drug-resistant epilepsy

耐药性癫痫
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的研究目的是分析自身免疫性脑炎(AE)患者的特征,以确定与耐药性癫痫(DRE)发展相关的预后因素。
    方法:在这项回顾性观察队列研究中,我们纳入了2016年1月至2022年12月的成人AE患者.根据末次随访时是否存在DRE,将患者分为两组。使用逻辑回归分析研究了DRE发展的预测因素。
    结果:在121例AE患者中,75.2%(n=91)经历了急性症状性癫痫发作,29.8%(n=36)在末次随访时发展为DRE。在多元回归分析中,与DRE相关的因素是抗体阴性(OR3.628,95%CI1.092-12.050,p=0.035),局灶性癫痫发作(OR6.431,95%CI1.838-22.508,p=0.004),难治性癫痫持续状态(OR8.802,95%CI2.445-31.689,p=0.001),脑电图发作间癫痫样放电(OR6.773,95%CI2.206-20.790,p=0.001),边缘系统T2/FLAIR高强度(OR3.286,95%CI1.060-10.183,p=0.039)。
    结论:在这项研究中,发生DRE的风险主要在抗体阴性或局灶性癫痫发作的AE患者中观察到,难治性癫痫持续状态,脑电图上的发作间癫痫样放电,和边缘系统中的T2/FLAIR高强度。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to analyze the characteristics of patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE) to identify prognostic factors associated with the development of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).
    METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled adult patients with AE between January 2016 and December 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of DRE at the last follow-up. The predictors of the development of DRE were investigated using logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: Among 121 AE patients, 75.2% (n = 91) experienced acute symptomatic seizures, and 29.8% (n = 36) developed DRE at the last follow-up. On multivariate regression analysis, the factors associated with DRE were antibody negativity (OR 3.628, 95% CI 1.092-12.050, p = 0.035), focal seizure (OR 6.431, 95% CI 1.838-22.508, p = 0.004), refractory status epilepticus (OR 8.802, 95% CI 2.445-31.689, p = 0.001), interictal epileptiform discharges on EEG (OR 6.773, 95% CI 2.206-20.790, p = 0.001), and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the limbic system (OR 3.286, 95% CI 1.060-10.183, p = 0.039).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the risk of developing DRE was mainly observed among AE patients who were negative for antibodies or had focal seizures, refractory status epilepticus, interictal epileptiform discharges on EEG, and T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the limbic system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    已经发现越来越多的与癫痫相关的基因突变,一些与灰质异位症有关-这是耐药性癫痫的常见原因。目前的研究表明,基因突变相关的癫痫不应被视为癫痫患者手术的禁忌症。目前,立体脑电图引导的射频热凝术是治疗脑室周围结节性异位症相关耐药性癫痫的重要方法。我们提出了一个耐药癫痫的病例,伴有脑室周围结节性异位症和RELN基因的杂合突变,成功用射频热凝治疗,导致有利的结果。
    An increasing number of gene mutations associated with epilepsy have been identified, some linked to gray matter heterotopia-a common cause of drug-resistant epilepsy. Current research suggests that gene mutation-associated epilepsy should not be considered a contraindication for surgery in epilepsy patients. At present, stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation is an important method to treat periventricular nodular heterotopia-associated drug-resistant epilepsy. We present a case of drug-resistant epilepsy, accompanied by periventricular nodular heterotopia and a heterozygous mutation of the RELN gene, successfully treated with radiofrequency thermocoagulation, resulting in a favorable outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    一些临床试验表明,芬氟拉明(FFA)可有效治疗Dravet综合征(DS)和Lennox-Gastaut综合征(LGS)的癫痫。然而,其最佳目标剂量的探索正在进行中。本研究旨在总结最佳证据,以告知这一临床问题。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase(通过Ovid),和WebofScience在12月1日之前发表的相关文献,2023年。随机化,双盲,评估疗效的安慰剂对照研究,安全,确定DS和LGS中FFA的耐受性,并根据剂量进行荟萃分析。该研究在PROSPERO(CRD42023392454)注册。
    纳入了来自四项随机对照试验的六百十二名患者。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,0.2、0.4或0.7mg/kg/d的FFA在从基线开始的每月发作频率中至少减少50%(p<0.001,p<0.001,p<0.001)和至少75%减少(p<0.001,p=0.007,p<0.001)方面显示出明显更大的功效。此外,护理人员/父母和研究者将接受FFA的患者的CGI-I评分为显著改善或非常改善(p<0.001).最常见的治疗引起的不良事件是食欲下降,腹泻,疲劳,和减肥,在任何参与者中均未观察到瓣膜性心脏病或肺动脉高压。对于剂量比较,0.7mg/kg/d组在癫痫发作减少至少75%(p=0.006)但没有减少至少50%时表现出更高的疗效。体重减轻(p=0.002),食欲下降(p=0.04),全因戒断(p=0.036)在0.7mg/kg/d组比0.2mg/kg/d组更常见。两组之间的其他安全性参数没有统计学差异。
    许可剂量的较高范围实现了功效之间的最佳平衡,安全,DS和LGS患者的耐受性。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023392454。
    UNASSIGNED: Several clinical trials have suggested that fenfluramine (FFA) is effective for the treatment of epilepsy in Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). However, the exploration of its optimal target dose is ongoing. This study aimed to summarize the best evidence to inform this clinical issue.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), and Web of Science for relevant literature published before December 1st, 2023. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of FFA in DS and LGS were identified and meta-analysis was performed according to doses. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023392454).
    UNASSIGNED: Six hundred and twelve patients from four randomized controlled trials were enrolled. The results demonstrated that FFA at 0.2, 0.4, or 0.7 mg/kg/d showed significantly greater efficacy compared to placebo in terms of at least 50% reduction (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001) and at least 75% reduction (p < 0.001, p = 0.007, p < 0.001) in monthly seizure frequency from baseline. Moreover, significantly more patients receiving FFA than placebo were rated as much improved or very much improved in CGI-I by both caregivers/parents and investigators (p < 0.001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased appetite, diarrhea, fatigue, and weight loss, with no valvular heart disease or pulmonary hypertension observed in any participant. For dose comparison, 0.7 mg/kg/d group presented higher efficacy on at least 75% reduction in seizure (p = 0.006) but not on at least 50% reduction. Weight loss (p = 0.002), decreased appetite (p = 0.04), and all-cause withdrawal (p = 0.036) were more common in 0.7 mg/kg/d group than 0.2 mg/kg/d. There was no statistical difference in other safety parameters between these two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The higher range of the licensed dose achieves the optimal balance between efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with DS and LGS.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023392454.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究耐药癫痫(DRE)患者的血清生物标志物。
    共纳入9名DRE患者和9名对照。前瞻性收集DRE患者的血清,并使用TMT18标记的蛋白质组学分析潜在的血清生物标志物。经过精细的质量控制,进行生物信息学分析以找到差异表达的蛋白质。途径富集分析确定了差异蛋白共有的一些生物学特征。进一步进行蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络分析以发现核心蛋白。
    在我们的研究中总共发现了117种血清差异蛋白,其中44项向上修订,73项向下修订。上调蛋白主要包括UGGT2、PDIA4、SEMG1、KIAA1191、CCT7等。下调蛋白主要包括ROR1、NIF3L1、ITIH4、CFP、COL11A2等.通路富集分析确定上调蛋白主要富集在免疫应答等过程中,细胞外外泌体,丝氨酸型内肽酶活性和补体和凝血级联反应,下调的蛋白质在信号转导中富集,细胞外外泌体,锌/钙离子结合和代谢途径。PPI网络分析显示,核心蛋白节点包括PRDX6、CAT、PRDX2,SOD1,PARK7,GSR,TXN,ANXA1、HINT1和S100A8等.
    这些差异蛋白的发现丰富了我们对DRE患者血清生物标志物的理解,并可能为未来的靶向治疗提供指导。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the serum biomarkers in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 9 DRE patients and 9 controls were enrolled. Serum from DRE patients was prospectively collected and analyzed for potential serum biomarkers using TMT18-labeled proteomics. After fine quality control, bioinformatics analysis was conducted to find differentially expressed proteins. Pathway enrichment analysis identified some biological features shared by differential proteins. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was further performed to discover the core proteins.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 117 serum differential proteins were found in our study, of which 44 were revised upwards and 73 downwards. The up-regulated proteins mainly include UGGT2, PDIA4, SEMG1, KIAA1191, CCT7 etc. and the down-regulated proteins mainly include ROR1, NIF3L1, ITIH4, CFP, COL11A2 etc. Pathway enrichment analysis identified that the upregulated proteins were mainly enriched in processes such as immune response, extracellular exosome, serine-type endopeptidase activity and complement and coagulation cascades, and the down-regulated proteins were enriched in signal transduction, extracellular exosome, zinc/calcium ion binding and metabolic pathways. PPI network analysis revealed that the core proteins nodes include PRDX6, CAT, PRDX2, SOD1, PARK7, GSR, TXN, ANXA1, HINT1, and S100A8 etc.
    UNASSIGNED: The discovery of these differential proteins enriched our understanding of serum biomarkers in patients with DRE and potentially provides guidance for future targeted therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    选择合适的抗癫痫药物(ASM)用于耐药癫痫(DRE)患者的联合治疗是一项复杂的任务,需要经验方法。尤其是在接受综合疗法的患者中。我们旨在分析真实世界条件下一组DRE患者中各种三种药物组合的有效性。这个单一中心,纵向观察性研究调查了2019年9月至2022年12月在同济医院门诊接受三药治疗的耐药局灶性癫痫患者.通过无癫痫发作率和癫痫发作频率的患者内比率来评估每种三联方案的有效性(癫痫发作频率比[SFR]<1表明疗效优异)。有效性分析采用独立t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验,通过Benjamini-Hochberg方法调整P值进行多重比较。共有511个三联试验,包括76个不同的方案,在323名入选患者中进行。在这些三联疗法中,拉莫三嗪(LTG)/丙戊酸(VPA)/托吡酯(TPM)是最常见的处方(29.4%,n​=​95)。在上次临床就诊时,14.9%(n=48)的患者在接受三联疗法后实现了癫痫发作自由。LTG/VPA/TPM和LTG/VPA/左乙拉西坦(LEV)的无癫痫发作率最高,分别为17.9%和12.8%。分别。这两种方案的SFR中位数也显着较低,为0.48(四分位距[IQR],0.17-0.85;调整后P<0.001)和0.63(IQR,0.21-1.04;调整后P<0.01),分别。LTG/VPA/perampanel(PER)是另一种有希望的方案,显示出边际疗效(中位数SFR=0.67;调整后P=0.053)。LTG/VPA/苯巴比妥的方案特异性副作用发生率最高(40.0%,4/10),而LTG/VPA/LEV的副作用发生率最低(5.1%,2/39).总之,LTG/VPA/TPM和LTG/VPA/LEV在治疗DRE患者中表现出优异的疗效和良好的耐受性。我们的结果为在这个具有临床挑战性的人群中选择三药联合疗法的ASM提供了初步见解。
    Selecting appropriate antiseizure medications (ASMs) for combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex task that requires an empirical approach, especially in patients receiving polytherapy. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of various three-drug combinations in a group of patients with DRE under real-world conditions. This single-center, longitudinal observational study investigated patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who received three-drug regimens in the outpatient clinic of Tongji Hospital from September 2019 to December 2022. The effectiveness of each triple regimen was evaluated by the seizure-free rate and within-patient ratio of the seizure frequency (a seizure frequency ratio [SFR]<1 indicated superior efficacy). The independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for effectiveness analysis, and P values were adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons. A total of 511 triple trials comprising 76 different regimens were conducted among 323 enrolled patients. Among these triple regimens, lamotrigine (LTG)/valproic acid (VPA)/topiramate (TPM) was the most frequently prescribed (29.4%, n ​= ​95). At the last clinical visit, 14.9% (n ​= ​48) of patients achieved seizure freedom after receiving triple therapy. LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/levetiracetam (LEV) exhibited the highest seizure-free rates at 17.9% and 12.8%, respectively. These two regimens also had significantly lower median SFRs of 0.48 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.17-0.85; adjusted P ​< ​0.001) and 0.63 (IQR, 0.21-1.04; adjusted P ​< ​0.01), respectively. LTG/VPA/perampanel (PER) was another promising regimen that showed marginal effectiveness (median SFR ​= ​0.67; adjusted P ​= ​0.053). LTG/VPA/phenobarbital had the highest incidence of regimen-specific side effects (40.0%, 4/10), while the incidence of side effects from LTG/VPA/LEV was minimal (5.1%, 2/39). In conclusion, LTG/VPA/TPM and LTG/VPA/LEV exhibited superior efficacy and good tolerability in treating patients with DRE. Our results provide preliminary insights into the selection of ASMs for three-drug combination therapies in this clinically challenging population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分析儿童耐药性癫痫(DRE)的病因分布特征,目的是提供有价值的观点来加强临床实践。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,收集了在2020年1月至2022年12月期间住院的167例DRE儿童的临床数据,包括性别,发病年龄,癫痫发作类型,视频脑电图(VEEG)记录,神经影像学,和基因检测结果。根据癫痫的病因,纳入的儿童被分为不同的组.进行秩和检验以比较不同病因的发病年龄。
    结果:在167例中,89(53.3%)有明确的病因。其中,结构因素占23.4%,遗传因素占19.2%,7.2%的多重因素,和免疫因子为3.6%。具有遗传原因的儿童的发病年龄明显早于具有结构性(P<0.001)或免疫学(P=0.001)原因的儿童。
    结论:超过一半的DRE儿童有明显的潜在病因,主要归因于结构性因素,其次是遗传因素。遗传病因主要表现在早期,尤其是一岁以下的儿童。这强调了积极加强基因检测的必要性,以揭示根本原因并随后指导治疗方案。
    BACKGROUND: To analyze the etiological distribution characteristics of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in children, with the aim of providing valuable perspectives to enhance clinical practice.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical data were collected on 167 children with DRE who were hospitalized between January 2020 and December 2022, including gender, age of onset, seizure types, video electroencephalogram(VEEG) recordings, neuroimaging, and genetic testing results. Based on the etiology of epilepsy, the enrolled children were categorized into different groups. The rank-sum test was conducted to compare the age of onset for different etiologies.
    RESULTS: Of the 167 cases, 89 (53.3%) had a clear etiology. Among them, structural factors account for 23.4%, genetic factors for 19.2%, multiple factors for 7.2%, and immunological factors for 3.6%. The age of onset was significantly earlier in children with genetic causes than those with structural (P < 0.001) or immunological (P = 0.001) causes.
    CONCLUSIONS: More than half of children with DRE have a distinct underlying cause, predominantly attributed to structural factors, followed by genetic factors. Genetic etiology primarily manifests at an early age, especially among children aged less than one year. This underscores the need for proactive enhancements in genetic testing to unveil the underlying causes and subsequently guide treatment protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a refractory neurological disorder. There is ample evidence that suggest that γ-aminobutyric acid-a (GABAA) receptors could be one of the mechanisms responsible for the development of drug resistance in epilepsy. It is also known that the cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) plays a possible key role in the transcriptional regulation of GABAA.
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores the role of CREB in the development of DRE and the effect of CREB on GABA-related receptors in DRE.
    METHODS: The CREB expression was increased or decreased in the hippocampus of normal rats by lentiviral transfection, who then underwent the lithium-pilocarpine-induced epilepsy model. Phenobarbital (PB) sodium and carbamazepine (CBZ) were used to select a drug-resistant epileptic model. The expression levels of GABAA receptor α1, β2, and γ2 subunits and CREB protein were measured in the rat hippocampus by western blot and fluorescent quantitative PCR.
    RESULTS: The frequency and duration of seizures increased in the overexpression group compared to that in the control group. In addition, the severity, frequency, and duration of seizures decreased in the group with decreased expression. The hippocampus analysis of the expression levels of the CREB protein and CREB mRNA yielded similar findings. Altering the CREB protein expression in the rat hippocampus could negatively regulate the expression and transcript levels of GABAA receptors α1, β2, and γ2, suggesting that CREB may serve as a potential target for the development of treatment protocols and drugs for epilepsy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that enhanced CREB expression promotes the development of DRE and negatively regulates GABAA receptor levels and that the inhibition of CREB expression may reduce the incidence of DRE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:NOD样受体家族,含pyrin结构域3(NLRP3)的炎症途径与癫痫的发展有关,并且可以通过沉默信息调节因子1(SIRT1)的激活来抑制。然而,NLRP3通路和SIRT1在耐药癫痫(DRE)中的表达和相关性尚不清楚.
    方法:本研究评估了9例DRE患者和8例接受手术治疗的海绵状血管瘤患者大脑皮质的组织病理学。它分析了NLRP3,白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)的表达,caspase-1和SIRT1使用免疫组织化学。此外,采用ELISA法测定纳入研究对象血清中NLRP3、caspase-1、IL-1β和SIRT1的含量。NLRP3通路与SIRT1的相关性采用Spearman相关分析。
    结果:DRE患者大脑皮质NLRP3、caspase-1和IL-1β的表达升高,NLRP3表达与SIRT1表达呈负相关。此外,DRE患者血清IL-1β水平上调。DRE患者血清SIRT1、NLRP3、caspase-1、IL-1β含量的相关性均无统计学意义。值得注意的是,双侧海马硬化患者血清caspase-1水平明显高于单侧海马硬化患者。
    结论:目前的结果表明,在DRE患者中,NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1β途径的表达显着上调,并且与SIRT1表达部分相关。这项研究对于了解DRE的病理生理学和开发新的治疗策略非常重要。
    BACKGROUND: The NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammatory pathway is implicated in the development of epilepsy and can be suppressed by the activation of the silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1). However, the expression and correlation of the NLRP3 pathway and SIRT1 in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) remain unknown.
    METHODS: This study evaluated the histopathology of the cerebral cortex from nine patients with DRE and eight patients with cavernous haemangioma undergoing surgical treatment. It analysed the expression of the NLRP3, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), caspase-1 and SIRT1 using immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the contents of NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β and SIRT1 in the serum samples of the included study participants were determined using ELISA method. The correlation between the NLRP3 pathway and the SIRT1 was assessed using Spearman\'s correlation analysis.
    RESULTS: The expression of NLRP3, caspase-1 and IL-1β in the cerebral cortex of patients with DRE was elevated, with the NLRP3 expression being negatively correlated with the SIRT1 expression. Furthermore, IL-1β in serum was upregulated in patients with DRE. The correlation between the content of serum SIRT1 and NLRP3, caspase-1 and IL-1β in patients with DRE was not significant. Notably, serum caspase-1 levels were obviously higher in patients with bilateral hippocampal sclerosis than in patients with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that the expression of the NLRP3/caspase-1/IL-1β pathway is significantly upregulated in patients with DRE and that it is partially correlated with the SIRT1 expression. This study is important for understanding the pathophysiology of DRE and developing new treatment strategies for it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迷走神经刺激(VNS)已广泛用于治疗儿童耐药性癫痫(DRE)。我们旨在探讨VNS的疗效和安全性,关注可能影响VNS疗效的因素,并构建VNS治疗DRE患儿疗效的预测模型。
    回顾性分析2016年6月至2022年11月在山东大学齐鲁医院接受VNS的45例DRE患儿。癫痫发作频率降低≥50%被定义为反应者,Logistic回归分析影响VNS疗效的因素,并构建了预测模型。通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估预测模型,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。
    本研究共纳入45名DRE儿童,VNS治疗后癫痫发作频率显著降低,有25名响应者(55.6%),其中6人(13.3%)获得了缉获自由。儿童癫痫问卷(15.5%)和癫痫严重程度评分(46.2%)的生活质量有显著改善。包括影响VNS疗效的16个潜在因素,最终筛选出三个具有统计学意义的阳性预测因子:癫痫发作持续时间较短,局灶性癫痫发作,没有智力残疾。我们开发了一个列线图,用于预测VNS治疗DRE儿童的疗效。ROC曲线证实预测模型具有良好的诊断性能(AUC=0.864,P<0.05),并且可以通过引导1000次重复来进一步验证列线图,C指数为0.837。此外,该模型在决策曲线分析中表现出良好的拟合和校准以及正的净效益。
    VNS是DRE儿童的安全有效治疗方法。我们开发了VNS疗效的预测列线图,为更准确地选择VNS患者提供了依据。
    UNASSIGNED: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been widely used in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in children. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of VNS, focusing on factors that can influence the efficacy of VNS, and construct a prediction model for the efficacy of VNS in the treatment of DRE children.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospectively analyzed 45 DRE children who underwent VNS at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from June 2016 to November 2022. A ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was defined as responder, logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze factors affecting the efficacy of VNS, and a predictive model was constructed. The predictive model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 45 DRE children were included in this study, and the frequency of seizures was significantly reduced after VNS treatment, with 25 responders (55.6%), of whom 6 (13.3%) achieved seizure freedom. There was a significant improvement in the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (15.5%) and Seizure Severity Score (46.2%). 16 potential factors affecting the efficacy of VNS were included, and three statistically significant positive predictors were ultimately screened: shorter seizure duration, focal seizure, and absence of intellectual disability. We developed a nomogram for predicting the efficacy of VNS in the treatment of DRE children. The ROC curve confirmed that the predictive model has good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.864, P < 0.05), and the nomogram can be further validated by bootstrapping for 1,000 repetitions, with a C-index of 0.837. Besides, this model showed good fitting and calibration and positive net benefits in decision curve analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: VNS is a safe and effective treatment for DRE children. We developed a predictive nomogram for the efficacy of VNS, which provides a basis for more accurate selection of VNS patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号