Auditory Threshold

听觉阈值
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于与衰减有关的因素,患有听力损失的老年人可能难以识别噪声中的语音(例如,降低的听觉和感觉水平,SL)和失真(例如,减少时间精细结构,TFS,处理)。此外,当语音和掩蔽器的幅度调制频谱不重叠时,语音识别可以改进。当前的研究通过将幅度调制频谱过滤为语音和语音调制噪声的不同调制速率来对此进行研究。操纵噪声的调制深度以改变语音瞥见的SL。听力正常的年轻人和听力正常或受损的老年人听自然语音或语音编码以降低TFS提示。对照组的年轻人在所有条件下进行了测试,包括频谱形状的语音和阈值匹配噪声,这降低了可听度,以匹配年龄较大的听力受损组。所有组都受益于增加的掩蔽调制深度和音节率语音调制的保留。患有听力损失的老年人在所有情况下都会降低语音识别能力。这可以通过与衰减有关的因素来解释,由于SL减少,和失真,由于减少了TFS处理,这导致掩蔽器浸入时语音提示的听觉处理较差。
    Older adults with hearing loss may experience difficulty recognizing speech in noise due to factors related to attenuation (e.g., reduced audibility and sensation levels, SLs) and distortion (e.g., reduced temporal fine structure, TFS, processing). Furthermore, speech recognition may improve when the amplitude modulation spectrum of the speech and masker are non-overlapping. The current study investigated this by filtering the amplitude modulation spectrum into different modulation rates for speech and speech-modulated noise. The modulation depth of the noise was manipulated to vary the SL of speech glimpses. Younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with normal or impaired hearing listened to natural speech or speech vocoded to degrade TFS cues. Control groups of younger adults were tested on all conditions with spectrally shaped speech and threshold matching noise, which reduced audibility to match that of the older hearing-impaired group. All groups benefitted from increased masker modulation depth and preservation of syllabic-rate speech modulations. Older adults with hearing loss had reduced speech recognition across all conditions. This was explained by factors related to attenuation, due to reduced SLs, and distortion, due to reduced TFS processing, which resulted in poorer auditory processing of speech cues during the dips of the masker.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    螺旋神经节神经元和内毛细胞之间的突触丢失(IHC突触病)导致称为隐性听力损失(HHL)的听觉神经病变,其特征在于正常的听觉阈值,但声音诱发的听觉电位的幅度降低。有人提出,尽管听力图正常,但突触疗法和HHL在具有挑战性的听力任务中的表现不佳。然而,这只在暴露于噪音或耳毒性药物后的动物中进行了测试,这可能导致突触之外的缺陷。此外,尚未评估过数突触对听觉处理的影响。这里,我们研究了通过改变IHC支持细胞中神经营养蛋白3(Ntf3)的表达而增加或减少IHC突触计数的小鼠.正如我们之前所展示的,出生后Ntf3敲低或过表达减少或增加,分别,在不改变耳蜗阈值的情况下,声音诱发听觉电位的IHC突触密度和阈值幅度。我们现在表明,IHC突触密度不会影响声惊吓反射或其脉冲前抑制的幅度。相比之下,间隙前脉冲抑制,听觉时间处理的行为测试,根据Ntf3表达水平降低或增强。这些结果表明IHC突触病会导致HHL中预测的时间处理缺陷。此外,通过增加Ntf3表达和突触密度实现的时间敏锐度改善提示了一种治疗策略,可以改善患有各种病因的突触病的个体的噪声听力。
    Loss of synapses between spiral ganglion neurons and inner hair cells (IHC synaptopathy) leads to an auditory neuropathy called hidden hearing loss (HHL) characterized by normal auditory thresholds but reduced amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials. It has been proposed that synaptopathy and HHL result in poor performance in challenging hearing tasks despite a normal audiogram. However, this has only been tested in animals after exposure to noise or ototoxic drugs, which can cause deficits beyond synaptopathy. Furthermore, the impact of supernumerary synapses on auditory processing has not been evaluated. Here, we studied mice in which IHC synapse counts were increased or decreased by altering neurotrophin 3 (Ntf3) expression in IHC supporting cells. As we previously showed, postnatal Ntf3 knockdown or overexpression reduces or increases, respectively, IHC synapse density and suprathreshold amplitude of sound-evoked auditory potentials without changing cochlear thresholds. We now show that IHC synapse density does not influence the magnitude of the acoustic startle reflex or its prepulse inhibition. In contrast, gap-prepulse inhibition, a behavioral test for auditory temporal processing, is reduced or enhanced according to Ntf3 expression levels. These results indicate that IHC synaptopathy causes temporal processing deficits predicted in HHL. Furthermore, the improvement in temporal acuity achieved by increasing Ntf3 expression and synapse density suggests a therapeutic strategy for improving hearing in noise for individuals with synaptopathy of various etiologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在过去几年中,长期保留人工耳蜗植入后的残余听力已成为主要目标。本研究的目的是使用中期scala电极评估长期随访中的残余听力。
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,单中心研究,我们收集了2014年至2015年间使用中缝电极植入低频范围残余听力的27例患者的数据.术后(手术后第1天)和长期随访43.7±6.9个月直接进行听力阈值的测量。听力学听力保留程度的计算是使用Skarsynski的HEARRING组公式确定的。
    结果:在250Hz至1kHz的低频范围内,有69.2%的病例实现了残余听力的术后保留,其中89.5%的患者有建议使用电声刺激(EAS)的频率。在长期随访中,30.8%的患者表现出残余听力;然而,57.1%的人显然受益于EAS。
    结论:保留残余听力在长期使用中电极是可行的。术后,超过一半的患者受益于EAS策略.长期随访显示残余听力有一定程度的下降。然而,这些结果与其他类型电极的研究相当。未来应进行进一步的研究,以更好地评估长期随访中的听力损失,与直接术后听力学结果相比。
    OBJECTIVE: The long-term preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has become a major goal over the past few years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate residual hearing in the long-term follow-up using mid-scala electrodes.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected data from 27 patients who were implanted between 2014 and 2015 with residual hearing in the low-frequency range using a mid-scala electrode. Measurements of the hearing thresholds were carried out directly postoperatively (day 1 after surgery) and in the long-term follow-up 43.7 ± 6.9 months. The calculation of the extent of audiological hearing preservation was determined using the HEARRING group formula by Skarsynski.
    RESULTS: Postoperative preservation of residual hearing was achieved in 69.2% of the cases in the low-frequency range between 250 Hz and 1 kHz, of which 89.5% of the patients had frequencies that suggested using electroacoustic stimulation (EAS). In the long-term follow-up, 30.8% of the patients showed residual hearing; however, 57.1% had apparently benefited from EAS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of residual hearing is feasible in the long term using mid-scala electrodes. Postoperatively, there is over the half of patients who benefit from an EAS strategy. The long-term follow-up shows a certain decrease in residual hearing. However, these results are comparable to studies relating to other types of electrodes. Further research should be conducted in future to better evaluate hearing loss in long-term follow-up, compared to direct postoperative audiological results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项多中心研究检查了9至11个月大的儿童人工耳蜗植入的安全性和有效性。预期的影响是支持有关儿科人工耳蜗候选人的候选人资格评估和预后咨询的实践。分析中包括了在美国和加拿大的五个人工耳蜗植入中心使用人工耳蜗有限公司设备在9-11个月大的儿童的临床图表中的数据。该研究包括2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日(队列1,n=83)或2018年1月1日至2020年5月15日(队列2,n=50)期间植入一个或两个Nucleus设备的两个队列的数据。监测植入后2年内的主要不良事件(需要另一次手术/住院治疗)和次要不良事件(单独使用药物治疗或接受不需要手术或住院的预期疗程),并通过听力测定阈值和父母报告来衡量结果收集IT-MAIS和LittlEARS问卷。结果显示,41名儿童发生了60起不良事件,植入了227只耳朵(26%),其中11名儿童发生了14起主要事件;所有事件都是暂时的并已解决。所有结果指标均显示使用人工耳蜗改善听力。研究结果表明,该程序对婴儿是安全的,并且它们显示出人工耳蜗植入的明显益处,包括增加的听觉和听力发育。
    This multi-center study examined the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children between 9 and 11 months of age. The intended impact was to support practice regarding candidacy assessment and prognostic counseling of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Data in the clinical chart of children implanted at 9-11 months of age with Cochlear Ltd devices at five cochlear implant centers in the United States and Canada were included in analyses. The study included data from two cohorts implanted with one or two Nucleus devices during the periods of January 1, 2012-December 31, 2017 (Cohort 1, n = 83) or between January 1, 2018 and May 15, 2020 (Cohort 2, n = 50). Major adverse events (requiring another procedure/hospitalization) and minor adverse events (managed with medication alone or underwent an expected course of treatment that did not require surgery or hospitalization) out to 2 years post-implant were monitored and outcomes measured by audiometric thresholds and parent-reports on the IT-MAIS and LittlEARS questionnaires were collected. Results revealed 60 adverse events in 41 children and 227 ears implanted (26%) of which 14 major events occurred in 11 children; all were transitory and resolved. Improved hearing with cochlear implant use was shown in all outcome measures. Findings reveal that the procedure is safe for infants and that they show clear benefits of cochlear implantation including increased audibility and hearing development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低度慢性炎症与许多与年龄相关的疾病有关。监测低度慢性炎症的非侵入性方法可能会改善预后较差的老年人的管理。这项纵向队列研究使用新蝶呤波动性在45名独立老年人(65-75岁)的每月尿液样本中确定了基线炎症。新蝶呤的测量,一种炎症代谢物,能够根据12个月内新蝶呤水平升高的频率,将个体分为风险类别.在基线测量听力(纯音测听),1年和3年的研究。结果表明,那些处于最高风险类别(新蝶呤增加超过50%的时间)的人出现了更大的恶化,特别是在高频,听证会。单向Welch的方差分析显示,高频听力变化的风险类别之间存在显着差异(W(3,19.6)=9.164,p=0.0005)。尽管研究规模和持续时间最高风险类别的个体比最低风险类别的个体具有额外的年龄相关发病率的可能性是两倍多。我们得出的结论是,尿液中新蝶呤的波动性可能会对听力损失进展风险最大的人群进行分层。
    Low-grade chronic inflammation is associated with many age-related conditions. Non-invasive methods to monitor low-grade chronic inflammation may improve the management of older people at risk of poorer outcomes. This longitudinal cohort study has determined baseline inflammation using neopterin volatility in monthly urine samples of 45 independent older adults (aged 65-75 years). Measurement of neopterin, an inflammatory metabolite, enabled stratification of individuals into risk categories based on how often in a 12-month period their neopterin level was raised. Hearing was measured (pure-tone audiometry) at baseline, 1 year and 3 years of the study. Results show that those in the highest risk category (neopterin raised greater than 50% of the time) saw greater deterioration, particularly in high-frequency, hearing. A one-way Welch\'s ANOVA showed a significant difference between the risk categories for change in high-frequency hearing (W (3, 19.6) = 9.164, p = 0.0005). Despite the study size and duration individuals in the highest risk category were more than twice as likely to have an additional age-related morbidity than those in the lowest risk category. We conclude that volatility of neopterin in urine may enable stratification of those at greatest risk of progression of hearing loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    几乎自一个世纪前现代电声测听计问世以来,纯音测听的结果就以听力图为特征。差不多这么多年来,临床医生和研究人员一直在寻找方法来提取听力图上的信息量和复杂性。常用的方法已经在各种频率范围内使用纯音平均值(PTA),其中500、1000、2000和4000Hz的PTA(PTA4)最广泛地用于听力损失严重程度的分类。这里,建议使用三位数三元组作为不仅严重性的单个数字摘要,而且听力损失的构型和双侧对称性。三元组中的每个数字范围从0到9,随着纯音听力阈值水平(HTL)的水平从最佳听力范围(<10dB听力水平;HL)增加到完全听力损失(≥90dBHL)。每个数字还代表听力图从左到右的不同频率区域:(低,L)500、1000和2000Hz的PTA;(中心,C)3000、4000和6000Hz的PTA;和(高,H)8000Hz时的HTL。该LCH三联听力图分类系统使用来自20至80岁以上的成年人的大型美国(U.S.)国家数据集(N=8,795)和两个大型临床数据集(总计8,254名成年人,涵盖相似年龄范围)进行评估。发现其捕获听力功能变化的能力优于广泛使用的PTA4。
    Almost since the inception of the modern-day electroacoustic audiometer a century ago the results of pure-tone audiometry have been characterized by an audiogram. For almost as many years, clinicians and researchers have sought ways to distill the volume and complexity of information on the audiogram. Commonly used approaches have made use of pure-tone averages (PTAs) for various frequency ranges with the PTA for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz (PTA4) being the most widely used for the categorization of hearing loss severity. Here, a three-digit triad is proposed as a single-number summary of not only the severity, but also the configuration and bilateral symmetry of the hearing loss. Each digit in the triad ranges from 0 to 9, increasing as the level of the pure-tone hearing threshold level (HTL) increases from a range of optimal hearing (< 10 dB Hearing Level; HL) to complete hearing loss (≥ 90 dB HL). Each digit also represents a different frequency region of the audiogram proceeding from left to right as: (Low, L) PTA for 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz; (Center, C) PTA for 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz; and (High, H) HTL at 8000 Hz. This LCH Triad audiogram-classification system is evaluated using a large United States (U.S.) national dataset (N = 8,795) from adults 20 to 80 + years of age and two large clinical datasets totaling 8,254 adults covering a similar age range. Its ability to capture variations in hearing function was found to be superior to that of the widely used PTA4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨影响中重度听力损失老年患者使用助听器依从性的因素。
    方法:这种观察,prospective,单中心研究纳入中度至重度听力损失患者.在安装一个或两个HA之前和一年后对它们进行了评估。
    结果:共有86名患者被纳入研究,其中69.8%(86人中的60名;用户组)在拟合后1年继续使用他们的HA;6名患者没有继续使用他们的HA(非用户)。用户组比非用户组年轻,但差异不显著。USER组在基线时的独立听觉阈值明显优于NON-USER组。HA的使用导致语音测听和听觉阈值的改善。用户组也有认知功能的维持。
    结论:使用HA1年可改善听觉表现,并无认知功能恶化。试验注册:这项研究是回顾性注册的。NCT04333043在ClinicalTrials.gov(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/)于2020年3月26日。本研究已在VastaEmiliaNord地区伦理委员会注册,编号104,批准日期2017年7月17日。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate which factors influence the adherence to hearing aid (HA) use in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    METHODS: This observational, prospective, single-centre study enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. They were evaluated before and 1 year after having either one or two HAs fitted.
    RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled in the study and of these 69.8% (60 of 86; USER group) continued to use their HA at 1 year after fitting; six patients had not continued their use (NON-USERS). The USER group was younger than the NON-USER group, but the difference was not significant. The USER group had a significantly better unaided auditory threshold at baseline than the NON-USER group. HA use resulted in improvements in speech audiometry and auditory threshold. There was also a maintenance of cognitive function in the USER group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of HA for 1 year resulted in improved auditory performance and an absence of a deterioration of cognitive function.Trial registration: This research was retrospectively registered under no. NCT04333043 at ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/) on the 26 March 2020. This research has been registered with the Ethics Committee of the Area Vasta Emilia Nord under number 104, date of approval 17/07/2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在控制所有听阈,包括扩展高频(EHF),呈现不同难度水平的刺激,并测量脑电图(EEG)和瞳孔测量反应,以确定耳鸣患者的听力困难是否与努力或疲劳有关。
    方法:包括21名慢性耳鸣患者和26名具有正常纯音平均值和对称听阈的匹配健康对照。受试者用0.125-20kHz纯音测听法进行评估,蒙特利尔认知评估测试(MoCA)耳鸣障碍清单(THI),脑电图,和瞳孔测量。
    结果:在所有听音条件下,耳鸣患者在“编码”阶段的瞳孔扩张和脑电图α功率较少(p<0.05)。此外,对于所有听力条件和THI或MoCA,EEG和瞳孔测量分量之间没有统计学上的显着关系(p>.05)。
    结论:各种听力条件下的EEG和瞳孔测量结果表明耳鸣患者即使所有频率,也有潜在的听力努力。包括EHFs,被控制。此外,我们建议在与自主神经系统相关的疾病如耳鸣时,应谨慎进行瞳孔测量。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to control all hearing thresholds, including extended high frequencies (EHFs), presents stimuli of varying difficulty levels, and measures electroencephalography (EEG) and pupillometry responses to determine whether listening difficulty in tinnitus patients is effort or fatigue-related.
    METHODS: Twenty-one chronic tinnitus patients and 26 matched healthy controls having normal pure-tone averages with symmetrical hearing thresholds were included. Subjects were evaluated with 0.125-20 kHz pure-tone audiometry, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), EEG, and pupillometry.
    RESULTS: Pupil dilatation and EEG alpha power during the \"encoding\" phase of the presented sentence in tinnitus patients were less in all listening conditions (p < .05). Also, there was no statistically significant relationship between EEG and pupillometry components for all listening conditions and THI or MoCA (p > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: EEG and pupillometry results under various listening conditions indicate potential listening effort in tinnitus patients even if all frequencies, including EHFs, are controlled. Also, we suggest that pupillometry should be interpreted with caution in autonomic nervous system-related conditions such as tinnitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与采用常规测听法和实耳测量的标准方法相比,由于其减少了资源和设备需求,因此将原位测听法用于助听器配件具有吸引力。然而,它的有效性一直是争论的主题,正如以前的研究指出,使用常规测听法和原位测听法测量的听力阈值之间存在差异。对于开放式助听器,差异尤其显着,归因于由通风口引起的低频泄漏。这里,通过三个实验,对来自不同制造商的六个听管式助听器进行了原位测听。在实验I中,测量助听器增益,以调查是否对规定的目标增益实施校正.在实验二,记录原位刺激,以调查校正是否直接纳入递送的原位刺激.最后,在实验三,使用原位测听法和常规测听法的听力阈值是通过佩戴开放式助听器的真实患者进行测量的。结果表明,(1)助听器增益保持不受影响,当用原位或常规测听法测量所有的开放配合测量,(2)除了一个助听器外,所有开放式助听器在低于1000Hz的频率下将原位刺激调整为30dB,它还建议在所有现场测量中使用封闭的圆顶,(3)对于250至6000Hz之间的频率,参与者之间的平均阈值差异在5dB以内。结果清楚地表明,现代测量的原位阈值与常规测量的阈值一致(在5dB以内),表明原位测听用于远程听力护理的潜力。
    The use of in-situ audiometry for hearing aid fitting is appealing due to its reduced resource and equipment requirements compared to standard approaches employing conventional audiometry alongside real-ear measures. However, its validity has been a subject of debate, as previous studies noted differences between hearing thresholds measured using conventional and in-situ audiometry. The differences were particularly notable for open-fit hearing aids, attributed to low-frequency leakage caused by the vent. Here, in-situ audiometry was investigated for six receiver-in-canal hearing aids from different manufacturers through three experiments. In Experiment I, the hearing aid gain was measured to investigate whether corrections were implemented to the prescribed target gain. In Experiment II, the in-situ stimuli were recorded to investigate if corrections were directly incorporated to the delivered in-situ stimulus. Finally, in Experiment III, hearing thresholds using in-situ and conventional audiometry were measured with real patients wearing open-fit hearing aids. Results indicated that (1) the hearing aid gain remained unaffected when measured with in-situ or conventional audiometry for all open-fit measurements, (2) the in-situ stimuli were adjusted for up to 30 dB at frequencies below 1000 Hz for all open-fit hearing aids except one, which also recommends the use of closed domes for all in-situ measurements, and (3) the mean interparticipant threshold difference fell within 5 dB for frequencies between 250 and 6000 Hz. The results clearly indicated that modern measured in-situ thresholds align (within 5 dB) with conventional thresholds measured, indicating the potential of in-situ audiometry for remote hearing care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    年长的听众很难处理对单词辨别很重要的时间线索,和不足的处理可能会限制他们从这些线索中受益的能力。这里,我们调查了衰老对辅音转换的感知和神经表现的影响,以及有助于成功感知的因素。为了进一步了解从脑干到皮层的处理变化的潜在神经机制,我们还研究了导致大脑皮层振幅增大的因素.我们招募了30名年轻听力正常的参与者和30名年龄较大的听力正常的参与者,他们符合临床听力正常的标准。在辅音转换持续时间的7步连续体中,获得了BEAT和WHEAT单词的感知识别函数。记录听性脑干对点击刺激的反应(ABR),并记录频率跟随反应(FFR)和皮层听觉诱发电位到BEAT-WHEAT连续体的终点。识别BEAT的感知性能与WHEAT在年轻和年长的听众之间没有差异。然而,皮质下和皮质下的神经表征测量显示年龄组差异,因此,与年轻听众相比,年龄较大的FFR锁相较低,但皮质振幅(P1和N1)较高.ABR波I振幅和FFR相位锁定,但不是测听阈值,预测早期皮质振幅。相位锁定到过渡区域和早期皮层峰值幅度(P1)预测了感知识别功能的性能。总的来说,结果表明,过渡持续时间的神经表现和皮质过度补偿可能有助于感知过渡持续时间对比的能力。皮质过度补偿似乎是对神经放电/同步性降低的适应不良反应。
    Older listeners have difficulty processing temporal cues that are important for word discrimination, and deficient processing may limit their ability to benefit from these cues. Here, we investigated aging effects on perception and neural representation of the consonant transition and the factors that contribute to successful perception. To further understand the neural mechanisms underlying the changes in processing from brainstem to cortex, we also examined the factors that contribute to exaggerated amplitudes in cortex. We enrolled 30 younger normal-hearing and 30 older normal-hearing participants who met the criteria of clinically normal hearing. Perceptual identification functions were obtained for the words BEAT and WHEAT on a 7-step continuum of consonant-transition duration. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded to click stimuli and frequency-following responses (FFRs) and cortical auditory-evoked potentials were recorded to the endpoints of the BEAT-WHEAT continuum. Perceptual performance for identification of BEAT vs. WHEAT did not differ between younger and older listeners. However, both subcortical and cortical measures of neural representation showed age group differences, such that FFR phase locking was lower but cortical amplitudes (P1 and N1) were higher in older compared to younger listeners. ABR Wave I amplitude and FFR phase locking, but not audiometric thresholds, predicted early cortical amplitudes. Phase locking to the transition region and early cortical peak amplitudes (P1) predicted performance on the perceptual identification function. Overall, results suggest that the neural representation of transition durations and cortical overcompensation may contribute to the ability to perceive transition duration contrasts. Cortical overcompensation appears to be a maladaptive response to decreased neural firing/synchrony.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号