Biliary tract surgical procedures

胆道外科手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种常见的手术方法,有时术中可能发生并发症,这些并发症可能未被诊断或未报告,患者可能在以后出现这些并发症的表现。本研究提供了一个病例系列,包括腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的三例“幽灵并发症”,强调仔细的后续护理和有效的沟通,以及时识别和管理手术后出现的任何并发症的最大意义。
    方法:介绍3例胆道术后鬼影并发症。由于非典型症状表现和随访不足等因素,这些并发症最初被忽略或消除。这些病例涉及保留的结石导致继发性并发症,胆漏被术后症状掩盖,和胆囊切除术后综合征误认为无关的疾病。
    当症状偏离预期的术后病程时,诊断鬼影并发症具有挑战性。细致的临床怀疑和跨学科合作对于准确诊断和及时干预至关重要。患者和外科医生之间的有效沟通对于确保适当的管理至关重要。
    结论:这项研究阐明了胆道手术后“幽灵并发症”的概念,强调他们的认可和管理方面的挑战。通过三个不同的案例,这项研究强调了警惕后续护理的重要性,早期症状识别,和开放的沟通,以防止和解决这种并发症。透明的沟通和细致的监测对于提高患者预后和减轻“幽灵并发症”的发生至关重要。\"
    BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure and there are instances where complications may occur intraoperatively which can go undiagnosed or unreported and the patient can present at a later time with the manifestations of those complications. This study presents a case series comprising three instances of \"ghost complications\" following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, emphasizing the utmost significance of careful follow-up care and efficient communication to promptly recognize and manage any complications arising after the surgery.
    METHODS: Three cases of ghost complications post-biliary surgery are presented. These complications were initially overlooked or dismissed due to factors such as atypical symptom presentation and inadequate follow-up. The cases involve retained stones leading to secondary complications, bile leak masked by postoperative symptoms, and post-cholecystectomy syndrome mistaken for unrelated conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: Diagnosing ghost complications is challenging when symptoms diverge from the expected postoperative course. Meticulous clinical suspicion and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial for accurate diagnoses and timely intervention. Effective communication between patients and surgeons is pivotal in ensuring appropriate management.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates the concept of \"ghost complications\" after biliary surgery, highlighting challenges in their recognition and management. Through three distinct cases, the study underscores the significance of vigilant follow-up care, early symptom recognition, and open communication to prevent and address such complications. Transparent communication and meticulous monitoring are vital for enhancing patient outcomes and mitigating the occurrence of \"ghost complications.\"
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    风险评估是困难的,但将为外科医生和大型肝胆手术的患者提供有价值的数据。理想的风险计算器应该通过高效,及时,和准确的风险分层。美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改善计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器(SRC)和朴茨茅斯生理和手术严重程度评分(P-POSSUM)是手术风险分层工具用于评估术后发病率。在这项研究中,从一家三级大学医院接受大型肝胆手术的300例患者的术前数据从电子病历中回顾性收集,并输入ACS-SRC和P-POSSUM系统。并据此计算和记录所产生的风险评分.ACS-NSQIP-M1(C统计量=0.725)和M2(C统计量=0.791)模型显示出比P-POSSUM-M1(C统计量=0.672)模型更好的发病率辨别能力。P-POSSUM-M2(C-statistics=0.806)模型在发病率方面比其他模型显示出更好的分化成功率。ACS-NSQIP-M1(C统计量=0.888)和M2(C统计量=0.956)模型显示出比P-POSSUM-M1(C统计量=0.776)模型更好的死亡率判别。P-POSSUM-M2(C-statistics=0.948)模型显示出比ACS-NSQIP-M1和P-POSSUM-M1模型更好的死亡率分化成功率。在大型肝胆手术中使用ACS-SRC和P-POSSUM计算器可提供定量数据,以评估外科医生和患者的风险。将这些计算器集成到术前评估实践中可以增强患者的决策过程。统计分析结果表明,发病率的P-POSSUM-M2模型和死亡率的ACS-NSQIP-M2模型表现出优异的总体表现。
    Risk assessment is difficult yet would provide valuable data for both the surgeons and the patients in major hepatobiliary surgeries. An ideal risk calculator should improve workflow through efficient, timely, and accurate risk stratification. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) surgical risk calculator (SRC) and Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) are surgical risk stratification tools used to assess postoperative morbidity. In this study, preoperative data from 300 patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgeries performed at a single tertiary university hospital were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records and entered into the ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM systems, and the resulting risk scores were calculated and recorded accordingly. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.725) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.791) models showed better morbidity discrimination ability than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.672) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.806) model showed better differentiation success in morbidity than other models. The ACS-NSQIP-M1 (C-statistics = 0.888) and M2 (C-statistics = 0.956) models showed better mortality discrimination than P-POSSUM-M1 (C-statistics = 0.776) model. The P-POSSUM-M2 (C-statistics = 0.948) model showed better mortality differentiation success than the ACS-NSQIP-M1 and P-POSSUM-M1 models. The use of ACS-SRC and P-POSSUM calculators for major hepatobiliary surgeries offers quantitative data to assess risks for both the surgeon and the patient. Integrating these calculators into preoperative evaluation practices can enhance decision-making processes for patients. The results of the statistical analyses indicated that the P-POSSUM-M2 model for morbidity and the ACS-NSQIP-M2 model for mortality exhibited superior overall performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    右美托咪定(Dex)可能具有抗炎特性,并可能降低术后器官损伤的发生率。
    研究Dex是否通过其抗炎作用保护长期肝胆和胰腺手术的老年患者的肺和肾功能。
    在2019年10月至2020年12月期间,这项随机对照试验在重庆的一家三级医院进行,中国。
    86名年龄在60-75岁、接受长时间(>4小时)肝胆和胰腺手术且无明显合并症的患者被纳入研究,并以1:1的比例随机分为两组。
    患者给予Dex或等量的0.9%盐水(安慰剂),负荷剂量为1μgkg-1,持续10分钟,然后用0.5μgkg-1hr-1维持直到手术结束。
    血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)浓度的变化是主要结果。
    术后一小时,安慰剂组血清IL-6增加9倍(P<0.05)。与安慰剂组相比,Dex的给药使IL-6降低至278.09±45.43pg/mL(95%CI:187.75至368.43)(P=0.019;432.16±45.43pg/mL,95%CI:341.82~522.50)。然而,两组间TNF-α无显著差异。安慰剂组术后急性肾损伤的发生率(9.30%)是Dex组(4.65%)的两倍,Dex组术后急性肺损伤发生率为23.26%,低于安慰剂组(30.23%),虽然两组间无统计学意义。
    接受大型肝胆和胰腺手术的老年患者服用Dex可减少炎症并可能保护肾脏和肺部。
    中国临床试验注册中心,标识符:ChiCTR1900024162,于2019年6月28日。
    UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) may have anti-inflammatory properties and potentially reduce the incidence of postoperative organ injury.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate whether Dex protects pulmonary and renal function via its anti-inflammatory effects in elderly patients undergoing prolonged major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Between October 2019 and December 2020, this randomized controlled trial was carried out at a tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China.
    UNASSIGNED: 86 patients aged 60-75 who underwent long-duration (> 4 hrs) hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery without significant comorbidities were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups at a 1:1 ratio.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were given either Dex or an equivalent volume of 0.9% saline (Placebo) with a loading dose of 1 μg kg-1 for 10 min, followed by 0.5 μg kg-1 hr-1 for maintenance until the end of surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The changes in serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were primary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: At one hour postoperatively, serum IL-6 displayed a nine-fold increase (P<0.05) in the Placebo group. Administration of Dex decreased IL-6 to 278.09 ± 45.43 pg/mL (95% CI: 187.75 to 368.43) compared to the Placebo group (P=0.019; 432.16 ± 45.43 pg/mL, 95% CI: 341.82 to 522.50). However, no significant differences in TNF-α were observed between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury was twice as high in the Placebo group (9.30%) compared to the Dex group (4.65%), and the incidence of postoperative acute lung injury was 23.26% in the Dex group, lower than that in the Placebo group (30.23%), although there was no statistical significance between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Dex administration in elderly patients undergoing major hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery reduces inflammation and potentially protects kidneys and lungs.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: ChiCTR1900024162, on 28 June 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:化脓性肝脓肿(PLA)是一种常见的肝胆感染,其发病率越来越高,胆道手术被确定为触发因素。我们的目的是研究有和没有胆道手术史(BS)的PLA患者的临床特征和治疗方法。
    方法:该研究包括2014年1月至2023年2月在我院接受治疗的353名PLA患者。这些患者分为两组:BS组(n=91)和非BS组(n=262)。在BS组中,根据吻合方法,它们进一步分为胆肠吻合组(BEA,n=22)和非胆肠吻合组(非BEA,n=69)。记录并分析临床特点。
    结果:有BS病史的PLA患者比例为25.78%。BS组表现出升高的TBIL水平和活化的APTT异常(分别为P=0.009和P=0.041)。在BS组中,与非BEA亚组相比,BEA亚组的糖尿病(P<0.001)和孤立性脓肿(P=0.008)患病率更高.大肠杆菌在BS组中更常见,如脓液培养阳性(P=0.021)所示。与非BS病史相比,BS组的治疗效果降低(P=0.020)。有趣的是,BS组接受保守治疗的比例更高(45.05%vs.21.76%),随着手术引流利用率的降低(6.59%vs.16.41%)。
    结论:有BS病史的患者,尤其是那些经历过BEA的人,对PLA形成的易感性增加而不影响预后。
    OBJECTIVE: Pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) is a common hepatobiliary infection that has been shown to have an increasing incidence, with biliary surgery being identified as a trigger. Our aim was to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatments of PLA patients with and without a history of biliary surgery (BS).
    METHODS: The study included a total of 353 patients with PLA who received treatment at our hospital between January 2014 and February 2023. These patients were categorized into two groups: the BS group (n = 91) and the non-BS group (n = 262). In the BS group, according to the anastomosis method, they were further divided into bilioenteric anastomoses group (BEA, n = 22) and non-bilioenteric anastomoses group (non-BEA, n = 69). Clinical characteristics were recorded and analyzed.
    RESULTS: The percentage of PLA patients with BS history was 25.78%. The BS group exhibited elevated levels of TBIL and activated APTT abnormalities (P = 0.009 and P = 0.041, respectively). Within the BS group, the BEA subgroup had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001) and solitary abscesses (P = 0.008) compared to the non-BEA subgroup. Escherichia coli was more frequently detected in the BS group, as evidenced by positive pus cultures (P = 0.021). The BS group exhibited reduced treatment efficacy compared to those non-BS history (P = 0.020). Intriguingly, the BS group received a higher proportion of conservative treatment (45.05% vs. 21.76%), along with reduced utilization of surgical drainage (6.59% vs. 16.41%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BS history, especially those who have undergone BEA, have an increased susceptibility to PLA formation without affecting prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开发了一种新的腹腔镜胆肠吻合术仿真模型和培训课程。目前,这一概念缺乏将技能从模拟转移到临床环境的证据.进行这项研究是为了确定使用3D胆肠吻合模型进行训练是否比涉及视频观察和一般缝合模型的传统训练方法产生更大的技能转移。
    方法:本研究包括15名没有腹腔镜胆肠吻合术经验的普通外科医生,并随机分为三个训练组:仅视频观察,练习使用一般的缝合模型,并使用3D打印胆肠吻合模型进行实践。经过五次培训,每位外科医生被要求在分离的猪器官模型上进行腹腔镜胆肠吻合术.记录并比较三个训练组的手术时间和手术性能评分。
    结果:3D打印模型组的手术时间明显短于缝合和录像观察组(P=0.040)。此外,3D打印模型组的性能评分明显高于缝合和视频观察组(P=0.001)。最后,在离体猪器官模型中,腹腔镜胆肠吻合的目标评分在3D模型组中显著高于缝合和录像观察组(P=0.004).
    结论:与传统训练技术相比,在腹腔镜胆肠吻合术中使用新型3D打印模型进行模拟训练有助于提高技能获取和向动物环境的可转移性。
    OBJECTIVE: A new simulation model and training curriculum for laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis has been developed. Currently, this concept lacks evidence for the transfer of skills from simulation to clinical settings. This study was conducted to determine whether training with a three-dimensional (3D) bilioenteric anastomosis model result in greater transfer of skills than traditional training methods involving video observation and a general suture model.
    METHODS: Fifteen general surgeons with no prior experience in laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis were included in this study and randomised into three training groups: video observation only, practice using a general suture model, and practice using a 3D-printed biliary-enteric anastomosis model. Following five training sessions, each surgeon was asked to perform a laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis procedure on an isolated swine organ model. The operative time and performance scores of the procedure were recorded and compared among the three training groups.
    RESULTS: The operation time in the 3D-printed model group was significantly shorter than the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.040). Furthermore, the performance score of the 3D-printed model group was significantly higher than those of the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.001). Finally, the goal score for laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis in the isolated swine organ model was significantly higher in the 3D model group than in the suture and video observation groups ( P =0.004).
    CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of a novel 3D-printed model for simulation training in laparoscopic biliary-enteric anastomosis facilitates improved skill acquisition and transferability to an animal setting compared with traditional training techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    :经口胆道镜检查(POC)已用于评估肝内导管(IHD)病变,但作用有限。设计了一种新型多弯曲(MB)超声内窥镜,以提高POC性能。我们使用MB超声内窥镜评估了POC在IHD病变处理中的有用性。
    :在2017年3月至2020年3月之间,22例患者使用MB超声内镜对IHD病变进行了直接POC检查,这些病变由先前的影像学检查或胰胆管造影术记录。主要结果是POC的技术成功,次要结果是POC指导干预措施的技术成功,中位手术时间,和POC相关的不良事件。
    :使用MB超声内窥镜对IHD病变进行POC的技术成功率为95.5%(21/22)。95.2%(20/21)的徒手插入成功。POC指导干预的总体技术成功率为100%(21/21),包括9个诊断程序和12个治疗程序(8个直接取石和4个导管内碎石)。中位手术时间为29分钟(范围,9至79分钟)。没有与手术相关的不良事件。
    :使用MB超声内窥镜的直接POC可以直接观察IHD病变,并可能对某些患者的诊断和治疗管理有用。
    : Peroral cholangioscopy (POC) has been used to assess intrahepatic duct (IHD) lesions but with a limited role. A new multibending (MB) ultraslim endoscope has been designed to improve POC performance. We evaluated the usefulness of POC using the MB ultraslim endoscope for the management of IHD lesions.
    : Between March 2017 and March 2020, 22 patients underwent direct POC using the MB ultraslim endoscope for IHD lesions documented by previous imaging or cholangiopancreatography. The primary outcome was technical success of POC, and secondary outcomes were technical success of POC-guided interventions, median procedure time, and POC-related adverse events.
    : The technical success rate for POC using the MB ultraslim endoscope for IHD lesions was 95.5% (21/22). Free-hand insertion was successful in 95.2% (20/21). The overall technical success rate for POC-guided intervention was 100% (21/21), including nine diagnostic and 12 therapeutic procedures (eight direct stone removal and four intraductal lithotripsies). The median procedure time was 29 minutes (range, 9 to 79 minutes). There were no procedure-related adverse events.
    : Direct POC using the MB ultraslim endoscope allows direct visualization of IHD lesions and may be useful for diagnosis and therapeutic management in selected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:单操作者胆道镜检查(SOC)提供了一种诊断和治疗替代方案,其光学分辨率优于传统技术;然而,这项技术没有标准化的临床实践指南。哥伦比亚消化内镜协会(ACED)的循证指南旨在支持患者,临床医生,和其他人在决定在成人中使用SOC与内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相比,诊断不确定的胆道狭窄和处理困难的胆道结石。
    方法:ACED创建了一个平衡的多学科指南小组,以最大程度地减少利益冲突带来的潜在偏见。洛斯安第斯大学和哥伦比亚对建议的评估,发展和评估(等级)网络支持指导方针制定过程,更新和执行系统的证据审查。小组根据临床医生和患者的重要性,优先考虑临床问题和结果。使用了等级方法,包括等级证据到决策框架。
    结果:在比较SOC与ERCP时,专家组同意一项针对不确定的胆道狭窄的成年患者的建议和一项针对困难的胆道结石的成年患者的建议。
    结论:对于不确定的胆道狭窄的成年患者,专家小组有条件地推荐使用狭窄模式表征的SOC,而ERCP采用刷洗和/或活检的敏感性,特异性,和手术成功率结果。对于患有困难的胆道结石的成年患者,小组有条件地建议SOC超过ERCP并进行大球囊扩张乳头。需要对SOC的经济估计和知识翻译评估进行更多研究,以在当地环境中实施SOC干预。
    OBJECTIVE: Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) offer a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative with an improved optical resolution over conventional techniques; however, there are no standardized clinical practice guidelines for this technology. This evidence-based guideline from the Colombian Association of Digestive Endoscopy (ACED) intends to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about using in adults the SOC compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), to diagnose indeterminate biliary stricture and to manage difficult biliary stones.
    METHODS: ACED created a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. Universidad de los Andes and the Colombia Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Network supported the guideline-development process, updating and performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks.
    RESULTS: The panel agreed on one recommendation for adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures and one for adult patients with difficult biliary stones when comparing SOC versus ERCP.
    CONCLUSIONS: For adult patients with indeterminate biliary strictures, the panel made a conditional recommendation for SOC with stricture pattern characterization over ERCP with brushing and/or biopsy for sensitivity, specificity, and procedure success rate outcomes. For the adult patients with difficult biliary stones the panel made conditional recommendation for SOC over ERCP with large-balloon dilation of papilla. Additional research is required on economic estimations of SOC and knowledge translation evaluations to implement SOC intervention in local contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号