peripherally inserted central catheter

外周插入中心导管
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)是一种广泛应用于肿瘤化疗的技术,以安全为特征,可靠性,和长停留时间。然而,导管可能由于各种原因而破裂。当急性破裂发生时,它总是导致严重的并发症,可能威胁患者的安全,并可能导致医疗纠纷。在这项研究中,我们收集并分析了我院2018年至2023年3例PICC管路断裂导致药物泄漏的病例。3例均为乳腺癌术后患者接受化疗,其中2例涉及外部部分断裂,1例涉及内部部分断裂。由于及时和适当的管理,没有发生急性破裂。我们提出了一些想法,例如选择高质量的导管材料,避免过度延伸或重复弯曲对防止PICC线路断裂至关重要。此外,建立规范、科学的PICC管理模式,确保其临床应用的安全性和有效性,包括全面评估,“四元素”干预,持续评估。
    Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is a widely used technique in oncology chemotherapy, characterized by safety, reliability, and long dwell time. However, a catheter can break due to various causes. When an acute rupture occurs, it always lead to sever complications which may threaten patients\' safety and potentially result in medical disputes. In this study, we collected and analyzed 3 cases of PICC line breakage causing drug leakage in our hospital from 2018 to 2023. All these 3 cases were postoperative breast cancer patients accepting chemotherapy, with 2 cases involving external partial breakage and 1 case involving internal partial breakage. Due to timely and appropriate management, no acute rupture occurred. We propose some ideas such as selecting high-quality catheter materials and avoiding over extension or repeated bending are crucial in preventing PICC line breakage. In addition, we also recommend establishing a standardized and scientific management pattern of PICC to ensure the safety and effectiveness of its clinical application, including comprehensive assessment, \"four-element\" intervention, and continuous evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:导管相关性血栓形成是新生儿外周中心静脉导管(PICC)的常见并发症,导致意外拔管,严重影响新生儿健康和安全。尽管广泛报道了新生儿PICC相关血栓形成的估计发生率和因素,这些发现尚未综合。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定新生儿PICC相关性血栓的发生率和危险因素。
    方法:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:两名独立研究人员系统地探索了多个数据库-例如PubMed,Medline,Embase和Cochrane图书馆-从成立到2023年10月。我们的研究汇总并审查了专门针对新生儿PICC相关血栓形成的发生率和危险因素的研究。使用RevMan5.3软件,进行荟萃分析以确定血栓形成的发生率和比值比(OR),伴随着他们各自的95%置信区间(CI)的危险因素。
    结果:共筛选327篇,24项研究的数据用于合成。新生儿PICC相关血栓形成发生率从0.23%到17.91%不等。合并发生率为2%(95%CI:1%-2%;I2=94%;p<0.0001)。该研究确定了12个危险因素,包括下肢的插入部位(OR=0.22;95%CI:0.09-0.56;p=.001),胎龄<28周,腹部病理学,第5天新鲜冷冻血浆>50mL/kg,PICC尖端位置(近端放置),两个流明,三个流明,住院时间延长,感染,母亲使用抗凝剂,患者心功能不全和双胞胎对双胞胎输血综合征供者。
    结论:分析显示新生儿PICC相关血栓形成的总体合并发生率为2%。12个因素被确定为与新生儿PICC相关血栓形成相关的风险。了解风险因素可以为提高认识提供基于证据的建议,控制和治疗以及更好的护理管理。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析阐明了与新生儿PICC相关血栓形成相关的发生率和危险因素。提供至关重要的见解,为临床决策和加强新生儿卫生保健环境中的患者护理至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Catheter-related thrombosis is a common complication of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in neonates, leading to unintended tube removal and significantly affecting neonatal health and safety. Despite widespread reporting on the estimated occurrence and factors contributing to neonatal PICC-related thrombosis, these findings have not been synthesized.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of neonatal PICC-related thrombosis.
    METHODS: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Two independent researchers systematically explored multiple databases-such as PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library-from their inception until October 2023. Our study aggregates and scrutinizes studies specifically addressing the incidence and risk factors of neonatal PICC-related thrombosis. Employing the RevMan 5.3 software, a meta-analysis was executed to determine the incidence of both thrombosis and odds ratios (OR), accompanied by their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 327 articles were screened, and data from 24 studies were used in synthesis. Neonatal PICC-related thrombosis incidence varied from 0.23% to 17.91%. The pooled incidence was 2% (95% CI: 1%-2%; I2 = 94%; p < .0001). The study identified 12 risk factors, including insertion sites in the lower extremities (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09-0.56; p = .001), gestational age <28 weeks, abdominal pathology, fresh frozen plasma by day 5 > 50 mL/kg, PICC tip location (proximal placement), two lumens, three lumens, prolonged hospital stay, infection, mothers\' use of anticoagulants, patients with cardiac insufficiency and being twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome donor.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates an overall pooled incidence of neonatal PICC-related thrombosis of 2%. Twelve factors were identified as risks associated with neonatal PICC-related thrombosis. Understanding the risk factors can provide evidence-based recommendations for improving awareness, control and treatment and better nursing management.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis illuminates the incidence and risk factors linked to neonatal PICC-related thrombosis, delivering essential insights pivotal for clinical decision-making and enhancing patient care within neonatal health care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外周插入的中心导管(PICC)经常用于延长的静脉内治疗。然而,并发症,如不正确放置在奇静脉会导致严重的健康问题。全面了解这些方面对于提高PICC程序的安全性和有效性至关重要,从而改善患者护理结果。
    这项研究是对12名患者进行的,这些患者经历了PICC错位进入奇静脉。系统审查分类信息,影像学表现,潜在的影响因素,和识别方法,预防,和管理。
    分析揭示了奇静脉内的两种PICC错位分类,每个都有独特的成像特征。它还指出了影响错位的几个因素,提供对潜在风险的宝贵见解。此外,它建立了有效的检测方法,强调成像技术的重要性。此外,它概述了预防和管理奇静脉PICC错位的策略,加强对问题的全面理解。
    研究结果强调了采取主动立场以避免错位的重要性,并强调了在发生错位时迅速和精确干预的必要性,从而提高PICC流程的安全性和有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently utilized for extended intravenous treatments. However, complications such as incorrect placement into the azygos vein can result in significant health issues. A thorough understanding of these aspects is crucial to enhance the safety and effectiveness of PICC procedures, thereby improving patient care outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: The research was conducted on a cohort of 12 patients who experienced PICC malposition into the azygos vein. Systematically reviewed information on classification, imaging manifestations, potential influencing factors, and methods for identification, prevention, and management.
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis uncovered two PICC malposition classifications within the azygos vein, each with unique imaging characteristics. It also pinpointed several factors influencing malposition, offering valuable insight into potential risks. Moreover, it established effective detection methods, underscoring the significance of imaging techniques. Additionally, it outlined strategies for preventing and managing PICC malposition in the azygos vein, enhancing overall comprehension of the issue.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings emphasize the importance of taking a proactive stance to avoid malposition and stress the necessity of prompt and precise intervention when malposition does happen, thereby enhancing the safety and effectiveness of PICC processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇综述旨在比较可用的风险评估模型(RAM)在预测成人癌症患者外周置入中心导管相关静脉血栓形成(PICC-RVT)中的性能。
    方法:从开始到2023年10月20日,对10个数据库进行了系统搜索。如果将RAM的准确性与另一个RAM的准确性进行比较,以预测成年癌症患者的PICC-RVT风险,则研究合格。两名评审员独立进行研究选择,数据提取和偏见风险评估。使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估RAM的性能。
    结果:总共筛选了1931项研究,和7项10RAM的研究被纳入审查。最广泛使用的RAM是Caprini(4项研究),帕多瓦预测评分(3项研究),Autar(3项研究),密歇根风险评分(2项研究)和西利评分(2项研究)。敏感性,模型间的特异性和准确性差异显著。值得注意的是,Caprini评分比4RAM(Wells,订正日内瓦,修改后的MRS,MRS)。密歇根风险评分比其他6个RAM具有更大的特异性(Caprini,Autar,帕多瓦,Seeley,新颖的RAM,威尔斯)。MRS的预测准确性明显高于Caprini和AutarRAM。
    结论:MRS可能是识别PICC-RVT高危患者最准确的RAM。然而,由于有限的研究可用,应进行更严格的研究,以检查不同情况下密歇根州PICC-RVT风险评分的准确性.
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to compare the performance of available risk assessment models (RAMs) for predicting peripherally inserted central catheter-related venous thrombosis (PICC-RVT) in adult patients with cancer.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across ten databases from inception to October 20, 2023. Studies were eligible if they compared the accuracy of a RAM to that of another RAM for predicting the risk of PICC-RVT in adult patients with cancer. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessments. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to evaluate the performance of the RAMs.
    RESULTS: A total of 1931 studies were screened, and 7 studies with 10 RAMs were included in the review. The most widely used RAMs were the Caprini (4 studies), Padua prediction score (3 studies), Autar (3 studies), Michigan risk score (2 studies) and Seeley score (2 studies). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy varied markedly between the models. Notably, the Caprini score achieved higher sensitivity than 4 RAMs (Wells, Revised Geneva, modified MRS, MRS). The Michigan risk score had greater specificity than did the other 6 RAMs (Caprini, Autar, Padua, Seeley, the novel RAM, Wells). The predictive accuracy of the MRS is significantly greater than that of the Caprini and Autar RAM.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MRS could be the most accurate RAM for identifying patients at high risk of PICC-RVT. However, as limited studies are available, more rigorous studies should be conducted to examine the accuracy of the Michigan risk score for PICC-RVT in different contexts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了降低细胞毒性剂泄漏的风险,外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)广泛应用于化疗前诊断为恶性肿瘤的患者。虽然炎症已被证明与深静脉血栓形成(DVT)有关,全身免疫炎症指标与PICC-DVT形成之间的联系尚不清楚.目的:本研究旨在评估PICC-DVT与包括血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在内的全身免疫炎症指标之间的关系。全身免疫炎症指数(SII),全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)。方法:2018年8月至2021年10月,我们连续纳入化疗前行PICC植入的恶性肿瘤患者。使用彩色多普勒超声评估DVT。结果:513例患者中,57例(11.1%)患者发生PICC-DVT。PLR的最佳截止值,SII和SIRI分别为260.1、1318.7和2.7。基于多元Logistic回归分析,发现PICC-DVT与PLR升高之间存在相关性(p=0.014),SII(p=.012),和SIRI(p=.022)。恶性肿瘤患者PLR值较高,SII或SIRI倾向于更有可能发展为PICC-DVT。结论:全身免疫炎症指标增加了PICC-DVT的发生风险,可作为PICC-DVT的辅助预测指标。
    Background: In order to reduce the risk of leakage of cytotoxic agents, peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are widely used in patients diagnosed with malignancy before chemotherapy. While inflammation has been demonstrated to be associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the connection between systemic immune inflammation indexes and the formation of PICC-DVT remains unclear. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the association between PICC-DVT and systemic immune inflammation indexes including platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI). Methods: From August 2018 to October 2021, we enrolled consecutive patients diagnosed with malignancy who underwent PICC implantation before chemotherapy. DVT was assessed using color Doppler ultrasonography. Results: Among the 513 patients, 57 patients (11.1%) developed PICC-DVT. The optimal cutoff values for PLR, SII and SIRI were 260.1, 1318.7, and 2.7, respectively. Based on the multiple logistic regression analysis, correlations were found between PICC-DVT and elevated PLR (p = .014), SII (p = .012), and SIRI (p = .022). Patients with malignancy having higher values of PLR, SII or SIRI tended to be more likely to develop PICC-DVT. Conclusions: The systemic immune inflammation indexes increases the risk of PICC-DVT and could be used as auxiliary predictive tests for PICC-DVT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    建立与外周插入中心导管(PICC)相关的血流感染风险的预测模型。
    回顾性纳入2020年6月至2020年12月在深圳市人民医院接受PICC治疗的患者,根据有无PICC相关性感染分为感染组和非感染组。然后,收集患者的相关临床资料,采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归(LASSO)模型筛选PICC相关感染的预测因子.此外,采用多因素logistic回归分析PICC相关感染的影响因素,根据多变量分析的结果构建列线图。最终,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析影响因素在预测PICC相关感染中的应用价值。
    共纳入505名患者,包括75例PICC相关感染患者(14.85%)。主要病原菌为革兰氏阳性球菌。LASSO筛选的预测因素包括年龄>60岁,导管运动,导管维护周期,插入技术,免疫功能,并发症,PICC置管前体温≥37.2°C。多因素logistic回归分析显示,PICC相关感染的独立危险因素包括年龄>60岁[比值比(OR)=1.722;95%置信区间(CI)=1.312~3.579;P=0.006]。导管移动(OR=1.313;95%CI=1.119-3.240;P=0.014),导管维持周期>7天(OR=2.199;95%CI=1.677-4.653;P=0.000),直接插入(OR=1.036;95%CI=1.019-2.743;P=0.000),免疫功能低下(OR=2.322;95%CI=2.012-4.579;P=0.000),并发症(OR=1.611;95%CI=1.133-3.454;P=0.019),PICC置管前体温≥37.2°C(OR=1.713;95%CI=1.172-3.654;P=0.012)。此外,ROC曲线下面积为0.889.
    PICC相关感染与年龄>60岁等因素有关,导管运动,导管维护周期,插入技术,免疫功能,并发症,PICC置管前体温≥37.2°C。此外,LASSO模型对PICC相关感染的发生具有中度预测作用.
    UNASSIGNED: To establish a predictive modeling for the risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients receiving PICC treatment in Shenzhen People\'s Hospital from June 2020 to December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the infection group and the non-infection group according to the presence and absence of PICC-related infections. Then, relevant clinical information of patients was collected and the predictors of PICC-related infection were screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) model. Besides, multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of PICC-related infection, A nomogram was constructed based on the results of the multivariate analysis. Ultimately, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to analyze the application value of influencing factors to predict PICC-related infections.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 505 patients were included, including 75 patients with PICC-related infections (14.85%). The main pathogen was gram-positive cocci. The predictors screened by LASSO included age >60 years, catheter movement, catheter maintenance cycle, insertion technique, immune function, complications, and body temperature ≥37.2 °C before PICC placement. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors of infections related to PICC included age >60 years [odds ratio (OR) = 1.722; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.312-3.579; P = 0.006], catheter movement (OR = 1.313; 95% CI = 1.119-3.240; P = 0.014), catheter maintenance cycle >7 days (OR = 2.199; 95% CI = 1.677-4.653; P = 0.000), direct insertion (OR = 1.036; 95% CI = 1.019-2.743; P = 0.000), poor immune function (OR = 2.322; 95% CI = 2.012-4.579; P = 0.000), complications (OR = 1.611; 95% CI = 1.133-3.454; P = 0.019), and body temperature ≥37.2 °C before PICC placement (OR = 1.713; 95% CI = 1.172-3.654; P = 0.012). Besides, the area under the ROC curve was 0.889.
    UNASSIGNED: PICC-related infections are associated with factors such as age >60 years, catheter movement, catheter maintenance cycle, insertion technique, immune function, complications, and body temperature ≥37.2 °C before PICC placement. Additionally, the LASSO model is moderately predictive for predicting the occurrence of PICC-related infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外周插入的中心导管广泛用于大面积烧伤患者,指南建议通过未烧伤的皮肤插入。该病例报告描述了一名患者,其烧伤面积超过88%,并遭受严重的吸入伤害。对他来说,the静脉是唯一可用于导管导管插入的未烧伤皮肤上的静脉.根据证据,当患者处于俯卧位时,我们成功地在超声下通过the静脉放置了经外周插入的中心静脉导管,并避免了相关并发症.
    Peripherally inserted central catheters are widely used in patients with extensive burns, with the guidelines recommending insertion through unburned skin. This case report describes a patient who was burned over 88% of their surface area and suffered severe inhalation injury. For him, the popliteal vein was the only vein on unburned skin available for catheter catheterization. Based on evidence, we successfully placed a peripherally inserted central catheter through the popliteal vein under ultrasound while the patient was in the prone position and avoided associated complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:外周插入中心导管(PICC)是接受静脉治疗的肿瘤患者的重要输注途径,但下肢静脉穿刺是上腔静脉综合征(SVCS)患者的首选技术。我们报告了一例下肢PICC异位至腰升静脉的患者,提示和验证下肢PICC置管安全可行。并希望为临床PICC静脉穿刺提供不同的视角,以得到同行的关注。
    方法:2022年8月24日,一名58岁的男性因间歇性咳嗽持续一个多月而入院。这在10天之前恶化了。影像学和实验室检查提示患者患有肺部恶性肿瘤和SVCS。化疗不是该患者的绝对禁忌症。下肢静脉穿刺是首选技术,因为对SVCS患者进行上肢静脉输液会加剧头部水肿,脖子,和上肢。病人和他的家人被告知了手术,并获得知情同意。穿刺成功并及时治疗后,病人出院了,症状有所缓解。
    结论:下腔静脉置管对于患有SVCS的癌症患者是罕见且重要的,特别是在涉及异位放置的复杂情况下。
    BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are an essential infusion route for oncology patients receiving intravenous treatments, but lower extremity venipuncture is the preferred technique for patients with superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). We report the case of a patient with a lower extremity PICC ectopic to the ascending lumbar vein, to indicate and verify PICC catheterisation in the lower extremity is safe and feasible. And hope to provide different perspectives for clinical PICC venipuncture to get the attention of peers.
    METHODS: On 24 August 2022, a 58-year-old male was admitted to our department due to an intermittent cough persisting for over a month, which worsened 10 d prior. Imaging and laboratory investigations suggested the patient with pulmonary malignancy and SVCS. Chemotherapy was not an absolute contraindication in this patient. Lower extremity venipuncture is the preferred technique because administering upper extremity venous transfusion to patients with SVCS can exacerbate oedema in the head, neck, and upper extremities. The patient and his family were informed about the procedure, and informed consent was obtained. After successful puncture and prompt treatment, the patient was discharged, experiencing some relief from symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Inferior vena cava catheterisation is rare and important for cancer patients with SVCS, particularly in complex situations involving ectopic placement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:了解肿瘤患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)相关并发症的发生趋势,探讨并发症发生的危险因素及发生速度。
    方法:从2016年至2022年,在17家医院招募了3573例PICC患者。采用Logistic和COX回归分析PICC相关并发症的影响因素,分别。
    结果:症状性PICC相关性血栓形成的比例,静脉炎,报告的感染率从59.1%(2017年)下降,11.9%(2016年),和11.1%(2016年)至15.3%(2022年),2.9%(2022年),和7.4%(2022年),据报道,与粘合剂相关的皮肤损伤和出血/渗出从4.8%(2016年)和0.0%(2016年)增加到45.5%(2022年)和3.4%(2022年),分别。导管闭塞呈现先上升后下降趋势,从2.4(2016年)到12.0(2020年)到5.8%(2022年)。Logistic回归显示,医院水平,自然,病人的性别,年龄,诊断,深静脉置管的历史,化疗药物管理,PICC类型是并发症的影响因素。COX回归显示患者的性别,年龄,诊断,深静脉血栓形成和血栓性静脉炎的病史,深静脉置管的历史,化疗药物管理,PICC的类型,连接器类型,StatLock用于内固定是发病速度的影响因素。
    结论:近年来我国肿瘤患者PICC相关并发症的构成比发生了变化。化疗药物给药是加速并发症发生的重要危险因素。维护因素在COX模型上的权重最大,其次是患者因素。建议对有高危因素的患者进行严密监测,并进行适当的维护,以预防和延缓PICC相关并发症的发生。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the trends in the prevalence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related complications in cancer patients and explore the risk factors for complications and occurrence speed.
    METHODS: A total of 3573 cancer patients with PICC were recruited at 17 hospitals from 2016 to 2022. Logistic and COX regression were performed to identify influencing factors of PICC-related complications and incidence speed, respectively.
    RESULTS: The proportion of symptomatic PICC-related thrombosis, phlebitis, and infections reported had decreased from 59.1% (in 2017), 11.9% (in 2016), and 11.1% (in 2016) to 15.3% (in 2022), 2.9% (in 2022), and 7.4% (in 2022), and adhesive-related skin injuries and bleeding/oozing reported had increased from 4.8% (in 2016) and 0.0% (in 2016) to 45.5% (in 2022) and 3.4% (in 2022), respectively. Catheter occlusion showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing from 2.4 (in 2016) to 12.0 (in 2020) to 5.8% (in 2022). Logistic regression showed that hospital level, nature, the patient\'s gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, and type of PICC were influencing factors of complications. COX regression showed that the patient\'s gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein thrombosis and thrombophlebitis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, type of PICC, type of connector, and StatLock used for fixation were influencing factors of incidence speed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The composition ratios of PICC-related complications in cancer patients in China have changed in recent years. Chemotherapy drug administration was a significant risk factor accelerating the occurrence of complications. Maintenance factors had the maximum weight on the COX model, followed by patient factors. It is suggested that patients with high-risk factors be closely monitored and proper maintenance be performed to prevent and delay the occurrence of PICC-related complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究分析多学科协同延续护理联合心理护理干预在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者行外周中心静脉置管(PICC)中的应用效果。方法:疼痛数字评定量表(NPRS),焦虑自评量表(SAS),抑郁自评量表(SDS)和修订的Piper疲劳量表(PFS-R),自我护理能力量表(ESCA),生活质量核心问卷(QLQ-C30),PICC非计划性拔管的发生率,在前瞻性研究中比较两组患者导管相关并发症的总发生率和对护理的满意度。结果:观察组患者NPRS降低,SAS,SDS和PFS-R评分,PICC非计划拔管的总发生率和导管相关并发症的总发生率,护理满意率高于对照组。结论:多学科合作延续性护理联合心理护理干预可缓解MM患者疼痛。
    Objective: This study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of multidisciplinary cooperative continuous nursing combined with psychological nursing intervention in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Methods: The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Anxiety Self-Assessment Scale (SAS), Depression Self-Assessment Scale (SDS) and Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R), Self-Care Ability Scale (ESCA), Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), incidence of unplanned extubation of PICC, total incidence of catheter-related complications and satisfaction with nursing were compared between the two groups of patients in a prospective study. Results: Patients in the observation group had reduced NPRS, SAS, SDS and PFS-R scores, total incidence of unplanned extubation of PICC and the total incidence of catheter-related complications, and a higher nursing satisfaction rate in comparison to those in the control group. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary cooperative continuous nursing combined with psychological nursing interventions can relieve pain in MM patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号