Cervical Vertebrae

颈椎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:侧块螺钉固定是C3和C6颈椎后路融合的标准。传统轨迹稳定但有风险,包括神经根和椎动脉损伤.微创脊柱手术(MISS)越来越受欢迎,但是轨迹带来了解剖学上的挑战。
    目的:这项研究提出了一种新颖的关节间螺钉轨迹来解决这些问题并增强颈椎椎弓根螺钉的在线器械。
    方法:回顾性分析重新格式化的宫颈CT扫描包括10例患者。在80个节段(C3-C6)上进行了关节间壁形态的测量。评估了两个关节间螺钉轨迹:轨迹A(上部外象限进入,水平轨迹)和轨迹B(下部外象限入口,头颅指向的轨迹)。将这些与标准侧块和颈椎椎弓根螺钉轨迹进行比较,评估螺钉长度,angles,以及椎管和横孔的潜在风险。
    结果:与轨迹A(12.51±0.24mm;p<0.01)相比,轨迹B显示出明显更长的pars长度(15.69±0.65mm)。横向质量螺钉长度与使用轨迹B的关节间螺钉长度相当。两个轨迹都提供了安全的角度范围。将精致结构的风险降至最低。
    结论:和结论。关节间螺钉为颈椎后路融合侧块螺钉提供了可行的替代方案,尤其是在MISS环境中。轨迹B,特别是,提出了一个可行和安全的替代方案,降低椎动脉和脊髓损伤的风险。术前评估和术中技术对于成功实施至关重要。在临床应用之前需要生物力学验证。
    BACKGROUND: Lateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior cervical fusion between C3 and C6. Traditional trajectories stabilize but carry risks, including nerve root and vertebral artery injuries. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is gaining popularity, but trajectories present anatomical challenges.
    OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a novel pars interarticularis screw trajectory to address these issues and enhance in-line instrumentation with cervical pedicle screws.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of reformatted cervical CT scans included 10 patients. Measurements of the pars interarticularis morphology were performed on 80 segments (C3-C6). Two pars interarticularis screw trajectories were evaluated: Trajectory A (upper outer quadrant entry, horizontal trajectory) and Trajectory B (lower outer quadrant entry, cranially pointed trajectory). These were compared to standard lateral mass and cervical pedicle screw trajectories, assessing screw lengths, angles, and potential risks to the spinal canal and transverse foramen.
    RESULTS: Trajectory B showed significantly longer pars lengths (15.69 ± 0.65 mm) compared to Trajectory A (12.51 ± 0.24 mm; p < 0.01). Lateral mass screw lengths were comparable to pars interarticularis screw lengths using Trajectory B. Both trajectories provided safe angular ranges, minimizing the risk to delicate structures.
    CONCLUSIONS: and Conclusion. Pars interarticularis screws offer a viable alternative to lateral mass screws for posterior cervical fusion, especially in MISS contexts. Trajectory B, in particular, presents a feasible and safe alternative, reducing the risk of vertebral artery and spinal cord injury. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative technologies are essential for successful implementation. Biomechanical validation is needed before clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以一种新的手术策略来介绍我们在完全硬膜外哑铃型脊髓神经鞘瘤的手术治疗中的经验。
    方法:本研究是在USTC附属第一医院神经外科治疗的一系列病例,2018年1月至2021年6月。
    结果:24例患者符合纳入标准,颈椎和腰椎是最常见的位置。所有患者均行手术治疗。所有患者均完成了全切除。2例出现麻木,无1例出现运动障碍。术后无脑脊液漏或伤口感染。
    结论:基于有限数量的观察,我们的结论是,我们的技术是可行的,有效的治疗硬膜外哑铃型脊髓神经鞘瘤。
    背景:http://www.chictr.org.cn/,不。ChiCTR2400086171。
    OBJECTIVE: To present our experience in the surgical management of completely extradural dumbbell spinal schwannomas with a new surgical strategy.
    METHODS: This study is a case series of patients treated at the Neurosurgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, between January 2018 and June 2021.
    RESULTS: 24 patients met the inclusion criteria, with cervical and lumbar spines being the most frequent locations. All patients underwent surgical treatment. Total gross resection was accomplished in all patients. Two cases had numbness and no case exhibited motor deficit. There was no postoperative CSF leakage or wound infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on a limited number of observations, we conclude that our technique was feasible and effective for the treatment of extradural dumbbell spinal schwannomas.
    BACKGROUND: http://www.chictr.org.cn/ , No. ChiCTR2400086171.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是最常见的脊柱手术之一,对于手术后是否需要处方颈椎支具,目前尚无共识.这项研究旨在调查在单层或双层ACDF后佩戴或不佩戴宫颈支具时的放射学和临床结果的任何差异。我们检查了2组接受单层或双层ACDF手术的患者,有和没有颈椎支架:在2018年3月至2019年12月期间接受ACDF的患者接受了颈椎支架,而在2020年1月至2021年5月期间接受ACDF的患者没有接受ACDF。每位患者均使用X线平片进行放射学和功能评估,修改后的日本骨科协会评分,颈部和手臂的视觉模拟量表,直到手术后12个月。融合率,沉降,术后并发症也进行了评估.83例患者被纳入分析:38例被支撑,45例未被支撑。两组的人口统计学特征和基线结局指标相似。基线时的任何临床测量均无统计学意义的差异。在所有时间间隔,两组的改良日本骨科协会评分和颈部和手臂视觉模拟量表均相似,与术前评分相比,具有统计学上的显着改善。此外,融合率,沉降,两组术后并发症相似。我们的结果表明,使用宫颈支架并不能改善接受单或双水平ACDF的患者的临床结局。
    Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal surgeries, there is no consensus regarding the necessity of prescribing a cervical brace after surgery. This study aimed to investigate any difference in radiological and clinical outcomes when wearing or not wearing cervical braces after single- or double-level ACDF. We examined 2 cohorts of patients who underwent single- or double-level ACDF surgery with and without a cervical brace: patients who underwent ACDF between March 2018 and December 2019 received a cervical brace, while patients who underwent ACDF between January 2020 and May 2021 did not. Each patient was evaluated radiologically and functionally using plain X-ray, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck and arm until 12 months after surgery. Fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were also evaluated. Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis: 38 were braced and 45 were not. The demographic characteristics and baseline outcome measures of both groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the clinical measures at baseline. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score and visual analog scale for neck and arm were similar in both groups at all time intervals and showed statistically significant improvement when compared with preoperative scores. In addition, fusion rate, subsidence, and postoperative complications were similar in both groups. Our results suggest that the use of cervical braces does not improve the clinical outcomes of individuals undergoing single- or double-level ACDF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经常报道颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后患者的神经功能恢复不良;然而,尚无研究分析患者术前影像学特征以探讨影响手术预后的因素。目的探讨影响患者术前影像学特点的因素及其对颈前路髓核摘除融合术后神经功能恢复不良的影响。
    方法:我们回顾性分析89例符合颈前路髓核摘除融合术治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的患者的临床资料,并根据最终随访时日本骨科协会(JOA)评分的恢复率对患者的神经功能恢复情况进行评价。根据JOA恢复率≥50%和<50%,将患者分为“好”和“差”组。分别。临床信息(年龄,性别,身体质量指数,症状持续时间,术前JOA评分,和最终随访时的JOA评分)和影像学特征(颈椎后凸畸形,颈椎不稳,后纵韧带骨化(OPLL),椎间盘突出钙化,T2加权成像(T2WI)上脊髓信号强度(ISI)增加,从患者中收集与融合水平(颅骨和尾骨)相邻的椎间盘的退变程度。进行了单变量和二元逻辑回归分析,以确定神经系统恢复不良的危险因素。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为52.56±11.18岁,平均随访26.89±11.14个月。20例(22.5%)患者的神经系统恢复不良。单因素分析显示神经功能恢复不良的显著预测因素是年龄(p=0.019),伴随OPLL(p=0.019),伴随钙化的椎间盘突出(p=0.019),脊髓在T2WI上的ISI(p<0.05),颅骨邻近水平的椎间盘退化程度很高(p<0.05),和尾部相邻水平的高等级椎间盘(p<0.05)。二分类logistic回归分析显示,T2WI上脊髓ISI(p=0.001OR=24.947)和颅侧邻近椎间盘高度退变(p=0.040OR=6.260)是神经系统预后不良的独立危险因素。
    结论:T2WI脊髓ISI及颅旁椎间盘高度退变是颈前路椎间盘切除融合术后神经功能恢复不良的独立危险因素。对患者术前影像学特征的综合分析可以帮助制定手术方案和管理患者的手术期望。
    BACKGROUND: Poor neurological recovery in patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been frequently reported; however, no study has analyzed the preoperative imaging characteristics of patients to investigate the factors affecting surgical prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that affect the preoperative imaging characteristics of patients and their influence on poor neurologic recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who met the criteria for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and evaluated the patients\' neurological recovery based on the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores at the time of the final follow-up visit. Patients were categorized into the \"good\" and \"poor\" groups based on the JOA recovery rates of ≥ 50% and < 50%, respectively. Clinical information (age, gender, body mass index, duration of symptoms, preoperative JOA score, and JOA score at the final follow-up) and imaging characteristics (cervical kyphosis, cervical instability, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), calcification of herniated intervertebral discs, increased signal intensity (ISI) of the spinal cord on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and degree of degeneration of the discs adjacent to the fused levels (cranial and caudal) were collected from the patients. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for poor neurologic recovery.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 52.56 ± 11.18 years, and the mean follow-up was 26.89 ± 11.14 months. Twenty patients (22.5%) had poor neurological recovery. Univariate analysis showed that significant predictors of poor neurological recovery were age (p = 0.019), concomitant OPLL (p = 0.019), concomitant calcification of herniated intervertebral discs (p = 0.019), ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI (p <0.05), a high grade of degeneration of the discs of the cranial neighboring levels (p <0.05), and a high grade of discs of the caudal neighboring levels (p <0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI (p = 0.001 OR = 24.947) and high degree of degeneration of adjacent discs on the cranial side (p = 0.040 OR = 6.260) were independent risk factors for poor neurological prognosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: ISI of the spinal cord on T2WI and high degree of cranial adjacent disc degeneration are independent risk factors for poor neurological recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A comprehensive analysis of the patients\' preoperative imaging characteristics can help in the development of surgical protocols and the management of patients\' surgical expectations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨颈椎间盘退变与椎旁肌退变的关系[多裂(MF),颈半椎肌(SCer),半壁肌炎(SCap)和脾炎(SPL)]。
    随机选择82例慢性颈痛患者,包括43名男性和39名女性,50.730.7.51岁。所有患者均经3.0TMRIPhilipsIngenia进行常规MRI序列扫描和脂肪测量序列mDIXON-Quant宫颈扫描。颈椎旁肌肉的脂肪浸润(FI)和横截面积(CSA)(MF,SCer,通过飞利浦3.0TMRI图像后处理工作站测量C5-6椎间盘中央水平的SCap和SPL)。根据Pfirrmann分级系统,在纳入的病例中没有一级。IIrIV级病例数分别为n=16、40、19和7。采用t检验或单向方差分析比较颈椎旁肌的CSA和FI。采用Spearman相关分析评价年龄、椎间盘退变,CSA,颈椎旁肌肉的FI,采用多元线性回归分析CSA和FI的独立影响因素。
    男性患者颈椎旁肌肉的CSA明显高于女性患者(均P<0.001),但FI差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。年龄与MF+SCer的CSA弱相关,与SCap和SPL的CSA呈中度相关(r=-0.256,-0.355和-0.361,P<0.05),与SCap和SPL的FI弱相关(r=0.182和0.264,P<0.001),与MF+SCer的FI呈中度相关(r=0.408,P<0.001)。椎间盘退变的FI差异有统计学意义(P<0.001,P=0.028和P=0.005)。进一步的相关分析显示,椎间盘退变与MF+SCer的FI密切相关(r=0.629,P<0.001)。与SCap和SPL的FI呈中度相关(r=0.363,P=0.001;r=0.345,P=0.002)。多元线性回归分析显示,性别和年龄是SCap和SPLCSA的影响因素,性别是MF+SCerCSA的独立影响因素,椎间盘退变是FI的独立影响因素。
    年龄与CSA呈负相关,与FI呈正相关。椎间盘退变与椎旁肌FI相关,特别是MF和SCer的FI。性别和年龄是CSA的影响因素,椎间盘退变是FI的独立影响因素。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the relationship between degeneration of cervical intervertebral disc and degeneration of paravertebral muscles[multifidus (MF), cervical semispinalis (SCer), semispinalis capitis (SCap) and splenius capitis (SPL)].
    UNASSIGNED: 82 patients with chronic neck pain were randomly selected, including 43 males and 39 females, with 50.73 0.7.51 years old. All patients were scanned by 3.0T MRI Philips Ingenia performed conventional MRI sequence scanning and fat measurement sequence mDIXON-Quant scanning of cervical. Fat infiltration (FI) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of cervical paravertebral muscle (MF, SCer, SCap and SPL) at central level of C5-6 disc were measured by Philips 3.0T MRI image post-processing workstation. According to Pfirrmann grading system, there was no grade I in the included cases. The number of grade IIr IV cases were n=16, 40, 19 and 7 respectively. CSA and FI of cervical paravertebral muscles were compared with t test or one-way ANOVA, Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between age, disc degeneration, and CSA, FI of cervical paravertebral muscles, and multiple linear regression analysis was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of CSA and FI.
    UNASSIGNED: CSA of cervical paravertebral muscles in male patients was significantly higher than that in female patients (all P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in FI (all P>0.05). Age was weakly correlated with CSA of MF+SCer, moderately correlated with CSA of SCap and SPL (r=-0.256, -0.355 and -0.361, P<0.05), weakly correlated with FI of SCap and SPL (r= 0.182 and 0.264, P<0.001), moderately correlated with FI of MF+SCer (r=0.408, P<0.001). There were significant differences in FI with disc degeneration (P<0.001, P=0.028 and P=0.005). Further correlation analysis showed that disc degeneration was strongly correlated with FI of MF+SCer (r=0.629, P<0.001), and moderately correlated with FI of SCap and SPL (r=0.363, P=0.001; r=0.345, P=0.002). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex and age were the influencing factors of CSA of SCap and SPL, sex was the independent influencing factor of CSA of MF+SCer, and disc degeneration was the independent influencing factor of FI.
    UNASSIGNED: Age is negatively correlated with CSA and positively correlated with FI. Disc degeneration was correlated with FI of paravertebral muscles, especially with FI of MF and SCer. Sex and age were the influencing factors of CSA, while disc degeneration was the independent influencing factor of FI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是比较C3-6单侧开门式椎管成形术中替代水平(C4和C6)和所有水平微型钢板固定之间的放射学和临床结果。
    方法:本研究回顾了2014年9月至2019年9月接受C3-6单侧开式椎板成形术(A组54例)或所有水平微型钢板固定(B组42例)的96例患者。评估放射学和临床结果。临床结果包括轴向颈部疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分。影像学检查结果包括颈椎活动范围(ROM),颈椎曲度指数(CCI),和椎管扩张参数,包括开放角,前后径(APD),和巴甫洛夫的比率。
    结果:VAS没有显着差异,JOA得分,ROM,两组之间的CCI。两组术后管段扩张情况无明显差异。然而,开角,APD,A组的巴甫洛夫比率在随访期间显著下降。B组,APD,巴甫洛夫的比率,并保持开放角度,直到最后的随访。随访期间两组均未发生硬件故障或椎板重合闸。B组的平均费用高于A组。
    结论:尽管在维持运河扩张方面存在差异,在C3-6单侧开门式椎管成形术中,交替水平微型钢板固定可获得与所有水平微型钢板固定相似的临床结局.正如这项研究所证明的那样,我们认为C3-6椎板成形术交替水平(C4和C6)微型钢板固定是一种经济的,有效,和安全的治疗方法。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare radiological and clinical outcomes between alternate levels (C4 and C6) and all levels mini-plate fixation in C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty.
    METHODS: Ninety-six patients who underwent C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternate levels mini-plate fixation (54 patients in group A) or all levels mini-plate fixation (42 patients in group B) between September 2014 and September 2019 were reviewed in this study. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Clinical results included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of axial neck pain and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Radiographic results included cervical range of motion (ROM), cervical curvature index (CCI), and the spinal canal expansive parameters including open angle, anteroposterior diameter (APD), and Pavlov`s ratio.
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS, JOA score, ROM, and CCI between two groups. There was no significant difference in canal expansion postoperatively between two groups. However, open angle, APD, and Pavlov`s ratio in group A decreased significantly during the follow-up. In group B, APD, Pavlov`s ratio, and open angle were maintained until the final follow-up. There was no hardware failure or lamina reclosure occurred in both groups during the follow-up. The mean cost of group B was higher than that of group A.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in the maintenance of canal expansion, alternate levels mini-plate fixation can achieve similar clinical outcomes as all levels mini-plate fixation in C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty. As evidenced in this study, we believe C3-6 laminoplasty with alternate levels (C4 and C6) mini-plate fixation is an economical, effective, and safe treatment method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)和颈椎前路椎体切除术和融合术(ACCF)都是治疗颈椎下病变的常见外科手术。虽然最近的评论表明,与ACDF相比,ACCF提供了更好的解压缩结果,该手术与手术风险增加有关.尽管如此,ACCF在创伤性背景下的使用描述不佳.这项研究的目的是评估ACCF与更常见的ACDF相比的安全性。
    方法:所有接受ACCF或ACDF治疗超过2个椎间盘间隙和3个椎体水平的颈椎下损伤的患者,2006年至2018年,在研究中心,有资格列入。根据年龄和术前ASIA评分对患者进行匹配。
    结果:匹配后,60例患者纳入匹配分析,其中30接受了ACDF和ACCF,分别。椎体损伤在ACCF组中更为常见(p=0.002),而创伤性椎间盘破裂在ACDF组更为常见(p=0.032)。手术并发症发生率差异无统计学意义,包括植入失败,伤口感染,吞咽困难,组间脑脊液渗漏(p≥0.05)。翻修手术率(p>0.999),死亡率(p=0.222),和长期ASIA评分(p=0.081)也相似。
    结论:不匹配和匹配分析的结果表明,与ACDF相比,ACCF具有可比的结果,并且没有额外的风险。因此,这是一种安全的方法,对于患有广泛的前柱损伤的患者应考虑。
    BACKGROUND: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) are both common surgical procedures in the management of pathologies of the subaxial cervical spine. While recent reviews have demonstrated ACCF to provide better decompression results compared to ACDF, the procedure has been associated with increased surgical risks. Nonetheless, the use of ACCF in a traumatic context has been poorly described. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of ACCF as compared to the more commonly performed ACDF.
    METHODS: All patients undergoing ACCF or ACDF for subaxial cervical spine injuries spanning over 2 disc-spaces and 3 vertebral-levels, between 2006 and 2018, at the study center, were eligible for inclusion. Patients were matched based on age and preoperative ASIA score.
    RESULTS: After matching, 60 patients were included in the matched analysis, where 30 underwent ACDF and ACCF, respectively. Vertebral body injury was significantly more common in the ACCF group (p = 0.002), while traumatic disc rupture was more frequent in the ACDF group (p = 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of surgical complications, including implant failure, wound infection, dysphagia, CSF leakage between the groups (p ≥ 0.05). The rates of revision surgeries (p > 0.999), mortality (p = 0.222), and long-term ASIA scores (p = 0.081) were also similar.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results of both unmatched and matched analyses indicate that ACCF has comparable outcomes and no additional risks compared to ACDF. It is thus a safe approach and should be considered for patients with extensive anterior column injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价C2肌保存效果及C2椎板成形术后的影像学和临床疗效。
    方法:纳入14例连续接受C1-2级左右C2椎板成形术的患者。为了评估肌肉保存效果,作者对手术侧和非手术侧之间的伸肌进行了形态学测量。两名外科医生在手术前后测量了下丘脑(OCI)和宫颈半肌(SSC)肌肉的横截面积(CSA),以确定萎缩率(ARs)。此外,我们检查了运动范围(ROM),矢状垂直轴(SVA),颈部视觉模拟量表(VAS),颈部残疾指数(NDI)和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,以评估颈椎后路手术后排列的潜在变化和随后的临床结局。
    结果:我们在手术前测量了OCI和SSC的CSA,术后6个月和12个月。基于这些测量,非手术SSC的AR为0.1%±8.5%,手术OCI的AR为2.0%±7.2%,术后12个月,非手术OCI的AR为-0.7%±5.1%。然而,手术侧SSC的AR为11.2%±12.5%,这是一个相对较高的值比其他测量。尽管操作侧的SSC出现了萎缩性变化,在SVA中没有观察到显著的变化,C0-2ROM,术前和术后12个月测量之间的C2-7ROM,11.8±10.9毫米,16.3°±5.9°,术前48.7°±7.7°,14.1±11.6mm,16.1°±7.2°,术后12个月为44.0°±10.3°,分别。VAS中也注意到了改进,NDI,术后JOA评分为77.3%±29.6%。
    结论:C2椎板成形术可能是解决上颈椎周围病变的有用工具,可能减轻肌肉萎缩和减少术后颈部疼痛,同时保持矢状对齐和ROM。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate C2 muscle preservation effect and the radiological and clinical outcomes after C2 recapping laminoplasty.
    METHODS: Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent C2 recapping laminoplasty around C1-2 level were enrolled. To evaluate muscle preservation effect, the authors conducted a morphological measurement of extensor muscles between the operated and nonoperated side. Two surgeons measured the cross-sectional area (CSA) of obliquus capitis inferior (OCI) and semispinalis cervicis (SSC) muscle before and after surgery to determine atrophy rates (ARs). Additionally, we examined range of motion (ROM), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), neck visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score to assess potential changes in alignment and consequent clinical outcomes following posterior cervical surgery.
    RESULTS: We measured the CSA of OCI and SSC before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Based on these measurements, the AR of the nonoperated SSC was 0.1% ± 8.5%, the AR of the operated OCI was 2.0% ± 7.2%, and the AR of the nonoperated OCI was -0.7% ± 5.1% at the 12 months after surgery. However, the AR of the operated side\'s SSC was 11.2% ± 12.5%, which is a relatively higher value than other measurements. Despite the atrophic change of SSC on the operated side, there were no prominent changes observed in SVA, C0-2 ROM, and C2-7 ROM between preoperative and 12 months postoperative measurements, which were 11.8 ± 10.9 mm, 16.3° ± 5.9°, and 48.7° ± 7.7° preoperatively, and 14.1 ± 11.6 mm, 16.1° ± 7.2°, and 44.0° ± 10.3° at 12 months postoperative, respectively. Improvement was also noted in VAS, NDI, and JOA scores after surgery with JOA recovery rate of 77.3% ± 29.6%.
    CONCLUSIONS: C2 recapping laminoplasty could be a useful tool for addressing pathologies around the upper cervical spine, potentially mitigating muscle atrophy and reducing postoperative neck pain, while maintaining sagittal alignment and ROM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈硬膜外阻滞(CEB)是治疗颈神经根疼痛的有效干预措施。本研究旨在调查韩国执行CEB的现状。
    韩国疼痛协会附属的疼痛医生被要求在2022年9月至10月之间完成有关CEB的匿名问卷。问卷包括24个问题,详细评估了行政首长协调会的现状和方法。
    在收集的198项调查中,171名医生(86.4%)报告执行CEB。其中,大多数(94.7%)在手术过程中使用荧光镜检查.板间参数正中(IL)方法是最优选的方法(50.3%)。进行透视引导的ILCEB的受访者根据临床经验分为两组:经验≤10年(≤10年组,n=91)和具有>10年经验的人(>10年小组,n=71)。≤10年组和>10年组获得知情同意的医师比例分别为50.5%和56.3%,分别。在ILCEB期间进入硬膜外腔时,对侧斜视是两组中第二常用的视图(≤10年组,42.9%;>10年组,29.6%)。针对上宫颈病变(C3-4),在≤10年组中,IL篇幅高于C6-7的受访者比例为17.6%,在>10年组中,IL篇幅高于C6-7的受访者比例为29.5%.
    这项研究证明了韩国疼痛医生使用的CEB技术的可变性。调查结果强调了对知情同意和技术进行教育以提高安全性的必要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical epidural block (CEB) is an effective intervention for managing cervical radicular pain. This study aimed to investigate the current status of performing CEB in South Korea.
    UNASSIGNED: Pain physicians affiliated with the Korean Pain Society were asked to complete anonymous questionnaires regarding CEB between September and October 2022. The questionnaire consisted of 24 questions assessing the current status and methods of CEB in detail.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 198 surveys collected, 171 physicians (86.4%) reported performing CEB. Among those, the majority (94.7%) used fluoroscopy during the procedure. The paramedian interlaminar (IL) approach was the most preferred method (50.3%). Respondents performing fluoroscopic-guided IL CEB were categorized into two groups based on clinical experience: those with ≤10 years of experience (≤10-year group, n = 91) and those with >10 years of experience (>10-year group, n = 71). The proportion of physicians obtaining informed consent in the ≤10-year group and >10-year group was 50.5% and 56.3%, respectively. When entering the epidural space during IL CEB, the contralateral oblique view was the second most frequently used in both groups (≤10-year group, 42.9%; >10-year group, 29.6%). In targeting the upper cervical lesions (C3-4), the proportion of respondents who used an IL space higher than C6-7 was 17.6% in the ≤10-year group and 29.5% in the >10-year experience group.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated variability in the CEB technique used by pain physicians in South Korea. The findings highlight the need for education on informed consent and techniques to enhance safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈脊髓布鲁氏菌病的发病率很低,只有少数病例报告发表,和病例系列在医学文献中没有广泛报道。因此,临床特征,管理,和颈脊髓布鲁氏菌病的结果相对未知。在这个系列中,作者报告了15例颈脊髓布鲁氏菌病患者,包括临床特征,影像学发现,管理计划,该机构的经验,术后1年的结果。
    方法:该研究回顾了15例接受抗菌药物治疗的患者的临床和影像学记录,颈前路清创融合术治疗颈脊髓布鲁氏菌病。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征,脊髓水平受影响,脓肿,神经学,病理报告,抗菌方案的持续时间和类型,骨科管理的细节,以及手术过程中出现的并发症。
    结果:颈部疼痛(100%)和肢体麻痹(86.7%)是最常见的临床表现,疾病进展迅速。C6-7段是最常见的影响段,其次是C4-5和C5-6。影像学通常显示硬膜外或椎旁脓肿(80%)。VAS有了很大的改进,JOA,手术后三个月的NDI评分,分数继续提高,直到最后的随访。术前、术后评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月ESR和CRP水平恢复正常,为7.7±4.5mm/h和7.55±3.48mg/L,分别。术前、术后水平差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。脓液或病变组织细菌培养检测阳性率仅为40%,但是血液培养显示出更低的阳性率(33.3%)。抗菌药物治疗方案的平均持续时间为6.1±1.9个月。所有患者在术后8个月(4.8±1.4个月)内实现椎间植骨融合,均治愈,无复发。
    结论:脊柱布鲁氏菌病很少影响宫颈区域,但它的影响是更危险的,因为潜在的并发症,如截瘫或四肢瘫痪引起的硬膜外脓肿压迫脊髓。外科清创术,除了必要的抗菌治疗,是一种有效的策略,可以导致满意的预后治疗颈脊髓布鲁氏菌病。
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of cervical spinal brucellosis is low, only a few case reports have been published, and case series are not widely reported in the medical literature. Therefore, clinical features, management, and outcomes of cervical spinal brucellosis are relatively unknown. In this series, the authors report 15 cases of patients with cervical spinal brucellosis, including clinical characteristic, imaging findings, management plans, the institution\'s experience, and outcomes at 1 year postoperatively.
    METHODS: The study reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 15 patients who received antimicrobial pharmacotherapy, and anterior cervical debridement and fusion for cervical spinal brucellosis. The data collected included patient demographic characteristics, spinal level affected, abscess, neurology, pathological reports, duration and type of antimicrobial regimens, details of orthopedic management, and complications incurred during the procedure.
    RESULTS: Neck pain (100%) and limb paralysis (86.7%) were the most common clinical presentations, and the disease had a rapid progression. The C6-7 segment was the most commonly affected segment, followed by C4-5 and C5-6. Imaging commonly revealed epidural or paravertebral abscesses (80%). There was a significant improvement in the VAS, JOA, and NDI scores three months after surgery, and the scores continued to improve until the final follow-up. There was a statistically significant difference between the pre- and postoperative scores (P < 0.05). The ESR and CRP levels returned to normal within three months postoperatively, being 7.7 ± 4.5 mm/h and 7.55 ± 3.48 mg/L, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the pre- and postoperative levels (P < 0.05). The positive rate of bacterial culture testing of pus or lesion tissues was only 40%, but blood cultures revealed an even lower positivity rate (33.3%). The average antimicrobial pharmacotherapy regimen duration was 6.1 ± 1.9 months. All patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion within 8 months (4.8 ± 1.4 months) after surgery and were cured with non-recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Spinal brucellosis rarely affects the cervical region, but its impact is more dangerous due to potential complications such as paraplegia or tetraplegia arising from epidural abscesses that compress the spinal cord. Surgical debridement, along with essential antimicrobial therapy, is an effective strategy and can lead to satisfactory prognosis in managing cervical spinal brucellosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号