%0 Journal Article %T Temporal and spatial variability of immunosuppressive therapies in transplant patients: An observational study in Italy. %A Marino ML %A Rosa AC %A Finocchietti M %A Bellini A %A Poggi FR %A Massari M %A Spila Alegiani S %A Masiero L %A Ricci A %A Bedeschi G %A Puoti F %A Cardillo M %A Pierobon S %A Nordio M %A Ferroni E %A Zanforlini M %A Piccolo G %A Leoni O %A Ledda S %A Carta P %A Garau D %A Lucenteforte E %A Davoli M %A Addis A %A Belleudi V %J Front Transplant %V 1 %N 0 %D 2022 %M 38994384 暂无%R 10.3389/frtra.2022.1060621 %X UNASSIGNED: In immunosuppression after transplantation, several multi-drug approaches are used, involving calcineurin inhibitors (CNI: tacrolimus-TAC or cyclosporine-CsA), antimetabolites (antiMs), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis), and corticosteroids. However, data on immunosuppressive therapy by organ and its space-time variability are lacking.
UNASSIGNED: An Italian multicentre observational cohort study was conducted using health information systems. Patients with incident transplant during 2009-2019 and resident in four regions (Veneto, Lombardy, Lazio, and Sardinia) were enrolled. The post-transplant immunosuppressive regimen was evaluated by organ, region, and year.
UNASSIGNED: The most dispensed regimen was triple-drug therapy for the kidneys [tacrolimus (TAC) + antiM + corticosteroids = 41.5%] and heart [cyclosporin  + antiM + corticosteroids = 36.6%] and double-drug therapy for liver recipients (TAC + corticosteroids = 35.4%). Several differences between regions and years emerged with regard to agents and the number of drugs used.
UNASSIGNED: A high heterogeneity in immunosuppressive therapy post-transplant was found. Further studies are needed in order to investigate the reasons for this variability and to evaluate the risk-benefit profile of treatment schemes adopted in clinical practice.