Drug utilization

药物利用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注射抗生素的消费没有得到广泛的研究,尽管注射剂占抗生素费用的主要份额。这项研究旨在了解印度国家一级口服和注射抗生素消费的份额和成本。以及喀拉拉邦公共和私营部门在注射剂的供应和成本中所占的份额。
    我们使用了PharmaTrac私营部门销售数据集和喀拉拉邦医疗服务公司公共部门采购数据集。利用世卫组织的准入,观看,储备(AWARE)和解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类,我们估计了每年的总消费量和人均消费量,和年度总数,每个定义的每日剂量(DDD),和人均注射支出。
    尽管在国家一级消耗的抗生素总量中,有94.9%是口服制剂,总支出的35.8%用于注射。在喀拉拉邦,私营部门抗生素总支出中约有33%用于注射剂,相比之下,公共部门的这一比例约为25%。与私营部门(n=69)相比,公共部门使用更少的可注射抗生素制剂(n=21)。与公共部门相比,私营部门的每个DDD成本要高得多。尽管仅占成本份额的6.3%,公共部门提供了31.4%的注射剂,表明非常高的效率。在这两个部门,观察组抗生素的消耗量明显高于访问组抗生素的成本,例如,私营部门的数量几乎是每个DDD的两倍,价格是每个DDD的1.75倍。储备群体抗生素的消费份额最低(私营部门为0.61%),但每个DDD的成本最高(超过Access的16倍)。
    与私营部门相比,公共部门在抗生素供应方面显示出更高的成本效率。适当的抗生素使用不能仅通过药品价格控制来实现,而是需要通过结构化的管理计划与私人提供者广泛接触。
    这项研究试图了解公共和私营部门在印度抗生素注射量和费用中所占的份额。特别是在喀拉拉邦。我们使用药品销售数据(PharmaTrac)和喀拉拉邦政府采购数据进行分析。这项研究是由波士顿大学(美国)的研究人员进行的,印度公共卫生基金会(印度),全球发展中心(英国和美国),INSEAD(法国)并得到了惠康基金的资助.我们使用世界卫生组织将抗生素分类为Access,观看,储备(Aware),这是基于抵抗出现的风险。我们估计了年度总消费量和人均消费量,和年度总数,每剂量,和人均注射支出。我们发现,尽管抗生素注射不到全国抗生素消费总量的6%,占总支出的35%以上。喀拉拉邦的数据显示,公共部门通过使用更少的配方提供三分之一的抗生素注射剂量,显示出更高的效率,只有6%的成本分摊。储备组抗生素,构成最低的消费份额,每个剂量的成本最高(超过Access抗生素的16倍)。总之,与私营部门相比,公共部门在可注射抗生素供应方面显示出更高的成本效益。适当的抗生素使用需要通过结构化的管理计划与私人提供者广泛接触。
    UNASSIGNED: Consumption of injectable antibiotics is not widely studied, despite injectables constitute a major share of antibiotic cost. This study aimed to understand the share of oral and injectable antibiotic consumption and cost at the national level in India, and the public and private sector shares in the provision and cost of injectables in Kerala state.
    UNASSIGNED: We used the PharmaTrac private sector sales dataset and the Kerala Medical Services Corporation public sector procurement dataset. Using WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classifications, we estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per defined daily dose (DDD), and per-capita spending on injectables.
    UNASSIGNED: Although 94.9% of total antibiotics consumed at the national level were oral preparations, 35.8% of total spending were on injectables. In Kerala , around 33% of total antibiotic spending in the private sector were for injectables, compared to around 25% in the public sector. The public sector used fewer injectable antibiotic formulations (n=21) compared the private sector (n=69). The cost per DDD was significantly higher in the private sector as compared to the public sector. Despite only accounting for 6.3% of the cost share, the public sector provided 31.4% of injectables, indicating very high efficiency. Across both sectors, Watch group antibiotics were significantly more consumed and at a significantly higher cost than Access group antibiotics, for example in nearly double the quantity and at 1.75 times the price per DDD in the private sector. Reserve group antibiotics made up the lowest consumption share (0.61% in the private sector), but at the highest cost per DDD (over 16 times that of Access).
    UNASSIGNED: Public sector showed higher cost efficiency in antibiotic provisioning compared to private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use cannot be achieved through drug price control alone but requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.
    This study tried to understand the share of public and private sectors in the volume and cost of antibiotic injections in India, particularly in the state of Kerala. We used drug sales data (PharmaTrac) and Kerala government procurement data for the analysis. The study was conducted by researchers at Boston University (USA), Public Health Foundation of India (India), Center for Global Development (UK and USA), and INSEAD (France), and was supported by a Wellcome grant. We analysed data using the World Health Organization classification of antibiotics into Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe), which is based on the risk of emergence of resistance. We estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per-dose, and per-capita spending on injectables. We found that although antibiotic injections were less than six percent of total antibiotics consumed nationally, they accounted for more than 35% of total spending. Kerala data showed that the public sector showed higher efficiency by providing one-third of antibiotic injection doses using fewer formulations, with only six percent of the cost share. Reserve group antibiotics, which made up the lowest consumption share, had the highest cost per dose (over 16 times that of Access antibiotics). In conclusion, public sector showed higher cost efficiency in injectable antibiotic provisioning compared with private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对照试验已证明与某些体重管理药物(WMMs)相关的成功体重减轻。然而,关于WMM在退伍军人事务部(VA)患者中的处方模式以及疗效和安全性的实际数据有限.
    评估:利拉鲁肽WMM的利用模式,纳曲酮/安非他酮,奥利司他,芬特明,苯丁胺/托吡酯,和塞马鲁肽;三岁时体重减轻,六,十二,超过12个月;安全性;和治疗障碍。
    回顾,我们使用2020年3月1日至2022年3月31日期间在37个VA医疗中心新启动的WMM门诊退伍军人的电子健康记录进行了横断面用药评估(MUE).图表审查用于确定WMM利用率和临床反应捕获率,定义为最终重量的5%和10%或更大的重量损失,不良药物事件(ADE),不坚持,和中断。针对特定地点的调查评估了当地的做法和障碍。
    在1959年合格的退伍军人中,塞马鲁肽,苯丁胺/托吡酯,奥利司他是最常见的处方。芬特明/托吡酯的临床反应最高,利拉鲁肽,还有semaglutide.纳曲酮/安非他酮和芬特明表现出最高和最低的ADE率,分别。根据现场报告,WMM利用和成功治疗的潜在障碍是药物短缺,患者对治疗过程的看法,个人喜好,和VAWMM使用标准。
    相对于临床试验观察到较小的体重减轻和较高的停药率。MUE数据可以更好地评估退伍军人处方WMM的收益和风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Controlled trials have demonstrated successful weight loss associated with certain weight management medications (WMMs). However, there are limited real-world data on prescribing patterns and efficacy and safety profiles of WMMs in Veterans Affairs (VA) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate: utilization patterns of WMMs liraglutide, naltrexone/bupropion, orlistat, phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, and semaglutide; weight loss at three, six, twelve, and more than 12 months; safety; and treatment barriers.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective, cross-sectional medication use evaluation (MUE) was conducted using electronic health records of outpatient Veterans newly initiated on WMMs at 37 VA Medical Centers between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2022. Chart review was used to identify WMM utilization and capture rates of clinical response, defined as 5% and 10% or greater weight loss at the final weight, adverse drug events (ADEs), non-adherence, and discontinuations. Site-specific surveys evaluated local practices and barriers.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1959 eligible Veterans, semaglutide, phentermine/topiramate, and orlistat were most frequently prescribed. The clinical response was highest among phentermine/topiramate, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine demonstrated the highest and lowest ADE rates, respectively. Potential barriers to WMM utilization and successful treatment by site reports were drug shortages, patient perceptions of therapeutic course, personal preferences, and VA WMM use criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: Smaller weight loss and higher discontinuation rates were observed relative to clinical trials. The MUE data allow for better assessment of benefits and risks for Veterans prescribed WMMs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:物质使用障碍(SUD)和有问题的物质使用是全球公共卫生问题,对身体健康和社会心理健康具有重要的多方面影响。SUD的影响不仅限于个人,还包括家庭,同时给社区带来经济和社会负担。尽管以家庭为中心的干预措施在解决SUD方面表现出了希望,它们在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的实施和影响仍未得到充分重视。
    方法:根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查方案,OVIDMedline采用了系统的搜索策略,Embase,PsycINFO,WebofScience-CoreCollection,从2024年2月22日至2024年2月26日,全球卫生和CINAHL,以确定相关研究集中在LMIC中以家庭为中心的SUD干预措施,没有出版时间和语言限制。两名独立的审稿人将筛选标题,摘要和全文,通过讨论或第三方审查解决差异。以结构化形式绘制的提取数据将通过图表或表可视化,重点关注以家庭为中心的干预措施在LMIC中对SUD的可行性和影响。对于定性研究,研究结果将以专题组的形式进行综合和呈现,对于报告定量结果的研究,具体的健康,包括SUD和社会心理,结果将被综合,与人口保持一致,概念和上下文框架。
    背景:这些关于物质使用的数据,SUD患者及其家庭的社会心理结果和观点将以叙事形式呈现,突出模式并确定研究差距。这篇综述旨在综合现有证据,以家庭为中心的干预措施,以改善LMIC中SUD患者的物质使用和/或社会心理结果,并寻求为未来的政策和实践提供信息。此范围审查不需要道德批准,并将披露对审查方案的修改。调查结果将通过会议记录和同行评审出版物传播。
    BACKGROUND: Substance use disorder (SUD) and problematic substance use are global public health concerns with significant multifaceted implications for physical health and psychosocial well-being. The impact of SUD extends beyond the individual to their family while imposing financial and social burdens on the community. Though family-centred interventions have shown promise in addressing SUD, their implementation and impact in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain underexplored.
    METHODS: Per Joanna Briggs Institute\'s scoping review protocol, a systematic search strategy was employed across OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science-Core Collection, Global Health and CINAHL from 22 February 2024 to 26 February 2024, to identify relevant studies focused on family-centred interventions for SUD in LMIC, devoid of publication time and language constraints. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or third-party reviews. The extracted data charted in a structured form will be visualised by diagrams or tables, focusing on the feasibility and impact of family-centred interventions for SUD in LMIC. For qualitative studies, the findings will be synthesised and presented in thematic clusters, and for studies that report quantitative outcomes, specific health, including SUD and psychosocial, outcomes will be synthesised, aligning with the Population, Concept and Context framework.
    BACKGROUND: These data on substance use, psychosocial outcomes and perspectives of individuals with SUD and their families will be presented in narrative format, highlighting patterns and identifying research gaps. This review aims to synthesise the existing evidence on family-centred interventions for improving substance use and/or psychosocial outcomes in individuals with SUD in LMIC and seeks to inform future policy and practice. Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review, and modifications to the review protocol will be disclosed. Findings will be disseminated through conference proceedings and peer-reviewed publication.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于全球抗生素使用的增加和抗生素耐药性的发展,评估抗生素消费模式的研究变得越来越必要。这项研究旨在评估在西岸北部最大的外科医院使用抗生素的数量和质量。巴勒斯坦。
    方法:进行了一项采用全人口抽样方法的观察性回顾性研究,以收集西岸北部一家大型政府医院骨科部门的住院患者的数据,巴勒斯坦。数据从患者档案中收集,并使用解剖治疗化学和定义的每日剂量(ATC/DDD)方法进行评估,和药物利用90%(DU90%)指数。ATC/DDD方法,由世界卫生组织(WHO)设计,作为一个值得信赖和标准化的工具,允许测量和比较不同背景下的抗生素利用率。抗生素处方使用世界卫生组织访问进行分类,观察和储量分类(WHOAWARE)。
    结果:在2020年住院并纳入研究的896名患者中,61.9%是男性,女性占38.1%。接受抗生素治疗的患者比例为97.0%,总体抗生素使用率为107.91DDD/100床天。最常用的抗生素是头孢唑啉(50.30DDD/100床天),其次是庆大霉素(24.15DDD/100床天)和头孢曲松(17.35DDD/100床天)。DU90%部分包括四种不同的试剂。根据WHOAWaRe政策对抗生素进行分类显示,75.9%的抗生素是从访问清单中开出的。
    结论:这项研究是为解决巴勒斯坦日益严重的抗生素耐药性问题所做努力的一部分。我们的结果表明,巴勒斯坦一家大型政府医院的骨科部门中抗菌剂的消费量相对较高。这项研究的结果为决策者制定旨在规范抗生素处方的政策提供了有价值的见解。这项研究还旨在研究抗生素处方模式,提供了对巴勒斯坦抗生素消费现状的更清晰的了解。它还强调了抗生素管理和监测计划的必要性。
    BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating the patterns of antibiotic consumption are becoming increasingly necessary as a result of the increased use of antibiotics and development of antibiotic resistance globally. This study aimed to evaluate the use of antibiotics in in terms of both quantity and quality at the largest surgical hospital in the north of the West Bank, Palestine.
    METHODS: An observational retrospective study with a total population sampling method was conducted to collect data from the inpatients of the orthopedic departments of a large governmental hospital in the northern West Bank, Palestine. The data were collected from patients\' files and evaluated using the anatomical therapeutic chemical and defined daily dose (ATC/DDD) methodology, and the drug utilization 90% (DU90%) index. The ATC/DDD methodology, designed by the World Health Organization (WHO), as a well-trusted and standardized tool that allows measuring and comparing antibiotic utilization across different contexts. Antibiotic prescriptions were classified using the World Health Organization Access, Watch and Reserve classification (WHO AWaRe).
    RESULTS: Of the 896 patients who were admitted to the hospital in the year 2020 and included in the study, 61.9% were males, and 38.1% were females. The percentage of patients who received antibiotics was 97.0%, and the overall antibiotic usage was 107.91 DDD/100 bed days. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was cefazolin (50.30 DDD/100 bed days), followed by gentamicin (24.15 DDD/100 bed days) and ceftriaxone (17.35 DDD/100 bed days). The DU90% segment comprised four different agents. Classification of antibiotics according to the WHO AWaRe policy revealed that 75.9% of antibiotics were prescribed from the access list.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study comes as part of the efforts exerted to combat the growing problem of antibiotic resistance in Palestine. Our results showed that the consumption of antibacterial agents in the orthopedic unit at a large governmental hospital in Palestine was relatively high. The results of this study provide valuable insights for the decision-makers to create policies aimed at regulating antibiotic prescriptions. This study also aims to provide a look into the antibiotic prescription patterns, offering a clearer understanding of the current situation of antibiotic consumption in Palestine. It also emphasizes the need for antibiotic stewardship and surveillance programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:HIV耐药性对联合国结束HIV/AIDS流行的目标提出了挑战。整合酶链转移抑制剂(InSTI)dolutegravir,具有更高的电阻屏障,2019年被世界卫生组织认可为一线,二线和三线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。杜鲁特格韦在ART中的这种多种作用可能有助于杜鲁特格韦耐药性的出现。
    方法:嵌套在国际流行病学数据库中评估艾滋病(IeDEA),DTGRESIST是一项针对撒哈拉以南非洲感染艾滋病毒的成年人和青少年的多中心研究,亚洲,以及南美和中美洲在基于dolutegravir的ART上经历了病毒学失败。在病毒学失败的时候,全血将被收集和处理以制备血浆或干血点。在德班的实验室,墨西哥城和曼谷将进行基因分型。分析将集中在(1)在dolutegravir上经历病毒学失败的人和(2)那些开始或切换到这种方案并有病毒学失败的风险的人。对于人口(1),结果将是任何InSTI耐药突变,并且对于群体(2)病毒学失败被定义为病毒载量>1000拷贝/mL。表型测试将集中于具有主要InSTI抗性突变的非B亚型病毒。贝叶斯进化模型将探索和预测治疗失败的基因型。该研究将具有中等统计能力来检测主要HIV-1亚型之间耐药突变患病率的差异;识别病毒学失败的风险因素的能力充足,分析与单个InSTI耐药突变相关的因素的能力有限。
    背景:研究方案得到夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省大学生物医学研究伦理委员会的批准,南非和伯尔尼州道德委员会,瑞士。所有网站都参加了国际流行病学数据库以评估艾滋病,并获得了当地伦理委员会的伦理批准以收集其他数据。
    背景:NCT06285110。
    BACKGROUND: HIV drug resistance poses a challenge to the United Nation\'s goal of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir, which has a higher resistance barrier, was endorsed by the WHO in 2019 for first-line, second-line and third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). This multiplicity of roles of dolutegravir in ART may facilitate the emergence of dolutegravir resistance.
    METHODS: Nested within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA), DTG RESIST is a multicentre study of adults and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South and Central America who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir-based ART. At the time of virological failure, whole blood will be collected and processed to prepare plasma or dried blood spots. Laboratories in Durban, Mexico City and Bangkok will perform genotyping. Analyses will focus on (1) individuals who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir and (2) those who started or switched to such a regimen and were at risk of virological failure. For population (1), the outcome will be any InSTI drug resistance mutations, and for population (2) virological failure is defined as a viral load >1000 copies/mL. Phenotypic testing will focus on non-B subtype viruses with major InSTI resistance mutations. Bayesian evolutionary models will explore and predict treatment failure genotypes. The study will have intermediate statistical power to detect differences in resistance mutation prevalence between major HIV-1 subtypes; ample power to identify risk factors for virological failure and limited power for analysing factors associated with individual InSTI drug resistance mutations.
    BACKGROUND: The research protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. All sites participate in International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS and have obtained ethics approval from their local ethics committee to collect additional data.
    BACKGROUND: NCT06285110.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗菌素耐药性是全球公共卫生关注的焦点。为了解决人道主义环境中医院抗生素消费数据和抗菌素耐药性监测系统缺乏的问题,我们估计了6家医院的抗生素用量,目的是提出改进抗菌药物管理计划的建议.
    方法:该研究包括由无国界医生组织支持的六家医院:Boost-Afghanistan,Kutupalong-孟加拉国,巴拉卡和姆韦索-刚果民主共和国,库勒-埃塞俄比亚,和南苏丹。收集了2018年至2020年36,984名住院患者的数据和抗生素消费数据。根据世界卫生组织获取观察储备分类对抗生素进行分类。通过规定的每日剂量(DDDs)/1000床-天来测量总抗生素消耗。
    结果:所有医院的平均抗生素消耗量为2745DDDs/1000病床天。Boost医院的抗生素消费量最高(4157DDDs/1000床位天),Bentiu最低(1598DDDs/1000床位天)。在所有医院,大多数使用访问抗生素(69.7%),其次是观察抗生素(30.1%)。消耗最多的抗生素是阿莫西林(23.5%),阿莫西林和克拉维酸(14%),和甲硝唑(13.2%)。在所有项目中,在研究期间,平均每年抗生素消费量减少了22.3%,主要是由于阿富汗Boost医院的减少。
    结论:这是第一项在人道主义环境下通过DDD指标评估医院抗生素消耗量的研究。项目医院的抗生素消费量高于非人道主义环境报告的消费量。医院应实施常规系统的抗生素消费监测制度,伴随着处方审计和点流行调查,告知抗生素使用的数量和适当性,并支持人道主义环境中的抗生素管理工作。
    BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is of great global public health concern. In order to address the paucity of antibiotic consumption data and antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems in hospitals in humanitarian settings, we estimated antibiotic consumption in six hospitals with the aim of developing recommendations for improvements in antimicrobial stewardship programs.
    METHODS: Six hospitals supported by Médecins sans Frontières were included in the study: Boost-Afghanistan, Kutupalong-Bangladesh, Baraka and Mweso-Democratic Republic of Congo, Kule-Ethiopia, and Bentiu-South Sudan. Data for 36,984 inpatients and antibiotic consumption data were collected from 2018 to 2020. Antibiotics were categorized per World Health Organization Access Watch Reserve classification. Total antibiotic consumption was measured by Defined Daily Doses (DDDs)/1000 bed-days.
    RESULTS: Average antibiotic consumption in all hospitals was 2745 DDDs/1000 bed-days. Boost hospital had the highest antibiotic consumption (4157 DDDs/1000 bed-days) and Bentiu the lowest (1598 DDDs/1000 bed-days). In all hospitals, Access antibiotics were mostly used (69.7%), followed by Watch antibiotics (30.1%). The most consumed antibiotics were amoxicillin (23.5%), amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (14%), and metronidazole (13.2%). Across all projects, mean annual antibiotic consumption reduced by 22.3% during the study period, mainly driven by the reduction in Boost hospital in Afghanistan.
    CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to assess antibiotic consumption by DDD metric in hospitals in humanitarian settings. Antibiotic consumption in project hospitals was higher than those reported from non-humanitarian settings. Routine systematic antibiotic consumption monitoring systems should be implemented in hospitals, accompanied by prescribing audits and point-prevalence surveys, to inform about the volume and appropriateness of antibiotic use and to support antimicrobial stewardship efforts in humanitarian settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性咳嗽(CC),咳嗽持续>8周,是社区中常见的多因素综合征,尤其是老年人。方法:使用预先存在的算法来识别2011-2018年医疗保险受益人中的CC患者,在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们通过重复的横断面分析研究了加巴喷丁类药物的使用趋势,并使用基于群组的轨迹模型(GBTM)确定了不同的使用轨迹.没有CC但具有与咳嗽相关的任何呼吸状况的个体作为比较组。结果:在CC患者中,gabapentinoid的使用量从2011年的18.6%增加到2018年的24.1%(p=0.002),在非CC队列中观察到类似的上升趋势,但总体使用率较低(14.7%至18.4%;p<0.001)。CC患者的呼吸道和非呼吸道合并症负担明显较高,以及与非CC队列相比,更多的医疗服务和药物使用。GBTM分析确定了CC和非CC患者的三种不同的gabapentinoid利用轨迹:无使用(77.3%vs.84.5%),低使用率(13.9%与10.3%),和高使用率(8.8%与5.2%)。结论:未来的研究需要评估在真实世界中难治性或原因不明的CC患者中使用加巴喷丁的安全性和有效性。
    Background: Chronic cough (CC), characterized as a cough lasting >8 weeks, is a common multi-factorial syndrome in the community, especially in older adults. Methods: Using a pre-existing algorithm to identify patients with CC within the 2011-2018 Medicare beneficiaries, we examined trends in gabapentinoid use through repeated cross-sectional analyses and identified distinct utilization trajectories using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) in a retrospective cohort study. Individuals without CC but with any respiratory conditions related to cough served as a comparator group. Results: Among patients with CC, gabapentinoid use increased from 18.6% in 2011 to 24.1% in 2018 (p = 0.002), with a similar upward trend observed in the non-CC cohort but with overall lower usage (14.7% to 18.4%; p < 0.001). Patients with CC had significantly higher burdens of respiratory and non-respiratory comorbidities, as well as greater healthcare service and medication use compared to the non-CC cohort. The GBTM analyses identified three distinct gabapentinoid utilization trajectories for CC and non-CC patients: no use (77.3% vs. 84.5%), low use (13.9% vs. 10.3%), and high use (8.8% vs. 5.2%). Conclusions: Future studies are needed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gabapentinoid use in patients with refractory or unexplained CC in real-world settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估越南的抗生素消费和支出模式。
    方法:这是一项横断面研究。
    方法:本研究使用2018年至2022年公开宣布的抗生素采购数据作为抗生素消费的代表。
    方法:这项研究包括在越南63个省的390个采购单位中中标5年,总支出为128亿美元,约占国家药品支出的20-30%。
    方法:抗生素由WHOAWaRe分类(访问,观察和储备)分类。
    方法:主要结果是抗生素消耗量在确定日剂量(DDD)和支出中的比例。
    结果:全身抗生素的DDDs共254万,占这些公共卫生机构购买药品总支出的24.7%(3.16亿美元)。Access组抗生素的总体比例在5年内占抗生素总消费量的40.9%至53.8%。
    结论:该分析确定了一个未实现的目标,即至少60%的抗生素消费是接入组抗生素,以及越南公立医院非必需抗生素支出的不合理份额。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the patterns of antibiotic consumption and expenditure in Vietnam.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: This study used data of antibiotic procurement that was publicly announced from 2018 to 2022 as a proxy for antibiotic consumption.
    METHODS: This study included winning bids from 390 procurement units in 63 provinces in Vietnam for 5 years with a total expenditure of US$ 12.8 billions that represented for approximately 20-30% of the national funds spend on medicines.
    METHODS: Antibiotics were classified by WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch and Reserve) classification.
    METHODS: The primary outcomes were the proportions of antibiotic consumptions in number of defined daily doses (DDD) and expenditures.
    RESULTS: There was a total of 2.54 million DDDs of systemic antibiotics, which accounted for 24.7% (US $3.16 billions) of total expenditure for medicines purchased by these public health facilities. The overall proportion of Access group antibiotics ranges from 40.9% to 53.8% of the total antibiotic consumption over 5 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identifies an unmet target of at least 60% of the total antibiotic consumption being Access group antibiotics and an unreasonable share of expenditure for non-essential antibiotics in public hospitals in Vietnam.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在移植后的免疫抑制中,使用了几种多药物方法,涉及钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI:他克莫司-TAC或环孢菌素-CsA),抗代谢药(抗代谢药),哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶抑制剂(mTORis),和皮质类固醇。然而,缺乏有关器官免疫抑制治疗及其时空变异性的数据。
    使用健康信息系统进行了一项意大利多中心观察性队列研究。2009-2019年期间发生移植的患者,居住在四个地区(威尼托,伦巴第,拉齐奥,和撒丁岛)报名参加。移植后免疫抑制方案按器官进行评估,区域,和年份。
    最常用的方案是肾脏[他克莫司(TAC)+抗M+皮质类固醇=41.5%]和心脏[环孢菌素+抗M+皮质类固醇=36.6%]的三联药物治疗和肝脏受者的双联药物治疗(TAC+皮质类固醇=35.4%)。在药物和使用的药物数量方面,地区和年份之间出现了一些差异。
    发现移植后免疫抑制治疗存在高度异质性。需要进一步的研究,以调查这种变异性的原因,并评估在临床实践中采用的治疗方案的风险效益。
    UNASSIGNED: In immunosuppression after transplantation, several multi-drug approaches are used, involving calcineurin inhibitors (CNI: tacrolimus-TAC or cyclosporine-CsA), antimetabolites (antiMs), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis), and corticosteroids. However, data on immunosuppressive therapy by organ and its space-time variability are lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: An Italian multicentre observational cohort study was conducted using health information systems. Patients with incident transplant during 2009-2019 and resident in four regions (Veneto, Lombardy, Lazio, and Sardinia) were enrolled. The post-transplant immunosuppressive regimen was evaluated by organ, region, and year.
    UNASSIGNED: The most dispensed regimen was triple-drug therapy for the kidneys [tacrolimus (TAC) + antiM + corticosteroids = 41.5%] and heart [cyclosporin  + antiM + corticosteroids = 36.6%] and double-drug therapy for liver recipients (TAC + corticosteroids = 35.4%). Several differences between regions and years emerged with regard to agents and the number of drugs used.
    UNASSIGNED: A high heterogeneity in immunosuppressive therapy post-transplant was found. Further studies are needed in order to investigate the reasons for this variability and to evaluate the risk-benefit profile of treatment schemes adopted in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于情感障碍的高患病率和相关痛苦,情感障碍对公共卫生造成了重大负担。本研究通过提供对药物使用趋势的见解,解决了当前文献和临床实践中的差距。这可以告知治疗策略和优化患者护理。该研究旨在调查药物利用模式,特别关注定义的每日剂量/1000/天,在三级护理医院精神科门诊就诊的个人中。
    方法:这个横截面,前瞻性药物利用研究包括600名18岁及以上的情感障碍患者。研究期为12个月,从2021年3月到2022年2月。人口统计数据,诊断,治疗,和咨询进行收集和分析,采用描述性统计。
    结果:在分析的600名患者中,双相情感障碍是最普遍的(239名患者,39.83%),其次是抑郁症(208名患者,34.67%)。三联疗法是最常见的处方方案,占308次遭遇(51.33%)。每次遇到的平均药物数量为3.75±1.01。为594名患者或其亲属提供了心理治疗和药物咨询相结合的课程,占总遭遇的99%。
    结论:该研究强调了三联疗法在控制情感障碍方面的普遍应用,尤其是双相情感障碍和躁狂症。有效利用基本药物清单和全面的患者咨询强调了精神科门诊环境中整体护理的重要性。
    结论:鉴于三联疗法的高患病率,有必要进一步研究这种治疗方法的有效性和安全性.此外,继续强调患者教育和咨询可以提高情感障碍患者的治疗依从性和总体结局.
    BACKGROUND: Affective disorders impose a significant burden on public health due to their high prevalence and associated suffering. This study addresses gaps in current literature and clinical practice by providing insights into medication usage trends, which can inform treatment strategies and optimize patient care. The study aims to investigate drug utilization patterns, particularly focusing on defined daily dose/1000/day, among individuals attending a psychiatric outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional, prospective drug utilization study included 600 affective disorder patients aged 18 years and above. The study period spanned 12 months, from March 2021 to February 2022. Data on demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and counseling were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
    RESULTS:  Among the 600 patients analyzed, bipolar mood disorder was the most prevalent (239 patients, 39.83%), followed by depressive disorder (208 patients, 34.67%). Triple therapy was the most common prescription regimen, accounting for 308 encounters (51.33%). The average number of drugs per encounter was 3.75 ± 1.01. A combination of psychotherapy and medication counseling sessions was provided to 594 patients or their relatives, representing 99% of the total encounters.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the prevalent use of triple therapy in managing affective disorders, especially bipolar mood disorder and mania disorder. Effective utilization of essential drug lists and comprehensive patient counseling underscores the importance of holistic care in psychiatric outpatient settings.
    CONCLUSIONS:  Given the high prevalence of triple therapy, further research into the efficacy and safety of this treatment approach is warranted. Additionally, continued emphasis on patient education and counseling can enhance treatment adherence and overall outcomes in individuals with affective disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号