■步行是一种至关重要的活动,在患有神经病的个体中经常受到损害。Charcot-Marie-Tooth(CMT)疾病和脑瘫(CP)是两种常见的影响步态的神经发育障碍,容易跌倒的危险。由于指导科学证据有限,迫切需要更好地了解手术矫正如何影响活动性,平衡信心,和步态相比踝足矫形器(AFO)支架。系统的方法将使严格的合作研究能够推进临床护理。
■此愿景的关键要素包括1)在选定的患者队列中进行前瞻性研究,以系统地比较保守性与手术管理,2)客观的基于实验室的患者流动性评估,balance,和步态使用可靠的方法,和3)使用与健康和流动性相关的以患者为中心的结果测量。
■文献中已经描述了有效且可靠的身体移动性和平衡置信度的标准化测试。它们包括1)四方阶跃测试,一种广泛使用的平衡和敏捷性测试,可以预测跌倒风险,2)自选步行速度,一种能够检测矫形器使用时功能变化的总体移动性度量,和3)活动特定平衡置信度量表,一种评估个人在活动期间平衡信心水平的调查工具。此外,运动捕获和地面反作用力数据可用于评估全身运动和载荷,在步态摆动阶段,包括脚趾间隙在内的有区别的生物力学措施,50%摆动时的足底弯曲,踝关节足底屈肌峰值力矩,和峰值脚踝推脱力。
■在这些具有挑战性的患者群体中,支持循证实践和告知临床决策所需的工具都是可用的。现在必须进行研究,以更好地了解在患有神经病的个体步态期间的移动性和平衡的背景下使用AFO的潜在益处和局限性。特别是相对于那些通过手术矫正提供。
■遵循这一研究路径将提供流动性的比较基线数据,平衡信心,和步态,可用于告知基于客观标准的AFO处方方法和手术干预的影响。
UNASSIGNED: Walking is a vital activity often compromised in individuals with neuropathic conditions. Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease and Cerebral Palsy (CP) are two common neurodevelopmental disabilities affecting gait, predisposing to the risk of falls. With guiding scientific evidence limited, there is a critical need to better understand how surgical correction affects mobility, balance confidence, and gait compared to ankle foot orthosis (AFO) bracing. A systematic approach will enable rigorous collaborative research to advance clinical care.
UNASSIGNED: Key elements of this vision include 1) prospective studies in select patient cohorts to systematically compare conservative vs. surgical management, 2) objective laboratory-based evaluation of patient mobility, balance, and gait using reliable methods, and 3) use of patient-centric outcome measures related to health and mobility.
UNASSIGNED: Valid and reliable standardized tests of physical mobility and balance confidence have been described in the literature. They include 1) the four-square step test, a widely used test of balance and agility that predicts fall risk, 2) the self-selected walking velocity, a measure of general mobility able to detect function change with orthosis use, and 3) the activity specific balance confidence scale, a survey instrument that assesses an individual\'s level of balance confidence during activity. Additionally, motion capture and ground reaction force data can be used to evaluate whole-body motion and loading, with discriminative biomechanical measures including toe clearance during the swing phase of gait, plantarflexion at 50% of swing, peak ankle plantarflexor moment, and peak ankle push-off power.
UNASSIGNED: The tools needed to support evidence-based practice and inform clinical decision making in these challenging patient populations are all available. Research must now be conducted to better understand the potential benefits and limitations of AFO use in the context of mobility and balance during gait for individuals with neuropathic conditions, particularly relative to those offered by surgical correction.
UNASSIGNED: Following this path of research will provide comparative baseline data on mobility, balance confidence, and gait that can be used to inform an objective criterion-based approach to AFO prescription and the impact of surgical intervention.