Lichtenstein

列支敦士登
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经直肌鞘腹膜外手术(TREPP)是一种开放式手术,其中网状物放置在腹膜前空间中,因此与较少的慢性术后腹股沟疼痛相关。TREPP主要在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下进行,然而,也可以在镇静和局部麻醉下进行,具有潜在的优势。这项回顾性可行性试点研究调查了与Lichtenstein相比,TREPP在门诊局部麻醉下的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在2019年至2022年之间,对所有在门诊手术室局部麻醉下接受择期腹股沟疝修补术的患者进行评估。包括TREPP组的34例患者和Lichtenstein组的213例患者。结果是并发症,操作时间,剧院时间,术后8周和6个月内腹股沟疝复发。
    结果:伤口感染等并发症无显著差异,血肿,血清肿,发现TREPP和Lichtenstein之间的尿潴留和早期复发。Lichtenstein术后8周的术后疼痛没有明显升高(8.8%vs.18.8%,P=0.22)。运行时间(21.0(IQR:16.0-27.3)分钟vs.39.0(IQR:31.5-45.0)分钟,P<0.001)和剧院时间(37.5(IQR:30.8-42.5)分钟vs.54.0(IQR:46.0-62.0)分钟,TREPP的P<0.001)显著较短。
    结论:这项初步研究表明,TREPP在局部麻醉下安全地进行似乎是可行的,其并发症发生率与Lichtenstein相当,手术时间明显短于Lichtenstein。这些结果证明了在更大的研究人群和更长的随访时间内进行进一步的研究,以提供确切的结论。
    BACKGROUND: The Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) is an open procedure in which the mesh is placed in the preperitoneal space and is therefore associated with less chronic post-operative inguinal pain. TREPP is primarily performed under general or spinal anesthesia, however, it is also possible to perform under sedation and local anesthesia with potentially advantages. This retrospective feasibility pilot study investigates the safety and efficiency of TREPP under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic in comparison with Lichtenstein.
    METHODS: Between 2019 and 2022, all patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic operation theatre were assessed. 34 patients in the TREPP group and 213 patients in the Lichtenstein group were included. Outcomes were complications, operating time, theatre time, and early inguinal hernia recurrence within 8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively.
    RESULTS: No significant differences in complications such as wound infection, hematoma, seroma, urine retention and early recurrence between TREPP and Lichtenstein were found. Post-operative pain at 8 weeks was not significantly higher after Lichtenstein (8.8% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.22). Operating time (21.0 (IQR: 16.0-27.3) minutes vs. 39.0 (IQR: 31.5-45.0) minutes, P < 0.001) and theatre time (37.5 (IQR: 30.8-42.5) minutes vs. 54.0 (IQR: 46.0-62.0) minutes, P < 0.001) was significantly shorter for TREPP.
    CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that TREPP appears to be feasible to perform safely under local anesthesia with comparable complication rates and substantially shorter operation time than Lichtenstein. These results justify further research with a larger study population and a longer period of follow up in order to provide firm conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:开放式腹股沟疝修补术和神经处理策略后,慢性疼痛仍然很普遍。一些指南建议避免遇到的神经;然而,神经识别率尚不清楚。这项研究旨在调查基于注册的全国队列中的神经识别率。
    方法:本研究是根据记录指南报告的,常规从丹麦疝数据库收集数据,这与国家患者登记处有关。我们纳入≥18岁的患者,接受Lichtenstein疝修补术,了解髂腹下神经和髂腹股沟神经的神经处理。
    结果:我们纳入了2012年至2022年期间进行的30,911例开放性疝修补术。在73%的修复中确定了髂腹股沟神经,在66%的修复中确定了髂腹下神经。在超过94%的病例中,两条神经都得到了保护。女性患者性别,急诊和复发手术,全身麻醉,内侧和鞍状疝,和大的缺损尺寸都会导致两条神经的神经识别率较低。
    结论:在73%的病例中发现了髂腹股沟神经,而66%的腹下髂神经被识别,几乎所有确定的神经在手术过程中都得以幸免。几个术前和术中因素影响髂腹股沟和髂腹下神经的识别率。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic pain remains prevalent after open inguinal hernia repair and nerve-handling strategies are debated. Some guidelines suggest sparing nerves that are encountered; however, the nerve identification rates are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the nerve identification rates in a register-based nationwide cohort.
    METHODS: This study was reported according to the RECORD guideline and used prospective, routinely collected data from the Danish Hernia Database, which was linked with the National Patient Registry. We included patients ≥ 18 years old, undergoing Lichtenstein hernia repair with information on nerve handling of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves.
    RESULTS: We included 30,911 open hernia repairs performed between 2012 and 2022. The ilioinguinal nerve was identified in 73% of the repairs and the iliohypogastric nerve in 66% of repairs. Both nerves were spared in more than 94% of cases where they were identified. Female patient sex, emergency and recurrence surgery, general anesthesia, medial and saddle hernias, and large defect size all result in lower nerve identification rates for both nerves.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Ilioinguinal nerve was recognized in 73% of cases, while the iliohypogastric nerve was recognized in 66% with almost all identified nerves being spared during surgery. Several pre- and intraoperative factors influenced identification rates of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:双侧腹股沟疝可以同时安全修复,开放或微创,选修sce-nario.手术方式的选择取决于病人的状态,疝的特点,外科医生和患者偏好。在两种方法之间进行选择时是否应考虑年龄标准仍然是一个争论的问题。考虑到对双侧腹股沟疝修补术的最佳修复尚无共识,本研究的目的是对双侧腹股沟疝患者的择期手术方法进行分析。材料和方法:研究双侧腹股沟疝患者的开放与腹腔镜暴露之间的关系,我们进行了一项病例对照研究.在我们的回顾性分析中,病例(23例)为开放入路疝修补术,对照组(82例)为腹腔镜疝修补术。我们分析了两组变量:第一,与患者特征相关(年龄65岁,BMI30kg/m2,吸烟习惯,HTA状态,COPD状态,DM状态,使用抗凝剂,肿瘤状态的存在)和第二,与疝特征相关的变量(腹股沟腹疝,复发性疝和复杂性疝)。结果:病例的平均年龄为73.26(±12.99)岁,对照组为,是56.48(±15.15)年。单变量分析表明四个变量具有统计学意义:年龄65岁,腹股沟阴囊疝,新塑料的地位,和抗凝剂的使用。当引入多变量分析时,我们注意到只有两个变量,年龄65岁(OR=4.183,95%CI[1.289,13.572],p=0.017)和抗凝剂的使用(OR=38.876,95%CI[1.305,1158.011],p=0.035)达到统计学意义。结论:这项研究表明,当我们提到双侧腹股沟疝修补术时,65岁患者接受开放手术的风险至少是65岁患者的4倍.此外,对于同一年龄组,使用抗凝剂增加开放式疝修补术的风险是微创修补术的38倍。有趣的是,在我们的研究中,未发现疝特征与开放式疝修补术和年龄65岁相关.在我们的研究中,我们发现年龄65岁与选择开放式疝修补术而不是微创修补术有关,这可能与年龄相关的风险因素有关。需要进一步研究年龄和年龄相关危险因素对双侧腹股沟疝修补术疗效的影响。
    Introduction: Bilateral inguinal hernia can be safely repaired simultaneously, open or minimally invasive, in an elective sce-nario. The choice of surgical approach depends on the patient\'s status, hernia characteristics, surgeons and patient preferences. Whether age criteria should be considered when selecting between the two approaches is still a matter of debate. Considering that there is no consensus regarding the best repair in bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy, the aim of the study is to perform an analysis regarding elective surgical approach of patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. Material and Methods: To study the relationship between exposure to an open versus laparoscopic approach in patients with bilateral inguinal hernia, we conducted a case-control study. In our retrospective analysis, cases (23 patients) were the open-approach hernia repair, and controls (82 patients) were laparoscopic hernia repair. We analyzed two sets of variables: first, related to patient characteristics (age 65 years, BMI 30 kg/m2, smoking habit, HTA status, COPD status, DM status, use of anticoagulants, presence of neoplastic status) and second, variables related to hernia features (inguinoscrotal hernia, recurrent hernia and complicated hernia). Results: The mean age for cases was 73.26 (Ã+-12.99) years and that of controls, was 56.48 (Ã+-15.15) years. Univariate analysis demonstrated four variables with statistical significance: age 65 years, inguinoscrotal hernia, neo-plastic status, and anticoagulant use. When introduced into the multivariate analysis, we noted that only two variables, age 65 years (OR=4.183, 95% CI [1.289, 13.572], p=0.017) and use of anticoagulants (OR=38.876, 95% CI [1.305, 1158.011], p=0.035) reached statistical significance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that when we refer to bilateral inguinal hernia repair, patients aged 65 years are at risk of having an open procedure at least fourfold more than patients aged 65 years. In addition, the use of anticoagulants increases the risk of open hernia repair 38 times more than that of minimally invasive repair for the same age group. Interestingly, in our study, hernia characteristics were not found to be associated with open hernia repair and age 65 years. In our study we found that age 65 years is associated with electing open hernia repair over minimally invasive repair, which can be linked to age-related risk factors. Further re-search is needed to investigate the impact of age and age-related risk factors on surgical outcomes of bilateral inguinal hernia repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:疝修补术对睾丸功能的影响仍不确定,不管使用的技术。分析疝气修复或激素测量后睾丸体积和流量的研究很少,并且显示出矛盾的结果。这项研究旨在评估使用Lichtenstein和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)技术的手术患者双侧腹股沟疝修补术对男性生育能力的影响。
    方法:对48例原发性双侧腹股沟疝成年患者(20~60岁)进行了一项随机临床试验,比较了使用聚丙烯网片的开放式(Lichtenstein)和腹腔镜(TAPP)疝修补术。患者在术前和术后90和180天(PO)进行评估。性激素(睾酮,FSH,LH和SHGB)分析,睾丸超声检查,进行精液质量性活动变化和生活质量(QoL)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后疼痛。
    结果:共纳入37例患者,年龄44±11岁,19在列支敦士登进行手术,18在TAPP进行手术。不同技术之间的手术时间相似。在第7个PO天,Lichtenstein组的疼痛更大。生化和荷尔蒙分析,睾丸超声检查(多普勒,睾丸体积,和形态学发现)和精子质量相似。然而,180天后,Lichtenstein组的精子形态更好(p<0.05vs.术前)和两名接受Lichtenstein疝修补术的患者在180天后出现少精子症。QoL评估显示手术后在以下领域有显著改善:身体功能,角色情感,身体疼痛和一般健康(p<0.05)。关于列支敦士登与列支敦士登的比较TAPP中没有一个域显示出统计学上的显著差异。没有患者报告性变化。
    结论:双侧腹股沟疝修补术采用聚丙烯补片,无论是使用Lichtenstein还是TAPP,在长期结果方面不会损害男性生育能力。
    背景:经HC/FMUSP研究项目分析伦理委员会(CAPPesq)批准,编号2.974.457,于2015年6月,根据《45535015.4.0000.0068号议定书》于2015年10月在巴西平台注册。在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册,NCT05799742。2016年1月注册第一个科目。
    The effects of hernia repair on testicular function remain uncertain, regardless of the technique used. Studies that analyze testicular volume and flow after hernia repair or hormonal measurements are scarce and show contradictory results. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of bilateral inguinal hernia repair on male fertility in surgical patients in whom the Lichtenstein and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques were used.
    A randomized clinical trial comparing open (Lichtenstein) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) hernia repair using polypropylene mesh was performed in 48 adult patients (20 to 60 years old) with primary bilateral inguinal hernia. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 90 and 180 postoperative (PO) days. Sex hormones (Testosterone, FSH, LH and SHGB) analysis, testicular ultrasonography, semen quality sexual activity changes and quality of life (QoL) were performed. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS).
    Thirty-seven patients with aged of 44 ± 11 years were included, 19 operated on Lichtenstein and 18 operated on TAPP. The surgical time was similar between techniques. The pain was greater in the Lichtenstein group on the 7th PO day. The biochemical and hormonal analyses, testicular ultrasonography (Doppler, testicular volume, and morphological findings) and sperm quality were similar between groups. However, the sperm morphology was better in the Lichtenstein group after 180 days (p < 0.05 vs. preoperative) and two patients who underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair had oligospermia after 180 days. The QoL evaluation showed a significant improvement after surgery in the following domains: physical function, role emotional, bodily pain and general health (p < 0.05). On comparison of Lichtenstein vs. TAPP none of the domains showed statistically significant differences. No patient reported sexual changes.
    Bilateral inguinal hernia repair with polypropylene mesh, whether using Lichtenstein or TAPP, does not impair male fertility in terms of long-term outcomes.
    Approved by the Ethics Committee for the Analysis of Research Projects (CAPPesq) of the HC/FMUSP, Number 2.974.457, in June 2015, Registered on Plataforma Brasil in October 2015 under Protocol 45535015.4.0000.0068. Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05799742. Enrollment of the first subject in January 2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:腹股沟疝的手术修复是普外科诊所中最常见的手术干预措施之一。术后并发症最少,更少的痛苦,和最大的美容效果。这项研究的目的是比较接受Lichtenstein修复(LR)的患者的结果,这是目前最常用的开放式手术来修复腹股沟疝,和腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)修复术后美容,患者满意度,疼痛,和炎症反应。患者和方法:该研究包括18-65岁的男性患者,他们在2022年2月至2023年1月期间在ElazigFethiSekinCity医院的普外科诊所使用两种不同的方法进行了腹股沟疝手术。C反应蛋白(CRP),白细胞,观察白细胞介素6(IL-6)水平,评价所有患者的炎症反应。使用视觉模拟量表和言语评分系统监测术后对疼痛的反应。此外,使用温哥华疤痕量表和改良的石溪疤痕评估量表对两组患者的美容满意度进行评估.结果:TEP组的术后疼痛感觉明显低于LR组。在炎症反应方面,在术后第1天和第2天,LR组的IL-6和CRP水平显着升高。TEP组患者对手术疤痕外观的满意度明显较高。结论:TEP,这是一种腹腔镜疝修补术,是一种安全的手术技术,可以首选,尤其是术后疼痛较少、美容期望较高的患者。在炎症反应方面,差异显著也有利于TEP修复。
    Background: Surgical repair of inguinal hernia is among the most commonly performed surgical interventions in general surgery clinics, with minimal postoperative complications, less pain, and maximum cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent Lichtenstein repair (LR), which is currently the most commonly used open surgical procedure to repair inguinal hernias, and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair with regard to postoperative cosmesis, patient satisfaction, pain, and inflammatory response. Patients and Methods: The study consisted of male patients 18-65 years of age, who were operated for inguinal hernia with two different methods between February 2022 and January 2023 in the general surgery clinic of Elazig Fethi Sekin City Hospital. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were observed to evaluate the inflammatory response in all patients. Visual Analog Scale and Verbal Rating Score systems were used to monitor the response to pain in the postoperative period. In addition, both groups were evaluated for patient satisfaction in cosmetic terms using the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Results: Postoperative pain sensation in the TEP group was found to be significantly lower compared to the LR group. In terms of inflammatory response, IL-6 and CRP levels were found to be significantly higher in the LR group on postoperative day 1 and 2. Satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the surgical scar was significantly higher in the TEP group. Conclusion: TEP, which is a laparoscopic hernia repair method, is a safe surgical technique that can be preferred, especially in patients with less postoperative pain and higher cosmetic expectations. In terms of inflammatory response, significant difference is also in favor of TEP repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹股沟疝修补术是世界范围内最常见的手术之一。慢性术后腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)是手术修复后最常见且具有挑战性的并发症,具有较高的社会经济影响。这项研究的目的是比较列支敦士登的一年CPIP率,经腹股沟腹膜前(TIPP),法国疝登记处的经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP)修复技术。
    方法:在2011年至2021年之间,登记簿上有15,161例原发性腹股沟疝修补术和1年随访。使用倾向得分(PS)匹配,配对形成。每组分别成对比较;Lichtenstein与TIPP,TEP和TAPP,TIPP与TEP和TAPP,最后是TEP与TAPP。
    结果:PS匹配分析后,列支敦士登小组在TIPP上表现出劣势,TAPP和TEP组在一年时CPIP明显更多(15.2%vs9.6%,p<0.0001;15.9%vs.10.0%,p<0.0001和16.1%vs.12.4%,分别为p=0.002)。TIPP与TAPP和TEP组的1年CPIP率相似(9.3%vs10.5%,p=0.19和9.8%对11.8%,分别为p=0.05)。TAPP修复后的CPIP率明显低于TEP(1.00%vs11.9%,p=0.02)。
    结论:这项基于注册的研究证实,与腹膜前修复技术相比,Lichtenstein修复后的CPIP风险更高。TIPP导致与TAPP和TEP维修相当的CPIP率。
    Groin hernia repair is one of the most frequent operation performed worldwide. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is the most common and challenging complication after surgical repair with subsequent high socio-economic impact. The aim of this study was to compare the one-year CPIP rates between Lichtenstein, trans-inguinal pre-peritoneal (TIPP), trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) repair techniques on the French Hernia Registry.
    Between 2011 and 2021, 15,161 primary groin hernia repairs with 1-year follow-up were available on the register. Using propensity score (PS) matching, matched pairs were formed. Each group was compared in pairs independently; Lichtenstein versus TIPP, TEP and TAPP, TIPP versus TEP and TAPP and finally TEP versus TAPP.
    After PS matching analysis, Lichtenstein group showed disadvantage over TIPP, TAPP and TEP groups with significantly more CPIP at one year (15.2% vs 9.6%, p < 0.0001; 15.9% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.0001 and 16.1% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). The 1-year CPIP rates were similar comparing TIPP versus TAPP and TEP groups (9.3% vs 10.5%, p = 0.19 and 9.8% vs 11.8%, p = 0.05, respectively). There was significantly less CPIP rate after TAPP versus TEP repair (1.00% vs 11.9%, p = 0.02).
    This register-based study confirms the higher CPIP risk after Lichtenstein repair compared to the pre-peritoneal repair techniques. TIPP leads to comparable CPIP rates than TAPP and TEP repairs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    <b>简介:</b>Lichtenstein疝修补术30年来一直是疝修补术的黄金标准。然而,手术后可能会出现不可接受的高慢性疼痛,麻木和不适。</br></br><b>目的:</b>比较使用ParieteneProGrip自固定网格和标准轻质大孔网格修复Lichtenstein的效果。</br></br><b>材料与方法:随机化,prospective,单盲(患者盲)研究。随机分为两个治疗组:对照组为88例患者,使用轻型标准网(LS)进行Lichtenstein方法治疗,研究组为53例患者,使用自固定网(PG)进行治疗。随访6个月。主要结果是出院时术后疼痛的存在和严重程度,在手术后30天和6个月。其他研究参数是:手术持续时间,住院时间,早期和晚期并发症的存在,恢复全面活动和患者满意度所需的时间。</br></br><b>结果:</b>出院时或长期随访时疼痛严重程度无统计学差异。在手术后的前30天,PG组的患者抱怨NRS疼痛更严重(2.0vs1.4)(P=0.0466)。PG组的手术时间比LS组短9.4分钟(P=0.0027)。在其他研究参数中,两组之间未发现统计学上的显着差异。</br></br><b>结论:</b>自固定网片可以安全地用于腹股沟管修补术。它大大缩短了手术时间,但同时没有减轻疼痛的严重程度,包括术后慢性腹股沟疼痛的发生率。
    <b> Introduction:</b> Lichtenstein hernioplasty has been a gold standard of hernioplasty for 30 years now. However, the procedure may be followed by an unacceptably high rate of chronic pain, numbness and discomfort. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> To compare outcomes of Lichtenstein repair using a Parietene ProGrip self-fixing mesh versus the standard lightweight macroporous mesh. </br></br> <b>Material and methods:</b> As many as 141 patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernia participated in this single-centre, randomised, prospective, single-blind (patient-blinded) study. Randomisation yielded two treatment groups: control group of 88 patients treated with Lichtenstein method using lightweight standard mesh (LS) and study group of 53 patients receiving treatment with self-fixing mesh (PG). Patients were followed up for 6 months. Primary outcome was the presence and severity of postoperative pain at discharge, at 30 days and 6 months post-procedure. Other study parameters were: duration of the procedure, duration of hospitalisation, presence of early and late complications, time needed to return to full activity and patient satisfaction. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> No statistically significant differences in pain severity were demonstrated at discharge or at long-term follow-up. In the first 30 days post-procedure the patients in the PG group complained of pain of greater severity on the NRS (2.0 vs 1.4) (P = 0.0466). The duration of the procedure in the PG group was 9.4 minutes shorter than in the LS group (P = 0.0027). No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in other studied parameters. </br></br><b>Conclusions:</b> Self-fixing mesh can be safely used in inguinal canal repair procedures. It significantly shortened the duration of the procedure but at the same time did not reduce the severity of pain, including the rate of chronic postoperative inguinal pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:Lichtenstein疝修补术一直被视为腹股沟疝修补术的金标准。不幸的是,这种修复通常与慢性疼痛有关,高达10-35%。因此,已经开发了几种新技术,例如经腹股沟腹膜前补片(TIPP)和内窥镜全腹膜外(TEP)技术。一些研究表明,与Lichtenstein疝修补术相比,TIPP和TEP的有益结果;然而,在比较TIPP和TEP程序时,几乎没有公布结果。本研究旨在评估TIPP与TEP技术腹股沟疝修补术后的结果。
    方法:在2015年至2020年之间进行了一项单中心随机对照试验。共纳入300例单侧腹股沟疝患者,并随机接受TIPP或TEP技术。主要结果是慢性疼痛(定义为最后3个月后的任何疼痛)和生活质量,在12个月时使用卡罗莱纳州舒适量表(CCS)进行评估。次要结果是:伤口感染,伤口感觉减退,复发,30天内重新接纳,再操作。
    结果:共300例患者被随机分组(每组150例)。经过12个月的随访,我们观察到术后慢性腹股沟疼痛明显减少,劳累时的慢性疼痛,伤口感觉减退,与TIPP程序相比,TEP后的伤口感染。生活质量无显著差异,重新操作,复发率,并观察到30天内再入院。
    结论:我们表明,与TIPP程序相比,TEP程序具有良好的结果,减少术后疼痛和伤口并发症,而两组的复发率和再手术率相等.
    The Lichtenstein hernioplasty has long been seen as the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Unfortunately, this repair is often associated with chronic pain, up to 10-35%. Therefore, several new techniques have been developed, such as the transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) and the endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Several studies showed beneficial results of the TIPP and TEP compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty; however, little is published on the outcome when comparing the TIPP and TEP procedures. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the TIPP vs the TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair.
    A single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out between 2015 and 2020. A total of 300 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomized to the TIPP- or TEP technique. Primary outcome was chronic pain (defined as any pain following the last 3 months) and quality of life, assessed with Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were: wound infection, wound hypoesthesia, recurrence, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation.
    A total of 300 patients were randomized (150 per group). After a follow-up of 12 months, we observed significantly less postoperative chronic groin pain, chronic pain at exertion, wound hypoesthesia, and wound infections after the TEP when compared to the TIPP procedure. No significant differences in quality of life, reoperations, recurrence rate, and readmission within 30 days were observed.
    We showed that the TEP has a favorable outcome compared to the TIPP procedure, leading to less postoperative pain and wound complications, whereas recurrence rates and reoperations were equal in both the groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迄今为止,Lichtenstein无张力网片疝修补术被广泛用于成人腹股沟疝修补术,尽管它伴随着手术并发症,如复发,感染,睾丸萎缩,术后疼痛,和神经损伤。随着Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术后复发率的降低,外科医生的关注点更多地转向腹股沟疝修补术后的腹股沟疼痛(腹股沟痛),因为这已经成为一个相当重要的问题。腹股沟区感兴趣的神经是髂腹股沟,髂腹下,生殖股,和股外侧皮神经。在所有的神经中,髂腹股沟神经在膜成形术中被截留的风险最大.疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛非常显著,无论严重程度如何,它会干扰正常的日常活动。传统的手术技术建议保留髂腹股沟神经,以避免与神经提供的皮肤感觉丧失相关的发病率。一个普遍的观点是,如果我们切除髂腹股沟神经,然后是由于截留而导致术后神经痛的机会,炎症,神经瘤,或纤维化反应将几乎变为零。因此,本研究旨在评估预防性切除髂腹股沟神经对接受Lichtenstein疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的患者的疗效.方法将所有年龄在18岁以上的男性患者纳入研究。所有患者均在脊髓麻醉下进行手术。Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术是疝修补术的标准方法。保留神经的患者保留在A组中,而B组包括接受过神经切除术的患者。首先对患者进行疼痛随访,第三,第六个月,在休息时,锻炼后。根据VAS(视觉模拟量表)评分对疼痛进行分级。结果在本研究中,在总共92名患者中,包括80例患者。在第一个月,A组15%的患者有轻度疼痛,而B组中有5%的人在休息时经历了中度疼痛。锻炼后,B组的结果是30%。同样,在随访的第三个月,发现A组25%的患者经历了轻度疼痛,而12.5%的人抱怨中度疼痛,不得不长期服用镇痛药。在让他们锻炼然后对疼痛进行评分后,发现A组32.5%和B组15%出现疼痛。两组随访6个月后,结果显示,术后疼痛在休息时没有显着差异(A组和B组分别为10%和7.5%,分别)。锻炼后,A组20%的患者主诉疼痛,而在B组中,只有10%的人经历过疼痛。在比较休息时和运动后的慢性腹股沟疼痛时,两组之间没有显着差异。并在不同时间间隔后进行随访(p分别为0.4513和0.548)。结论Lichtenstein无张力膜成形术中预防性切除髂腹股沟神经可降低术后慢性腹股沟疼痛的发生率,但无统计学意义。此外,该过程不影响手术后的生活质量.
    Introduction To date, Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernioplasty is being adopted widely for inguinal hernia repair in adults, although it is accompanied by procedural complications such as recurrences, infection, testicular atrophy, post-operative pain, and nerve injury. As the recurrence rate decreased after Lichtenstein\'s tension-free hernioplasty, surgeons\' point of focus shifted more toward postoperative groin pain (inguinodynia) after inguinal hernia repair, as it has become a quite significant problem. The nerves of interest in the inguinal region are ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Out of all the nerves, the ilioinguinal nerve is at the greatest risk of entrapment during meshplasty. Chronic groin pain is quite significant following hernia repair, and irrespective of the severity, it can interfere with normal daily activity. The traditional surgical technique recommends the preservation of the ilioinguinal nerve to avoid the morbidity associated with the cutaneous sensory loss supplied by the nerve. One popular belief is that if we excise the ilioinguinal nerve, then the chance of getting post-operative neuralgia due to entrapment, inflammation, neuroma, or fibrotic reactions will almost become zero. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the effect of prophylactic excision of the ilioinguinal nerve in the patients undergoing Lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernias. Methods All consecutive male patients presenting to the Department of Surgery with inguinal hernia and age above 18 years were included in the study. All the patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair was taken as the standard procedure for hernia repair. Patients in whom the nerve was preserved were kept in group A, whereas group B comprised patients who had undergone neurectomy. Patients were followed up regarding pain at first, third, and sixth months, at rest, and after exercise. The pain was graded according to the VAS (visual analog scale) scoring. Results In the present study, out of a total of 92 patients, 80 patients were included. In the first month, 15% of the patients in group A had mild pain, while 5% in group B had experienced a moderate degree of pain at rest. After exercise, the result was 30% in group B. Similarly, in the third month of follow-up, it was found that 25% of the patients in group A experienced mild pain, while 12.5% complained about a moderate degree of pain who had to take analgesics for a longer period. After putting them to exercise and then grading the pain, it was found that 32.5% in group A and 15% in group B experienced pain. After follow-up for six months in both groups, it was revealed that there was no significant difference in post-operative pain at rest (10% and 7.5% in groups A and B, respectively). After exercise, 20% of patients in group A complained of pain, while in group B, only 10% experienced pain. There was no significant difference between both the groups while comparing chronic groin pain at rest and after exercise, and after different time intervals in follow-up (p = 0.4513 and 0.548, respectively). Conclusion Prophylactic excision of the ilioinguinal nerve in Lichtenstein tension-free meshplasty decreased the incidence of chronic groin pain after surgery but it was statistically insignificant. Furthermore, this procedure did not affect the quality of life after surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP) & Lichtenstein techniques.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at Department of General & Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar. For performing the analysis, we used SPSS. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, and the categorical ones were presented as frequencies and percentages.
    RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included (30 in each group). The mean age of the patients in both groups was around 54 years, and all patients were males. In unilateral cases the operating time was greater in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001); however, in the bilateral cases, the operating time was significantly greater in the Lichtenstein than the TAPP group (p = 0.003). The pain scores, in unilateral cases, were significantly lower in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate in the TAPP group was 6.7% while in the Lichtenstein group it was at 23.3%. In unilateral and bilateral cases, the patients significantly returned to work earlier in the TAPP group than those in the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: TAPP and Lichtenstein techniques are both safe and reliable techniques for inguinal hernia repair. However, TAPP repair showed lesser post-operative pain, earlier discharge from the hospital, earlier return to usual activities, better cosmetic outcomes, and less persisting pain. However, there was no significant difference in the complication rate and TAPP repair was more costly for the patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号