DKA

DKA
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂已证明在减缓慢性肾脏病(CKD)的进展中有效。管理充血性心力衰竭(CHF)等疾病,降低2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的心血管疾病和总死亡率。然而,它们的使用与并发症有关,包括正常血糖的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(euDKA),生殖器真菌感染,尿路感染(UTI)。虽然罕见,如果不及时解决,像euDKA这样的并发症会导致严重的后果,一例90岁的缺血性心肌病和2型糖尿病患者在接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗时同时出现了euDKA和UTI。从SGLT2抑制剂的使用中早期发现euDKA促使停止SGLT2抑制剂和胰岛素输注,最终解决危及生命的问题.
    Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in slowing the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), managing conditions such as congestive heart failure (CHF), and reducing cardiovascular and overall mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their use is associated with complications, including euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA), genital fungal infections, and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Although rare, complications like euDKA can lead to serious consequences if not promptly addressed, as illustrated by this case report of a 90-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy and type 2 diabetes who developed both euDKA and a UTI while on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. Early identification of euDKA from SGLT2 inhibitor usage prompted cessation of the SGLT2 inhibitor and administration of insulin infusion, ultimately resolving the life-threatening condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT2)抑制剂被过滤并分泌到其在肾脏近端小管中的主要作用部位。在这个网站,SGLT2抑制剂还可以减少酮体的肾脏消除,这一发现与他们引起酮症酸中毒的倾向有关。许多常用的药物具有减少SGLT2抑制剂的肾消除和通过抑制SGLT2抑制剂本身和/或酮体的肾小管分泌来复合SGLT2抑制剂对酮体的肾消除的作用的潜力。我们介绍了一例2型糖尿病患者的严重糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)病例,发生在依帕列净和丙磺舒共同处方后几天。除了最近推出的empagliflozin,没有明显的DKA发作的原因。丙磺舒和依帕列净之间的药代动力学相互作用,涉及有机阴离子转运蛋白3(OAT3),减少了依帕列净的近端肾小管分泌,并增加了患者对药物的暴露。讨论了这种现象是否足以引起严重的DKA。提出了关于DKA病因的另一种解释,其中丙磺舒可能是依帕列净对肾脏酮体消除的复合作用。我们建议临床医生在处方SGLT2抑制剂和药物抑制剂时要谨慎,或竞争对手,由于严重DKA的风险,糖尿病患者的近端肾小管有机阴离子转运蛋白。
    Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are filtered and secreted to their primary site of action in the proximal tubule of the kidney. At this site, SGLT2 inhibitors also reduce renal elimination of ketone bodies, a finding implicated in their propensity to cause ketoacidosis. Many commonly used medications have potential to diminish renal elimination of SGLT2 inhibitors and to compound the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on renal elimination of ketone bodies by inhibiting tubular secretion of the SGLT2 inhibitor itself and/or ketone bodies. We present a case of severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in a patient with type 2 diabetes occurring several days after co-prescription of empagliflozin and probenecid. Other than the recent introduction of empagliflozin, no cause for the DKA episode was apparent. A pharmacokinetic interaction between probenecid and empagliflozin, involving organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3), reduces proximal tubular secretion of empagliflozin and increases patient exposure to the drug. Whether or not this phenomenon is sufficient to cause severe DKA is discussed. An alternative explanation as to the DKA aetiology is proposed, wherein probenecid may compound effects of empagliflozin on renal elimination of ketone bodies. We suggest that clinicians exercise caution when prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors alongside pharmacologic inhibitors of, or competitors for, proximal tubular organic anion transporters in patients with diabetes mellitus due to the risk of severe DKA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急性食管坏死(AEN),也被称为Gurvits综合征,是一种罕见且可能危及生命的疾病,其特征是食管粘膜坏死。急性食管坏死通常与危急情况有关,比如心肌梗塞,糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA),2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染,或手术后并发症。患者通常表现为恶心,呕血,急性吞咽困难,还有Melena.鉴于其高死亡率,通过上内窥镜检查迅速检测和早期开始治疗是至关重要的。大多数Gurvits综合征病例采用静脉输液保守治疗,质子泵抑制剂,和抗生素。在这里,我们在DKA的设定中提出了一系列AEN的病例。两名患者均接受了支持性护理,并在稳定的情况下出院。
    Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN), also known as Gurvits syndrome, is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by necrosis of the esophageal mucosa. Acute esophageal necrosis is often associated with critical conditions, such as myocardial infarction, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, or post-surgical complications. Patients typically present with nausea, hematemesis, acute dysphagia, and melena. Given its high mortality rate, prompt detection with upper endoscopy and early initiation of treatment are crucial. Most cases of Gurvits syndrome are managed conservatively using intravenous fluids, proton pump inhibitors, and antibiotics. Herein, we present a case series of AEN in the setting of DKA. Both patients received supportive care and were discharged in a stable condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着基于证据的协议和资源的可用性,DKA的预后随着时间的推移而有所改善。然而,在肯尼亚,DKA的适当诊断和管理资源有限,主要限于三级转诊设施。本研究旨在回顾临床表现,管理,和接受DKA的成年患者的结局,并评估COVID-19大流行之前和期间这些参数的差异。
    方法:这是一项2017年1月至2021年12月DKA入院的回顾性研究。使用ICD-10代码从病历部门检索患者数据,并在临床表现上提取个人细节,管理,以及DKA的结果。在COVID-19之前和COVID-19持续时间之间进行了比较。
    结果:纳入了150例DKA患者(n=48,COVID-19之前,n=102(n=23COVID-19阳性,n=79COVID-19阴性))。中位年龄为47岁(IQR33.0,59.0),HbA1C中位数为12.4%[IQR10.8,14.6]),大多数患者有严重的DKA(46%)。最常见的DKA沉淀剂是感染(40.7%),新诊断的糖尿病(33.3%)和错过药物治疗(25.3%)。作为DKA沉淀剂,肺部感染有显著差异,在COVID-19大流行前和COVID-19大流行期间(COVID-19期间为21.6%,COVID-19之前为6.3%;p=0.012)。使用的总胰岛素剂量中位数为110.0单位[IQR76.0,173.0],100%的患者接受了基础胰岛素。住院时间中位数为4.0天[IQR3.0,6.0],DKA消退时间为30.0h[IQR24.0,48.0]。有2人死亡(1.3%),没有直接归因于DKA。在前COVID-19,COVID-19阳性和COVID-19阴性DKA之间,DKA的严重程度显着不同(COVID-19阳性的52.2%具有中度DKA,而COVID-19阴性的26.6%和前COVID-19的22.9%(p=0.006))。
    结论:即使在发展中地区,使用适当的DKA管理设施可以取得良好的结果。临床医生和患者教育是必要的,以确保早期发现和及时转诊,以避免患者出现严重的DKA。需要进行探索性研究,以评估本研究中发现的DKA消退时间延长的原因。
    BACKGROUND: Prognosis of DKA has improved over time with the availability of evidence-based protocols and resources. However, in Kenya, there are limited resources for the appropriate diagnosis and management of DKA, mostly limited to tertiary-level referral facilities. This study aimed to review the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of adult patients admitted with DKA and assess differences in these parameters before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study of DKA admissions from January 2017 to December 2021. Patient data were retrieved from the medical records department using ICD-10 codes, and individual details were abstracted on clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of DKA. Comparisons were made between pre-COVID-19 and during COVID-19 durations.
    RESULTS: 150 patients admitted with DKA were included (n = 48 pre- COVID-19, n = 102 during COVID-19 (n = 23 COVID-19 positive, n = 79 COVID-19 negative)). Median age was 47 years (IQR 33.0, 59.0), median HbA1C was 12.4% [IQR 10.8, 14.6]), and most patients had severe DKA (46%). Most common DKA precipitants were infections (40.7%), newly diagnosed diabetes (33.3%) and missed medication (25.3%). There was a significant difference in pulmonary infections as a DKA precipitant, between the pre- COVID and during COVID-19 pandemic (21.6% during COVID-19 versus 6.3% pre- COVID-19; p = 0.012). Median total insulin dose used was 110.0 units [IQR 76.0, 173.0], and a 100% of patients received basal insulin. Median length of hospital stay was 4.0 days [IQR 3.0, 6.0] and time to DKA resolution was 30.0 h [IQR 24.0, 48.0]. There were 2 deaths (1.3%), none directly attributable to DKA. Severity of DKA significantly differed between pre- COVID-19, COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative DKA (52.2% of COVID-19 positive had moderate DKA compared to 26.6% of COVID-19 negative and 22.9% of Pre-COVID-19 (p = 0.006)).
    CONCLUSIONS: Even in developing regions, good outcomes can be achieved with the appropriate facilities for DKA management. Clinician and patient education is necessary to ensure early detection and prompt referral to avoid patients presenting with severe DKA. Exploratory studies are needed to assess reasons for prolonged time to DKA resolution found in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项回顾性研究旨在使用混合(定性和定量)方法来评估FSL在减少因各种原因而住院方面的作用,HbA1c,并报告了生活在英格兰西北部社会匮乏地区的糖尿病患者的低血糖事件。
    数据是从以前的咨询中回顾性收集的,恰逢第六周,第6个月和年度审查,包括血液检查,因任何原因入院并报告低血糖。此外,进行FSL评估和满意度半结构化问卷,以评估FSL对糖尿病管理和生活质量的影响。混合效应模型用于评估血糖控制和住院人数减少以及报告的低血糖发作。
    只有127名患者符合纳入标准。纵向分析HbA1c数据的多元线性混合模型方法揭示了基线和FSL后测量之间的平均差(mmol/mol),通过约束最大似然法(REML)估计为9.64(六周),7.68(6个月)和7.58(年度审查);所有相应的p值<0.0001。对于DKA患者,Bootstrap方法显示平均HbA1c显著降低,为25.5,95%置信区间(CI)[8.8,42.6]mmol/mol.事实证明,使用FSL一年可使住院人数减少59%,报告的低血糖发作减少46%。
    使用FSL导致住院人数在统计学上显着减少,HbA1c和报告的糖尿病患者在英格兰西北部社会贫困地区的低血糖发作。这些结果显示与较高的问卷得分直接相关。
    在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s40200-024-01424-4获得。
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study aimed to use mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods to evaluate the role of FSL in reducing hospital admissions due to all causes, HbA1c, and reported hypoglycaemic episodes in people with diabetes living in a socially deprived region of Northwest England.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected retrospectively from previous consultations, which coincided with the 6th -week, 6th -month and annual review including blood tests, hospital admissions due to any cause and reported hypoglycaemia. Also, FSL assessment and satisfaction semi-structured questionnaire was done to assess the impact of FSL on diabetes management and quality of life. Mixed-effects models were used to assess glycaemic control and reductions in hospital admissions and reported hypoglycaemic episodes.
    UNASSIGNED: Just 127 patients met the inclusion criteria. A multivariate linear mixed model method that analyses HbA1c data longitudinally revealed mean differences (mmol/mol) between baseline and post-FSL measurements, estimated by restricted maximum likelihood method (REML) of 9.64 (six weeks), 7.68 (six months) and 7.58 (annual review); all with a corresponding p-value of < 0.0001. For DKA patients, the bootstrap method revealed a significant reduction in mean HbA1c of 25.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) [8.8, 42.6] mmol/mol. It is demonstrated that FSL use for one year resulted in 59% reduction in hospital admissions and 46% reduction in reported hypoglycaemic episodes.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of FSL resulted in statistically significant reductions in hospital admissions, HbA1c and reported hypoglycaemic episodes among diabetics in a socially deprived Northwest region of England. These outcomes show a direct association with a higher questionnaire score.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01424-4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)是一种威胁生命的糖尿病(DM)并发症。它是由于胰岛素水平降低和血液中葡萄糖水平升高而发生的,这使得细胞无法使用葡萄糖作为能量来源,并开始将脂肪分解成酮;血液中酮水平的过载会导致DKA。该研究的目的是评估麦加市糖尿病患者及其护理人员对DKA的认识,沙特阿拉伯。
    方法:本研究是一项横断面研究,通过对麦加市糖尿病患者及其护理人员的在线问卷调查收集。通过使用Google表格以阿拉伯语和英语设计的自我报告问卷,它通过社交媒体以电子方式分发给目标人群,以达到调查的目的。
    结果:共包括400名参与者,其中73%是男性,27%是女性。9%的参与者被诊断为DKA。32.5%的参与者对DKA有很高的认识,而67.5%的人知晓率较差。与对DKA的高认识水平相关的因素是年轻,单身,学生和以前的DKA诊断。
    结论:关于我们对DKA认识不足的参与者,对糖尿病患者及其护理人员进行DKA的进一步教育对于预防危及生命的并发症至关重要,改善这些患者的生活质量。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). It occurs due to a decrease in the level of insulin and an increase in the level of glucose in the blood, which makes cells unable to use glucose as an energy source and begin to break fat into ketones; an overload of ketones levels in the blood can lead to DKA. The aim of the study is to assess awareness of DKA among diabetic patients and their caregivers in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia.
    METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study collected through an online questionnaire of diabetic patients and their caregivers in Makkah City. A self-reported questionnaire designed in Arabic and English through the use of Google Forms, it distributed electronically via social media to the target population with the objectives of the survey.
    RESULTS: A total of 400 participants were included, 73% of them were males, while 27% were females. A 9% of the participants have been diagnosed with DKA. A high awareness level about DKA was found in 32.5% of participants, while 67.5% had a poor awareness level. Factors associated with a high level of awareness towards DKA are young age, being single, students and having a previous DKA diagnosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regarding our participants who have poor awareness of DKA, further education for diabetic patients and their caregivers about DKA is crucial to prevent life-threatening complications, and improve quality of life for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统评价旨在巩固目前临床试验的结果,比较胰岛素输注在0.05IU/kg/h与0.1IU/kg/h治疗小儿糖尿病酮症酸中毒的有效性。方法:我们搜索了几个数据库,包括PubMed,Embase,Scopus,CochraneCentral和WebofScience。我们的主要结果是达到血糖≤250mg/dl的时间和酸中毒消退的时间。次要结果包括每小时血糖下降率,低血糖的发生率,低钾血症,治疗失败,和脑水肿。结果与结论:本研究表明,低胰岛素剂量对治疗患有糖尿病酮症酸中毒的儿科患者具有与标准剂量相当的疗效。并发症发生率较低。
    当患有1型糖尿病(T1DM)的孩子面临称为糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的严重并发症时,它变成了危及生命的情况。这个条件,负责重大死亡率,涉及高血糖,酮积累和酸度。我们的研究探讨了DKA治疗的一个关键方面-找到正确的胰岛素剂量。通过汇集关于这一点的研究,我们发现,使用较低的胰岛素剂量与标准剂量一样有效地管理儿童的DKA,并发症少。这种洞察力对于改善处理这种具有挑战性的疾病的年轻患者的护理和结果至关重要。
    Aim: This systematic review aims to consolidate findings from current clinical trials that compare the effectiveness of insulin infusion at 0.05 IU/kg/h versus 0.1 IU/kg/h in managing pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis. Methods: We searched several databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central and Web of Science. Our primary outcomes were time to reach blood glucose ≤250 mg/dl and time to resolution of acidosis. Secondary outcomes included rate of blood glucose decrease per hour, incidence of hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, treatment failure, and cerebral edema. Results & conclusion: The present study establishes that a low insulin dose exhibits comparable efficacy to the standard dosage for managing pediatric patients suffering from diabetic ketoacidosis, with a lower incidence of complications.
    When kids with type 1 Diabetes (T1DM) face a serious complication called Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA), it becomes a life-threatening situation. This condition, responsible for significant mortality, involves high blood sugar, ketone buildup and acidity. Our study delves into a critical aspect of DKA treatment-finding the right insulin dose. By pooling the studies on this point, we discovered that using a lower insulin dose is just as effective as the standard dose in managing DKA in children, with fewer complications. This insight is crucial for improving the care and outcomes for young patients dealing with this challenging condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)cemiplimab是一种人单克隆抗体,用于治疗不适合手术或放射治疗的局部晚期和转移性皮肤鳞状细胞癌(CSCC)。尽管cemiplimab显示出优异的疗效和良好的耐受性,会引起副作用,包括可能危及生命的内分泌疾病.我们讨论了一名77岁的白人女性CSCC患者,仅接受了三个周期的cemiplimab治疗,其精神状态改变并被发现患有严重的高血糖症,高渗透压,酮症,糖尿,和酮尿症有关高渗性高血糖综合征(HHS)并发糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)。患者在出院后停止接受HHS/DKA和cemiplimab的标准治疗后,在医院迅速康复。虽然有报道称cemiplimab诱导的DKA,根据我们的知识,这是首例cemiplimab诱导的HHS-DKA病例.本报告旨在阐明cemiplimab诱导的HHS-DKA,并强调需要阐明ICI诱导的糖尿病(ICI-DM)的分子机制。
    The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cemiplimab is a human monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) not amenable to surgery or radiation therapy. Although cemiplimab shows excellent efficacy with a good tolerability profile, it can cause side effects, including potentially life-threatening endocrinopathies. We discuss the case of a 77-year-old Caucasian female with CSCC treated with only three cycles of cemiplimab who presented with altered mental status and was found to have severe hyperglycemia, hyperosmolarity, ketonemia, glucosuria, and ketonuria concerning for hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS) with concurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). The patient made a rapid recovery in the hospital while on standard therapies for HHS/DKA and cemiplimab was discontinued upon discharge. While there have been reports of cemiplimab-induced DKA, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case of cemiplimab-induced HHS-DKA. This report aims to shed light on cemiplimab-induced HHS-DKA and to underscore the need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying ICI-induced diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗是少数获得紧急授权以抗击致命大流行的疫苗之一。尽管一些现有文献讨论了它的短期副作用,其对1型糖尿病(T1DM)的影响仍然存在局限性。
    本研究的目的是评估T1DM患者中COVID-19疫苗接种与糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)之间的关系。此外,这项研究旨在确定疫苗对血糖控制的影响,可变性,和低血糖的风险。
    这项回顾性研究是在卡西姆地区的法哈德国王专科医院(KFSH)进行的,沙特阿拉伯。在2020年2月和2022年8月期间入院的糖尿病酮症酸中毒病例根据具体的纳入标准纳入研究。最后,共有49例患者被纳入统计分析.
    在住院的62名患者中,49符合DKA的诊断标准,并同意参与研究。其余大多数患者(n=13)拒绝参加,只有少数人缺乏完整的文档。在纳入研究的49名患者中,46例有T1DM病史;尽管如此,3例新诊断为T1DM。此外,在这些参与者中,16(32.7%),19(38.8%),14例(28.6%)患者有轻度,中度,和严重的DKA,分别。其中男性27例(55.1%),女性22例(44.9%)。约91%的患者接种了COVID-19疫苗,其中30.6%的患者在被诊断为DKA后29天内接种了疫苗。在接种疫苗29天内被诊断为DKA的患者中,观察到pH和碳酸氢盐水平明显较高,p值分别为0.031和0.037。同样,观察到接种疫苗的患者的pH和随机血糖(RBS)明显高于未接种疫苗的受试者(分别为P=0.044和P=0.032)。
    研究结果表明,一些DKA指标在接种疫苗的患者中很明显。然而,我们建议进行更大规模和多中心的研究,以获得更确凿的证据并推广研究结果.
    UNASSIGNED: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is one of the few vaccines that obtained emergency authorization to combat the fatal pandemic. Despite the fact that some available literature addressed its short-term side effects, there are still limitations on its effects on type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the present study was to assess the association between COVID-19 vaccination and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) among individuals with T1DM. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the effects of the vaccine on glucose control, variability, and risk of hypoglycemia.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital (KFSH) in Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia. Diabetic ketoacidosis cases admitted to the hospital within February 2020 and August 2022 were included in the study based on specific inclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 49 patients were included in statistical analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of the 62 patients admitted to the hospital, 49 met the diagnostic criteria for DKA and agreed to participate in the study. The majority of the remaining patients (n = 13) refused to participate, and only a few of them lacked complete documentation. Of the 49 patients who were included in the study, 46 cases had a history of T1DM; nevertheless, 3 patients were newly diagnosed with T1DM. Additionally, among these participants, 16 (32.7%), 19 (38.8%), and 14 (28.6%) patients had mild, moderate, and severe DKA, respectively. There were 27 male (55.1%) and 22 female (44.9%) patients. About 91% of the patients were vaccinated against COVID-19, 30.6% of whom were vaccinated within 29 days of being diagnosed with DKA. The pH and bicarbonate levels were observed to be significantly high among those who were diagnosed with DKA within 29 days of vaccination, with p-values of 0.031 and 0.037, respectively. Similarly, pH and random blood sugar (RBS) were observed to be significantly higher among the vaccinated patients than in the non-vaccinated subjects (P = 0.044 and P = 0.032, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: The study findings revealed that some of the DKA indicators were evident among the vaccinated patients. However, larger-scale and multi-center studies are recommended in order to have more conclusive evidence and generalize the findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染通常会损害呼吸系统,但也可能损害内分泌器官的功能。甲状腺功能异常和高血糖是SARS-CoV-2感染常见的内分泌并发症。1型糖尿病(T1D)和相关并发症的发作,包括糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA),住院治疗,和死亡,被认为在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间有所增加。这项研究的目的是回顾自COVID-19大流行以来T1D发病率和伴随并发症的现有数据。
    使用电子数据库PubMed和GoogleScholar进行了文献综述。关键字\"T1D,T1DM,1型糖尿病或1型糖尿病\“,“冠状病毒,SARS-CoV-2或COVID-19“被用来搜索这些数据库。标题和摘要经过筛选选择,并对相关研究进行了综述。
    在304项确定的研究中,总共选择了25份手稿。有15项(60%)多中心或全国性研究。关于T1D发病率的数据,住院治疗,和死亡在各国之间并不一致;然而,在COVID-19大流行期间,DKA的发病率和严重程度似乎更高。本研究的数据收集表明,COVID-19可能会或可能不会增加T1D的发病率。然而,它与T1D患者DKA的发生率和严重程度相关。这一发现可能表明抗病毒药物对SARS-CoV-2感染的内分泌并发症没有完全的保护作用。这促进了替代方法的应用。
    联合使用减少SARS-CoV-2进入细胞并调节对感染的免疫反应的药物是治疗COVID-19的另一种实用方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection normally damages the respiratory system but might likewise impair endocrine organs\' function. Thyroid dysfunction and hyperglycemia are common endocrine complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and associated complications, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hospitalization, and death, are thought to have increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of this study was to review the available data about the incidence rate of T1D and accompanying complications since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature review was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar. The keywords \"T1D, T1DM, Type 1 DM or Type 1 Diabetes\", \"Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19\" were used to search these databases. Titles and abstracts were screened for selection, and then relevant studies were reviewed in full text.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 25 manuscripts out of 304 identified studies were selected. There were 15 (60%) multicenter or nationwide studies. The data about the incidence rate of T1D, hospitalization, and death are not consistent across countries; however, DKA incidence and severity seem to be higher during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study\'s data collection demonstrated that COVID-19 might or might not increase the incidence of T1D. Nevertheless, it is associated with the higher incidence and severity of DKA in T1D patients. This finding might indicate that antivirals are not fully protective against the endocrine complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which promotes the application of an alternative approach.
    UNASSIGNED: Combining medications that reduce SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cells and modulate the immune response to infection is an alternative practical approach to treating COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号