UNASSIGNED: An estimated 57.4 million people live with dementia worldwide, with the social burden of the disease steadily growing. Despite the approval of lecanemab and ongoing trials, there is still a lack of effective and safe treatments for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which affect 99% of patients. Agitation is one of the most disabling BPSD, with a cross-sectional prevalence of ≥50% in nursing homes, and refers to help-seeking behavior in response to various sources of discomfort, among which pain is a crucial component.
UNASSIGNED: This pilot phase of the BRAINAID (NCT04321889) trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of the patented nanotechnological device NanoBEO in older (≥65 years) people with severe dementia. This randomized placebo-controlled trial, with quadruple masking that involved all operators and participants, followed the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements. A total of 29 patients completed the trial. The patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the NanoBEO or placebo group, and the corresponding product was applied on both arms once daily for 4 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was efficacy against agitation. The secondary endpoints were efficacy against agitation at follow-up and efficacy against pain. Any adverse events were reported, and biochemical analyses were performed.
UNASSIGNED: The NanoBEO intervention reduced the frequency (28%) and level of disruptiveness of agitated behaviors. The effect on frequency was statistically significant after 2 weeks of treatment. The efficacy of NanoBEO on agitated behaviors lasted for the entire 4-week treatment period. No additional psychotropic drugs were prescribed throughout the study duration. The results after 1 week of treatment demonstrated that NanoBEO had statistically significant analgesic efficacy (45.46% improvement in pain intensity). The treatment was well tolerated.
UNASSIGNED: This trial investigated the efficacy of NanoBEO therapy in managing agitation and pain in dementia. No need for rescue medications was recorded, strengthening the efficacy of NanoBEO in prolonged therapy for advanced-stage dementia and the usefulness of the intervention in the deprescription of potentially harmful drugs. This study provided a robust rationale for the application of NanoBEO in a subsequent large-scale pivotal trial to allow clinical translation of the product. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04321889.

The management of schizophrenia necessitates a comprehensive treatment paradigm that considers individual patient nuances and the efficacy of lurasidone in addressing schizophrenia symptoms, particularly at elevated dosages. Numerous randomized trials have affirmed the efficacy of lurasidone across various dimensions of schizophrenia, demonstrating marked enhancements in positive, negative and cognitive symptoms compared to a placebo. In addition, lurasidone exhibits potential in ameliorating agitation amongst acutely ill patients, showcasing greater efficacy at higher doses. However, despite the favourable outcomes observed with higher lurasidone doses, routine clinical practice often opts for lower doses, potentially limiting its maximal therapeutic impact. Furthermore, lurasidone also shows efficacy in reducing post-psychotic depression in dual psychosis. Moreover, practical insights into lurasidone usage encompass swift dose escalation within a 1-5-day span and recommended combination strategies with other medications such as benzodiazepines for insomnia or agitation, beta-blockers for akathisia, and antihistamines or antimuscarinic drugs for patients transitioning rapidly from antipsychotics with substantial antihistamine and/or anticholinergic effects. Finally, a series of clinical cases is presented, highlighting benefits of lurasidone in terms of cognitive function, functional recovery and other therapeutic aspects for the management of schizophrenia.

UNASSIGNED: The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) quantifies the frequency of agitation behaviors in elderly persons. This post hoc analysis of data from the brexpiprazole clinical program aimed to determine a meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) threshold for CMAI Total score among patients with agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease.
UNASSIGNED: Data were included from three 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trials of brexpiprazole for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01862640, NCT01922258, NCT03548584). Change in CMAI Total score (range 29-203; higher scores indicate higher frequency of agitation behaviors) from baseline to Week 12 was the primary endpoint in each trial. MWPC thresholds were estimated from anchor-based mean change analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scales, both as related to agitation, were used as anchors. Empirical cumulative distribution functions (eCDFs) and probability density functions (PDFs) were plotted as supportive evidence. Distribution-based methods were also employed.
UNASSIGNED: Data from 898 patients were analyzed (mean age, 73.7 years; mean baseline CMAI Total score, 73.8). The mean CMAI Total score change corresponding to a difference of small improvement vs. stable (CGI-S one-point decrease vs. no change), or minimally improved vs. no change (CGI-I rating of 3 vs. 4), ranged from -10.6 to -13.5 points. The mean CMAI Total score change corresponding to a difference of moderate improvement vs. stable (CGI-S two-point decrease vs. no change), or much improved vs. no change (CGI-I rating of 2 vs. 4), ranged from -20.2 to -25.7 points. ROC curve analyses generally produced smaller estimates of meaningful change. eCDFs and PDFs showed good distribution and separation of CMAI Total score change between CGI-S/CGI-I categories. In distribution-based analyses, the minimal detectable change for CMAI Total score (10.5-11.8 points) was generally lower than anchor-suggested thresholds.
UNASSIGNED: Triangulation of evidence from anchor- and distribution-based analyses supports an MWPC threshold for CMAI Total score of -20 points, with a threshold range of -15 to -25 points, in patients with agitation associated with dementia due to Alzheimer\'s disease.

UNASSIGNED: There is no consensus on the optimal antipsychotic for acute agitation. Whereas haloperidol is frequently used and has proven efficacy, second generation antipsychotics show similar efficacy and improved safety and tolerability. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of short-acting intramuscular (IM) haloperidol versus other IM antipsychotics for acute agitation in adults admitted to an inpatient psychiatry unit.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective medical record review of patients who received 1 or more doses of a short-acting IM antipsychotic, including chlorpromazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, or ziprasidone. The primary endpoint was the need for subsequent IM antipsychotic(s) or physical restraint within 2 hours of the initial IM antipsychotic. Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes at 24 hours and adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred six patients were included. Four patients in the haloperidol group and 0 patients in the other antipsychotic group received an additional IM antipsychotic or required physical restraints within 2 hours (5.3% versus 0%, p = .319). More patients in the other antipsychotic group required an additional dose of IM antipsychotic within 24 hours compared with the haloperidol group (p = .0096). More adverse events were seen in patients who received haloperidol.
UNASSIGNED: Haloperidol was used more frequently than other short-acting IM antipsychotics. Whereas the effectiveness at 2 hours was not significantly different between groups, patients who received haloperidol were more likely to experience adverse events and were more often subjected to polypharmacy with benzodiazepines and/or diphenhydramine. This study further supports the use of olanzapine and ziprasidone for acute agitation in patients hospitalized in inpatient psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: Severe psychomotor agitation and aggression often require immediate pharmacological intervention, but clear evidence-based recommendations for choosing among the multiple options are lacking. To address this gap, we plan a systematic review and individual-participant-data network meta-analysis to investigate their comparative effectiveness in real-world emergency settings with increased precision.
METHODS: We will include randomized controlled trials investigating intramuscular or intravenous pharmacological interventions, as monotherapy or in combination, in adults with severe psychomotor agitation irrespective of the underlying diagnosis and requiring rapid tranquilization in general or psychiatric emergency settings. We will exclude studies before 2002, those focusing on specific reasons for agitation and placebo-controlled trials to avoid concerns related to the transitivity assumption and potential selection biases. We will search for eligible studies in BIOSIS, CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE via Ovid, PubMed, ProQuest, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ICTRP. Individual-participant data will be requested from the study authors and harmonized into a uniform format, and aggregated data will also be extracted from the studies. At least two independent reviewers will conduct the study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment using RoB 2, and applicability evaluation using the RITES tool. The primary outcome will be the number of patients achieving adequate sedation within 30 min after treatment, with secondary outcomes including the need for additional interventions and adverse events, using odds ratios as the effect size. If enough individual-participant data will be collected, we will synthesize them in a network meta-regression model within a Bayesian framework, incorporating study- and participant-level characteristics to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. In cases where individual-participant data are unavailable, potential data availability bias will be explored, and models allowing for the inclusion of studies reporting only aggregated data will be considered. We will assess the confidence in the evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach.
CONCLUSIONS: This individual-participant-data network meta-analysis aims to provide a fine-tuned synthesis of the evidence on the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for severe psychomotor agitation in real-world emergency settings. The findings from this study can greatly be provided clearer evidence-based guidance on the most effective treatments.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023402365.

UNASSIGNED: This review explores delirium in critically ill patients in the inpatient setting, focusing on its prevention and management. It evaluates the efficacy of both current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating the prevention and management of delirium resulting in a final sample of 26 articles for analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 26 articles analyzed for this review (N = 8,831 participants) of controlled trials, 16 studies examined the prevention of delirium, 9 explored the treatment of delirium, and 1 investigated both prevention and treatment of delirium.
UNASSIGNED: Among the reviewed studies, there is evidence that non-pharmacologic methods are effective in the prevention of delirium. Evidence regarding pharmacological interventions for delirium prevention is varied and inconclusive, with some indication that atypical antipsychotics like aripiprazole and quetiapine may reduce the incidence of delirium. Regarding the treatment of delirium, there is limited evidence supporting the use of pharmacological agents. Additional double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of pharmacologic agents for diverse hospitalized populations.

UNASSIGNED: Agitation is a common symptom in patients with Alzheimer\'s dementia. But agitation can be a heterogeneous symptom, encompassing a diverse array of behaviors exhibited by patients. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale that is used to systematically assess the frequency and severity of agitation in older adults as rated by a primary caregiver. The CMAI was originally designed for use by professional care givers in institutional care settings. Alzheimer\'s dementia, however, is associated with a significant burden on family members, who provide the majority of care, and other informal care partners.
UNASSIGNED: Our qualitative study aimed to assess the accuracy and applicability of the CMAI according to the needs and perceptions of non-professional care partners. Specifically, we wanted to determine if the behaviors included in the instrument reflect: (a) the care partner\'s experience with agitation in Alzheimer\'s dementia patients, (b) how the behaviors and their frequency are related to the perception of agitation severity, and (c) what changes in agitation behaviors are meaningful to care partners. We interviewed 30 care partners for patients with Alzheimer\'s dementia in the United States.
UNASSIGNED: The care partners confirmed all behaviors listed in the CMAI as relevant. The behaviors reflect a spectrum of severity, with aggressive behaviors considered more severe than non-aggressive behaviors and physical behaviors generally considered more severe than verbal behaviors. Any reduction or increase in the frequency of a behavior was meaningful to care partners. Generally, a change from physical to verbal behaviors and aggressive to non-aggressive was considered a meaningful improvement while a change from verbal to physical and non-aggressive to aggressive was considered a meaningful worsening.
UNASSIGNED: The CMAI appropriately captures relevant behaviors of agitation in Alzheimer\'s dementia and provides insight into the relative improvement or worsening of agitation symptoms.

暂无摘要。

Gastric malabsorptive conditions may prevent patients from deriving benefit from orally administered medications intended for enteric absorption. While malabsorption is an increasingly common issue, current data on alternative oral options for agitation in these patients are very sparse. Sublingual (SL) asenapine is absorbed transmucosally, bypassing gut absorption, making it a viable consideration. We report on three patients, one with short bowel syndrome, one with viral gastritis, and one with aortic dissection who were trialed on SL asenapine for agitation after failing alternative antipsychotics. Two of these patients had an extensive history of psychiatric admissions for bipolar disorder and substance-induced psychosis. All three patients had significant reductions in agitation within 1-5 days, with no reported adverse effects. However, benefit of SL asenapine was hindered in two of these patients as they began inappropriately swallowing the medication, reducing bioavailability to nil. Clinicians should consider the use of SL asenapine for medically complex agitated patients where gastric absorption is questionable. There is an urgent need for guidelines on this matter, as well as more, alternative dosage forms for various medications that may help with agitation in this population.

UNASSIGNED: Studies on agitation in internal medicine departments are scarce, especially regarding how doctors and nurses act in these situations. The objective of this study was to clarify how agitation is dealt with in these departments.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational study was performed in the internal medicine departments of four Portuguese hospitals. The researchers at each hospital contacted the nursing team that identifies patients who were agitated in the previous shifts. The researcher reviewed these patients\' files, recording the research protocol\'s parameters.
UNASSIGNED: During the study period, 331 patients were observed; 177 (54%) were female, and the median age was 80 years (19-99). Episodes of agitation occurred in 69 patients (21%); of them, 44 (64%) were female, and the median age was 84 years (31-98). In the first episode of agitation, the doctor on duty was called in 49 times (71%). These doctors prescribed a new medication for the crisis in 30 cases (43%). After the crisis, the assistant doctor recorded the episode in the patient file in 41 cases (59%). According to the medical notes, after the acute phase, in only 21 patients (30%), there was an attempt to clarify the cause of agitation. The prescription after the crisis was regular medication in 32 cases (46%), rescue medication in 27 (39%), and physical restraint in 9 (13%), isolated or in various combinations.
UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that there is room to improve how agitated patients are managed in internal medicine departments.