Chronic non-specific low back pain

慢性非特异性下腰痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNSLBP)是一种普遍的疾病,在全球范围内引起巨大的痛苦和医疗费用。尽管有各种治疗方法,有效的管理仍然具有挑战性。普拉提,因其对核心力量和姿势对齐的关注而得到认可,已经成为一种有希望的干预措施。这项研究调查了普拉提中身心对指导参与者对CNSLBP结果的影响。方法:对67名参与者进行了一项随机对照试验,18至65岁,患有CNSLBP。他们被分为两组:带身心提示的普拉提(n=34)和不带提示的普拉提(n=33)。两组均接受60分钟的治疗,每周两次,共8周。结果测量包括疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分),功能性残疾(罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷),对运动的恐惧(运动恐惧症的坦帕量表),和坚持(参加会议的百分比)。通过重复测量ANOVA确定统计学显著性。结果:两组在疼痛减轻方面均有明显改善,功能能力,和运动恐惧症。然而,与无提示组相比,身心组表现出明显的运动恐惧症减少(p=0.048),表明在CNSLBP中,身心线索在管理与运动相关的恐惧方面的潜在额外益处。结论:本研究强调了8周普拉提干预在管理CNSLBP方面的有效性,强调身心线索在减少对运动的恐惧方面的附加价值。这些发现表明,在普拉提中加入身心暗示可以增强治疗效果,特别是对于运动相关恐惧程度较高的患者,可能改善长期坚持体力活动和康复结果。
    Background/Objectives: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a prevalent condition causing significant distress and healthcare costs globally. Despite various treatments, effective management remains challenging. Pilates, recognized for its focus on core strength and postural alignment, has emerged as a promising intervention. This study investigates the impact of mind-body in Pilates for directing participants on CNSLBP outcomes. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 67 participants, aged 18 to 65 years, suffering from CNSLBP. They were allocated into two groups: Pilates with mind-body cueing (n = 34) and Pilates without cueing (n = 33). Both groups underwent 60 min sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), functional disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), and adherence (percentage of sessions attended). Statistical significance was determined through repeated measures ANOVA. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in pain reduction, functional ability, and kinesiophobia. However, the mind-body group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in kinesiophobia compared to the non-cueing group (p = 0.048), indicating the potential additional benefit of mind-body cueing in managing movement-related fear in CNSLBP. Conclusions: This study underscores the effectiveness of an 8-week Pilates intervention in managing CNSLBP, highlighting the added value of mind-body cueing in reducing fear of movement. These findings suggest incorporating mind-body cueing in Pilates could enhance the therapeutic benefits, particularly for patients with high levels of movement-related fear, potentially improving long-term adherence to physical activity and rehabilitation outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如今,由于生活方式的改变,患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的年轻人数量逐渐增加。最近的下腰痛治疗指南强调运动疗法是CNLBP的首选治疗方法。本研究以普通高校男生CNLBP为研究对象,重点研究了核心稳定性训练如何影响青少年CNLBP的疼痛和肌肉功能。在这里,将60名男性受试者随机分为对照组和实验组,并于2023年9月至10月在广西师范大学运动康复实验室进行了随机对照试验。对照组采用传统腰力训练,实验组接受核心稳定性训练。VAS评分,评估疼痛症状评分和临床疗效分级.评估了腰部肌肉的健康状况,包括背部肌肉力量,俯卧的上半身向上的静态保持时间,1分钟修改仰卧起坐仰卧腹部卷曲的静态保持时间和仰卧腿部抬高的静态保持时间。还使用Othwestry残疾指数(ODI)问卷评估了腰部运动功能。从腹直肌收集表面肌电图(EMG)信号,直立脊髓和多裂。组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内运动前后数据比较采用配对样本t检验。研究结果发现,运动后实验组和对照组的CNLBP均得到改善。与锻炼前相比,VAS评分显著下降(95CI:2.51至6.51,p=0.000),疼痛症状评分(95CI:2.95至3.55,p=0.000),ODI的腰部运动功能评估得分(95CI:2.23至4.31,p=0.000),腹直肌IEMG值(95CI:2.29至4.39,p=0.000),运动后实验组的直立脊髓和多裂IEMG值(95CI:2.18至4.45,p=0.000)。与锻炼前相比,背部肌肉力量显着改善(95CI:12.85至19.49,p=0.000),俯卧上身的静态保持时间(95CI:9.67至19.17,p=0.000),1分钟修改的仰卧起坐(95CI:8.56至18.12,p=0.000),仰卧腹部卷曲的静态保持时间(95CI:6.73至19.14,p=0.000),实验组运动后仰卧腿抬高的静态保持时间(95CI:8.21至18.35,p=0.000)。在练习后,VAS评分明显较低(95CI:1.41至4.98,p=0.000),疼痛症状评分(95CI:1.14至1.79,p=0.011),ODI的腰部运动功能评估得分(95CI:1.13至2.25,p=0.000),腹直肌IEMG值(95CI:2.36至4.47,p=0.000),实验组的竖脊肌和多裂肌IEMG值(95CI:2.24至4.23,p=0.017)高于对照组。在练习后,回收率显著更高(p=0.000),俯卧上身的静态保持时间(95CI:4.16至8.32,p=0.008),实验组仰卧腹部冰壶的静态保持时间(95CI:3.89至7.44,p=0.000)优于对照组。因此,可以得出结论,核心稳定性训练在治疗青年CNLBP方面显着有效,增强下背部肌肉功能。这种治疗效果主要归因于肌肉功能的改善。
    Nowadays, due to lifestyle changes, the number of young people suffering from chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is gradually increasing. The recent guidelines for the treatment of low back pain emphasize that exercise therapy is the preferred treatment method for CNLBP. This study take ordinary college male students with CNLBP as objective of the study, focused into how core stability training affected the pain and muscle function of the CNLBP of youth. Herein, 60 male subjects were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, and conducted a randomized control trial in the Sports Rehabilitation Laboratory of Guangxi Normal University from September to October 2023. The control group received traditional waist strength training, while the experimental group received core stability training. VAS scores, pain symptoms scores and clinical efficacy grades were evaluated. Waist muscles fitness was evaluated, including back muscle strength, the prone upper body up\'s static holding time, 1-min modified sit-ups\' pcs, the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time and the supine leg raising\'s static holding time. Waist movement function was also evaluated using oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were collected from rectus abdominis, erector spinae and multifidus. The independent sample t-test was used to compare groups, and the paired sample t-test was used for the data comparison before and post-exercise within the group. The results of the study found that CNLBP was improved in both the experimental and control groups in the post-exercise. Compared to pre-exercise, there are significant decrease in the VAS scores (95%CI: 2.51 to 6.51, p = 0.000), pain symptoms scores (95%CI: 2.95 to 3.55, p = 0.000), waist movement function\'s evaluation scores for ODI (95%CI: 2.23 to 4.31, p = 0.000), rectus abdominis\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.29 to 4.39, p = 0.000), erector spinae and multifidus\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.18 to 4.45, p = 0.000) of experimental group in the post-exercise. Compared to pre-exercise, there are significant improvement in the back muscle strength (95%CI: 12.85 to 19.49, p = 0.000), the prone upper body up\'s static holding time (95%CI: 9.67 to 19.17, p = 0.000), the 1-min modified sit-ups\' pcs (95%CI: 8.56 to 18.12, p = 0.000), the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time (95%CI: 6.73 to 19.14, p = 0.000), and the supine leg raising\'s static holding time (95%CI: 8.21 to 18.35, p = 0.000) of experimental group in the post-exercise. In the post-exercise,there are significant lower in the VAS scores (95%CI: 1.41 to 4.98, p = 0.000), pain symptoms scores (95%CI: 1.14 to 1.79, p = 0.011), waist movement function\'s evaluation scores for ODI (95%CI: 1.13 to 2.25, p = 0.000), rectus abdominis\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.36 to 4.47, p = 0.000), erector spinae and multifidus\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.24 to 4.23, p = 0.017) of experimental group than those of control group. In the post-exercise, there are significant higher in the recovery rate (p = 0.000), the prone upper body up\'s static holding time (95%CI: 4.16 to 8.32, p = 0.008), and the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time (95%CI: 3.89 to 7.44, p = 0.000) of experimental group than those of control group. Therefore, it can be concluded that core stability training is significantly effective in treating CNLBP in youth, enhancing lower back muscle function. This therapeutic effect is primarily attributed to the improvement in muscle function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的患者通常会经历姿势控制受损,导致疼痛复发。尽管重复周围磁刺激(rPMS)结合核心肌肉训练(CMT)可以改善姿势控制,其神经机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨rPMS对CNLBP患者影响的姿势控制相关皮层机制。
    方法:这个单中心,prospective,随机化,双盲,对照试验于2023年5月至12月在一家公立医院进行.共有40名患者(27名女性,13名男性,平均年龄29.38±7.72)的CNLBP患者被随机分配到rPMS组(realrPMS+CMT)或假rPMS组(假rPMS+CMT),共4周12个疗程.将rPMS应用于疼痛一侧的腰椎旁多裂肌。在干预前后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)对疼痛和残疾进行量化。此外,使用力平台测量压力中心(COP)的摇摆面积和速度。通过功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)在干预前后记录了4项任务(在稳定/不稳定的平面上睁眼/闭眼站立)中6个感兴趣区域的皮层活动。应用重复测量ANOVA进行统计分析。使用Spearman相关性来确定变量之间的关系。
    结果:干预后,与假rPMS组相比,rPMS组显示疼痛强度降低(p=0.001)和摇摆面积(闭眼任务不稳定)(p=0.046).此外,rPMS组显示在左初级运动皮质(M1)激活增加(p=0.042)和在左补充运动区(SMA)减少(p=0.045),而假rPMS组无明显变化。在静态平衡任务下,左侧M1的激活增加与疼痛强度(r=-0.537,p=0.018)和摇摆面积(r=-0.500,p=0.029)的减少呈负相关。此外,rPMS干预后摇摆速度与VAS呈正相关(r=0.451,p=0.046)。
    结论:重复外周磁刺激联合核心肌肉训练显示出更好的镇痛效果和姿势控制改善,与假刺激相比。这可能归因于左初级运动皮层的激活增加。
    背景:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(ChiCTR2300070943)上注册。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) often experience impaired postural control, contributing to pain recurrence. Although repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) combined with core muscle training (CMT) could improve postural control, its neural mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the postural control-related cortical mechanism of the effect of rPMS on patients with CNLBP.
    METHODS: This unicentric, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in a public hospital from May to December 2023. A total of 40 patients (27 females and 13 males, mean age 29.38 ± 7.72) with CNLBP were randomly assigned to either the rPMS group (real rPMS with CMT) or the sham-rPMS group (sham-rPMS with CMT) for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. The rPMS was applied to the lumbar paravertebral multifidus muscle on the painful side. Pain and disability were quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) pre- and post-intervention. Furthermore, the sway area and velocity of the center of pressure (COP) were measured using a force platform. The cortical activities in 6 regions of interest during 4 tasks (standing with eyes open/closed on a stable/unstable plane) were recorded by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) pre- and post-intervention. The repeated measure ANOVA was applied for statistical analysis. Spearman\'s correlation was used to determine the relationships between variables.
    RESULTS: After the intervention, the rPMS group showed decreased pain intensity (p = 0.001) and sway area (unstable eyes-closed task) (p = 0.046) compared to the sham-rPMS group. Additionally, the rPMS group exhibited increased activation in left primary motor cortex (M1) (p = 0.042) and reduced in left supplementary motor area (SMA) (p = 0.045), whereas the sham-rPMS group showed no significant changes. The increased activation of left M1 was negatively correlated to the reduction of pain intensity (r = - 0.537, p = 0.018) and sway area (r = - 0.500, p = 0.029) under the static balancing task. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between sway velocity and VAS (r = 0.451, p = 0.046) post-rPMS intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with core muscle training demonstrated better analgesic effects and postural control improvements, compared to sham-stimulation. This may be attributed to the increased activation of the left primary motor cortex.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2300070943).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查希腊慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNSLBP)样本中匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(GR-PSQI)的希腊语翻译的心理测量学特性,因此,提供其作为临床实践中广泛使用的睡眠评估工具的清晰度和可接受性的见解。无症状志愿者(n=73)和CNSLBP志愿者(n=47),参与研究。对于结构效度的评估,使用已知组方法。因此,所有参与者(无症状和CNSLBP)均完成GR-PSQI.对于并发有效性的评估,CNSLBP参与者还完成了以下经过验证的抑郁症问卷,失眠和睡眠质量:贝克抑郁量表(BDI),失眠严重程度指数(ISI),和睡眠质量数字评定量表(SQNRS)。对于重测可靠性的评估,CNSLBP参与者第二次完成了GR-PSQI,一周后的第一次。结果显示了优异的重测可靠性(ICC=0.969,SEM=0.90,SDD=2.49%)和内部一致性(Cronbachα=0.985),PSQI中中等到良好的并发有效性(从r=0.556到r=0.860),BDI,SQNRS,还有ISI,以及良好的结构效度(p=0.000)。PSQI的希腊语翻译可能是临床和研究环境中希腊医疗保健专业人员的宝贵工具。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate psychometric properties of the Greek translation of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (GR-PSQI) in a Greek chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) sample, thus, providing insight on its clarity and acceptability as a widely used sleep assessment tool in clinical practice. Asymptomatic volunteers (n = 73) and CNSLBP volunteers (n = 47), participated in the study. For the assessment of construct validity, the known-groups method was used. Thus, all the participants (asymptomatic and CNSLBP) completed the GR-PSQI. For the assessment of concurrent validity, the CNSLBP participants additionally completed the following validated questionnaires for depression, insomnia and sleep quality: Beck Depression Inventory Questionnaire (BDI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Sleep Quality Numeric Rating Scale (SQNRS). For the assessment of test-retest reliability, the CNSLBP participants completed the GR-PSQI a second time, one week after the first time. The results showed excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.969, SEM = 0.90, SDD = 2.49%) and internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.985), moderate to good concurrent validity (from r = 0.556 to r = 0.860) among PSQI, BDI, SQNRS, and ISI, as well as excellent construct validity (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The Greek translation of PSQI could be a valuable tool for Greek healthcare professionals in both clinical and research environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    个人在初级保健机构和即时护理中心寻求医疗护理的最常见原因是腰背痛(LBP)。在一段时间内,由腰痛引起的残疾已经上升了足够多,特别是在低收入或中等收入的国家。在未来的几年里,在低收入或中等收入国家,与LBP相关的减值和费用可能会增加,特别是当脆弱的医疗系统无法处理这种日益增长的负荷时。因此,这篇综述的重点是远程康复(TR)对LBP的有效性。TR的显著优点可以包括更大的交互和对医学治疗的远程可访问性。通过更有效的互动,可以交流知识和健康信息,这有利于患者,家庭,看护者,医师,和研究人员。生活在遥远地方的人们现在有机会获得医疗救助,帮助家庭照顾反应能力差的患者。此外,它提供了迅速检测的潜力,在紧急情况下开始治疗,住院时间缩短,不断监测那些处于危险之中的人,和整体时间和费用的节省。因此,这项研究支持TR在LBP条件下的应用,用于资源匮乏地区患者的早期治疗和疼痛缓解.
    The most frequent reason for individuals to seek medical attention in both primary care settings and immediate care centers is low back pain (LBP). Over a duration of time, the disability caused by lower back pain has risen enough, particularly in countries with low or moderate incomes. In the coming years, there may be an increase in LBP-related impairment and expenses in countries with low or medium incomes, particularly when fragile medical systems are unable to handle this growing load. Hence, this review focuses on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation (TR) on LBP. The significant advantages of TR may include greater interaction and remote accessibility to medical treatments. The exchange of knowledge and health information is made possible through a more effective interaction, which benefits patients, families, carers, physicians, and researchers. People who live in distant places now have the opportunity to get medical attention assisting families in caring for patients with poor responsiveness. In addition, it provides the potential for prompt detection, the beginning of treatment in the midst of an emergency, a shorter stay in the hospital, ongoing monitoring of those at risk, and overall time and expense savings. Therefore, this study supports the application of TR in conditions of LBP for early management and relief of pain for patients in low-resource areas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)是一种以疼痛为特征的复杂疾病,功能障碍,睡眠不安,焦虑,和抑郁症,所有这些都会损害生活质量。以前的研究表明,练习太极拳对慢性腰背痛有影响。然而,缺乏关于它对睡眠的影响的证据。该试验将评估太极拳作为CNLBP老年人失眠的治疗方法。
    未经评估:研究设计将是随机的,控制,开放标签试用。参与者(n=106)将从成都中医药大学医院招募,庆阳区老年大学,和慈塘街社区。参与者将被随机分配到太极拳组(n=53)和对照组(n=53)。太极拳小组将接受为期8周的杨式24式太极拳计划。对照组将有8周的等待期,随后是8周的太极拳练习。这项研究的主要结果将是睡眠质量和疼痛强度的变化。次要结果将包括疼痛质量的变化,运动范围,物理性能,社会支持,和整体生活质量。任何不良事件和出勤率也将在本研究中报告。
    未经评估:ChiCTR2200064977。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a complex condition characterized by pain, dysfunction, disturbed sleep, anxiety, and depression, all of which impair the quality of life. Previous studies showed that practicing Tai Chi had effects on chronic low back pain. However, there is a lack of evidence on its impact on sleep. The trial will evaluate the use of Tai Chi as a treatment for insomnia in elderly people with CNLBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The study design will be a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Participants (n = 106) will be recruited from the Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qing Yang District University for the Elderly, and Ci Tang Street Community. Participants will be randomly assigned to the Tai Chi group (n = 53) and the control group (n = 53). The Tai Chi group will undergo a Yang-style 24-form Tai Chi program for 8 weeks. The control group will have a waiting period of 8 weeks, followed by 8 weeks of Tai Chi practice. The primary outcomes of this study will be changes in sleep quality and pain intensity. Secondary outcomes of interest will include changes in the quality of pain, range of motion, physical performance, social support, and overall quality of life. Any adverse events and attendance rates will also be reported in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR2200064977.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)是全球残疾的主要原因之一。穴位埋线(ACE)在中国被广泛用于治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛,但尚无严格的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实ACE治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的有效性和安全性.在这项研究中,我们设计了一个单中心,单盲,前瞻性RCT,目的是评估ACE治疗CNLBP的有效性和安全性。82名CNLBP患者将以1:1的比例随机分为ACE组和假ACE组。参与者将每2周接受一次ACE治疗或假ACE治疗,为期8周,随访6个月。主要结果将是治疗前后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的变化。次要结果将包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)和简短表格36-健康调查(SF-36)。将记录试验过程中发生的不良事件。将根据预定义的统计分析计划分析数据。本研究获得广州市番禺中医医院医学伦理委员会批准(202230)。需要患者的书面知情同意书。本试验在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200059245)注册。试验结果将发表在同行评审的学术期刊上。
    UNASSIGNED:https://www。chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR2200059245。
    Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Acupoint embedding (ACE) is widely used in China for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain, but there are no rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to confirm the effectiveness and safety of ACE for chronic non-specific low back pain. In this study, we design a single-center, single-blind, prospective RCT, with the aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of ACE for CNLBP. 82 participants with CNLBP will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into an ACE group and a sham ACE group. Participants will receive either ACE treatment or sham ACE treatment at once every 2 weeks, for an 8-week period, and followed by 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome will be the change in visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Short Form 36-Health Survey (SF-36). Adverse events that occur during the course of the trial will be recorded. Data will be analyzed according to a predefined statistical analysis plan. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Guangzhou Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine (202230). Written informed consent from patients is required. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200059245). Trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2200059245.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查全身振动运动(WBVE)和核心稳定运动(CSE)对疼痛的有效性,肌肉力量,慢性非特异性下腰痛(NLBP)患者的功能恢复。
    在2016年6月至2017年7月之间,共有74名NLBP患者(12名男性,62名女性;平均年龄:44.7±8.9岁;范围,24至64岁)被包括在这个前瞻性中,随机对照研究。患者被随机分配到WBVE组(WBVEG,n=25),CSE组(CSEG,(n=25),以家庭锻炼组为对照组(CG,(n=24)。所有组进行了24次锻炼,共八周。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量临床结果,罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ),计算机等速肌力(IMS)和渐进式等惯性提升评估(PILE)测试。
    WBVEG和CSEG的VAS和RMDQ评分在统计学上显著降低(p<0.05)。WBVEG和CSEG与CG相比,治疗前和激烈活动期间三个月的VAS评分差异显着(p<0.05)。IMS值,除等速屈曲总功(IKFTW)外,三组均显著升高(p<0.05)。在WBVEG和CSEG中IKFTW值显著增加(p<0.05)。在所有三组中观察到PILE的功能工作性能的统计学显着提高(p<0.05)。WBVEG和CSEG的治疗前和三个月的PILE测试(地面到背部和背部到肩部)与CG的差异显着(p<0.05)。
    在慢性NLBP的治疗中,WBVE和CSE似乎在疼痛和功能方面有效。尽管三组的肌肉力量和功能工作表现均有显着改善,在WBVEG和CSEG中观察到比CG更大的改善。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of whole-body vibration exercise (WBVE) and core stabilization exercise (CSE) on pain, muscle strength, and functional recovery in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (NLBP).
    UNASSIGNED: Between June 2016 and July 2017, a total of 74 patients with NLBP (12 males, 62 females; mean age: 44.7±8.9 years; range, 24 to 64 years) were included in this prospective, randomized-controlled study. The patients were randomly assigned to WBVE group (WBVEG, n=25), CSE group (CSEG, (n=25), and home exercise group as the control group (CG, (n=24). All groups performed 24 sessions of exercise for a total of eight weeks. Clinical outcome was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), computerized isokinetic muscle strengths (IMS) and progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (PILE) test.
    UNASSIGNED: The VAS and RMDQ scores in WBVEG and CSEG statistically significantly decreased (p<0.05). The difference between the pre-treatment and at three-month VAS scores during intense activity were significantly different in both WBVEG and CSEG than the CG (p<0.05). The IMS values, except for the isokinetic flexion total work (IKFTW), increased significantly in all three groups (p<0.05). The IKFTW values increased significantly in the WBVEG and CSEG (p<0.05). A statistically significant increase in the functional work performance with PILE was observed in all three groups (p<0.05). The differences between the pre-treatment and three-month PILE test (ground to back and back to shoulder) were significantly different in both WBVEG and CSEG than the CG (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: In the treatment of chronic NLBP, WBVE and CSE appear to be effective in pain and functionality. Although there was a significant improvement in muscle strength and functional work performance in all three groups, greater improvements were observed in the WBVEG and CSEG than the CG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:慢性非特异性下腰痛(CLBP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,患者寻求补充和替代药物治疗,包括激光针灸(LA)。侵入性LA(ILA)涉及在穴位和聚焦激光照射的同时应用侵入性针灸治疗。由于临床试验数据不足,ILA对CLBP的疗效仍存在争议。我们打算通过比较不同波长ILA对CLBP的影响来获得有关ILA对CLBP的有效性和安全性的基本数据。
    方法:这将是一个前瞻性的,病人失明,平行臂,单中心(东新大学光州韩国医学医院,大韩民国),先导随机对照临床试验。45名CLBP参与者将被随机分为相同数量的对照组,650-nmILA(650ILA),或830-nmILA(830ILA)基团。对照组将接受假ILA10分钟和真正的电针(EA)10分钟。650和830ILA组将收到真实的ILA(即,650ILA组,650-nm波长;830ILA组,830nm波长)10分钟,真实EA10分钟一次/天,每周两次,连续4周,在双侧神舒(BL23),七海树(BL24),大厂树(BL25),和环条(GB30)。主要结果将是使用视觉模拟量表评估的疼痛强度的改善。韩国版本的Oswestry残疾指数和欧洲生活质量五维五级量表的分数将被记录为次要结果指标。所有分数将在基线(干预前)记录,第一次干预后4周(干预结束时),和4周后完成干预。
    结论:该研究有望提供有关疗效的初步证据,安全,以及ILA治疗CLBP的有效性。
    背景:该试验已在临床研究信息服务处注册(注册编号:KCT0004610;http://cris。nih.走吧。kr)。于2020年1月7日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder for which patients seek complementary and alternative medical treatments, including laser acupuncture (LA). Invasive LA (ILA) involves the simultaneous application of invasive acupuncture treatment at acupoints and focused laser irradiation. The efficacy of ILA for CLBP remains controversial owing to the insufficient clinical trial data. We intend to obtain basic data regarding the efficacy and safety of ILA for CLBP by comparing the effects of different wavelengths of ILA on CLBP.
    METHODS: This will be a prospective, patient-blinded, parallel-arm, single-center (DongShin University Gwangju Korean Medicine Hospital, Republic of Korea), pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty-five participants with CLBP will be randomized in equal numbers into the control, 650-nm ILA (650 ILA), or 830-nm ILA (830 ILA) group. The control group will receive sham ILA for 10 min and real electroacupuncture (EA) for 10 min. The 650 and 830 ILA groups will receive real ILA (i.e., 650 ILA group, 650-nm wavelength; 830 ILA group, 830-nm wavelength) for 10 min and real EA for 10 min once/day, twice a week for 4 weeks, at bilateral Shenshu (BL23), Qihaishu (BL24), Dachangshu (BL25), and Huantiao (GB30). The primary outcome will be an improvement in pain intensity assessed using the visual analog scale. Scores in the Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level scale will be recorded as secondary outcome measures. All scores will be recorded at baseline (before intervention), 4 weeks after the first intervention (at the end of the intervention), and 4 weeks after completion of the intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study is expected to provide preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and usefulness of ILA for the treatment of CLBP.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (registration No. KCT0004610 ; http://cris.nih.go.kr ). Registered on 7 January 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To illustrate the effectiveness of the Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) as a guide to exercise intervention on chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).
    UNASSIGNED: A 23-year-old male volleyball athlete with CNLBP was evaluated using the SFMA to assess the degree of physical dysfunctions. And then two-stage exercise protocol was designed based on the results of SFMA. The athlete conducted the exercise intervention for 8 weeks, 1 h each time, three times a week. Transverse abdominal muscles and multifidus muscle thickness, the degree of low back pain, and the degree of physical dysfunctions were measured at pre-intervention, midintervention, and post-intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results of SFMA, the exercise protocol in the first 4-week session was designed mainly to develop the mobility of ankle, hip, and chest and the stability of lumbar, hip, and knee, in order to improve core strength and gluteal muscle strength. The second 4-week session was an advanced stage with the increase of exercise load on the basis of flexibility and stability; its main purpose was to loosen the hamstring muscles and continue strengthening the core stability and finally help the participant to establish the correct movement pattern and solve the problems of dysfunctions. After 8-week exercise intervention, all movement patterns became functional/non-painful except the deep squat pattern; the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score decreased from 11 to 2; visual analog scale score decreased from 4 to 2; the thicknesses of the transverse abdominis muscles (right side: 0.2 vs. 0.31 cm, left side: 0.22 vs. 0.33 cm) and multifidus muscles (right side: 2.09 vs. 2.26 cm, left side: 2.15 vs. 2.29 cm) were both increased.
    UNASSIGNED: In this case, the SFMA helped to recognize problems related to mobility and stability on the hip joint, thoracic spine, and even areas far away from the lumbar spine in an athlete with CNLBP that were not seen with more conventional examination procedures. The improvements of physical function, the increase in deep core muscles thickness, and the released pain after exercise intervention all verified the effectiveness of SFMA to qualitatively analyze movement patterns at examination and to direct subsequent exercise intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号