healthcare disparities

医疗保健差异
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国的计划生育政策经历了独生子女政策阶段,部分二胎政策,和普遍的二胎政策。然而,这些政策变化对妇女和儿童获得妇幼保健(MCH)服务的空间可及性的影响仍然不确定。这项研究旨在评估在二胎政策背景下对MCH服务的空间可达性的时空趋势和地理差异。
    方法:本研究在南宁市进行,中国,从2013年到2019年。交通网络上的数据,妇幼保健机构,每年的新生儿数量,收集了南宁市每年的孕妇人数。采用高斯两步浮动集水区(Ga2SFCA)方法来测量县对MCH服务的空间可达性,乡镇,和村庄层面。使用Joinpoint回归分析分析了空间可达性的时间趋势。使用地理信息系统(GIS)制图技术确定了空间可达性的地理差异。
    结果:总体而言,2013年至2019年,县级妇幼保健服务的空间可达性呈上升趋势,镇,和村庄层面,年平均百分比变化(AAPC)分别为5.04、4.73和5.39。具体来说,在父母双方独生子女的部分二胎政策期间,空间可达性经历了轻微的下降趋势(即,2013-2014),在父母一方独生子女的部分二胎政策期间略有上升趋势(即,2014-2016)和普遍二胎政策的早期阶段(即,2016-2018),以及普遍二胎政策后期的大幅上升趋势(即,2018-2019年)。从中心城区到周边农村,妇幼保健服务的空间可达性逐渐下降。空间可达性低的地区主要位于偏远的农村地区。
    结论:随着二胎政策的逐步开放,妇女和儿童获得妇幼保健服务的空间可及性总体上有所改善。然而,在二胎政策的整个阶段,显著的地理差异一直存在。应考虑采取综合措施,提高妇幼保健服务对妇女和儿童的公平性。
    BACKGROUND: China\'s family planning policies have experienced stages of one-child policy, partial two-child policy, and universal two-child policy. However, the impact of these policy shifts on the spatial accessibility to maternal and child health (MCH) services for women and children remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the spatiotemporal trends and geographic disparities in spatial accessibility to MCH services in the context of two-child polices.
    METHODS: This study was conducted in Nanning prefecture, China, from 2013 to 2019. Data on the transportation networks, MCH institutes, the annual number of newborns, and the annual number of pregnant women in Nanning prefecture were collected. Gaussian two-step floating catchment area (Ga2SFCA) method was employed to measure the spatial accessibility to MCH services at county, township, and village levels. Temporal trends in spatial accessibility were analyzed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Geographic disparities in spatial accessibility were identified using geographic information system (GIS) mapping techniques.
    RESULTS: Overall, the spatial accessibility to MCH services showed an upward trend from 2013 to 2019 at county, town, and village levels, with the average annual percent change (AAPC) being 5.04, 4.73, and 5.39, respectively. Specifically, the spatial accessibility experienced a slight downward trend during the period of partial two-child policy for both parents only children (i.e., 2013-2014), a slight upward trend during the period of partial two-child policy for either parent only child (i.e., 2014-2016) and the early stages of universal two-child policy (i.e., 2016-2018), and a large upward trend in the later stages of universal two-child policy (i.e., 2018-2019). Spatial accessibility to MCH services gradually decreased from central urban areas to surrounding rural areas. Regions with low spatial accessibility were predominantly located in remote rural areas.
    CONCLUSIONS: With the gradual opening of the two-child policies, the spatial accessibility to MCH services for women and children has generally improved. However, significant geographic disparities have persisted throughout the stages of the two-child policies. Comprehensive measures should be considered to improve equity in MCH services for women and children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:边缘化的贫困人口,以贫困和社会排斥为特征,不成比例地遭受乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染,并在获得医疗保健方面遇到巨大的差距。这进一步加剧了全球HBV负担,阻碍了HBV消除的进展。这种混合方法的系统评价旨在综合他们的利用和HBV医疗保健服务的影响因素,包括筛查,疫苗接种,治疗,和与护理的联系。
    方法:从成立到2023年5月4日检索了11个数据库。包括定量和定性研究,研究了影响边缘化贫困人口中HBV医疗保健的因素。进行了荟萃分析,以综合HBV医疗保健利用率的汇总率。使用健康差异研究框架对影响利用率的因素进行了整合和可视化。
    结果:纳入了21项研究,涉及13,171名边缘化穷人:性工作者,农民工,非正常移民,无家可归的成年人,和弱势群体。他们对HBV医疗保健的利用率从1.5%到27.5%不等。荟萃分析表明,至少一剂HBV疫苗的合并率几乎没有达到37%(95%置信区间:0.26-0.49)。确定了51个影响因素,社会文化因素(n=19)是最常见的报道,其次是行为因素(n=14)和医疗系统因素(n=11)。社会文化障碍包括移民身份,监狱历史,非法工作,和HBV歧视。行为领域因素,包括以前的性传播疾病检测,住宅药物治疗,和解决问题的应对,促进HBV医疗保健访问,而敌意应对施加了负面影响。医疗保健系统促进者包括HBV健康素养,信仰,和医生的建议,而障碍包括服务不可用和保险不足。生物和物理/建筑环境是研究最少的领域,强调地理流动性,避难所容量,和获得人道主义保健中心影响乙肝病毒的医疗保健为边缘化的贫困人口。
    结论:边缘化的贫困人口在获得HBV医疗保健方面遇到实质性差异,强调需要采取协同管理方法,包括部署健康教育举措来揭穿HBV误解,开发持续跟踪的综合HBV管理系统,开展量身定制的社区外展计划,并建立一个基于人权的政策框架,以保证边缘化的贫困人口不受限制地获得基本的HBV服务。
    BACKGROUND: Marginalised poor populations, characterised by poverty and social exclusion, suffer disproportionately from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections and encounter substantial disparities in access to healthcare. This has further exacerbated the global HBV burden and precluded progress towards HBV elimination. This mixed-method systematic review aimed to synthesise their utilisation and influencing factors in HBV healthcare services, including screening, vaccination, treatment, and linkage-to-care.
    METHODS: Eleven databases were searched from their inception to May 4, 2023. Quantitative and qualitative studies examining the factors influencing HBV healthcare access among marginalised poor populations were included. A meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise the pooled rates of HBV healthcare utilisation. The factors influencing utilisation were integrated and visualised using a health disparity research framework.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included involving 13,171 marginalised poor individuals: sex workers, rural migrant workers, irregular immigrants, homeless adults, and underprivileged individuals. Their utilisation of HBV healthcare ranged from 1.5% to 27.5%. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled rate of at least one dose of the HBV vaccine barely reached 37% (95% confidence interval: 0.26‒0.49). Fifty-one influencing factors were identified, with sociocultural factors (n = 19) being the most frequently reported, followed by behavioural (n = 14) and healthcare system factors (n = 11). Socio-cultural barriers included immigration status, prison history, illegal work, and HBV discrimination. Behavioural domain factors, including previous testing for sexually transmitted diseases, residential drug treatment, and problem-solving coping, facilitated HBV healthcare access, whereas hostility coping exerted negative influences. Healthcare system facilitators comprised HBV health literacy, beliefs, and physician recommendations, whereas barriers included service inaccessibility and insurance inadequacies. The biological and physical/built environments were the least studied domains, highlighting that geographical mobility, shelter capacity, and access to humanitarian health centres affect HBV healthcare for marginalised poor populations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Marginalised poor populations encounter substantial disparities in accessing HBV healthcare, highlighting the need for a synergistic management approach, including deploying health education initiatives to debunk HBV misperceptions, developing integrated HBV management systems for continuous tracking, conducting tailored community outreach programmes, and establishing a human rights-based policy framework to guarantee the unfettered access of marginalised poor populations to essential HBV services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是对收入不平等对老年人医疗服务利用的具体影响有更细致的了解。此外,该研究旨在阐明在这种情况下,公共转移收入和心理健康的调节和中介作用。
    通过在三个主要地理区域(西部,中央,和东方)。分析采用基线回归,以及中介和调节效应测试。
    首先,收入不平等与老年人使用治疗性医疗保健服务(β1=-0.484,P<0.01)和预防性医疗保健服务(β2=-0.576,P<0.01)之间存在负相关关系。这种关系在中低收入群体以及西部地区更为明显。心理状态的中介效应显著(β3=-0.331,P<0.05,β4=-0.331,P<0.05)。公共转移收入具有重要的调节作用。公共转移收入对治疗服务的调节作用在低收入人群中更为显著(β5=0.821,P<0.01)。公共转移收入对预防服务的调节作用在中等收入人群中更为显著(β6=0.833,P<0.01)。
    该研究清楚地表明,收入不平等与老年人对医疗保健服务的利用之间存在显着负相关。此外,研究表明,这种关系在中低收入和西部地区的老年人中尤为明显.这种对区域和收入水平异质性的详细分析在这一研究领域具有特别的价值。其次,本研究首次尝试整合公共转移收入和心理状态两个关键维度,阐明他们在这种关系中的调节和调解作用。研究结果表明,公共转移收入是一个调节因素,对收入不平等产生显著的“重新排序效应”,并导致“剥夺效应”。\"这些因素可能会阻碍医疗服务的利用,可能影响老年人的心理状态。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study is to gain a more nuanced understanding of the specific impact of income inequality on the utilization of healthcare services for older adults. Additionally, the study aims to elucidate the moderating and mediating roles of public transfer income and psychological health in this context.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic examination of the impact of income inequality on healthcare utilization among older adults was conducted through field questionnaire surveys in six cities across three major geographical regions (West, Central, and East). The analysis employed baseline regression, as well as mediating and moderating effect tests.
    UNASSIGNED: First, there is a negative relationship between income inequality and the use of therapeutic healthcare services (β1 = -0.484, P < 0.01) and preventive healthcare services (β2 = -0.576, P < 0.01) by older adults. This relationship is more pronounced in the low- and medium-income groups as well as in the western region. The mediating effect of psychological state is significant (β3 = -0.331, P < 0.05, β4 = -0.331, P < 0.05). Public transfer income plays a significant role in regulation. The moderating effect of public transfer income on therapeutic services was more significant in low-income groups (β5 = 0.821, P < 0.01). The moderating effect of public transfer income on preventive services was more significant in middle-income groups (β6 = 0.833, P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: The study clearly demonstrates a significant negative correlation between income inequality and the utilization of healthcare services by older adults. Furthermore, the study reveals that this relationship is particularly pronounced among older adults in low- and medium-income and Western regions. This detailed analysis of regional and income level heterogeneity is of particular value in this field of research. Secondly, this study attempts to integrate the two pivotal dimensions of public transfer income and psychological state for the first time, elucidating their moderating and mediating roles in this relationship. The findings indicate that public transfer income serves as a moderating factor, exerting a notable \"reordering effect\" on income inequality and resulting in a \"deprivation effect.\" Such factors may impede the utilization of medical services, potentially influencing the psychological state of older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据社会经济地位的不同,空气污染对居民健康的影响程度不同。然而,关于空气污染是否会导致不公平的健康成本的研究一直缺乏。
    方法:在这项研究中,中国劳动力动态调查的数据与PM2.5平均浓度和降水量的数据相匹配,用计量经济学方法分析了空气污染对居民健康支出的影响,包括一个两部分模型,仪器变量和调节作用。
    结果:研究结果表明,空气污染显著影响中国居民的健康成本,并导致低收入人群面临健康不平等。特别是,经验证据表明,空气污染对居民健康费用的可能性没有显著影响(β=0.021,p=0.770),但它增加了居民门诊总费用(β=0.379,p<0.006),报销门诊费用(β=0.453,p<0.044)和自付门诊费用(β=0.362,p<0.048)。收入的异质性分析表明,由于空气污染导致的健康成本膨胀,低收入人群面临着不平等,随着PM2.5的增加,他们的总费用和自付门诊费用显着增加(β=0.417,p=0.013;β=0.491,p=0.020)。进一步分析发现,社会基本医疗保险对空气污染对个体健康膨胀的影响没有显著的正向调节作用(β=0.021,p=0.292)。但职工补充医疗保险可以降低空气污染对低收入居民报销和自付门诊费用的影响(β=-1.331,p=0.096;β=-2.211,p=0.014)。
    结论:该研究得出结论,空气污染增加了中国居民的门诊费用,对门诊费用的发生率没有显著影响。然而,空气污染对低收入居民的影响大于对高收入居民的影响,这表明空气污染导致医疗费用的不公平。此外,补充医疗保险减少了低收入员工因空气污染造成的医疗费用不平等。
    BACKGROUND: Air pollution affects residents\' health to varying extents according to differences in socioeconomic status. However, there has been a lack of research on whether air pollution contributes to unfair health costs.
    METHODS: In this research, data from the China Labour Force Dynamics Survey are matched with data on PM2.5 average concentration and precipitation, and the influence of air pollution on the health expenditures of residents is analysed with econometric methods involving a two-part model, instrument variables and moderating effects.
    RESULTS: The findings reveal that air pollution significantly impacts Chinese residents\' health costs and leads to low-income people face health inequality. Specifcally, the empirical evidence shows that air pollution has no significant influence on the probability of residents\' health costs (β = 0.021, p = 0.770) but that it increases the amount of residents\' total outpatient costs (β = 0.379, p < 0.006), reimbursed outpatient cost (β = 0.453, p < 0.044) and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (β = 0.362, p < 0.048). The heterogeneity analysis of income indicates that low-income people face inequality due to health cost inflation caused by air pollution, their total and out-of-pocket outpatient cost significantly increase with PM2.5 (β = 0.417, p = 0.013; β = 0.491, p = 0.020). Further analysis reveals that social basic medical insurance does not have a remarkable positive moderating effect on the influence of air pollution on individual health inflation (β = 0.021, p = 0.292), but supplementary medical insurance for employees could reduce the effect of air pollution on low-income residents\' reimbursed and out-of-pocket outpatient cost (β=-1.331, p = 0.096; β=-2.211, p = 0.014).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that air pollution increases the amount of Chinese residents\' outpatient cost and has no significant effect on the incidence of outpatient cost. However, air pollution has more significant impact on the low-income residents than the high-income residents, which indicates that air pollution leads to the inequity of medical cost. Additionally, the supplementary medical insurance reduces the inequity of medical cost caused by air pollution for the low-income employees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    城市萎缩引发的公共资源公平性是一个全球性挑战。重要的是,城市萎缩对卫生服务资源配置的影响需要更好地理解。本研究探讨了人口变化对收缩城市的政府投资和卫生服务提供的影响。
    使用中国城市统计年鉴(2010-2020)的数据,我们采用回归不连续(RD)和固定效应模型来检验城市萎缩与卫生服务提供之间的因果关系.
    缩小的城市在卫生资源方面显示出巨大的差异,特别是床数(-1,167.58,p<0.05)和医生可用性(-538.54,p<0.05)。经济发展(p<0.01)和财政自主权(p<0.01)影响医院病床分布。对公共服务的投资(小学和教师,p<0.01)影响卫生资源提供。稳健性测试支持我们的结果。
    这项研究揭示了城市萎缩如何扰乱医疗服务的提供和公平,建立城市收缩/扩张与卫生资源配置之间的因果关系,强调城市人口变化造成的不平衡。城市扩张加剧了对卫生资源的争夺,而不断缩小的城市由于政府的不情愿而难以提供足够的资源。政策制定者应调整卫生资源分配策略,以满足不断变化的城市景观中的患者需求。
    UNASSIGNED: The equity of public resources triggered by city shrinkage is a global challenge. Significantly, the impact of city shrinkage on the allocation of health service resources needs to be better understood. This study explores the impact of population change on government investment and health service delivery in shrinking cities.
    UNASSIGNED: Using data from China\'s Urban Statistical Yearbook (2010-2020), we employ regression discontinuity (RD) and fixed-effect models to examine the causal relationship between city shrinkage and health service provision.
    UNASSIGNED: Shrinking cities show significant disparities in health resources, particularly in bed numbers (-1,167.58, p < 0.05) and doctor availability (-538.54, p < 0.05). Economic development (p < 0.01) and financial autonomy (p < 0.01) influence hospital bed distribution. Investments in public services (primary schools and teachers, p < 0.01) affect health resource delivery. Robustness tests support our results.
    UNASSIGNED: This study reveals how city shrinkage disrupts health service provision and equity, establishing a causal relationship between city shrinkage/expansion and health resource allocation, emphasizing the imbalance caused by urban population changes. City expansion intensifies competition for health resources, while shrinking cities struggle to provide adequate resources due to government reluctance. Policymakers should adapt health resource allocation strategies to meet patient demands in changing urban landscapes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康医疗扶贫计划是中国有针对性的消除贫困战略的一部分,其目的是保护穷人的健康权,防止他们因病陷入或返贫。这个程序中定义了许多任务,包括提高医疗保险水平,提供一个分诊系统,改善医疗卫生服务,增强人们的健康。这一举措的一个关键方面是公平分配卫生资源,一项旨在加强医疗卫生服务的关键措施。本研究旨在分析和比较该计划实施后西北地区不同县的卫生资源配置。
    方法:基尼系数量化了分配平等的水平,泰尔指数评估了不平等的根源,卫生资源集聚度衡量卫生资源的可及性。
    结果:1)西北地区各县之间基于人口(基尼系数<0.45)的卫生资源分配比基于面积(基尼系数>0.35)的分配更为公平。2)非贫困县的贡献率高于贫困县,这意味着非贫困县内部的不平等。3)非贫困县按地区划分的医疗机构床位分配要好于贫困县,非贫困县居民获得卫生服务的机会优于贫困县。
    结论:西北五省之间的卫生资源配置分析显示,西北五省之间的公平性存在显着差异,差异主要来自非贫困县。虽然平等正在逐步改善,贫困县的卫生资源数量仍然低于非贫困县。随后,必须确保医疗资源的公平分配,同时考虑到医疗资源的利用率和质量。
    BACKGROUND: The Health and Medical Assistance Program for Poverty Alleviation is part of China\'s targeted poverty elimination strategy, which aims to protect poor people\'s right to health and prevent them from becoming trapped in or returning to poverty because of illness. Many tasks have been defined in this program, including raising the medical insurance level, providing a triage system, improving medical and health services, and enhancing people\'s health. One pivotal aspect of this initiative involves equitable health resource allocation, a key measure aimed at bolstering medical and health services. This study aimed to analyze and compare health resource allocations in different counties in Northwest China after the implementation of the program.
    METHODS: The Gini coefficient quantifies the level of distributional equality, the Theil index assesses the sources of inequality, and the Health Resource Agglomeration Degree gauges the accessibility of health resources.
    RESULTS: 1) The health resource allocation distributed based on population(Gini Coefficient < 0.45) was more equitable than that distributed based on area(Gini Coefficient > 0.35) among counties in Northwest China. 2) The contribution rate within non-impoverished counties is higher than that of impoverished counties, which means the inequality within non-impoverished counties. 3) The allocation of beds in medical institutions by area in non-impoverished counties was better than that in impoverished counties, and accessibility to health services for residents in non-impoverished counties was better than that in impoverished counties.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of health resource allocation among the five provinces in Northwest China revealed significant differences in equality among the five provinces in Northwest China, and the differences were mainly derived from the non-impoverished counties. Although the equality is gradually improving, the number of health resources in impoverished counties remain lower than that in non-impoverished counties.Subsequently, it is essential to ensure equitable distribution of healthcare resources while also taking into account their utilization and quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:疫苗接种在预防COVID-19感染和降低疾病严重程度方面发挥着重要作用。城市和农村地区的疫苗接种率通常存在差异。衡量这些差异有助于制定更加协调和可持续的解决方案。这些信息也可作为未来预防和控制新发传染病的参考。
    目的:本研究旨在评估当前中国居民COVID-19(第二次加强)疫苗接种率和影响因素,以及中国城乡之间的差距。
    方法:这项横断面研究采用分层随机抽样方法,从东部(常州)的11个社区和10个村庄中选择代表性样本,中部(郑州),西部(西宁),和东北(牡丹江)中国大陆,2023年2月1日至2月18日。问卷是由经验丰富的流行病学家开发的,包含以下内容:社会人口统计信息,健康状况,疫苗相关信息,与保护动机理论(PMT)相关的信息,以及对医疗保健系统的信任程度。根据提供的自我报告信息评估参与者的疫苗接种率。采用二元logistic回归模型探讨城乡人群疫苗接种的影响因素。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)评估了疫苗接种率的城乡差异。
    结果:共纳入5780名参与者,53.04%(3066/5780)为女性。总样本的疫苗接种率为12.18%(704/5780;95%CI11.34-13.02),农村参与者中13.76%(341/2478;95%CI12.40-15.12),城市参与者中的10.99%(363/3302;95%CI9.93-12.06)。对于农村参与者来说,自我报告的健康状况,自我效能感,教育水平,疫苗知识,易感性,好处,对卫生保健系统的信任是影响接种的独立因素(均P<0.05)。对于城市参与者来说,慢性疾病,COVID-19感染,主观社区水平,疫苗知识,自我效能感,对卫生保健系统的信任是影响接种的独立因素(均P<0.05)。PSM分析发现,城乡参与者的疫苗接种率差异为3.42%。
    结论:中国人群中第四次COVID-19疫苗接种率(第二次加强)极低,显著低于以往的疫苗覆盖率。鉴于COVID-19感染仍然处于低水平,应着力提高自我效能,以扩大中国人群的疫苗覆盖率。对于农村居民来说,建立对疫苗的益处的认识和改善他们的整体健康状况应优先考虑。在城市地区,更大比例的COVID-19患者和慢性病患者应该接种疫苗。
    BACKGROUND: Vaccination plays an important role in preventing COVID-19 infection and reducing the severity of the disease. There are usually differences in vaccination rates between urban and rural areas. Measuring these differences can aid in developing more coordinated and sustainable solutions. This information also serves as a reference for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases in the future.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current coverage rate and influencing factors of COVID-19 (second booster) vaccination among Chinese residents, as well as the disparities between urban and rural areas in China.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a stratified random sampling approach to select representative samples from 11 communities and 10 villages in eastern (Changzhou), central (Zhengzhou), western (Xining), and northeast (Mudanjiang) Mainland China from February 1 to February 18, 2023. The questionnaires were developed by experienced epidemiologists and contained the following: sociodemographic information, health conditions, vaccine-related information, information related to the Protective Motivation Theory (PMT), and the level of trust in the health care system. Vaccination rates among the participants were evaluated based on self-reported information provided. Binary logistic regression models were performed to explore influencing factors of vaccination among urban and rural participants. Urban-rural disparities in the vaccination rate were assessed using propensity score matching (PSM).
    RESULTS: A total of 5780 participants were included, with 53.04% (3066/5780) being female. The vaccination rate was 12.18% (704/5780; 95% CI 11.34-13.02) in the total sample, 13.76% (341/2478; 95% CI 12.40-15.12) among the rural participants, and 10.99% (363/3302; 95% CI 9.93-12.06) among the urban participants. For rural participants, self-reported health condition, self-efficacy, educational level, vaccine knowledge, susceptibility, benefits, and trust in the health care system were independent factors associated with vaccination (all P<.05). For urban participants, chronic conditions, COVID-19 infection, subjective community level, vaccine knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust in the health care system were independent factors associated with vaccination (all P<.05). PSM analysis uncovered a 3.42% difference in vaccination rates between urban and rural participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: The fourth COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate (second booster) among the Chinese population was extremely low, significantly lower than the previous vaccine coverage rate. Given that COVID-19 infection is still prevalent at low levels, efforts should focus on enhancing self-efficacy to expand the vaccine coverage rate among the Chinese population. For rural residents, building awareness of the vaccine\'s benefits and improving their overall health status should be prioritized. In urban areas, a larger proportion of people with COVID-19 and patients with chronic illness should be vaccinated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卵巢癌(OC)诊断的研究,亚洲亚族裔群体的治疗和生存率很少。很少有研究还对亚洲群体内部和跨亚洲群体的这些结果进行了趋势分析。
    使用物流,考克斯,和2000-2018年监测的Joinpoint回归分析,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)数据,我们检查了OC晚期诊断的差异和趋势,7个亚洲亚族裔群体接受治疗和5年病因特异性生存率。
    七个亚裔人群中有6491名OC患者(平均[SD]年龄,57.29[13.90]年)。有1583(24.39%)菲律宾人,1183(18.23%)中国人,和761(11.72%)亚裔印度或巴基斯坦(AIP)患者。大多数(52.49%)被诊断为晚期OC。AIP比其他亚组更可能有晚期诊断(ORs,95CIs:0.77,0.62-0.96[菲律宾语];0.76,0.60-0.95[中文];0.71,0.54-0.94[日文];0.74,0.56-0.98[越南语]和0.66,0.53-0.83[其他亚洲人])。菲律宾人最不可能接受手术,但最有可能接受化疗。日本患者的5年OC病因特异性生存率最差(50.29%,95CI:46.20%-54.74%)。根据汇总的分析,晚期诊断有显著下降趋势,接受化疗有增加趋势.几种次生的OC结果趋势与汇总分析中观察到的趋势不同。
    在这项6491名患者的队列研究中,OC诊断,治疗,生存,亚裔美国人亚裔群体的趋势不同。在未来的研究和干预措施中必须考虑这些差异,以确保所有亚裔美国人都能从OC护理和控制的进步中平等受益。
    UNASSIGNED: Studies on ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis, treatment and survival across disaggregated Asian sub-ethnic groups are sparse. Few studies have also conducted trend analyses of these outcomes within and across Asian groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Using logistic, Cox, and Joinpoint regression analyses of the 2000-2018 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we examined disparities and trends in OC advanced stage diagnosis, receipt of treatments and the 5-year cause-specific survival across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 6491 OC patients across seven Asian sub-ethnic groups (mean [SD] age, 57.29 [13.90] years). There were 1583(24.39%) Filipino, 1183(18.23%) Chinese, and 761(11.72%) Asian Indian or Pakistani (AIP) patients. The majority (52.49%) were diagnosed with OC with at an advanced stage. AIP were more likely to have advanced stage diagnosis than other subgroups (ORs, 95%CIs: 0.77, 0.62-0.96 [Filipino]; 0.76, 0.60-0.95 [Chinese]; 0.71, 0.54-0.94 [Japanese]; 0.74, 0.56-0.98 [Vietnamese] and 0.66, 0.53-0.83 [Other Asians]). The Filipinos were least likely to receive surgery but most likely to undergo chemotherapy. Japanese patients had the worst 5-year OC cause-specific survival (50.29%, 95%CI: 46.20%-54.74%). Based on the aggregated analyses, there was a significantly decreased trend in advanced-stage diagnosis and an increased trend in receipt of chemotherapy. Trends in OC outcomes for several subethnicities differed from those observed in aggregated analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cohort study of 6491 patients, OC diagnosis, treatment, survival, and trends differed across Asian American ethnic subgroups. Such differences must be considered in future research and interventions to ensure all Asian American subethnicities equally benefit from the advancements in OC care and control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号