未经评估:本研究检查了幼儿时期父母睡眠支持行为与14种文化气质的关系。我们假设被动睡眠支持技术(例如,说话,拥抱),但不是主动技术(例如,走路,一起做一项活动),将与挑战性较小的气质特征相关:较高的Surgency(SUR)和努力控制(EC)和较低的负面情绪(NE),细粒度的维度表现出与其首要因素一致的关系(例如,NE维度的并行被动睡眠支持方法效应)。
未经评估:14个文化(每个地点M=61个家庭)的看护者(N=841)报告了幼儿(17至40个月大;52%为男性)的气质和睡眠支持活动。利用线性多水平回归模型和组均值居中程序,我们评估了文化差异和文化内部差异在睡眠支持行为中与气质相关的作用.
UNASSIGNED:被动睡眠支持技术的文化内部和文化之间的差异都与气质属性有关,(例如,培养间水平的NE较低;培养内EC较高)。对于主动技术,只有培养内的影响是显著的(例如,证明与NE呈正相关)。与仅儿童年龄和性别相比,在回归模型中添加睡眠支持行为在文化气质之间的差异显着增加。
未经评估:假设得到了很大支持。研究结果表明,父母的睡眠习惯可能是干预措施的潜在目标,以减轻挑战性气质特征带来的风险(例如,减少与更大的痛苦倾向性和NE相关的主动技术)。
UNASSIGNED: The present study examined parental sleep-supporting practices during
toddlerhood in relation to temperament across 14 cultures. We hypothesized that passive sleep-supporting techniques (e.g., talking, cuddling), but not active techniques (e.g., walking, doing an activity together), would be associated with less challenging temperament profiles: higher Surgency (SUR) and Effortful Control (EC) and lower Negative Emotionality (NE), with fine-grained dimensions exhibiting relationships consistent with their overarching factors (e.g., parallel passive sleep-supporting approach effects for dimensions of NE).
UNASSIGNED: Caregivers (N = 841) across 14 cultures (M = 61 families per site) reported toddler (between 17 and 40 months of age; 52% male) temperament and sleep-supporting activities. Utilizing linear multilevel regression models and group-mean centering procedures, we assessed the role of between- and within-cultural variance in sleep-supporting practices in relation to temperament.
UNASSIGNED: Both within-and between-culture differences in passive sleep-supporting techniques were associated with temperament attributes, (e.g., lower NE at the between-culture level; higher within-culture EC). For active techniques only within-culture effects were significant (e.g., demonstrating a positive association with NE). Adding sleep-supporting behaviors to the regression models accounted for significantly more between-culture temperament variance than child age and gender alone.
UNASSIGNED: Hypotheses were largely supported. Findings suggest parental sleep practices could be potential targets for interventions to mitigate risk posed by challenging temperament profiles (e.g., reducing active techniques that are associated with greater distress proneness and NE).