metastatic uveal melanoma

转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤(mUM)患者预后不良,很少有适当的药物可用。Tebentafusp最近获得了美国食品和药物管理局的批准。然而,tebentafusp的真正疗效和安全性尚不清楚。我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆从成立到2024年3月20日。该研究是根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行报告的。我们使用随机效应模型来汇总tebentafusp治疗的缓解率和不良事件的数据。六项研究符合纳入标准,共589名参与者。汇总客观缓解率为0.08(95%CI:0.05-0.12),合并疾病控制率为0.51(95%CI:0.44-0.57)。任何级别不良事件的总发生率为0.99(95%CI:0.95-1.00),3-4级不良事件为0.50(95%CI:0.41-0.59),和0.01(95%CI:0-0.03)因不良事件而停药。Tebentafusp对mUM患者具有良好的治疗效果。尽管伴随着常见的不良事件发生,通常可以管理和控制。未来的研究对于证实这些发现和完善mUM管理指南是必要的。
    Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) have a poor prognosis, and few appropriate medications are available. Tebentafusp is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for mUM recently. However, the real efficacy and safety of tebentafusp are still unclear. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 20, 2024. The research was reported based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. We used random effects models to aggregate data on the response rates and adverse events of tebentafusp therapy. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample of 589 participants. The pooled objective response rate was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.05-0.12), and pooled disease control rate was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.44-0.57). The overall incidence was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00) for any grade adverse events, 0.50 (95% CI: 0.41-0.59) for grade 3-4 adverse events, and 0.01 (95% CI: 0-0.03) for discontinuation due to adverse events. Tebentafusp exhibits promising treatment outcomes for mUM patients. Although accompanied with a common occurrence of adverse events, which can typically be managed and controlled. Future research is necessary for substantiating these findings and refining guidelines for management of mUM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    FDA授予darovasertib孤儿药称号,一流的口语,小分子蛋白激酶C(PKC)抑制剂,用于治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤,2022年5月2日原发性葡萄膜黑色素瘤发展为转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的风险很高,预后不良。PKC和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶通路的激活在葡萄膜黑色素瘤的发病机理中起着至关重要的作用。和G蛋白亚基αq(GNAQ)的突变,G蛋白亚基α11(GNA11)基因被认为是葡萄膜黑色素瘤发展的早期事件。与其他PKC抑制剂相比,比如索特拉托林和恩扎托林,darovasertib在抑制常规(α,β)和新颖的(δ,实际上,η,θ)PKC蛋白,具有更好的耐受性和安全性。目前的I/II期临床试验表明,darovasertib,与丝裂原活化蛋白激酶/细胞外(MEK)抑制剂联合,比米替尼或克唑替尼,产生了葡萄膜黑色素瘤的协同作用。在这篇文章中,我们总结了治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的药物的发展,并讨论了与当前治疗相关的问题。我们还讨论了作用机制,药代动力学概况,不利影响,和darovasertib的临床试验,和未来治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤的研究方向。
    The FDA granted orphan drug designation to darovasertib, a first-in-class oral, small molecular inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC), for the treatment of uveal melanoma, on 2 May 2022. Primary uveal melanoma has a high risk of progressing to metastatic uveal melanoma, with a poor prognosis. The activation of the PKC and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways play an essential role in the pathogenesis of uveal melanoma, and mutations in the G protein subunit alpha q (GNAQ), and G protein subunit alpha11 (GNA11) genes are considered early events in the development of uveal melanoma. Compared to other PKC inhibitors, such as sotrastaurin and enzastaurin, darovasertib is significantly more potent in inhibiting conventional (α, β) and novel (δ, ϵ, η, θ) PKC proteins and has a better tolerability and safety profile. Current Phase I/II clinical trials indicated that darovasertib, combined with the Mitogen-activated protein kinase/Extracellular (MEK) inhibitors, binimetinib or crizotinib, produced a synergistic effect of uveal melanoma. In this article, we summarize the development of drugs for treating uveal melanomas and discuss problems associated with current treatments. We also discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic profile, adverse effects, and clinical trial for darovasertib, and future research directions for treating uveal melanoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    2022年1月25日,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准使用tebentafusp,双特异性糖蛋白100(gp100)肽-人类白细胞抗原(HLA)定向的CD3T细胞激活剂,用于治疗HLA-A*02:01阳性的不可切除或转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤(mUM)的成年患者。药效学数据表明tebentafusp靶向特定的HLA-A*02:01/gp100复合物,激活诱导肿瘤细胞死亡的CD4+/CD8+效应和记忆T细胞。Tebentafusp每天或每周通过静脉输注给予患者,取决于指示。III期试验记录了1年的总生存率为73%,总反应率为9%,无进展生存率为31%,疾病控制率为46%。报告的常见不良事件是细胞因子释放综合征,皮疹,发热,瘙痒,疲劳,恶心,发冷,腹痛,水肿,低血压,皮肤干燥,头痛和呕吐。与其他类型的黑色素瘤相比,MUM表现出明显的基因突变,当使用传统的黑色素瘤治疗时,其表型导致有限的生存功效。对mUM的低电流治疗功效,除了不良的长期预后和高死亡率,优先批准tebentafusp在其临床影响方面具有开创性。这篇综述将讨论药效学和药代动力学概况,以及用于评估tebentafusp安全性和有效性的临床试验。
    On January 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of tebentafusp, a bispecific glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-directed CD3 T-cell activator, for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Pharmacodynamic data indicate that tebentafusp targets a specific HLA-A*02:01/gp100 complex, activating both CD4+/CD8+ effector and memory T cells that induce tumor cell death. Tebentafusp is administered to patients via intravenous infusion daily or weekly, depending on the indication. Phase III trials have documented a 1-year overall survival of 73%, overall response rate of 9%, progression-free survival of 31% and disease control rate of 46%. Common adverse events reported are cytokine release syndrome, rash, pyrexia, pruritus, fatigue, nausea, chills, abdominal pain, edema, hypotension, dry skin, headache and vomiting. Compared to other types of melanomas, mUM presents with a distinct profile of genetic mutations, which phenotypically results in limited survival efficacy when using traditional melanoma treatments. The low current treatment efficacy for mUM, alongside a poor long-term prognosis and high mortality rates, gives precedence for the approval of tebentafusp to be groundbreaking in its clinical impact. This review will discuss the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile, and the clinical trials used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tebentafusp.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Uveal melanoma (UVM) is an adult intraocular malignancy which is the most frequent and has a high tendency for metastasis. This study aims to develop significant differential gene subnetwork between primary and metastatic UVM to identify potential prognostic biomarkers. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among three chip datasets were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus and identified according to standardization annotation information. Genetic enrichment analyses were utilized to describe biologic functions. The protein-protein interaction network of DEGs was developed and the module analysis was constructed by STRING and Cytoscape. Kaplan-Meier method of the integrated expression score was applied to analyze survival outcomes. Functional annotation was assessed to perform GO and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis. In addition, ClueGO and gene set enrichment analysis were analyzed to detect underlying significant genes and involved signaling pathways. A total of 103 DEGs with function enrichment were recognized and might be considered as candidate prognostic biomarkers between primary and metastatic UVM. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier method suggested that SCD5, SPTBN1, FABP5, SQLE, PTPLA (HACD1), and CDC25B were independent prognostic factors in UVM. Functional annotations indicated that the most involved significant pathways including interferon-gamma response, IL-6 JAK STAT3 signaling, TNFA signaling via NFKB and inflammatory response. Significant DEGs between primary and metastatic UVM tissue were identified and might have involved in the metastasis of UVM. SCD5, SPTBN1, FABP5, SQLE, PTPLA (HACD1), and CDC25B transcription levels were of high prognostic value, which might assist us to understand the underlying carcinogenesis or advancement of UVM better.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号