Health surveys

健康调查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Monitoring the pharmacotherapy adherence in society is crucial for identifying occurance and causes of potential inadequate use of drugs and inform providers about the need for better customer counceling. It is necessary component of the strategic planning of the quality of healthcare services. This population- based study aimed to assess the medication intake adherence in the Republic of Serbia and the individual factors and health system variables influencing its pattern.
    UNASSIGNED: We applied a cross-sectional approach to study medication intake adherence using a secondary analysis of the latest 2019 Serbian National Health Survey data. The statistical modeling of the pharmacotherapy adherence incorporated sociodemographic data, self-reported disease, and lifestyle behavior.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2019, in the representative sample of 12,066 adults in Serbia, requiring prescribed medicine, 49.8% did comply with the prescribed drugs, and 50.2% do not. Participants who adhered to prescribed medication were significantly (p < 0.001) older (62.4 ± 14 years), predominantly female (55.3%), had secondary education (48.5%), resided in southern and eastern parts of Serbia (55.5%), and belonged to the lowest income quintile (21.4%). The participants most often take prescribed drugs for hypertension (64.1%) and lower back pain (30.5%), while around 20% take medication for coronary disease, diabetes mellitus, and high blood cholesterol. About 85-92% of participants with financial or general difficulties using prescribed medication.
    UNASSIGNED: There is poor medication intake adherence to prescribed medication in Serbia. Gender, age, and region determine the adherence. Also, health-related and healthcare system-related factors impact the use of prescribed medication. Study findings can inform planning the counceling interventions in the target groups where improving medication adherence is necessary, as well as to enhance training of healthcare providers about pharmacotherapy adherence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: This study examines the factors affecting unmet healthcare experiences by integrating individual-and community-level extinction indices.
    UNASSIGNED: Using spatial autocorrelation and multilevel modeling, the study utilizes data from the Community Health Survey and Statistics Korea for 218 local government regions from 2018 to 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis identifies significant clustering, particularly in non-metropolitan regions with a higher local extinction index. At the individual level, some factors affect unmet medical needs, and unmet healthcare needs increase as the local extinction index at the community level increases.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings underscore the need for strategic efforts to enhance regional healthcare accessibility, particularly for vulnerable populations and local infrastructure development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在撒哈拉以南非洲,实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)和保护人口免受与健康相关的财务困难仍然是具有挑战性的目标。随后,社区健康保险(CBHI)在中低收入国家引起了人们的兴趣,比如埃塞俄比亚。然而,CBHI入学率的城乡差距尚未使用多变量分解分析进行适当的调查。因此,本研究旨在使用2019年埃塞俄比亚迷你人口健康调查(EMDHS2019)评估埃塞俄比亚CBHI入学的城乡差异.
    这项研究使用了最新的EMDHS2019数据集。使用STATA17.0版软件进行分析。卡方检验用于评估CBHI登记与解释变量之间的关联。使用基于Logit的多元分解分析评估了CBHI入学的城乡差距。使用具有95%置信区间的<0.05的p值确定统计学显著性。
    研究发现,城乡家庭的CBHI入学率存在显着差异(p<0.001)。大约36.98%的CBHI入学差异归因于城乡家庭之间家庭特征的组成(禀赋)差异,63.02%的差异是由于这些特征(系数)的影响。研究发现,户主的年龄和教育程度,家庭大小,五岁以下儿童的数量,行政区,由于城乡家庭组成差异,财富状况是造成差异的重要因素。由于家庭特征的影响,该地区是导致CBHI入学率城乡差距的重要因素。
    埃塞俄比亚的CBHI入学率存在显著的城乡差距。户主的年龄和教育程度等因素,家庭大小,五岁以下儿童的数量,家庭的区域,家庭的财富状况导致了捐赠的差距,由于家庭特征的影响,家庭的地区是造成差异的因素。因此,有关机构应设计策略,以提高城乡家庭的CBHI入学率。
    UNASSIGNED: In sub-Saharan Africa, achieving universal health coverage (UHC) and protecting populations from health-related financial hardship remain challenging goals. Subsequently, community-based health insurance (CBHI) has gained interest in low and middle-income countries, such as Ethiopia. However, the rural-urban disparity in CBHI enrollment has not been properly investigated using multivariate decomposition analysis. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the rural-urban disparity of CBHI enrollment in Ethiopia using the Ethiopian Mini Demographic Health Survey 2019 (EMDHS 2019).
    UNASSIGNED: This study used the latest EMDHS 2019 dataset. STATA version 17.0 software was used for analyses. The chi-square test was used to assess the association between CBHI enrollment and the explanatory variables. The rural-urban disparity of CBHI enrollment was assessed using the logit-based multivariate decomposition analysis. A p-value of <0.05 with a 95% confidence interval was used to determine the statistical significance.
    UNASSIGNED: The study found that there was a significant disparity in CBHI enrollment between urban and rural households (p < 0.001). Approximately 36.98% of CBHI enrollment disparities were attributed to the compositional (endowment) differences of household characteristics between urban and rural households, and 63.02% of the disparities were due to the effect of these characteristics (coefficients). The study identified that the age and education of the household head, family size, number of under-five children, administrative regions, and wealth status were significant contributing factors for the disparities due to compositional differences between urban and rural households. The region was the significant factor that contributed to the rural-urban disparity of CBHI enrollment due to the effect of household characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: There were significant urban-rural disparities in CBHI enrollment in Ethiopia. Factors such as age and education of the household head, family size, number of under-five children, region of the household, and wealth status of the household contributed to the disparities attributed to the endowment, and region of the household was the contributing factor for the disparities due to the effect of household characteristics. Therefore, the concerned body should design strategies to enhance equitable CBHI enrollment in urban and rural households.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人口调查对于公共政策规划至关重要,并提供有价值的代表性数据。在确定和评估动脉高血压(AH)患病率的卫生部门研究中,慢性非传染性疾病(NCD),与其相关的风险因素一起进行了研究。
    目的:本研究旨在评估人口健康调查在估算2021年8月至2023年6月索罗卡巴市动脉高血压(AH)患病率方面的有效性。
    方法:分析的性能指标是成人(≥18岁)AH患病率的精确度(设计效果-deff)及其对主要危险因素的暴露。总样本包括来自市区的1,080个人,被认为足以估计1.5的deff。这项基于集群的研究利用人口普查部门作为集群,通过家庭访谈收集的数据,标准化问卷,以及血压和生物参数的测量。使用的deff计算公式是加权方差/原始方差。研究伦理委员会批准了这项研究,注册CAAE30538520-1-0000-5373。
    结果:deff值范围从慢性阻塞性肺疾病的0.44到哮喘的1.63,AH患病率的deff为1.00。
    结论:该研究结果具有良好的精确性,参与者的高度接受和合作。研究的成本效益被认为是适当的。根据巴西地理研究所(IBGE)的详细制图和人口统计数据,在集群(人口普查部门)中选择家庭的技术被证明是实用和有效的,适合在其他城市复制和研究其他非传染性疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Population surveys are crucial for public policy planning and provide valuable representative data. In the health sector studies to identify and assess the prevalence of Arterial Hypertension (AH), a chronic non-communicable disease (NCD), along with its associated risk factors have been conducted.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a population health survey in estimating the prevalence of arterial hypertension (AH) in the Sorocaba municipality between August 2021 and June 2023.
    METHODS: The analyzed performance indicator is the precision (design effect - deff) of AH prevalence in adults (≥ 18 years) and their exposure to primary risk factors. The total sample included 1,080 individuals from the urban area, deemed sufficient to estimate a deff of 1.5. This cluster-based study utilized census sectors as clusters, with data collected through household interviews, standardized questionnaires, and measurements of blood pressure and biometric parameters. The deff calculation formula used was weighted variance / raw variance. The Research Ethics Committee approved this study, with registration CAAE 30538520-1-0000-5373.
    RESULTS: The deff values ranged from 0.44 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to 1.63 for asthma, with a deff of 1.00 for AH prevalence.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated good precision in its results, with high receptivity and cooperation from participants. The cost-effectiveness of the research deemed appropriate. The technique of selecting households within clusters (census sectors) based on detailed mapping and demographic data from the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) proved to be practical and efficient, suitable for replication in other municipalities and for studying other NCDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏代谢疾病是一个主要的全球健康问题。这项研究旨在确定有针对性的干预措施的领域,并调查社会经济地位和生活方式作为美国背景下的潜在调解人的影响。
    方法:我们的研究分析了健康信息国家趋势调查5的数据,这是美国国家癌症研究所的一项全国性调查。使用标准化的量表和问题,我们检查了心脏代谢疾病的结果,生活方式因素,以及美国18岁以上非制度化平民的社会经济地位。我们使用结构方程模型对数据进行了分析。
    结果:我们的研究结果表明,社会经济地位和生活方式显著预测心脏代谢疾病的结局。然而,我们的分析不支持生活方式作为社会经济地位和心脏代谢疾病之间关联的主要调节因素,这表明其他因素可能会显著影响这种关系。
    结论:心脏代谢疾病需要针对社会经济因素的生活方式和结构性干预措施。政策制定者必须考虑多方面因素,检测,并有效和公平地管理这些疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Cardiometabolic diseases are a major global health concern. This study aims to identify areas for targeted interventions and investigate the impact of socioeconomic status and lifestyle as a potential mediator in the context of the US.
    METHODS: Our study analyzed data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5, a nationwide survey by the National Cancer Institute. Using standardized scales and questions, we examined cardiometabolic disease outcomes, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic status of non-institutionalized civilians aged 18 + in the US. We analyzed the data using structural equation modelling.
    RESULTS: Our findings show that socioeconomic status and lifestyle significantly predict cardiometabolic disease outcomes. However, our analysis did not support lifestyle as the primary mediating factor in the association between socioeconomic status and cardiometabolic diseases, suggesting that other factors may significantly influence this relationship.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cardiometabolic diseases require lifestyle and structural interventions addressing socioeconomic factors. Policymakers must consider multifaceted factors to prevent, detect, and manage these diseases effectively and equitably.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对2022年菲律宾国家人口与健康调查(PNDHS)进行了二次数据分析,以使用多级验证性因子分析(CFA)探索有关传染病和非传染病的知识的潜在结构。PNDHS数据包括两个级别:1级代表家庭内数据(家庭问卷),级别2表示家庭间数据(初级抽样单位(PSU))。因此,进行了两水平CFA和两水平方差CFA.此外,一项多群体分析评估了男性/女性和城市/农村群体之间的结构差异.在国家国土安全部的调查中,完成了30372户家庭访谈。对癌症的知识水平,心脏病,糖尿病,登革热,TB,COVID-19占96.7%,94.9%,97.8%,98.4%,96.7%,92.8%,分别。两级CFA表明,两个级别的每个项目的系数载荷均具有统计学意义(Z检验,P<0.001)。关于两级方差CFA,1级的方差高于2级(分别为13和6.7).多组分析显示,该模型在性别和居住地之间是非不变的(不相等)(似然比检验;分别为P<0.001,P<0.001)。总之,一级比二级的影响更大,因为一级的差异大于二级的差异,与其他项目相比,新冠肺炎的知识负荷最低,农村/城市地区和女性/男性表现出不同的健康知识水平。
    A secondary data analysis of the 2022 Philippine National Demographic and Health Survey (PNDHS) was conducted to explore the underlying structure of knowledge regarding communicable and noncommunicable diseases using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The PNDHS data consist of two levels: level-1 represents within-household data (household questionnaire), and level-2 represents between-household data (primary sampling unit (PSU)). Therefore, a two-level CFA and two-level variance CFA were performed. Furthermore, a multigroup analysis assessed the structural differences between males/females and urban/rural groups. In the PNDHS survey, 30,372 household interviews were completed. Knowledge levels for cancer, heart disease, diabetes, dengue fever, TB, and COVID-19 were 96.7%, 94.9%, 97.8%, 98.4%, 96.7%, and 92.8%, respectively. The two-level CFA indicated that the coefficient loadings of each item for both levels were statistically significant (Z-test, P < 0.001). Regarding two-level variance CFA, the variance at level-1 was higher than that at level-2 (13 and 6.7, respectively). The multigroup analysis revealed that the model was non-invariant (not equal) across gender and residence (likelihood ratio test; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, level-1 has greater effect than does level-2 because the variance in level-1 is greater than that in level-2, the knowledge of COVID-19 has the lowest loading compared to other items, and rural/urban areas and females/males exhibit different levels of health knowledge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:营养不良对5岁以下儿童有重要的短期和长期影响。营养不良包括营养不良,营养过剩,两者共存,被称为营养不良的双重负担(DBM)。目的:本研究的目的是估计营养不良的患病率,营养过剩,在国家一级和巴拿马的居住区,这些儿童中的DBM。方法:数据来自巴拿马国家健康调查(ENSPA,西班牙语首字母缩写),以人口为基础,使用2019年进行的横断面研究。发育迟缓,浪费,超重,肥胖是根据世界卫生组织增长标准的分界点定义的。营养不良被定义为仅发育迟缓,仅浪费或两者兼有;营养过剩被定义为仅超重或仅肥胖;DBM被定义为同一孩子发育迟缓和超重/肥胖的共存。对国家一级和居住面积的患病率和一般特征进行了加权。研究结果:在全国范围内,营养不良的患病率为15.3%(95%置信区间(CI)13.4-17.3),在土著地区为36.6%(CI:30.1-43.5)。在全国范围内,营养过剩的患病率为10.2%(8.2-12.6),为11.9%(CI:8.5-16.3),8.4%(CI:6.5-10.7)和8.7%(CI:5.2-14.3)在城市,农村和土著地区,分别。全国DBM患病率为1.4%(CI:1.0-2.1),土著地区为2.7%(CI:1.4-5.1)。结论:营养不足仍然是我国最普遍的营养不良状况。巴拿马是中美洲营养过剩患病率最高的国家。在土著地区的儿童中,营养不良和DBM的患病率最高。
    Background: Malnutrition has important short- and long-term consequences in children under age five. Malnutrition encompasses undernutrition, overnutrition, and the coexistence of both of them, known as the double burden of malnutrition (DBM). Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of undernutrition, overnutrition, and the DBM among these children at the national level and by living area in Panama. Methods: Data from the National Health Survey of Panama (ENSPA, Spanish acronym), a population-based, cross-sectional study carried out in 2019 were used. Stunting, wasting, overweight, and obesity were defined according to the cut-off points of the World Health Organization Growth Standards. Undernutrition was defined as being stunted only, wasted only or both; overnutrition was defined as being overweight only or obese only; and the DBM was defined as the co-occurence of stunting and overweight/obesity in the same child. Prevalence and general characteristics at the national level and by living area were weighted. Findings: The prevalence of undernutrition was 15.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13.4-17.3) at the national level and 36.6% (CI: 30.1-43.5) in indigenous areas. The prevalence of overnutrition was 10.2% (8.2-12.6) at the national level and 11.9% (CI: 8.5-16.3), 8.4% (CI: 6.5-10.7) and 8.7% (CI: 5.2-14.3) in urban, rural and indigenous areas, respectively. The DBM prevalence was 1.4% (CI: 1.0-2.1) at the national level and 2.7% (CI: 1.4-5.1) in indigenous areas. Conclusions: Undernutrition is still the most prevalent malnutrition condition in our country. Panama has the highest prevalence of overnutrition in Central America. The highest prevalence of undernutrition and DBM was found among children living in indigenous areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:婴儿生存是任何社区健康的重要因素。低出生体重不仅会影响婴儿的婴儿期,还会对他们成年后的健康产生长期影响。不幸的是,撒哈拉以南非洲作为一个区域仍在处理低出生体重(LBW)的负担,坦桑尼亚作为该地区的一部分也不例外。因此,本研究旨在确定生育活婴的育龄妇女的低出生体重及其相关母体因素。
    方法:该研究使用分析性横断面研究设计来分析来自2015-2016年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查和疟疾指标调查的次要数据。该研究包括在调查前五年内生下活婴的4,644名育龄妇女。使用双变量和多变量物流回归分析来评估与低出生体重相关的母体因素。
    结果:LBW的患病率为262(6.2%)。在调整了混杂因素后,与LBW相关的母亲因素是孕妇的年龄组[小于20岁(aOR=1.907CI=1.134-3.205),ANC访问次数[访问不足(aOR=1.612CI=1.266-2.05)],奇偶校验[第2-4段(AOR=0.609CI=0.453-0.818),第5段+(aOR=0.612CI=0.397-0.944)]和居住地[Unguja(aOR=1.981CI=1.367-2.87)。
    结论:坦桑尼亚低出生体重的患病率仍然很高。女人的年龄,奇偶校验,产前护理就诊次数(ANC),和居住地被发现是与LBW相关的母体因素。因此,对高危孕妇低出生体重的危险因素进行早期产前诊断可能有助于减轻坦桑尼亚的LBW负担及其不利影响.
    BACKGROUND: Infant survival is an important factor in any community\'s health. Low birth weight affects babies not only during their infancy but also has long-term consequences for their health as adults. Unfortunately, Sub-Saharan Africa as a region is still dealing with the burden of Low birth weight (LBW), and Tanzania as a part of this region is no exception. So this study aimed to determine the Magnitude of Low Birth Weight and Its Associated Maternal Factors among Women of Reproductive Age who gave birth to live babies.
    METHODS: The study used analytical cross-sectional study design to analyze secondary data from the Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicators Survey 2015-2016. A total of 4,644 women of reproductive age who gave birth to live babies within five years preceding the survey were included in the study. Both bivariate and multivariable logistics regression analyses were used to assess maternal factors associated with low birth weight.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of LBW was 262(6.2%). After adjusting for confounders, the maternal factors associated with LBW were Age group of a pregnant woman [Less than 20 years (aOR = 1.907 CI = 1.134-3.205) in reference to those aged more than 34years], Number of ANC visits made [Inadequate visits (aOR = 1.612 CI = 1.266-2.05)], parity [para 2-4 (aOR = 0.609 CI = 0.453-0.818), para 5+ (aOR = 0.612 CI = 0.397-0.944)] and area of residence [Unguja (aOR = 1.981 CI = 1.367-2.87).
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of low birth weight in Tanzania remains high. Women\'s age, parity, number of Antenatal care visits (ANC), and area of residence were found to be maternal factors associated with LBW. Thus, early prenatal diagnosis of risk factors for low birth weight in high-risk pregnant women may help to reduce the LBW burden in Tanzania and its detrimental effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对妇女的暴力行为是一个广泛的公共卫生问题,对妇女的性健康和生殖健康造成严重影响,包括更高的流产或死产风险,意外怀孕和人工流产。这项研究调查了女性遭受身体暴力之间的关系,心理暴力和性健康和生殖健康结果(避孕药具的使用,流产或死产和流产)在德国。
    方法:本研究采用横断面研究设计,分析通过德国成人健康访谈和检查调查收集的关于暴力侵害妇女行为以及性健康和生殖健康(SRH)结果的数据,第一波,2008年至2011年(n=3149名女性,18-64岁)。使用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估女性暴力经历与性健康和生殖健康结果之间的关联。考虑到社会人口统计学和健康相关因素的影响(年龄,婚姻状况,社会经济地位,社会支持,儿童数量,酒精消费,健康状况,慢性疾病)。
    结果:在完全调整的模型中,三个关联仍然显着(p<0.05):(i)父母或照顾者对身体暴力的暴露以及避孕药的使用(aOR,调整后的赔率比,95%CI:1.36,1.02-1.81)(ii)自16岁起遭受身体暴力和流产或死产(aOR,95CI:1.89,1.17-3.04);以及(iii)父母或照顾者和堕胎的心理暴力(aOR,95CI:1.87,1.30-2.70)。
    结论:结果表明,自16岁起遭受身体或心理暴力的德国成年妇女,包括父母或照顾者的暴力行为,更有可能报告流产或死产和流产。对妇女的暴力经历的直接评估应由医疗保健专业人员在临床中进行,特别是妇产科专家,预防妇女不良的性健康和生殖健康结果。此外,暴力应被视为主要的公共卫生问题,并通过多部门方法加以解决,涉及医疗保健和教育部门,研究人员和相关政策制定者。
    OBJECTIVE: Violence against women is a widespread public health concern with severe effects to women\'s sexual and reproductive health, including higher risks for miscarriage or stillbirth, unintended pregnancy and induced abortion. This study examined the association between women exposure to physical violence, psychological violence and sexual and reproductive health outcomes (contraceptive use, miscarriage or stillbirth and abortion) in Germany.
    METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional research design to analyze data on violence against women and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes collected through the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults, Wave 1, between 2008 and 2011 (n = 3149 women, aged 18-64 years). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between experiences of violence among women and the presence of sexual and reproductive health outcomes, considering the influence of socio-demographic and health-related factors (age, marital status, socioeconomic status, social support, number of children, alcohol consumption, health status, chronic conditions).
    RESULTS: Three associations remained significant (p<0.05) in fully-adjusted models: (i) exposure to physical violence by a parent or caregiver and birth control pill utilization (aOR, adjusted Odds Ratio, 95% CI: 1.36, 1.02-1.81) (ii) exposure to physical violence since the age of 16 and miscarriage or stillbirth (aOR, 95%CI: 1.89, 1.17-3.04); and (iii) exposure to psychological violence by a parent or caregiver and abortion (aOR, 95%CI: 1.87, 1.30-2.70).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that adult German women who experienced physical or psychological violence since the age of 16, including violence perpetrated by a parent or caregiver, were more likely to report miscarriage or stillbirth and abortion. Direct assessment of violence experiences against women should be conducted by healthcare professionals in clinical encounters, particularly by obstetrics and gynaecological specialists, for the prevention of women´s adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Furthermore, violence should be treated as a major public health concern and addressed through a multisectoral approach, involving the healthcare and educational sectors, researchers and relevant policymakers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吸烟仍然是可预防疾病和死亡的最大原因,也是健康不平等的主要原因。牙科专业人员可以很好地提供与药物治疗相结合的行为支持,以提高整个人群的戒烟率。我们旨在评估2009年至2019年苏格兰成年吸烟者牙科就诊的趋势和社会经济不平等,并研究戒烟干预措施的牙科设置的潜在人群。
    方法:对2009/11、2013/15和2017/19年的合并苏格兰健康调查(SHeS)进行了二次分析。\“最近\”牙科出勤(在过去两年内)是重点,描述性分析检查了自我报告的吸烟者与非吸烟者相比的出勤情况,并通过基于地区的苏格兰多重剥夺指数(SIMD)和个人社会经济措施(收入,教育,和职业)。使用广义线性模型对非吸烟者的近期出勤率进行建模,相对于由社会经济指标调整的吸烟者,分别为每个调查队列。以95%置信区间(CI)计算绝对差异和风险比。
    结果:从2009/11年到2017/19年,吸烟者(70-76%)和非吸烟者(84-87%)的近期牙科出勤率普遍较高,并且在所有SIMD组中都有所增加。在调整社会人口统计学变量后,非吸烟者和吸烟者最近就诊的调整后风险差异(aRD)为8.9%(95%CI4.6%,13.2%)到2017/19。在吸烟者中,在三项调查中,生活在最贫困地区的人最近的出勤率比生活在最贫困地区的人低7-9%。
    结论:2009年至2019年的SHES数据表明,吸烟者在人群中参加牙医的比例很高,而且越来越高。尽管频率略低于不吸烟者。吸烟者的牙科护理存在很大的不平等,在不吸烟者的较小程度上,这些随着时间的推移而持续。牙科环境提供了一个很好的潜在机会,以提供人口水平的戒烟干预措施,但是在最贫困的人群和年龄较大的人群中,吸烟者可能更难接触到。应考虑确保为这些群体提供适当的比例支持,以采取预防性干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Smoking continues to be the single largest cause of preventable disease and death and a major contributor to health inequalities. Dental professionals are well placed to offer behavioural support in combination with pharmacotherapy to increase smoking cessation rates across the population. We aimed to assess the trends and socioeconomic inequalities in the dental attendance of adult smokers in Scotland from 2009 to 2019 and examine the potential population reach of dental settings for smoking cessation interventions.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted of combined Scottish Health Surveys (SHeS) from 2009/11, 2013/15 and 2017/19. \'Recent\' dental attendance (within the past two years) was the focus and descriptive analysis examined attendance of self-reported smokers compared to non-smokers and stratified by the area-based Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) and individual socioeconomic measures (income, education, and occupation). Generalised linear models were used to model recent attendance in non-smokers relative to smokers adjusted by the socioeconomic measures, for each of the survey cohorts separately. Absolute differences and risk ratios were calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI).
    RESULTS: Recent dental attendance was generally high and increased in both smokers (70-76%) and non-smokers (84-87%) from 2009/11 to 2017/19 and increased across all SIMD groups. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables, the adjusted Risk Difference (aRD) for recent attendance between non-smokers and smokers was 8.9% (95% CI 4.6%, 13.2%) by 2017/19. Within smokers, recent attendance was 7-9% lower in those living in the most deprived areas compared to those living in the least deprived areas over the three surveys.
    CONCLUSIONS: SHeS data from 2009 to 2019 demonstrated that a high and increasing proportion of smokers in the population attend the dentist, albeit slightly less frequently than non-smokers. There were large inequalities in the dental attendance of smokers, to a lesser extent in non-smokers, and these persisted over time. Dental settings provide a good potential opportunity to deliver population-level smoking cessation interventions, but smokers in the most deprived groups and older age groups may be harder to reach. Consideration should be given to ensure that these groups are given appropriate proportionate support to take up preventive interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号