BACKGROUND: Invasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.
RESULTS: We included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Time-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical illness in critically unwell patients, characterized by refractory hypoxemia and shock. This study evaluates an early detection tool and investigates the relationship between hypoxia and circulatory shock in ARDS, to improve diagnostic precision and therapy customization. We used a porcine model, inducing ARDS with mechanical ventilation and intratracheal plus intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection. Hemodynamic changes were monitored using an Acumen IQ sensor and a ForeSight Elite sensor connected to the HemoSphere platform. We evaluated tissue damage, inflammatory response, and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) alterations using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry. The results showed severe hypotension and increased heart rates post-LPS exposure, with a notable rise in the hypotension prediction index (HPI) during acute lung injury (p = 0.024). Tissue oxygen saturation dropped considerably in the right brain region. Interestingly, post-injury HIF-2α levels were lower at the end of the experiment. Our findings imply that the HPI can effectively predict ARDS-related hypotension. HIF expression levels may serve as possible markers of rapid ARDS progression. Further research should be conducted on the clinical value of this novel approach in critical care, as well as the relationship between the HIF pathway and ARDS-associated hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Fluid administration is the first line treatment in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis and septic shock. While fluid boluses administration can be titrated by predicting preload dependency, the amount of other forms of fluids may be more complex to be evaluated. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital, to assess the ratio between fluids given as boluses and total administered fluid intake during early phases of ICU stay, and to evaluate the impact of fluid strategy on ICU mortality. Data related to fluid administration during the first four days of ICU stay were exported from an electronic health records system (ICCA®, Philips Healthcare). Demographic data, severity score, norepinephrine dose at ICU admission, overall fluid balance and the percentage of different fluid components of the overall volume administered were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, evaluating the association with ICU survival.
RESULTS: We analyzed 220 patients admitted with septic shock and sepsis-induced hypotension from 1st July 2021 to 31st December 2023. Fluid boluses and maintenance represented 49.3% ± 22.8 of the overall fluid intake, being balanced solution the most represented (40.4% ± 22.0). The fluid volume for drug infusion represented 34.0% ± 2.9 of the total fluid intake, while oral or via nasogastric tube fluid intake represented 18.0% ± 15.7 of the total fluid intake. Fluid volume given as boluses represented 8.6% of the total fluid intake over the four days, with a reduction from 25.1% ± 24.0 on Day 1 to 4.8% ± 8.7 on Day 4. A positive fluid balance [OR 1.167 (1.029-1.341); p = 0.021] was the most important factor associated with ICU mortality. Non-survivors (n = 66; 30%) received a higher amount of overall inputs than survivors only on Day 1 [2493 mL vs. 1855 mL; p = 0.022].
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis of fluids given over the early phases of septic shock and sepsis-induced hypotension showed that the overall volume given by boluses ranges from about 25% on Day 1 to about 5% on Day 4 from ICU admission. Our data confirms that a positive fluid balance over the first 4 days of ICU is associated with mortality.

BACKGROUND: The selection of adequate indicators of tissue hypoxia for guiding the resuscitation process of septic patients is a highly relevant issue. Current guidelines advocate for the use of lactate as sole metabolic marker, which may be markedly limited, and the integration of different variables seems more adequate. In this study, we explored the metabolic profile and its implications in the response to the administration of a fluid challenge in early septic shock patients.
METHODS: Observational study including septic shock patients within 24 h of ICU admission, monitored with a cardiac output estimation system, with ongoing resuscitation. Hemodynamic and metabolic variables were measured before and after a fluid challenge (FC). A two-step cluster analysis was used to define the baseline metabolic profile, including lactate, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (PcvaCO2), and PcvaCO2 corrected by the difference in arterial-to-venous oxygen content (PcvaCO2/CavO2).
RESULTS: Seventy-seven fluid challenges were analyzed. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct metabolic profiles at baseline. Cluster A exhibited lower ScvO2, higher PcvaCO2, and lower PcvaCO2/CavO2. Increases in cardiac output (CO) were associated with increases in VO2 exclusively in cluster A. Baseline isolated metabolic variables did not correlate with VO2 response, and changes in ScvO2 and PcvaCO2 were associated to VO2 increase only in cluster A.
CONCLUSIONS: In a population of early septic shock patients, two distinct metabolic profiles were identified, suggesting tissue hypoxia or dysoxia. Integrating metabolic variables enhances the ability to detect those patients whose VO2 might increase as results of fluid administration.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the accuracy of non-calibrated multi-beat analysis continuous cardiac output (CCOMBA), against calibrated pulse-contour analysis continuous cardiac output (CCOPCA) during a passive leg raise (PLR) and/or a fluid challenge (FC).
UNASSIGNED: Observational, single-centre, prospective study.
UNASSIGNED: Tertiary academic medical intensive care unit, Lyon, France.
UNASSIGNED: Adult patients receiving norepinephrine, monitored by CCOPCA, and in which a PLR and/or a FC was indicated.
UNASSIGNED: CCOMBA and CCOPCA were recorded prior to and during the PLR/FC to evaluate bias and evaluate changes in CCOMBA and CCOPCA (∆%CCOMBA and ∆%CCOPCA). Fluid responsiveness was identified by an increase >15% in calibrated cardiac output after FC, to identify the optimal ∆%CCOMBA threshold during PLR to predict fluid responsiveness.
UNASSIGNED: 29 patients (median age 68 [IQR: 57-74]) performed 28 PLR and 16 FC. The bias between methods increased with higher CCOPCA values, with a percentage error of 64% (95%confidence interval: 52%-77%). ∆%CCOMBA adequately tracked changes in ∆%CCOPCA with an angular bias of 2 ± 29°. ∆%CCOMBA during PLR had an AUROC of 0.92 (P < 0.05), with an optimal threshold >14% to predict fluid responsiveness (sensitivity: 0.99, specificity: 0.87).
UNASSIGNED: CCOMBA showed a non-constant bias and a percentage error >30% against calibrated CCOPCA, but an adequate ability to track changes in CCOPCA and to predict fluid responsiveness.

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method hemodynamic monitoring systems on short-term graft and patient outcomes during living donor liver transplantation in adult patients. Materials and Methods: Overall, 163 adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between January 2018 and March 2022 and met the study inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on the hemodynamic monitoring systems used during surgery: the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method group (n = 73) and the pulse index continuous cardiac output group (n = 90). The groups were compared with respect to preoperative clinicodemographic features (age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score), intraoperative clinical characteristics, and postoperative biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and platelet count). Results: There were no significant between-group differences with respect to recipient age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, Child, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, ejection fraction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, surgery time, anhepatic phase, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, erythrocyte suspension use, human albumin use, crystalloid use, urine output, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay. However, there was a significant difference in fresh frozen plasma use (p < 0.001) and platelet use (p = 0.037). Conclusions: The clinical and biochemical outcomes are not significantly different between pulse index continuous cardiac output and MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method as hemodynamic monitoring systems in living donor liver transplantation. However, the MostCare Pressure Recording Analytical Method is more economical and minimally invasive.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) offer the benefit of remote monitoring and decision making and find particular applications in special populations such as the elderly. Less transportation, reduced costs, prompt diagnosis, a sense of security, and continuous real-time monitoring are the main advantages. On the other hand, less physician-patient interactions and the technology barrier in the elderly pose specific problems in remote monitoring. CIEDs nowadays are abundant and are mostly represented by rhythm control/monitoring devices, whereas hemodynamic remote monitoring devices are gaining popularity and are evolving and becoming refined. Future directions include the involvement of artificial intelligence, yet disparities of availability, lack of follow-up data, and insufficient patient education are still areas to be improved. This review aims to describe the role of CIED in the very elderly and highlight the merits and possible drawbacks.

In clinical practice, there is vast knowledge regarding the evaluation of macrocirculatory parameters, such as systemic blood pressure and cardiac output, for the hemodynamic monitoring of patients. However, assessment of the microcirculation has not yet been incorporated into the bedside armamentarium. Hand-held intravital video microscopy enables the direct, noninvasive, evaluation of the sublingual microcirculation at the bedside, offering insights into the status of the systemic microcirculation. It is easily performed and may be employed in several clinical settings, providing immediate results that may help guide patient management. Therefore, the incorporation of hand-held intravital video microscopy into clinical practice may lead to tremendous improvements in the quality of care of critical, unstable patients or offer new data in the evaluation of patients with chronic diseases, especially those with microcirculatory involvement, such as occurs in diabetes.

BACKGROUND: In the perioperative setting, the most accurate way to continuously measure arterial blood pressure (ABP) is using an arterial catheter. Surrogate methods such as finger cuff have been developed to allow non-invasive measurements and are increasingly used, but need further evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between two devices for the measurement of ABP during neuroradiological procedure.
METHODS: This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study. All consecutive patients undergoing a neuroradiological procedure were eligible. Patients who needed arterial catheter for blood pressure measurement were included. During neuroradiological procedure, ABP (systolic, mean and diatolic blood pressure) was measured with two different technologies: radial artery catheter and Nexfin. Bland-Altman and error grid analyses were performed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between devices.
RESULTS: From March 2022 to November 2022, we included 50 patients, mostly ASA 3 (60%) and required a cerebral embolization (94%) under general anaesthesia (96%). Error grid analysis showed that 99% of non-invasive ABP measures obtained with the Nexfin were located in the risk zone A or B. However, 65.7% of hypertension events and 41% of hypotensive events were respectively not detected by Nexfin. Compared to the artery catheter, a significant relationship was found for SAP (r2 = 0.78) and MAP (r2 = 0.80) with the Nexfin (p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were respectively 9.6 mmHg (- 15.6 to 34.8 mmHg) and - 0.8 mmHg (- 17.2 to 15.6 mmHg), for SAP and MAP.
CONCLUSIONS: Nexfin is not strictly interchangeable with artery catheter for ABP measuring. Further studies are needed to define its clinical use during neuroradiological procedure.
BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05283824.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the use of the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM), an hemodynamic monitoring system, in evaluating intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and to evaluate if the decision to refer patients to a ordinary ward or to a Cardiac Step-Down Unit (CSDU) after the intervention on the basis of intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring could be more cost-effective.
METHODS: After preoperative clinical evaluation, 44 patients were divided in this non-randomised study into two groups according to their postoperative destination: Group 1-ward (N=22) and Group 2-CSDU (N=22). All patients underwent monitoring with PRAM during the intervention and in the 24 postoperative hours, measuring several indices of myocardial contractility and other hemodynamic variables.
RESULTS: According to the variability of two parameters, Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation, patients were classified as stable or unstable. Unstable patients showed a significant alteration in several hemodynamic indices, in comparison to stable ones. According to the intraoperative monitoring, eight high risk patients could have been sent to an ordinary ward due to their stability, with a reduction in the improper use of CSDU and, consequently, in costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic monitoring with PRAM can be useful in these patients, both for intraoperative management and for the choice of the more appropriate postoperative setting, possibly reducing the improper use of CSDU for hemodynamically stable patients who are judged to be at high risk preoperatively, and re-evaluating low surgical risk patients with an unstable intraoperative pattern, with a possible reduction in costs.