BACKGROUND: Dysferlin-deficient limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B (Dysf) mice are notorious for their mild phenotype. Raising plasma total cholesterol (CHOL) via apolipoprotein E (ApoE) knockout (KO) drastically exacerbates muscle wasting in Dysf mice. However, dysferlinopathic patients have abnormally reduced plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. The current study aimed to determine whether HDL-C lowering can exacerbate the mild phenotype of dysferlin-null mice.
METHODS: Human cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), a plasma lipid transfer protein not found in mice that reduces HDL-C, and/or its optimal adapter protein human apolipoprotein B (ApoB), were overexpressed in Dysf mice. Mice received a 2% cholesterol diet from 2 months of age and characterized through ambulatory and hanging functional tests, plasma analyses, and muscle histology.
RESULTS: CETP/ApoB expression in Dysf mice caused reduced HDL-C (54.5%) and elevated ratio of CHOL/HDL-C (181.3%) compared to control Dysf mice in plasma, but without raising CHOL. Compared to the severe muscle pathology found in high CHOL Dysf/ApoE double knockout mice, Dysf/CETP/ApoB mice did not show significant changes in ambulation, hanging capacity, increases in damaged area, collagen deposition, or decreases in cross-sectional area and healthy myofibre coverage.
CONCLUSIONS: CETP/ApoB over-expression in Dysf mice decreases HDL-C without increasing CHOL or exacerbating muscle pathology. High CHOL or nonHDL-C caused by ApoE KO, rather than low HDL-C, likely lead to rodent muscular dystrophy phenotype humanization.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a respiratory disorder of obscure etiology and limited treatment options, possibly linked to dysregulation in lipid metabolism. While several observational studies suggest that lipid-lowering agents may decrease the risk of IPF, the evidence is inconsistent. The present Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to determine the association between circulating lipid traits and IPF and to assess the potential influence of lipid-modifying medications for IPF.
METHODS: Summary statistics of 5 lipid traits (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A, and apolipoprotein B) and IPF were sourced from the UK Biobank and FinnGen Project Round 10. The study\'s focus on lipid-regulatory genes encompassed PCSK9, NPC1L1, ABCG5, ABCG8, HMGCR, APOB, LDLR, CETP, ANGPTL3, APOC3, LPL, and PPARA. The primary effect estimates were determined using the inverse-variance-weighted method, with additional analyses employing the contamination mixture method, robust adjusted profile score, the weighted median, weighted mode methods, and MR-Egger. Summary-data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) was used to confirm significant lipid-modifying drug targets, leveraging data on expressed quantitative trait loci in relevant tissues. Sensitivity analyses included assessments of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out methods.
RESULTS: There was no significant effect of blood lipid traits on IPF risk (all P＞0.05). Drug-target MR analysis indicated that genetic mimicry for inhibitor of NPC1L1, PCSK9, ABCG5, ABCG8, and APOC3 were associated with increased IPF risks, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as follows: 2.74 (1.05-7.12, P = 0.039), 1.36 (1.02-1.82, P = 0.037), 1.66 (1.12-2.45, P = 0.011), 1.68 (1.14-2.48, P = 0.009), and 1.42 (1.20-1.67, P = 3.17×10-5), respectively. The SMR method identified a significant association between PCSK9 gene expression in whole blood and reduced IPF risk (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99, P = 0.043). Sensitivity analyses showed no evidence of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipid traits did not significantly affect the risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Drug targets MR studies examining 12 lipid-modifying drugs indicated that PCSK9 inhibitors could dramatically increase IPF risk, a mechanism that may differ from their lipid-lowering actions and thus warrants further investigation.

The incidence rate of Parkinson\'s disease ranks the second among degenerative diseases of the nervous system, only lower than Alzheimer\'s disease. Early-onset Parkinson\'s disease (EPOD) refers to Parkinson\'s disease with initial symptoms appearing before the age of 50. EOPD is associated with certain genetic mutations and has distinct clinical features. This study reports a case of EOPD with mutations in both the PRKN and the APOB genes. The patient presented with the initial symptom of unstable walking at the age of 28, followed by bradykinesia, limb tremors, masked face, shuffling gait, and cogwheel rigidity in both upper limbs. The blood lipid test showed total cholesterol of 6.48 mmol/L and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 4.13 mmol/L. Genetic testing showed a deletion in exon 5 and a point mutation [c.850G>C(p.Gly284Arg)] in exon 7 of the PRKN gene, as well as a point mutation [c.10579C>T(p.Arg3527Trp)] in exon 26 of the APOB gene. Based on these clinical manifestations and examination results, the patient was diagnosed with EOPD. The compound heterozygous mutations in the PRKN gene, as well as the combined mutations in the PRKN and APOB genes, are both reported for the first time, expanding the spectrum of genetic mutations associated with EOPD.
帕金森病的发病率位居神经系统退行性疾病的第二，仅次于阿尔茨海默病。早发型帕金森病(early-onset Parkinson’s disease，EOPD)指50岁前出现首发症状的帕金森病。EOPD与基因突变有一定的关系，并有独特的临床特征。本文报告1例PRKN基因合并APOB基因突变的EOPD，该患者于28岁时出现行走不稳的首发症状，后续出现动作迟缓、四肢震颤等症状。体格检查示：面具脸，慌张步态，双上肢肌张力齿轮样增高。总胆固醇6.48 mmol/L，低密度脂蛋白胆固醇4.13 mmol/L。PRKN基因外显子5缺失，外显子7点突变[c.850G>C(p.Gly284Arg)]；APOB基因外显子26点突变[c.10579C>T(p.Arg3527Trp)]。根据上述临床表现及检查结果，该患者被诊断为EOPD。PRKN基因的复合杂合突变及PRKN基因合并APOB基因突变均为首次报道，这丰富了EOPD的基因突变类型谱。.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the correlation between asthma risk and genetic variants affecting the expression or function of lipid-lowering drug targets.
METHODS: We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using variants in several genes associated with lipid-lowering medication targets: HMGCR (statin target), PCSK9 (alirocumab target), NPC1L1 (ezetimibe target), APOB (mipomersen target), ANGPTL3 (evinacumab target), PPARA (fenofibrate target), and APOC3 (volanesorsen target), as well as LDLR and LPL. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between lipid-lowering drugs and asthma through MR. Finally, we assessed the efficacy and stability of the MR analysis using the MR Egger and inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods.
RESULTS: The elevated triglyceride (TG) levels associated with the APOC3, and LPL targets were found to increase asthma risk. Conversely, higher LDL-C levels driven by LDLR were found to decrease asthma risk. Additionally, LDL-C levels (driven by APOB, NPC1L1 and HMGCR targets) and TG levels (driven by the LPL target) were associated with improved lung function (FEV1/FVC). LDL-C levels driven by PCSK9 were associated with decreased lung function (FEV1/FVC).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings suggest a likely causal relationship between asthma and lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, there is compelling evidence indicating that lipid-lowering therapies could play a crucial role in the future management of asthma.

Despite data suggesting that apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement outperforms low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level measurement in predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, apoB measurement has not become widely adopted into routine clinical practice. One barrier for use of apoB measurement is lack of consistent guidance for clinicians on how to interpret and apply apoB results in clinical context. Whereas guidelines have often provided clear low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets or triggers to initiate treatment change, consistent targets for apoB are lacking. In this review, we synthesize existing data regarding the epidemiology of apoB by comparing guideline recommendations regarding use of apoB measurement, describing population percentiles of apoB relative to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, summarizing studies of discordance between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apoB levels, and evaluating apoB levels in clinical trials of lipid-lowering therapy to guide potential treatment targets. We propose evidence-guided apoB thresholds for use in cholesterol management and clinical care.

BACKGROUND: Defining lipid goals solely on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in Indian population may cause misclassification due to high prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia and small dense LDL-C particles. International guidelines now recommend Apoliporotein-B (Apo-B) and non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels as alternative targets. In this study, we used a cross-sectional representative population database to determine Apo-B and non-HDL-C cut-offs corresponding to identified LDL-C targets and compared them to international guidelines.
METHODS: A community-based survey carried out in urban Delhi and adjacent rural Ballabhgarh provided lipid values for 3047 individuals. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the degree of relationship between Apo-B and LDL-C and non-HDL-C. Cut-off values for Apo-B and non-HDL-C were established using receiver operator curve analysis correlating with guideline-recommended LDL-C targets.
RESULTS: Spearman\'s rank correlations between Apo-B and LDL-C (0.82) and non-HDL-C and LDL-C (0.93) were significant (p < 0.05). Proposed corresponding cut-off values for LDL-C of 55, 70,100,130 and 160 mg/dl for Apo-B and non-HDL-C in our population were 75.3, 75.5, 91.3, 107.6, 119.4 mg/dL and 92.5,96.5, 123.5, 154.5, 179.5 mg/dL respectively. However, in those with triglycerides >150 mg/dl the corresponding Apo-B and non-HDL-C values were 85.1, 92.7, 103.5, 117.5 and 135 mg/dL and 124.5, 126.5, 147.5, 167.5 and 190.5 mg/L respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study we provide Apo-B and non-HDL cut-offs corresponding to target LDL-C values in Indian patients with and without high triglycerides. It is noted that in individuals with triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dl, the Apo-B levels are much higher than the values recommended by guidelines.

UNASSIGNED: Although apolipoprotein B (apoB) is a superior marker of lipid-related risk compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), few data exist to translate the goals and thresholds from LDL-C to their apoB equivalent. In addition, although current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines provide a relative indication for apoB measurement among individuals with hypertriglyceridemia, whether discordance is limited to those subgroups is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the variability in apoB level across the spectrum of LDL-C or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels and evaluate whether discordance between apoB and LDL-C or non-HDL-C is limited to specifiable subgroups.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study used data from a nationally representative sample of 12 688 adult participants not using statins in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2005 and 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from April 2023 to February 2024.
UNASSIGNED: Quantile regression was used to assess the population distribution of apoB across LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels. Discordance between apoB and LDL-C was the difference between measured apoB and median apoB levels for an individual\'s LDL-C level. Discordance was evaluated by age, sex, race and ethnicity, obesity, diabetes, triglyceride level, hemoglobin A1c level, body mass index (BMI), statin use, and metabolic health (defined as a BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, triglyceride level <150 mg/dL, and no diabetes).
UNASSIGNED: Among the sample of 12 688 participants (median age, 41.0 years [IQR, 29.0-54.0 years]; 52.9% women) for LDL-C values of 55, 70, 100, and 190 mg/dL, the corresponding population median apoB levels were 49, 60, 80, and 140 mg/dL, respectively. For given levels of LDL-C, a range of apoB values was observed. At an LDL-C level of 100 mg/dL, the 95% population distribution of apoB ranged from 66 mg/dL to 99 mg/dL. ApoB variability was highest for LDL-C values estimated using the Friedewald equation, lower when using Sampson or Martin-Hopkins equations, and lowest for non-HDL-C. Although individuals with metabolic risk factors were more likely to have discordantly high apoB levels (ie, had higher median observed apoB levels relative to what was estimated based on LDL-C), significant variability in apoB levels was observed even among metabolically healthy individuals.
UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that even metabolically healthy individuals may have discordantly high apoB levels relative to LDL-C or non-HDL-C levels. The current guideline approach for apoB testing only for those with hypertriglyceridemia appears too narrow. Population percentile data can be used to translate LDL-C goals and thresholds to their apoB equivalent to facilitate clinical adoption.

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia frequently coexists with hypertension in the population. Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) is increasingly considered a more potent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Abnormal levels of serum ApoB can potentially impact the mortality risk.
METHODS: The prospective cohort study employed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which was performed between 2005 and 2016, with follow-ups extended until December 2019. Serum ApoB concentrations were quantified using nephelometry. In line with the NHANES descriptions and recommendations, the reference ranges for ApoB concentrations are 55-140 and 55-125 mg/dL for men and women, respectively. Participants were categorized into low, normal, and high ApoB levels. The low and high groups were combined into the abnormal group. In this study, all-cause mortality (ACM) and CVD mortality (CVM) were the endpoints. Survey-weighted cox hazards models were used for evaluating the correlation between serum ApoB levels and ACM and CVM. A generalized additive model (GAM) was employed to examine the dose-dependent relationship between ApoB levels and mortality risk.
RESULTS: After a median of 95 (interquartile range: 62-135) months of follow-up, 986 all-cause and 286 CVD deaths were recorded. The abnormal ApoB group exhibited a trend toward an elevated risk of ACM in relative to the normal group (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.96-1.53). The risk of CVM was elevated by 76% in the ApoB abnormal group (HR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.28-2.42). According to the GAM, there existed a nonlinear association between serum ApoB levels and ACM (P = 0.005) and CVM (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: In the US hypertensive population, serum Apo B levels were U-shaped and correlated with ACM and CVM risk, with the lowest risk at 100 mg/dL. Importantly, abnormal Apo B levels were related to an elevated risk of ACM and CVM. These risks were especially high at lower Apo B levels. The obtained findings emphasize the importance of maintaining appropriate Apo B levels to prevent adverse outcomes in hypertensive individuals.

BACKGROUND: Remnant cholesterol (RC) and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C) are key risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with apolipoprotein B (apoB) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] also contributing to its residual risk. However, real-world population-based evidence regarding the impact of current clinical LDL-C-centric lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) on achieving RC and nonHDL-C goals, as well as on modifying residual CVD risk factors is limited.
METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 897 CVD patients from September, 2020 to July, 2021. All participants had previously received low-/moderate-intensity LLT and were discharged with either low-/moderate-intensity LLT or high-intensity LLT. After a median follow-up of 3 months, changes in RC, nonHDL-C, and other biomarkers were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the impact of the LLT on goal attainment.
RESULTS: Among all patients, 83.50% transitioned to high-intensity LLT from low or moderate. After follow-up, the high-intensity group saw significantly greater reductions in RC (-20.51% vs. -3.90%, P = 0.025), nonHDL-C (-25.12% vs. 0.00%, P < 0.001), apoB (-19.35% vs. -3.17%, P < 0.001), triglycerides (-17.82% vs. -6.62%, P < 0.001), and LDL-C and total cholesterol. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that LDL-C reduction from current LLT was strongly correlated with nonHDL-C reduction (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). Patients who received high-intensity LLT had significant improvements in attainment of RC (from 44.2% to 60.7%, χ² = 39.23, P < 0.001) and nonHDL-C (from 19.4% to 56.9%, χ² = 226.06, P < 0.001) goals. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression showed that high-intensity LLT was a protective factor for RC [odds ratio (OR) = 0.66; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.45-0.97; P = 0.033] and nonHDL-C goal attainment (OR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75; P < 0.001), without a significant increase of adverse reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: Current levels of clinically prescribed LDL-C-centric treatment can reduce RC and other lipid-related residual risk factors, but high-intensity LLT is better at achieving nonHDL-C and RC goals than low-/moderate-intensity LLT, with a good safety profile. More targeted RC treatments are still needed to reduce residual lipid risk further.