Anti-seizure medication

抗癫痫药物
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:关于抗癫痫药物(ASM)安全性的高质量证据的利用受到缺乏标准化报告的限制。本研究旨在使用真实世界数据检查ASM的安全性。(2)方法:数据收集自2012年至2021年的韩国不良事件报告系统数据库(KAERS-DB)。总的来说,分析46,963例药物不良反应(ADR)-药物对。(3)结果:在系统器官类别级别,最常见的钠通道阻滞剂(SCB)类别是皮肤(37.9%),神经学(16.7%),和精神病(9.7%)。对于非SCB,这些是神经学的(31.2%),胃肠道(22.0%),和精神疾病(18.2%)。SCBs最常见的不良反应是皮疹(17.8%),瘙痒(8.2%),和头晕(6.7%)。非SCB与头晕有关(23.7%),嗜睡(13.0%),恶心(6.3%)。皮疹,瘙痒,出现荨麻疹,平均而言,两天后,SCB与非SCB进行了比较。性/生殖障碍的报告频率为0.23%。SCB被报告为病因的频率高于非SCB(59.8%vs.40.2%,费希尔的精确检验,p<0.0001)。(4)结论:基于现实世界的数据,ASM的安全性被确定.与非SCB诱导的ADR相比,SCB诱导的ADR表现出不同的模式。
    (1) Background: The utilization of high-quality evidence regarding the safety of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is constrained by the absence of standardized reporting. This study aims to examine the safety profile of ASMs using real-world data. (2) Methods: The data were collected from the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KAERS-DB) between 2012 and 2021. In total, 46,963 adverse drug reaction (ADR)-drug pairs were analyzed. (3) Results: At the system organ class level, the most frequently reported classes for sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were skin (37.9%), neurological (16.7%), and psychiatric disorders (9.7%). For non-SCBs, these were neurological (31.2%), gastrointestinal (22.0%), and psychiatric disorders (18.2%). The most common ADRs induced by SCBs were rash (17.8%), pruritus (8.2%), and dizziness (6.7%). Non-SCBs were associated with dizziness (23.7%), somnolence (13.0%), and nausea (6.3%). Rash, pruritus, and urticaria occurred, on average, two days later with SCBs compared to non-SCBs. Sexual/reproductive disorders were reported at a frequency of 0.23%. SCBs were reported as the cause more frequently than non-SCBs (59.8% vs. 40.2%, Fisher\'s exact test, p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: Based on real-world data, the safety profiles of ASMs were identified. The ADRs induced by SCBs exhibited different patterns when compared to those induced by non-SCBs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癫痫是一种以反复发作为特征的神经系统疾病,影响全球超过6500万人。治疗通常从使用抗癫痫药物开始,包括单一疗法和多疗法。如果这些失败,更具侵入性的治疗方法,如手术,电刺激和局灶性药物递送通常被认为是为了使患者无癫痫发作。虽然很大一部分最终受益于这些治疗方案,治疗反应经常随着时间的推移而波动。这些时间变化背后的生理机制知之甚少,使预后成为治疗癫痫的重大挑战。在这里,我们使用癫痫发作过渡的动态网络模型来了解癫痫发作倾向如何随着时间的推移而随着兴奋性的变化而变化。通过计算机模拟,我们探讨了治疗对动态网络特性的影响与其随时间的脆弱性之间的关系,这些脆弱性允许患者恢复到高发作倾向状态.对于小型网络,我们表明漏洞可以通过第一个传递组件(FTC)的大小来完全表征。对于更大的网络,我们找到了网络效率的衡量标准,不相干和异质性(程度方差)与网络对增加兴奋性的鲁棒性相关。这些结果为癫痫的治疗干预提供了一组潜在的预后标志物。这些标记可用于支持个性化治疗策略的开发,最终有助于理解长期癫痫发作的自由。
    Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures, affecting over 65 million people worldwide. Treatment typically commences with the use of anti-seizure medications, including both mono- and poly-therapy. Should these fail, more invasive therapies such as surgery, electrical stimulation and focal drug delivery are often considered in an attempt to render the person seizure free. Although a significant portion ultimately benefit from these treatment options, treatment responses often fluctuate over time. The physiological mechanisms underlying these temporal variations are poorly understood, making prognosis a significant challenge when treating epilepsy. Here we use a dynamic network model of seizure transition to understand how seizure propensity may vary over time as a consequence of changes in excitability. Through computer simulations, we explore the relationship between the impact of treatment on dynamic network properties and their vulnerability over time that permit a return to states of high seizure propensity. For small networks we show vulnerability can be fully characterised by the size of the first transitive component (FTC). For larger networks, we find measures of network efficiency, incoherence and heterogeneity (degree variance) correlate with robustness of networks to increasing excitability. These results provide a set of potential prognostic markers for therapeutic interventions in epilepsy. Such markers could be used to support the development of personalized treatment strategies, ultimately contributing to understanding of long-term seizure freedom.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CDKL5缺乏症(CDD)是一种罕见的发育性和癫痫性脑病。加奈索酮,一种神经活性类固醇,减少儿童的主要运动性癫痫发作的频率。本分析探讨了加奈索酮对非癫痫结局的影响。在一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验中,儿童(2-19岁)具有遗传证实的CDD和每月≥16次主要运动性癫痫发作。加奈索酮或安慰剂每天给药3次,共17周。行为是用焦虑来衡量的,抑郁和情绪量表(ADAMS)白天嗜睡与儿童健康睡眠问卷,和生活质量的生活质量量表-残疾(QI-残疾)量表。使用方差分析比较分数,根据年龄调整,性别,抗癫痫调解的数量,基线28天主要运动性癫痫发作频率,基线发展技能,和行为,睡眠或生活质量评分。101名儿童CDD(39个临床站点,8个国家)被随机分配。年龄中位数(IQR)为6(3-10)岁,79.2%为女性,50人接受了加奈索酮。经过17周的治疗,与安慰剂组相比,加奈索酮组的躁狂/多动评分(平均差1.27,95CI-2.38,-0.16)和强迫行为评分(平均差0.58,95CI-1.14,-0.01)较低(改善)。两组白天嗜睡评分相似。加奈索酮组儿童QOL评分的总变化比安慰剂组高2.6分(95CI-1.74,7.02)(改善),但无统计学意义。随着更好的癫痫发作控制,与安慰剂相比,接受加奈索酮治疗的儿童在特定领域的行为评分有所改善.
    CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD) is a rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Ganaxolone, a neuroactive steroid, reduces the frequency of major motor seizures in children with CDD. This analysis explored the effect of ganaxolone on non-seizure outcomes. Children (2-19 years) with genetically confirmed CDD and ≥ 16 major motor seizures per month were enrolled in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ganaxolone or placebo was administered three times daily for 17 weeks. Behaviour was measured with the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale (ADAMS), daytime sleepiness with the Child Health Sleep Questionnaire, and quality of life with the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) scale. Scores were compared using ANOVA, adjusted for age, sex, number of anti-seizure mediations, baseline 28-day major motor seizure frequency, baseline developmental skills, and behaviour, sleep or quality of life scores. 101 children with CDD (39 clinical sites, 8 countries) were randomized. Median (IQR) age was 6 (3-10) years, 79.2 % were female, and 50 received ganaxolone. After 17 weeks of treatment, Manic/Hyperactive scores (mean difference 1.27, 95%CI -2.38,-0.16) and Compulsive Behaviour scores (mean difference 0.58, 95%CI -1.14,-0.01) were lower (improved) in the ganaxolone group compared with the placebo group. Daytime sleepiness scores were similar between groups. The total change in QOL score for children in the ganaxolone group was 2.6 points (95%CI -1.74,7.02) higher (improved) than in the placebo group but without statistical significance. Along with better seizure control, children who received ganaxolone had improved behavioural scores in select domains compared to placebo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据潜在的病因和癫痫类型,癫痫患者的疾病负担可能有很大差异。本分析旨在比较与癫痫相关的结节性硬化症(TSC)成人的直接和间接成本和生活质量(QoL)。特发性全身性癫痫(IGE),和德国的局灶性癫痫(FE)。
    方法:对92例TSC合并癫痫患者的问卷进行年龄和性别匹配,在独立研究中收集的92例IGE患者和92例FE患者的反应。对主要QoL成分进行了比较,直接费用(患者就诊,药物使用,医疗设备,诊断程序,辅助治疗,和运输成本),间接成本(就业,减少工作时间,错过的日子),和护理水平成本。
    结果:在所有三个队列中,平均直接总成本(TSC:7602欧元[中位数2620欧元];IGE:1919欧元[中位数446欧元],P<0.001;FE:2598欧元[中位数892欧元],P<0.001)和3个月内生产率损失导致的平均间接总成本(TSC:7185欧元[中位数11,925欧元];IGE:3599欧元[中位数0欧元],P<0.001;FE:5082欧元[中位数2981欧元],P=0.03)在TSC患者中最高。失业的TSC患者的比例(60%)明显大于IGE患者的比例(23%,P<0.001)或FE(34%,P=P<0.001)失业人员。5个维度和3个级别的EuroQuol量表的指数得分TSC患者(时间权衡[TTO]:0.705,视觉模拟量表[VAS]:0.577)明显低于IGE患者(TTO:0.897,VAS:0.813;P<0.001)或FE(TTO:0.879,VAS:0.769;P<0.001)。TSC患者修订后的癫痫病耻感量表评分(3.97)也显著高于IGE患者(1.48,P<0.001)或FE患者(2.45,P<0.001)。TSC(57.7)和FE(57.6)患者的癫痫总体生活质量量表-31项评分明显低于IGE患者(66.6,P=0.004)。在癫痫的神经障碍抑郁量表(TSC:13.1;IGE:11.2,P=0.009)和利物浦不良事件概况评分(TSC:42.7;IGE:37.5,P=0.017)中,TSC和IGE患者之间也存在显着差异,在两个问卷中,TSC患者的得分更高,结果更差。
    结论:这项研究是第一个比较TSC患者,IGE,和德国的FE,并强调了TSC患者过重的QoL负担以及直接和间接成本负担。
    BACKGROUND: Depending on the underlying etiology and epilepsy type, the burden of disease for patients with seizures can vary significantly. This analysis aimed to compare direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QoL) among adults with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) related with epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and focal epilepsy (FE) in Germany.
    METHODS: Questionnaire responses from 92 patients with TSC and epilepsy were matched by age and gender, with responses from 92 patients with IGE and 92 patients with FE collected in independent studies. Comparisons were made across the main QoL components, direct costs (patient visits, medication usage, medical equipment, diagnostic procedures, ancillary treatments, and transport costs), indirect costs (employment, reduced working hours, missed days), and care level costs.
    RESULTS: Across all three cohorts, mean total direct costs (TSC: €7602 [median €2620]; IGE: €1919 [median €446], P < 0.001; FE: €2598 [median €892], P < 0.001) and mean total indirect costs due to lost productivity over 3 months (TSC: €7185 [median €11,925]; IGE: €3599 [median €0], P < 0.001; FE: €5082 [median €2981], P = 0.03) were highest among patients with TSC. The proportion of patients with TSC who were unemployed (60%) was significantly larger than the proportions of patients with IGE (23%, P < 0.001) or FE (34%, P = P < 0.001) who were unemployed. Index scores for the EuroQuol Scale with 5 dimensions and 3 levels were significantly lower for patients with TSC (time-trade-off [TTO]: 0.705, visual analog scale [VAS]: 0.577) than for patients with IGE (TTO: 0.897, VAS: 0.813; P < 0.001) or FE (TTO: 0.879, VAS: 0.769; P < 0.001). Revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale scores were also significantly higher for patients with TSC (3.97) than for patients with IGE (1.48, P < 0.001) or FE (2.45, P < 0.001). Overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 items scores was significantly lower among patients with TSC (57.7) and FE (57.6) than among patients with IGE (66.6, P = 0.004 in both comparisons). Significant differences between patients with TSC and IGE were also determined for Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (TSC: 13.1; IGE: 11.2, P = 0.009) and Liverpool Adverse Events Profile scores (TSC: 42.7; IGE: 37.5, P = 0.017) with higher score and worse results for TSC patients in both questionnaires.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to compare patients with TSC, IGE, and FE in Germany and underlines the excessive QoL burden and both direct and indirect cost burdens experienced by patients with TSC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢波睡眠(SWS)与健康个体的言语和非言语/空间记忆高度相关,而且在癫痫患者中也是如此。然而,关于癫痫发作对过夜记忆保留的影响存在矛盾的发现,特别是关于程序和非语言记忆,并且缺少通过生态有效测试对情节记忆保留进行彻底检查。本研究探讨了SWS持续时间与癫痫相关因素的相互作用,以及SWS的光谱特性与程序过夜保留的关系,口头,和情景记忆。在癫痫监测单位,癫痫患者(N=40)接受学习,立即和12小时延迟测试手指敲击任务的记忆保持力(程序记忆),单词对任务(言语记忆),和创新的虚拟现实任务(情景记忆)。我们使用多元线性回归来检验SWS持续时间的影响,SWS的光谱特性,癫痫发作,药物,抑郁症,癫痫发作类型,性别,和癫痫持续时间对过夜记忆保持的影响。结果表明,没有一个候选变量显着预测程序记忆性能的过夜变化。为了口头记忆,强直-阵挛性癫痫发作的发生对记忆保留有负面影响,而较高的精神活性药物负荷显示出语言记忆保留较低的趋势.情景记忆受到癫痫持续时间的显著影响,显示潜在的非线性影响,持续时间长于10年,对内存性能产生负面影响。更高的抗癫痫药物载量与更好的过夜记忆保留有关。与预期相反,较长的SWS持续时间显示出情节记忆性能下降的趋势。对SWS期间记忆类型与EEG波段功率之间的关联进行的分析显示,右额区域的α波段功率较低,可作为更好的情景记忆保留的重要预测指标。总之,这项研究表明,记忆方式并不平等地受到重要的癫痫因素的影响,如癫痫的持续时间和药物,以及SWS光谱特征。
    Slow wave sleep (SWS) is highly relevant for verbal and non-verbal/spatial memory in healthy individuals, but also in people with epilepsy. However, contradictory findings exist regarding the effect of seizures on overnight memory retention, particularly relating to procedural and non-verbal memory, and thorough examination of episodic memory retention with ecologically valid tests is missing. This research explores the interaction of SWS duration with epilepsy-relevant factors, as well as the relation of spectral characteristics of SWS on overnight retention of procedural, verbal, and episodic memory. In an epilepsy monitoring unit, epilepsy patients (N = 40) underwent learning, immediate and 12 h delayed testing of memory retention for a fingertapping task (procedural memory), a word-pair task (verbal memory), and an innovative virtual reality task (episodic memory). We used multiple linear regression to examine the impact of SWS duration, spectral characteristics of SWS, seizure occurrence, medication, depression, seizure type, gender, and epilepsy duration on overnight memory retention. Results indicated that none of the candidate variables significantly predicted overnight changes for procedural memory performance. For verbal memory, the occurrence of tonic-clonic seizures negatively impacted memory retention and higher psychoactive medication load showed a tendency for lower verbal memory retention. Episodic memory was significantly impacted by epilepsy duration, displaying a potential nonlinear impact with a longer duration than 10 years negatively affecting memory performance. Higher drug load of anti-seizure medication was by tendency related to better overnight retention of episodic memory. Contrary to expectations longer SWS duration showed a trend towards decreased episodic memory performance. Analyses on associations between memory types and EEG band power during SWS revealed lower alpha-band power in the frontal right region as significant predictor for better episodic memory retention. In conclusion, this research reveals that memory modalities are not equally affected by important epilepsy factors such as duration of epilepsy and medication, as well as SWS spectral characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    性类固醇激素是癫痫女性(WWE)中出现的抑郁症的重要生物标志物,具有很好的预后潜力和治疗终点。因此,这项研究旨在探索性类固醇激素之间的关联,WWE中的抗癫痫药物(ASM)和抑郁症。
    使用基线问卷从一百一十二(112)WWE和50个年龄匹配的健康对照中获得社会人口统计学和临床特征。癫痫的诊断和脑电图(EEG)描述基于2017年国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)标准。在黄体期(LP)和卵泡期(FP)期间从病例和对照收集血液样品。Zung抑郁自评量表(ZSRDS)用于评估抑郁症。
    WWE中抑郁症的患病率为18.8%,与正规教育水平之间存在显著差异(p0.000),年龄(p0.000),病例和对照组的平均ZSRDS(p0.000)。在高睾酮方面,病例和对照组之间的激素水平存在统计学差异[3.28±9.99vs.0.31±0.30;p0.037],较低的FP催乳素[16.37±20.14vs.17.20±7.44;p0.778],和较低的LP催乳素[15.74±18.22vs.17.67±7.27;p0.473]。睾酮(p0.024),FP卵泡刺激素(FSH)(p0.009),FP雌二醇(p0.006),LPFSH(p0.031),LP孕酮(p0.023),LP催乳素(p0.000)与抑郁症有关。然而,只有催乳素(p0.042)和睾酮(p0.000)可预测WWE中的抑郁。
    平均抑郁评分较高,与对照组相比,病例中的催乳素水平较低,睾酮水平较高。此外,与左乙拉西坦(LEV)组相比,卡马西平(CBZ)组催乳素水平较低,睾酮水平较高.
    UNASSIGNED: Sex steroid hormones are emerging significant biomarkers of depression among Women with Epilepsy (WWE) with promising prognostic potential and therapeutic end point. Therefore, the study is aimed at exploring the association between sex steroids hormones, Anti-seizure Medication (ASM) and depression among WWE.
    UNASSIGNED: A baseline questionnaire was used to obtain socio-demographics and clinical characteristic from one hundred and twelve (112) WWE and 50 age matched healthy control. The diagnosis of epilepsy and Electroencephalography (EEG) description was based on 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. Blood samples were collected from cases and control during Luteal Phase (LP) and Follicular Phase (FP). The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSRDS) was used to assess depression.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of depression among WWE is 18.8%, with a significant difference between the level of formal education (p0.000), age (p0.000), and mean ZSRDS (p0.000) among cases and control. There is a statistical difference in hormonal levels between cases and control with regards to higher testosterone [3.28 ± 9.99 vs. 0.31 ± 0.30; p0.037], lower FP prolactin [16.37 ± 20.14 vs. 17.20 ± 7.44; p0.778], and lower LP prolactin [15.74 ± 18.22 vs. 17.67 ± 7.27; p0.473]. Testosterone (p0.024), FP Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) (p0.009), FP Estradiol (p0.006), LP FSH (p0.031), LP Progesterone (p0.023), and LP Prolactin (p0.000) were associated with depression. However, only prolactin (p0.042) and testosterone (p0.000) predicts depression among WWE.
    UNASSIGNED: There was higher mean depression score, lower prolactin and higher testosterone level among cases compared to control. Furthermore, there was lower prolactin and higher testosterone level in Carbamazepine (CBZ) group compared to Levetiracetam (LEV) groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建议创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者接受抗癫痫药物(ASM)作为创伤后癫痫发作(PTS)的预防。然而,ASM的利用,包括处方模式和相关的临床特征,在台湾是有限的。因此,本研究旨在探讨ASM趋势和临床特征。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了接受左乙拉西坦治疗的TBI患者,苯妥英,2012年至2019年期间,使用国家健康保险研究数据库在住院期间使用丙戊酸。主要结果是基于指数年的ASM趋势。左乙拉西坦处方的持续时间分为短期(7天或更短)或长期(超过7天)。Logistic回归确定了与长期使用相关的因素。共纳入64,461例TBI患者。左乙拉西坦的使用量逐年增加,而苯妥英下降。在左乙拉西坦用户中,5681(30.38%)为短期用户,13,016人(69.62%)为长期用户。挫伤的诊断,颅内出血,其他颅内损伤,接收操作,脑血管病史与病程较长显著相关.结论本研究揭示了左乙拉西坦使用量的上升趋势,表明其作为苯妥英替代品的潜力。病情更严重的TBI患者更有可能接受更长的处方。
    Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are recommended to receive anti-seizure medication (ASM) as posttraumatic seizure (PTS) prophylaxis. However, the utilization of ASM, including the prescription patterns and associated clinical characteristics, is limited in Taiwan. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the ASM trends and clinical characteristics. This retrospective cohort study enrolled TBI patients who received levetiracetam, phenytoin, and valproic acid during hospitalization using the National Health Insurance Research Database between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the trend of the ASMs based on the index year. The duration of levetiracetam prescription was categorized as short-term (seven days or less) or long-term (more than seven days). Logistic regression identified the factors associated with long-term usage. A total of 64,461 TBI patients were included. Levetiracetam usage increased yearly, while phenytoin declined. Among the levetiracetam users, 5681 (30.38%) were short-term users, and 13,016 (69.62%) were long-term users. Diagnoses of contusions, intracranial hemorrhage, other intracranial injuries, receiving operations, and a history of cerebrovascular disease were significantly associated with longer duration. Conclusions This study revealed the rising trend of levetiracetam usage, indicating its potential as an alternative to phenytoin. TBI patients with more severe conditions were more likely to receive longer prescriptions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,首次无源性癫痫发作后癫痫发作复发的风险约为40%。对老年患者首次癫痫发作后的复发风险知之甚少,由于结构性病变的发生率增加,他们可能面临更高的风险,脑病,皮质下动脉硬化性脑病或脑萎缩。
    方法:在回顾性方法中,对2004年至2017年间首次发作的304例60岁及以上患者的复发率进行了分析.分层Cox回归用于研究脑电图和神经影像学结果的影响,年龄或抗癫痫药物(ASM)的处方对癫痫复发。
    结果:1年和2年后癫痫复发率分别为24.5%和34.4%,分别。87.8%的患者开始服用抗癫痫药物,尽管在神经影像学或脑电图中没有明确的癫痫样病变,但仍占28.8%。药物治疗可显著降低复发风险(风险比=0.47)。脑电图中的癫痫样电位,神经影像学和年龄对癫痫发作复发无显著影响.年龄以及神经退行性疾病和精神病合并症的存在与ASM处方显着相关。
    结论:目前的数据表明,ASM对60岁以上患者的癫痫发作复发有很强的保护作用,即使没有诊断癫痫所需的病理神经影像学或脑电图结果。因此,ASM治疗似乎有利于降低老年患者的复发风险。癫痫发作复发和癫痫性病变之间缺乏显著关联可能与其他混杂因素有关,如脑病,皮质下动脉硬化性脑病,神经退行性疾病或脑萎缩。
    BACKGROUND: The risk of seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked epileptic seizure is reported to be approximately 40%. Little is known about the recurrence risk after a first seizure in elderly patients, who may be at higher risk due to an increased rate of structural lesions, encephalopathy, subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy or brain atrophy.
    METHODS: In a retrospective approach, the recurrence rate in 304 patients aged 60 years and above who presented with a first seizure between 2004 and 2017 was analyzed. Hierarchical Cox regression was used to investigate the impact of EEG and neuroimaging results, age or the prescription of anti-seizure medication (ASM) on seizure recurrence.
    RESULTS: Seizure recurrence rates were 24.5% and 34.4% after one and two years, respectively. Anti-seizure medication was started in 87.8% of patients, in 28.8% despite the absence of clear epileptogenic lesions on neuroimaging or epileptiform potentials in the EEG. Medical treatment significantly reduced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.47). Epileptiform potentials in the EEG, epileptogenic lesions in neuroimaging and age had no significant effect on seizure recurrence. Age and the presence of neurodegenerative and psychiatric comorbidities showed a significant association with ASM prescription.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present data show a strong protective effect of ASM on seizure recurrence in patients above the age of 60, even in the absence of pathologic neuroimaging or EEG results needed for the diagnosis of epilepsy. Treatment with ASM therefore seems beneficial for reducing the recurrence risk in elderly patients. The lack of a significant association between seizure recurrence and epileptogenic lesions might be related to other confounding factors like encephalopathy, subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy, neurodegenerative diseases or brain atrophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    没有明确的适应症可以选择最佳的抗癫痫药物来控制脑肿瘤相关的癫痫。体外研究显示左乙拉西坦和拉科酰胺对野生型成胶质细胞瘤的抗肿瘤作用。
    本研究调查了使用左乙拉西坦和/或拉科沙胺是否会影响生存率。次要目的是评估两种ASM控制癫痫发作的功效。
    在这项观察性回顾性单队列研究中,患者在GBM手术后接受放化疗方案。它们被分组如下:(1)使用左乙拉西坦,(2)使用拉科沙胺,(3)同时使用左乙拉西坦和拉科沙胺,(4)没有ASM使用。使用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制生存曲线,并进行对数秩检验以进行差异评估。评估术后癫痫发作控制的药理作用,进行负二项回归。
    该研究包括272名患者,其中174例接受了辅助放化疗治疗。未接受ASM治疗的患者的中位OS无明显延长(与其他组相比(log-rank=0.37)。拉科沙胺使用者癫痫发作复发的IRR为2.57(p=0.007)倍,MGMT启动子甲基化显示了对术后癫痫发作的保护作用(p=0.05),不考虑上述混杂因素。
    在接受放化疗治疗的GBMIDH-WT患者中,使用左乙拉西坦或拉科沙胺控制BTRE似乎不会改变生存率.与左乙拉西坦使用者相比,Lacosamide使用者表现出更高的术后癫痫发作IRR,MGMT启动子甲基化似乎是一种保护因素。
    UNASSIGNED: There are no clear indications for the best choice of anti-seizure medications to control brain tumor related epilepsy. In vitro studies have shown an antitumoral effect of Levetiracetam and Lacosamide on glioblastoma IDH-wild type.
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigates whether the use of levetiracetam and/or lacosamide impacts survival rates. The secondary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of both ASMs in controlling seizures.
    UNASSIGNED: In this observational retrospective single-cohort study, patients underwent chemoradiation protocol after GBM surgery. They were grouped as follows: (1) use of levetiracetam, (2) use of lacosamide, (3) simultaneous use of levetiracetam and lacosamide, (4) no ASM usage. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method coupled with a log-rank test for difference assesments. To evaluate the pharmacological efficacy of post-operative seizure control, a negative binomial regression was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 272 patients, 174 of which underwent adjuvant chemoradiation treatment. Patients without ASM therapy had a non-significant longer median OS (compared to the other groups (log-rank = 0.37). The IRR of seizure relapse was 2.57 (p = 0.007) times higher in lacosamide users, and MGMT promoter methylation demonstrated a protective effect against postoperative seizure onset (p = 0.05), regardless of the aforementioned confounding factors.
    UNASSIGNED: In patients diagnosed with GBM IDH-WT undergoing chemoradiation therapy, the use of levetiracetam or lacosamide for controlling BTRE does not seem to modify survival. Lacosamide users exhibited a higher IRR of postoperative seizures compared to levetiracetam users, and MGMT promoter methylation appears to be a protective factor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在这个案例研究中,一名患有唐氏综合征(DS)的16岁男性患者尽管接受了抗癫痫药物治疗和并发甲状腺功能减退症治疗,但仍面临持续性夜间癫痫发作.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA),唐氏综合症患者常见的问题,被发现是癫痫发作的诱因。实施持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗以及药物调整导致癫痫发作频率显着降低,强调在复杂疾病患者中采取全面的癫痫发作管理方法的重要性。
    In this case study, a 16-year-old male with Down syndrome (DS) faced persistent nocturnal seizures despite anti-seizure medications and treatment for concurrent hypothyroidism. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a common issue in patients with Down syndrome, was revealed as a trigger of the seizures. The implementation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy along with medication adjustments led to a significant decrease in seizure frequency, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive approach to seizure management in patients with complex medical conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号