Cardiovascular drugs

心血管药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据充分评估,女性在心血管临床试验中的代表性普遍不足。此外,据报道,药理学和干预策略存在显著差异.因此,在许多疾病中都显示了较差的结局和更显著的死亡率.还描述了药物代谢中的药代动力学和药效学差异,因此有效性可能因性别而异。然而,对性别差距的认识仍然很少。因此,缺乏针对性别的指导方针,在过去的几年中,对特定性别方法的需求变得更加明显。本文旨在评估管理最常见女性疾病的不同治疗方法。
    It has been well assessed that women have been widely under-represented in cardiovascular clinical trials. Moreover, a significant discrepancy in pharmacological and interventional strategies has been reported. Therefore, poor outcomes and more significant mortality have been shown in many diseases. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences in drug metabolism have also been described so that effectiveness could be different according to sex. However, awareness about the gender gap remains too scarce. Consequently, gender-specific guidelines are lacking, and the need for a sex-specific approach has become more evident in the last few years. This paper aims to evaluate different therapeutic approaches to managing the most common women\'s diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:由于令人鼓舞的临床前数据和支持性观察研究,人们对应用心血管药物(包括阿司匹林,血管紧张素转换酶[ACE]抑制剂,他汀类药物,和二甲双胍)被批准用于治疗高血压等疾病,高脂血症,和糖尿病进入肿瘤学领域。此外,考虑到癌症治疗的成本越来越高,这些药物为治疗或预防癌症复发提供了可能更实惠的途径.我们试图研究从心脏病学或抗炎药重新利用的药物治疗癌症的抗癌作用。我们特别评估了以下药物类别:HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物),环加氧酶抑制剂,阿司匹林,二甲双胍,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。我们还包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),因为它们通过阻断前列腺素和减少炎症而发挥与阿司匹林相似的机制,这被认为是促进癌症发展的。
    方法:我们使用PubMed和WebofScience进行了系统的文献综述,检索词包括“阿司匹林,\"\"NSAID,\"\"他汀\"(包括特定的他汀类药物名称),“二甲双胍,“”ACE抑制剂,“和”ARBs“(包括特定的抗高血压药物名称)与”癌症的组合。搜索仅限于2000年至2023年之间发表的人类研究。
    方法:报告阳性结果的研究数量和百分比以及总生存期的汇总估计,无进展生存期,回应,和无病生存。
    结果:我们回顾了3094篇论文,纳入了67项随机临床试验。最常见的药物是二甲双胍(n=21;30.9%)。塞来昔布(n=20;29.4%),和辛伐他汀(n=8;11.8%)。只有一项研究测试了强心苷,没有一项研究了ACE抑制剂。最常见的肿瘤类型为非小细胞肺癌(n=19;27.9%);乳腺癌(n=8;20.6%)。结直肠(n=7;10.3%),和肝细胞(n=6;8.8%)。大多数研究是在II期试验中进行的(n=38;55.9%)。大多数研究在转移性癌症(n=49;72.1%)和一线背景(n=36;521.9%)中进行了测试。四项研究(5.9%)因应计困难而提前停止。大多数研究没有证明无进展生存期(86.1%的研究测试无进展生存期)或总生存期(94.3%的研究测试总生存期)有改善。5项研究的无进展生存率得到改善(7.4%),3项研究的总生存率提高(4.4%).两项研究的总生存率明显更差(3.8%的研究检测总生存率),一项研究的无进展生存期较差(2.8%的无进展生存期研究).
    结论:尽管有希望的临床前和基于人群的数据,心血管药物和抗炎药在治疗或预防癌症复发方面总体上没有显示出益处.这些发现可能有助于指导涉及这些药物应用于肿瘤学的未来潜在临床试验。
    BACKGROUND: Due to encouraging pre-clinical data and supportive observational studies, there has been growing interest in applying cardiovascular drugs (including aspirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, statins, and metformin) approved to treat diseases such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus to the field of oncology. Moreover, given growing costs with cancer care, these medications have offered a potentially more affordable avenue to treat or prevent recurrence of cancer. We sought to investigate the anti-cancer effects of drugs repurposed from cardiology or anti-inflammatories to treat cancer. We specifically evaluated the following drug classes: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, aspirin, metformin, and both angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We also included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because they exert a similar mechanism to aspirin by blocking prostaglandins and reducing inflammation that is thought to promote the development of cancer.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review using PubMed and Web of Science with search terms including \"aspirin,\" \"NSAID,\" \"statin\" (including specific statin drug names), \"metformin,\" \"ACE inhibitors,\" and \"ARBs\" (including specific anti-hypertensive drug names) in combination with \"cancer.\" Searches were limited to human studies published between 2000 and 2023.
    METHODS: The number and percentage of studies reported positive results and pooled estimates of overall survival, progression-free survival, response, and disease-free survival.
    RESULTS: We reviewed 3094 titles and included 67 randomized clinical trials. The most common drugs that were tested were metformin (n = 21; 30.9%), celecoxib (n = 20; 29.4%), and simvastatin (n = 8; 11.8%). There was only one study that tested cardiac glycosides and none that studied ACE inhibitors. The most common tumor types were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 19; 27.9%); breast (n = 8; 20.6%), colorectal (n = 7; 10.3%), and hepatocellular (n = 6; 8.8%). Most studies were conducted in a phase II trial (n = 38; 55.9%). Most studies were tested in metastatic cancers (n = 49; 72.1%) and in the first-line setting (n = 36; 521.9%). Four studies (5.9%) were stopped early because of difficulty with accrual. The majority of studies did not demonstrate an improvement in either progression-free survival (86.1% of studies testing progression-free survival) or in overall survival (94.3% of studies testing overall survival). Progression-free survival was improved in five studies (7.4%), and overall survival was improved in three studies (4.4%). Overall survival was significantly worse in two studies (3.8% of studies testing overall survival), and progression-free survival was worse in one study (2.8% of studies testing progression-free survival).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising pre-clinical and population-based data, cardiovascular drugs and anti-inflammatory medications have overall not demonstrated benefit in the treatment or preventing recurrence of cancer. These findings may help guide future potential clinical trials involving these medications when applied in oncology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)是常用的糖尿病和肥胖药物,但与胃肠道(GI)不良事件有关。然而,关于比较GI不良反应概况的真实世界证据有限。
    目的:本研究旨在评估GLP-1类风湿性关节炎使用者的胃肠道不良事件,杜拉鲁肽,利拉鲁肽,和艾塞那肽关于胃肠道不良反应的安全性。
    方法:这项回顾性横断面分析利用了美国国立卫生研究院(NationalInstitutesofHealthAllofUs)中10,328名患有糖尿病/肥胖症的成年人的真实数据。确定了新的GLP-1RA用户,并检查胃肠道不良事件。Logistic回归确定与GI不良事件相关的因素。
    结果:研究人群的平均年龄为61.4±12.6岁,65.7%是女性,51.3%是白人,他们有很高的共病负担。腹痛(57.6%)是最常见的胃肠道不良事件,其次是便秘(30.4%),腹泻(32.7%),恶心和呕吐(23.4%),消化道出血(15.9%),胃轻瘫(5.1%),和胰腺炎(3.4%)。杜拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽的腹痛发生率较高,便秘,腹泻,恶心和呕吐比司马鲁肽和艾塞那肽。利拉鲁肽和艾塞那肽的胰腺炎发生率最高(4.0%和3.8%,分别)。与司马鲁肽相比,杜拉鲁肽和利拉鲁肽的腹痛几率更高,恶心和呕吐。他们的胃轻瘫几率也高于司马鲁肽。GLP-1RA之间的胃肠道出血或胰腺炎风险没有显着差异。
    结论:在这个现实世界中,GI不良事件在GLP-1RA中很常见。不同药物之间的胃肠道安全特征存在差异,艾塞那肽似乎比其他GLP-1RA更安全,除了胃轻瘫.这些发现可以告知GLP-1RA选择考虑GI风险因素。需要进一步的研究来评估伴随用药的因果关系和GLP-1RA安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are commonly used diabetes and obesity medications but have been associated with gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. However, real-world evidence on comparative GI adverse reaction profiles is limited.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate GI adverse events among GLP-1 RA users and compare semaglutide, dulaglutide, liraglutide, and exenatide safety regarding the GI adverse reaction profile.
    METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis utilized real-world data on 10,328 adults with diabetes/obesity in the National Institutes of Health All of Us cohort. New GLP-1 RA users were identified, and GI adverse events were examined. Logistic regression determined factors associated with GI adverse events.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 61.4 ± 12.6 years, 65.7% were female, 51.3% were White, and they had a high comorbidity burden. Abdominal pain (57.6%) was the most common GI adverse event, followed by constipation (30.4%), diarrhea (32.7%), nausea and vomiting (23.4%), GI bleeding (15.9%), gastroparesis (5.1%), and pancreatitis (3.4%). Dulaglutide and liraglutide had higher rates of abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, and nausea and vomiting than semaglutide and exenatide. Liraglutide and exenatide had the highest pancreatitis (4.0% and 3.8%, respectively). Compared to semaglutide, dulaglutide and liraglutide had higher odds of abdominal pain, and nausea and vomiting. They also had higher odds of gastroparesis than semaglutide. No significant differences existed in GI bleeding or pancreatitis risks between the GLP-1 RAs.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort, GI adverse events were common with GLP-1 RAs. Differences in GI safety profiles existed between agents, with exenatide appearing safer than other GLP-1 RAs, except for gastroparesis. These findings can inform GLP-1 RA selection considering GI risk factors. Further studies are needed to evaluate the causal relationship and GLP-1 RA safety with concomitant medication use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管心血管疾病是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,他们的药物治疗仍然不够理想。因此,开发更有效和更安全的药理学策略显然没有得到满足.在这次审查中,我们总结了2023年心血管药理学最相关的进展,包括批准了一流药物,为动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和心力衰竭的治疗开辟了新的途径.已上市的治疗梗阻性肥厚型心肌病的新适应症(再利用),高胆固醇血症,2型糖尿病,肥胖和心力衰竭,强调了多重用药对指南指导用药的影响以及阴性临床试验的结果.最后,最后,我们总结了最重要的2期和3期临床试验,这些临床试验评估了正在开发的用于预防和治疗心血管疾病的心血管药物的有效性和安全性。
    Although cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, their pharmacotherapy remains suboptimal. Thus, there is a clear unmet need to develop more effective and safer pharmacological strategies. In this review, we summarize the most relevant advances in cardiovascular pharmacology in 2023, including the approval of first-in-class drugs that open new avenues for the treatment of atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure (HF). The new indications of drugs already marketed (repurposing) for the treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypercholesterolaemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and HF; the impact of polypharmacy on guideline-directed drug use is highlighted as well as results from negative clinical trials. Finally, we end with a summary of the most important phase 2 and 3 clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of cardiovascular drugs under development for the prevention and treatment of CVDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管平滑肌KATP通道通过调节血管张力来调节血流量和血压,因此代表了治疗几种心血管疾病的有吸引力的药物靶标。然而,尽管进行了数十年的深入研究,但缺乏能够选择性抑制Kir6.1/SUR2B(血管KATP)而非Kir6.2/SUR1(胰腺KATP)的有效抑制剂,这暗示了这一发现.因此,我们筛选了47,872种化学上不同的化合物,用于异源表达的Kir6.1/SUR2B通道的新型抑制剂。在筛选中鉴定的最有效的抑制剂是称为VU0542270的N-芳基-N'-苄基脲化合物。VU0542270抑制Kir6.1/SUR2B,IC50约为100nM,但在高达30µM的剂量下对Kir6.2/SUR1或Kir通道家族的其他成员没有明显活性(>300倍选择性)。通过表达Kir6.1或Kir6.2与SUR1,SUR2A的不同组合,或SUR2B,VU0542270结合位点定位于SUR2.围绕VU0542270的初始结构-活性关系探索揭示了与Kir6.1/SUR2B抑制所需的结构元素相关的基本质地。对VU0542270的药代动力学特性的分析表明,由于广泛的代谢,其体内半衰期短。在离体小鼠动脉导管(DA)血管的压力肌电图实验中,VU0542270以类似于非特异性KATP通道抑制剂的剂量依赖性方式诱导DA收缩,格列本脲.VU0542270的发现提供了概念证明,可以使用基于分子靶标的方法开发SUR2特异性KATP通道抑制剂,并为开发靶向Kir6.1/SUR2B的心血管疗法提供了希望。意义陈述血管平滑肌KATP通道的小分子抑制剂可能代表动脉导管未闭的新疗法,偏头痛,和败血症,然而,缺乏选择性通道抑制剂减缓了这些治疗领域的进展.这里,我们描述了第一个血管特异性KATP通道抑制剂的发现和表征,VU0542270.
    Vascular smooth muscle KATP channels critically regulate blood flow and blood pressure by modulating vascular tone and therefore represent attractive drug targets for treating several cardiovascular disorders. However, the lack of potent inhibitors that can selectively inhibit Kir6.1/SUR2B (vascular KATP) over Kir6.2/SUR1 (pancreatic KATP) has eluded discovery despite decades of intensive research. We therefore screened 47,872 chemically diverse compounds for novel inhibitors of heterologously expressed Kir6.1/SUR2B channels. The most potent inhibitor identified in the screen was an N-aryl-N\'-benzyl urea compound termed VU0542270. VU0542270 inhibits Kir6.1/SUR2B with an IC50 of approximately 100 nM but has no apparent activity toward Kir6.2/SUR1 or several other members of the Kir channel family at doses up to 30 µM (>300-fold selectivity). By expressing different combinations of Kir6.1 or Kir6.2 with SUR1, SUR2A, or SUR2B, the VU0542270 binding site was localized to SUR2. Initial structure-activity relationship exploration around VU0542270 revealed basic texture related to structural elements that are required for Kir6.1/SUR2B inhibition. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic properties of VU0542270 showed that it has a short in vivo half-life due to extensive metabolism. In pressure myography experiments on isolated mouse ductus arteriosus vessels, VU0542270 induced ductus arteriosus constriction in a dose-dependent manner similar to that of the nonspecific KATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide. The discovery of VU0542270 provides conceptual proof that SUR2-specific KATP channel inhibitors can be developed using a molecular target-based approach and offers hope for developing cardiovascular therapeutics targeting Kir6.1/SUR2B. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Small-molecule inhibitors of vascular smooth muscle KATP channels might represent novel therapeutics for patent ductus arteriosus, migraine headache, and sepsis; however, the lack of selective channel inhibitors has slowed progress in these therapeutic areas. Here, this study describes the discovery and characterization of the first vascular-specific KATP channel inhibitor, VU0542270.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍心脑血管疾病在帕金森病(PD)患者中很常见,但目前尚不清楚心血管药物和口服抗凝剂的患病率如何与PD诊断相关。方法我们调查了2001-2015年芬兰17541例确诊为PD的患者和116829名匹配的对照人群中,有PD和无PD的患者使用心血管药物和口服抗凝剂的患病率。从PD诊断前五年到诊断后五年(索引日期)的六个月时间窗口中计算患病率,并使用广义估计方程与没有PD的匹配队列进行比较。结果PD患者任何心血管药物的患病率均较高(未调整OR=1.15;95%CI1.11-1.18)。和口服抗凝剂(未调整OR=1.16;95%CI1.11-1.22)在指数日期之前比没有PD。索引日期之后,PD患者的心血管药物患病率较低(0.94;95%CI0.91-0.96),口服抗凝剂没有差异。有和没有PD的人在指数日期的任何心血管药物的患病率分别为66%和61%。β受体阻滞剂是两个队列中最常见的心血管药物。华法林是最常见的口服抗凝剂,但在随访的最后几年中,直接口服抗凝剂的使用有所增加.结论体位性低血压和体重减轻可能解释了PD诊断后心血管药物使用的减少。口服抗凝剂的结果可能反映了临床评估的益处大于风险,尽管在PD患者中使用它们存在风险。
    BACKGROUND: Cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases are common among persons with Parkinson\'s disease (PD), but it is unknown how the prevalence of cardiovascular drug and oral anticoagulant use changes in relation to PD diagnosis.
    METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of cardiovascular drug and oral anticoagulant use among persons with and without PD among 17,541 persons who received incident PD diagnosis in 2001-2015 in Finland and their 116,829 matched comparison persons. Prevalence was calculated in 6-month time windows from 5 years before to 5 years after PD diagnosis (index date) and compared to a matched cohort without PD using generalized estimating equations.
    RESULTS: Persons with PD had higher prevalence of any cardiovascular drugs (unadjusted OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11-1.18) and oral anticoagulants (unadjusted OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.11-1.22) before index date than those without PD. After index date, persons with PD had lower prevalence of cardiovascular drugs (0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.96), and no difference was observed for oral anticoagulants. Prevalence of any cardiovascular drugs on the index date was 66 and 61% for persons with and without PD, respectively. β-blockers were the most common cardiovascular drugs in both cohorts. Warfarin was the most common oral anticoagulant, but the use of direct oral anticoagulants increased during the last years of follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Orthostatic hypotension and weight loss likely explain the decreased cardiovascular drug use after PD diagnosis. Results with oral anticoagulants may reflect clinical assessment of benefits being larger than risks, despite the risks associated with their use in persons with PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究在他汀类药物治疗对心血管(CV)事件风险的长期影响方面产生了有争议的结果。为了填补这一知识空白,我们分析了LDL-C水平和CV事件之间的关系在高血压患者没有以前的CV事件和单纯的抗血脂治疗,在意大利南部的“坎帕尼亚礼炮网络”内。我们研究了725名高血压患者,平均随访时间为85.4{正负}25.7个月。我们根据LDL-胆固醇(LDL-C)水平以mg/dL为单位将我们的人群分为3组:第1组)患者在随访期间显示平均LDL-C值{小于或等于}100mg/dL没有他汀类药物治疗;第2组)他汀类药物治疗LDL{小于或等于100mg/dL;第3组)LDL-C>100mg/dL的患者,有或没有他汀类药物。在人口统计学和临床特征以及药物方面,两组之间没有显着差异。第1组的首次CV事件发生率为6.0%,第2组为5.7%(n.s.vs第1组),在第3组中为11.9%(与第1组和第2组相比,p<0.05)。LDL-C血浆浓度的稳定长期令人满意的控制({小于或等于}100mg/dL)将主要CV事件的发生率从每58,6个患者/年1个事件降低至每115,9个患者/年1个事件。这些发现在Cox回归分析中得到了证实,调整潜在的混杂因素。一起来看,我们的数据表明,LDL-C稳定控制7年可使CV事件发生率降低40%.意义陈述孟德尔研究与其他关于降低LDL胆固醇血浆浓度对主要心血管事件发生率的实际影响的研究之间存在一些差异。一起来看,我们在非糖尿病受试者中的数据显示,LDL胆固醇的7年稳定控制可使心血管事件发生率降低约40%.
    Recent studies have yielded controversial results on the long-term effects of statins on the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and CV events in hypertensive patients without previous CV events and naïve to antidyslipidemic treatment within the \"Campania Salute Network\" in Southern Italy. We studied 725 hypertensive patients with a mean follow-up of 85.4 ± 25.7 months. We stratified our cohort into three groups based on LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in mg/dl: group 1) patients showing during the follow-up a mean LDL-C value ≤100 mg/dl in absence of statin therapy; group 2) statin-treated patients with LDL ≤100 mg/dl; and group 3) patients with LDL-C >100 mg/dl. No significant difference among the groups was observed in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and medications. The incidence of first CV events was 5.7% in group 1, 6.0% in group 2, and 11.9% in group 3 (P < 0.05 vs. group 1 and group 2). A stable long-term satisfactory control of LDL-C plasma concentration (≤100 mg/dl) reduced the incidence of major CV events from one event every 58.6 patients per year to one event every 115.9 patients per year. These findings were confirmed in a Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Collectively, our data demonstrate that a 7-year stable control of LDL-C reduces the incidence of CV events by 40%. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: There are several discrepancies between Mendelian studies and other investigations concerning the actual effects of reduction of plasma concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on the incidence of major cardiovascular events. Taken together, our data in nondiabetic subjects show that a 7-year stable control of LDL cholesterol induces a ∼40% reduction of the incidence of cardiovascular events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药物的生态毒理学影响受到了相当多的关注,主要关注活性药物成分(API),而在很大程度上忽略了药物赋形剂带来的潜在危害。因此,我们分析了16种常用药用辅料的生态毒性,以及使用Microtox®测试的26种API-赋形剂和赋形剂-赋形剂混合物。这样,我们评估了药用辅料的潜在风险,一般认为是安全的,可能会对水生环境造成影响。我们使用浓度添加(CA)和独立作用(IA)模型研究了它们的个体生态毒性及其与片剂成分的相互作用,以阐明这些物质经常被忽视的生态毒理学后果。CA模型提供了更准确的毒性预测,应推荐用于模拟具有不同作用的药物组合的毒性。在研究某些药物赋形剂的生态毒理学影响时,一个挑战是它们的水溶性差,这阻碍了标准水生生态毒性测试技术的使用。因此,我们使用了针对难溶性物质开发的Microtox®碱性固相方案的修改。获得的结果表明某些赋形剂的高毒性,即,SLS和葡甲胺,并确认原料药和赋形剂之间相互作用的发生。通过这项研究,我们希望能更好地了解药用辅料的生态影响,促使制药行业内风险评估策略的发展。
    The ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceuticals has received considerable attention, primarily focusing on active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) while largely neglecting the potential hazards posed by pharmaceutical excipients. Therefore, we analyzed the ecotoxicity of 16 commonly used pharmaceutical excipients, as well as 26 API-excipient and excipient-excipient mixtures utilizing the Microtox® test. In this way, we assessed the potential risks that pharmaceutical excipients, generally considered safe, might pose to the aquatic environment. We investigated both their individual ecotoxicity and their interactions with tablet ingredients using concentration addition (CA) and independent action (IA) models to shed light on the often-overlooked ecotoxicological consequences of these substances. The CA model gave a more accurate prediction of toxicity and should be recommended for modeling the toxicity of combinations of drugs with different effects. A challenge when studying the ecotoxicological impact of some pharmaceutical excipients is their poor water solubility, which hinders the use of standard aquatic ecotoxicity testing techniques. Therefore, we used a modification of the Microtox® Basic Solid Phase protocol developed for poorly soluble substances. The results obtained suggest the high toxicity of some excipients, i.e., SLS and meglumine, and confirm the occurrence of interactions between APIs and excipients. Through this research, we hope to foster a better understanding of the ecological impact of pharmaceutical excipients, prompting the development of risk assessment strategies within the pharmaceutical industry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的:脂肪因子在2型糖尿病(T2DM)动脉粥样硬化发展中的作用尚未完全阐明。药物对脂肪因子浓度的影响仅在极少数研究中得到评估,尽管它们可能具有临床重要性。本研究旨在评估循环脂肪因子的浓度是否可以预测T2DM患者的亚临床动脉粥样硬化。以及它们与常用心血管药物的相互作用。材料和方法:我们基于人群的横断面多中心研究包括216名T2DM患者,但先前未诊断为动脉粥样硬化。颈动脉内中膜厚度(IMT),测量斑块和踝肱指数(ABI)指标.Resistin,visfatin,使用Luminex的xMAP技术评估视黄醇结合蛋白4,高分子量脂联素和瘦素水平。结果:内脂素和抵抗素浓度与IMT呈正相关(分别为p=0.002和p=0.009)。男性内脂素与IMT≥1.0mm的相关性显著(p<0.001)。内脂素与IMT≥1.0mm或斑块呈正相关(p=0.008),而抵抗素仅与斑块相关(p=0.049)。内脂素预测β受体阻滞剂单药治疗患者的IMT≥1.0mm或斑块(p=0.031)。内脂素在服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的患者中失去了预测亚临床动脉粥样硬化的能力,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,钙通道阻滞剂或他汀类药物。在调整动脉粥样硬化和心血管药物的危险因素后,内脂素与平均IMT保持独立关联(p=0.003),IMT≥1.0mm或斑块(p=0.005),ABI≤0.9(p=0.029)。结论:内脂素可作为T2DM患者亚临床动脉粥样硬化的标志物,尤其是男性。内脂素浓度的评估可以帮助识别可以从实施针对动脉粥样硬化的预防措施中受益的个体。
    Background and Objectives: The role of adipokines in the development of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has not yet been fully elucidated. The effects of drugs on adipokine concentrations have only been evaluated in very few studies, although they may be of clinical importance. This study aimed to assess whether the concentrations of circulating adipokines could predict subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM, as well as their interactions with commonly used cardiovascular drugs. Materials and Methods: Our population-based cross-sectional multicentric study included 216 participants with T2DM but without previously diagnosed atherosclerosis. The carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), plaque and ankle-brachial index (ABI) metrics were measured. Resistin, visfatin, retinol-binding protein 4, high molecular weight adiponectin and leptin levels were evaluated using Luminex\'s xMAP technology. Results: Visfatin and resistin concentrations correlated positively with IMT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.009, respectively). The correlation of visfatin to IMT ≥ 1.0 mm was significant in males (p < 0.001). Visfatin had a positive correlation with IMT ≥ 1.0 mm or plaque (p = 0.008) but resistin only correlated with plaque (p = 0.049). Visfatin predicted IMT ≥ 1.0 mm or plaque in patients on β-blocker monotherapy (p = 0.031). Visfatin lost its ability to predict subclinical atherosclerosis in patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or statins. After adjustments for risk factors for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular drugs, visfatin maintained an independent association with mean IMT (p = 0.003), IMT ≥ 1.0 mm or plaque (p = 0.005) and ABI ≤ 0.9 (p = 0.029). Conclusions: Visfatin could be used as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM, especially in males. The assessment of visfatin concentration could aid in identifying individuals who could benefit from implementing preventive measures against atherosclerosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19的流行在许多方面扰乱了护理和获得护理的机会。伴随着过量的心血管药物治疗中断。我们试图通过评估COVID-19疫情是否在持续时间方面引起了抗高血压药物治疗中断特征的一些变化,来调查COVID-19疫情对抗高血压药物治疗中断的更深层次潜在影响。治疗结果,和患者特征。方法:从2018年3月至2021年2月,使用法国国家健康保险数据库进行重复队列分析。使用预先形成的中断时间序列分析,每季度评估一次流行对治疗中断和恢复降压药物的影响。结果:在所有接受降压药物治疗的成年患者中,我们在法国确定了2,318,844人(18.7%)在第一个阻断期停止降压治疗.在中断治疗的患者的特征或治疗中断的持续时间之间没有观察到差异。COVID-19的流行并没有伴随着中断后完全恢复治疗的患者比例的变化,无论是水平还是趋势/斜率[水平变化:2.66(-0.11;5.42);斜率变化:-0.67(-1.54;0.20)]。中断后1年内永久停止治疗的患者比例相似[水平变化:-0.21(-2.08;1.65);斜率变化:0.24(-0.40;0.87)]。结论:本研究表明,尽管它导致了心血管药物中断的增加,COVID-19的流行并没有改变这些疾病的特征。首先,中断没有延长,中断后治疗结果保持不变.第二,在COVID-19爆发期间出现抗高血压药物中断的患者与之前出现中断的患者基本相似.
    Background: The COVID-19 epidemic has disrupted care and access to care in many ways. It was accompanied by an excess of cardiovascular drug treatment discontinuations. We sought to investigate a deeper potential impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on antihypertensive drug treatment disruptions by assessing whether the epidemic induced some changes in the characteristics of disruptions in terms of duration, treatment outcome, and patient characteristics. Methods: From March 2018 to February 2021, a repeated cohort analysis was performed using French national health insurance databases. The impact of the epidemic on treatment discontinuations and resumption of antihypertensive medications was assessed using preformed interrupted time series analyses either on a quarterly basis. Results: Among all adult patients on antihypertensive medication, we identified 2,318,844 (18.7%) who discontinued their antihypertensive treatment during the first blocking period in France. No differences were observed between periods in the characteristics of patients who interrupted their treatment or in the duration of treatment disruptions. The COVID-19 epidemic was not accompanied by a change in the proportion of patients who fully resumed treatment after a disruption, neither in level nor in trend/slope [change in level: 2.66 (-0.11; 5.42); change in slope: -0.67 (-1.54; 0.20)]. Results were similar for the proportion of patients who permanently discontinued treatment within 1 year of disruption [level change: -0.21 (-2.08; 1.65); slope change: 0.24 (-0.40; 0.87)]. Conclusion: This study showed that, although it led to an increase in cardiovascular drug disruptions, the COVID-19 epidemic did not change the characteristics of these. First, disruptions were not prolonged, and post-disruption treatment outcomes remained unchanged. Second, patients who experienced antihypertensive drug disruptions during the COVID-19 outbreak were essentially similar to those who experienced disruptions before it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号