UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in individuals with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Databases from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were all thoroughly searched for pertinent research. Outcomes include complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), disease progression (PD), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) were retrieved for further analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Ten trials with 721 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results for patients with cervical cancer receiving pembrolizumab were as follows: CR (0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.10), PR (0.15, 95%CI: 0.08-0.22), SD (0.16, 95%CI: 0.13-0.20), PD (0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-0.75), ORR (0.26, 95%CI: 0.11-0.41) and DCR (0.42, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71), respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled mPFS and mOS were 3.81 and 10.15 months. Subgroup analysis showed that pembrolizumab in combination was more beneficial in CR (0.16 vs. 0.03, p = 0.012), PR (0.24 vs. 0.08, p = 0.032), SD (0.11 vs. 0.19, p = 0.043), ORR (0.42 vs. 0.11, p = 0.014), and mPFS (5.54 months vs. 2.27 months, p < 0.001) than as single agent. The three most common AEs were diarrhoea (0.25), anaemia (0.25), and nausea (0.21), and the incidence of grade 3-5 AEs was significantly lower, rarely surpassing 0.10.
UNASSIGNED: For patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that pembrolizumab had a favourable efficacy and tolerability. Future research will primarily focus on optimising customised regiments that optimally integrate pembrolizumab into new therapies and combination strategies. Designed to maximise patient benefit and efficiently control adverse effects while maintaining a high standard of living.
This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in individuals with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. The study found that an upfront combination of chemotherapy and pembrolizumab immunotherapy appears to be a compelling strategy for these patients. More large-scale and multicentre randomised controlled trials will be required in the future to validate the precise benefits of pembrolizumab in new therapies and combination strategies for the treatment of cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death all over the world, and brings a heavy social economic burden especially in China. Several immuno-combination therapies have shown promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of unresectable HCC and are widely used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, which combination is the most affordable one is unknown. Our study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the immuno-combinations as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC from the perspective of Chinese payers.
METHODS: A Markov model was built according to five multicenter, phase III, open-label, randomized trials (Himalaya, IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, CARES-310, LEAP-002) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (STRIDE), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B), sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) (S + B), camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (C + R), and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (P + L). Three disease states were included: progression free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) as well as death. Medical costs were searched from West China Hospital, published literatures or the Red Book. Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated to compare costs among different combinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robust of the model.
RESULTS: The total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of C + R, S + B, P + L, A + B and STRIDE were $12,109.27 and 0.91, $26,961.60 and 1.12, $55,382.53 and 0.83, $70,985.06 and 0.90, $84,589.01 and 0.73, respectively, resulting in the most cost-effective strategy of C + R with CER of $13,306.89 per QALY followed by S + B with CER of $24,072.86 per QALY. Compared with C + R, the ICER of S + B strategy was $70,725.38 per QALY, which would become the most cost-effective when the willing-to-pay threshold exceeded $73,500/QALY. In the subgroup analysis, with the application of Asia results in Leap-002 trial, the model results were the same as global data. In the sensitivity analysis, with the variation of parameters, the results were robust.
CONCLUSIONS: As one of the promising immuno-combination therapies in the first-line systemic treatment of HCC, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib demonstrated the potential to be the most cost-effective strategy, which warranted further studies to best inform the real-world clinical practices.

BACKGROUND: Systemic conversion therapy provides patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) the chance to salvage radical liver resection and superior survival outcomes, but the optimal conversion strategy is unclear.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library between 2007 and 2024 focusing on studies reporting conversion therapy for HCC. The treatment groups were divided into Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), TKI plus loco-regional therapy (LRT), TKI plus anti-PD-1 therapy (TKI + PD-1), TKI + PD-1 + LRT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus LRT, and Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + T) groups. The conversion to surgery rate (CSR), objective response rate (ORR), grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.
RESULTS: 38 studies and 4,042 patients were included. The pooled CSR were 8% (95% CI, 5-12%) in TKI group, 13% (95% CI, 8-19%) in TKI + LRT group, 28% (95% CI, 19-37%) in TKI + PD-1 group, 33% (95% CI, 25-41%) in TKI + PD-1 + LRT group, 23% (95% CI, 1-46%) in ICI + LRT group, and 5% (95% CI, 3-8%) in A + T group, respectively. The pooled HR for OS (0.45, 95% CI, 0.35-0.60) and PFS (0.49, 95% CI, 0.35-0.70) favored survival benefit of conversion surgery. Subgroup analysis revealed that lenvatinib + PD-1 + LRT conferred higher CSR of 35% (95% CI, 26-44%) and increased ORR of 70% (95% CI, 56-83%).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that TKI + PD-1 + LRT, especially lenvatinib + PD-1 + LRT, may be the superior conversion therapy with a manageable safety profile for patients with initially unresectable HCC. The successful conversion therapy favors the superior OS and PFS compared with systemic treatment alone.
BACKGROUND: International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (registration code: CRD 42024495289).

UNASSIGNED: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a major gynecological malignancy with varying prognosis. The Neutrophil-toLymphocyte Ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a potential prognostic biomarker. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and clinical value of NLR in OC.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines, including studies that evaluated the association between NLR and survival outcomes in OC patients. Search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was done using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Heterogeneity was assessed, and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using fixed or random-effects models as appropriate.
UNASSIGNED: Sistematski pregled i meta-analiza su obavljeni u skladu sa smernicama PRISMA, uključujući studije koje su procenile povezanost između NLR i ishoda preživljavanja kod pacijenata sa OC. Pretraga je obavljena u bazama podataka PubMed, Embase, Web of Science i Cochrane Library. Procena kvaliteta je urađena korišćenjem Njukasl-Otava skale (NOS). Heterogenost je procenjena, a udruženi odnosi opasnosti (HRs) su izračunati korišćenjem modela fiksnih ili slučajnih efekata prema potrebi.
UNASSIGNED: Analizirano je dvadeset studija koje su uključivale različite etničke pripadnosti, uzraste i veličinu uzorka. Utvrđeno je da je visok NLR u obrnutoj korelaciji sa ukupnim preživljavanjem (OS) (HR=1,21, 95% CI 1,09-1,34, P<0,001) i preživljavanjem bez progresije (PFS) (HR=1,20, 95% CI 1,03-1,38, P<0,001). Stratifikovane analize su pokazale jaču povezanost kod azijskih pacijenata, studije sa manjim veličinama uzoraka, mlađim pacijentima i višim graničnim vrednostima NLR.
UNASSIGNED: Meta-analiza sugeriše značajnu inverznu povezanost između NLR i ishoda preživljavanja kod pacijenata sa OC, naglašavajući potencijal NLR-a kao jednostavnog, isplativog prognostičkog biomarkera. Međutim, značajna heterogenost i uticaj zbunjujućih faktora naglašavaju potrebu za daljim istraživanjem.

BACKGROUND: FGFR genomic aberrations occur in approximately 5-10% of human cancers. Erdafitinib has previously demonstrated efficacy and safety in FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors, such as gliomas, thoracic, gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other rare cancers. However, its efficacy and safety in Asian patients remain largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase IIa study of erdafitinib to evaluate its efficacy in Asian patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophageal cancer.
METHODS: Patients with pathologically/cytologically confirmed, advanced, or refractory tumors who met molecular and study eligibility criteria received oral erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with an option for pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg on a 28-day cycle, except for four NSCLC patients who received erdafitinib 10 mg (7 days on/7 days off) as they were recruited before the protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (cholangiocarcinoma: 22; NSCLC: 12; esophageal cancer: 1) were enrolled. At data cutoff (November 19, 2021), the objective response rate for patients with cholangiocarcinoma was 40.9% (95% CI, 20.7-63.6); the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.7) and median overall survival was 40.2 months (95% CI, 12.4-not estimable). No patient with RET/FGFR-altered NSCLC achieved objective response and the disease control rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.5-57.2%), with three patients with stable disease. The single patient with esophageal cancer achieved partial response. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (62.9%) patients. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event (all-grade, 85.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Erdafitinib demonstrated efficacy in a population of Asian patients in selected advanced solid tumors, particularly in those with advanced FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals.
BACKGROUND: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02699606); study registration (first posted): 04/03/2016.

BACKGROUND: The MONALEESA‐7 and ‐2 phase 3 randomized trials demonstrated a statistically significant progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with initial ribociclib + endocrine therapy (ET) versus placebo + ET in pre‐ and postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC), respectively. Similar trends were observed in Asian subgroup analyses. This phase 2 bridging study of initial ET + ribociclib enrolled pre‐ and postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2– ABC from China and was conducted to demonstrate consistency of PFS results in a Chinese population relative to the global MONALEESA‐7 and ‐2 studies.
METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1) to ET (nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor + goserelin for premenopausal patients; letrozole for postmenopausal patients) + either ribociclib or placebo. The primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed PFS.
RESULTS: As of April 25, 2022, the median follow‐up was 34.7 months in both cohorts. In the premenopausal cohort, median PFS was 27.6 months in the ribociclib arm (n = 79) versus 14.7 months in the placebo arm (n = 77) (hazard ratio 0.67 [95% CI: 0.45, 1.01]). In the postmenopausal cohort, median PFS was not reached in the ribociclib arm versus 18.5 months in the placebo arm (n = 77 in each arm) (hazard ratio 0.40 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.62]). Data also suggested improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints, although OS data were not mature. The safety profile in this population was consistent with that in global studies.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate a favorable benefit–risk profile for ribociclib + ET in Chinese patients.

UNASSIGNED: This scoping review and meta-analysis aimed to map the evidence regarding prognostic factors in Chinese patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis and to identify current research gaps.
UNASSIGNED: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, and CNKI databases from their inception to 15 September 2021. All studies investigated the association between any prognostic factor and target outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Chinese patients with AL amyloidosis.
UNASSIGNED: This scoping review included 52 studies, of which 44 with 6,432 patients contributed to the multivariate prognostic analysis. Multivariate analysis identified a total of 106 factors that correlated with OS, 16 factors with PFS, and 18 factors with ESRD. Five prognostic factors were significantly associated with PFS, and 11 prognostic factors were significantly associated with ESRD. Meta-analysis was only available for prognostic factors without heterogeneous cutoff values, for which hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Meta-analysis showed that bone marrow plasma cells (BMCs) (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.21-3.19, p < 0.05) and interventricular septal thickness (IVST) (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.38, p < 0.05) were independently associated with OS.
UNASSIGNED: The significant prognostic factors associated with OS, PFS, and ESRD in Chinese patients with AL amyloidosis were related to plasma cell tumor load, biological characteristics, cardiac involvement, renal involvement, population characteristics, and treatment. Further studies should explore additional prognostic factors in patients with AL amyloidosis to develop prognostic models.
The significant prognostic factors associated with OS, PFS, and ESRD in Chinese patients with AL amyloidosis were related to plasma cell tumor load, biological characteristics, cardiac involvement, renal involvement, population characteristics, and treatment.Meta-analysis showed there was a significant association between BMCs or interventricular septal thickness and OS.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides valuable tumor-related information without invasive biopsies, yet consensus is lacking on optimal parameters for predicting clinical outcomes. Utilizing longitudinal ctDNA data from the large phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) of atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with stage IV non-squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), here we report that post-treatment ctDNA response correlates significantly with radiographic response. However, only modest concordance is identified, revealing that ctDNA response is likely not a surrogate for radiographic response; both provide distinct information. Various ctDNA metrics, especially early ctDNA nadirs, emerge as primary predictors for progression-free survival and overall survival, potentially better assessing long-term benefits for chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. Integrating radiographic and ctDNA assessments enhances prediction of survival outcomes. We also identify optimal cutoff values for risk stratification and key assessment timepoints, notably Weeks 6-9, for insights into clinical outcomes. Overall, our identified optimal ctDNA parameters can enhance the prediction of clinical outcomes, refine trial designs, and inform therapeutic decisions for first-line NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related characteristics can serve as reliable prognostic biomarkers in various cancers. Herein, we aimed to construct an individualized immune prognostic signature in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: This study retrospectively included 455 NPC samples and 39 normal healthy nasopharyngeal tissue specimens. Samples from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were obtained as discovery cohort to screen candidate prognostic immune-related gene pairs based on relative expression ordering of the genes. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR was used to detect the selected genes to construct an immune-related gene pair signature in training cohort, which comprised 118 clinical samples, and was then validated in validation cohort 1, comprising 92 clinical samples, and validation cohort 2, comprising 88 samples from GEO.
RESULTS: We identified 26 immune-related gene pairs as prognostic candidates in discovery cohort. A prognostic immune signature comprising 11 immune gene pairs was constructed in training cohort. In validation cohort 1, the immune signature could significantly distinguish patients with high or low risk in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.17-6.02, P=0.015) and could serve as an independent prognostic factor for PFS in multivariate analysis (HR 2.66, 95 % CI 1.17-6.02, P=0.019). Similar results were obtained using validation cohort 2, in which PFS was significantly worse in high risk group than in low risk group (HR 3.02, 95 % CI 1.12-8.18, P=0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: The constructed immune signature showed promise for estimating prognosis in NPC. It has potential for translation into clinical practice after prospective validation.

OBJECTIVE: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are highly malignant, aggressive, and have a high incidence and mortality rate. The aim of this study was to investigate survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with HGGs.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients with histologically confirmed HGGs were included. The recruitment period was from January 2011 to December 2019. We evaluated patient demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment methods, immunocytochemistry results, overall survival (OS) time, and progression-free survival (PFS) time using Kaplan-<>Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing. Additionally, we employed Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors associated with survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the 1-, 2-, and 5-years OS rates were 81.8%, 50.3%, and 12.6%, respectively. Similarly, the 1-, 2-, and 5-years PFS rates were 50.9%, 22.4%, and 3.1%, respectively. The median OS duration was 35.0 months. The univariate analysis indicated that postoperative pathological classification, grade, and age were significantly associated with patient outcomes (p < 0.01). Among the patients, 147 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, while 12 did not. The immunohistochemical markers of ki-67, MGMT, IDH1R132H, and p53 demonstrated statistically significant differences in their prognostic impact (p = 0.001, p = 0.020, p = 0.003, and p = 0.021, respectively). In conclusion, we found that grades, age, pathological classification, ki-67, MGMT, and IDH1R132H expression were statistically significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.01, p = 0.004, p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.036, and p = 0.028). Additionally, immunohistochemical expressions of TRIB3 and AURKA were significantly higher in patients with shorter survival (p = 0.015 and p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade and the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after surgery were independent prognostic factors that significantly influenced patient survival. Additionally, tumor grade and MGMT expression were found to be independent factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS). Notably, the expression of TRIB3 and AURKA was higher in patients with poor survival outcomes.