scaphoid fracture

舟骨骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨3D打印引导辅助经皮治疗延迟诊断或表现的舟骨骨折(HerbertB2)的价值。
    方法:自2018年10月至2022年2月,采用3D打印导向器辅助经皮内固定而不进行植骨治疗10例延迟诊断和表现为最小移位舟骨腰部骨折的患者。该技术基于患者的术前CT并导入软件。基于布尔减法,确定了最集中的螺钉放置位置,并制作了定制指南。术中经皮插入导丝由定制引导件辅助。
    结果:所有10例患者一次成功。骨折在术后平均7.7周(6-10周)愈合。平均随访7.7个月(6-13个月),患者腕关节功能恢复良好,疼痛减轻幅度最小.术后无重大并发症,患者均恢复了受伤前的活动。
    结论:基于3D打印指南的经皮内固定是一种安全有效的技术,可延迟诊断或提示舟骨腰部最小移位骨折患者。该方法允许容易地插入螺钉并且避免多次尝试。
    OBJECTIVE: To Investigate the value of 3D printed guide-assisted percutaneous management of minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures(Herbert\'s B2) with delayed diagnosis or presentation.
    METHODS: From October 2018 to February 2022, 10 patients with established delayed diagnoses and presentation of minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures were treated with 3D printed guides assisted with percutaneous internal fixation without bone grafting. This technique was based on the patient\'s preoperative CT and imported into the software. Based on Boolean subtraction, the most centralized screw placement position was identified and a customized guide was produced. Intraoperative percutaneous insertion of the guide wire was assisted by the custom guide.
    RESULTS: All 10 patients were successful in one attempt. The fractures healed at a mean of 7.7 weeks postoperatively (range 6-10 weeks). At a mean follow-up of 7.7 months (6-13 months), patients had excellent recovery of wrist function with minimal pain reduction. There were no major postoperative complications and the patients all returned to their previous activities before the injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous internal fixation based on 3D printed guides is a safe and effective technique for delayed diagnosis or presentation of patients with minimally displaced fractures of the scaphoid waist. This method allows for easy insertion of screws and avoids multiple attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较机器人辅助和传统徒手经皮舟骨固定的导丝尝试次数,透视时间的持续时间,辐射剂量,和螺丝中心。
    方法:将20个尸体标本随机分为机器人组或徒手组。两组的舟骨均由我们手外科的同一主治医师或住院医师固定。操作持续时间,术中透视的辐射量,总透视时间,记录并比较导丝尝试次数.术后,所有标本都进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,并检查了螺钉的最终位置和舟骨的中心轴的差异。
    结果:在机器人组中,所有的导丝都在一次尝试中令人满意地定位,而传统徒手组的尝试次数中位数为18(四元数14-65)。这也意味着与徒手组相比,机器人组中的外科医生经历了显着更低的辐射暴露剂量和时间。与舟骨的中心轴相比,两组的最终螺钉位置没有显着差异。尽管机器人组的外科医生表现没有差异,与徒手组的住院医师相比,主治医师的手术时间明显较短。
    结论:机器人辅助手术治疗舟骨骨折优于传统徒手固定方法,因为它有助于准确放置螺钉,辐射暴露较低,导丝尝试较少。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the robotic-assisted and the traditional freehand percutaneous scaphoid fixation in number of guidewire attempts, duration of fluoroscopy time, amount of radiation dose, and screw centrality.
    METHODS: Twenty cadaveric specimens were randomized into either the robotic or freehand group. The scaphoids in both groups were fixed by either the same attending or resident from our hand surgery department. The operation duration, amount of radiation from intraoperative fluoroscopy, total fluoroscopy time, and the number of guidewire attempts were documented and compared. Postoperatively, all the specimens had a computed tomography (CT) scan performed, and the difference in the final position of the screw and the central axis of the scaphoid was examined.
    RESULTS: In the robotic group, all the guide wires were satisfactorily positioned within a single attempt, while the median number of attempts in the traditional freehand group was 18 (quaternion 14-65). This also meant that the surgeon in the robotic group experienced significantly lower radiation exposure dose and time as compared to the freehand group. There were no significant differences in the final screw position as compared to the central axis of the scaphoid in both groups. Although there was no difference in surgeon performance in the robotic group, the operative time for the attending was significantly lower as compared to the resident in the freehand group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted surgery for scaphoid fracture fixation is superior to the traditional freehand method as it facilitates accurate screw placement with lower radiation exposure and fewer guide wire attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不稳定舟骨骨折和骨不连的治疗对于手外科医师来说仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。微创治疗已成为首选的治疗方法。
    目的:本研究介绍了关节镜下两个无头加压螺钉(HCS)固定和桡骨远端植骨技术,用于治疗不稳定性舟骨骨折和骨不连。旨在评估其临床和放射学结果。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究。从2019年1月到2021年2月,共有23名患者被纳入本研究。其中,13例不稳定舟骨骨折患者接受了两次HCS的关节镜治疗;10例舟骨骨不连患者接受了两次HCS和桡骨远端植骨的关节镜治疗。手腕的活动范围,视觉模拟量表(VAS),握力,改良梅奥腕部评分(MMWS),患者额定腕部评估(PRWE)评分,和手臂的残疾,在术前和最终随访时收集肩手(DASH)评分。对每位患者进行腕部计算机断层扫描,以分析随访期间的愈合和术后骨关节炎。
    结果:仅在腕关节伸展方面观察到显著改善。临床结果,包括握力,VAS疼痛评分,MMWS,PRWE得分,最终随访时DASH评分显著改善。在亚组分析中,两个患者稳定了两个HCS或桡骨远端植骨和两个HCS手术后改善了临床结果。分别。所有患者均实现了联合。未发生螺钉固定失败,在任何患者中均未观察到其他术后并发症。
    结论:关节镜下双HCS固定和桡骨远端植骨技术是治疗不稳定性舟骨骨折和骨不连的可靠有效技术。提供令人满意的愈合率和临床结果。
    BACKGROUND: The treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion remains a challenging problem for hand surgeons. Minimally invasive treatment has become the preferred method of treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: This study introduces the arthroscopic technique with two headless compression screws (HCS) fixation and distal radius bone grafting for the treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion, aiming to evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes.
    METHODS: It was a retrospective study. From January 2019 to February 2021, a total of 23 patients were included in the current study. Among them, 13 patients with unstable scaphoid fracture underwent arthroscopic treatment with two HCS; 10 patients with scaphoid nonunion underwent arthroscopic treatment with two HCS and a distal radius bone graft. The range of motion of the wrist, visual analog scale (VAS), grip strength, the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were collected at preoperatively and the final follow-up. A computed tomography scan of the wrist was performed on each patient to analyze for union and postoperative osteoarthritis during the follow-up period.
    RESULTS: Significant improvement was only observed in wrist extension. Clinical outcomes including grip strength, VAS pain score, MMWS, PRWE score, and DASH score were significantly improved at the final follow-up. In the subgroup analysis, both patients stabilized with either two HCS or a distal radius bone graft and two HCS have improved clinical outcomes after surgery, respectively. All patients achieved union. No screw fixation failure occurred, and no other postoperative complication was observed in any of the patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic technique with two-HCS fixation and distal radius bone grafting is a reliable and effective technique for the treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion, providing satisfactory union rates and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨采用三维打印导向经皮内固定治疗10例微创移位舟骨腰部骨折的可行性和疗效。
    方法:使用术前计算机断层扫描检查骨折。使用计算机断层扫描数据重建皮肤界面和骨骼模型。引导线的插入由引导线辅助。手术后4-6周进行计算机断层扫描,直到确认骨折愈合。平均随访期为7个月(范围,6-9个月)。骨折愈合时间,握力,屈伸弧,对患者进行腕部评估,记录了Mayo的手腕评分.
    结果:共有6只手位于优势肢。平均手术时间为41分钟(范围,32-70分钟)。三(30%)舟骨在手术后6周愈合,8(80%)舟骨在手术后8周愈合,手术后12周,100%的舟骨愈合。在纠正手部优势之后,平均握力为84%(范围,对侧的71%至95%)。屈伸弧为97%(范围,对侧的82%至100%)。Mayo手腕的平均得分为95(范围,85-100),疼痛降低到最低水平。所有患者都恢复了受伤前的活动。
    结论:三维打印是一种有效且可行的技术,可帮助指导术中过程。
    This study aimed to explore the feasibility and efficacy of percutaneous fixation of minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures using a 3-dimensional-printed guide in 10 cases.
    Fractures were examined using preoperative computed tomography. The skin interface and bone models were reconstructed using computed tomography data. Guidewire insertion was assisted by a guide. Computed tomography was performed 4-6 weeks after surgery until healing of the fracture was confirmed. The mean follow-up period was 7 months (range, 6-9 months). The fracture healing time, grip strength, flexion-extension arc, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and Mayo wrist score were recorded.
    A total of 6 hands were in the dominant limb. The mean operation time was 41 minutes (range, 32-70 minutes). Three (30%) scaphoids healed at 6 weeks after surgery, 8 (80%) scaphoids healed at 8 weeks after surgery, and 100% scaphoids healed at 12 weeks after surgery. After correcting for hand dominance, the mean grip strength was 84% (range, 71% to 95%) of that of the contralateral side. The flexion-extension arc was 97% (range, 82% to 100%) of that of the contralateral side. The mean Mayo wrist score was 95 (range, 85-100), and pain decreased to minimal levels. All patients returned to their preinjury activities.
    Three-dimensional printing is an effective and feasible technology that can help guide intraoperative processes.
    Therapeutic V.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:舟骨骨折是最常见的腕骨骨折,也是最具挑战性的骨折。目的探讨并比较透视下闭合复位经皮空心钉内固定术与关节镜辅助经皮空心钉内固定术治疗HerbertB2型急性舟骨骨折的临床效果。
    方法:对我院2017年1月至2021年6月收治的29例HerbertB2型急性舟骨骨折患者进行回顾性对照研究。患者分为两组,11例患者采用透视下闭合复位经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗,18例患者采用关节镜辅助经皮空心螺钉内固定治疗。手术时间,术中透视次数,骨折愈合时间,并发症,比较两组患者术后腕关节功能评分。
    结果:所有患者均获随访6~18个月(平均随访时间10.38±2.69个月)。关节镜组和透视组手术时间分别为51.50±6.69min和56.73±11.48min,分别为(p>0.05)。关节镜组的透视次数为(6.83±1.30),小于透视组(10.91±2.62)(p<0.05)。关节镜组所有骨折术后均愈合,骨折愈合时间为11.44±1.25W。透视组有10例患者痊愈。骨折愈合时间为13.60±2.32W,关节镜组骨折愈合时间少于透视组(p<0.05)。透视组有1例骨不连,植骨和内固定后愈合。术后6个月随访,改良的Mayo腕关节功能评分用于评估临床结果.关节镜组患者的腕关节功能评分为90分(85,95分),透视组>80(80,90)(z=2.74,p<0.05)。
    结论:对于骨折位移>1mm的HerbertB2型急性舟骨骨折,关节镜辅助经皮空心螺钉内固定的透视次数较少,骨折愈合时间短,与透视相比,腕关节功能恢复效果良好。
    OBJECTIVE: Scaphoid fracture was the most common carpal fracture and the most challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical effects of closed reduction and percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation under fluoroscopy and arthroscopy-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation in the treatment of Herbert B2-type of acute scaphoid fractures.
    METHODS: A retrospective controlled study was conducted on 29 patients with Herbert B2-type acute scaphoid fracture with a displacement of >1 mm admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to June 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, 11 patients were treated with closed reduction percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation under fluoroscopy and 18 patients were treated with percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation assisted by arthroscopy. The operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, fracture healing time, complications, and postoperative wrist function score of the two groups were compared.
    RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 6-18 months (mean follow-up duration: 10.38 ± 2.69 months). The respective operation times in the arthroscopy group and fluoroscopy group was 51.50 ± 6.69 min and 56.73 ± 11.48 min, respectively (p > 0.05). The number of fluoroscopies performed in the arthroscopy group was (6.83 ± 1.30), which was less than that in the fluoroscopy group (10.91 ± 2.62) (p < 0.05). All fractures in the arthroscopy group healed after the operation, and the fracture healing time was 11.44 ± 1.25W. Ten patients in the fluoroscopy group healed. The fracture healing time was 13.60 ± 2.32 W. The fracture healing time in arthroscopy group was less than that in the fluoroscopy group (p < 0.05). One patient in the fluoroscopy group had nonunion and healed after bone grafting and internal fixation. At the postoperative 6-month follow-up, the modified Mayo wrist function score was used to evaluate the clinical results. The wrist function score of patients in the arthroscopy group was 90 (85, 95), which was >80 (80, 90) in the fluoroscopy group (z = 2.74, p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: For Herbert B2-type acute scaphoid fracture with fracture displacement > 1 mm, the arthroscopy-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation has less fluoroscopy times, short fracture healing time, and good recovery effect of wrist function compared to the fluoroscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    我们比较了机器人辅助舟骨螺钉固定与传统技术的准确性,手术次数,辐射暴露,和临床结果,包括运动范围,握力,功能评分,和并发症。
    这项研究已注册,prospective,随机化,对照试验。从2019年5月到2019年12月,1名外科医生进行了18次机器人辅助和18次常规舟骨螺钉固定,这些患者有资格参与这项研究。手术时间,包括整个过程的时间,设置时间,和理想的导丝放置时间,被记录下来。还记录了导丝尝试的次数。在随访时对所有患者进行了临床和影像学评估,以评估疼痛的严重程度。手腕运动,握力,并发症,和梅奥修改手腕得分。
    与传统组相比,机器人辅助组的平均设置时间和手术总时间更长,而机器人辅助组的平均导丝插入时间和平均导丝尝试次数少于传统组。机器人组的总体辐射暴露较低。
    机器人辅助技术提供了一种有用的工具来提高植入精度和缩短辐射暴露。在没有临床评分改善的证据的情况下,额外的费用和手术持续时间延长可能会限制该技术的广泛接受。
    治疗II.
    We compared robotic-assisted scaphoid screw fixation to conventional technique in terms of accuracy, surgical times, radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes, including range of motion, grip strength, functional score, and complications.
    This study was a registered, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. From May 2019 to December 2019, 1 surgeon performed 18 robotic-assisted and 18 conventional scaphoid screw fixations and these patients were eligible for participation in this study. Surgical time, including the time of the overall procedure, set-up time, and time for ideal guidewire placement, was recorded. The number of guidewire attempts also was recorded. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at follow-up with respect to the severity of pain, wrist motion, grip strength, complications, and Mayo modified wrist score.
    The average set-up time and overall time of the procedure were longer in the robotic-assisted than in the conventional groups, while the mean guidewire insertion time and the mean guidewire attempts was less in the robotic-assisted group than that of the conventional group. The overall radiation exposure was lower in the robotic group.
    Robotic-assisted technique provided a useful tool to improve implantation accuracy and shorten radiation exposure. Additional cost and prolonged duration of surgery without evidence of improved clinical scores may limit widespread acceptance of this technique.
    Therapeutic II.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在开发和评估卷积神经网络,以识别X射线照片上的舟骨骨折。在2010年至2020年之间,从骨科转诊中心采集了1918例腕部X射线照片(600例患者)的数据集。对YOLOv3和MobileNetV3卷积神经网络进行了训练,用于舟骨的检测和骨折分类,分别。将卷积神经网络的诊断性能与四位手外科医师的多数决策进行了比较。卷积神经网络实现了82%的灵敏度和94%的特异性,接收器工作特性下的面积为92%,而外科医生的敏感性为76%,特异性为96%.比较表明,卷积神经网络的性能与外科医生的多数投票相似。这进一步揭示了卷积神经网络可以用于可靠地识别X射线照片上的舟骨骨折,并有潜力达到专家级的业绩。证据等级:III.
    This study aimed to develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network for identifying scaphoid fractures on radiographs. A dataset of 1918 wrist radiographs (600 patients) was taken from an orthopaedic referral centre between 2010 to 2020. A YOLOv3 and a MobileNetV3 convolutional neural network were trained for scaphoid detection and fracture classification, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the convolutional neural network was compared with the majority decision of four hand surgeons. The convolutional neural network achieved a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 94%, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 92%, whereas the surgeons achieved a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 96%. The comparison indicated that the convolutional neural network\'s performance was similar to the majority vote of surgeons. It further revealed that convolutional neural network could be used in identifying scaphoid fractures on radiographs reliably, and has potential to achieve the expert-level performance.Level of evidence: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨舟骨骨折骨不连的流行病学特征,对了解其发生原因和制定有效的预防策略具有重要意义。然而,这种知识是有限的,特别是在中国。本研究旨在揭示中国舟骨骨折骨不连的临床和流行病学特征。
    方法:这是一项回顾性研究,这是基于2009年8月1日至2020年8月1日在中国国家骨科转诊中心治疗的舟骨骨折不愈合患者。基本的人口统计学和临床特征,包括性别,诊断舟骨骨折不愈合的年龄,支配的手,骨折的位置,侧面,受伤的原因,受伤的年龄,舟骨骨折骨不连的治疗年龄,和延迟期,是从医疗记录中找到的.根据患者是否在受伤后1个月内就诊,将患者分为非延迟组和延迟组。舟骨骨折分为近端,腰部,根据位置和远端骨折。当因变量为连续变量时,采用t检验或Mann-WhitneyU检验比较组间差异,而当因变量是分类变量时,使用卡方检验。
    结果:本研究共纳入363例患者。诊断舟骨骨折不愈合的平均年龄为32岁(14至78岁)。腰部骨折不愈合(76.5%)最为常见。在受伤后1个月内寻求医疗护理的169名患者中(非延误组),超过一半(90例)被误诊。23例无法回忆起伤害,所以延迟时间无法确定。在171例因急性损伤而未就医的患者中(延迟组),从初次损伤到治疗的平均时间为52个月。延迟组患者的腰不愈合比例高于非延迟组。
    结论:我国舟骨骨折骨不连的主要原因是延误治疗和误诊。提示及时治疗和改善诊断可以降低患病率。骨折位置可能是导致延迟寻求医疗护理的因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Studies exploring the epidemiological characteristics of scaphoid fracture nonunion are important to understand the causes and lead to effective prevention strategy. However, such knowledge is limited especially in China. This study aims to reveal the clinical and epidemiological features of scaphoid fracture nonunion in Chinese patients.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study, which was based on patients with scaphoid fracture nonunion treated in a Chinese national orthopedic referral center from 1 August 2009 to 1 August 2020. The basic demographic and clinical characteristics, including gender, age at diagnosis of scaphoid fracture nonunion, dominant hand, the location of fracture, the side, the causes of the injury, age of the injury, age of the treatment for scaphoid fracture nonunion, and the delay period, were retrieved from the medical records. The patients were divided into a non-delay group and a delay group based on whether they had visited the doctor within 1 month after the injury. Scaphoid fracture was classified into the proximal, waist, and distal fractures according to the location. The t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the difference between groups when the dependent variable is continuous, while a chi-square test was used when the dependent variable is categorical.
    RESULTS: A total of 363 patients were included in this study. The mean age at the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture nonunion was 32 (ranging from 14 to 78). Waist fracture nonunion (76.5%) was most common. Among the 169 patients who sought medical care within 1 month after the injury (non-delay group), more than half (90 cases) were misdiagnosed. 23 cases could not recall the injury, so the time of delay could not be determined. Among the 171 patients who did not seek medical care for acute injury (delay group), the average time was 52 months between the initial injury and the treatment. The proportion of waist nonunions was higher among patients in the delay group than that in the non-delay group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nonunion of scaphoid fracture is caused mainly by delayed treatment and misdiagnosis in China, suggesting that timely treatment and improved diagnosis could lower the prevalence. The fracture location may be a factor contributing to the delaying of seeking medical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估效率,安全,与传统的经皮徒手方法相比,使用机器人辅助方法进行空心螺钉固定的准确性。
    方法:这项回顾性临床研究包括2018年6月至2020年6月通过机器人辅助技术或传统经皮徒手技术进行空心螺钉固定的18例舟状骨骨折患者。将所有患者分为机器人辅助组(9例)和传统手术组(9例)。操作时间,失血,术中荧光镜检查的数量,骨折愈合时间,梅奥手腕功能评分,记录两组螺钉植入的准确性。
    结果:机器人辅助组的平均年龄为37.9±10.6岁(范围为30至52岁),有8个雄性和1个雌性,右侧舟骨骨折6例,左侧骨折3例。术前平均时间为2.8±0.7天(1至3天)。传统手术组平均年龄为31.6±6.8岁(范围为20~45岁),有8个雄性和1个雌性,右侧舟骨骨折5例,左侧骨折4例。术前平均时间为2.1±0.8天(范围为2至4天)。传统手术组术中透视次数为24.4±3.5,而机器人辅助组只有10.1±1.9,显著降低(P<0.05)。传统手术组平均手术时间为48.4±12.2min,机器人辅助组为32.6±4.2分钟,显著缩短(P<0.05)。在冠状位和矢状位术后CT图像上,实际螺钉位置与舟骨中心轴之间的角度分别为:传统手术组8.3°±2.3°和8.8°±1.6°,机器人辅助组3.8°±0.8°和4.3°±1.2°,因此机器人辅助组的准确性明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者腕关节功能恢复及骨折愈合时间差异无统计学意义。
    结论:机器人辅助治疗舟骨骨折比传统徒手技术更准确,具有较短的手术时间和较少的术中透视。两种手术技术在术中出血方面没有区别,术后骨折愈合,或功能恢复。机器人辅助手术是安全的,有效,治疗舟骨骨折的准确方法。
    The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency, safety, and accuracy of cannulated screw fixation using a robot-assisted method compared with a traditional percutaneous freehand method.
    This retrospective clinical study included 18 patients with scaphoid fracture who underwent cannulated screw fixation by robot-assisted technique or traditional percutaneous freehand technique from June 2018 to June 2020. All patients were divided into the robot-assisted group (9 patients) or the traditional surgery group (9 patients). The operation time, blood loss, number of intra-operative fluoroscopies, fracture healing time, Mayo wrist function score, and screw implantation accuracy were recorded in the two groups.
    The average age of the robot-assisted group was 37.9 ± 10.6 years (with a range of 30 to 52 years), there were eight males and one female, and there were six cases of scaphoid fracture on the right side and three on the left side. The average pre-operative time was 2.8 ± 0.7 days (ranging from 1 to 3 days). The average age of the traditional surgery group was 31.6 ± 6.8 years (with a range of 20 to 45 years), there were eight males and one female, and there were five cases of scaphoid fracture on the right side and four on the left side. The average pre-operative time was 2.1 ± 0.8 days (with a range of 2 to 4 days). The number of intra-operative fluoroscopies was 24.4 ± 3.5 in the traditional surgery group, whereas it was only 10.1 ± 1.9 in the robot-assisted group, which was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The average operation time of the traditional operation group was 48.4 ± 12.2 min, and that of the robot-assisted group was 32.6 ± 4.2 minutes, which was significantly shorter (P < 0.05). The angles between the actual screw position and the central axis of the scaphoid on both the coronal and sagittal post-operative CT images were 8.3° ± 2.3° and 8.8° ± 1.6° for the traditional operation group and 3.8° ± 0.8° and 4.3° ± 1.2° for the robot-assisted group, so the accuracy of the robot-assisted group was significantly higher (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in wrist function recovery or fracture healing time.
    Robot-assisted treatment of scaphoid fracture is more accurate than traditional freehand technology, with shorter operation time and fewer intra-operative fluoroscopies. There is no difference between the two surgical techniques in intra-operative bleeding, post-operative fracture healing, or functional recovery. Robot-assisted surgery is a safe, effective, and accurate method for treating scaphoid fracture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Seven aspects of the management of acute scaphoid fractures are open to debate: Diagnosis of true fractures among suspected fractures, assessment of fracture displacement, cast immobilization strategies, the role of surgical fixation, proximal pole fractures, assessment of union, and the underlying objective of treatment. We reviewed current evidence, and our varied interpretations of it, to highlight areas of uncertainty where more evidence might be helpful.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号