虽然电刺激已被证明可以提高危重病人的医学研究委员会(MRC)评分,它的有效性仍然是一个辩论的主题。这项荟萃分析旨在讨论电刺激在改善危重患者肌肉力量方面的有效性及其对不同临床结局的影响的最新见解。
■对主要电子数据库的全面搜索,包括PubMed,科克伦图书馆,和Embase,从开始到2024年6月15日进行,以确定评估电刺激对危重患者的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。分析的重点是将电刺激与标准护理进行比较,虚假干预,或安慰剂。感兴趣的结果包括MRC分数,机械通气(MV)的持续时间,死亡率,和重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间(LOS)。
■总共23个RCT,包括1798名患者,符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,与常规护理相比,电刺激在增强整体肌肉力量方面具有显着优势。根据MRC评分(MD=3.62,95%CI0.94至6.30,p=0.0008,I2=87%)。虽然电肌肉刺激(EMS)的亚组分析显示对ICULOS没有显着影响,敏感性分析显示,与对照组相比,EMS组(MD=-11.0,95%CI-21.12~-0.88,p=0.03)和电刺激组(MD=-1.02,95%CI-1.96~-0.08,p=0.03)的ICULOS有可能降低.此外,敏感性分析显示,电刺激(MD=-2.38,95%CI-3.81~-0.94,p=0.001)和神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)(MD=-2.36,95%CI-3.85~-0.88,p=0.002)均可降低住院住院住院住院住院住院总住院时间.在死亡率或MV持续时间方面没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。
■电刺激似乎是改善危重患者MRC评分的有效干预措施。然而,需要进一步的研究来解释电刺激对医院LOS和ICULOS的潜在影响.
■https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
UNASSIGNED: While electrical stimulation has been demonstrated to improve medical research council (MRC) scores in critically ill patients, its effectiveness remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to discuss recent insights into the effectiveness of electrical stimulation in improving muscle strength and its effects on different clinical outcomes in critically ill adults.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of major electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, was conducted from inception to June 15, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of electrical stimulation in critically ill patients. The analysis focused on comparing electrical stimulation to standard care, sham interventions, or placebo. Outcomes of interest included MRC scores, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), mortality rate, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 RCTs, including 1798 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The findings demonstrated a significant benefit of electrical stimulation over usual care in enhancing global muscle strength, as measured by MRC scores (MD =3.62, 95% CI 0.94 to 6.30, p = 0.0008, I2 = 87%). While subgroup analysis of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) demonstrated no significant effect on ICU LOS, sensitivity analysis indicated a potential reduction in ICU LOS for both EMS (MD = -11.0, 95% CI -21.12 to -0.88, p = 0.03) and electrical stimulation overall (MD = -1.02, 95% CI -1.96 to -0.08, p = 0.03) compared to the control group. In addition, sensitivity analysis suggested that both electrical stimulation (MD = -2.38, 95% CI -3.81 to -0.94, p = 0.001) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) specifically (MD = -2.36, 95% CI -3.85 to -0.88, p = 0.002) may contribute to a decrease in hospital LOS. No statistically significant differences were observed in mortality or duration of MV.
UNASSIGNED: Electrical stimulation appears to be an effective intervention for improving MRC scores in critically ill patients. However, further research is warranted to explain the potential effects of electrical stimulation on hospital LOS and ICU LOS.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.