Child Development Disorders, Pervasive

儿童发育障碍,Pervasive
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    智力障碍(ID)通常在自闭症儿童中同时发生。尽管ID的诊断标准要求认知和适应性功能均受损,大多数基于人群的自闭症儿童共同发生ID的频率估计-包括对共同发生自闭症的种族和族裔差异的研究,以及ID的定义仅基于认知评分。这项分析的目的是研究在2至5岁自闭症儿童的特征明确的样本中,包括认知和适应性行为标准对共同发生的ID估计的影响。参与者包括3264名患有自闭症研究或社区诊断的儿童,他们参加了基于人群的探索早期发育研究(SEED)1-3阶段。仅基于Mullen早期学习量表(MSEL)复合认知得分,估计62.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:61.1%,64.7%)的自闭症儿童患有共同发生的ID。在纳入Vineland适应性行为量表后,第二版(VABS-II)复合或域标准,同时发生的ID估计降低到38.0%(95%CI:36.2,39.8%)和45.0%(95%CI:43.1,46.9%),分别。当仅使用MSEL标准时,相对于NH白人儿童,观察到的非西班牙裔(NH)黑人和西班牙裔儿童符合ID标准的几率增加,虽然没有消除,在纳入VABS-II标准并针对选定的社会经济变量进行调整后。这项研究为在自闭症流行病学研究中描述共同发生的ID中的种族和种族差异时,考虑适应性行为以及社会经济劣势的重要性提供了证据。
    Intellectual disability (ID) commonly co-occurs in children with autism. Although diagnostic criteria for ID require impairments in both cognitive and adaptive functioning, most population-based estimates of the frequency of co-occurring ID in children with autism-including studies of racial and ethnic disparities in co-occurring autism and ID-base the definition of ID solely on cognitive scores. The goal of this analysis was to examine the effect of including both cognitive and adaptive behavior criteria on estimates of co-occurring ID in a well-characterized sample of 2- to 5-year-old children with autism. Participants included 3264 children with research or community diagnoses of autism enrolled in the population-based Study to Explore Early Development (SEED) phases 1-3. Based only on Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) composite cognitive scores, 62.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.1, 64.7%) of children with autism were estimated to have co-occurring ID. After incorporating Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) composite or domains criteria, co-occurring ID estimates were reduced to 38.0% (95% CI: 36.2, 39.8%) and 45.0% (95% CI: 43.1, 46.9%), respectively. The increased odds of meeting ID criteria observed for non-Hispanic (NH) Black and Hispanic children relative to NH White children when only MSEL criteria were used were substantially reduced, though not eliminated, after incorporating VABS-II criteria and adjusting for selected socioeconomic variables. This study provides evidence for the importance of considering adaptive behavior as well as socioeconomic disadvantage when describing racial and ethnic disparities in co-occurring ID in epidemiologic studies of autism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定研究确定的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)病例中自身免疫性疾病的风险,基于人口的出生队列。
    方法:ASD事件病例来自31,220例基于人群的出生队列。基于DSM-IV-TR自闭症的包容性ASD定义,阿斯伯格综合症,和广泛性发育障碍,未指定,用于确定ASD病例。对于每个ASD案例,确定了2个没有ASD的年龄和性别匹配的参考对象。从出生到2017年12月之间分配的诊断代码是通过电子方式获得的。如果个体相隔30天以上有至少2个诊断代码,则将其归类为患有自身免疫性疾病。Cox比例风险模型适用于评估ASD状态和自身免疫性疾病之间的风险比(HR)。
    结果:在1014例ASD病例中,747(73.7%)为男性。50例ASD病例和59例1:2匹配的对象在14岁和17.1岁的中位年龄被诊断为首次自身免疫性疾病。分别。与匹配的参照者相比,ASD病例自身免疫性疾病的风险增加(HR1.74;95%置信区间[CI],1.21-2.52)。男性患者的风险增加具有统计学意义(HR2.01;95%CI,1.26-3.21),但女性受试者人数较少(HR1.38;95%CI,0.76-2.50)。
    结论:这项研究提供了纵向证据,ASD和自身免疫性疾病并发发生的基于人群的出生队列。因此,应监测ASD患儿的自身免疫性疾病症状,并开始适当的检查.
    Determine the risk of autoimmune disease in research-identified cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared with referents using a longitudinal, population-based birth cohort.
    ASD incident cases were identified from a population-based birth cohort of 31,220 individuals. Inclusive ASD definition based on DSM-IV-TR autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome, and pervasive developmental disorder, not otherwise specified, was used to determine ASD cases. For each ASD case, 2 age- and sex-matched referents without ASD were identified. Diagnosis codes assigned between birth and December 2017 were electronically obtained. Individuals were classified as having an autoimmune disorder if they had at least 2 diagnosis codes more than 30 days apart. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) between ASD status and autoimmune disorder.
    Of 1014 ASD cases, 747 (73.7%) were male. Fifty ASD cases and 59 of the 1:2 matched referents were diagnosed with first autoimmune disorder at the median age of 14 and 17.1 years, respectively. ASD cases had increased risk of autoimmune disease compared with matched referents (HR 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.52). The increased risk was statistically significant among male patients (HR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.21) but not among the smaller number of female subjects (HR 1.38; 95% CI, 0.76-2.50).
    This study provides evidence from a longitudinal, population-based birth cohort for co-occurrence of ASD and autoimmune disorders. Thus, children with ASD should be monitored for symptoms of autoimmune disease and appropriate workup initiated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的人呼吁神经分化人群参与神经发育状况的研究。到目前为止,然而,这往往只能通过外部患者和公众参与(PPI)小组的成员资格来实现.调节情绪-加强青少年复原力(RE-STAR)计划正在建立一种新的参与式转化研究模式,将诊断出注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症的年轻人置于研究团队的核心位置,以便他们可以为制定和实施其研究计划做出贡献。
    目标:概述RE-STAR参与模式所依据的原则,并描述其实际实施和好处,特别是关于青年研究小组(Y-RPers)成员的核心作用。
    方法:所提出的模型是24个月过程的高潮,在此期间Y-RPers从顾问转移到RE-STAR中的共同研究人员。它是由共同意愿原则塑造的。这里的说明是在学术研究人员之间进行了多次迭代的协作讨论之后达成的,Y-RPers和其他利益相关者。
    结果:基于我们的集体思考,我们提供了关于如何有效地将诊断为ADHD和/或自闭症的年轻人纳入转化研究过程的核心的一般指导。我们还描述了具体的理论,Y-RPer参与RE-STAR的方法学和分析效益。
    结论:尽管处于起步阶段,RE-STAR已经证明了该模型的潜力,以丰富翻译科学的方式,可以改变我们对自闭症之间关系的理解,ADHD与心理健康如果经过适当调整,我们相信该模型可以应用于其他类型的神经分化和/或精神健康状况。
    BACKGROUND: There are increasing calls for neurodivergent peoples\' involvement in research into neurodevelopmental conditions. So far, however, this has tended to be achieved only through membership of external patient and public involvement (PPI) panels. The Regulating Emotions - Strengthening Adolescent Resilience (RE-STAR) programme is building a new participatory model of translational research that places young people with diagnoses of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism at the heart of the research team so that they can contribute to shaping and delivering its research plan.
    OBJECTIVE: To outline the principles on which the RE-STAR participatory model is based and describe its practical implementation and benefits, especially concerning the central role of members of the Youth Researcher Panel (Y-RPers).
    METHODS: The model presented is a culmination of a 24-month process during which Y-RPers moved from advisors to co-researchers integrated within RE-STAR. It is shaped by the principles of co-intentionality. The account here was agreed following multiple iterative cycles of collaborative discussion between academic researchers, Y-RPers and other stakeholders.
    RESULTS: Based on our collective reflections we offer general guidance on how to effectively integrate young people with diagnoses of ADHD and/or autism into the core of the translational research process. We also describe the specific theoretical, methodological and analytical benefits of Y-RPer involvement in RE-STAR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although in its infancy, RE-STAR has demonstrated the model\'s potential to enrich translational science in a way that can change our understanding of the relationship between autism, ADHD and mental health. When appropriately adapted we believe the model can be applied to other types of neurodivergence and/or mental health conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:综述脂联素水平与儿童孤独症谱系障碍(ASDs)的关系。
    背景:ASD与普遍的社交互动和沟通异常有关。研究人员已经研究了ASD的各种病理生理机制,以确定早期诊断的预测因子,以优化治疗结果。免疫功能障碍,可能是由抗炎脂肪因子的减少介导的,脂联素,随着其他脂肪因子的变化,可能在增加ASD风险中起核心作用。然而,其他因素,例如母体维生素D水平低,动脉粥样硬化,糖尿病,肥胖,心脏代谢疾病,早产,和催产素基因多态性也可能导致ASD风险增加。
    方法:在数据库上搜索;PubMed,谷歌学者,和Cochrane使用关键词;脂联素,脂肪因子,ASD,自闭症,自闭症,包括直到2022年9月出版的英语语言研究。数据提取了有和没有ASD的儿童脂联素水平之间的平均差异。
    结果:搜索产生了六项研究,提供了年轻ASD患者脂联素水平的数据。从表1可以看出,六项研究中有四项对ASD和脂联素水平之间的负相关呈阳性。此外,4项阳性研究和1项阴性研究中的2项发现低脂联素水平与自闭症症状的严重程度相关。然而,一项综述研究的结果不显著.
    结论:综述的大多数研究发现ASDs患儿的脂联素水平较低,自闭症症状的严重程度也较低。
    OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between adiponectin levels and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) in children.
    BACKGROUND: ASDs are associated with pervasive social interaction and communication abnormalities. Researchers have studied various pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ASDs to identify predictors for an early diagnosis to optimize treatment outcomes. Immune dysfunction, perhaps mediated by a decrease in anti-inflammatory adipokine, adiponectin, along with changes in other adipokines, may play a central role in increasing the risk for ASDs. However, other factors, such as low maternal vitamin D levels, atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, cardio-metabolic diseases, preterm delivery, and oxytocin gene polymorphism may also contribute to increased risk for ASDs.
    METHODS: Searches on the database; PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane using keywords; adiponectin, adipokines, ASD, autism, autistic disorder, included English-language studies published till September 2022. Data were extracted on mean differences between adiponectin levels in children with and without ASDs.
    RESULTS: The search yielded six studies providing data on adiponectin levels in young patients with ASDs. As can be seen from Table 1, four of the six studies were positive for an inverse correlation between ASD and adiponectin levels. In addition, two of the four positive and one negative studies found low adiponectin levels associated with and the severity of autistic symptoms. However, results from one reviewed study were insignificant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Most studies reviewed yielded lower adiponectin levels in children with ASDs as well as the severity of autistic symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在过去的几十年中,自闭症特征与饮食失调之间的关系受到了广泛的关注。精神病理学维度方法的兴起扩大了我们对自闭症的思考方式,承认亚阈值孤独症的表现遍及普通人群,在精神病患者中更为明显。在这里,我们调查了首次转诊至精神卫生门诊的一组患者中饮食失调的患病率及其与自闭症特征和感觉敏感性的潜在关系,还没有正式的诊断.
    方法:259名年轻人(18至24岁)完成:饮食态度测试(EAT-26),瑞典自闭症谱系障碍饮食评估(SWEAA),自闭症商(AQ),Ritvo自闭症Asperger诊断量表修订版(RAADS-R),和感官感知商简表35项(SPQ-SF35)。
    结果:23.55%的参与者在EAT-26的得分高于临界值,这表明他们存在饮食失调的风险,应由专业临床医生进行评估;触摸和视觉领域的超敏反应与EAT-26和SWEAA之间出现关联;自闭症特征的存在很大程度上与饮食失调有关。
    结论:这项研究强调了饮食领域作为具有一般精神症状和心理痛苦的年轻人所经历的痛苦中的主要精神病理学特征的重要性;它为自闭症特征与饮食失调之间的关联增加了证据,并为有关阈值下自闭症特征在一般精神病理学中的作用的新研究问题打开了大门。
    方法:一级:从实验研究中获得的证据。
    OBJECTIVE: The relationship between autistic traits and eating disturbances has been given considerable attention over the last decades. The rise of a dimensional approach to psychopathology has expanded the way we think about autism, acknowledging that subthreshold autistic manifestations span across the general population and are more pronounced in psychiatric patients. Here we investigated the prevalence of eating disorders and its potential relationship with autistic traits and sensory sensitivity in a group of patients who were referred for the first time to a mental health outpatient clinic, without a formal diagnosis yet.
    METHODS: 259 young adults (between 18 and 24 years old) completed: the Eating Attitude Test (EAT-26), the Swedish Eating Assessment for Autism Spectrum Disorders (SWEAA), the Autism Quotient (AQ), the Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale-Revised (RAADS-R), and the Sensory Perception Quotient-Short Form 35 item (SPQ-SF35).
    RESULTS: 23.55% of participants scored above the cut-off at the EAT-26, suggesting that they presented a risk for eating disorders and should be assessed by a specialized clinician; associations emerged between hypersensitivity in the touch and vision domain and both the EAT-26 and the SWEAA; the presence of autistic traits was largely associated with eating disturbances.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the significance of the eating domain as a central psychopathological feature in the distress experienced by young adults with general psychiatric symptoms and psychological suffering; it adds evidence to the association between autistic traits and eating disorders and opens to new research questions about the role of subthreshold autistic traits in general psychopathology.
    METHODS: Level I: Evidence obtained from experimental studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要更好地了解整个生命过程中的自闭症,包括自闭症患者和赡养亲属的生活。作为一项涉及自闭症成年人的大型混合方法队列研究的一部分,照顾者和亲戚这项子研究只关注亲戚的经历,以便从更广泛的个人网络中了解更多关于人们生活的信息。我们的研究问题是:1.照顾和/或支持自闭症成年人的家庭成员的经历是什么,2.亲戚的观点如何增加我们对自闭症成年人经历的转变和挑战的了解,and3.哪些策略/支持对成人和亲属有帮助?
    方法:使用来自英国成人自闭症谱系队列的亲属/照顾者队列,对自闭症成人的亲属进行了有目的地抽样和招募。与16名年龄在18-57岁的自闭症成年人相关的18名年龄在31-81岁的参与者接受了24-91分钟的采访。使用反身性主题分析对访谈笔录进行了检查。
    结果:制定了两个总体主题,“家庭支持在照顾自闭症成年人方面大有帮助”和“当家庭转向社会寻求支持时”带有子主题。亲戚描述了他们获得的好处以及对自闭症成年人的钦佩。他们反思了他们如何在各种依赖背景下支持独立。他们还确定了自闭症成年人和家庭在导航支持系统(例如医疗保健和就业)方面面临的挑战。一个重要的新颖成果是倡导来自家庭以外的具有生活经验的榜样的价值。
    结论:研究结果提出了以下建议:(i)减少自闭症个人和亲属在危机时刻面临的支持障碍的策略;(ii)承认和支持使亲属和自闭症成年人能够独立运作的因素(例如资助活动,灵活就业);(iii)未来规划对话,包括能够增进知识并帮助计划自闭症成年人未来护理或支持需求的亲戚,以及(iv)榜样的机会(有生活经验的人,自闭症的成年人和亲戚)来激励他人并传播知识。
    结论:这些发现为自闭症成年人亲属的经历增加了宝贵的见解,并挑战读者对亲属可以在不同时间和不同背景下做出贡献的许多角色有更大的理解。这些观点为与自闭症成年人一起工作和计划提供的人增加了重要信息。
    BACKGROUND: There is a need to better understand autism across the life course, including the lives of both autistic people and supporting relatives. As part of a larger mixed methods cohort study involving autistic adults, carers and relatives this sub-study focused on the experiences of relatives alone to learn more about the lives of people from the wider personal networks. Our research questions were: 1. What are the experiences of family members who care for and/or support autistic adults, 2. How can the viewpoints of relatives add to what we know about transitions and challenges experienced by autistic adults, and 3. What strategies/support have been helpful for adults and relatives?
    METHODS: Relatives of autistic adults were purposively sampled and recruited using the Relatives/Carers cohort from the Adult Autism Spectrum Cohort-UK. 18 participants aged 31-81years who were related to 16 autistic adults aged 18-57years were interviewed for 24-91minutes. Interview transcripts were examined using reflexive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Two overarching themes were developed, \'Family support goes a long way in caring for autistic adults\' and \'When families turn to society for support\' with subthemes. Relatives described benefits they had gained and their admiration for autistic adults. They reflected on how they gave support for independence in various contexts of dependence. They also identified the challenges that both autistic adults and families face navigating support systems (for example for healthcare and employment). An important novel outcome was the advocated value of role-models with lived experience who come from outside of the family.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings lead to recommendations for: (i) Strategies to reduce the barriers for support that are faced by autistic individuals and relatives during crisis points; (ii) recognition and support for what enables both relatives and autistic adults to function independently (e.g. funded activities, flexible employment); (iii) future planning conversations to include relatives who can enhance knowledge and help plan for future care or support needs for autistic adults and (iv) opportunities for role models (persons with lived experience, autistic adults and relatives) to inspire others and disseminate knowledge.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings add valuable insights into the experiences of relatives of autistic adults and challenge the reader to have greater appreciation of the many roles relatives can contribute across time and in a variety of contexts. These perspectives add important information for those working with and planning provision for autistic adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床医生根据行为特征对儿童的诊断形成初步印象,但研究尚未确定具体的行为来指导最初的诊断印象。参与者是多站点早期检测研究的幼儿(N=55,平均年龄22.9个月),因筛查或父母/提供者的关注而转介给ASD。在遇见一个孩子的5分钟内,临床医生注意到ASD或非ASD印象,自信的印象,以及影响他们印象的行为。这些临床医生还确定了每个孩子的最终诊断。当儿童的最终诊断为ASD(n=35)时,高级临床医师对ASD有初步印象22例(63%),但漏诊13例(37%).当最终诊断为非ASD(n=20)时,在所有病例中,高级临床医生都对非ASD有初步印象(100%)。初级临床医生的结果相似。高级和初级临床医生使用相同的行为来形成对ASD和非ASD的准确印象:社会互惠,非语言交流,和眼神交流。高级临床医生在形成ASD和非ASD的准确印象时还使用了注意力;初级临床医生仅在形成准确的非ASD印象时才使用这种行为。临床医生对ASD的初步印象很可能与最终诊断一致,但非ASD的初步印象需要随访。表现出所有四种非典型行为的幼儿(社会互惠,非语言交流,眼神接触,和注意力集中)可能会得到加速的ASD诊断。然而,存在明显的典型行为不应排除ASD;对于一些孩子来说,有必要进行更长的评估,以允许更多的机会观察微妙的社会行为。
    Clinicians form initial impressions about a child\'s diagnosis based on behavioral features, but research has not yet identified specific behaviors to guide initial diagnostic impressions. Participants were toddlers (N = 55, mean age 22.9 months) from a multi-site early detection study, referred for concern for ASD due to screening or parent/provider concern. Within 5 min of meeting a child, clinicians noted ASD or non-ASD impression, confidence in impression, and behaviors that informed their impression. These clinicians also determined final diagnoses for each child. When a child\'s final diagnosis was ASD (n = 35), senior clinicians formed an initial impression of ASD in 22 cases (63%) but missed 13 cases (37%). When final diagnosis was non-ASD (n = 20), senior clinicians made an initial impression of non-ASD in all cases (100%). Results were similar among junior clinicians. Senior and junior clinicians used the same behaviors to form accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD: social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, and eye contact. Senior clinicians additionally used focus of attention when forming accurate impressions of ASD and non-ASD; junior clinicians used this behavior only when forming accurate non-ASD impressions. Clinicians\' initial impressions of ASD are very likely to be consistent with final diagnoses, but initial impressions of non-ASD need follow-up. Toddlers who show all four atypical behaviors (social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, eye contact, and focus of attention) might receive expedited ASD diagnoses. However, presence of apparently typical behaviors should not rule out ASD; for some children a longer evaluation is necessary to allow for more opportunities to observe subtle social behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多国家的儿童健康服务正在从单一条件诊断筒仓评估转向从更整体的意义上考虑神经发育。在评估神经发散儿童时,越来越认识到临床重叠和不同神经类型并存的重要性。使用横截面服务评估设计,我们调查了一组接受自闭症评估的儿童中神经分歧的重叠,专注于电机,学习,和注意力/活动级别域。我们的目的是确定在接受自闭症评估的队列中,有多少比例的儿童表现出额外的神经分化特征,以及进一步调查了什么比例。
    方法:我们评估了2至17岁接受自闭症评估的儿童的匿名医疗记录。我们使用经过验证的问卷来评估神经发散特征。开发了加权评分系统来确定每个神经发育领域的性状,并且认为高于中位数的得分表示神经发散性状。记录了进一步调查的证据。然后,我们研究了自闭症特征与其他神经分化特征之间的关系。
    结果:114名参与者被纳入评估。62.3%(n=71)完成问卷分析。其中,71.8%(n=51)的得分高于至少一种其他神经类型的中位数,表明存在其他神经发散特征,88.7%(n=64)的患者被诊断为自闭症。在自闭症评估之外,只有26.3%的有其他神经类型证据的儿童进行了进一步调查。
    结论:我们的结果表明,在疑似自闭症的儿童人群中,其他神经发散特征之间存在广泛的重叠,并且表明只有一小部分被进一步调查。使用标准化问卷来发现其他神经分歧可能有助于改善神经发育评估的整体性质。
    BACKGROUND: Children\'s health services in many countries are moving from single condition diagnostic silo assessments to considering neurodevelopment in a more holistic sense. There has been increasing recognition of the importance of clinical overlap and co-occurrence of different neurotypes when assessing neurodivergent children. Using a cross-sectional service evaluation design, we investigated the overlap of neurodivergences in a cohort of children referred for autism assessment, focusing on motor, learning, and attention/activity level domains. We aimed to determine what proportion of children in a cohort referred for an autism assessment showed traits of additional neurodivergences, and what proportion were further investigated.
    METHODS: We evaluated anonymised medical records of children aged between two and 17 years referred for autism assessment. We used validated questionnaires to assess for neurodivergent traits. A weighted scoring system was developed to determine traits in each neurodevelopmental domain and a score above the median was considered to indicate a neurodivergent trait. Evidence of further investigations were recorded. We then examined the relationships between autism traits and traits of additional neurodivergence.
    RESULTS: 114 participants were included for evaluation. 62.3% (n = 71) had completed questionnaires for analysis. Of these, 71.8% (n = 51) scored greater than the median for at least one additional neurotype, indicating the presence of other neurodivergent traits, and 88.7% (n = 64) attracted a diagnosis of autism. Only 26.3% of children with evidence of additional neurotypes were further investigated beyond their autism assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the extensive overlap between additional neurodivergent traits in a population of children referred with suspected autism and show that only a small proportion were further investigated. The use of standardised questionnaires to uncover additional neurodivergences may have utility in improving the holistic nature of neurodevelopmental assessments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自闭症的核心特征涉及难以将眼睛注视变化感知和解释为非语言交流信号。关于这种表型起源的假设是,它来自发育上不同的社会视觉注意力(SVA)。我们为自闭症青少年开发了社交游戏(SAGA;Scherf等人。BMJOpen8(9):e023682,2018)作为自闭症患者的严肃游戏干预,以发现眼睛凝视线索的重要性。以前,我们证明了SAGA在改善自闭症青少年对眼睛注视线索和社交技能的感知和理解方面的有效性(Griffinetal.JCPPAdv1(3):e12041,2021)。这里,我们确定对面部和/或目标注视对象的社会视觉注意力是否增加,在同一研究样本中的同一凝视感知任务期间通过眼动跟踪测量,缓和了这种改善。与预测相反,对于治疗组,面部的SVA没有差异增加。相反,随着时间的推移,两组的SVA都有小幅增加。第二,在SAGA干预之前,对面部的关注无法预测治疗组和标准护理对照组在凝视感知任务中的表现。然而,在测试后,治疗组的自闭症青少年更有可能识别定向凝视的对象,当他们关注面部和目标对象的时间更长时。重要的是,这是第一项通过眼动追踪测量社会视觉注意力作为自闭症RCT治疗反应的研究.NCT02968225。
    A core feature of autism involves difficulty perceiving and interpreting eye gaze shifts as nonverbal communicative signals. A hypothesis about the origins of this phenotype is that it emerges from developmentally different social visual attention (SVA). We developed Social Games for Autistic Adolescents (SAGA; Scherf et al. BMJ Open 8(9):e023682, 2018) as a serious game intervention for autistic individuals to discover the significance of eye gaze cues. Previously, we demonstrated the effectiveness of SAGA to improve the perception and understanding of eye gaze cues and social skills for autistic adolescents (Griffin et al. JCPP Adv 1(3):e12041, 2021). Here, we determine whether increases in social visual attention to faces and/or target gazed-at objects, as measured via eye tracking during the same Gaze Perception task in the same study sample, moderated this improvement. In contrast to predictions, SVA to faces did not differentially increase for the treatment group. Instead, both groups evinced a small increase in SVA to faces over time. Second, Prior to the SAGA intervention, attention to faces failed to predict performance in the Gaze Perception task for both the treatment and standard care control groups. However, at post-test, autistic adolescents in the treatment group were more likely to identify the object of directed gaze when they attended longer to faces and longer to target objects. Importantly, this is the first study to measure social visual attention via eye tracking as a treatment response in an RCT for autism. NCT02968225.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号