mixed features

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在中国,迫切需要一种有用的量表来识别重度抑郁发作(MDE)患者的混合特征。本研究旨在评估中文版临床有用抑郁结果量表的信度和效度,并补充了针对MDE患者的DSM-5混合特征说明符(Chinese-CUDOS-M)的问题。
    共招募了152名MDE患者,并使用中国CUDOS-M进行了评估,患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和32项轻度躁狂检查表(HCL-32)。采用主成分分析(PCA)和探索性因子分析(EFA)。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)计算预测有效性。
    中国CUDOS-M的克朗巴赫α为0.85。PCA显示三个共同因子的特征值大于1;因子I的特征值为4.96,方差解释为38.1%。Chinese-CUDOS-M抑郁量表与PHQ-9相关(r=0.83,p<0.01),躁狂子量表与HCL-32相关(r=0.73,p<0.01)。中国-CUDOS-M对混合型抑郁症患者的AUROC为0.90(95CI:0.85-0.95),截断值为7,灵敏度为0.95,特异性为0.73。此外,重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的AUROC为0.88,截止值为7,灵敏度为0.96,特异性为0.71。双相情感障碍(BD)抑郁症患者的AUROC为0.92,截断值为9,灵敏度为0.89,特异性为0.87。
    我们的研究表明,中文-CUDOS-M可以识别MDD和BD抑郁症的混合特征,具有令人满意的信度和效度。
    A useful scale for identification of mixed features in major depressive episodes (MDE) patients is urgent in China. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale supplemented with questions for the DSM-5 mixed features specifier (Chinese-CUDOS-M) in MDE patients.
    A total of 152 MDE patients were recruited and assessed using Chinese-CUDOS-M, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32). Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted. The predictive validity was calculated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
    The Cronbach\'s alpha of Chinese-CUDOS-M was 0.85. PCA showed three common factors with eigenvalue greater than 1; the eigenvalue of factor I was 4.96, with 38.1% of variance explanation. Chinese-CUDOS-M depression subscale was associated with PHQ-9 (r = 0.83, p<0.01), and manic subscale was associated with HCL-32 (r = 0.73, p< 0.01). AUROC of the Chinese-CUDOS-M for patients with mixed depression was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.85-0.95), with a cut-off value of 7, sensitivity of 0.95, and specificity of 0.73. Furthermore, AUROC was 0.88 in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), with a cut-off value of 7, sensitivity of 0.96, and specificity of 0.71. AUROC was 0.92 in bipolar disorder (BD) depression patients, with a cut-off value of 9, sensitivity of 0.89, and specificity of 0.87.
    Our study shows that the Chinese-CUDOS-M can identify mixed features in both MDD and BD depression with satisfactory reliability and validity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨可靠性,有效性,临床有用的抑郁结果量表(CUDOS)在诊断为躁狂症的患者中筛查混合特征的可行性。
    共纳入109例躁狂发作患者。用Cronbachα和组内相关系数(ICC)分析了中文版CUDOS(CUDOS-C)的可靠性。通过比较CUDOS-C与患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)的相关性,采用Spearman相关系数进行效度分析。32项低躁狂清单(HCL-32)。混合特征的MINI(亚)躁狂发作评分-DSM-5模块-中文版(MINI-M-C)≥2被认为是混合特征的黄金标准,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析用于计算CUDOS-C评分的最佳截止值。
    CUDOS-C的Cronbachα值为0.898,CUDOS-C重测的ICC值为0.880(95%CI:0.812-0.923,p<.05)。CUDOS-C评分与PHQ-9评分显著相关(r=0.893,p=.000),但不与HCL-32评分(r=0.088,p=.364)。CUDOS-C识别躁狂症混合特征的ROC曲线下面积为0.909(95%CI:0.855至0.963,p<.001)。最佳临界值为11,灵敏度为0.854,特异性为0.868。CUDOS-C(评分≥12)确定40.4%的患者具有混合特征,高于临床医生诊断(18.3%)和使用MINI-M-C筛查(37.6%)。
    结果表明CUDOS-C是评估抑郁症状和筛查混合躁狂症患者的可靠且有效的自我管理问卷。
    This study aims to explore the reliability, validity, and feasibility of Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS) in screening mixed features in patients diagnosed with mania.
    A total of 109 patients with (hypo-) manic episode were recruited. The reliability of Chinese version of CUDOS (CUDOS-C) were analyzed with Cronbach\'s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the validity by comparing the correlation between CUDOS-C and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), 32-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32). The score of MINI (hypo-) manic episode with mixed features-DSM-5 Module-Chinese version(MINI-M-C) ≥ 2 was considered as the gold standard of mixed features, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of CUDOS-C score.
    The Cronbach\'s alpha value of CUDOS-C was 0.898, and the ICC of CUDOS-C test-retest was 0.880 (95% CI: 0.812-0.923, p < .05).The CUDOS-C score was significantly correlated with PHQ-9 score (r = 0.893, p = .000), but not with HCL-32 score(r = 0.088, p = .364).The area under ROC curve was 0.909 (95% CI: 0.855 to 0.963, p < .001) for CUDOS-C identifying mixed features in mania. The optimal cut-off value was 11 with a sensitivity of 0.854 and a specificity of 0.868. The CUDOS-C (score ≥ 12) identified 40.4% of the patients with mixed features, which was higher than those diagnosed by clinicians (18.3%) and screened using MINI-M-C (37.6%).
    The results indicate the CUDOS-C is a reliable and valid self-administered questionnaire for assessing depressive symptoms and screening patients with mixed mania.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    With the modification of DSM-5 mixed features specifier, a brief scale to screen mixed features in patients with mood disorders is needed in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale supplemented with DSM-5 Mixed subtype (CUDOS-M-C) for the Chinese patients with mood disorders.
    Overall, 300 patients with major depressive episode were recruited. All participants were assessed using CUDOS-M-C, Young Mania Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of CUDOS-M-C score. The reliability and validity of CUDOS-M-C were examined using Cronbach\'s alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and principal component analysis (PCA).
    The results of PCA indicated two-factor structure as the best solution for CUDOS-M-C, which explained 54.82% of cumulative variance. The Cronbach\'s alpha was 0.892 and the ICC was 0.853. The area under the ROC curve of the CUDOS-M-C for participants with mixed depression was 0.927 (p<0.001) and the suitable cut-off value was 8, with a sensitivity of 91.6% and specificity of 79.9%.
    Most of the patients were recruited from eastern China and further research with larger sample is warranted. And this study did not perform confirmatory factor analysis to identify the generalization of factor structure of CUDOS-M-C. Besides, the study performed the test-retest reliability of CUDOS-M-C and further analysis is needed to ascertain the patient\'s post-treatment changes.
    The CUDOS-M-C demonstrated to have satisfactory psychometric properties as a self-report scale, and could be applied to screen patients with mixed depression in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    蛋白质的热稳定性是酶工程过程中考虑的关键因素,找到一种能够鉴定嗜热和非嗜热蛋白的方法将有助于酶的设计。在这项研究中,我们建立了一种结合混合特征和机器学习的新方法来实现这一识别任务。在这种方法中,采用氨基酸还原方案对氨基酸序列进行重新编码。然后,物理化学特征,自交叉协方差(ACC),计算并整合减少的二肽以形成混合特征集,使用相关分析进行处理,特征选择,和主成分分析(PCA)来去除冗余信息。最后,4种机器学习方法和包含915种嗜热蛋白中的500个随机观察值和793种非嗜热蛋白中的500个随机样本的数据集用于训练和预测数据.实验结果表明,使用10倍交叉验证正确鉴定了98.2%的嗜热和非嗜热蛋白。此外,我们对最终保留特征和删除特征的分析产生了关于关键特征的信息,不重要和不敏感的元素,它还为酶设计提供了必要的信息。
    The thermostability of proteins is a key factor considered during enzyme engineering, and finding a method that can identify thermophilic and non-thermophilic proteins will be helpful for enzyme design. In this study, we established a novel method combining mixed features and machine learning to achieve this recognition task. In this method, an amino acid reduction scheme was adopted to recode the amino acid sequence. Then, the physicochemical characteristics, auto-cross covariance (ACC), and reduced dipeptides were calculated and integrated to form a mixed feature set, which was processed using correlation analysis, feature selection, and principal component analysis (PCA) to remove redundant information. Finally, four machine learning methods and a dataset containing 500 random observations out of 915 thermophilic proteins and 500 random samples out of 793 non-thermophilic proteins were used to train and predict the data. The experimental results showed that 98.2% of thermophilic and non-thermophilic proteins were correctly identified using 10-fold cross-validation. Moreover, our analysis of the final reserved features and removed features yielded information about the crucial, unimportant and insensitive elements, it also provided essential information for enzyme design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This post-hoc analysis assessed rates of symptomatic and functional remission, as well as recovery (combination of symptomatic and functional remission), in patients treated with lurasidone for major depressive disorder (MDD) associated with subthreshold hypomanic symptoms (mixed features).
    METHODS: Patients with MDD plus two or three manic symptoms (defined as per the DSM-5 mixed-features specifier) were randomly assigned to flexible-dose lurasidone 20-60 mg/day (n=109) or placebo (n=100) for 6 weeks, followed by a 3-month open-label, flexible-dose extension study for U.S. sites only (n=48). Cross-sectional recovery was defined as the presence of both symptomatic remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score ≤ 12) and functional remission (all Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] domain scores ≤3) at week 6, and at both months 1 and 3 of the extension study (\"sustained recovery\").
    RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of lurasidone-treated patients (31.3%) achieved recovery (assessed cross-sectionally) compared to placebo (12.2%, p=0.002) at week 6. The number of manic symptoms at baseline moderated the effect size for attaining cross-sectional recovery for lurasidone treatment (vs. placebo) (p=0.028). Sustained recovery rates were higher in patients initially treated with lurasidone (20.8%) versus placebo (12.5%).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc analysis of a placebo-controlled study with open-label extension that involved patients with MDD and mixed features, lurasidone was found to significantly improve the rate of recovery at 6 weeks (vs. placebo) that was sustained at month 3 of the extension study. The presence of two (as opposed to three) manic symptoms moderated recovery at the acute study endpoint.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号