Ketamine

氯胺酮
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管这种兴趣与日俱增,氯胺酮研究缺乏全面和系统的文献计量分析。本研究旨在通过文献计量分析总结氯胺酮的研究进展,提供对该领域发展和方向的见解。
    与氯胺酮有关的出版物于2024年2月15日从WebofScienceCoreCollection(WoSCC)数据库中检索到。在进行全面的文献计量分析时,精心收集了各种书目元素,以绘制特定领域内的研究景观。
    在2014年1月1日至2023年12月31日之间,来自128个国家8,914个机构的45,891位作者在1,752种学术期刊上发表了总计10,328篇关于氯胺酮研究的文章。在此期间,出版物数量稳步增长。美利坚合众国(美国)和中华人民共和国在出版物和引文方面均处于领先地位。国家心理健康研究所(NIMH)和耶鲁大学成为该研究领域最活跃的机构。美国国立卫生研究院国家精神卫生研究所的CarlosZarate被认为是最多的重要出版物,并获得了最多的共同引用。分析揭示了关键的研究主题,包括作用机制,不良事件,精神病学应用,和围手术期影响。
    这项研究提供了对全球氯胺酮研究格局的全面文献计量和知识图谱分析,提供对趋势的宝贵见解,关键贡献者,以及该领域内的主题重点领域。通过描述氯胺酮研究的演变,本研究旨在指导未来的学术努力,提高我们对氯胺酮治疗潜力的认识。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite this growing interest, there remains a lack of comprehensive and systematic bibliometric analyses of ketamine research. This study aimed to summarize the progress in ketamine research through bibliometric analysis, providing insights into the development and direction of the field.
    UNASSIGNED: Publications related to ketamine were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database on February 15, 2024. In conducting a comprehensive bibliometric analysis, a variety of bibliographic elements were meticulously collected to map the landscape of research within a specific field.
    UNASSIGNED: Between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2023, a total of 10,328 articles on ketamine research were published across 1,752 academic journals by 45,891 authors from 8,914 institutions in 128 countries. The publication volume has shown a steady increase over this period. The United States of America (USA) and the People\'s Republic of China lead in both publication and citation counts. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and Yale University emerge as the most active institutions in this research domain. Carlos Zarate of the NIH National Institute of Mental Health was noted for the highest number of significant publications and received the most co-citations. The analysis revealed key research themes including mechanism of action, adverse events, psychiatric applications, and perioperative implications.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provided comprehensive bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis of the global ketamine research landscape, offering valuable insights into the trends, key contributors, and thematic focus areas within the field. By delineating the evolution of ketamine research, this study aims to guide future scholarly endeavors and enhance our understanding of ketamine\'s therapeutic potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    将不熟悉的疗法纳入实践需要有效的纵向学习,并且对实现这一目标的最佳方法进行了辩论。虽然不是一种新颖的疗法,重症监护中的氯胺酮缺乏数据和可变的接受度,有限的研究描述了强化主义者的感知和利用。冠状病毒-19大流行带来了一场特殊的危机,提供者迅速调整了分析策略,以实现延长,严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的深度镇静。
    氯胺酮的临床经验如何影响临床医生对该疗法的看法和态度?
    我们使用定量氯胺酮处方数据和定性焦点小组数据进行了混合方法研究。我们分析了三级学术ICU在两个不同时间点的氯胺酮处方模式:COVID-19前期(2019年3月1日至6月30日)和COVID-19激增期间(2020年3月1日至6月30日)。举行了两个重症监护护理重点小组(FG),并使用框架方法进行内容分析。
    对46例内科ICU患者进行了机械通气(195例发生在COVID-19之前,251例发生在COVID-19期间)。COVID-19人群更有可能接受氯胺酮(81[32.3%]对4[2.1%],p<0.001)。13名受访者参加了两次FG会议(前COVID=8,后COVID=5)。我们受访者中最普遍的态度是不适,确定了三个关键主题如下:1)缺乏关于氯胺酮的证据,2)缺乏个人经验,3)渴望更多的教育和协议。
    尽管COVID-19期间氯胺酮的处方大幅增加,但强化药继续对使用感到不适。造成这种不适的因素包括缺乏证据,缺乏经验,以及对更多教育和协议的渴望。单独使用氯胺酮的经验增加不足以使提供者的不适最小化。这些发现应该为未来的课程提供信息,并呼吁改进过程以优化继续教育。
    UNASSIGNED: Incorporating unfamiliar therapies into practice requires effective longitudinal learning and the optimal way to achieve this is debated. Though not a novel therapy, ketamine in critical care has a paucity of data and variable acceptance, with limited research describing intensivist perceptions and utilization. The Coronavirus-19 pandemic presented a particular crisis where providers rapidly adapted analgosedation strategies to achieve prolonged, deep sedation due to a surge of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
    UNASSIGNED: How does clinical experience with ketamine impact the perception and attitude of clinicians toward this therapy?
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a mixed-methods study using quantitative ketamine prescription data and qualitative focus group data. We analyzed prescription patterns of ketamine in a tertiary academic ICU during two different time points: pre-COVID-19 (March 1-June 30, 2019) and during the COVID-19 surge (March 1-June 30, 2020). Two focus groups (FG) of critical care attendings were held, and data were analyzed using the Framework Method for content analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Four-hundred forty-six medical ICU patients were mechanically ventilated (195 pre-COVID-19 and 251 during COVID-19). The COVID-19 population was more likely to receive ketamine (81[32.3%] vs 4 [2.1%], p < 0.001). Thirteen respondents participated across two FG sessions (Pre-COVID = 8, Post-COVID=5). The most prevalent attitude among our respondents was discomfort, with three key themes identified as follows: 1) lack of evidence regarding ketamine, 2) lack of personal experience, and 3) desire for more education and protocols.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite a substantial increase in ketamine prescription during COVID-19, intensivists continued to feel discomfort with utilization. Factors contributing to this discomfort include a lack of evidence, a lack of experience, and a desire for more education and protocols. Increase in experience with ketamine alone was not sufficient to minimize provider discomfort. These findings should inform future curricula and call for process improvement to optimize continuing education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与恐惧有关的疾病,包括创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),焦虑症是普遍存在的精神疾病,以持续的恐惧为特征,源于其失调的获取和灭绝。这些疾病的主要治疗方法,暴露疗法(ET),严重依赖恐惧灭绝(FE)原则。青春期,发展为精神疾病的脆弱时期,其特征是恐惧回路的神经生物学变化,导致FE受损和ET后复发的易感性增加。氯胺酮,以缓解焦虑和减轻创伤后应激障碍症状而闻名,影响恐惧相关的学习过程和整个恐惧电路的突触可塑性。我们的研究旨在从行为和分子水平研究氯胺酮(10mg/kg)对青春期雄性C57BL/6小鼠FE的影响。我们分析了海马(HPC)和前额叶皮质(PFC)中突触可塑性标记的蛋白质和基因表达,并试图确定与氯胺酮对青少年灭绝学习的影响相关的神经相关性。氯胺酮改善了青春期男性的FE,可能影响灭绝记忆的巩固和/或回忆。氯胺酮还增加了恐惧熄灭小鼠HPC中Akt和mTOR活性以及GluA1和GluN2A的水平,并上调了HPC和PFC中BDNF外显子IVmRNA的表达。此外,氯胺酮增加了特定大脑区域的c-Fos表达,包括腹侧HPC(vHPC)和左下侧腹内侧PFC(ILvmPFC)。全面探索氯胺酮在青少年FE中的作用机制,我们的研究表明氯胺酮对青少年男性FE的影响与海马Akt-mTOR-GluA1信号的激活有关,用vHPC和左ILvmPFC作为所提出的神经相关性。
    Fear-related disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety disorders are pervasive psychiatric conditions marked by persistent fear, stemming from its dysregulated acquisition and extinction. The primary treatment for these disorders, exposure therapy (ET), relies heavily on fear extinction (FE) principles. Adolescence, a vulnerable period for developing psychiatric disorders, is characterized by neurobiological changes in the fear circuitry, leading to impaired FE and increased susceptibility to relapse following ET. Ketamine, known for relieving anxiety and reducing PTSD symptoms, influences fear-related learning processes and synaptic plasticity across the fear circuitry. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of ketamine (10 mg/kg) on FE in adolescent male C57 BL/6 mice at the behavioral and molecular levels. We analyzed the protein and gene expression of synaptic plasticity markers in the hippocampus (HPC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) and sought to identify neural correlates associated with ketamine\'s effects on adolescent extinction learning. Ketamine ameliorated FE in the adolescent males, likely affecting the consolidation and/or recall of extinction memory. Ketamine also increased the Akt and mTOR activity and the GluA1 and GluN2A levels in the HPC and upregulated BDNF exon IV mRNA expression in the HPC and PFC of the fear-extinguished mice. Furthermore, ketamine increased the c-Fos expression in specific brain regions, including the ventral HPC (vHPC) and the left infralimbic ventromedial PFC (IL vmPFC). Providing a comprehensive exploration of ketamine\'s mechanisms in adolescent FE, our study suggests that ketamine\'s effects on FE in adolescent males are associated with the activation of hippocampal Akt-mTOR-GluA1 signaling, with the vHPC and the left IL vmPFC as the proposed neural correlates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景和目的:难治性双相抑郁(TRBPD)的选择有限。电惊厥疗法(ECT)已显示出在TRBPD中的功效。然而,与ECT相关的认知缺陷和记忆问题对相当多的患者是有问题的.目前尚不清楚ECT失败的TRBPD患者的下一步是什么。材料和方法:在本案例报告中,我们介绍了一名TRBPD患者,他连续接受了12次短暂脉冲右单侧ECT,22次氯胺酮输注0.5-0.75mg/kg,持续40分钟,和39次深重复经颅磁刺激(dTMS)。结果:患者从ECT中获益,但由于记忆问题而拒绝继续ECT。患者耐受氯胺酮输注良好,但获益有限。然而,患者对dTMS急性治疗反应良好,并保持相对稳定超过2年.结论:此病例表明,ECT和/或氯胺酮输注失败的TRBPD患者可能受益于dTMS。
    Background and Objectives: Options for treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBPD) are limited. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has shown efficacy in TRBPD. However, the cognitive deficits and memory concerns associated with ECT are problematic for a significant number of patients. It remains unclear what the next step is for patients with TRBPD who fail ECT. Materials and Methods: In this case report, we present a patient with TRBPD who sequentially received 12 sessions of brief-pulse right unilateral ECT, 22 sessions of ketamine infusion at 0.5-0.75 mg/kg for 40 min, and 39 sessions of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS). Results: The patient had some benefit from ECT, but declined continuation of ECT due to memory concerns. The patient tolerated ketamine infusion well but had limited benefit. However, the patient responded well to acute treatment with dTMS and maintained relative stability for more than 2 years. Conclusions: This case suggests that patients with TRBPD who fail ECT and/or ketamine infusion might benefit from dTMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    NMDA受体拮抗剂具有治疗神经和精神疾病的潜力,包括神经退行性疾病,癫痫,创伤性脑损伤,药物滥用障碍(SUD),和重度抑郁症(MDD)。(S)-氯胺酮是一类新型抗抑郁药的第一个,速效抗抑郁药,被批准用于医疗用途。立体异构体,(R)-氯胺酮(arketamine),目前正在开发治疗抗性抑郁症(TRD)。该化合物已在多种动物模型中证明了功效。两项临床研究揭示了TRD和双相抑郁的疗效。药物赞助商的一项研究最近未能达到先验临床终点,但事后分析显示了疗效。(R)-氯胺酮的临床价值得到了人类和啮齿动物实验数据的支持,表明它不那么镇静,不会产生明显的精神模拟或解离作用,滥用可能性比(S)-氯胺酮小,并在一系列神经和精神疾病的动物模型中产生功效。假设(R)-氯胺酮的抗抑郁作用的作用机制是由于NMDA受体拮抗作用和/或非NMDA受体机制。我们建议,(R)-氯胺酮的进一步临床试验将为当前药物治疗不足的一些神经和精神疾病创造新的和改进的药物。
    NMDA receptor antagonists have potential for therapeutics in neurological and psychiatric diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, substance abuse disorder (SUD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). (S)-ketamine was the first of a novel class of antidepressants, rapid-acting antidepressants, to be approved for medical use. The stereoisomer, (R)-ketamine (arketamine), is currently under development for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The compound has demonstrated efficacy in multiple animal models. Two clinical studies disclosed efficacy in TRD and bipolar depression. A study by the drug sponsor recently failed to reach a priori clinical endpoints but post hoc analysis revealed efficacy. The clinical value of (R)-ketamine is supported by experimental data in humans and rodents, showing that it is less sedating, does not produce marked psychotomimetic or dissociative effects, has less abuse potential than (S)-ketamine, and produces efficacy in animal models of a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The mechanisms of action of the antidepressant effects of (R)-ketamine are hypothesized to be due to NMDA receptor antagonism and/or non-NMDA receptor mechanisms. We suggest that further clinical experimentation with (R)-ketamine will create novel and improved medicines for some of the neurological and psychiatric disorders that are underserved by current medications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:柔性支气管镜检查(FB)期间的镇静应保持足够的呼吸驱动,确保患者的最大舒适度,并保证程序的目标得以实现。然而,FB的最佳镇静方法尚未建立。本研究旨在比较咪达唑仑-芬太尼(MF)与右美托咪定-氯胺酮(DK)的标准推荐组合在FB期间的患者镇静作用。
    方法:将接受FB的患者随机分配到DK组(n=25)和MF组(n=25)。主要结果是临界去饱和事件的发生率(动脉血氧饱和度<80%,鼻供氧2L/min)。次要结果包括镇静深度,血流动力学并发症,不良事件,以及患者和支气管镜医生的满意度。
    结果:两组间严重的去饱和事件发生率相似(DK:12%vs.MF:28%,p=0.289)。DK达到了更深的最大镇静水平(更高的Ramsay-更低的Riker量表;p<0.001),并且与更长的恢复时间相关(p<0.001)。两组的血流动力学和其他并发症发生率相当。两组患者的满意度相似,但支气管镜医师对DK组合的满意度更高(p=0.033)。
    结论:DK在接受FB治疗的患者中表现出良好的安全性,并且比标准MF组合获得了更深刻的镇静作用和更好的支气管镜医师满意度,而没有增加不良事件的发生率。
    BACKGROUND: Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) should maintain an adequate respiratory drive, ensure maximum comfort for the patient, and warrant that the objectives of the procedure are achieved. Nevertheless, the optimal sedation method for FB has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the standard recommended combination of midazolam-fentanyl (MF) with that of dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) for patient sedation during FB.
    METHODS: Patients subjected to FB were randomly assigned to a DK (n = 25) and an MF group (n = 25). The primary outcome was the rate of critical desaturation events (arterial oxygen saturation < 80% with nasal oxygen supply 2 L/min). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, hemodynamic complications, adverse events, and patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction.
    RESULTS: The incidence rates of critical desaturation events were similar between the two groups (DK: 12% vs. MF: 28%, p = 0.289). DK achieved deeper maximum sedation levels (higher Ramsay - lower Riker scale; p < 0.001) and was associated with longer recovery times (p < 0.001). Both groups had comparable rates of hemodynamic and other complications. Patient satisfaction was similar between the two groups, but bronchoscopist satisfaction was higher with the DK combination (p = 0.033).
    CONCLUSIONS: DK demonstrated a good safety profile in patients subjected to FB and achieved more profound sedation and better bronchoscopist satisfaction than the standard MF combination without increasing the rate of adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在通过综合现有研究来检查氯胺酮在急性和预防慢性开胸术后疼痛的管理中的有效性。
    在PubMed,Scopus,和科克伦图书馆到2023年5月。包括研究氯胺酮对成人开胸术后疼痛影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。干预组包括氯胺酮加吗啡,而对照组仅包括吗啡。结果指标是阿片类药物摄入量和休息和移动/咳嗽时的疼痛评分。使用Cochrane偏差风险和等级评估来评估证据质量。
    选择包含556名患者的9篇文章进行荟萃分析。干预组静息时疼痛显着降低(Std。术后第一天的平均差(SMD=-0.60,95%CI[-0.83,-0.37])和运动/咳嗽(SMD=-0.73[-1.27,-0.18])。此外,与对照组相比,氯胺酮组的阿片类药物消费量(mg)较低(SMD=-2.75[-4.14,-1.36],p值=0.0001)在术后第1-3天。没有数据来评估氯胺酮对慢性疼痛的长期影响。
    这项荟萃分析表明,使用氯胺酮可以降低开胸手术后的急性疼痛水平和吗啡使用。在未来,使用标准化方法进行更大规模的随机对照试验,并评估氯胺酮的短期和长期镇痛效果,对于加深对该问题的理解是必要的.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to examine how effective ketamine is in the management of acute and preventing chronic post-thoracotomy pain by synthesizing the available research.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library till May 2023. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) examining the influence of ketamine on post-thoracotomy pain in adults were included. The intervention group included ketamine plus morphine, while the control group included morphine only. The outcome measures were opioid intake and pain scores at rest and on moving/coughing. Evidence quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias and GRADE assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine articles comprising 556 patients were selected for meta-analysis. The intervention group had a significant decrease in pain at rest (Std. Mean Difference (SMD = -0.60 with 95% CI [-0.83, -0.37]) and on movement/cough (SMD = -0.73 [-1.27, -0.18]) in the first postoperative days. Also, the ketamine group had lower opioid consumption (mg) in comparison with controls (SMD = -2.75 [-4.14, -1.36], p-value = 0.0001) in postoperative days 1-3. There was no data to assess the long-term effect of ketamine on chronic pain.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis shows that ketamine use can lower acute pain levels and morphine use after thoracotomy. In the future, larger RCTs using standardized methods and assessing both short-term and long-term analgesic effects of ketamine are necessary to deepen the understanding of the issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速心脏麻醉(FTCA)的最佳药理学策略尚不清楚。本研究评估了使用美沙酮和非阿片类药物佐剂输注的FTCA计划的有效性和安全性(镁,氯胺酮,利多卡因,和右美托咪定)用于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者。
    方法:本回顾性研究,在私人和公共教学部门进行了多中心观察研究。我们根据临床医生的喜好,研究了通过快速通道协议或常规护理管理的患者。主要结果是根据医院调整的总机械通气时间(以小时为单位),身体质量指数,外科急迫的类别,体外循环时间和EuroSCOREII。次要结果包括术后4小时内成功拔管,术后疼痛评分,术后阿片类药物需求,以及术后并发症的发展。
    结果:我们纳入了87例快速治疗组患者和88例常规治疗组患者。与常规护理患者相比,快速跟踪患者的总通气时间减少了35%(p=0.007)。与10例(11.4%)常规治疗患者相比,35例(40.2%)快速治疗患者在4小时内拔管(比值比:5.2[95%CI:2.39-11.08;p<0.001])。超过24小时,快速治疗患者的疼痛较轻(p<0.001),需要的静脉注射吗啡当量较少(22.00mg[15.75:32.50]vs.38.75mg[20.50:81.75];p<0.001)。两组之间的术后并发症或住院时间没有显着差异。
    结论:使用美沙酮实施FTCA方案,右美托咪定,镁,氯胺酮,利多卡因,瑞芬太尼与机械通气协议中的脱乳油一起与气管拔管时间显着缩短有关,改善术后镇痛,减少阿片类药物的使用,没有任何不良安全事件。有必要进行前瞻性随机试验,以进一步研究这些药物在减少FTCA并发症和住院时间方面的综合作用。
    背景:该研究方案已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12623000060640。aspx,于2023年1月17日追溯注册)。
    BACKGROUND: An optimal pharmacological strategy for fast-track cardiac anesthesia (FTCA) is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of an FTCA program using methadone and non-opioid adjuvant infusions (magnesium, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
    METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted across private and public teaching sectors. We studied patients managed by a fast-track protocol or via usual care according to clinician preference. The primary outcome was the total mechanical ventilation time in hours adjusted for hospital, body mass index, category of surgical urgency, cardiopulmonary bypass time and EuroSCORE II. Secondary outcomes included successful extubation within four postoperative hours, postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid requirements, and the development of postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: We included 87 patients in the fast-track group and 88 patients in the usual care group. Fast-track patients had a 35% reduction in total ventilation hours compared with usual care patients (p = 0.007). Thirty-five (40.2%) fast-track patients were extubated within four hours compared to 10 (11.4%) usual-care patients (odds ratio: 5.2 [95% CI: 2.39-11.08; p < 0.001]). Over 24 h, fast-track patients had less severe pain (p < 0.001) and required less intravenous morphine equivalent (22.00 mg [15.75:32.50] vs. 38.75 mg [20.50:81.75]; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences observed in postoperative complications or length of hospital stay between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an FTCA protocol using methadone, dexmedetomidine, magnesium, ketamine, lignocaine, and remifentanil together with protocolized weaning from a mechanical ventilation protocol is associated with significantly reduced time to tracheal extubation, improved postoperative analgesia, and reduced opioid use without any adverse safety events. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to further investigate the combined effects of these medications in reducing complications and length of stay in FTCA.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12623000060640.aspx , retrospectively registered on 17/01/2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ELEKT-D:治疗性抑郁症(TRD)患者的电惊厥治疗(ECT)与氯胺酮(ELEKT-D)试验证明,静脉内氯胺酮与ECT对非精神病性TRD的非劣效性。可以指导氯胺酮与ECT选择的临床特征可以为TRD患者提供共同的决策。
    评估选择的临床特征是否与氯胺酮与ECT的差异改善相关。
    这项对开放标签非劣效性随机临床试验的二次分析是一项多中心研究,于2017年4月7日至2022年11月11日在美国5个学术医学中心进行。这项研究的分析,试验方案中没有预先指定的,于2023年5月10日至10月31日进行。研究队列包括TRD患者,年龄21至75岁,他们目前处于至少中等严重程度的非精神病性抑郁发作,并被临床医生转介接受ECT治疗。
    符合条件的参与者在3周内1:1随机接受6次氯胺酮输注或9次ECT治疗。
    基线因素之间的关联(包括抑郁症状自我报告的16项快速清单[QIDS-SR16],蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表[MADRS],病前情报,认知功能,自杀未遂史,以及住院患者与门诊状态)和治疗反应通过重复测量混合效应模型分析进行评估。
    在本研究纳入的365名参与者中(平均[SD]年龄,46.0[14.5]年;191[52.3%]女性),195个被随机分配到氯胺酮组,170个被随机分配到ECT组。在重复测量混合效应模型中,使用3周内和错误发现率调整后的抑郁水平,基线QIDS-SR16评分为20分或更低(-7.7分vs-5.6分)的参与者和作为门诊患者开始治疗的参与者(-8.4分vs-6.2分)报告,氯胺酮与ECT相比,QIDS-SR16下降更大.相反,基线QIDS-SR16得分超过20的人(即,非常严重的抑郁症)并开始治疗,因为住院患者在ECT治疗过程中早期报告QIDS-SR16的降低更大(-8.4vs-6.7分),但在治疗结束时,两组的评分相似(-9.0分vs-9.9分).仅在ECT组中,病前智力测量得分较高(-14.0vs-11.2分)和创伤后应激障碍诊断合并症(-16.6vs-12.0分)的参与者报告MADRS评分降低幅度更大.在第二周的治疗中,记忆记忆障碍患者的MADRS降低更大(-13.4vs-9.6分),但MADRS的水平与治疗结束时召回未受损的患者相似(-14.3vs-12.2分).其他结果在错误发现率调整后并不显著。
    在ELEKT-DECT与氯胺酮的随机临床试验的二次分析中,在患有中度或重度抑郁症的非精神病性TRD门诊患者中,静脉注射氯胺酮可观察到抑郁症的改善。提示这些患者可能会考虑氯胺酮而不是ECT治疗TRD。
    UNASSIGNED: The ELEKT-D: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) vs Ketamine in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) (ELEKT-D) trial demonstrated noninferiority of intravenous ketamine vs ECT for nonpsychotic TRD. Clinical features that can guide selection of ketamine vs ECT may inform shared decision-making for patients with TRD.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate whether selected clinical features were associated with differential improvement with ketamine vs ECT.
    UNASSIGNED: This secondary analysis of an open-label noninferiority randomized clinical trial was a multicenter study conducted at 5 US academic medical centers from April 7, 2017, to November 11, 2022. Analyses for this study, which were not prespecified in the trial protocol, were conducted from May 10 to Oct 31, 2023. The study cohort included patients with TRD, aged 21 to 75 years, who were in a current nonpsychotic depressive episode of at least moderate severity and were referred for ECT by their clinicians.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 6 infusions of ketamine or 9 treatments with ECT over 3 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: Association between baseline factors (including 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report [QIDS-SR16], Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], premorbid intelligence, cognitive function, history of attempted suicide, and inpatient vs outpatient status) and treatment response were assessed with repeated measures mixed-effects model analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 365 participants included in this study (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [14.5] years; 191 [52.3%] female), 195 were randomized to the ketamine group and 170 to the ECT group. In repeated measures mixed-effects models using depression levels over 3 weeks and after false discovery rate adjustment, participants with a baseline QIDS-SR16 score of 20 or less (-7.7 vs -5.6 points) and those starting treatment as outpatients (-8.4 vs -6.2 points) reported greater reduction in the QIDS-SR16 with ketamine vs ECT. Conversely, those with a baseline QIDS-SR16 score of more than 20 (ie, very severe depression) and starting treatment as inpatients reported greater reduction in the QIDS-SR16 earlier in course of treatment (-8.4 vs -6.7 points) with ECT, but scores were similar in both groups at the end-of-treatment visit (-9.0 vs -9.9 points). In the ECT group only, participants with higher scores on measures of premorbid intelligence (-14.0 vs -11.2 points) and with a comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis (-16.6 vs -12.0 points) reported greater reduction in the MADRS score. Those with impaired memory recall had greater reduction in MADRS during the second week of treatment (-13.4 vs -9.6 points), but the levels of MADRS were similar to those with unimpaired recall at the end-of-treatment visit (-14.3 vs -12.2 points). Other results were not significant after false discovery rate adjustment.
    UNASSIGNED: In this secondary analysis of the ELEKT-D randomized clinical trial of ECT vs ketamine, greater improvement in depression was observed with intravenous ketamine among outpatients with nonpsychotic TRD who had moderately severe or severe depression, suggesting that these patients may consider ketamine over ECT for TRD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是评估静脉应用艾氯胺酮联合右美托咪定辅助镇痛在腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)下择期剖宫产术中内脏疼痛的减轻效果。
    对2023年5月至2023年8月期间计划在CSEA下进行选择性剖宫产的269名产妇进行了评估。将产妇随机分配至接受静脉输注0.3-mg/kg艾氯胺酮联合0.5-μg/kg右美托咪定(ED组,n=76),0.5-μg/kg右美托咪定(D组,n=76),或生理盐水(C组,脐带夹紧后n=76)。主要结果是术中内脏疼痛。次要结果包括疼痛评估的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和其他术中并发症。
    ED组[9(12.7%)]的内脏痛发生率低于D组[32(43.8%)]和C组[36(48.6%),P<0.0001]。ED组探查腹腔时VAS评分也较低[0(0),P<0.0001]和缝合肌肉层[0(0),P=0.036]。D组平均动脉压[83(9)mmHg]和ED组[81(11)mmHg]高于C组[75(10)mmHg,溶液输注后P<0.0001]。D组输液后心率[80(12)bpm]低于C组[86(14)bpm]和ED组[85(12)bpm,P=0.016]。与C组和D组相比,ED组的短暂性神经或精神症状的发生率更高(76.1%vs18.9%vs23.3%,P<0.0001)。
    剖宫产时,0.3-mg/kg艾氯胺酮联合0.5-μg/kg右美托咪定可减轻内脏牵引痛并提供稳定的血流动力学。接受该方案的产妇可能会经历短暂的神经或精神症状,这些症状可以在手术结束时自发缓解。
    一些产妇在胎儿分娩过程中忍受难以形容的疼痛和不适。依维他明复合右美托咪定可减轻腰-硬联合麻醉剖宫产术中的疼痛。然而,静脉注射艾氯胺酮和右美托咪定后,产妇可能会经历噩梦,头晕,幻觉,和困倦,等。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to evaluate the effect of intravenous esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine as supplemental analgesia in reducing intraoperative visceral pain during elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 269 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under CSEA between May 2023 and August 2023 were assessed. The parturients were randomly allocated to receiving either intravenous infusion of 0.3-mg/kg esketamine combined with 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group ED, n=76), 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine (group D, n=76), or normal saline (group C, n=76) after umbilical cord clamping. The primary outcome was intraoperative visceral pain. Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain evaluation and other intraoperative complications.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of visceral pain was lower in group ED [9 (12.7%)] than in group D [32 (43.8%)] and group C [36 (48.6%), P <0.0001]. The VAS score was also lower in group ED when exploring abdominal cavity [0 (0), P <0.0001] and suturing the muscle layer [0 (0), P =0.036]. The mean arterial pressure was higher in group D [83 (9) mmHg] and group ED [81 (11) mmHg] than in group C [75 (10) mmHg, P <0.0001] after solution infusion. The heart rate after infusion of the solution was lower in group D [80 (12) bpm] than in group C [86 (14) bpm] and group ED [85 (12) bpm, P = 0.016]. The incidence of transient neurologic or mental symptoms was higher in group ED compared to group C and group D (76.1% vs 18.9% vs 23.3%, P<0.0001).
    UNASSIGNED: During cesarean section, 0.3-mg/kg esketamine combined with 0.5-μg/kg dexmedetomidine can alleviate visceral traction pain and provide stable hemodynamics. Parturients receiving this regimen may experience transient neurologic or mental symptoms that can spontaneously resolve at the end of the surgery.
    Some parturients endure experience indescribable pain and discomfort during fetal delivery. Esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine can alleviate this pain during cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. However, after intravenous injection of esketamine and dexmedetomidine, the parturients may experience nightmares, dizziness, hallucinations, and drowsiness, etc.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号