Dysregulation of angiogenesis is associated with tumor development and is accompanied by altered expression of pro-angiogenic factors. EGFL7 is a newly identified antigenic factor that plays a role in various cancers such as breast cancer, lung cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia. We have recently found that EGFL7 is expressed in the bone microenvironment, but its role in giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) and osteosarcoma (OS) is unknown. The aims of this study are to examine the gene expression profile of EGFL7 in GCTB and OS and compare with that of VEGF-A-D and TNFSF11 using single-cell RNA sequencing data. In-depth differential expression analyses were employed to characterize their expression in the constituent cell types of GCTB and OS. Notably, EGFL7 in GCTB was expressed at highest levels in the endothelial cell (EC) cluster followed by osteoblasts, myeloid cells, and chondrocytes, respectively. In OS, EGFL7 exhibited highest expression in EC cell cluster followed by osteoblastic OS cells, myeloid cells 1, and carcinoma associated fibroblasts (CAFs), respectively. In comparison, VEGF-A is expressed at highest levels in myeloid cells followed by OCs in GCTB, and in myeloid cells, and OCs in OS. VEGF-B is expressed at highest levels in chondrocytes in GCTB and in OCs in OS. VEGF-C is strongly enriched in ECs and VEGF-D is expressed at weak levels in all cell types in both GCTB and OS. TNFSF11 (or RANKL) shows high expression in CAFs and osteoblastic OS cells in OS, and osteoblasts in GCTB. This study investigates pro-angiogenic genes in GCTB and OS and suggests that these genes and their expression patterns are cell-type specific and could provide potential prognostic biomarkers and cell type target treatment for GCTB and OS.

OBJECTIVE: Whether H3.3 K36M mutation (H3K36M) could be an approach if the diagnosis of chondroblastoma (CB) patients was indistinct and it was suspected to be unclear clinically.
METHODS: We reviewed and compared our clinical experiences of CB cases and some suspected cases, which were not diagnosed distinctly, between 2013 to 2019. A total of 15 male and four female cases included in this study were seperated into two groups, CB group and suspected case (SC) group. The CB group included 13 men and 3 women, with an age range from 9 to 54 (mean age, 22 years old). The SC group included two men and one woman, with the age range from 13 to 25 (mean age, 19 years old). In both groups the patients had been followed-up until December 2019 and none of the patients had prior treatment history. We evaluated the clinical complaints, radiological features, and clinical-histological features of the cases and performed an immunohistochemical (IHC) study to detect whether the H3K36M expression of cases was different, consistent with a gene-mutation analysis.
RESULTS: In both groups, the radiologic features of both groups appeared as round low-density shadow with a clear edge, pathologic features showed diffuse proliferation of neoplastic cells with multinuclear giant cells. The radiological tumor size of CB group and SC group showed little difference, which was about 29.0*21.6 mm. Clinical-immunohistochemical features of both groups showed chondroid matrix inside with naïve tumor cells, multinucleated giant cells, and ground substance cells. Most of them showed chondro-related antibody positive (12 cases) but some of them showed S-100 negative (four cases). The clear difference of both groups was the result of H3K36M IHC study and gene analysis. In our cases, the CB group showed diffuse H3K36M positive and the SC group showed negative. The gene mutation analysis revealed that H3K36M-positive CB patients had K36M mutation, which were not found in the SC group. Sanger sequencing showed an A > T substitution at codon 36 of histone H3F3B. No other types of histone H3 mutation was detected in the CB group. Particularly, one of the suspected cases showed a G34W mutation was confirmed to be a giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed H3K36M immunohistochemistry and gene mutation analysis were specific clinical diagnostic tools to distinguish suspected CB from other giant cell-rich or cartilage matrix-diffuse bone tumors. The clinical-radiological and histomorphological features of patients gave suggestions on whether the H3K36M IHC and gene analysis should be required.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effect of preoperative denosumab on the local recurrence of giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) treated with curettage. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. The following data were analyzed using meta-analysis: local recurrence rate of patients receiving denosumab followed by curettage (denosumab group), local recurrence rate of patients receiving curettage only (control group), and a comparison of the local recurrence rates of the two groups. Results: Nine studies that contained 672 patients with GCTB were included in this review. Patients in the denosumab group (preoperative denosumab followed by curettage) had a higher risk of local recurrence compared with those in the control group (curettage only) (odds ratio = 3.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.48-6.22, P < 0.01). The association between preoperative denosumab and local recurrence remained significant in most of the subgroup analyses, except for those with sample sizes < 59 (P = 0.09), sacral GCTB (P = 0.42), and usage of postoperative denosumab (P = 0.38). Conclusions: Preoperative denosumab may increase the risk of local recurrence of GCTB treated with curettage and should be used with caution in the management of GCTB.

Retrospective analysis of the long-term clinical outcome and acute toxicity of the primary malignant tumor of cervical spine receiving CBCT image-guided VMAT.
Thirty patients with primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine included in our center, from December 2013 to January 2016, 28 patients were retrospectively studied. The prescription dosage 95% PTV volume dose was 44 Gy, 2.0 Gy/fraction, and a total of 22 times. The median PGTV synchronized volume dose was 60 Gy (45-62.1 Gy), median 2.5 Gy (2-2.7 Gy)/fraction. In volumetric modulated, two arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was used, with spinal cord dosage DMAX< 45 Gy. Early response rate and acute toxicities were analyzed.
The follow-up duration was 6-76 months (median 53 months). At the end of follow-up of June 1, 2019, 78.6% (22/28) patients were still alive. 3 and 5-y local control rates were 67.3% and 56.5% while 3 and 5-y OS were both 78.6% in the whole group of patients, respectively. Fourteen patients with chordoma 5-y local control rates and OS were 57.1% and 85.7%, respectively. Nine patients with giant-cell tumor of bone had a 5-y local control rate and OS were 77.8% and 85.7%, respectively. The response rate for moderate pain or above was 80% (8/10). Eleven patients (39.3%) suffered from grade 1 acute skin toxicity. Twenty-four patients (85.7%) had grade 1/2 mucositis. No radiation-induced spinal cord injury was found.
The image-guided VMAT for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine provided a satisfactory long-term local control rate.