DNA extraction Method

DNA 提取方法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    来自油藏的微生物通过诸如生物降解或酸化的过程形成石油组合物。这种方法被认为在经济上是有害的,并且可能造成健康和安全危害。因此,了解水库微生物群落的组成及其代谢能力至关重要。然而,从原油等复杂流体中提取DNA的困难阻碍了这种分析。这里,我们提出了一种新颖的从石油中提取DNA的方法,具有广泛的美国石油学会(API)重力(密度)范围。我们研究了用不同的溶剂和表面活性剂从油中提取细胞的能力,后者是非离子和离子。此外,我们评估了三种DNA提取方法。总的来说,以异辛烷为溶剂可获得最佳的DNA产量和最高的16SrRNA读数,随后使用十二烷基硫酸钠进行离子表面活性剂处理,并使用PowerSodicPro试剂盒(Qiagen)进行DNA提取。然后将最终方法应用于来自在无菌条件下收集的储油器的各种油。尽管预期101-103细胞/ml的低细胞密度,新方法产生了可靠的结果,每个样品的平均16SrRNA测序读数为41431(±8860)。嗜热,嗜盐,和厌氧分类单元,最有可能是油藏的土著,在所有样本中都有发现。API重力和DNA产量,尽管获得了足够的DNA,没有显示出相关性。
    Microbes from oil reservoirs shape petroleum composition through processes such as biodegradation or souring. Such processes are considered economically detrimental and might pose health and safety hazards. It is therefore crucial to understand the composition of a reservoir\'s microbial community and its metabolic capabilities. However, such analyses are hindered by difficulties in extracting DNA from such complex fluids as crude oil. Here, we present a novel DNA extraction method from oils with a wide American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity (density) range. We investigated the ability to extract cells from oils with different solvents and surfactants, the latter both nonionic and ionic. Furthermore, we evaluated three DNA extraction methods. Overall, the best DNA yields and the highest number of 16S rRNA reads were achieved with isooctane as a solvent, followed by an ionic surfactant treatment using sodium dodecyl sulfate and DNA extraction using the PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen). The final method was then applied to various oils from oil reservoirs collected in aseptic conditions. Despite the expected low cell density of 101-103 cells/ml, the new method yielded reliable results, with average 16S rRNA sequencing reads in the order of 41431 (±8860) per sample. Thermophilic, halophilic, and anaerobic taxa, which are most likely to be indigenous to the oil reservoir, were found in all samples. API gravity and DNA yield, despite the sufficient DNA obtained, did not show a correlation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    With the advent of new molecular diagnostic techniques, retrieving DNA from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues has become an essential yet challenging step for efficient downstream processes. Owing to low quality and quantity of DNA retrieved from the FFPE sections, the process is often impractical and needs significant improvements. Here, we established an efficient method for the purification of DNA from FFPE specimens by optimizing incubation temperature, incubation time, and the concentration of a formalin scavenger tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) for reverse-crosslinking. The optimized method, named \"Highly concentrated Tris-mediated DNA extraction\" (HiTE), yielded three times the DNA yield per tissue slice compared with a representative DNA extraction kit. Moreover, the use of HiTE-extracted DNA increased the yield of the sequencing library three times and accordingly yielded a log higher and more reproducible sequencing library compared with that obtained using the commonly used commercial kit. The sequencing library prepared from HiTE-extracted FFPE-DNA had longer inserts and produced reads that evenly covered the reference genome. Successful application of HiTE-extracted FFPE-DNA for whole-genome and targeted gene panel sequencing indicates its practical usability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    DNA提取是任何分子实验的重要步骤。通过通常的裂解方法不能容易地从放线菌成员中提取DNA。由于传统的DNA提取方法效率低,在紧急情况下,开发一种有效的放线菌DNA提取技术似乎是必要的。由于大多数DNA提取技术和商业试剂盒不足以从放线菌中提取DNA,进行这项研究是为了改进从常规细菌中提取DNA的有效方法。
    使用五种方法进行DNA提取(一种改进的方法,Invisorb旋转植物迷你套件,EZ-10旋转柱,Sarrbrucken方法(HZI,德国)和柯比·鲍尔的方法)。为了评估提取的基因组DNA的数量和质量,评估所有样品的UV吸光度和聚合酶链反应(PCR)的效率。
    总的来说,结果表明,使用引入的DNA提取方法可以获得最高的DNA数量(高达4000ng/μl)和良好的质量。
    结果表明,最近引入的改进方法对于从放线菌中提取DNA进行DDH(DNA-DNA杂交)测试以及需要高浓度DNA的方法更有效。
    UNASSIGNED: DNA extraction is an important step of any molecular experiment. DNA could not be easily extracted from members of actinomycetes by the usual methods of lysis. Due to the low efficiency of the conventional DNA extraction methods, development of an effective technique for DNA extraction of actinobacteria in emergency cases seems to be necessary. Since most of the DNA extraction techniques and commercial kits are not efficient enough to extract DNA from actinobacteria, this study was conducted to improve an efficient method obtained from conventional one to extract DNA from this group of bacteria.
    UNASSIGNED: DNA extraction was performed using five methods (an improved method, Invisorb Spin Plant Mini Kit, EZ-10 Spin Column, Sarrbrucken method (HZI, Germany) and Kirby Bauer\'s method). To evaluate the quantity and quality of extracted genomic DNA, UV absorbance of all samples and efficiency of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the results revealed that the highest quantity (up to 4000 ng/μl) and good quality of DNA was obtained using introduced DNA extraction method.
    UNASSIGNED: Results indicated that recently introduced improved method was more efficient for extraction of DNA from actinobacteria for DDH (DNA-DNA hybridization) test and for those require the high concentration of DNA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Liquid biopsy is gaining increasing popularity in cancer screening and diagnosis. However, there is no relatively mature DNA isolation method or commercial kit available that is compatible with different LB sample types. This study developed a PAN-sample DNA isolation method (PAN method) for liquid biopsy samples.
    METHODS: The PAN method has two key steps, including biosample-specific pretreatments for various LB sample types and high concentration guanidine thiocyanate buffer for lysis and denaturation procedure. Subsequently, the performance of PAN method was validated by a series of molecular analyses.
    RESULTS: The PAN method was used to isolate DNA from multiple sample types related to LB, including plasma, serum, saliva, nasopharyngeal swab, and stool. All purified DNA products showed good quality and high quantity. Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis using DNA purified using PAN method versus QIAamp methods showed similar efficiency. Epstein-Barr virus DNA was detected via Q-PCR using DNA purified from serum, plasma, nasopharyngeal swab, and saliva samples collected from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Similarly, methylation sequencing of swab and saliva samples revealed good coverage of target region and high methylation of HLA-DPB1 gene. Finally, 16S rDNA gene sequencing of saliva, swab, and stool samples successfully defines the relative abundance of microbial communities.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and validated a PAN-sample DNA isolation method that can be used for different LB samples, which can be applied to molecular epidemiological research and other areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    DNA studies of endangered or extinct species often rely on ancient or degraded remains. The majority of ancient DNA (aDNA) extraction protocols focus on skeletal elements, with skin and hair samples rarely explored. Similar to that found in bones and teeth, DNA extracted from historical or ancient skin and fur samples is also extremely fragmented with low endogenous content due to natural degradation processes. Thus, the development of effective DNA extraction methods is required for these materials. Here, we compared the performance of two DNA extraction protocols (commercial and custom laboratory aDNA methods) on hair and skin samples from decades-old museum specimens to Iron Age archaeological material. We found that apart from the impact sample-specific taphonomic and handling history has on the quantity and quality of DNA preservation, skin yielded more endogenous DNA than hair of the samples and protocols tested. While both methods recovered DNA from ancient soft tissue, the laboratory method performed better overall in terms of DNA yield and quality, which was primarily due to the poorer performance of the commercial binding buffer in recovering aDNA.
    濒危或已灭绝动物的DNA研究通常依据古代或已严重降解的标本遗存。比较成熟的古DNA(ancient DNA,aDNA)提取方法主要针对于骨骼样本,对于皮张和毛发的研究较为少见。与古代的骨骼和牙齿情况相似,陈旧皮张样品中的DNA也由于自然降解等情况的存在,使得获取到的DNA片段长度极短、内源DNA含量极低。因此,针对这些样品,需要开发有效的DNA提取方法。本研究以几十年前到铁器时代的动物皮张和毛发样品为材料,比较2种提取方法(试剂盒法和古DNA实验室法)及相互组合的2种方法的DNA提取效果。研究发现除样品本身的差别(如年代等),皮张样品比毛发样品保留更多的内源DNA。所有方法都能够从陈旧的皮张样品中获取内源DNA,但是实验室的方法在DNA产量和质量上整体优于其它方法,实验室方法在纯化上的表现优于试剂盒方法。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Although protocols exist for the recovery of ancient DNA from land snail and marine bivalve shells, marine conch shells have yet to be studied from a paleogenomic perspective. We first present reference assemblies for both a 623.7 Mbp nuclear genome and a 15.4 kbp mitochondrial genome for Strombus pugilis, the West Indian fighting conch. We next detail a method to extract and sequence DNA from conch shells and apply it to conch from Bocas del Toro, Panama across three time periods: recently-eaten and discarded (n = 3), Late Holocene (984-1258 before present [BP]) archaeological midden (n = 5), and mid-Holocene (5711-7187 BP) paleontological fossil coral reef (n = 5). These results are compared to control DNA extracted from live-caught tissue and fresh shells (n = 5). Using high-throughput sequencing, we were able to obtain S. pugilis nuclear sequence reads from shells across all age periods: up to 92.5 thousand filtered reads per sample in live-caught shell material, 4.57 thousand for modern discarded shells, 12.1 thousand reads for archaeological shells, and 114 reads in paleontological shells. We confirmed authenticity of the ancient DNA recovered from the archaeological and paleontological shells based on 5.7× higher average frequency of deamination-driven misincorporations and 15% shorter average read lengths compared to the modern shells. Reads also mapped to the S. pugilis mitochondrial genome for all but the paleontological shells, with consistent ratios of mitochondrial to nuclear mapped reads across sample types. Our methods can be applied to diverse archaeological sites to facilitate reconstructions of the long-term impacts of human behaviour on mollusc evolutionary biology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海洋生物对全球粮食安全至关重要,因为它们是喂养人类的动物蛋白的最大来源。基因组学辅助水产养殖可以在保护环境的同时提高产量,以确保全球粮食安全的充足和可持续生产。然而,只有少数高质量的海洋生物基因组序列,尤其是贝类,部分原因是由于基因组的复杂性质导致序列组装困难。成功的基因组测序的关键步骤是制备高质量的高分子量(HMW)基因组DNA。本研究评估了五种DNA提取方案(CTAB,基因组尖端,软体动物的DNA,TIANAMP海洋动物DNA,和Sbeadex家畜试剂盒)在长读测序平台上获得虾HMWDNA。使用Qubit荧光计评估DNA样品的质量和数量,NanoDrop分光光度计和脉冲场凝胶电泳。在未经进一步优化的五种提取方法中,基因组尖端试剂盒产生了最高质量的基因组DNA。然而,对这些已建立的方案进行进一步修改可能会产生更好的DNA质量和数量。为了进一步研究获得的基因组DNA是否可用于长读测序应用,DNA样本的前三种提取方法(CTAB法,基因组尖端和MolluscDNA试剂盒)用于太平洋生物科学(PacBio)文库构建和测序。从Genomic-tip和MolluscDNA试剂盒获得的基因组DNA允许成功的文库构建,而从CTAB方法获得的DNA没有。使用基因组尖端试剂盒分离的基因组DNA产生的长读数(N50为14.57Kb)高于从MolluscDNA试剂盒获得的长读数(N50为9.74Kb)。因此,这项研究确定了一种有效的提取方法,可用于长读测序平台的虾的高质量HMW基因组DNA,可应用于其他海洋生物。
    Marine organisms are important to global food security as they are the largest source of animal proteins feeding mankind. Genomics-assisted aquaculture can increase yield while preserving the environment to ensure sufficient and sustainable production for global food security. However, only few high-quality genome sequences of marine organisms, especially shellfish, are available to the public partly because of the difficulty in the sequence assembly due to the complex nature of their genomes. A key step for a successful genome sequencing is the preparation of high-quality high molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA. This study evaluated the effectiveness of five DNA extraction protocols (CTAB, Genomic-tip, Mollusc DNA, TIANamp Marine Animals DNA, and Sbeadex livestock kits) in obtaining shrimp HMW DNA for a long-read sequencing platform. DNA samples were assessed for quality and quantity using a Qubit fluorometer, NanoDrop spectrophotometer and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Among the five extraction methods examined without further optimization, the Genomic-tip kit yielded genomic DNA with the highest quality. However, further modifications of these established protocols might yield even better DNA quality and quantity. To further investigate whether the obtained genomic DNA could be used in a long-read sequencing application, DNA samples from the top three extraction methods (CTAB method, Genomic-tip and Mollusc DNA kits) were used for Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) library construction and sequencing. Genomic DNA obtained from Genomic-tip and Mollusc DNA kits allowed successful library construction, while the DNA obtained from the CTAB method did not. Genomic DNA isolated using the Genomic-tip kit yielded a higher number of long reads (N50 of 14.57 Kb) than those obtained from Mollusc DNA kits (N50 of 9.74 Kb). Thus, this study identified an effective extraction method for high-quality HMW genomic DNA of shrimp that can be applied to other marine organisms for a long-read sequencing platform.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In this study, strain Streptomyces sp. Act4Zk was isolated based on a method developed for the isolation of myxobacteria. Due to the low efficiency of the majority of conventional DNA extraction techniques, for molecular identification of the strain Streptomyces sp. Act4Zk, a new technique for DNA extraction of Actinobacteria was developed. In order to explore potential bioactivities of the strain, extracts of the fermented broth culture were prepared by an organic solvent (i.e. ethyl acetate) extraction method using. These ethyl acetate extracts were subjected to HPLC fractionation against standard micro-organisms, followed by LC/MS analysis. Based on morphological, physiological, biochemical and 16S rRNA gene sequence data, strain Streptomyces sp. Act4Zk is likely to be a new species of Streptomyces, close to Streptomyces genecies and Streptomyces roseolilacinus. Antimicrobial assay indicated high antifungal activity as well as antibacterial activity against Mycobacterium smegmatis and Gram-positive bacteria for the new strain. HPLC and LC/MS analyses of the extracts led to the identification of three different compounds and confirmed our hypothesis that the interesting species of the genus Streptomyces being a good producer of staurosporine and some derivatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宿主微生物组和建筑环境的微生物组都会对人类健康产生深远的影响。虽然先前的研究表明,DNA提取方法引入的变异性小于典型的生物变异,大多数研究集中在16SrRNA扩增子测序或高生物量粪便样品上。Shotgun宏基因组测序提供了超过扩增子测序的优势,用于调查微生物组,但是在具有高人类DNA含量的较低微生物生物量样品中执行是一个挑战,例如痰或真空粉尘。在这里,我们系统地评估了四种不同提取方法的影响(苯酚:胆碱,和三种基于试剂盒的高通量方法,PromegaMaxwellgDNA,QiagenMagAttractPowerSoilDNA,和ZymoBIOMICS96磁珠)。我们报告了人类粪便中通过shot弹枪宏基因组学测序评估的微生物群落结构和预测的微生物功能的变化,痰,和从正在进行的队列研究或临床试验中获得的真空粉尘。对所有样品使用相同的beadbeating方案,以将我们的评估集中在试剂盒化学对测序结果的影响上。在苯酚:choroform和Promega方法中,DNA产量总体最高。只有苯酚:胆碱方法在阴性对照中显示出污染的证据。使用模拟社区对照评估偏差,在所有提取方法中都有记录,虽然Promega表现出最小的偏差。提取方法不影响人类阅读的比例,尽管与灰尘(44.1%)和痰(80%)相比,粪便的人类读数比例最低(0.1%)。我们计算了Bray-Curtis差异和Aitchison距离,以评估提取方法对样品类型微生物群落结构的影响。提取方法对粪便的影响最低(提取方法占变异性的3.0-3.9%),对吸尘的影响最大(变异性的12-16%)和痰液的中间值(变异性的9.2-12%)。在评估微生物群落功能时注意到类似的差异。我们的结果将为在大型临床研究中使用不同样本类型计划微生物组研究的研究人员提供信息。建议在所有样品类型中采用一致的DNA提取方法,特别是受提取方法影响较大的微生物生物量较低的样品。
    Both the host microbiome and the microbiome of the built environment can have profound impacts on human health. While prior studies have suggested that the variability introduced by DNA extraction method is less than typical biologic variation, most studies have focused on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing or on high biomass fecal samples. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing provides advantages over amplicon sequencing for surveying the microbiome, but is a challenge to perform in lower microbial biomass samples with high human DNA content such as sputum or vacuumed dust. Here we systematically evaluate the impact of four different extraction methods (phenol:choloroform, and three high-throughput kit-based approaches, the Promega Maxwell gDNA, Qiagen MagAttract PowerSoil DNA, and ZymoBIOMICS 96 MagBead). We report the variation in microbial community structure and predicted microbial function assessed by shotgun metagenomics sequencing in human stool, sputum, and vacuumed dust obtained from ongoing cohort studies or clinical trials. The same beadbeating protocol was used for all samples to focus our evaluation on the impact of kit chemistries on sequencing results. DNA yield was overall highest in the phenol:choloroform and Promega approaches. Only the phenol:choloroform approach showed evidence of contamination in negative controls. Bias was evaluated using mock community controls, and was noted across all extraction methods, although Promega exhibited the least amount of bias. The extraction method did not impact the proportion of human reads, although stool had the lowest proportion of human reads (0.1%) as compared to dust (44.1%) and sputum (80%). We calculated Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and Aitchison distances to evaluate the impact of extraction method on microbial community structure by sample type. Extraction method had the lowest impact in stool (extraction method responsible for 3.0-3.9% of the variability), the most impact in vacuumed dust (12-16% of the variability) and intermediate values for sputum (9.2-12% variability). Similar differences were noted when evaluating microbial community function. Our results will inform investigators planning microbiome studies using diverse sample types in large clinical studies. A consistent DNA extraction approach across all sample types is recommended, particularly with lower microbial biomass samples that are more heavily influenced by extraction method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The skin microbiota is characterized by high intra- and inter-variability among individuals, due to a multitude of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters such as genetics, lifestyles or pollution. This variability may be heightened due to sampling method as the skin is a multilayer organ and its outermost layer consists of dead cells. In order to investigate this biological variability in a reproducible way, we studied how sampling procedure and DNA extraction methods influence the qualitative and quantitative gathering of bacterial communities. Here, we tested a new sampling procedure that consists in exerting a slight abrasion (scrubbing) on the skin prior to swabbing and extracting DNA in order to remove squames and access deeper ecological niches. Scrubbed and non-scrubbed samples were collected from a panel of six volunteers, and four DNA extraction methods were performed on the samples. The abundance, diversity and structure of the bacterial communities were measured using qPCR technics and 16S rDNA gene-metabarcoding. Bacterial community abundance was significantly impacted by the DNA extraction method (in favor of a method designed for tissues) but not by sampling procedure, as scrubbing does not increase bacterial biomass gathered. Bacterial α- and β-diversities were both affected by DNA extraction methods and sampling procedure. Scrubbing reveals different microbial composition by gathering bacteria living in deeper skin layer, resulting in a lower intra-personal variability. The taxonomic analysis showed that more bacteria belonging to anaerobes groups were present in scrubbed samples. We conclude that DNA extraction methods designed for tissue are not necessarily associated with high qualitative efficiency and slight scrubbing prior DNA extraction reduces intrapersonal variability and give access to a new microbial diversity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号