Agitation

搅动
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述探讨了住院危重患者的谵妄,注重预防和管理。它评估了当前药物和非药物干预措施的疗效,旨在提供全面的概述。
    进行了系统的文献检索,以确定调查谵妄预防和管理的相关研究,最终获得26篇文章的样本进行分析。
    在本对照试验综述分析的26篇文章中(N=8,831名参与者),16项研究检查了谵妄的预防,9探讨谵妄的治疗方法,1调查了谵妄的预防和治疗。
    在综述的研究中,有证据表明,非药物方法可有效预防谵妄。关于预防谵妄的药物干预措施的证据多种多样,尚无定论,有迹象表明,阿立哌唑和喹硫平等非典型抗精神病药物可能会降低谵妄的发生率。关于谵妄的治疗,支持使用药物的证据有限.额外的双盲,随机化,需要安慰剂对照的临床试验来研究药物对不同住院人群的疗效.
    UNASSIGNED: This review explores delirium in critically ill patients in the inpatient setting, focusing on its prevention and management. It evaluates the efficacy of both current pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies investigating the prevention and management of delirium resulting in a final sample of 26 articles for analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 26 articles analyzed for this review (N = 8,831 participants) of controlled trials, 16 studies examined the prevention of delirium, 9 explored the treatment of delirium, and 1 investigated both prevention and treatment of delirium.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the reviewed studies, there is evidence that non-pharmacologic methods are effective in the prevention of delirium. Evidence regarding pharmacological interventions for delirium prevention is varied and inconclusive, with some indication that atypical antipsychotics like aripiprazole and quetiapine may reduce the incidence of delirium. Regarding the treatment of delirium, there is limited evidence supporting the use of pharmacological agents. Additional double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of pharmacologic agents for diverse hospitalized populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重症监护病房的患者在机械通气(MV)期间会经历较高的症状负担。药物症状管理与副作用和发病率增加有关。基于音乐的干预(MBI)与MV成人的焦虑和危重病成人的疼痛减少有关。然而,它们用于治疗其他繁重症状的用途尚未得到评估。此范围审查的目的是绘制使用预先录制的音乐收听MBI进行MV成人症状管理的证据状态。方法:在四个电子数据库(PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL,andWebofScience)forexperimentaldesignedstudiesthatmeasuredtheefficiencyofMBIsforthemanagementofphysicalandpsychologicalsymptomsincluding焦虑症,镇静/激动,呼吸困难,苦恼,谵妄,睡眠,压力,恐惧,孤独,或危重病时的抑郁症,1998年1月1日至2023年4月18日之间的MV成人。结果:共纳入643篇摘要和29项临床试验。总的来说,偏见的风险,使用证据项目工具进行评估,是温和的。MBI大多是通过使用调查人员或有限选择中选择的音乐与耳机一起提供的。MBIs与疼痛减轻有关,激动,呼吸困难,痛苦和焦虑,提高了MV和镇静断奶的耐受性。谵妄的结果好坏参半。没有研究探索睡眠障碍,恐惧,或者孤独.结论:使用MBI改善了MV期间危重成人的症状体验。未来的研究采用不受限制的患者偏好的音乐选择和探索睡眠质量的结果,心理困扰,在这种高度症状的患者群体中需要谵妄。
    Background: Patients in intensive care units experience high symptom burden during mechanical ventilation (MV). Pharmacologic symptom management is associated with side effects and increased morbidity. Music-based interventions (MBIs) have been associated with reductions in both anxiety in MV adults and pain for critically ill adults, yet their use for the management of other burdensome symptoms has not been evaluated. The purpose of this scoping review is to map the state of evidence for the use of prerecorded music listening MBIs for symptom management in MV adults. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted across four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science) for experimental designed studies that measured the efficacy of MBIs for the management of physical and psychological symptoms including anxiety, sedation/agitation, dyspnea, distress, delirium, sleep, stress, fear, loneliness, or depression in critically ill, MV adults between January 1, 1998, and April 18, 2023. Results: A total of 643 abstracts and 29 clinical trials were included. Overall, the risk of bias, assessed using the Evidence Project tool, was moderate. MBIs were mostly delivered with headphones using music selected either by investigators or from a limited selection. MBIs were associated with reduced pain, agitation, dyspnea, distress and anxiety, and improved tolerance of MV and sedative weaning. Outcomes of delirium were mixed. No studies explored sleep disturbances, fear, or loneliness. Conclusions: Use of MBIs improved symptom experience for critically ill adults during MV. Future studies employing unrestricted patient-preferred music selections and exploring outcomes of sleep quality, psychological distress, and delirium are needed in this highly symptomatic patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种持续的神经发育障碍,通常与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和行为相关疾病同时发生。虽然行为疗法是治疗ASD核心症状的一线选择,有时需要药物治疗来治疗急性问题,如激动和攻击性行为。最近的指南建议使用抗精神病药减少ASD患者的精神运动躁动。然而,因为患有ASD的儿童通常是耐药的,替代疗法通常是合理的。文献报道表明,静脉注射丙戊酸盐(IV-VPA)可有效减少精神病患者的躁动,与常规治疗相比,不良事件发生频率较低。然而,由于相关发现有时不一致,在临床精神病学的背景下,IV-VPA尚未被批准。我们旨在提高对儿科患者急诊精神病治疗的IV-VPA治疗选择的认识。方法:我们报告了一个患有复杂神经发育疾病的11岁男孩的案例,该男孩经历了精神病发作并具有严重的攻击性和破坏性行为,并成功接受了IV-VPA治疗。此外,我们提供了有关该主题的最新文献综述。结论:在我们的案例中,一线治疗被证明是无效的。相反,IV-VPA导致安全和迅速的临床成功,这与其他报告一致。根据我们的文献综述,IV-VPA可以非常有效,并降低在急诊精神病学中使用高剂量标准药物经常发生的不良事件的风险。
    Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a persistent neurodevelopmental disorder frequently co-occurring with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and behavior-related disorders. While behavioral therapy is the first-line option to manage the core symptoms of ASD, pharmacological therapy is sometimes needed to treat acute problems, such as agitation and aggressive behaviors. Recent guidelines recommend the use of neuroleptics to reduce psychomotor agitation in patients with ASD. However, as children with ASD are often drug-resistant, alternative treatments are often justified. Reports from the literature have indicated that intravenous valproate (IV-VPA) can be effective in reducing agitation in psychiatric patients, with a lower frequency of adverse events compared to conventional treatments. However, as the related findings are occasionally inconsistent, IV-VPA is not yet an approved option in the context of clinical psychiatry. We aim to improve knowledge of the IV-VPA treatment option for emergency psychiatric treatment in pediatric patients. Methods: We report the case of an 11-year-old boy suffering from a complex neurodevelopmental condition who experienced a psychotic episode with severe aggressive and disruptive behaviors and was successfully treated with IV-VPA. Furthermore, we provide an updated literature review on this topic. Conclusion: In our case, first-line therapies proved to be ineffective. To the contrary, IV-VPA led to safe and prompt clinical success, which is in line with other reports. Based on our literature review, IV-VPA can be highly effective and reduces the risk of adverse events that frequently occur with the use of high-dose standard medications in emergency psychiatry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:40-60%的痴呆患者(PLWD)出现激动和/或攻击症状。需要了解检测PLWD中的激动和/或侵略的最佳方法。我们旨在确定在PLWD背景下根据参考标准进行验证的激动和/或侵略工具。
    方法:我们的研究在PROSPERO注册(CRD42020156708)。我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,和PsycINFO截至2024年4月22日。没有语言或日期限制。如果他们使用任何工具或问卷来检测与PLWD参考标准相比的激动或侵略,或任何在人群中比较两种或多种激动和/或侵略工具的研究。所有筛选和数据提取一式两份进行。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS-2)工具评估研究质量。数据提取由两个独立的作者重复完成。我们提取了人口统计信息,躁动和/或侵略的普遍性,和诊断准确性措施。我们还报道了比较两种或多种激动和/或侵略工具之间相关性的研究。
    结果:6961篇文章在数据库中进行了筛选。包括六篇报告与参考标准相比的诊断准确性测量的文章和30篇报告工具之间相关性测量的文章。西班牙NPI的激动域对西班牙CAMDEX的激动小节表现出最高的敏感性(100%)。发现了常用躁动量表诊断准确性的单一研究证据(BEHAVE-AD,NPI和CMAI)。
    结论:西班牙NPI的激动领域,NBRS,PAS表现出很高的敏感性,并可能是合理的临床实施。然而,这一发现的局限性在于,尽管进行了广泛的搜索,很少有具有诊断准确性测量的研究被确定。最终,需要更多的研究来了解PLWD中躁动和/或攻击检测工具的诊断准确性.
    OBJECTIVE: 40-60% of persons living with dementia (PLWD) experience agitation and/or aggression symptoms. There is a need to understand the best method to detect agitation and/or aggression in PLWD. We aimed to identify agitation and/or aggression tools that are validated against a reference standard within the context of PLWD.
    METHODS: Our study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020156708). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO up to April 22, 2024. There were no language or date restrictions. Studies were included if they used any tools or questionnaires for detecting either agitation or aggression compared to a reference standard among PLWD, or any studies that compared two or more agitation and/or aggression tools in the population. All screening and data extraction were done in duplicates. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Data extraction was completed in duplicates by two independent authors. We extracted demographic information, prevalence of agitation and/or aggression, and diagnostic accuracy measures. We also reported studies comparing the correlation between two or more agitation and/or aggression tools.
    RESULTS: 6961 articles were screened across databases. Six articles reporting diagnostic accuracy measures compared to a reference standard and 30 articles reporting correlation measurements between tools were included. The agitation domain of the Spanish NPI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (100%) against the agitation subsection of the Spanish CAMDEX. Single-study evidence was found for the diagnostic accuracy of commonly used agitation scales (BEHAVE-AD, NPI and CMAI).
    CONCLUSIONS: The agitation domain of the Spanish NPI, the NBRS, and the PAS demonstrated high sensitivities, and may be reasonable for clinical implementation. However, a limitation to this finding is that despite an extensive search, few studies with diagnostic accuracy measurements were identified. Ultimately, more research is needed to understand the diagnostic accuracy of agitation and/or aggression detection tools among PLWD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:躁动/谵妄常见于麻醉后的儿童,适当剂量的右美托咪定可以预防这种并发症。本研究旨在探讨不同剂量右美托咪定(DEX)对麻醉患儿躁动/谵妄等并发症的影响。为DEX的剂量建议提供临床证据。
    方法:本研究基于系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目进行。在Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的搜索,PubMed,WebofScience,和EMBASE。两名独立研究人员进行了文献筛选,数据提取,并评估了方法学质量。使用R和STATA16.0进行数据分析。
    结果:在最终分析中,纳入20项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及2521名儿童。结果表明,与生理盐水相比,1µg/kg,1.5微克/千克,和2µg/kg鼻内DEX显着降低了最有效剂量为2µg/kg(SUCRA=0.91)的儿童麻醉后苏醒期躁动的发生率。与生理盐水相比,1µg/kg,1.5微克/千克,和2µg/kg鼻内DEX减少了患者对术后镇痛的需要,最有效剂量为1.5µg/kg(SUCRA=0.78)。然而,1µg/kgDEX在降低小儿麻醉出现谵妄(PAED)量表评分方面表现最好(SUCRA=0.88)。
    结论:与生理盐水相比,鼻内给药2µg/kgDEX和1.5µg/kgDEX是降低全身麻醉儿童躁动发生率和术后疼痛缓解需要的最佳剂量。鉴于有效性和安全性,鼻内使用1µg/kgDEX似乎是麻醉儿童最有效的剂量。
    BACKGROUND: Agitation/delirium is commonly seen in children after anesthesia, and a proper dose of dexmedetomidine can prevent this complication. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of Dexmedetomidine (DEX) on agitation/delirium and other complications in anesthetized children, providing clinical evidence for dose recommendations of DEX.
    METHODS: This study was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematic search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Two independent researchers performed literature screening, data extraction, and assessed the methodological quality. Data analysis was conducted using R and STATA 16.0.
    RESULTS: In the final analysis, 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2521 children were included. The results showed that in comparison to normal saline, 1 µg/kg, 1.5 µg/kg, and 2 µg/kg intranasal DEX significantly reduced the incidence of post-anesthetic emergence agitation in children with the most effective dose being 2 µg/kg (SUCRA = 0.91). Compared with normal saline, 1 µg/kg, 1.5 µg/kg, and 2 µg/kg intranasal DEX reduced patient\'s need for postoperative analgesia, with the most effective dose being 1.5 µg/kg (SUCRA = 0.78). However, 1 µg/kg DEX performed the best in reducing Pediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) Scale score (SUCRA = 0.88).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with normal saline, intranasal administration of 2 µg/kg DEX and 1.5 µg/kg DEX are the optimal doses to reduce the incidence of agitation and the need for postoperative pain relief in children under general anesthesia. Given effectiveness and safety, intranasal use of 1 µg/kg DEX appears to be the most effective dosage for anesthetized children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:在生命的尽头,谵妄和疼痛的患病率很高。目前的治疗方法并不令人满意。右美托咪定可用于控制谵妄和疼痛,但在重症监护环境之外未获批准。我们的目标是评估文献中评估右美托咪定在疼痛和谵妄控制中的有效性及其在重症监护病房以外的姑息治疗患者中的安全性的现有证据。该系统评价在PROSPERO进行了前瞻性注册,并包括偏见风险评估。方法:研究PubMed和SCOPUS直到2023年发表的文献。实验性的,队列,横截面,病例对照研究,如果评估右美托咪定在住院姑息治疗成人患者谵妄和/或疼痛管理中的应用,则纳入病例系列/报告.如果研究是在重症监护病房进行的,则将其排除在外。结果:在最初的529条记录中,14人被包括在内。虽然只有两项研究是随机试验,大多数是小的,只有一个有低风险的偏倚.在大多数病例报告和两项回顾性队列研究中,右美托咪定似乎是这些症状的更好选择,尽管在随机试验中差异不显著.讨论:右美托咪定似乎是难治性疼痛和谵妄的一种有希望的选择,可能有助于减少阿片类药物的使用以控制疼痛。这是右美托咪定在姑息治疗中的首次系统评价。质量证据有限,但是右美托咪定的临床特性证明了在姑息治疗中进行对照试验的合理性.
    Introduction: At the end of life, the prevalence of delirium and pain is high. Current therapy is not satisfactory. Dexmedetomidine could be useful in the control of delirium and pain but is not approved outside of intensive care setting. Our objectives are to evaluate existing evidence in the literature that assessed the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in pain and delirium control and its safety in palliative care patients outside intensive care units. This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and included a risk of bias assessment. Methods: PubMed and SCOPUS were examined for literature published until 2023. Experimental, cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies, and case series/reports were included if they evaluate the use of dexmedetomidine in delirium and/or pain management in hospitalized palliative care adult patients. Studies were excluded if they were carried out in intensive care units. Results: Of the initial 529 records, 14 were included. Although only two studies were randomized trials, most were small and only one had low risk of bias. In most case reports and in the two retrospective cohort studies, dexmedetomidine appears to be a better option for these symptoms, although differences were not significant in the randomized trials. Discussion: Dexmedetomidine seems to be a promising option for refractory pain and delirium and may contribute to a reduction in opioid administration to control pain. This is the first systematic review of dexmedetomidine in palliative care. Quality evidence is limited, but clinical properties of dexmedetomidine justify the conduction of controlled trials in palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    管理躁动和其他具有挑战性的行为是一项重大的痴呆症护理挑战。优先考虑的是找到有效的非药物干预措施,因为药物治疗可能具有明显的副作用。这篇综述评估了结构化身体活动对痴呆症躁动的有效性。
    我们的快速审查搜索了四个电子数据库,科克伦中部,MEDLINE,CINAHL和Embase,使用结构化的身体活动计划对痴呆症患者进行干预研究,并研究了这种活动对挑战行为的影响。使用CASP标准评估研究质量,并对数据进行叙述合成。
    我们在这篇综述中纳入了13项研究(4项被评为高质量),共有1546名参与者。根据运动类型分析结果,干预的频率和强度。运动可有效减少躁动,对运动依从性较高的研究显示出对躁动和挑战行为的积极影响。
    体力活动可以有效减少老年痴呆症患者的躁动。需要进一步的研究来澄清最有益的干预类型。需要制定策略,使身体活动更容易被痴呆症患者接受和获得。
    UNASSIGNED: Managing agitation and other behaviours that challenge is a significant dementia care challenge. The priority is to find effective non-pharmacological interventions as drug treatments can have significant side effects. This review evaluates the effectiveness of structured physical activity on agitation in dementia.
    UNASSIGNED: Our rapid review searched four electronic databases, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase, for interventional studies using a structured physical activity programme in people with dementia and studied the effect of this activity on behaviours that challenge. Study quality was assessed using CASP criteria and data was narratively synthesised.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 13 studies in this review (four rated as high quality), involving a total of 1546 participants. Results were analysed according to exercise type, frequency and intensity of the intervention. Exercise is effective in reducing agitation and studies with higher adherence to exercise demonstrated more positive effects on agitation and behaviours that challenge.
    UNASSIGNED: Physical activity can be effective in reducing agitation in older adults with dementia. Further research is needed to clarify the type of intervention that is most beneficial. Strategies to make physical activity more acceptable and available to people with dementia need to be established.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    虽然不常见,与普通人群相比,精神分裂症患者遭受侵略和暴力的风险更大。氯氮平是治疗精神分裂症患者持续性躁动和攻击性的“金标准”药物治疗,并为此目的一直被指南和评论推荐。尽管氯氮平基于其优异的疗效被用于治疗耐药性精神分裂症,研究表明,氯氮平可能具有改善攻击性和敌意的特定特性,这与其抗精神病作用不同。2023年6月3日,使用美国国家医学图书馆的PubMed资源进行了文献综述,以确定针对氯氮平治疗侵略的文章。暴力,精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍患者的敌意。大部分证据,包括随机对照试验,支持使用氯氮平作为精神分裂症患者持续攻击行为的维持治疗,并支持其抗攻击性作用可能独立于其抗精神病药特性(例如-治疗幻觉和妄想)。未来的随机对照研究评估氯氮平和以攻击性为主要结果的氯氮平血清水平将是有益的。
    Although uncommon, the risk of aggression and violence is greater in people with schizophrenia than in the general population. Clozapine is the \"gold standard\" pharmacologic treatment for the management of persistent agitation and aggression in people with schizophrenia and is consistently recommended by guidelines and reviews for this purpose. Although clozapine is indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia based on its superior efficacy, studies have proposed that clozapine may have specific properties that ameliorate aggression and hostility that are distinct from its antipsychotic effects. A literature review was conducted on June 3, 2023, using the US National Library of Medicine\'s PubMed resource to identify articles focusing on clozapine for the treatment of aggression, violence, and/or hostility in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The majority of evidence, including from randomized control trials, supports the utilization of clozapine as maintenance treatment for persistent aggressive behavior in patients with schizophrenia, and supports that its anti-aggressive effects may be independent from its antipsychotic properties (e.g. - treatment of hallucinations and delusions). Future randomized control studies evaluating clozapine and clozapine serum levels with aggression as the primary outcome would be of benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可乐定是一种α-肾上腺素受体激动剂,作用于大脑和外周组织中的受体,导致交感神经流出和某些神经递质释放的减少。可乐定在各种医疗条件下具有多种用途。它的用途之一是作为麻醉剂和镇痛剂的佐剂,特别是阿片类药物,主要通过静脉和硬膜外途径给药。阿片类药物,在癌症疼痛管理中有效,与各种副作用有关,如镇静,瘙痒,便秘,恶心,呼吸抑制,宽容和依赖。可乐定与阿片类药物的组合似乎有助于实现更好的疼痛管理和减少阿片类药物的需求。在姑息治疗中使用可乐定并不常见,但它在控制癌症疼痛和激动等症状方面的潜在益处逐渐得到认可。这种组合方法已经在姑息治疗环境中进行了探索,包括癌症疼痛和激动,患者经历复杂和难治性症状。它似乎有很好的耐受性,并提供更好的症状缓解。关于可乐定在癌症疼痛和躁动管理中的应用的现有文献,尤其是皮下形式,是有限的和过时的。因此,最佳剂量,皮下可乐定的安全性和总体有效性需要通过前瞻性研究进一步探索.
    Clonidine is an α-adrenoceptor agonist acting on receptors in the brain and peripheral tissues, leading to a reduction in sympathetic outflow and release of certain neurotransmitters. Clonidine has multiple uses across various medical conditions. One of its uses is as adjuvant to anaesthetic and analgesic agents specially opioids, mostly administered through intravenous and epidural routes. The opioids, effective in cancer pain management, are associated with various side effects such as sedation, pruritus, constipation, nausea, respiratory depression, tolerance and dependence. Combination of clonidine with opioids seems to help to achieve better pain management and less need of opioids. Use of clonidine in palliative care has been less common, but it is gradually gaining recognition for its potential benefits in managing symptoms like cancer pain and agitation. This combination approach has been explored in palliative care settings, including cancer pain and agitation, where patients experience complex and refractory symptoms. It seems to be well tolerated and gives better symptom relief. The available literature on clonidine\'s use in cancer pain and agitation management, especially in subcutaneous form, is limited and outdated. Therefore, the optimal dosing, safety profile and overall effectiveness of subcutaneous clonidine requires further exploration through prospective research studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:分析右美托咪定与咪达唑仑治疗非心脏手术患者氯胺酮引起的谵妄的有效性。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:本综述使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)22的首选报告项目中概述的指南。PubMed,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),MEDLINE,科克伦图书馆,EBSCOhost,美国国立卫生研究院临床试验,谷歌学者,和灰色文献进行了相关研究。只有同行评审的非实验研究,准实验研究,纳入有或无荟萃分析的随机对照试验.使用约翰霍普金斯护理循证实践指南对质量评级和证据水平进行评估。
    结果:五个盲法随机对照试验,三个准实验研究,本综述对由1,024名受试者组成的两项回顾性非实验性研究进行了评估.右美托咪定在减少成人患者氯胺酮诱导的谵妄方面更有效,尽管咪达唑仑在儿科患者中更好地减弱氯胺酮的精神模拟作用。此外,在接受右美托咪定和咪达唑仑治疗的患者中,麻醉后护理单元的出院时间相似.这篇综述中的研究被归类为I级,二级,或III级,评级为A级,暗示对右美托咪定在评价的所有结局指标中的实际效果有很强的信心.
    结论:目前的证据表明右美托咪定是缓解非心脏手术成人患者氯胺酮诱导的谵妄的有效替代方案。该综述中的多项研究指出,右美托咪定联合氯胺酮给药后,血流动力学改善,术后镇痛需求降低。
    OBJECTIVE: Analyze the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam for the treatment of ketamine-induced emergence delirium in noncardiac surgical patients.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)22 were used for this review. PubMed, Cumulative Index To Nursing And Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, National Institute of Health clinical trials, Google Scholar, and gray literature were searched for relevant studies. Only peer-reviewed nonexperimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, and randomized control trials with or without meta-analysis were included. The evidence was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice guidelines for quality ratings and evidence level.
    RESULTS: Five blinded randomized controlled trials, three quasi-experimental studies, and two retrospective nonexperimental studies comprised of 1,024 subjects were evaluated for this review. Dexmedetomidine was more effective at reducing ketamine-induced delirium in adult patients, although midazolam attenuated the psychomimetic effects of ketamine better in pediatric patients. Furthermore, postanesthesia care unit discharge times were similar between patients treated with dexmedetomidine and midazolam. The studies in this review were categorized as Level I, Level II, or Level III and rated Grade A, implying strong confidence in the actual effects of dexmedetomidine in all outcome measures of the review.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that dexmedetomidine is an effective alternative for alleviating ketamine-induced delirium in noncardiac adult surgical patients. Multiple studies in this review noted improved hemodynamics and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements after administration of dexmedetomidine in conjunction with ketamine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号