Chronic non-specific low back pain

慢性非特异性下腰痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下腰痛(LBP)是一个主要的全球公共卫生问题。证据表明,LBP也与认知有关,心理,和生活方式因素。Fu的皮下针刺(FSN)已用于治疗肌肉骨骼问题多年。这项前瞻性随机对照试验旨在评估FSN治疗慢性非特异性LBP患者的临床疗效和恐惧回避信念。
    方法:将90例慢性非特异性LBP患者随机分为FSN和传统针灸(TA)组(n=45),从2021年12月至2023年3月连续3天接受FSN或TA治疗。主要结果是通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)测量的疼痛强度。次要结果是躯干伸肌耐力(TEE),腰椎运动范围(ROM),和恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)。在第一次治疗之前和每次治疗之后进行结果测量。治疗后1个月进行VAS和FABQ评分的随访评估。
    结果:FSN组干预后各时间点的VAS和FABQ评分均显著低于TA组(P<0.01)。FSN组TEE和腰椎ROM评分高于TA组(P<0.01)。重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)显示出显著的时间效应,群体效应,和VAS的相互作用效应,TEE,腰部ROM,FABQ与FABQ比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗后一个月,FSN组VAS和FABQ评分明显低于TA组(P<0.05)。
    结论:这项研究表明,FSN在治疗慢性非特异性LBP的临床疗效和避免恐惧信念方面优于TA。FSN可作为一种有效的临床治疗手段。
    OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) is a major global public health problem. Evidence shows that LBP is also related to cognitive, psychological, and lifestyle factors. Fu\'s subcutaneous needling (FSN) has been used for the treatment of musculoskeletal problems for many years. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and fear avoidance beliefs of FSN in the treatment of patients with chronic non-specific LBP.
    METHODS: Ninety participants with chronic non-specific LBP were randomly divided into the FSN and the traditional acupuncture (TA) groups (n = 45) and received either FSN or TA treatment for three consecutive days from December 2021 to March 2023. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were trunk extensor endurance (TEE), lumbar range of motion (ROM), and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Outcome measurements were made before the first treatment and after each treatment. Follow-up assessments of VAS and FABQ scores were conducted one month after treatment.
    RESULTS: The FSN group had significantly lower VAS and FABQ scores at each time point after intervention compared to the TA group (P < 0.01). The scores of TEE and lumbar ROM were higher in the FSN group than those in the TA group (P < 0.01). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant time effects, group effects, and interaction effects for VAS, TEE, lumbar ROM, and FABQ in both groups (P < 0.01). One month after treatment, the FSN group had significantly lower VAS and FABQ scores compared to the TA group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that FSN was superior to TA in terms of clinical efficacy and fear-avoidance beliefs in the treatment of chronic non-specific LBP. FSN could be used as an effective clinical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    如今,由于生活方式的改变,患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的年轻人数量逐渐增加。最近的下腰痛治疗指南强调运动疗法是CNLBP的首选治疗方法。本研究以普通高校男生CNLBP为研究对象,重点研究了核心稳定性训练如何影响青少年CNLBP的疼痛和肌肉功能。在这里,将60名男性受试者随机分为对照组和实验组,并于2023年9月至10月在广西师范大学运动康复实验室进行了随机对照试验。对照组采用传统腰力训练,实验组接受核心稳定性训练。VAS评分,评估疼痛症状评分和临床疗效分级.评估了腰部肌肉的健康状况,包括背部肌肉力量,俯卧的上半身向上的静态保持时间,1分钟修改仰卧起坐仰卧腹部卷曲的静态保持时间和仰卧腿部抬高的静态保持时间。还使用Othwestry残疾指数(ODI)问卷评估了腰部运动功能。从腹直肌收集表面肌电图(EMG)信号,直立脊髓和多裂。组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内运动前后数据比较采用配对样本t检验。研究结果发现,运动后实验组和对照组的CNLBP均得到改善。与锻炼前相比,VAS评分显著下降(95CI:2.51至6.51,p=0.000),疼痛症状评分(95CI:2.95至3.55,p=0.000),ODI的腰部运动功能评估得分(95CI:2.23至4.31,p=0.000),腹直肌IEMG值(95CI:2.29至4.39,p=0.000),运动后实验组的直立脊髓和多裂IEMG值(95CI:2.18至4.45,p=0.000)。与锻炼前相比,背部肌肉力量显着改善(95CI:12.85至19.49,p=0.000),俯卧上身的静态保持时间(95CI:9.67至19.17,p=0.000),1分钟修改的仰卧起坐(95CI:8.56至18.12,p=0.000),仰卧腹部卷曲的静态保持时间(95CI:6.73至19.14,p=0.000),实验组运动后仰卧腿抬高的静态保持时间(95CI:8.21至18.35,p=0.000)。在练习后,VAS评分明显较低(95CI:1.41至4.98,p=0.000),疼痛症状评分(95CI:1.14至1.79,p=0.011),ODI的腰部运动功能评估得分(95CI:1.13至2.25,p=0.000),腹直肌IEMG值(95CI:2.36至4.47,p=0.000),实验组的竖脊肌和多裂肌IEMG值(95CI:2.24至4.23,p=0.017)高于对照组。在练习后,回收率显著更高(p=0.000),俯卧上身的静态保持时间(95CI:4.16至8.32,p=0.008),实验组仰卧腹部冰壶的静态保持时间(95CI:3.89至7.44,p=0.000)优于对照组。因此,可以得出结论,核心稳定性训练在治疗青年CNLBP方面显着有效,增强下背部肌肉功能。这种治疗效果主要归因于肌肉功能的改善。
    Nowadays, due to lifestyle changes, the number of young people suffering from chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is gradually increasing. The recent guidelines for the treatment of low back pain emphasize that exercise therapy is the preferred treatment method for CNLBP. This study take ordinary college male students with CNLBP as objective of the study, focused into how core stability training affected the pain and muscle function of the CNLBP of youth. Herein, 60 male subjects were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, and conducted a randomized control trial in the Sports Rehabilitation Laboratory of Guangxi Normal University from September to October 2023. The control group received traditional waist strength training, while the experimental group received core stability training. VAS scores, pain symptoms scores and clinical efficacy grades were evaluated. Waist muscles fitness was evaluated, including back muscle strength, the prone upper body up\'s static holding time, 1-min modified sit-ups\' pcs, the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time and the supine leg raising\'s static holding time. Waist movement function was also evaluated using oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire. Surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were collected from rectus abdominis, erector spinae and multifidus. The independent sample t-test was used to compare groups, and the paired sample t-test was used for the data comparison before and post-exercise within the group. The results of the study found that CNLBP was improved in both the experimental and control groups in the post-exercise. Compared to pre-exercise, there are significant decrease in the VAS scores (95%CI: 2.51 to 6.51, p = 0.000), pain symptoms scores (95%CI: 2.95 to 3.55, p = 0.000), waist movement function\'s evaluation scores for ODI (95%CI: 2.23 to 4.31, p = 0.000), rectus abdominis\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.29 to 4.39, p = 0.000), erector spinae and multifidus\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.18 to 4.45, p = 0.000) of experimental group in the post-exercise. Compared to pre-exercise, there are significant improvement in the back muscle strength (95%CI: 12.85 to 19.49, p = 0.000), the prone upper body up\'s static holding time (95%CI: 9.67 to 19.17, p = 0.000), the 1-min modified sit-ups\' pcs (95%CI: 8.56 to 18.12, p = 0.000), the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time (95%CI: 6.73 to 19.14, p = 0.000), and the supine leg raising\'s static holding time (95%CI: 8.21 to 18.35, p = 0.000) of experimental group in the post-exercise. In the post-exercise,there are significant lower in the VAS scores (95%CI: 1.41 to 4.98, p = 0.000), pain symptoms scores (95%CI: 1.14 to 1.79, p = 0.011), waist movement function\'s evaluation scores for ODI (95%CI: 1.13 to 2.25, p = 0.000), rectus abdominis\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.36 to 4.47, p = 0.000), erector spinae and multifidus\' IEMG values (95%CI: 2.24 to 4.23, p = 0.017) of experimental group than those of control group. In the post-exercise, there are significant higher in the recovery rate (p = 0.000), the prone upper body up\'s static holding time (95%CI: 4.16 to 8.32, p = 0.008), and the supine abdominal curling\'s static holding time (95%CI: 3.89 to 7.44, p = 0.000) of experimental group than those of control group. Therefore, it can be concluded that core stability training is significantly effective in treating CNLBP in youth, enhancing lower back muscle function. This therapeutic effect is primarily attributed to the improvement in muscle function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)的患者通常会经历姿势控制受损,导致疼痛复发。尽管重复周围磁刺激(rPMS)结合核心肌肉训练(CMT)可以改善姿势控制,其神经机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨rPMS对CNLBP患者影响的姿势控制相关皮层机制。
    方法:这个单中心,prospective,随机化,双盲,对照试验于2023年5月至12月在一家公立医院进行.共有40名患者(27名女性,13名男性,平均年龄29.38±7.72)的CNLBP患者被随机分配到rPMS组(realrPMS+CMT)或假rPMS组(假rPMS+CMT),共4周12个疗程.将rPMS应用于疼痛一侧的腰椎旁多裂肌。在干预前后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)对疼痛和残疾进行量化。此外,使用力平台测量压力中心(COP)的摇摆面积和速度。通过功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)在干预前后记录了4项任务(在稳定/不稳定的平面上睁眼/闭眼站立)中6个感兴趣区域的皮层活动。应用重复测量ANOVA进行统计分析。使用Spearman相关性来确定变量之间的关系。
    结果:干预后,与假rPMS组相比,rPMS组显示疼痛强度降低(p=0.001)和摇摆面积(闭眼任务不稳定)(p=0.046).此外,rPMS组显示在左初级运动皮质(M1)激活增加(p=0.042)和在左补充运动区(SMA)减少(p=0.045),而假rPMS组无明显变化。在静态平衡任务下,左侧M1的激活增加与疼痛强度(r=-0.537,p=0.018)和摇摆面积(r=-0.500,p=0.029)的减少呈负相关。此外,rPMS干预后摇摆速度与VAS呈正相关(r=0.451,p=0.046)。
    结论:重复外周磁刺激联合核心肌肉训练显示出更好的镇痛效果和姿势控制改善,与假刺激相比。这可能归因于左初级运动皮层的激活增加。
    背景:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(ChiCTR2300070943)上注册。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) often experience impaired postural control, contributing to pain recurrence. Although repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) combined with core muscle training (CMT) could improve postural control, its neural mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the postural control-related cortical mechanism of the effect of rPMS on patients with CNLBP.
    METHODS: This unicentric, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in a public hospital from May to December 2023. A total of 40 patients (27 females and 13 males, mean age 29.38 ± 7.72) with CNLBP were randomly assigned to either the rPMS group (real rPMS with CMT) or the sham-rPMS group (sham-rPMS with CMT) for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. The rPMS was applied to the lumbar paravertebral multifidus muscle on the painful side. Pain and disability were quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) pre- and post-intervention. Furthermore, the sway area and velocity of the center of pressure (COP) were measured using a force platform. The cortical activities in 6 regions of interest during 4 tasks (standing with eyes open/closed on a stable/unstable plane) were recorded by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) pre- and post-intervention. The repeated measure ANOVA was applied for statistical analysis. Spearman\'s correlation was used to determine the relationships between variables.
    RESULTS: After the intervention, the rPMS group showed decreased pain intensity (p = 0.001) and sway area (unstable eyes-closed task) (p = 0.046) compared to the sham-rPMS group. Additionally, the rPMS group exhibited increased activation in left primary motor cortex (M1) (p = 0.042) and reduced in left supplementary motor area (SMA) (p = 0.045), whereas the sham-rPMS group showed no significant changes. The increased activation of left M1 was negatively correlated to the reduction of pain intensity (r = - 0.537, p = 0.018) and sway area (r = - 0.500, p = 0.029) under the static balancing task. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between sway velocity and VAS (r = 0.451, p = 0.046) post-rPMS intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with core muscle training demonstrated better analgesic effects and postural control improvements, compared to sham-stimulation. This may be attributed to the increased activation of the left primary motor cortex.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2300070943).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于年轻女护士非特异性下腰痛的肌肉结构研究很少。本研究旨在通过腰椎磁共振成像研究年轻女护士慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛的腰椎伸屈肌横截面积和脂肪浸润的变化,以推测可能的发病机制。
    方法:回顾性分析58名慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛女护士和60名健康女性对照者的磁共振成像(MRI)数据。腰椎伸肌和屈肌横截面积/椎间盘横截面积之比,以及测量腰椎伸肌(竖脊肌;多裂肌)和屈肌(腰大肌)的磁共振成像信号强度,通过独立样本t检验计算和比较护士和健康对照。此外,还比较了从腰椎2(L2)-L3到L5-骶椎1(S1)的不同解剖节段的护士腰椎伸肌或屈肌的每个平均MRI信号强度,单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析了护士肌肉间的平均MRI信号强度。
    结果:患有慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛的护士与健康对照组的腰椎伸屈肌横截面积/椎间盘横截面积比值无显著差异,p>0.01。慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛护士腰椎伸肌和屈肌磁共振成像信号强度明显高于健康对照组,p<0.01。下腰椎伸肌的MRI信号强度高于上腰椎。伸肌(竖脊肌;多裂肌)的磁共振成像信号强度显着高于屈肌(腰大肌),p<0.01。
    结论:这项研究表明,患有慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛的年轻护士有腰椎伸肌和屈肌脂肪浸润,而没有肌肉萎缩。我们假设肌肉脂肪浸润可能在肌肉萎缩之前发生。因此,腰椎伸肌和屈肌的高脂肪浸润可能是年轻护士慢性双侧非特异性下腰痛的原因或结果.
    Muscle structural studies on non-specific low back pain in young female nurses are rare. This study aimed to investigate the changes of lumbar extensor and flexor muscle cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration in young female nurses with chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain by lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging to speculate on the possible pathogenesis.
    The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 58 female nurses with chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain and 60 healthy female controls were analyzed retrospectively. The lumbar extensor and flexor muscle cross-sectional area/intervertebral disc cross-sectional area ratio, as well as magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity of lumbar extensor (erector spinae; multifidus) and flexor muscles (psoas muscle) were measured, calculated and compared between nurses and healthy controls by independent samples t-test. In addition, each mean MRI signal intensity of lumbar extensor or flexor muscles in nurses at different anatomical segments from lumbar vertebrae 2 (L2)-L3 to L5-sacral vertebrae 1 (S1) was also compared, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) analyzed the mean MRI signal intensity between muscles in nurses with multiple comparisons.
    There was no significant difference in lumbar extensor and flexor muscle cross-sectional area/intervertebral disc cross-sectional area ratio between nurses with chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain and healthy controls, p > 0.01. The magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in lumbar extensor and flexor muscle was significantly higher in nurses with chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain than in healthy controls, p < 0.01. The MRI signal intensity of lumbar extensor muscle at the lower lumbar segments was higher than at the upper ones. The magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity of the extensor muscle (erector spinae; multifidus) was significantly higher than that of the flexor muscle (psoas muscle), p < 0.01.
    This study showed that young nurses with chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain have lumbar extensor and flexor muscle fatty infiltration without muscle atrophy. We hypothesized that muscle fatty infiltration may occur prior to muscle atrophy. Therefore, the high fatty infiltration of the lumbar extensor and flexor muscle may be a cause or a result of chronic bilateral non-specific low back pain in young nurses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)是一种以疼痛为特征的复杂疾病,功能障碍,睡眠不安,焦虑,和抑郁症,所有这些都会损害生活质量。以前的研究表明,练习太极拳对慢性腰背痛有影响。然而,缺乏关于它对睡眠的影响的证据。该试验将评估太极拳作为CNLBP老年人失眠的治疗方法。
    未经评估:研究设计将是随机的,控制,开放标签试用。参与者(n=106)将从成都中医药大学医院招募,庆阳区老年大学,和慈塘街社区。参与者将被随机分配到太极拳组(n=53)和对照组(n=53)。太极拳小组将接受为期8周的杨式24式太极拳计划。对照组将有8周的等待期,随后是8周的太极拳练习。这项研究的主要结果将是睡眠质量和疼痛强度的变化。次要结果将包括疼痛质量的变化,运动范围,物理性能,社会支持,和整体生活质量。任何不良事件和出勤率也将在本研究中报告。
    未经评估:ChiCTR2200064977。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a complex condition characterized by pain, dysfunction, disturbed sleep, anxiety, and depression, all of which impair the quality of life. Previous studies showed that practicing Tai Chi had effects on chronic low back pain. However, there is a lack of evidence on its impact on sleep. The trial will evaluate the use of Tai Chi as a treatment for insomnia in elderly people with CNLBP.
    UNASSIGNED: The study design will be a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Participants (n = 106) will be recruited from the Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qing Yang District University for the Elderly, and Ci Tang Street Community. Participants will be randomly assigned to the Tai Chi group (n = 53) and the control group (n = 53). The Tai Chi group will undergo a Yang-style 24-form Tai Chi program for 8 weeks. The control group will have a waiting period of 8 weeks, followed by 8 weeks of Tai Chi practice. The primary outcomes of this study will be changes in sleep quality and pain intensity. Secondary outcomes of interest will include changes in the quality of pain, range of motion, physical performance, social support, and overall quality of life. Any adverse events and attendance rates will also be reported in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR2200064977.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性非特异性下腰痛(CNLBP)是全球残疾的主要原因之一。穴位埋线(ACE)在中国被广泛用于治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛,但尚无严格的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实ACE治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的有效性和安全性.在这项研究中,我们设计了一个单中心,单盲,前瞻性RCT,目的是评估ACE治疗CNLBP的有效性和安全性。82名CNLBP患者将以1:1的比例随机分为ACE组和假ACE组。参与者将每2周接受一次ACE治疗或假ACE治疗,为期8周,随访6个月。主要结果将是治疗前后视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的变化。次要结果将包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)和简短表格36-健康调查(SF-36)。将记录试验过程中发生的不良事件。将根据预定义的统计分析计划分析数据。本研究获得广州市番禺中医医院医学伦理委员会批准(202230)。需要患者的书面知情同意书。本试验在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200059245)注册。试验结果将发表在同行评审的学术期刊上。
    UNASSIGNED:https://www。chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR2200059245。
    Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Acupoint embedding (ACE) is widely used in China for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain, but there are no rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to confirm the effectiveness and safety of ACE for chronic non-specific low back pain. In this study, we design a single-center, single-blind, prospective RCT, with the aim of evaluating the efficacy and safety of ACE for CNLBP. 82 participants with CNLBP will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into an ACE group and a sham ACE group. Participants will receive either ACE treatment or sham ACE treatment at once every 2 weeks, for an 8-week period, and followed by 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome will be the change in visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes will include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Short Form 36-Health Survey (SF-36). Adverse events that occur during the course of the trial will be recorded. Data will be analyzed according to a predefined statistical analysis plan. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Guangzhou Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine (202230). Written informed consent from patients is required. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200059245). Trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2200059245.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于65岁以上的人来说,腰痛(LBP)与平衡问题和跌倒有关。由于老化和LBP导致的本体感受的降低权重可能会导致此类平衡问题。虽然腰椎本体感觉缺陷已经在LBP中显示,并且已经发现了更广泛的缺陷的适应症,脚踝本体感觉,这对平衡控制至关重要,尚未在LBP患者中进行研究。
    有和没有LBP的社区居住老年人的踝关节本体感觉是否有差异?我们假设与没有LBP的社区居住老年人相比,有LBP的社区居住老年人的踝关节本体感觉受损。
    30名65岁以上的参与者自愿参加。15人患有LBP(M/F=2/13,年龄=72.0(4.6)岁),15名无背痛的健康对照(对照组)(M/F=2/13,年龄=72.1(4.8)岁)。在正常负重条件下测量踝关节本体感觉,使用主动运动范围辨别装置(AMEDA)。踝关节本体感觉试验的准确性表示为绝对误差(AE),常量误差(CE)和变量误差(VE)。
    在LBP组中,AE显著增大(P=0.029,95%CI=[0.00,0.90]),CE也显著较大(P=0.046,95%CI=[-0.91,-0.01]),表明与对照组相比,LBP参与者的踝关节内翻被低估。两组之间的VE没有差异(P=0.520,95%CI=[-0.20,0.59])。疼痛强度与AE之间无显著相关性,CE或VE(P>0.05)。
    与健康同龄人相比,患有LBP的老年人的踝关节本体感觉下降,提示中枢本体感觉加工受损。患有LBP的老年人低估了踝关节内翻的程度,这可能会增加跌倒的风险。因此,评估和训练踝关节本体感觉可能对患有LBP的老年人有用.
    BACKGROUND: For people above 65 years old, low-back pain (LBP) is associated with balance problems and falls. Down-weighting of proprioception due to ageing and LBP may cause such balance problems. While lumbar proprioceptive deficits have been shown in LBP and indications for more generalized deficits have been found, ankle proprioception, which is crucial for balance control, has not been studied in people with LBP.
    OBJECTIVE: Is there any difference in ankle proprioceptive acuity between community-dwelling older adults with and without LBP? We hypothesized that ankle proprioception was impaired in community-dwelling older adults with LBP compared to those without LBP.
    METHODS: Thirty participants over 65 years old volunteered. Fifteen had LBP (M/F = 2/13, age = 72.0 (4.6) years), fifteen were healthy controls without back pain (control group) (M/F = 2/13, age = 72.1 (4.8) years). Ankle proprioception was measured in normal weight-bearing conditions, using the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA). Accuracy on the ankle proprioceptive test was expressed as absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE).
    RESULTS: AE was significantly larger (P = 0.029, 95 % CI = [0.00, 0.90]) in the LBP group, CE was also significantly larger (P = 0.046, 95 % CI = [-0.91, -0.01]), indicating an underestimation of ankle inversion in participants with LBP compared to controls. VE was not different between the two groups (P = 0.520, 95 % CI = [-0.20, 0.59]). No significant correlation was found between pain intensity and AE, CE or VE (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ankle proprioception decreased in older people with LBP compared to healthy peers, suggesting impaired central proprioceptive processing. Older people with LBP underestimate the extent of ankle inversion, which may increase fall risk. Thus, evaluation and training of ankle proprioception may be useful in older people with LBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) were found with impaired postural control in previous studies. Since the trunk muscle take important efforts on core stability, the study aimed to examine the relationships of postural control during stance tasks and the contractility of trunk muscle in young adults with CNSLBP and without.
    METHODS: Healthy individuals (n = 25) and individuals with CNSLBP (n = 30) were included. The thickness of the bilateral transversus abdominis (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (MF) was measured during rest and maximal voluntary contraction, and the change percentages (TrA%, MF%) were calculated. Regarding postural control, COP path length and sway area during the stance tasks were measured thrice in each group.
    RESULTS: The bilateral TrA% of the CNSLBP group was less than that of the HC group (p < 0.05). The bilateral TrA% of the CNSLBP group was less than that of the HC group (p < 0.05). The bilateral MF% showed no significantly different(p > 0.05) between the two groups. Compared with healthy controls, CNSLBP patients resulted larger path length and sway area of COP during most of static stance tasks. During the EO task in the CNSLBP group, TrA% was found correlate to COP path length (p < 0.05); the right MF% was correlated with COP sway area (p < 0.05). No significant correlations appeared in the healthy controls (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with healthy individuals, impaired postural control during static stance with eyes open in patients with CNSLBP was likely to be related to the poor contraction ability of bilateral transversus abdominis and correlated to the normal contraction ability of right lumbar multifidus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We developed a portable non-specific low back pain measurement system EasiLBP and evaluated its performance in collecting EMG signals:during the wearer\'s movement without the assistance of a doctor, the collection of EMG signals by portable devices met problems such as large noise interference, difficulty in accurately calibrating the start and end points of the action interval, and imbalanced samples for feature recognition, et al. To challenge these problems, we proposed a small group-based noise removal method, a dynamic dual-threshold automatic method for identifying the start and end points of the motion interval, and a sampling method to balance group samples, respectively. Portable device and a medical EMG acquisition equipment Thought Technology FlexComp Infiniti 10 were used to perform EMG measurements on 15 patients with non-specific low back pain and 15 normal people. Clinical experiments and statistical analysis show that the portable EMG acquisition system has significant differences in EMG signal characteristics between normal people and non-specific low back pain patients, and it has good measurement consistency and accuracy with the medical EMG acquisition equipment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To illustrate the effectiveness of the Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA) as a guide to exercise intervention on chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).
    UNASSIGNED: A 23-year-old male volleyball athlete with CNLBP was evaluated using the SFMA to assess the degree of physical dysfunctions. And then two-stage exercise protocol was designed based on the results of SFMA. The athlete conducted the exercise intervention for 8 weeks, 1 h each time, three times a week. Transverse abdominal muscles and multifidus muscle thickness, the degree of low back pain, and the degree of physical dysfunctions were measured at pre-intervention, midintervention, and post-intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the results of SFMA, the exercise protocol in the first 4-week session was designed mainly to develop the mobility of ankle, hip, and chest and the stability of lumbar, hip, and knee, in order to improve core strength and gluteal muscle strength. The second 4-week session was an advanced stage with the increase of exercise load on the basis of flexibility and stability; its main purpose was to loosen the hamstring muscles and continue strengthening the core stability and finally help the participant to establish the correct movement pattern and solve the problems of dysfunctions. After 8-week exercise intervention, all movement patterns became functional/non-painful except the deep squat pattern; the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale score decreased from 11 to 2; visual analog scale score decreased from 4 to 2; the thicknesses of the transverse abdominis muscles (right side: 0.2 vs. 0.31 cm, left side: 0.22 vs. 0.33 cm) and multifidus muscles (right side: 2.09 vs. 2.26 cm, left side: 2.15 vs. 2.29 cm) were both increased.
    UNASSIGNED: In this case, the SFMA helped to recognize problems related to mobility and stability on the hip joint, thoracic spine, and even areas far away from the lumbar spine in an athlete with CNLBP that were not seen with more conventional examination procedures. The improvements of physical function, the increase in deep core muscles thickness, and the released pain after exercise intervention all verified the effectiveness of SFMA to qualitatively analyze movement patterns at examination and to direct subsequent exercise intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号