在当前的大数据时代,解决人们对健康素养的需求至关重要。目前,传统的科学健康知识和信息技术传播模式是可以互换的,从而出现了一种新的健康素养传播模式。有针对性地宣传健康教育和健康素养,为了满足公众的需要,并了解公众对学科的需求,内容,在COVID-19时代,健康素养服务形式发生了变化,对公众对健康信息和健康素养的需求进行了调查。
这项研究旨在了解健康素养服务提供者的需求差异,内容,频道,forms,以及不同性别的中国公民的设施,年龄,教育水平,经济条件,和生活环境,并为发展公共卫生素养提供合理建议。
问卷之星被用来进行大量随机在线调查。在武汉,湖北省,发放了2184份问卷,取消了8份无效问卷,2176人被回收,有效率为99.6%。IBMSPSSStatistics20用于分析调查数据。
(1)在公众选择的健康素养服务提供者中,政府部门或政府与其他机构合作的比例超过73%,表明健康素养服务是公共产品;(2)乡镇地区获得健康素养服务的机会低于城市地区(P<0.001,3)互联网媒体和与熟人交流,普及率最高的,也是公众最不信任的两个渠道;(4)不同性别居民健康素养内容和服务渠道的差异,年龄,教育水平,经济地位,和生活环境有统计学意义。
(1)建议建立具有多中心供应的综合健康素养服务模式。政府部门,医疗机构,媒体应有效合作,提供健康素养服务。(2)政府应重视健康教育的公平性,加强乡镇地区健康素养服务供给。(3)加强公众对网络信息的鉴别能力,注重科学思维的培养。(4)健康素养服务的提供者必须关注公众需求之间的差异,完善健康素养服务的内涵。
In the current era of big data, it is critical to address people\'s demand for health literacy. At present, the traditional mode of communicating scientific health knowledge and information technology is interchangeable, resulting in the emergence of a new mode of communicating health literacy. To publicize health education and health literacy in a targeted way, to meet the public\'s needs, and to understand how the public\'s demand for subjects, contents, and forms of health literacy service has changed in the era of COVID-19, the investigation of public\'s demand for health information and health literacy was conducted.
This study aims to understand the differences in demand for health literacy service providers, contents, channels, forms, and facilities among Chinese citizens with different genders, ages, education levels, economic conditions, and living environments, and to provide reasonable recommendations for developing public health literacy.
Questionnaire Star was used to conduct a large sample of random online surveys. In Wuhan, Hubei Province, 2184 questionnaires were issued, 8 invalid questionnaires were eliminated, and 2176 were recovered, with an effective rate of 99.6%. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 was utilized to analyze the survey data.
(1) In health literacy service providers selected by the public, the proportion of government departments or government collaboration with other institutions exceeded 73%, indicating that health literacy services are public goods; (2) access to health literacy services was lower in township areas than in urban areas (P < 0.001, 3) internet media and communicating with acquaintances, which have the highest popularity rate, were also the two channels that were least trusted by the public; and (4) the differences in contents and service channels of health literacy among residents with different genders, ages, education levels, economic status, and living environments were statistically significant.
(1) It is recommended to establish an integrated health literacy service model with multi-center supply. Government departments, medical institutions, and media should cooperate effectively to provide health literacy services. (2) The government should pay attention to the fairness of health education and strengthen the supply of health literacy services in township areas. (3) It is critical to strengthen the public\'s ability to discriminate network information and pay attention to scientific thinking cultivation. (4) Health literacy service providers must focus on the differences between public demands and improve the connotation of health literacy services.