h, 7 days, and 1 year were compared using a ten-point visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, recurrence was examined in the postoperative first year. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, drain use, and surgery times were evaluated as secondary outcomes. This study was registered at www.
    gov . (The clinicaltrials.gov ID number is: NCT05308251).
    Ninety-three out of a total of 108 patients were included in the study between January 2020 and January 2021 (HL group n = 44, non-HL group n = 49). Demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. Mean VAS scores were significantly higher in the HL group at 6 and 12 h postoperatively (p < 0.05 and p = 0.036 respectively). While there was no difference in pain levels between the groups in EHS 1 and EHS 2 hernias (p > 0.05 for all), VAS scores were significantly higher in the ligation group in EHS 3 hernias (p < 0.05 for all). Recurrence and complication rates were unaffected with non-ligation at a median 18 months follow-up.
    Hernia sac invagination was superior to ligation in patients who underwent LMH, as it reduced early postoperative pain levels without disturbing repair integrity. We therefore recommend that ligating the hernial sac be avoided, especially in EHS 3 patients who undergo LMH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在开放式Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)中使用胶水作为网状固定器已越来越受欢迎,以减少复发和术后并发症。这项荟萃分析旨在提供最新的综述,以比较原发性开放LichtensteinIHR中的胶水与缝线固定。
    PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,在2021年6月之前,对Springer进行了系统搜索,以比较开放LichtensteinIHR中胶水固定与缝线固定的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是早期(1年)和晚期复发(5年或更长时间)。次要结果是手术时间,术后血肿和血清肿,和慢性疼痛在1年。
    共包括17个RCT,其中有3150个疝(胶水n=1582,缝线n=1568)。只有三项研究报告了晚期复发。胶水固定与手术时间较短相关(MD-4.17,95%CI-4.82,-3.52;p<0.001,血肿形成的发生率较低(OR0.51,95%CI0.32,0.81;p=0.004)。术后血清肿无显著差异(OR0.72,95%CI0.35,1.49;p=0.38),1年后慢性疼痛(OR1.10,95%CI0.73,1.65;p=0.65),早期复发(OR1.11,95%CI0.45,2.76;p=0.81,I2=0%),和晚期复发(OR1.23,95%CI0.59,2.59;p=0.59,I2=0%)。
    在开放性LichtensteinIHR患者中,胶水和缝线固定的早期和晚期复发具有可比性。与缝线固定相比,胶水固定的手术时间更短,血肿形成更少。慢性疼痛和血清肿形成相当。更多的RCT应该报告长期结果。
    The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date review to compare glue versus suture fixation in primary open Lichtenstein IHR.
    PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer were systematically searched till June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR. Primary outcomes were early (at 1 year) and late recurrence (5 years or more). Secondary outcomes were the length of operation, postoperative haematoma and seroma, and chronic pain at 1 year.
    A total of 17 RCTs with 3150 hernias (glue n = 1582, suture n = 1568) were included. Only three studies reported late recurrence. Glue fixation was associated with shorter operative duration (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 4.82, - 3.52; p < 0.001 and a lower incidence of haematoma formation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32, 0.81; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35, 1.49; p = 0.38), chronic pain after 1 year (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73, 1.65; p = 0.65), early recurrence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45, 2.76; p = 0.81, I2 = 0%), and late recurrence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.59, 2.59; p = 0.59, I2 = 0%).
    Early and late recurrence were comparable between glue and suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR patients. Glue fixation had shorter operating time and lower haematoma formation than suture fixation. Chronic pain and seroma formation were comparable. More RCTs should report long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迄今为止,Lichtenstein无张力网片疝修补术被广泛用于成人腹股沟疝修补术,尽管它伴随着手术并发症,如复发,感染,睾丸萎缩,术后疼痛,和神经损伤。随着Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术后复发率的降低,外科医生的关注点更多地转向腹股沟疝修补术后的腹股沟疼痛(腹股沟痛),因为这已经成为一个相当重要的问题。腹股沟区感兴趣的神经是髂腹股沟,髂腹下,生殖股,和股外侧皮神经。在所有的神经中,髂腹股沟神经在膜成形术中被截留的风险最大.疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛非常显著,无论严重程度如何,它会干扰正常的日常活动。传统的手术技术建议保留髂腹股沟神经,以避免与神经提供的皮肤感觉丧失相关的发病率。一个普遍的观点是,如果我们切除髂腹股沟神经,然后是由于截留而导致术后神经痛的机会,炎症,神经瘤,或纤维化反应将几乎变为零。因此,本研究旨在评估预防性切除髂腹股沟神经对接受Lichtenstein疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的患者的疗效.方法将所有年龄在18岁以上的男性患者纳入研究。所有患者均在脊髓麻醉下进行手术。Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术是疝修补术的标准方法。保留神经的患者保留在A组中,而B组包括接受过神经切除术的患者。首先对患者进行疼痛随访,第三,第六个月,在休息时,锻炼后。根据VAS(视觉模拟量表)评分对疼痛进行分级。结果在本研究中,在总共92名患者中,包括80例患者。在第一个月,A组15%的患者有轻度疼痛,而B组中有5%的人在休息时经历了中度疼痛。锻炼后,B组的结果是30%。同样,在随访的第三个月,发现A组25%的患者经历了轻度疼痛,而12.5%的人抱怨中度疼痛,不得不长期服用镇痛药。在让他们锻炼然后对疼痛进行评分后,发现A组32.5%和B组15%出现疼痛。两组随访6个月后,结果显示,术后疼痛在休息时没有显着差异(A组和B组分别为10%和7.5%,分别)。锻炼后,A组20%的患者主诉疼痛,而在B组中,只有10%的人经历过疼痛。在比较休息时和运动后的慢性腹股沟疼痛时,两组之间没有显着差异。并在不同时间间隔后进行随访(p分别为0.4513和0.548)。结论Lichtenstein无张力膜成形术中预防性切除髂腹股沟神经可降低术后慢性腹股沟疼痛的发生率,但无统计学意义。此外,该过程不影响手术后的生活质量.
    Introduction To date, Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernioplasty is being adopted widely for inguinal hernia repair in adults, although it is accompanied by procedural complications such as recurrences, infection, testicular atrophy, post-operative pain, and nerve injury. As the recurrence rate decreased after Lichtenstein\'s tension-free hernioplasty, surgeons\' point of focus shifted more toward postoperative groin pain (inguinodynia) after inguinal hernia repair, as it has become a quite significant problem. The nerves of interest in the inguinal region are ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Out of all the nerves, the ilioinguinal nerve is at the greatest risk of entrapment during meshplasty. Chronic groin pain is quite significant following hernia repair, and irrespective of the severity, it can interfere with normal daily activity. The traditional surgical technique recommends the preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve to avoid the morbidity associated with the cutaneous sensory loss supplied by the nerve. One popular belief is that if we excise the ilioinguinal nerve, then the chance of getting post-operative neuralgia due to entrapment, inflammation, neuroma, or fibrotic reactions will almost become zero. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of prophylactic excision of the ilioinguinal nerve in the patients undergoing Lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernias. Methods All consecutive male patients presenting to the Department of Surgery with inguinal hernia and age above 18 years were included in the study. All the patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair was taken as the standard procedure for hernia repair. Patients in whom the nerve was preserved were kept in group A, whereas group B comprised patients who had undergone neurectomy. Patients were followed up regarding pain at first, third, and sixth months, at rest, and after exercise. The pain was graded according to the VAS (visual analog scale) scoring. Results In the present study, out of a total of 92 patients, 80 patients were included. In the first month, 15% of the patients in group A had mild pain, while 5% in group B had experienced a moderate degree of pain at rest. After exercise, the result was 30% in group B. Similarly, in the third month of follow-up, it was found that 25% of the patients in group A experienced mild pain, while 12.5% complained about a moderate degree of pain who had to take analgesics for a longer period. After putting them to exercise and then grading the pain, it was found that 32.5% in group A and 15% in group B experienced pain. After follow-up for six months in both groups, it was revealed that there was no significant difference in post-operative pain at rest (10% and 7.5% in groups A and B, respectively). After exercise, 20% of patients in group A complained of pain, while in group B, only 10% experienced pain. There was no significant difference between both the groups while comparing chronic groin pain at rest and after exercise, and after different time intervals in follow-up (p = 0.4513 and 0.548, respectively). Conclusion Prophylactic excision of the ilioinguinal nerve in Lichtenstein tension-free meshplasty decreased the incidence of chronic groin pain after surgery but it was statistically insignificant. Furthermore, this procedure did not affect the quality of life after surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP) & Lichtenstein techniques.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at Department of General & Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar. For performing the analysis, we used SPSS. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, and the categorical ones were presented as frequencies and percentages.
    RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included (30 in each group). The mean age of the patients in both groups was around 54 years, and all patients were males. In unilateral cases the operating time was greater in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001); however, in the bilateral cases, the operating time was significantly greater in the Lichtenstein than the TAPP group (p = 0.003). The pain scores, in unilateral cases, were significantly lower in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate in the TAPP group was 6.7% while in the Lichtenstein group it was at 23.3%. In unilateral and bilateral cases, the patients significantly returned to work earlier in the TAPP group than those in the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: TAPP and Lichtenstein techniques are both safe and reliable techniques for inguinal hernia repair. However, TAPP repair showed lesser post-operative pain, earlier discharge from the hospital, earlier return to usual activities, better cosmetic outcomes, and less persisting pain. However, there was no significant difference in the complication rate and TAPP repair was more costly for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号