Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder with a complex etiology and an unclear pathogenesis. In order to standardize the management of adverse effects caused by anti-seizure medications (ASMs), the Youth Committee of the Chinese Association Against Epilepsy (CAAE), in collaboration with the CAAE Precision Medicines and Adverse Effect Monitoring Committee, has developed a guideline: guidelines for the management of adverse effects of anti-seizure medications (2023). This guideline addresses 13 clinical questions related to the management of adverse effects of ASMs in the nervous system, cardiovascular system, and fetus. Its primary objective is to provide guidance to medical professionals specializing in pediatric neurology, neurology, and neurosurgery in China, and to facilitate their clinical practice.
癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病，病因复杂，发病机制尚未明确。为规范抗癫痫发作药物（anti-seizure medication, ASM）不良反应的管理，中国抗癫痫协会青年委员会联合中国抗癫痫协会精准医学与药物不良反应监测专业委员会组织制定了“抗癫痫发作药物不良反应管理指南（2023）”，对于ASM在神经精神系统、心血管系统及胎儿方面的不良反应管理，解答了13个临床问题，以期指导我国各医疗机构的癫痫专科、儿童神经科、神经内科、神经外科医务工作者的临床实践。.

BACKGROUND: The clinical, social, and economic burden of epilepsy is undeniable. Local guidance on epilepsy management is limited and needed to address the both use of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and switching practices which influence clinical outcomes.
METHODS: An expert panel composed of practicing neurologists and epileptologists from countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) met in 2022 to discuss local challenges in the management of epilepsy and formulate recommendations for clinical practice. Published literature on the outcomes of ASM switching was reviewed along with clinical practice/gaps, international guidelines, and local treatment availabilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Improper ASM use and inappropriate brand-name-to-generic or generic-to-generic switching can contribute to worsening clinical outcomes in epilepsy. ASMs should be used for the management of epilepsy based on patient clinical profile, underlying epilepsy syndrome, and drug availability to ensure optimal and sustainable treatment. Both first-generation and newer ASMs can be considered; appropriate use is recommended from the beginning of treatment. It is critical to avoid inappropriate ASM switching to avoid breakthrough seizures. All generic ASMs should fulfill strict regulatory requirements. If needed, ASM changes should always be approved by the treating physician. ASM switching (brand-name-to-generic, generic-to-generic, generic-to-brand-name) should be avoided in epilepsy patients who have achieved control but can be considered for those uncontrolled on current medication.

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus-based recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best evidence and experience.
METHODS: The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3. The analysis of evidence was mapped to the results of each statement included in the Delphi survey.
RESULTS: Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post-acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. The detailed results and discussion of all 85 statements are outlined herein. A corresponding summary of findings and practical flowsheets are presented in a companion article.
CONCLUSIONS: This detailed analysis offers insight into the supporting evidence and the current gaps in the literature that are associated with expert consensus statements related to NORSE/FIRES. The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.

OBJECTIVE: To develop consensus-based recommendations for the management of adult and pediatric patients with NORSE/FIRES based on best available evidence and expert opinion.
METHODS: The Delphi methodology was followed. A facilitator group of 9 experts was established, who defined the scope, users and suggestions for recommendations. Following a review of the current literature, recommendation statements concerning diagnosis, treatment and research directions were generated which were then voted on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) by a panel of 48 experts in the field. Consensus that a statement was appropriate was reached if the median score was greater than or equal to 7, and inappropriate if the median score was less than or equal to 3.
RESULTS: Overall, 85 recommendation statements achieved consensus. The recommendations are divided into five sections: 1) disease characteristics, 2) diagnostic testing and sampling, 3) acute treatment, 4) treatment in the post-acute phase, and 5) research, registries and future directions in NORSE/FIRES. These are summarized in this article along with two practical clinical flowsheets: one for diagnosis and evaluation and one for acute treatment. A corresponding evidence-based analysis of all 85 recommendations alongside responses by the Delphi panel is presented in a companion article.
CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations generated by this consensus can be used as a guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with NORSE/FIRES, and for planning of future research.