METHODS: A systematic integrative literature review was used according to Whittemore and Knafl\'s descriptions. Databases investigated were PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, Web of Science, and ERIC to find papers addressing the targeted outcome. The electronic search strategy identified 797 potential studies. Seventeen studies were deemed eligible for final inclusion.
RESULTS: Training with VR enables repetition in a way not possible with live simulation, and the realism is similar, yet not as stressful. Virtual reality offers a cost-effective and safe learning environment. The usability of VR depends on the level of immersion, the technology being error-free, and the ease of use.
CONCLUSIONS: This integrative review shows that high-fidelity VR training should not rule out live simulation, but rather serve as a complement. First responders became more confident and prepared for real-life MCIs after training with high-fidelity VR, but efforts should be made to solve the technical issues found in this review to further improve the usability.
方法:根据Whittemore和Knafl的描述,采用系统综合文献综述。调查的数据库是PubMed,CINAHL完成,学术搜索终极,WebofScience,和ERIC找到解决目标结果的论文。电子搜索策略确定了797项潜在研究。17项研究被认为有资格最终纳入。
结果:使用VR进行训练可以以实时模拟无法实现的方式进行重复,现实主义是相似的,但没有那么紧张。虚拟现实提供了一个经济高效且安全的学习环境。VR的可用性取决于沉浸水平,该技术没有错误,和易用性。
结论:这项综合审查表明,高保真VR训练不应排除实时模拟,而是作为一种补充。在接受高保真VR培训后,急救人员变得更加自信,并为现实生活中的MCI做好了准备,但是应该努力解决这次审查中发现的技术问题,以进一步提高可用性。