BACKGROUND: In recent years, the zero-profile implant (Zero-p) has emerged as a promising internal fixation technique. Although studies have indicated its potential superiority over conventional cage-plate implant (Cage-plate) in the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis, there remains a lack of definitive comparative reports regarding its indications, safety, and efficacy.
METHODS: A computerized search was conducted on English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP. Additionally, a manual search was meticulously carried out on Chinese medical journals, spanning from the inception of the respective databases until August 2023. The meta-analysis utilized a case-control study approach and was executed through the utilization of RevMan 5.3 software. Stringent quality evaluation and data extraction procedures were implemented to guarantee the reliability and validity of the findings.
RESULTS: Nine high-quality studies with 808 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the operation time (MD = - 13.28; 95% CI (- 17.53, - 9.04), P < 0.00001), intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 6.61; 95% CI (- 10.47, - 2.75), P = 0.0008), incidence of postoperative dysphagia at various time points: within the first month after surgery (OR = 0.36; 95% CI (0.22, 0.58), P < 0.0001), 1-3 months after surgery (OR = 0.20; 95% CI (0.08, 0.49), P = 0.0004), the final follow-up (OR = 0.21; 95% CI (0.05, 0.83), P = 0.003) and the rate of postoperative adjacent disc degeneration (OR = 0.46; 95% CI (0.25, 0.84), P = 0.01) were significantly lower in the Zero-p group than in the Cage-plate group. Additionally, was also significantly lower in the Zero-p group. However, there were no significant differences in the JOA score, the final follow-up NDI score, surgical segmental fusion rate, postoperative height of adjacent vertebrae, or postoperative subsidence rate between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, when treating single-segment degenerative cervical spondylosis, both internal fixation techniques are reliable and effective. However, Zero-P  implant offer several advantages over cage-plate implant, including shorter operation duration, less intraoperative blood loss, reduced postoperative dysphagia, and slower adjacent disc degeneration. Additionally, Zero-P implant has a broader application space, making them a preferred choice in certain cases.

OBJECTIVE: The vertical level of carotid bifurcation (CB) is commonly indicated at the superior margin of the thyroid cartilage. Few studies observed the CB vertical topography. It was aimed at studying the vertical location of the CB as referred to vertebral and anterior cervical landmarks.
METHODS: An archived lot of 147 computed tomography angiograms was documented for the vertical level of CB referred to vertebral and anterior cervical landmarks. The topography of the CB in relation to anterior landmarks was classified into seven types: (1) at the superior margin of the thyroid cartilage; (2) between the hyoid and the thyroid cartilage; (3) at the hyoid level; (4) between the hyoid and mandible; (5) subgonial or supragonial CB; (6) lower cervical level; (7) intrathoracic.
RESULTS: The most common locations of CB were at C3 (27.21%), C3/C4 (26.19%) and C4 (25.51%). Bilateral symmetry of CB was found in 51.7%, except for C2 and C5/C6. Type 7 was not found, type 3 occurred in 39.12%, type 2 in 24.49%, type 1 in 13.95%, type 4 in 13.61%, type 5 in 6.12%, and type 6 in 2.72% (294 CBs). Bilateral symmetry of anterior types was found in 59.86%. Statistically significant correlations were found between sex and both left and right types and vertebral levels of CB.
CONCLUSIONS: The vertical topography of the CB is highly variable and has sex-related specificity. This detail should be included in the teaching of anatomy. Surgeons and interventionists should better document the carotid anatomy on a case-by-case basis.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to reirradiate head and neck cancers because of the toxicity from previous radiation dose delivery. Conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy often have poor target coverage. The new HyperArcTM VMAT (HA-VMAT) planning approach reportedly has better target coverage, higher conformity, and can spare normal organs compared to conventional VMAT; however, research on recurrent head and neck cancers is limited. Here, we report the clinical outcomes of HA-VMAT for previously irradiated hypopharyngeal cancer with solitary recurrence in the first cervical vertebra (C1).
METHODS: A 52-year-old Asian male was diagnosed with a hypopharyngeal cancer. The patient received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a radiation dose of 70 Gy in 33 fractions and achieved complete clinical response. Two years later, solitary recurrence was observed in the C1 vertebra.
METHODS: Solitary recurrence in the C1 vertebra.
METHODS: Owing to concerns regarding the toxicity to adjacent organs, we decided to use HA-VMAT to achieve better tumor coverage and critical organ sparing.
RESULTS: Tumor regression was observed on the imaging. At 9 months follow-up, the patient was disease-free and had no late toxicities.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report regarding the clinical outcomes of HA-VMAT for previously irradiated hypopharyngeal cancer with solitary recurrence over the C1 vertebra. HA-VMAT achieves highly conformal dose distribution and excellent sparing of critical organs. There was a favorable initial clinical response with no toxicity. Long-term follow-up is essential in such cases.

Alkaptonuria is a rare inborn disorder of phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism. It is characterized by an accumulation of homogentisic acid and its oxidation products, possibly resulting into connective tissue damaging. \"Ochronosis\" is a main feature, which is characterized by tissue discoloration and even alkaptonuric arthropathy. Cervical spine involvement is exceptional and there is a paucity of reports on surgical interventions in these patients. We explored the literature concerning cervical spine involvement in patients with alkaptonuria.
We performed a review of the literature, in which patients with alkaptonuric degenerative changes of the cervical spine were examined. Articles were obtained from MEDLINE. Search terms included: \"cervical\", \"alkaptonuria\", \"alkaptonuric changes\" and \"black disc\". Additional studies were identified by checking reference lists. Furthermore, we present the case of a 46 year old patient with critical cervical spinal canal stenosis who underwent C6-C7 anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody fusion, in order to prevent myelopathic changes. CARE statement guidelines were followed.
Peroperatively, we did not encounter any macroscopic abnormalities of the skin, muscles or ligaments. A black discoloration of the nucleus pulposus was observed. Peroperative and postoperative course was uneventful.
Alkaptonuric degenerative abnormalities most commonly involve the lumbar spine, although the cervical spine can be affected in rare cases. Most frequently, the diagnosis of alkaptonuria can be made based on the clinical phenotype many years before symptoms secondary to ochronotic arthropathy develop. A retrospective diagnosis based on peroperative black discoloration of spinal structures has been described. A black discoloration of the intervertebral disc should encourage the neurosurgeon to further explore the possibility of alkaptonuria, even in the absence of a clear phenotype. Surgical results are mostly satisfactory. Further studies are required in order to better understand this pathology and its postoperative course.

BACKGROUND: Cervical manipulations are widely used by physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, and medical doctors for musculoskeletal dysfunctions like neck pain and cervicogenic headache. The use of cervical manipulation remains controversial, since it is often considered to pose a risk for not only benign adverse events (AEs), such as aggravation of pain or muscle soreness, but also severe AEs such as strokes in the vertebrobasilar or carotid artery following dissections. Studies finding an association between cervical manipulation and serious AEs such as artery dissections are mainly case control studies or case reports. These study designs are not appropriate for investigating incidences and therefore do not imply causal relationships. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard study designs for assessing the unconfounded effects of benefits and harms, such as AEs, associated with therapies.
OBJECTIVE: Due to the unclear risk level of AEs associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) cervical manipulation, the aim of this study was to extract available information from RCTs and thereby synthesize the comparative risk of AEs following cervical manipulation to that of various control interventions.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Cochrane databases. This search included RCTs in which cervical HVLA manipulations were applied and AEs were reported. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, the methodological quality assessment, and the GRADE approach. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated. The study quality was assessed by using the risk of bias 2 (RoB-2) tool, and the certainty of evidence was determined by using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled IRR indicates no statistically significant differences between the manipulation and control groups. All the reported AEs were classified as mild, and none of the AEs reported were serious or moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: The search strategy was limited to literature in English or German. Furthermore, selection bias may have occurred, since only PubMed and Cochrane were used as databases, and searching was done by hand. RCTs had to be excluded if the results did not indicate the group in which the AEs occurred. A mandatory criterion for inclusion in the meta-analysis was a quantitative reproduction of the frequencies of AEs that could be attributed to specific interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, HVLA manipulation does not impose an increased risk of mild or moderate AEs compared to various control interventions. However, these results must be interpreted with caution, since RCTs are not appropriate for detecting the rare serious AEs. In addition, future RCTs should follow a standardized protocol for reporting AEs in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Pathological destruction of the axis vertebra leads to a highly unstable condition in an upper cervical spine. As surgical resection and anatomical reconstruction of the second cervical vertebrae represents a life threatening procedure, less radical approaches are preferred and only few cases of C2 prosthesis are described in literature.
METHODS: The focus of this case report is a 21-year-old man with a pathological fracture of C2 managed primarily surgically with the C1-C3 dorsal fusion. Due to the progression of giant cell tumor and destruction of the axis vertebra, C2 prosthesis through anterior approach and dorsal occipito-cervical fusion C0-C4 were performed. Postoperative infection was managed surgically with a 2-staged dorsal debridement, ostheosynthesis material change and autologous bone graft. After a 4 week-intravenous therapy with the ceftriaxone in combination with the amoxicillin/clavulanate, followed by 12 week per oral therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanate in combination with ciprofloxacin, the complete recovery of the infection was achieved. Radiotherapy was initiated 2 months after the last revision surgery and the patient showed a good clinical outcome with stable construct at a 1 year follow-up. A review of literature of all reported C2 prosthesis cases was performed CONCLUSION: C2 prosthesis allows a more radical resection in pathological processes involving the axis vertebra. Combined with the posterior fusion, immediate stability is achieved. Anterior surgical approach is through a highly unsterile oral environment which presents a high-risk of postoperative infection.

Understanding the motion characteristics of cervical spine through biomechanical analysis aids in the identification of abnormal joint movements. This knowledge is essential for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of related disorders. However, the anatomical structure of the cervical spine is complex, and traditional medical imaging techniques have certain limitations. Capturing the movement characteristics of various parts of the cervical spine in vivo during motion is challenging. The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) is able to quantify the motion and motion patterns of individual segments. In recent years, DFIS has achieved accurate non-invasive measurements of dynamic joint movements in humans. This review assesses the research findings of DFIS about the cervical spine in healthy and pathological individuals. Relevant study search was conducted up to October 2023 in Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCO databases. After the search, a total of 30 studies were ultimately included. Among them, 13 studies focused on healthy cervical spines, while 17 studies focused on pathological cervical spines. These studies mainly centered on exploring the vertebral bodies and associated structures of the cervical spine, including intervertebral discs, intervertebral foramina, and zygapophyseal joints. Further research could utilize DFIS to investigate cervical spine motion in different populations and under pathological conditions.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a burdensome condition associated with pain, disability, and economic cost. Neck pain has been associated with observable changes in neuromuscular function and biomechanics. Prior research shows impairments in kinematic control, including reduced mobility, velocity, and smoothness of cervical motion. However, the strength of association between these impairments and patient-reported pain and disability is unclear rendering development of novel and relevant rehabilitation strategies difficult. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize existing evidence on the strength of association between clinical biomechanical metrics of neck function (ROM, strength, acceleration, accuracy, smoothness, etc.) and patient-reported neck pain and disability.
METHODS: This protocol follows Cochrane guidelines and adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched, along with the gray literature, up to 20 November 2023, using terms and keywords derived from initial scoping searches. Observational studies, including cohorts and cross-sectional studies, that explore associations between clinical biomechanics of the neck and patient-reported outcomes of neck pain or disability will be included. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (National Institute of Health tool). Data will be synthesized using either a random effects meta-analytic approach or qualitatively using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, dependent on the homogeneity of data available.
UNASSIGNED: This review addresses a gap in the literature by systematically synthesizing findings on the relationship between neck function impairments and patient-reported outcomes. It will identify priorities for neck pain rehabilitation and gaps in current knowledge.
RESULTS: The results of this review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation, and lay language summaries posted on an open-access website.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42023417317. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023417317.

OBJECTIVE: Nerve transfers to restore or augment function after spinal cord injury is an expanding field. There is a paucity of information, however, on the use of nerve transfers for patients having undergone spine surgery. The incidence of neurologic deficit after spine surgery is rare but extremely debilitating. The purpose of this study was to describe the functional benefit after upper extremity nerve transfers in the setting of nerve injury after cervical spine surgery.
METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent nerve transfers after cervical spine surgery was completed. Patient demographics, injury features, spine surgery procedure, nerve conduction and electromyography study results, time to referral to nerve surgeon, time to surgery, surgical technique and number of nerve transfers performed, complications, postoperative muscle testing, and subjective outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: Fourteen nerve transfers were performed in 6 patients after cervical spine surgery. Nerve transfer procedures consisted of a transfer between a median nerve branch of flexor digitorum superficialis into a biceps nerve branch, an ulnar nerve branch of flexor carpi ulnaris into a brachialis nerve branch, a radial nerve branch of triceps muscle into the axillary nerve, and the anterior interosseous nerve into the ulnar motor nerve. Average patient age was 55 years; all patients were male and underwent surgery on their left upper extremity. Average referral time was 7 months, average time to nerve transfer was 9 months, and average follow-up was 21 months. Average preoperative muscle grading was 0.9 of 5, and average postoperative muscle grading was 4.1 of 5 ( P < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity peripheral nerve transfers can significantly help patients regain muscle function from deficits secondary to cervical spine procedures. The morbidity of the nerve transfers is minimal with measurable improvements in muscle function.

OBJECTIVE: This study employs both the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) to assess the level of robustness in the cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) literature. We hypothesize that dichotomous outcomes involving CDA would exhibit statistical vulnerability.
METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted to evaluate dichotomous data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CDA literature from 2000 to 2023. The FI of each outcome was calculated through the reversal of a single outcome event until significance was reversed. The FQ was calculated by dividing each fragility index by the study sample size. The interquartile range (IQR) was also calculated for the FI and FQ.
RESULTS: Of the 1561 articles screened, 111 met the search criteria, with 35 RCTs evaluating CDA included for analysis. Six hundred and ninety-three outcome events with 130 significant (P < 0.05) outcomes and 563 nonsignificant (P ≥ 0.05) outcomes were identified. The overall FI and FQ for all 693 outcomes were 5 (IQR 3-7) and 0.019 (IQR 0.011-0.043). Fragility analysis of statistically significant outcomes and nonsignificant outcomes both revealed an FI of 5. All of the studies reported loss to follow-up (LTF) data where 65.7% (23) did not report or reported an LTF greater or equal to 5.
CONCLUSIONS: The literature regarding CDA RCTs lacks statistical robustness and may misrepresent the conclusions with the sole use of the P value. By implementing the FI and FQ along with the P value, we believe the interpretation and contextualization of the clinical data surrounding CDA will be better understood.