Prostate cancer (PCa) is initially sensitive to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but ultimately develops resistance and progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with a poor prognosis. This study indicated that some PCa patients and mice were more sensitive to ADT and entered CRPC later, which was related to the gut microbiota, especially the enrichment of Akkermansia muciniphila (AKK). Untargeted metabolomics analysis found that serum inosine level was upregulated in the treatment-sensitive group and significantly correlated with AKK. Furthermore, we revealed that intestinal permeability and serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels increased in treatment-resistant mice. LPS stimulated the upregulation of p-NF-κB p65 and AR in tumors. Supplementing AKK metabolite inosine could alleviate intestinal barrier damage and reduce serum LPS level, ultimately inhibiting castration resistance via the LPS/NF-κB/AR axis. Finally, we constructed a predictive model for CRPC combining gut microbiota and clinical information (AUC = 0.729). This study revealed the potential mechanism of gut microbiota on CRPC and provided potential therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), upfront treatment intensification with the addition of new hormonal agents and/or docetaxel to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is recommended. However, this modality is potentially excessive in a subset of these patients. This study aimed to identify patients who may be eligible to omit upfront treatment intensification.
METHODS: Patients with mCSPC who underwent ADT were enrolled. The association between undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (<0.2 ng/ml) after ADT initiation and overall or castration-resistance-free survival was evaluated.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven out of the 242 enrolled patients had low-risk and/or low-volume cancer and were further analyzed. Of these, 45 (46.4%) patients achieved undetectable PSA. The median follow-up period after ADT initiation was 70 months. The median overall survival among patients with undetectable PSA was quite long, reaching 226 months and significantly longer than that among patients with detectable PSA [71 months, hazard ratio (HR)=0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.15-0.49, p<0.001]. Time to development of castration-resistance was also long and significantly longer in the undetectable PSA group than that in the detectable PSA group (median: 124 vs. 17 months, HR=0.20, 95% CI=0.12-0.34, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk and/or low-volume mCSPC showed long-term survival when undetectable PSA was achieved during conventional ADT. In these patients, skipping upfront treatment intensification does not seem to negatively impact survival.

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men. It is heterogeneous, as is evident from the wide spectrum of therapeutic approaches. Most patients with PC are initially responsive to androgen deprivation therapy; however, the majority of cases are either hormone-sensitive PC or castration-resistant PC. Current therapeutic protocols follow the evolution of PC, a continuously progressive process involving a combination of widespread genomic alterations. These genomic alterations are either hereditary germline mutations, such as mutations in BRCA2, or specific only to tumor cells (somatic). Tumor-specific genomic spectra include genomic structural rearrangements, canonical androgen response genes, and many other specific genes such as TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, SPOP/FOXA1, TP53/RB1/PTEN, and BRCA2. New evidence indicates the involvement of signaling pathways including PI3K, WNT/β-catenin, SRC, and IL-6/STAT, which have been shown to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition cancer stem cell-like features/stemness, and neuroendocrine differentiation in PC. Over the last decade, our understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationships has been enhanced considerably. The genetic background of PC related to canonical genetic alterations and signaling pathway activation genes has shed more insight into the molecular subtype and disease landscape, resulting in a more flexible role of individual therapies targeting diverse genotypes and phenotypes.

Fracture risk is increased in men with prostate cancer (PCa) receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT). However, routine assessment of fracture risk is often not systematically applied. We aimed to establish a comprehensive care pathway for fracture prevention in men with PCa starting ADT. Therefore, a multidisciplinary working group designed and implemented a care pathway using the \'Knowledge to Action\' framework, based on current Dutch guidelines for PCa, osteoporosis and fracture prevention, and an extensive literature review of other guidelines. The pathway was developed according to a five-step clinical approach including case finding, fracture risk assessment based on risk factors, bone mineral density test, vertebral fracture assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment, and annual follow-up. Our fracture prevention care pathway for patients with PCa at the time of ADT initiation was designed to promote a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach to facilitate the implementation of early fracture prevention measures.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been associated with adverse effects on the brain. ADT leads to altered testosterone levels that may affect brain morphology as well as cognition. Considering the reliability of cortical thickness (CT) as a marker of cognitive and brain changes, e.g., in Alzheimer\'s disease, we assessed the impacts of ADT on CT and working memory. Thirty men with non-metastatic prostate cancer receiving ADT and 32 patients not receiving ADT (controls or CON), matched in age and years of education, participated in N-back task and quality-of-life (QoL) assessments as well as brain imaging at baseline and prospectively at 6 months. Imaging data were processed with published routines to estimate CT and the results of a group by time flexible factorial analysis were evaluated at a corrected threshold. ADT and CON did not differ in N-back performance or QoL across time points. Relative to CON, patients receiving ADT showed significantly higher frontopolar cortex (FPC) CT at 6-month follow-up vs. baseline. Follow-up vs. baseline FPC CT change correlated negatively with changes in 2-back correct response rate and in testosterone levels across all participants. In mediation analysis, FPC CT change mediated the association between testosterone level change and 2-back accuracy rate change. Increases in FPC CT following 6 months of ADT may reflect early neurodegenerative changes in response to androgen deprivation. While no significant impact on working memory or QoL was observed over 6 months, further research of longer duration of treatment is warranted to unravel the full spectrum of cognitive and neural consequences of ADT in prostate cancer patients.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer (PC) has substantial negative impacts on the musculoskeletal system and body composition. Many studies have focused on the effects of ADT on areal bone mineral density (aBMD), but aBMD does not capture key determinants of bone strength and fracture risk, for example volumetric bone density (vBMD), geometry, cortical thickness and porosity, trabecular parameters and rate of remodelling. More specialist imaging techniques such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) have become available to evaluate these parameters. Although it has previously been demonstrated that bone microarchitectural deterioration occurs in men undergoing ADT, the aim of the ANTELOPE study was to examine longitudinal changes in bone microstructure alongside a range of musculoskeletal parameters and frailty, comparing men with PC receiving ADT alone or ADT plus chemotherapy for metastatic disease, with a healthy age-matched population.
UNASSIGNED: We used HR-pQCT to investigate effects of 12 months of ADT on vBMD and microstructural parameters, complemented by assessment of changes in aBMD, serum bone turnover markers, sex hormones, body composition, grip strength, physical and muscle function, frailty and fracture risk. We studied three groups: Group A - men with localised/locally advanced PC due to commence ADT; Group B - men with newly diagnosed hormone-sensitive, metastatic PC, starting ADT alongside docetaxel chemotherapy and steroids; Group C - healthy, age-matched men. The primary endpoint was change in vBMD (Group A vs Group C) at the distal radius.
UNASSIGNED: Ninety-nine participants underwent baseline study assessments (Group A: n = 38, Group B: n = 30 and Group C: n = 31). Seventy-five participants completed all study assessments (Group A (29), Group B (18), Group C (28). At baseline, there were no significant differences between Groups A and C in any of the BMD or bone microstructure outcomes of interest. After 12 months of ADT treatment, there was a significantly greater decrease in vBMD (p < 0.001) in Group A (mean 12-month change = -13.7 mg HA/cm3, -4.1 %) compared to Group C (mean 12-month change = -1.3 mg HA/cm3, -0.4 %), demonstrating achievement of primary outcome. Similar effects were observed when comparing the change in vBMD between Group B (mean 12-month change = -13.5 mg HA/cm3, -4.3 %) and Group C. These changes were mirrored in aBMD. ADT resulted in microstructural deterioration, a reduction in estimated bone strength and an increase in bone turnover. There was evidence of increase in total fat mass and trunkal fat mass in ADT-treated patients, with marked loss in upper limb mass, along with BMI gain. Frailty increased and physical performance and strength deteriorated in both ADT groups, relative to the healthy control group.
UNASSIGNED: The study showed that ADT has profound effects on vBMD, aBMD, bone microstructure and strength and body composition, and important impacts on frailty and physical performance. Whilst DXA remains a valuable tool (changes in aBMD are of the same magnitude as those observed for vBMD), HR-pQCT should be considered for assessing the effects of anti-androgens and other newer PC therapies on bone, as well as potential mitigation by bone-targeted agents.

Continued exploration of the androgen receptor (AR) is crucial, as it plays pivotal roles in diverse diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa), serving as a significant therapeutic focus. Therefore, the Department of Urology Dresden hosted an international meeting for scientists and clinical oncologists to discuss the newest advances in AR research. The 2nd International Androgen Receptor Symposium was held in Dresden, Saxony, Germany, from 26-27.04.2024, organised by Dr. Holger H.H. Erb. Following the format of the first meeting, more than 35 scientists from 8 countries attended the event to discuss recent developments, research challenges, and identification of venues in AR research. An important new feature was the involvement of PhD students and young investigators, acknowledging the high scientific quality of their work. The symposium included three covers: new advances from clinical research, basic and translational research, and novel strategies to target AR. Moreover, based on its increasing clinical relevance, a PSMA theranostic mini-symposium was added at the end of the AR symposium to allow the audience to discuss the newest advances in PSMA theranostic. This report focuses on the highlights and discussions of the meeting.

Antiandrogens have been used for the treatment of prostate cancer as a single agent or in combination with hormone deprivation therapy. New generation antiandrogens act like androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs). Their binding complex blocks the pathways of cellular proliferation and differentiation of the prostate. Enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide are the new ARIs that demonstrated acceptable tolerability and toxicity, both active in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). There is no evidence of superiority of one drug over the other, therefore the therapeutic choice depends on the safety profile in relation to the individual patient, their comorbidities and clinical condition. ARIs have also shown promising results in association with new drugs that are active on patients with metastatic CRPC carrying the mutated breast cancer gene (BRCA). Before undergoing new antiandrogenic therapies, patients should be evaluated for cardiological and metabolic risk and possible drug interactions.

Treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) have led to improved survival in advanced prostate cancer. However, ADT is linked to significant cardiovascular toxicity, and ARPi also negatively impacts cardiovascular health. Together with a higher prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors reported among prostate cancer survivors at diagnosis, there is a pressing need to prioritise and optimise cardiovascular health in this population. Firstly, While no dedicated cardiovascular toxicity risk calculators are available, other tools such as SCORE2 can be used for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment. Next, selected patients on combination therapy may benefit from de-escalation of ADT to minimise its toxicities while maintaining cancer control. These patients can be characterised by an exceptional PSA response to hormonal treatment, favourable disease characteristics and competing comorbidities that warrant a less aggressive treatment regime. In addition, emerging molecular and genomic biomarkers hold the potential to identify patients who are suited for a de-escalated treatment approach either with ADT or with ARPi. One such biomarker is AR-V7 splice variant that predicts resistance to ARPi. Lastly, optimization of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for patients through a coherent framework (ABCDE) and exercise therapy is equally important. This article aims to comprehensively review the cardiovascular impact of hormonal manipulation in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, propose overarching strategies to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity associated with hormonal treatment, and, most importantly, raise awareness about the detrimental cardiovascular effects inherent in our current management strategies involving hormonal agents.