Introduction The 2020 American Heart Association\'s (AHA) Basic Life Support (BLS) curriculum focuses on cardiac arrest resuscitation with one or two rescuers, providing only limited opportunities to develop higher-level skills such as leadership, communication, and debriefing. This mixed-methods pilot study evaluated whether supplementing the traditional Heartcode BLS course with a high-fidelity teamwork simulation session improved mastery of these higher-level skills. Methods Twenty-four first-year medical students completed the pilot training during sessions offered in February and May of 2023. The program included the traditional AHA Heartcode BLS course, which ranges from two to four hours, and includes both online and in-person skills components. This was followed by a 90-minute high-fidelity simulation session consisting of two simulated resuscitations separated by a student-led plus/delta debriefing. Facilitators then debriefed the entire activity. Students completed an anonymous online survey that used a 0-10 slider scale to attribute their perceived proficiency for specific skills to the initial BLS course or the teamwork simulations and provided qualitative feedback. Results Twenty-one students (87.5%) completed the follow-up survey. Students credited their proficiency in technical skills (e.g., \"Chest Compressions\") to both sessions equally, but proficiency in higher-level skills, such as leadership, communication, and teamwork, was predominantly credited to the simulation. Additionally, students reported that the teamwork simulation promoted realism and increased self-efficacy. Conclusion Team-based resuscitation simulations using high-fidelity equipment augmented the AHA BLS course by promoting perceived competence in team dynamics domains and increasing students\' self-efficacy for participating in real hospital-based resuscitations. Studies with larger sample sizes and objective data should be performed, and the use of similar resuscitation simulations or the development of a formal team-based BLS certification course should be considered.

UNASSIGNED: Simulations are used to improve professional practice across multiple health professions; however, the application of simulations in pharmacy curricula has been limited by a lack of evidence.
UNASSIGNED: To delineate the competencies of pharmacy residents needed to assess their progress while participating in a high-fidelity simulation training program and to create a reliable assessment tool based on these competencies.
UNASSIGNED: A literature review was conducted, followed by application of a modified Delphi method. An assessment tool based on the results of these activities was drafted (in French). A second modified Delphi process was carried out to assess the reliability of the tool, and the tool was modified accordingly.
UNASSIGNED: The literature search yielded a total of 2670 articles, of which 289 were included for analysis. The first modified Delphi process involved 19 experts in the first round and 10 experts in the second round. The Cronbach α was 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.713-0.960), indicating good reliability. A total of 7 competencies were retained for inclusion in the SIMPHARM assessment tool: professionalism, leadership, teamwork, communication, critical thinking, preparation and packaging of medications, and pharmaceutical calculations. The second modified Delphi process involved 9 experts in the first round and 11 experts in the second round. The final Cronbach α was 0.877 (95% CI 0.741-0.960).
UNASSIGNED: To the authors\' knowledge, this was one of the largest studies exploring pharmacy competencies in the context of simulations. This work yielded a reliable framework for the assessment of pharmacy residents\' competencies. This assessment tool may help evaluators in assessing the competencies of pharmacy trainees after simulation training.
UNASSIGNED: Les simulations sont utilisées dans le but d’améliorer la pratique professionnelle de plusieurs professions de la santé; cependant, le manque de données probantes limite leur application dans les programmes d’enseignement en pharmacie.
UNASSIGNED: Décrire les compétences nécessaires pour évaluer le progrès des résidents en pharmacie qui participent à une formation basée sur un programme de simulation haute-fidélité; et mettre au point un outil d’évaluation fiable qui se base sur ces compétences.
UNASSIGNED: Une revue de littérature a été effectuée, avant d’appliquer une méthode Delphi modifiée et de faire l’ébauche d’un outil d’évaluation (en français) basé sur les résultats de ces activités. Une deuxième méthode Delphi modifiée a été appliquée pour évaluer la fiabilité de l’outil et celui-ci a fait l’objet de modifications en conséquence.
UNASSIGNED: La revue de littérature a donné un total de 2670 articles, parmi lesquels 289 ont été inclus à des fins d’analyse. La première méthode Delphi modifiée a impliqué 19 experts pour la première phase, et 10 pour la seconde. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach était de 0,866 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 0,713–0,960), indiquant une bonne fiabilité. Au total, 7 compétences à inclure dans l’outil d’évaluation ont été retenues: professionnalisme, leadership, travail d’équipe, communication, pensée critique, préparation et conditionnement des médicaments, et calculs pharmaceutiques. La deuxième méthode Delphi modifiée impliquait quant à elle 9 experts pour la première phase et 11 pour la seconde. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach final était de 0,877 (IC à 95 % 0,741–0,960).
UNASSIGNED: À la connaissance des auteurs, cette étude était l’une des plus importantes se penchant sur les compétences en pharmacie dans le contexte des simulations. Ce travail a donné lieu à un cadre de référence fiable pour évaluer les compétences des résidents en pharmacie. Cet outil d’évaluation pourrait aider les évaluateurs à évaluer les compétences des stagiaires à la suite d’une formation par simulation.

BACKGROUND: Education in nursing has noticed a positive effect of simulation-based education. There are many studies available on the effects of simulation-based education, but most of those involve a single institution, nonrandomized controlled trials, small sample sizes and subjective evaluations of the effects. The purpose of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effects of high-fidelity simulation, computer-based simulation, high-fidelity simulation combined with computer-based simulation, and case study on undergraduate nursing students.
METHODS: A total of 270 nursing students were recruited from five universities in China. Participants were randomly divided into four groups at each institution: the high-fidelity simulation group, the computer-based simulation group, the high-fidelity simulation combined with computer-based simulation group, and the case study group. Finally, 239 participants completed the intervention and evaluation, with 58, 67, 57, and 57 participants in each group. The data were collected at three stages: before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and three months after the intervention.
RESULTS: The demographic data and baseline evaluation indices did not significantly differ among the four groups. A statistically significant difference was not observed between the four methods for improving knowledge, interprofessional collaboration, critical thinking, caring, or interest in learning. While skill improvement differed significantly among the different groups after the intervention (p = 0.020), after three months, no difference was observed (p = 0.139). The improvement in skill in the computer-based simulation group was significantly lower at the end of the intervention than that in the high-fidelity simulation group (p = 0.048) or the high-fidelity simulation combined with computer-based simulation group (p = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing students benefit equally from four methods in cultivating their knowledge, interprofessional collaboration, critical thinking, caring, and interest in learning both immediately and over time. High-fidelity simulation and high-fidelity simulation combined with computer-based simulation improve skill more effectively than computer-based simulation in the short term. Nursing educators can select the most suitable teaching method to achieve the intended learning outcomes depending on the specific circumstances.
BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (clinical trial number: ChiCTR2400084880, date of the registration: 27/05/2024).

OBJECTIVE: Interprofessional education is recognized for its potential for collaboration and teamwork, reflecting clinical practice; however, existing literature for simulation-based interprofessional education does not include Physician Associate (PA) students. This initiative aimed to explore the students\' perception of interprofessional clinical simulation for PA students and allied health professional (AHP) students as part of our program development.
METHODS: A high-fidelity simulation session was designed and conducted for volunteering students from the PA, paramedic science, and physiotherapy courses. We used a mixed-method electronic questionnaire consisting of 15 statements rated on a numerical rating scale (0-5) and four open-ended questions with unlimited free-text responses to explore student perceptions. Inductive thematic analysis was used for qualitative analysis. The session design was underpinned by Allport\'s (intergroup) contact hypothesis with an emphasis on mutual intergroup differentiation.
RESULTS: Forty-six students participated in the simulation teaching, with 48% (n = 22) providing feedback. Overall student perception was mainly positive toward the interprofessional simulation; however, some barriers to learning were recognized. Based on the evaluation of our initiative and existing literature, we propose 5 top tips to promote an effective learning experience for students. (1) Understand the importance of interprofessional collaboration. (2) Establish clear roles. (3) Plan the scenarios in advance. (4) Maintain equal status between groups. (5) Provide clear instructions and expectations.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study of high-fidelity interprofessional simulation involving PA and AHP students. We successfully explored student perception which highlighted aspects that can impact learning. This pilot study demonstrated that interprofessional simulation is a feasible and acceptable form of learning for our students and highlighted how to improve future interprofessional simulation teaching sessions.

This research focuses on modeling heat transfer in heterogeneous media composed of stacked spheres of paraffin as a perspective polymeric phase-change material. The main goal is to study the requirements of the numerical scheme to correctly predict the thermal conductivity in a periodic system composed of an indefinitely repeated configuration of spherical particles subjected to a temperature gradient. Based on OpenFOAM, a simulation platform is created with which the resolution requirements for accurate heat transfer predictions were inferred systematically. The approach is illustrated for unit cells containing either a single sphere or a configuration of two spheres. Asymptotic convergence rates confirming the second-order accuracy of the method are established in case the grid is fine enough to have eight or more grid cells covering the distance of the diameter of a sphere. Configurations with two spheres can be created in which small gaps remain between these spheres. It was found that even the under-resolution of these small gaps does not yield inaccurate numerical solutions for the temperature field in the domain, as long as one adheres to using eight or more grid cells per sphere diameter. Overlapping and (barely) touching spheres in a configuration can be simulated with high fidelity and realistic computing costs. This study further extends to examine the effective thermal conductivity of the unit cell, particularly focusing on the volume fraction of paraffin in cases with unit cells containing a single sphere. Finally, we explore the dependence of the effective thermal conductivity for unit cells containing two spheres at different distances between them.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background: Final year medical students at the University Duisburg-Essen, Germany, are unsatisfied with their clinical judgement skills in common elective and emergency clinical situations. A competency based medical curriculum determines that clinical judgement is an essential tool in effective patient care, patient safety and limiting clinical error. Approaches to clinical judgement include either analytical, intuitive or a combination of both approaches. Novices show specific factors, which are typical in inexperienced clinicians. Simulation provides opportunities in a competency-based medical education curriculum. There is limited evidence showing that simulation can provide an effective environment for teaching and learning clinical decision-making skills. This project explores how final year medical students at the University of Duisburg-Essen approach the clinical decision-making process as well as how simulation influences this process. Methods: Ethics approval was obtained from the local ethics committee. After completing a 10-week simulation course,thirty-five students completed a clinical decision-making instrument to categorise their clinical decision-making approaches. The Novice Decision Making Model and the Cognitive Continuum Model were combined with learning theories in Simulation (Social Cognitive Theory) and used to explore and interpret data collected through questionnaires, interviews and observation. Results: The majority (60%) of students employed a predominantly analytic approach, some students showed intuitive tendencies in clinical situations. During interviews students displayed typical novice approaches to decision-making and expressed positive comments relating to simulation. Conclusions: Simulation presents an opportunity for teaching and learning clinical decision-making. Results show the need for further inquiry into learning clinical decision-making through simulation. This research provides initial evidence that simulation can be incorporated into curricular teaching of clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: First responders\' training and learning regarding how to handle a mass-casualty incident (MCI) is traditionally based on reading and/or training through computer-based scenarios, or sometimes through live simulations with actors. First responders should practice in realistic environments to narrow the theory-practice gap, and the possibility of repeating the training is important for learning. High-fidelity virtual reality (VR) is a promising tool to use for realistic and repeatable simulation training, but it needs to be further evaluated. The aim of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive description of the use of high-fidelity VR for MCI training by first responders.
METHODS: A systematic integrative literature review was used according to Whittemore and Knafl\'s descriptions. Databases investigated were PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, Web of Science, and ERIC to find papers addressing the targeted outcome. The electronic search strategy identified 797 potential studies. Seventeen studies were deemed eligible for final inclusion.
RESULTS: Training with VR enables repetition in a way not possible with live simulation, and the realism is similar, yet not as stressful. Virtual reality offers a cost-effective and safe learning environment. The usability of VR depends on the level of immersion, the technology being error-free, and the ease of use.
CONCLUSIONS: This integrative review shows that high-fidelity VR training should not rule out live simulation, but rather serve as a complement. First responders became more confident and prepared for real-life MCIs after training with high-fidelity VR, but efforts should be made to solve the technical issues found in this review to further improve the usability.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effect of simulation experience on nursing students is well established in the literature. However, an accurate simulation modality to help professional nurses enhance their clinical competence and expertise remains unexplored. The current study evaluated and contrasted the impact of two simulation modalities on nurses\' knowledge, abilities, self-efficacy, confidence, and satisfaction following a simulated clinical experience caring for chemotherapy patients.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental research design was employed in this study. The participants were divided into group A, comprising nurses exposed to the high-fidelity simulation, and group B, comprising nurses exposed to the virtual simulation.
RESULTS: The study found that nurses exposed to high-fidelity simulation and virtual simulation gained a high standard of knowledge and skills. The nurses\' post-test and post-objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) scores drastically increased after simulation exposure compared to their pre-test and pre-OSCE scores. For the group exposed to high-fidelity simulation, the mean differences were - 19.65 (pre- and post-test) and 23.85 (pre- and post-OSCE), while for the group exposed to virtual simulation, the mean differences were - 22.42 (pre- and post-test) and 20.63 (pre- and post-OSCE). All p-values indicated significant differences < 0.001. Moreover, both groups exhibited high self-efficacy, confidence, and satisfaction levels after the simulation experience. The outcomes of both simulation modalities regarding self-efficacy, confidence, and satisfaction levels indicate no significant difference, as supported by p-values of > 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity simulation and virtual simulation training effectively and efficiently advance nurses\' professional competence. The nurses exposed to high-fidelity simulation and virtual simulation gained high levels of knowledge and skills. Additionally, it increased their sense of happiness, self-worth, and self-efficacy. The simulation approach will be a potent instrument for improving nurses\' competency and fully developing their sense of expertise. Therefore, developing policies adopting simulation as part of their professional development will ensure patient safety and improve health outcomes.

In order to increase vaccination rates, the Government of Germany introduced vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 into the regular care administered by pharmacists. However, vaccination training is yet not integrated into the German pharmacy curriculum. Therefore, the Institute for Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy in Duesseldorf had developed an innovative vaccination course using high-fidelity simulation for students. To investigate the acceptance further, the course was carried out at three different German universities (Bonn, Duesseldorf, Greifswald). Students were asked to give their self-assessment before and after and satisfaction only after the training course. Responses from 33 participants from the University of Bonn, 42 from the University of Duesseldorf and 49 from the University of Greifswald were analyzed. Every participant at the respective universities showed a significant increase in their self-assessment and indicated a high level of satisfaction with the course. The results also did not differ significantly between the respective universities. Consequently, the results lead to the hypothesis that the satisfaction of pharmacy students with this kind of training using high-fidelity simulation is very high and attractive, and can be recommended for other German universities. The integration of such vaccination training into the German pharmacy curriculum might be a future step.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction: Despite the increasing popularity of high-fidelity simulation (SIM), few studies compare the effectiveness of SIM with established small-group modalities such as problem-based learning (PBL) for factual learning among pre-clinical medical undergraduates. Methods: 162 second-year medical students were randomized to two groups. The first group encountered teaching points related to the management of hypertensive emergency during a traditional PBL session, while the second group covered the same teaching points through SIM. Both groups then completed a post-test. The students were subsequently crossed-over to the opposite modality and assessed on teaching points related to the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Results: A total of 162 students participated in the study. For the hypertension case, the average proportion of correct questions for the SIM intervention was 83% compared to 70% for the PBL intervention (OR = 3.1, 95% CI [1.3, 7.2], p=0.009). For the COPD case, the average proportion of correct questions for the SIM intervention was 73% compared to 51% for the PBL intervention (OR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.8, 3.8], p < 0.001). Conclusion:Students scored significantly higher with SIM in both cases, indicating that SIM may be superior to PBL for factual learning among students with limited clinical exposure.