Decannulation

拔管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于气道阻塞和发育中的大脑,颅面畸形儿童的气管造口术拔管带来了挑战。这项研究旨在根据气管造口术的年龄和插管的持续时间比较拔管结果,以确定长期气管造口术儿童拔管的最佳时间。
    这项回顾性研究包括12名儿童,他们在单中心接受了长期气管造口术治疗颅面畸形的拔管。人口统计数据,临床特征,收集拔管过程和结果。将儿童分为两组:气管造口术时≤6岁(n=7)和>6岁(n=5)。
    所有儿童均成功拔管,无立即并发症。对1例轻度气管软化和1例声门下狭窄进行了拔管前治疗。与>6岁组相比,≤6岁的儿童在吞咽和说话方面表现出更好的术后适应性。值得注意的是,≤6年组早期和长期气管造口术与拔管后更容易适应相关.社交互动是另一个挑战,特别是对于>6岁组。
    气管造口术的时间和持续时间显著影响拔管后适应,可能是由于神经可塑性等因素,肌肉记忆和心理调节。这强调了全面护理的必要性,特别是对于年龄较大的孩子。儿童早期气管造口术可以使他们适应言语和吞咽技巧,缓解拔管后技能的重获。相反,具有完全发展技能的年龄较大的儿童在气管切开和拔管后可能很难重新学习它们。气管造口术的年龄和插管的持续时间会影响颅面畸形儿童的拔管结果。进一步的研究对于制定有针对性的干预措施以改善术后护理至关重要,特别是对于年龄较大的孩子。
    UNASSIGNED: Tracheostomy decannulation in children with craniofacial deformities poses challenges due to airway obstruction and the developing brain. This study aimed to compare decannulation outcomes based on age at tracheostomy and duration of cannulation so as to identify the best time for decannulation for children with long-term tracheostomy.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 12 children at a single centre who underwent decannulation after prolonged tracheostomy for craniofacial deformities. Data on demographics, clinical features, decannulation process and outcomes were collected. Children were divided into two groups: ≤6 years (n = 7) and >6 years (n = 5) at tracheostomy insertion.
    UNASSIGNED: All children underwent successful decannulation without immediate complications. One case of mild tracheomalacia and one of subglottic stenosis were treated pre-decannulation. Children ≤6 years demonstrated better post-operative adaptation in swallowing and speaking compared to the >6 years group. Notably, early and prolonged tracheostomy in the ≤6 years group was associated with easier adaptation post-decannulation. Social interaction was another challenge, particularly for the >6 years group.
    UNASSIGNED: The timing and duration of tracheostomy significantly impacts post-decannulation adaptation, likely due to factors such as neuroplasticity, muscle memory and psychological adjustment. This emphasises the need for comprehensive care, especially for older children. Early tracheostomy in children may allow them to adapt speech and swallowing skills, easing post-decannulation regain of skills. Conversely, older children with fully developed skills may struggle to relearn them after tracheostomy and decannulation. Age at tracheostomy and duration of cannulation influences decannulation outcomes in children with craniofacial deformities. Further research is crucial to develop targeted interventions for better post-operative care, particularly for older children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气管造口术后拔管是一个重要的过渡。很少报道拔管后的皮下气肿(SE)。我们,在这里,报告一例短期气管造口术拔管后皮下大量气肿,讨论SE的各种拔管方法和原因。我们报告并假设在这种情况下,用于气管造口术的紧密闭塞敷料方法可能是导致SE的原因。
    Decannulation following tracheostomy is an important transition. Subcutaneous emphysema (SE) following decannulation has been rarely reported. We, herein, report a case of massive subcutaneous emphysema following decannulation of a short-term tracheostomy, discuss the various decannulation methods and causes of SE. We report and hypothesize the tight occlusive dressing method for tracheostomy decannulation to be the possible cause of SE in the present case.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气管造口术是一种挽救生命的外科手术,通常在需要长时间机械通气的患者中进行。然而,拔管过程与各种可能影响患者预后的并发症有关.本研究旨在评估三级医院气管造口术患者在拔管过程中的并发症及其管理。考虑到先前插管引入的复杂性。
    进行了一项回顾性队列研究,涉及450名在规定时间内接受气管造口术的患者。有关人口特征的数据,并发症,分析了拔管过程中的管理策略。特别注意区分与气管造口术直接相关的并发症和先前插管可能影响的并发症。
    在450名患者中,250经历了轻微的并发症,如局部出血,氧饱和度,和轻微的感染。另有40人面临重大并发症,包括严重出血,气管损伤,和狭窄。年龄增加和气管造口术持续时间被确定为并发症的重要预测因素。药物治疗,手术干预,和呼吸治疗是采用的管理策略之一。气管造口术和先前插管引起的并发症之间的区别突出了对患者进行全面评估的必要性。
    与拔管相关的并发症经常发生,严重程度各不相同。有效识别和管理这些并发症对于改善患者预后至关重要。该研究提供了对拔管过程中遇到的挑战的重要见解,并强调了在气管造口拔管的管理中考虑先前插管史的必要性,以完善患者护理方案。
    UNASSIGNED: Tracheostomy is a life-saving surgical intervention commonly performed in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, the decannulation process is associated with various complications that can affect patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess complications and their management during decannulation in a cohort of tracheostomy patients at a tertiary care hospital, considering the complexities introduced by prior intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 450 patients who underwent tracheostomy during a stipulated timeframe. Data regarding demographic characteristics, complications, and management strategies during decannulation were analysed. Special attention was given to distinguishing between complications directly related to the tracheostomy procedure and those potentially influenced by previous intubation.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of the 450 patients, 250 experienced minor complications such as localized bleeding, oxygen desaturation, and minor infections. Another 40 faced major complications including severe haemorrhage, tracheal damage, and stenosis. Increasing age and tracheostomy duration were identified as significant predictors of complications. Pharmacological treatments, surgical interventions, and respiratory therapy were among the management strategies employed. The differentiation between complications arising from tracheostomy and prior intubation highlighted the need for comprehensive patient evaluation.
    UNASSIGNED: Complications associated with decannulation occur frequently with varying severity. Efficient recognition and management of these complications are vital for improving patient outcomes. The study provides important insights into the challenges experienced during the decannulation process and highlights the necessity of considering prior intubation history in the management of tracheostomy decannulation to refine patient care protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    因COVID-19引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者需要接受重症监护病房(ICU),并连续气管插管和有创机械通气。长期机械通气患者,可考虑经皮扩张气管造口术(PDT).这项回顾性分析包括2021年9月3日至2022年5月1日期间在伏伊伏丁那临床中心COVID医院ICU接受治疗并接受PDT的患者的临床数据。患者主要为男性(n=48;65.8%)。31例(42.5%)患者实现了机械通气撤机,25例(34.2%)患者实现了拔管。从聚合酶链反应SARSCoV-2阳性到PDT的平均时间为15.59±6.85天。PDT术前气管插管的平均时间为7.37±4.89天。机械通气的平均撤机时间为10.45±7.92天。25例(34.2%)患者平均拔管时间为19.60±11.81天。并发症为气管切开相关性出血(2例),气胸(4例),皮下气肿(1例)和环状软骨损伤(1例)。PDT是一个简单的,安全,和ICU中COVID-19患者的有效程序。
    Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 require intensive care unit (ICU) admission with consecutive endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. In patients with long-term mechanical ventilation, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) may be considered. This retrospective analysis includes clinical data on patients treated at the ICUs of the COVID Hospital of the Clinical Center of Vojvodina in the period from September 3, 2021 to May 1, 2022, and underwent PDT. Patients were predominantly male (n=48; 65.8%). Weaning from mechanical ventilation was achieved in 31 (42.5%) and decannulation in 25 (34.2%) patients. The mean time from polymerase chain reaction SARS CoV-2 positivity until PDT was 15.59±6.85 days. The mean time of endotracheal intubation before the PDT procedure was 7.37±4.89 days. The mean weaning time from mechanical ventilation was 10.45±7.92 days. Twenty-five (34.2%) patients were decannulated at the mean time of 19.60±11.81 days. The complications were tracheostomy related bleeding (2 patients), pneumothorax (4 patients), subcutaneous emphysema (1 patient) and cricoid cartilage injury (1 patient). PDT is a simple, safe, and effective procedure performed in COVID-19 patients in the ICU.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后长时间放置气管导管可导致严重的并发症。安全移除需要足够的独立呼吸和气道保护能力。因此,确定拔除气管导管(拔管)时间的重要因素对于安全有效的断奶至关重要。这项研究旨在确定TBI后进行气管造口术的丹麦人群中拔管时间的重要因素。
    方法:这是一项基于注册的回顾性队列研究。从2011-2021年的丹麦头部创伤数据库中选择患有中度和重度TBI和气管导管的受试者。将拔管时间计算为从损伤到拔管的时间。使用线性回归模型分析了代表人口统计学和临床特征的选定解释变量与拔管时间之间的关联。
    结果:共纳入324名受试者,中位拔管时间为44d。初步分析发现,在康复的最初4周内,吞咽能力的改善与拔管时间减少8.2d相关(95%CI-12.3至-4.2,P<.001)。整体感觉运动能力的变化使拔管时间减少了0.94(95%CI-0.78至-0.10,P=.03)d。从康复入院到4周随访的认知能力的变化并没有显着影响拔管的天数(P=.66)。二次分析显示,肺炎与24.4d的最大估计增加相关(95%CI15.9-32.9,P<.001),并且康复入院时认知功能的增加与拔管时间的显着减少相关。
    结论:这项研究发现,吞咽能力的变化是减少拔管时间的潜在重要因素。确定可以解释拔管时间差异的因素对患者预后至关重要,特别是如果这些因素是可以改变的,并且可以作为康复和治疗的目标。
    BACKGROUND: Prolonged tracheal tube placement following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause serious complications. Safe removal requires sufficient ability for independent breathing and airway protection. Thus, identifying important factors for time to removal of the tracheal tube (decannulation) is essential for safe and efficient weaning. This study aimed to identify significant factors for time to decannulation in a Danish population of subjects with tracheostomy after TBI.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective register-based cohort study. Subjects with moderate and severe TBI and a tracheal tube were selected from the Danish Head Trauma Database between 2011-2021. Time to decannulation was calculated as time from injury to decannulation. Associations between selected explanatory variables representing demographic and clinical characteristics and time to decannulation were analyzed using linear regression models.
    RESULTS: A total 324 subjects were included with a median of 44 d to decannulation. Primary analysis found that an improvement in swallowing ability during the initial 4 weeks of rehabilitation was associated with an 8.2 d reduction in time to decannulation (95% CI -12.3 to -4.2, P < .001). Change in overall sensorimotor ability reduced time to decannulation by 0.94 (95% CI -0.78 to -0.10, P = .03) d. Change in cognitive abilities from rehab admission to 4-week follow-up did not significantly affect the number of days to decannulation (P = .66). Secondary analysis showed pneumonia was associated with the largest estimated increase of 24.4 (95% CI 15.9-32.9, P < .001) d and that increased cognitive functioning at rehabilitation admission was associated with a significant reduction in time to decannulation.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a change in swallowing ability is a potentially significant factor for reducing time to decannulation. Identifying factors that could explain differences in time to decannulation is essential for patient outcomes, especially if these factors are modifiable and could be targeted in rehabilitation and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与成人相比,气管造口术的儿童由于气道解剖结构较小和医疗复杂性较大而具有较高的死亡率,并且面临危及生命的并发症的高风险。在新的气管造口术后,护理人员需要在出院回家前成功完成广泛的培训。在没有现实生活的情况下,对气管造口术紧急情况(如导管阻塞和意外拔管)的培训具有挑战性,亲身体验,但是模拟训练在改善护理人员知识和为紧急情况做准备时的舒适度方面显示出了有希望的效果。出院后再入院和急诊就诊很常见,许多人是因为呼吸道疾病。吸入抗生素通常用于治疗细菌性呼吸道感染。然而,目前尚无气管造口术相关呼吸系统疾病的标准化管理指南.尽管使用了标准化的去管协议,缺乏循证指南,常规多导睡眠图在拔管前的作用尚未解决。小儿气管造口术管理方面的一些知识空白为未来的研究提供了机会,以改善患者的预后。
    Tracheostomized children have higher mortality compared to adults due to smaller airway anatomy and greater medical complexity and are at high risk for life-threatening complications. Following new tracheostomy placement, caregivers are required to successfully complete extensive training before discharge home. Training for tracheostomy emergencies such as tube obstruction and accidental decannulation is challenging without real-life, hands-on experience, but simulation training has shown promising effects on improving caregiver knowledge and comfort in preparing for emergency situations. Readmissions and emergency department visits are common following discharge, with many due to respiratory illness. Inhaled antibiotics are frequently prescribed to treat bacterial respiratory infection. However, guidelines for standardized management of tracheostomy-related respiratory illness are not available. Although standardized decannulation protocols are utilized, evidence-based guidelines are lacking, and the role of routine polysomnogram prior to decannulation is unresolved. Several knowledge gaps in management of pediatric tracheostomy present the opportunity for future research to improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:充分的咳嗽或排气流量可以指示安全的气管造口术拔管与非侵入性管理的选择。经导管加帽的上气道的咳嗽峰值流量是神经肌肉障碍患者拔管准备的结果预测指标。然而,此阈值通常是在移除气管切开术管时测量的,这在中国文化上是不可接受的。这项研究的目的是评估使用气管造口管和说话瓣膜(CFSV)>100L/min测量的咳嗽流量作为拔管的临界值的可行性和安全性。
    方法:2019年1月至2022年9月在三级康复医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究。
    方法:气管切开置管时间延长的患者进行筛查。使用标准化的气管造口术拔管方案评估每位患者,其中CFSV大于100L/min表明患者的咳嗽能力足以进行拔管。CFSV与阈值和其他方案标准匹配的患者被拔管,随访6个月的再插管率和死亡率。
    结果:共筛查了218例患者,纳入了193例患者。共有105名患者接受了拔管,103例患者成功拔管,2名患者拔管失败,需要在48小时内重新插入气管造口管(失败率1.9%)。3例患者需要在6个月内重新插入或经喉插管。
    结论:CFSV大于100L/min可能是具有各种原发性疾病的患者使用气管造口管成功拔管的可靠阈值。
    背景:这项观察性研究未在网上注册。
    BACKGROUND: Adequate cough or exsufflation flow can indicate an option for safe tracheostomy decannulation to noninvasive management. Cough peak flow via the upper airways with the tube capped is an outcome predictor for decannulation readiness in patients with neuromuscular impairment. However, this threshold value is typically measured with tracheotomy tube removed, which is not acceptable culturally in China. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of using cough flow measured with tracheostomy tube and speaking valve (CFSV) > 100 L/min as a cutoff value for decannulation.
    METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted between January 2019 and September 2022 in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital.
    METHODS: Patients with prolonged tracheostomy tube placement were referred for screening. Each patient was assessed using a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol, in which CFSV greater than 100 L/min indicated that the patients\' cough ability was sufficient for decannulation. Patients whose CFSV matched the threshold value and other protocol criteria were decannulated, and the reintubation and mortality rates were followed-up for 6 months.
    RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were screened and 193 patients were included. A total of 105 patients underwent decannulation, 103 patients were decannulated successfully, and 2 patients decannulated failure, required reinsertion of the tracheostomy tube within 48 h (failure rate 1.9%). Three patients required reinsertion or translaryngeal intubation within 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: CFSV greater than 100 L/min could be a reliable threshold value for successful decannulation in patients with various primary diseases with a tracheostomy tube.
    BACKGROUND: This observational study was not registered online.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是为由于获得性脑损伤而患有气管造口术的患者制定跨学科的断奶协议(IWP),并评估IWP对拔管率和断奶时间的影响。专家小组在2018年完成了文献综述,以确定断奶过程中的基本标准。基于临床实践中的共识和可用性,指导断奶过程的标准包括在方案中.使用IWP,吞咽困难分级为严重,中度,或温和。断奶过程是通过一个协议来指导的,该协议规定了袖带放气的每日持续时间,直到拔管,以及治疗和康复干预措施的建议。纳入337份患者记录(实施前161份和实施后176份)的数据进行效果评估。住院期间的拔管率没有变化,分别为91%和实施前后90%(60天脱管率为68%vs.74%)。实施后,与实施前相比,断奶时间有所减少,危险比1.309(95CI:1.013;1.693),不会增加导管再插入或肺炎的风险。此外,在实施前后,中位住院时间为102天(IQR:73-138)和中位住院时间为90天(IQR:58-119)(p=0.061)。分别。鼓励就气管造口管的断奶方案进行科学辩论。
    The objective was to develop an interdisciplinary weaning protocol (IWP) for patients with tracheostomy tubes due to acquired brain injury, and to effect evaluate implementation of the IWP on decannulation rates and weaning duration. An expert panel completed a literature review in 2018 to identify essential criteria in the weaning process. Based on consensus and availability in clinical practice, criteria for guiding the weaning process were included in the protocol. Using the IWP, dysphagia is graded as either severe, moderate, or mild. The weaning process is guided through a protocol which specified the daily duration of cuff deflation until decannulation, along with recommendations for treatment and rehabilitation interventions. Data from 337 patient records (161 before and 176 after implementation) were included for effect evaluation. Decannulation rate during hospitalization was unchanged at 91% vs. 90% before and after implementation (decannulation rate at 60 days was 68% vs. 74%). After implementation, the weaning duration had decreased compared to before implementation, hazard ratio 1.309 (95%CI: 1.013; 1.693), without any increased risk of tube-reinsertion or pneumonia. Furthermore, a tendency toward decreased length of stay was seen with median 102 days (IQR: 73-138) and median 90 days (IQR: 58-119) (p = 0.061) before and after implementation, respectively. Scientific debate on weaning protocols for tracheostomy tubes are encouraged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言尽管有几种小儿气管造口术拔管方案,但在实践中仍然存在巨大的变异性。已经研究了气管造口术封盖对拔管的影响,但说话瓣膜(SV)的作用尚不清楚。目标鉴于SVs对康复的积极益处,我们假设SV会减少气管切开拔管的时间。本研究的目的是在部分早产儿慢性肺病(CLD)患者中评估这一点。方法回顾性分析某三级保健儿童医院的临床资料。共发现105例气管切开和CLD患者。收集的数据包括人口统计,胎龄,先天性心脏病,气道手术,肉芽组织切除,SV和封顶试验,支气管炎发作,和诊所访问。采用逻辑回归和线性回归进行统计。结果共纳入75例患者。平均胎龄为27周(标准偏差[SD]=3.6),平均出生体重为1.1kg(SD=0.6)。气管造口术的平均年龄为122天(SD=63)。共有70.7%的患者进行了拔管,平均拔管时间(TTD)为37个月(SD=19)。总共77.3%的患者患有SVs。与没有SV的人相比,有SV的人的TTD更长(52个月对35个月;p=0.008)。气管炎的住院次数每增加一次,拔管增加2个月(p=0.011)。结论本研究是第一个,根据我们的知识,评估使用SVs时显示较长TTD的CLD患者中SVs对气管造口术拔管的影响。
    Introduction  Despite several pediatric tracheostomy decannulation protocols there remains tremendous variability in practice. The effect of tracheostomy capping on decannulation has been studied but the role of speaking valves (SVs) is unknown. Objective  Given the positive benefits SVs have on rehabilitation, we hypothesized that SVs would decrease time to tracheostomy decannulation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this in a subset of patients with chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLD). Methods  A retrospective chart review was performed at a tertiary care children\'s hospital. A total of 105 patients with tracheostomies and CLD were identified. Data collected included demographics, gestational age, congenital cardiac disease, airway surgeries, granulation tissue excisions, SV and capping trials, tracheitis episodes, and clinic visits. Statistics were performed with logistic and linear regression. Results  A total of 75 patients were included. The mean gestational age was 27 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 3.6) and the average birthweight was 1.1 kg (SD = 0.6). The average age at tracheostomy was 122 days (SD = 63). A total of 70.7% of the patients underwent decannulation and the mean time to decannulation (TTD) was 37 months (SD = 19). A total of 77.3% of the patients had SVs. Those with an SV had a longer TTD compared to those without (52 versus 35 months; p  = 0.008). Decannulation was increased by 2 months for every increase in the number of hospital presentations for tracheitis ( p  = 0.011). Conclusion  The present study is the first, to our knowledge, to assess the effect of SVs on tracheostomy decannulation in patients with CLD showing a longer TTD when SVs are used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症卒中机械通气患者的气管造口术可以通过手术或透析方式进行。比较两种方法在中风患者中的前瞻性数据很少。神经重症监护试验2(SETPOINT2)中与中风相关的早期气管造口术和延长气管插管的随机研究将382例机械通气的中风患者分配到早期气管造口术与拔管或标准气管造口术。307例SETPOINT2患者中有41例进行了外科气管切开术(ST),大多数患者接受了扩张气管造口术(DT)。我们旨在比较这些患者的ST和DT。
    方法:将所有SETPOINT2ST患者与接受DT(1:2)的卒中对照组患者进行比较,通过倾向得分匹配选择,包括因素中风类型,SETPOINT2随机化组,卒中早期气管切开评分,患者年龄,和病前功能状态。成功拔管是主要结果,次要结局参数包括6个月时的功能结局和气管造口术引起的不良事件.通过回归分析评估了拔管的潜在预测因素。
    结果:两组接受ST的卒中患者(n=41)和接受DT的卒中患者(n=82)的基线特征相当。ST组的气管造口术明显晚于DT组(中位数9[四分位距{IQR}5-12]与插管后9[IQR4-11]天,p=0.025)。ST患者机械通气时间更长(中位数19[IQR17-24]vs.14[IQR11-19]天,p=0.008),并在重症监护室呆了更长时间(中位数23[IQR16-27]与17[IQR13-24]天,p=0.047),与DT患者相比。与DT组相比,ST组的医院内感染率明显高于DT组(14.6%vs.1.2%,p=0.002)。6个月时,拔管率(56%与61%),功能结果,和死亡率没有什么不同。然而,与DT组相比,ST组进行拔管的时间较晚(中位数81[IQR66-149]与58[IQR32-77]天,p=0.004)。较高的基线卒中早期气管造口术评分负预测拔管。
    结论:在需要气管切开术的重度中风的通气患者中,手术和扩张方法在6个月时与相当的拔管率和功能结局相关.然而,ST与更长的拔管时间和更高的早期感染率相关,支持通气中风患者气管造口术的扩张方法。
    BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients with severe stroke can be performed surgically or dilationally. Prospective data comparing both methods in patients with stroke are scarce. The randomized Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy vs Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial2 (SETPOINT2) assigned 382 mechanically ventilated patients with stroke to early tracheostomy versus extubation or standard tracheostomy. Surgical tracheostomy (ST) was performed in 41 of 307 SETPOINT2 patients, and the majority received dilational tracheostomy (DT). We aimed to compare ST and DT in these patients with patients.
    METHODS: All SETPOINT2 patients with ST were compared with a control group of patients with stroke undergoing DT (1:2), selected by propensity score matching that included the factors stroke type, SETPOINT2 randomization group, Stroke Early Tracheostomy score, patient age, and premorbid functional status. Successful decannulation was the primary outcome, and secondary outcome parameters included functional outcome at 6 months and adverse events attributable to tracheostomy. Potential predictors of decannulation were evaluated by regression analysis.
    RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups of patients with stroke undergoing ST (n = 41) and matched patients with stroke undergoing DT (n = 82). Tracheostomy was performed significantly later in the ST group than in the DT group (median 9 [interquartile range {IQR} 5-12] vs. 9 [IQR 4-11] days after intubation, p = 0.025). Patients with ST were mechanically ventilated longer (median 19 [IQR 17-24] vs.14 [IQR 11-19] days, p = 0.008) and stayed in the intensive care unit longer (median 23 [IQR 16-27] vs. 17 [IQR 13-24] days, p = 0.047), compared with patients with DT. The intrahospital infection rate was significantly higher in the ST group compared to the DT group (14.6% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002). At 6 months, decannulation rates (56% vs. 61%), functional outcomes, and mortality were not different. However, decannulation was performed later in the ST group compared to the DT group (median 81 [IQR 66-149] vs. 58 [IQR 32-77] days, p = 0.004). Higher baseline Stroke Early Tracheostomy score negatively predicted decannulation.
    CONCLUSIONS: In ventilated patients with severe stroke in need of tracheostomy, surgical and dilational methods are associated with comparable decannulation rate and functional outcome at 6 months. However, ST was associated with longer time to decannulation and higher rates of early infections, supporting the dilational approach to tracheostomy in ventilated patients with stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号