Hemodynamic monitoring

血流动力学监测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有创血压测量是指导创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的血流动力学管理和连续脑灌注压的院内金标准。它的院前使用是有争议的,因为它可能会延迟进一步的护理。这项研究的主要目的是检验以下假设:接受院前动脉插管的严重创伤性脑损伤患者,与那些在医院插管的人相比,在现场到达和头部首次计算机断层扫描(CT)之间的时间不超过十分钟。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括18岁及以上的孤立性严重TBI和院前紧急麻醉诱导患者,这些患者于1月1日在格拉茨大学医院复苏室接受治疗,2015年12月31日,2022年。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来测试现场到达和第一次头部CT之间的时间间隔的非劣效性(边缘=十分钟)。
    结果:我们在最终分析中纳入了181例患者的数据。87例患者(48%)进行院前动脉导管插入。在现场到达和首次头颅CT之间的中位(25-75百分位数)持续时间为院前动脉插管73(61-92)分钟,在复苏室中动脉插管75(60-93)分钟。院前动脉线插入在10分钟的边缘内明显不下,中位差异为1分钟(95%CI-6至7,p=0.003)。
    结论:与医院内插管相比,接受院前动脉插管的孤立性重型颅脑损伤患者的现场到达与首次头颅CT之间的时间间隔没有延长。这支持由经验丰富的提供者进行的早期院外动脉插管。
    BACKGROUND: Invasive blood pressure measurement is the in-hospital gold standard to guide hemodynamic management and consecutively cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Its prehospital use is controversial since it may delay further care. The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients with severe traumatic brain injury who receive prehospital arterial cannulation, compared to those with in-hospital cannulation, do not have a prolonged time between on-scene arrival and first computed tomography (CT) of the head by more than ten minutes.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included patients 18 years and older with isolated severe TBI and prehospital induction of emergency anaesthesia who received treatment in the resuscitation room of the University Hospital of Graz between January 1st, 2015, and December 31st, 2022. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for non-inferiority (margin = ten minutes) of the time interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT.
    RESULTS: We included data of 181 patients in the final analysis. Prehospital arterial line insertion was performed in 87 patients (48%). Median (25-75th percentile) durations between on-scene arrival and first head CT were 73 (61-92) min for prehospital arterial cannulation and 75 (60-93) min for arterial cannulation in the resuscitation room. Prehospital arterial line insertion was significantly non-inferior within a margin of ten minutes with a median difference of 1 min (95% CI - 6 to 7, p = 0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: Time-interval between on-scene arrival and first head CT in patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital arterial cannulation was not prolonged compared to those with in-hospital cannulation. This supports early out-of-hospital arterial cannulation performed by experienced providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在围手术期设置中,连续测量动脉血压(ABP)最准确的方法是使用动脉导管.替代方法,如指套已经开发,以允许非侵入性的测量,并越来越多地使用,但需要进一步评估。这项研究的目的是评估在神经放射学过程中测量ABP的两种设备之间的准确性和临床一致性。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,单心,观察性研究。所有连续接受神经放射学手术的患者均符合条件。包括需要动脉导管测量血压的患者。在神经放射学手术期间,ABP(收缩压,使用两种不同的技术测量平均血压和血压):radial动脉导管和Nexfin。进行Bland-Altman和误差网格分析以评估设备之间的准确性和临床一致性。
    结果:从2022年3月到2022年11月,我们包括50名患者,主要是ASA3(60%),需要在全身麻醉(96%)下进行脑栓塞(94%)。误差网格分析表明,使用Nexfin获得的非侵入性ABP测量值的99%位于风险区域A或B。Nexfin未检测到65.7%的高血压事件和41%的低血压事件。与动脉导管相比,SAP(r2=0.78)和MAP(r2=0.80)与Nexfin存在显着关系(p<0.001)。偏差和一致性界限(LOA)分别为9.6mmHg(-15.6至34.8mmHg)和-0.8mmHg(-17.2至15.6mmHg),SAP和MAP。
    结论:Nexfin不能严格与用于ABP测量的动脉导管互换。需要进一步的研究来确定其在神经放射学过程中的临床用途。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.gov,注册号:NCT05283824。
    BACKGROUND: In the perioperative setting, the most accurate way to continuously measure arterial blood pressure (ABP) is using an arterial catheter. Surrogate methods such as finger cuff have been developed to allow non-invasive measurements and are increasingly used, but need further evaluation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between two devices for the measurement of ABP during neuroradiological procedure.
    METHODS: This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study. All consecutive patients undergoing a neuroradiological procedure were eligible. Patients who needed arterial catheter for blood pressure measurement were included. During neuroradiological procedure, ABP (systolic, mean and diatolic blood pressure) was measured with two different technologies: radial artery catheter and Nexfin. Bland-Altman and error grid analyses were performed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical concordance between devices.
    RESULTS: From March 2022 to November 2022, we included 50 patients, mostly ASA 3 (60%) and required a cerebral embolization (94%) under general anaesthesia (96%). Error grid analysis showed that 99% of non-invasive ABP measures obtained with the Nexfin were located in the risk zone A or B. However, 65.7% of hypertension events and 41% of hypotensive events were respectively not detected by Nexfin. Compared to the artery catheter, a significant relationship was found for SAP (r2 = 0.78) and MAP (r2 = 0.80) with the Nexfin (p < 0.001). Bias and limits of agreement (LOA) were respectively 9.6 mmHg (- 15.6 to 34.8 mmHg) and - 0.8 mmHg (- 17.2 to 15.6 mmHg), for SAP and MAP.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nexfin is not strictly interchangeable with artery catheter for ABP measuring. Further studies are needed to define its clinical use during neuroradiological procedure.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05283824.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肌缺血期间心脏血流动力学功能障碍的非侵入性和实时光学检测仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种近红外光谱装置来监测大鼠心肌血流动力学。设计良好的系统可以通过经典的上肢缺血测试准确反映血流动力学变化。通过断开与呼吸机的连接进行全身性缺氧,并通过冠状动脉活结结扎进行心肌缺血以监测心肌血流动力学。当发生全身缺氧时,ΔHbR和ΔtHb显著增加,而ΔHbO迅速下降。当冠状动脉血流被滑结阻塞时,心胸ΔHbO立即开始下降,而ΔHbR也显著增加。同时,心肌缺血过程中SpO2没有明显变化,而SpO2在全身缺氧期间显著降低。这些结果表明,心胸血流动力学源于心肌缺血。这项初步研究证明了非侵入性,低成本光学监测大鼠心脏氧合功能障碍。
    Noninvasive and real-time optical detection of cardiac hemodynamics dysfunction during myocardial ischemia remains challenging. In this study, we developed a near-infrared spectroscopy device to monitor rats\' myocardial hemodynamics. The well-designed system can accurately reflect the hemodynamics changes by the classic upper limb ischemia test. Systemic hypoxia by disconnecting to the ventilator and cardiac ischemia by coronary artery slipknot ligation was conducted to monitor myocardial hemodynamics. When systemic hypoxia occurred, ΔHbR and ΔtHb increased significantly, whereas ΔHbO decreased rapidly. When coronary blood flow was obstructed by slipknots, cardiothoracic ΔHbO immediately begins to decline, while ΔHbR also significantly increases. Simultaneously, SpO2 did not show any obvious changes during myocardial ischemia, while SpO2 decreased significantly during systemic hypoxia. These results demonstrated that cardiothoracic hemodynamics stemmed from myocardial ischemia. This pilot study demonstrated the practicality of noninvasive, low-cost optical monitoring for cardiac oxygenation dysfunction in rats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术中目标导向的血液动力学治疗(GDHT)是强化恢复方案的基石。我们假设使用先进的无创性术中血流动力学监测系统来指导GDHT可以降低术中低血压(IOH)并改善胰腺切除术期间的灌注。
    方法:监护仪使用机器学习产生低血压预测指数来预测低血压发作。临床决策算法使用低血压预测指数和血液动力学数据来指导术中液体与加压管理。预实施(PRE),患者被置于监护仪上,并按照常规进行管理.实施后(POST),麻醉团队接受了有关算法的教育,并被要求使用GDHT指南.每20s收集血液动力学数据点(8942个PRE和26,638个POST测量)。我们比较了IOH(平均动脉压<65mmHg),两组之间的心脏指数>2,每搏输出量变化<12。
    结果:10例患者为PRE组,24例患者为POST组。在POST组中,微创切除较少(4.2%对30.0%,P=0.07),更多的胰十二指肠切除术(75.0%对20.0%,P<0.01),和更长的手术时间(329.0+108.2分钟与225.1+92.8分钟,P=0.01)。实施后,血流动力学参数改善。IOH减少了33.3%(5.2%±0.1%对7.8%±0.3%,P<0.01,心脏指数增加31.6%>2.0(83.7%+0.2%vs63.6%+0.5%,P<0.01),每搏量变化增加37.6%<12(73.2%+0.3%对53.2%+0.5%,P<0.01)。
    结论:先进的术中血流动力学监测以预测IOH结合GDHT的临床决策树可以改善胰腺切除术期间的术中血流动力学参数。这需要在更大的研究中进行进一步的调查。
    BACKGROUND: Intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols. We hypothesized that use of an advanced noninvasive intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring system to guide GDHT may decrease intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and improve perfusion during pancreatic resection.
    METHODS: The monitor uses machine learning to produce the Hypotension Prediction Index to predict hypotensive episodes. A clinical decision-making algorithm uses the Hypotension Prediction Index and hemodynamic data to guide intraoperative fluid versus pressor management. Pre-implementation (PRE), patients were placed on the monitor and managed per usual. Post-implementation (POST), anesthesia teams were educated on the algorithm and asked to use the GDHT guidelines. Hemodynamic data points were collected every 20 s (8942 PRE and 26,638 POST measurements). We compared IOH (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), cardiac index >2, and stroke volume variation <12 between the two groups.
    RESULTS: 10 patients were in the PRE and 24 in the POST groups. In the POST group, there were fewer minimally invasive resections (4.2% versus 30.0%, P = 0.07), more pancreaticoduodenectomies (75.0% versus 20.0%, P < 0.01), and longer operative times (329.0 + 108.2 min versus 225.1 + 92.8 min, P = 0.01). After implementation, hemodynamic parameters improved. There was a 33.3% reduction in IOH (5.2% ± 0.1% versus 7.8% ± 0.3%, P < 0.01, a 31.6% increase in cardiac index >2.0 (83.7% + 0.2% versus 63.6% + 0.5%, P < 0.01), and a 37.6% increase in stroke volume variation <12 (73.2% + 0.3% versus 53.2% + 0.5%, P < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Advanced intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring to predict IOH combined with a clinical decision-making tree for GDHT may improve intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during pancreatectomy. This warrants further investigation in larger studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:强调氧气输送(DO2)及其监测,以帮助术后目标导向治疗(GDT)改善围手术期结果,如与多种发病率和死亡率相关的高风险心脏手术后急性肾损伤(AKI)。然而,DO2监测既不是常规的,也不是术后的,并且当前的方法是侵入性的并且仅产生间歇性DO2趋势。因此,我们提出了一种同时整合心输出量(CO)的新算法,来自EdwardsLifeSciencesClearSightSystem®和MasimoSETPulseCO-Oximetry®的血红蛋白(Hb)和氧饱和度(SpO2),实时DO2趋势。
    方法:我们的算法是用4个组件系统地构建的——用PuTTY绘制数据的机器接口,使用解析进行数据提取,数据同步,和使用图形用户界面的实时DO2演示。验证Hb读数。
    结果:我们的算法在我们招募的心脏手术患者中成功实施了93%(61人中有57人)。研究了DO2趋势和AKI。
    结论:我们展示了一种新颖的概念证明和可行性,实时,非侵入性DO2监测,每个病人作为自己的控制。我们的研究还为未来的研究奠定了基础,旨在确定个性化的关键DO2阈值并优化DO2作为GDT的组成部分,以提高围手术期心脏手术的预后。
    OBJECTIVE: Oxygen delivery (DO2) and its monitoring are highlighted to aid postoperative goal directed therapy (GDT) to improve perioperative outcomes such as acute kidney injury (AKI) after high-risk cardiac surgeries associated with multiple morbidities and mortality. However, DO2 monitoring is neither routine nor done postoperatively, and current methods are invasive and only produce intermittent DO2 trends. Hence, we proposed a novel algorithm that simultaneously integrates cardiac output (CO), hemoglobin (Hb) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) from the Edwards Life Sciences ClearSight System® and Masimo SET Pulse CO-Oximetry® to produce a continuous, real-time DO2 trend.
    METHODS: Our algorithm was built systematically with 4 components - machine interface to draw data with PuTTY, data extraction with parsing, data synchronization, and real-time DO2 presentation using a graphic-user interface. Hb readings were validated.
    RESULTS: Our algorithm was implemented successfully in 93% (n = 57 out of 61) of our recruited cardiac surgical patients. DO2 trends and AKI were studied.
    CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a novel proof-of-concept and feasibility of continuous, real-time, non-invasive DO2 monitoring, with each patient serving as their own control. Our study also lays the foundation for future investigations aimed at identifying personalized critical DO2 thresholds and optimizing DO2 as an integral part of GDT to enhance outcomes in perioperative cardiac surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术中低血压是常见的,并与器官损伤有关。低血压不仅可以在手术期间发生,但此后也是如此。手术后,大多数患者在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)接受治疗.PACU低血压的发生率在很大程度上是未知的-可能部分是因为PACU患者通常间歇性地监测动脉压。因此,我们旨在评估发病率,持续时间,从非心脏手术中恢复的低危患者的PACU低血压的严重程度。在这项观察性研究中,我们用指套进行了盲连续无创动脉压监测(ClearSight系统;EdwardsLifesciences,Irvine,CA,美国)在PACU的非心脏手术中恢复的100名患者。我们将PACU低血压定义为平均动脉压(MAP)<65mmHg。患者有连续的指套监测中位数(第25百分位数,第75百分位数),共64分钟(44至91分钟)。只有3名患者(3%)出现PACU低血压至少连续1分钟。这三名患者的PACU低血压累积时间为4、4和2分钟;MAP低于65mmHg的区域为17、9和9mmHgx分钟;时间加权平均MAP低于65mmHg,分别为0.5、0.3和0.2mmHg。在PACU治疗期间给予的晶体液患者的中位体积为200(100至400)ml。在PACU治疗期间,均未给予胶体或血管加压药。在从非心脏手术中恢复的低风险患者中,PACU低血压的发生率非常低,少数PACU低血压发作时间短,严重程度适中.
    Intraoperative hypotension is common and associated with organ injury. Hypotension can not only occur during surgery, but also thereafter. After surgery, most patients are treated in post-anesthesia care units (PACU). The incidence of PACU hypotension is largely unknown - presumably in part because arterial pressure is usually monitored intermittently in PACU patients. We therefore aimed to evaluate the incidence, duration, and severity of PACU hypotension in low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery. In this observational study, we performed blinded continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring with finger-cuffs (ClearSight system; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) in 100 patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery in the PACU. We defined PACU hypotension as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg. Patients had continuous finger-cuff monitoring for a median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) of 64 (44 to 91) minutes. Only three patients (3%) had PACU hypotension for at least one consecutive minute. These three patients had 4, 4, and 2 cumulative minutes of PACU hypotension; areas under a MAP of 65 mmHg of 17, 9, and 9 mmHg x minute; and time-weighted averages MAP less than 65 mmHg of 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 mmHg. The median volume of crystalloid fluid patients were given during PACU treatment was 200 (100 to 400) ml. None was given colloids or a vasopressor during PACU treatment. In low-risk patients recovering from non-cardiac surgery, the incidence of PACU hypotension was very low and the few episodes of PACU hypotension were short and of modest severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:经过处理的脑电图(pEEG)可以帮助临床医生优化全身麻醉的深度。避免过度的麻醉深度可以减少术中低血压和对血管加压药的需求。我们测试了以下假设:与非pEEG引导相比,pEEG引导的全身麻醉可减少血管手术患者将术中平均动脉压保持在65mmHg以上所需的去甲肾上腺素的量。
    方法:随机对照临床试验。
    方法:汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心,汉堡,德国。
    方法:110例血管手术患者。
    方法:pEEG引导全身麻醉。
    方法:我们的主要终点是从麻醉诱导开始到手术结束的平均去甲肾上腺素输注速率。
    结果:分析96例患者。平均±标准偏差平均去甲肾上腺素输注速率在分配给pEEG指导的患者中为0.08±0.04μgkg-1min-1,在分配给非pEEG指导的患者中为0.12±0.09μgkg-1min-1(平均差异0.04μgkg-1min-1,95%置信区间0.01至0.07μgkg-1min-1,p=0.004)。分配给pEEG引导的全身麻醉与非pEEG引导的全身麻醉的患者,时间加权最小肺泡浓度中位数为0.7(0.6,0.8)对0.8(0.7,0.8)(p=0.006),患者状态指数的时间百分比中位数为<25/12(1,41)%对23(3,49)%(p=0.279).
    结论:pEEG引导-与非pEEG引导-全身麻醉相比,血管手术患者保持平均动脉压高于65mmHg所需的去甲肾上腺素量减少了约三分之一。由pEEG引导的全身麻醉导致的术中去甲肾上腺素需求降低是否转化为改善以患者为中心的结果仍有待更大的试验确定。
    Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) may help clinicians optimize depth of general anesthesia. Avoiding excessive depth of anesthesia may reduce intraoperative hypotension and the need for vasopressors. We tested the hypothesis that pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduces the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep intraoperative mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg in patients having vascular surgery.
    Randomized controlled clinical trial.
    University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
    110 patients having vascular surgery.
    pEEG-guided general anesthesia.
    Our primary endpoint was the average norepinephrine infusion rate from the beginning of induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery.
    96 patients were analyzed. The mean ± standard deviation average norepinephrine infusion rate was 0.08 ± 0.04 μg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to pEEG-guided and 0.12 ± 0.09 μg kg-1 min-1 in patients assigned to non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia (mean difference 0.04 μg kg-1 min-1, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.07 μg kg-1 min-1, p = 0.004). Patients assigned to pEEG-guided versus non-pEEG-guided general anesthesia, had a median time-weighted minimum alveolar concentration of 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) versus 0.8 (0.7, 0.8) (p = 0.006) and a median percentage of time Patient State Index was <25 of 12 (1, 41) % versus 23 (3, 49) % (p = 0.279).
    pEEG-guided - compared to non-pEEG-guided - general anesthesia reduced the amount of norepinephrine needed to keep mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg by about a third in patients having vascular surgery. Whether reduced intraoperative norepinephrine requirements resulting from pEEG-guided general anesthesia translate into improved patient-centered outcomes remains to be determined in larger trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于减少术后肺部并发症(PPC)的最有效策略尚未达成共识。这项研究假设,与标准护理(SOC)策略相比,目标导向的液体疗法(GDFT)方案可减少接受选择性腹部开放手术的患者的PPC发生率。
    方法:随机化,prospective,对照研究,从2012年5月到2014年12月,与ASAI,接受腹部开放手术的II或III患者,持续至少120分钟,在全身麻醉下,随机分为SOC和GDFT组。在SOC中,液体管理是根据麻醉师的判断。在GDFT中,干预方案,基于根据血压和δ脉压的推注输注,已应用。术后由一名麻醉医师对PPC发病率的分组情况进行评估,死亡率,住院时间(LOHS)。
    结果:SOC组42例,GDFT组43例。SOC中的19名患者(45%)和GDFT中的6名患者(14%)具有至少一个PPC(p=0.003)。两组之间的死亡率或LOHS没有差异。在PPC患者中,4人死亡(25%)与无PPC患者的2例死亡(3%)相比(p=0.001)。在有PPC的组中LOHS的中位数为14.5天,在无PPC的组中为9天(p=0.001)。
    结论:GDFT方案导致PPC率降低;然而,LOHS和死亡率并未降低.
    BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the most effective strategy for Postoperative Pulmonary Complication (PPC) reduction. This study hypothesized that a Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) protocol of infusion of predetermined boluses reduces the occurrence of PPC in patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgeries when compared with Standard of Care (SOC) strategy.
    METHODS: Randomized, prospective, controlled study, conducted from May 2012 to December 2014, with ASA I, II or III patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries, lasting at least 120 min, under general anesthesia, randomized into the SOC and the GDFT group. In the SOC, fluid administration was according to the anesthesiologist\'s discretion. In the GDFT, the intervention protocol, based on bolus infusion according to blood pressure and delta pulse pressure, was applied. Patients were postoperatively evaluated by an anesthesiologist blinded to the group allocation regarding PPC incidence, mortality, and Length of Hospital Stay (LOHS).
    RESULTS: Forty-two patients in the SOC group and 43 in the GDFT group. Nineteen patients (45%) in the SOC and 6 in the GDFT (14%) had at least one PPC (p = 0.003). There was no difference in mortality or LOHS between the groups. Among the patients with PPC, four died (25%), compared to two deaths in patients without PPC (3%) (p = 0.001). The LOHS had a median of 14.5 days in the group with PPC and 9 days in the group without PPC (p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The GDFT protocol resulted in a lower rate of PPC; however, the LOHS and mortality did not reduce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头颈部癌的游离皮瓣重建与围手术期并发症的高风险相关。与围手术期发病率相关的可改变的危险因素之一是术中低血压(IOH)。这项初步研究的主要目的是确定术中使用目标导向的血液动力学疗法(GDHT)是否与该人群中IOH事件数量的减少有关。
    A研究前后设计。将术中GDHT的患者与实施GDHT之前的患者进行比较。主要结果是IOH发作次数定义为连续5分钟或更长时间,平均动脉压<65mmHg。次要结局包括术后主要发病率和30天死亡率。
    共纳入414例患者。这些被分成两组。对照组(n=346;2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日),和监测组(n=68;2020年1月1日至2021年5月1日)。对照组和监测组之间的术中给药液体量中位数相似(2250四分位距[IQR][1607-3050]vs.2210IQR[1700-2807]mL)。监测组发现去甲肾上腺素和多巴酚丁胺的使用量增加(分别为,1.2%与5.9%和2.4%与30.9%;p<0.05)。当调整混杂因素时(合并症,估计失血量,和麻醉持续时间)IOH事件的发生率比率(95%置信区间)为0.94(0.86-1.03),p=0.24。两组的术后皮瓣发生率和内科并发症没有差异。
    即使在监测组中使用血管加压药/强迫剂较高,两组的IOH发作次数以及术后发病率和死亡率相似.血液动力学管理的进一步变化将需要在GDHT流体算法中使用特定的血压目标。
    UNASSIGNED: Free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer is associated with a high risk of perioperative complications. One of the modifiable risk factors associated with perioperative morbidity is intraoperative hypotension (IOH). The main aim of this pilot study is to determine if the intraoperative use of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) is associated with a reduction in the number of IOH events in this population.
    UNASSIGNED: A before-and-after study design. The patients who had intraoperative GDHT were compared to patients from a previous period before the implementation of GDHT. The primary outcome was the number of IOH episodes defined as five or more successive minutes with a mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg. The secondary outcomes included major postoperative morbidity and 30-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 414 patients were included. These were divided into two groups. The control group (n = 346; January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019), and the monitored group (n = 68; January 1, 2020, to May 1, 2021). The median intraoperative administered fluid volume was similar between the control and monitored groups (2250 interquartile range [IQR] [1607-3050] vs. 2210 IQR [1700-2807] mL). The monitored group was found to have an increased use of norepinephrine and dobutamine (respectively, 1.2% vs. 5.9% and 2.4% vs. 30.9%; p < 0.05). When adjusting for confounders (comorbidities, estimated blood loss, and duration of anesthesia) the incidence rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of number of IOH events was 0.94 (0.86-1.03), p = 0.24. The rate of postoperative flap and medical complications did not differ between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Even though the use of vasopressors/inotropes was higher in the monitored group, the number of IOH episodes and postoperative morbidity and mortality were similar between the two groups. Further change in hemodynamic management will require the use of specific blood pressure targets in the GDHT fluid algorithm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:越来越多的证据表明,血压管理可能与心脏手术后的终末器官功能障碍有关。本研究旨在探讨术中低血压(IOH)对不良神经系统预后和死亡率的影响。
    方法:单中心回顾性队列研究。
    方法:心脏和糖尿病中心BadOeynhausenNRW,鲁尔-波鸿大学.
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了31,315名在2009年1月至2018年12月期间在作者机构接受择期心脏手术的成年患者。
    方法:除辅助装置植入外的所有心脏手术,器官移植,紧急手术。
    结果:神经系统不良结局定义为术后谵妄和卒中。IOH定义为平均动脉压低于60mmHg持续>2分钟。记录IOH发作的频率和累积IOH持续时间。通过未调整的统计分析和多元逻辑回归分析检查了IOH与不良神经系统结局之间的关联。八百四十九名(百分之二点九)病人发生术后中风,2,401例(7.7%)患者发生术后谵妄。在多元逻辑回归分析中,IOH发作频率与术后谵妄独立相关(比值比1.02,95%CI1.003-1.03,p<0.001),而它与卒中之间没有关联.
    结论:这项大型回顾性单中心队列研究表明,心脏手术后IOH发作的增加与发生术后谵妄的风险相关。这可能对仔细和精确的血流动力学监测和积极治疗具有重要的临床意义。尤其是术后谵妄风险增加的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: There is accumulating evidence that blood pressure management might be associated with end-organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) on adverse neurologic outcomes and mortality.
    METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: The Heart and Diabetes Centre Bad Oeynhausen NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 31,315 adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery at the authors\' institution between January 2009 and December 2018.
    METHODS: All cardiac surgery procedures except assist device implantation, organ transplantation, and emergency surgery.
    RESULTS: Adverse neurologic outcomes were defined as postoperative delirium and stroke. IOH was defined as mean arterial pressure below 60 mmHg for >2 minutes. The frequency of IOH episodes and the cumulative IOH duration were recorded. The association between IOH and adverse neurologic outcomes was examined with unadjusted statistical analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis. Eight hundred forty-nine (2.9%) patients developed postoperative stroke, and 2,401 (7.7%) patients developed postoperative delirium. The frequency of IOH episodes was independently associated with postoperative delirium in the multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.003-1.03, p < 0.001), whereas there was no association between it and stroke.
    CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective monocentric cohort study revealed that increased episodes of IOH were associated with the risk of developing postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery. This might have important clinical implications with respect to careful and precise hemodynamic monitoring and proactive treatment, especially in patients with increased risk for postoperative delirium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号