BACKGROUND: Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.
METHODS: All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.
RESULTS: A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged donor hepatectomy time may be implicated in early and late complications of liver transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of donor hepatectomy time on outcomes of liver transplant recipients, mainly early allograft dysfunction.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included brain-dead donors and adult liver graft recipients. Donor-recipient matching was obtained through a crossover list. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded for both donors and recipients. Donor hepatectomy, cold ischemia, and warm ischemia times were recorded. Primary outcome was early allograft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included need for retransplantation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and patient and graft survival at 12 months.
RESULTS: From January 2019 to December 2021, a total of 243 patients underwent a liver transplant from a brain-dead donor. Of these, 57 (25%) developed early allograft dysfunction. The median donor hepatectomy time was 29 (23-40) min. Patients with early allograft dysfunction had a median hepatectomy time of 25 (22-38) min, whereas those without it had a median time of 30 (24-40) min (P = 0.126).
CONCLUSIONS: Donor hepatectomy time was not associated with early allograft dysfunction, graft survival, or patient survival following liver transplantation.

Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-Acquired Weakness (ICU-AW) is a generalized muscle weakness that is clinically detected in critical patients and has no plausible etiology other than critical illness. ICU-AW is uncommon in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our report sheds light on the highest number of ICU-AW cases observed in a single center on OLT patients with early allograft dysfunction. Out of 282 patients who underwent OLT from January 2015 to June 2023, 7 (2.5%) developed generalized muscle weakness in the ICU and underwent neurophysiological investigations. The neurologic examination showed preserved extraocular, flaccid quadriplegia with the absence of deep tendon reflexes in all patients. Neurophysiological studies, including electromyography and nerve conduction studies, showed abnormalities with fibrillation potentials and the rapid recruitment of small polyphasic motor units in the examined muscles, as well as a reduced amplitude of the compound muscle action potential and sensory nerve action potential, with an absence of demyelinating features. Pre-transplant clinical status was critical in all patients. During ICU stay, early allograft dysfunction, acute kidney injury, prolonged mechanical ventilation, sepsis, hyperglycemia, and high blood transfusions were observed in all patients. Two patients were retransplanted. Five patients were alive at 90 days; two patients died. In non-cooperative OLT patients, neurophysiological investigations are essential for the diagnosis of ICU-AW. In this setting, the high number of red blood cell transfusions is a potential risk factor for ICU-AW.

BACKGROUND: Donor-recipient size mismatch (DRSM) is considered a crucial factor for poor outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) because of complications, such as massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Liver volumetry is performed routinely in living donor LT, but rarely in deceased donor LT (DDLT), which amplifies the adverse effects of DRSM in DDLT. Due to the various shortcomings of traditional manual liver volumetry and formula methods, a feasible model based on intelligent/interactive qualitative and quantitative analysis-three-dimensional (IQQA-3D) for estimating the degree of DRSM is needed.
OBJECTIVE: To identify benefits of IQQA-3D liver volumetry in DDLT and establish an estimation model to guide perioperative management.
METHODS: We retrospectively determined the accuracy of IQQA-3D liver volumetry for standard total liver volume (TLV) (sTLV) and established an estimation TLV (eTLV) index (eTLVi) model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to detect the optimal cut-off values for predicting massive IBL and EAD in DDLT using donor sTLV to recipient sTLV (called sTLVi). The factors influencing the occurrence of massive IBL and EAD were explored through logistic regression analysis. Finally, the eTLVi model was compared with the sTLVi model through the ROC curve for verification.
RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included in the analysis. The Changzheng formula was accurate for calculating donor sTLV (P = 0.083) but not for recipient sTLV (P = 0.036). Recipient eTLV calculated using IQQA-3D highly matched with recipient sTLV (P = 0.221). Alcoholic liver disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sTLVi > 1.24 were independent risk factors for massive IBL, and drug-induced liver failure was an independent protective factor for massive IBL. Male donor-female recipient combination, model for end-stage liver disease score, sTLVi ≤ 0.85, and sTLVi ≥ 1.32 were independent risk factors for EAD, and viral hepatitis was an independent protective factor for EAD. The overall survival of patients in the 0.85 < sTLVi < 1.32 group was better compared to the sTLVi ≤ 0.85 group and sTLVi ≥ 1.32 group (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve of the sTLVi model and IQQA-3D eTLVi model in the detection of massive IBL and EAD (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: IQQA-3D eTLVi model has high accuracy in predicting massive IBL and EAD in DDLT. We should follow the guidance of the IQQA-3D eTLVi model in perioperative management.

The current clinical practice of assessing the quality and suitability of a donor liver for human transplantation does not exclude cases of primary graft dysfunction of the transplanted organ and, at the same time, leads to an unreasonable refusal to transplant a significant number of functionally suitable organs. In this regard, searching for new methods for additional objective assessment and monitoring of the state of donor organs in the peritransplant period is relevant. The aim of the study was to determine the clinical utility of monitoring interstitial concentrations of glucose and its metabolites to assess the viability and functional state of a donor liver before and after human transplantation.
A retrospective observational single-center study included 32 cases of liver transplantation. Along with standard methods for assessing the initial function of grafts during the first week after surgery, interstitial (in the transplanted liver) concentrations of glucose and its metabolites were monitored. In 18 cases, the interstitial glucose metabolism was also studied during static cold storage (SCS).
With the development of early allograft dysfunction (EAD), compared with the uneventful post-transplant period, statistically significantly higher interstitial lactate concentrations were observed as early as 3 h after reperfusion: 12.3 [10.1; 15.6] mmol/L versus 7.2 [3.9; 9.9] mmol/L (p=0.003). A value above 8.8 mmol/L may be considered as a criterion for the immediate diagnosis of EAD (sensitivity - 89%, specificity - 65%).Interstitial lactate concentration at the end of SCS and the area under the \"lactate concentration-SCS duration\" curve were associated with the initial graft function. Values of these parameters greater than 15.4 mmol/L and 76.1 mmol/L·h, respectively, with a sensitivity of 100% in both cases and a specificity of 77 and 85%, may be used to assess the risk of primary EAD.
Monitoring of interstitial concentrations of glucose and its metabolites, primarily, lactate, is an objective additional method for the assessment of the donor liver viability both during SCS and in the early postoperative period.

UNASSIGNED: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a common postliver transplant complication that has been associated with graft failure and risk for poor prognosis. There are many risk factors for the incidence of EAD after liver transplantation (LT). This study investigated whether elevated postoperative myoglobin (Mb) increases the incidence of EAD in liver transplanted recipients.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 150 adult recipients who measured Mb within 3 days after liver transplantation between June 2019 and June 2021 were evaluated. Then, all patients were divided into two groups: the EAD group and the non-EAD group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were constructed.
UNASSIGNED: The incidence of EAD was 53 out of 150 patients (35.3%) in our study. Based on the multivariate logistic analysis, the risk of EAD increased with elevated postoperative Mb (OR = 1.001, 95% CI 1.000-1.001, P = 0.002). The Mb AUC was 0.657, and it was 0.695 when combined with PCT. When the subgroup analysis was conducted, the AUC of serum Mb prediction was better in patients whose preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score  ≤ 15 or operative time ≥ 10 h (AUC = 0.751, 0.758, respectively, or 0.760, 0.800 when combined with PCT).
UNASSIGNED: Elevated Mb significantly increased the risk of postoperative EAD, suggesting that postoperative Mb may be a novel predictor of EAD after liver transplantation.The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2100044257, URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn).

Machine perfusion (MP) has been shown worldwide to offer many advantages in liver transplantation, but it still has some gray areas. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the donor risk factors of grafts, perfused with any MP, that might predict an ineffective MP setting and those would trigger post-transplant early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Data from donors of all MP-perfused grafts at six liver transplant centers have been analyzed, whether implanted or discarded after perfusion. The first endpoint was the negative events after perfusion (NegE), which is the number of grafts discarded plus those that were implanted but lost after the transplant. A risk factor analysis for NegE was performed and marginal grafts for MP were identified. Finally, the risk of EAD was analyzed, considering only implanted grafts. From 2015 to September 2019, 158 grafts were perfused with MP: 151 grafts were implanted and 7 were discarded after the MP phase because they did not reach viability criteria. Of 151, 15 grafts were lost after transplant, so the NegE group consisted of 22 donors. In univariate analysis, the donor risk index >1.7, the presence of hypertension in the medical history, static cold ischemia time, and the moderate or severe macrovesicular steatosis were the significant factors for NegE. Multivariate analysis confirmed that macrosteatosis >30% was an independent risk factor for NegE (odd ratio 5.643, p = 0.023, 95% confidence interval, 1.27-24.98). Of 151 transplanted patients, 34% experienced EAD and had worse 1- and 3-year-survival, compared with those who did not face EAD (NoEAD), 96% and 96% for EAD vs. 89% and 71% for NoEAD, respectively (p = 0.03). None of the donor/graft characteristics was associated with EAD even if the graft was moderately steatotic or fibrotic or from an aged donor. For the first time, this study shows that macrovesicular steatosis >30% might be a warning factor involved in the risk of graft loss or a cause of graft discard after the MP treatment. On the other hand, the MP seems to be useful in reducing the donor and graft weight in the development of EAD.

UNASSIGNED: Postreperfusion liver biopsy (PRB) can assess the degree of ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The influence of IRI on graft outcomes and overall survival is controversial.
UNASSIGNED: To determine the correlation between the severity of IRI in PRB and overall graft and patient survival and, secondarily, to identify factors on PRB that predict poor graft outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent OLT using donation after brain death (DBD) with PRB. The severity of IRI in PRB was graded. Predictors of IRI were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis and the Kaplan-Meier with log rank test for the graft and overall survival, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: We included 280 OLTs (64.7%). The histopathological assessment of IRI severity was as follows: no IRI (N = 96, 34.3%), mild IRI (N = 65; 23.2%), moderate IRI (N = 101; 36.1%), and severe IRI (N = 18; 6.4%). The incidence rates of initial good graft function (IGGF), primary nonfunction and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) were 32.5%, 3.9%, and 18.6%, respectively. Severe IRI was associated with a lower incidence of IGGF (OR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.12-0.92; P = 0.03). Patients with severe IRI tended to have a higher incidence of EAD (33.2% vs. 18.6, P = 0.23). The cold ischemia time was an independent predictor of severe IRI on the multivariate analysis. Severe IRI was associated with poor 1- and 5-year overall survival rates (67% and 44%, respectively, compared with 84 and 68% in nonsevere IRI). Patients with severe IRI exhibited worse graft and overall survival.
UNASSIGNED: Cold ischemia time predicts the development of severe IRI. Patients with severe IRI show worse graft and overall survival and a lower incidence of IGGF, suggesting that histopathological findings could be useful for identifying patients at high risk of worse outcomes after OLT.

Early series in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults demonstrated a lower safe limit of graft volume standard liver volume ratio 25%-45%. A subsequent worldwide large LDLT series proposed a 0.8 graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) to define small-for-size graft (SFSG) in adult LDLT. Thereafter, researchers identified innate and inevitable factors including changes in liver volume during imaging studies and graft shrinkage due to perfusion solution. Although the definition of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) advocated in the 2000s was mainly based on prolonged cholestasis and ascites output, the term SFSS was inadequate to describe clinical manifestations possibly caused by multiple factors. Thus, the term \"early allograft dysfunction (EAD),\" characterized by total bilirubin >10 mg/dL or coagulopathy with international normalized ratio >1.6 on day 7, has become prevalent to describe graft dysfunction including SFSS after LDLT. Although various efforts have been made to overcome EAD in LDLT, graft selection to maintain an expected GRWR >0.8 and full venous drainage, as well as inflow modulation using splenic artery ligation, have become standard in recent LDLT.

The liver-gut axis has been identified as crucial mediator of liver regeneration. Thus, the use of a T-tube in liver transplantation (LT), which interrupts the enterohepatic bile circulation, may potentially have a detrimental effect on the early allograft functional recovery. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 261 patients transplanted with a whole liver graft, with a duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, who did not develop any surgical complication within postoperative day 14. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was defined according to the criteria of Olthoff et al. (EAD-O), and graded according to the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF) score. EAD-O developed in 24.7% of recipients and the median MEAF score was 4.0 [interquartile range 2.9-5.5]. Both MEAF and EAD predicted 90-day post-LT mortality. A T-tube was used in 49.4% of cases (n = 129). After a propensity score matching for donor age, cold and warm ischemia time, donor risk index, balance of risk score, Child-Pugh class C, and MELD score, the T-tube group showed a significantly higher prevalence of EAD-O and value of MEAF than the no-T-tube group (EAD-O: 29 [34.1%] vs 16 [19.0%], p = 0.027; MEAF 4.5 [3.5-5.7] vs 3.7 [2.9-5.0], p = 0.014). In conclusion, T-tube use in LT may be a risk factor for EAD and higher MEAF, irrespective of graft quality and severity of pre-LT liver disease.