Emergency service

紧急服务
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床实践中的人文关怀对于优质护理和患者满意度很重要。本研究旨在评估中国急诊患者对人文关怀的满意度及其相关因素。
    从2023年10月到2023年12月,在中国28个省和87家医院进行了多中心横断面调查,对急诊科住院患者采用抽样方法。患者对人文关怀的满意度通过自行编制的问卷进行评估,问卷包含6个维度的32个项目。采用逐步多元线性回归分析相关因素。
    共成功收集到3,003份有效问卷,有效率为86.05%。急诊患者人文关怀满意度总平均得分为4.67±0.66。年龄,医疗保险类型,参观了专门的急诊科,等待时间,是否有陪伴的人,医院级别,医院类型是人文关怀满意度的相关因素(P<0.05)。相关分析表明,感知价值,其三个维度与人文关怀满意度呈中等相关。多元线性回归显示等待时间(β=-0.219,P<0.05),是否有陪同人员(β=-0.192,P<0.05),医院水平(β=-0.137,P<0.05),功能值(β=0.197,P<0.05),情绪值(β=0.418,P<0.05)是较强的预测因子。
    各级医院应提高患者的感知价值,缩短等待时间,并在急诊科为护理人员提供更好的人文关怀。
    UNASSIGNED: Humanistic caring in clinical practice is important for quality care and patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction with humanistic care for emergency patients in China and its associated factors.
    UNASSIGNED: From October 2023 to December 2023, a multi-center cross-sectional survey was conducted across 28 provinces and 87 hospitals in China, using a sampling method for inpatients in emergency department. Patient satisfaction with humanistic care was evaluated by a self-developed questionnaire with 32 items across 6 dimensions. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to explore associated factors.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 3,003 valid questionnaires were successfully collected, with an effective rate of 86.05%. The emergency patients\' total mean humanistic caring satisfaction score was 4.67 ± 0.66. Age, medical insurance type, specialized emergency department visited, waiting times, whether had accompanied person, hospital level, and hospital type are correlated factors (P < 0.05) regarding humanistic caring satisfaction. The correlation analysis showed perceived value, and its three dimensions were moderately correlated with humanistic caring satisfaction. The multiple linear regression showed waiting time (β = -0.219, P < 0.05), whether had accompanied person (β = -0.192, P < 0.05), hospital level (β = -0.137, P < 0.05), functional value (β = 0.197, P < 0.05), and emotional value (β = 0.418, P < 0.05) were strong predictors.
    UNASSIGNED: Hospitals at all levels should improve patients\' perceived value, shorten waiting times, and provide caregivers with improved humanistic care in the emergency department.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在急诊室(ER)中经常进行外周血管内导管(PIVC)插入,并且发生了许多初始PIVC插入失败。为了减少故障,开发了新的针头。这项研究旨在调查与使用现有针头相比,使用新开发的针头是否减少了最初PIVC插入ER的失败。
    这种单中心,前瞻性观察性研究于2022年4月1日至2023年2月2日在日本进行.我们纳入了连续的患者,这些患者在工作日的白天(从上午8:00到下午5:00)乘救护车作为二级紧急情况来我们医院就诊。PIVC插入的从业者和评估者是独立的。主要和次要结局是最初的PIVC插入失败和手术数量,分别。我们定义了滴定的难度,泄漏,插入后30s内血肿为失败。为了评估结果与使用新开发的针头之间的关联,我们通过调整协变量进行了多变量逻辑回归和多元回归分析.
    总共,分析了522例没有缺失数据的患者,81例(15.5%)患者显示初始PIVC插入失败。程序的中位数(四分位距)为1(1-1)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示新开发的PIVC的使用与初始PIVC插入失败之间没有显着关联(优势比,0.79;95%置信区间,[0.48-1.31];p=0.36)。此外,多元回归分析显示,新开发的PIVC的使用与程序数量之间没有显着关联(回归系数,-0.0042;95%置信区间,[-0.065-0.056];p=0.89)。
    我们的研究未显示两种类型的针头在初始PIVC插入失败和程序数量方面的差异。
    UNASSIGNED: Peripheral intravascular catheter (PIVC) insertion is frequently performed in the emergency room (ER) and many failures of initial PIVC insertion occur. To reduce the failures, new needles were developed. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of the newly developed needle reduced the failure of initial PIVC insertion in the ER compared with the use of the existing needle.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-centre, prospective observational study was conducted in Japan between April 1, 2022, and February 2, 2023. We included consecutive patients who visited our hospital by ambulance as a secondary emergency on a weekday during the day shift (from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM). The practitioners for PIVC insertion and assessors were independent. The primary and secondary outcomes were the failure of initial PIVC insertion and number of procedures, respectively. We defined the difficulty of titrating, leakage, and hematoma within 30 s after insertion as failures. To evaluate the association between the outcomes and the use of newly developed needles, we performed multivariate logistic regression and multiple regression analyses by adjusting for covariates.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 522 patients without missing data were analysed, and 81 (15.5%) patients showed failure of initial PIVC insertion. The median number of procedures (interquartile range) was 1 (1-1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no significant association between the use of newly developed PIVCs and the failure of initial PIVC insertion (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, [0.48-1.31]; p = 0.36). Moreover, multiple regression analysis revealed no significant association between the use of newly developed PIVCs and the number of procedures (regression coefficient, -0.0042; 95% confidence interval, [-0.065-0.056]; p = 0.89).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study did not show a difference between the two types of needles with respect to the failure of initial PIVC insertion and the number of procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,急诊科(ED)在治疗有COVID-19相关症状的患者方面面临挑战.因此,本研究的目的是调查ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在因隔离或预防措施导致的COVID-19大流行期间的治疗延迟和预后结局,并与COVID-19前期进行比较.
    方法:这是一项回顾性观察研究,使用不同病例组合的多中心数据。通过各中心普通病例报告表的电子医疗数据收集匿名数据。主要结果是28天内住院死亡率的数量和比率。次要结果是门到气球的时间和在ED中的停留时间。进行Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险回归分析以确定预测因子对28天住院死亡率的影响。
    结果:在COVID-19期间,有COVID-19相关症状的STEMI患者的门至球囊时间比没有症状的患者长(97.0[74.8,139.8]与69.0[55.0,102.0]分钟,P<.001)。然而,在COVID-19前期,有和没有COVID-19相关症状的STEMI患者的门到球囊时间没有显着统计学差异(73.0[61.0,92.0]vs.67.0[54.5,80.0]分钟,P=.2869)。根据COVID-19前期提示COVID-19的症状,28天死亡率没有显示出统计学上的显著差异(15.4%vs.6.8%,P=.1257)。然而,在COVID-19期间,这一比例明显更高(21.1%与6.7%,P=.0102),有COVID-19提示症状的患者比没有症状的患者。
    结论:在韩国,大流行期间提示COVID-19的症状对STEMI患者的门至球囊时间增加和28日死亡率有显著影响.因此,卫生当局需要根据各种医学领域专家的意见,在指定ED中指示隔离的症状时做出谨慎的决定。
    BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, the emergency department (ED) was challenged to treat patients with COVID-19-related symptom. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate treatment delay and prognostic outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients during COVID-19 pandemic due to isolation or precaution and compare it with pre-COVID-19 period.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective observation study using multicenter data with different case mix. Anonymized data were collected through each center\'s electronic medical data of common case report form. Primary outcomes were number and rate of in-hospital mortality within 28 days. Secondary outcomes were door-to-balloon time and length of stay in the ED. Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to determine impact of predictors on 28-day in-hospital mortality.
    RESULTS: Door-to-balloon time was longer in STEMI patients with COVID-19-related symptom(s) than those without symptom during the COVID-19 period (97.0 [74.8, 139.8] vs. 69.0 [55.0, 102.0] minutes, P<.001). However, there was no significant statistical difference in door-to-balloon time between STEMI patients with and without COVID-19-related symptom(s) during the pre-COVID-19 period (73.0 [61.0, 92.0] vs. 67.0 [54.5, 80.0] minutes, P=.2869). The 28-day mortality rate did not show a statistically significant difference depending on symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 during the pre-COVID-19 period (15.4% vs. 6.8%, P=.1257). However, it was significantly higher during the COVID-19 period (21.1% vs. 6.7%, P=.0102) in patients with COVID-19 suggestive symptoms than in patients without the symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 during the pandemic had a significant effect on the increase of door-to-balloon time and 28-day mortality in STEMI patients. Thus, health authorities need to make careful decision in designating symptoms indicated for isolation in ED based on opinions of various medical field experts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于暴力和冲突导致重伤和死亡,大量转诊至急诊科。此类案件越来越多,突出表明迫切需要调查身体暴力的受害情况。
    目的:这项研究的目的是确定暴力受害者的人口统计学和临床特征的频率,并根据穿透性或钝性创伤对其进行分类。
    方法:2020年遭受暴力侵害的患者数据来自桂兰路创伤研究中心(GTRC)的创伤登记系统(TRS)。所有分析均使用SPSS软件版本24进行。显著性水平被认为小于0.05。
    结果:不同年龄组与暴力有关的创伤类型有显著差异(P<0.001),基于性别(P=0.002),婚姻状况(P=0.012)。创伤类型和包括吸烟在内的临床变量之间也存在显着差异(P=0.032),饮酒史(P=0.005),和其他物质的使用(P=0.002),损伤的解剖位置(P<0.001)和治疗干预(p<0.001(。
    结论:暴力的大多数客户都遭受了钝性创伤,其严重程度是轻微的,他们在不需要手术的情况下得到了支持治疗。钝性创伤更多见于女性,离婚者,40岁以上,不吸烟。在下肢受伤,酒精和苯丙胺使用者中观察到更多的穿透性创伤。在男性酗酒和苯丙胺滥用者达到生命的第四个十年之前,应该为社会制定预防计划和教育干预措施。准确记录身体暴力的类型,和使用的武器,确定TRS中的伤害严重程度评分可以在研究暴力问题领域中获得更可靠的结果。
    BACKGROUND: A significant number of referrals to the emergency departments is due to violence and conflict leading to serious injuries and death. The increasing number of such cases highlights the urgent need for investigating victimization of physical violence.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of demographic and clinical characteristics in victims of violence and classify them based on penetrating or blunt trauma.
    METHODS: The data of the patients who had been the victims of violence in 2020 were extracted from the Trauma Registry System(TRS) of the Guilan Road Trauma Research Center(GTRC). All analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24. The significance level was considered less than 0.05.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the type of violence-related trauma in different age groups (P < 0.001), based on sex (P = 0.002), and marital status (P = 0.012). A significant difference also existed between the trauma type and clinical variables including smoking (P = 0.032), history of alcohol drinking (P = 0.005), and other substance use (P = 0.002), the anatomical location of injury (P < 0.001) and therapeutic interventions (p < 0.001(.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most of the clients of the violence suffered from blunt trauma, the severity of which was mild, and they were treated supportively without the need for surgery. Blunt trauma was seen more in women, divorcees, over 40 years and non-smokers. Penetrating trauma was observed more in lower limb injuries and alcohol and amphetamine users. Prevention programs and educational interventions should be programmed for the society long before men alcohol and amphetamine abusers reach their fourth decade of life. Accurately recording the type of physical violence, and the weapon used, and determining the injury severity score in TRS can lead to more reliable results in researching the field of violence issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脆弱是人口老龄化最复杂的后果的缩影。本研究旨在评估脆弱的影响,使用临床虚弱量表(CFS)测量,急诊科(ED)老年人的结局。
    我们在2021年3月8日至2021年11月30日期间,在台湾医疗中心进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,招募65岁及以上的患者。主要结果是90天死亡率。根据CFS评分将个体分为三组。在协变量调整后,采用Logistic回归检验虚弱对临床结果的影响。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Log秩检验进行生存分析。
    本研究共纳入473人,平均年龄82.1岁,其中60.5%是男性。90天死亡率为10.6%。在这些群体中,CFS评分7-9组的90天死亡率最高(15.9%),其次是CFS评分4-6组(8.0%)和CFS评分1-3组(7.1%).多因素logistic回归分析显示CFS评分对预后有显著影响,90天死亡率的校正奇数比率为1.24(95%CI1.06-1.47),住院1.18(95%CI1.06-1.31),180天死亡率为1.30(95%CI1.12-1.52)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,CFS评分高的患者90天死亡率明显较高(Logranktests,p=0.019)。
    在老年ED人群中,CFS评估的虚弱严重程度是住院的一个重要和重要的预后因素。90天死亡率,和180天死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: Frailty epitomizes the most complex consequence of an aging population. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty, measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), on outcomes of older people in an emergency department (ED).
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a prospective observational study enrolling patients aged 65 years and older in a medical center of Taiwan between March 8, 2021, and November 30, 2021. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality rate. Individuals were categorized into three groups based on the CFS scores. Logistic regression was employed to examine the influence of frailty on clinical outcomes following covariate adjustment. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and Log rank tests.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 473 individuals were included in the study, with a mean age of 82.1 years, and 60.5% of them were males. The 90-day mortality rate was 10.6%. Among these groups, the CFS score 7-9 group had the highest 90-day mortality rate (15.9%), followed by the CFS score 4-6 group (8.0%) and the CFS score 1-3 group (7.1%). The multiple logistic regression analyses demonstrated a significant impact of CFS score on prognosis, with adjusted odd ratios of 1.24 (95% CI 1.06-1.47) for 90-day mortality, 1.18 (95% CI 1.06-1.31) for hospitalization, and 1.30 (95% CI 1.12-1.52) for 180-day mortality. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate for patients with high CFS scores (Log rank tests, p = 0.019).
    UNASSIGNED: In the older ED population, the severity of frailty assessed by the CFS emerged as a significant and important prognostic factor for hospitalization, 90-day mortality, and 180-day mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    工作场所暴力是地方性的,破坏性,以及医疗保健中频率和严重程度的升级。关于地区和偏远医院急诊科(ED)的工作场所暴力的研究很少。
    这项研究的目的是在澳大利亚五个地区和偏远地点确定与ED中暴力事件相关的犯罪者和情况特征。
    本研究审计了医院汇总数据,事件报告,和2018年12个月的医疗记录,以检查五个地区和偏远澳大利亚ED的工作场所暴力事件的肇事者和情况特征。
    暴力事件在整个星期和轮班中均匀分布。大多数事件被分类为紧急,发生在最初的4小时内,并有多学科参与。几乎每六个事件中就有一个导致受伤。施暴者主要是年轻和中年男性,几乎总是病人,大多数人表现为精神和行为障碍,或使用精神活性物质。
    了解暴力肇事者的特征可以帮助寻求量身定制干预措施,以减少进一步的暴力行为。这些发现对优化患者护理具有重要意义,员工安全和资源管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Workplace violence is endemic, destructive, and escalating in frequency and severity in healthcare. There is a paucity of research on workplace violence in regional and remote hospital emergency departments (EDs).
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to identify the perpetrator and situational characteristics associated with violent incidents in the ED across five regional and remote Australian sites.
    UNASSIGNED: This study audited hospital summary data, incident reports, and medical records for a 12-month period in 2018 to examine the perpetrator and situational characteristics of workplace violence incidents in five regional and remote Australian EDs.
    UNASSIGNED: Violent incidents were evenly spread throughout the week and across shifts. Most incidents were triaged as urgent, occurred within the first 4 hr, and had multidisciplinary involvement. Almost one in every six incidents resulted in an injury. Perpetrators of violence were predominantly young and middle-aged males and almost always patients, with most presenting with mental and behavioral disorders, or psychoactive substance use.
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding the characteristics of perpetrators of violence can help in seeking to tailor interventions to reduce further violent behaviors. These findings carry implications for optimizing patient care, staff safety and resource management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述本文从急诊医学的角度来看幸福和领导力的作用。急诊科(ED)领导的重要性,急诊医学写作,预防职业倦怠和同情疲劳怎么强调都不为过。本文着眼于在ED内部进行更多研究和衡量干预的必要性。它还强调了可以采取的一些措施,以帮助从领导的角度改善福祉,以改善患者的安全和结果。
    Description This article looks at well-being and the role of leadership from the perspective of emergency medicine. The importance of leadership within the emergency department (ED), emergency medicine writing at large, and the prevention of burnout and compassion fatigue cannot be overstated. This article looks at the need for more research and measured interventions within the ED. It also highlights some measures that could be taken to help improve well-being from a leadership perspective to improve patient safety and outcomes within the ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在急诊医学(EM)中,辨别患者期望以告知以患者为中心的护理带来了独特的挑战。我们设计了一种新的问卷,以促进临床医生对患者的期望的理解。
    我们进行了多站点,随机对照试验。通过临床医生和患者的反馈制定了一份征求患者期望的简短问卷。在他们的访问开始时,干预组患者填写问卷并提供给治疗临床医生.对照组患者接受标准护理。两组的参与者在评估五个满意度领域时都完成了一项调查。主要序数逻辑回归分析模拟了干预措施导致患者报告的临床医生对预期的理解改善的程度,并调整了人口统计学因素和部位。
    在308名参与者中,收集了141项干预措施和123项控制退出调查。在初步分析中,干预组有2.1倍的几率强烈同意他们的临床医生理解他们的期望(优势比:2.1,95%置信区间:1.2,3.7,p值:0.01),大致相当于治疗11所需的净数字,以提高满意度等级。尽管次要结局结果在组间没有显着差异,所有结果都倾向于干预组获得更有利的答案。
    虽然更多的患者报告说,当使用新工具时,他们的期望得到了解决,常规满意度测量结果无显著差异.未来的研究可能会检查引发患者期望的工具是否可以导致其他改善的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: In emergency medicine (EM), discerning patient expectations to inform patient-centered care poses unique challenges. We devised a novel questionnaire to facilitate clinicians\' understanding of patients\' expectations for their visit.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a multisite, randomized controlled trial. A brief questionnaire soliciting patient expectations was developed through feedback from clinicians and patients. At the beginning of their visit, the intervention group patients completed the questionnaire and provided it to their treating clinician. The control group patients received standard care. Participants in both groups completed a survey at time of disposition assessing five satisfaction domains. The primary ordinal logistic regression analysis modeled the extent to which the intervention led to patient-reported improvement in clinician understanding of expectations with adjustment for demographic factors and site.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 308 participants, 141 intervention and 123 control exit surveys were collected. In the primary analysis, the intervention group had 2.1 times greater odds of strongly agreeing that their clinician understood their expectations (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.7, p-value: 0.01), roughly equivalent to a net number needed to treat of 11 for one more improved satisfaction rating. Although the secondary outcome results were not significantly different between groups, all results tended toward the intervention group having more favorable answers.
    UNASSIGNED: While more patients reported that their expectations were addressed when the novel tool was used, no significant difference was found for conventional satisfaction measures. Future studies may examine whether a tool to elicit patient expectations can lead to other improved outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对紧急精神病护理的需求正在增加,但在西班牙,对于急诊部门(ED)如何优化精神病患者的护理并没有明确的建议.我们旨在就综合医院急诊科治疗有紧急精神症状的患者的要求提供专家共识建议。
    方法:我们使用了一种改进的Delphi技术。一个科学委员会根据文献检索和临床经验编制了36份声明。这些声明涵盖了组织模式,设施,人员配备,安全,患者干预,和员工培训。由38名具有精神病紧急情况专业知识的精神病学专家组成的小组分两轮对问卷进行了评估。
    结果:经过两轮投票,36个拟议项目中有30个(83%)得到了同意。小组同意精神病紧急情况应在综合医院进行管理,有专门的病人评估设施,直接监督有风险的患者,还有一个由精神病院管理的观察组.除了精神科医生,ED应有24/7全天候的专科护士和安全人员。社会工作者也应该随时可用。ED和咨询室的设计应确保患者和工作人员的安全。应该为有精神病症状的病人建立分诊制度,在精神病学评估之前进行医学评估。关于供应的指导,设备,还提供员工培训。
    结论:综合医院的所有ED都应该有足够的资源来处理任何精神病紧急情况。本文就实现这一目标的最低要求提供了建议。
    BACKGROUND: The demand for urgent psychiatric care is increasing, but in Spain there are no clear recommendations for emergency departments (ED) on how to optimize care for patients with psychiatric emergencies. We aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on the requirements for general hospitals´ emergency departments to treat patients with urgent psychiatric symptoms.
    METHODS: We used a modified Delphi technique. A scientific committee compiled 36 statements based on literature search and clinical experience. The statements covered the organizational model, facilities, staffing, safety, patient interventions, and staff training. A panel of 38 psychiatry specialists with expertise in psychiatric emergencies evaluated the questionnaire in two rounds.
    RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, 30 out of 36 proposed items (83%) were agreed upon. The panel agreed that psychiatric emergencies should be managed in a general hospital, with dedicated facilities for patient assessment, direct supervision of patients at risk, and an observation unit run by the psychiatric service. In addition to the psychiatrist, the ED should have specialist nurses and security staff available 24/7. Social workers should also be readily available. ED and consulting rooms should be designed to ensure patient and staff safety. A triage system should be established for patients with psychiatric symptoms, with medical evaluation preceding psychiatric evaluation. Guidance on supplies, equipment, and staff training is also provided.
    CONCLUSIONS: All ED in general hospitals should have adequate resources to handle any psychiatric emergency. This paper provides recommendations on the minimum requirements to achieve this goal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从急诊科(ED)早期出院或在ED中进行6小时观察是两种方法,用于处理具有正常脑计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者。本研究旨在比较两种管理方案的结果。
    这项研究是一个单中心,开放标签,2022年6月至2023年9月在Ramathibodi医院ED进行的试点随机病例对照研究。符合条件的参与者包括所有患有mTBI的人,他们在脑CT扫描中发现阴性。他们被随机分配到早期ED出院或6小时ED观察组,并比较结果(48小时ED再就诊率;脑震荡后综合征(PCS)1天的发生率,1个月,和初次受伤后3个月;和3个月死亡率)。
    122例患者,平均年龄为74.62±14.96(范围:25-99)岁(57.37%为女性)。在TBI的严重程度方面,早期出院组和观察组之间没有观察到显着差异(p=0.853),年龄(p=0.334),性别(p=0.588),分类水平(p=0.456),格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(p=0.806),合并症(p=0.768),药物使用情况(p=0.548),损伤机制(p=0.920),脑CT扫描的指征(p=0.593),从TBI发作到ED到达的时间(p=0.886),从ED分诊到脑部CT扫描的时间(p=0.333)。随机化后48小时内,两组之间的复诊发生率相似(1.57%vs.3.23%;p=1.000)。第1天早期出院与观察组的PCS发生率差异无统计学意义(33.90%vs.35.48%,p=0.503),在1个月时(12.07%与13.11%,p=0.542),在3个月时(1.92%vs.5.56%,随机分组后p=0.323)。经过三个月的随访,早期出院组的四名患者,已经过期(没有死亡与TBI相关)。
    看来,在初始脑CT扫描正常且没有其他损伤或神经系统异常的mTBI患者中,在不需要观察的情况下从急诊早期出院被认为是安全的.
    UNASSIGNED: Early discharge from the emergency department (ED) or a 6-hour observation in the ED are two methods for management of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) with normal brain computed tomography (CT) scan. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the two management options.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is a single-center, open-label, pilot randomized case control study conducted in the ED of Ramathibodi Hospital from June 2022 to September 2023. Eligible participants included all individuals with mTBI who had negative findings on Brain CT scans. They were randomly assigned to either the early ED discharge or 6-hour ED observation group and compared regarding the outcomes (rate of 48-hour ED revisits; occurrence of post-concussion syndrome (PCS) 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months after the initial injury; and 3-month mortality).
    UNASSIGNED: 122 patients with the mean age of 74.62 ± 14.96 (range: 25-99) years were consecutively enrolled (57.37% female). No significant differences were observed between the early discharge and observation groups regarding the severity of TBI (p=0.853), age (p=0.334), gender (p=0.588), triage level (p=0.456), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p=0.806), comorbidities (p=0.768), medication usage (p=0.548), mechanism of injury (p=0.920), indication for brain CT scan (p=0.593), time from TBI onset to ED arrival (p=0.886), and time from ED triage to brain CT scan (p=0.333). Within 48 hours after randomization, the incidence of revisits was similar between the two groups (1.57% vs. 3.23%; p = 1.000). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of PCS between the early discharge and observation groups at 1 day (33.90% vs. 35.48%, p = 0.503), at 1 month (12.07% vs. 13.11%, p = 0.542), and at 3 months (1.92% vs. 5.56%, p = 0.323) after randomization. After a three-month follow-up period, four patients in the early discharge group, had expired (none of the deaths were associated with TBI).
    UNASSIGNED: It seems that, in mTBI patients with normal initial brain CT scan and the absence of other injuries or neurological abnormalities, early discharge from the ED without requiring observation could be considered safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号