UNASSIGNED: To assess patient comfort, wound healing, and scarring at the 6-month follow-up of split-skin graft donor sites treated with Ba-Hao burn ointment (BHBO) gauze, a compound preparation of traditional Chinese medicine since 1970s, compared with petrolatum gauze.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty patients admitted to the Department of Burns of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between September 2021 and September 2022 participated in this randomized, prospective, self-control clinical study. After harvesting the split skin, donor sites were divided into two parts along the midline. BHBO gauze was applied to half of the donor wounds, and petrolatum gauze was applied to the other half. The wound healing time, pain scores on the postoperative Days 3, 6, and 9, and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score at the 6-month follow-up were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: The wound healing time was significantly shorter in the BHBO group than in the control group (10.07 ± 1.48 days vs. 11.50 ± 1.74 days, p < 0.001). On postoperative Days 3 and 6, the pain scores quantified by visual analog scores were significantly lower in the BHBO group than in the control group (5.33 ± 1.54 and 4.17 ± 1.51, respectively vs. 7.57 ± 1.41 and 5.20 ± 1.47, respectively). The difference in the visual analog scale score on postoperative Day 9 between the groups was not significant (p > 0.05). Microbiological assessment revealed the absence of bacterial contamination in both groups. At the 6-month follow up, the VSS score was significantly lower in the BHBO group (6.67 ± 1.92) than in the control group (9.57 ± 1.55).
UNASSIGNED: BHBO resulted in faster donor-site healing, reduced postoperative pain, and improved scar quality at the 6-month follow-up than petrolatum gauze alone.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is commonly used in the reconstruction of oral cancer patients. Traditional RFFF (TRFFF) techniques, which often require a secondary donor site to repair the forearm defect, may result in a scar extending to the dorsal hand. This can lead to significant functional and aesthetic concerns in the forearm. We designed a modified RFFF (MRFFF) that incorporates a glasses-shaped flap and features deep venous drainage. To evaluate its effectiveness we conducted a retrospective chart review of 105 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent reconstructive surgery between 2018 and 2022. These patients were treated either with a TRFFF (n = 60) or the newly developed MRFFF (n = 45). Our inclusion criteria, guided by preliminary surgical experience prior to initiating the study, stipulated that single oral defects should be no larger than 6 × 6 cm2, and adjacent double defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Flap size, pedicle length, harvesting duration, and anastomosis during the surgical procedure were compared between the two techniques. Preoperative and postoperative oral function, recurrence, mortality, and dorsal scarring were recorded. One-week, one-month, and six-month postoperative subjective aesthetics assessments, and self-reported postoperative donor hand function, were measured using the Michigan hand questionnaire (MHQ). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of flap size, pedicle length, harvesting time, anastomosis time, postoperative oral function, recurrence, and mortality. However, patients with a MRFFF did not require a second donor graft site and did not have scars extending to the dorsal forearm. They also had significantly improved postoperative aesthetic outcomes (1 week: 70.6%, 1 month: 62.2%) and donor hand function (1 week: 54.6%, 1 month: 40.4%) compared with the TRFFF group (p < 0.001). The MRFFF eliminates the need for secondary donor sites and improves primary donor site outcomes. It is versatile and can be employed for either single or composite oral defects. Through extensive case studies, we have defined its specific scope: it is suitable for single defects measuring no more than 6 × 6 cm2, or for composite defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Furthermore, it does not compromise the functional recovery of the recipient site, and should be widely adopted for all qualifying patients.

暂无摘要。

We report the results of using a fibula-sided digital artery pedicled flap from the great toe to cover the second toe free flap donor site, which avoids delayed wound healing, and prevents pain and skin ulceration. This study included 15 patients who had second toe wrap-around free flaps to reconstruct thumb and finger defects. All 15 pedicled flaps used to cover the defect healed uneventfully. All patients were able to stand and walk and were satisfied with the postoperative aesthetic outcome at the 6-month follow-up. We conclude that this an effective procedure for preventing donor site defects after second toe wrap-around free flap transfer.Level of evidence: IV.

Digital skin defects resulting from trauma are often associated with dysfunction of the digital nerve and the extensor and flexor tendons in the affected fingers. The repair of these complex tissue defects requires a graft containing multiple tissues that can be used to reconstruct the tendons and nerves and restore the skin. Such procedures can cause multiple injuries and significant damage to the donor site. The current study used a novel technique to repair complex dorsal and palmar digital soft-tissue defects. First, multiple tissues were cut and collected from the donor site. Then, part of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon was transplanted to repair the tendon defect, and a medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve graft was used to repair the digital nerve defect. Finally, a skin flap was used to cover the skin defect. This paper reports on 31 cases of complex soft-tissue digital defects, with defect areas of 2-18 cm2 . One patient presented with a postoperative arterial crisis in the flap. All other patients recovered without experiencing a vascular crisis, flap necrosis, or wound infection. The postoperative flaps were similar in texture to the original digital skin. The sensation and the extension/flexion functions in the affected fingers recovered well. The effect on grip strength, wrist flexion, and forearm sensation was minor and the postoperative total active motion scores of the affected digits were good or excellent in 96.77% of the cases. The flap sensation recovery rate was also excellent in 83.87% of the cases. The present technique facilitates the repair of multiple dorsal and palmar digital soft-tissue, tendon and nerve defects, reduces the damage to the donor site, and significantly improves the success of surgical repair.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to explore the epidermal barrier structure and function of re-harvested skin from non-scalp donor sites.
UNASSIGNED: Six patients with large-area deep burns who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were subjected to split-thickness skin excision three times on the same healthy non-scalp donor sites, with an interval of 14 days. The donor skin thus harvested was labeled as primary skin (S1), secondary skin (S2), and tertiary skin (S3). The transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum water content (SCH) of donor skin were detected before each surgery, and the donor skin was harvested during the surgery. The donor skin was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and involucrin, loricrin, filaggrin, small molecule proline-rich protein 3 (SPRR3), ZO-3, JAM-A, and JAM-C, or observed by transmission electron microscopy.
UNASSIGNED: The epidermal barrier function of the re-harvested skin from the non-scalp donor sites became impaired. The histopathological structure of the re-harvested skin from non-scalp donor sites became abnormal. The barrier of the epidermal stratum corneum of the re-harvested skin from non-scalp donor sites was damaged. The epidermal tight junction barrier in the re-harvested skin from non-scalp donor sites was damaged.
UNASSIGNED: As the number of harvesting increases, the epidermal barrier function of the skin decreased, and the damage to the barrier structure increased. Hence, it is vitally important to restore the epidermal barrier function for re-harvesting in non-scalp donor sites.

The vascularised forearm free flap is a workhorse flap for the reconstruction of many types of soft tissue defects. However, the difference in donor-site morbidity between the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and ulnar forearm free flap (UFFF) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the donor-site outcomes of RFFF and UFFF. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database up to August 10, 2021, to identify studies on donor-site outcomes of RFFF versus UFFF in patients undergoing reconstructive surgery. Two authors individually extracted data and performed quality assessments of the selected articles. The overall morbidity and overall effect of individual complications of the donor site were analysed. In total, 288 cases from five studies were included in our analysis. The UFFF group was significantly superior to the RFFF group regarding overall morbidity and overall effect of individual complications of the donor site. The morbidity of UFFF donor sites was significantly lower than that of RFFF, and UFFF may be an ideal substitute for RFFF in reconstructive surgery. However, additional large-scale studies are necessary to confirm this finding.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the modified direct closure method and traditional skin grafting for wounds at the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap donor site.
METHODS: Among 29 consecutive patients with wounds at the ALT flap donor site, 14 underwent the modified direct closure method (MDC group) and 15 underwent traditional skin grafting (SG group). The operative time, follow-up time, complications, Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) score of the two groups were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up times in the MDC and SG group were 16.1 and 16.7 months, respectively. Two patients showed partial skin necrosis after skin grafting, but the remaining patients\' wounds healed uneventfully. The operative time in the MDC group was an average of about 64 minutes shorter than that in the SG group. The average VSS and SCAR scores in the MDC group were 2.1 and 3.0 points lower, respectively, than those in the SG group.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional skin grafting, the modified direct closure method is more efficient for repair of wounds at the ALT flap donor site because of its shorter operative time, better postoperative appearance of the donor site, and higher patient satisfaction.

Objective: To explore the effects of free perforator propeller flap from buttock in repairing deep wound of buttock. Methods: From February 2016 to May 2018, 27 patients with buttock skin and soft tissue defects caused by various reasons were admitted to the Burn and Plastic Surgery Center of the 940th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of People\'s Liberation Army, including 19 males and 8 females, aged from 28 to 70 years. Among the protopathy, there were 14 cases of pressure sores, 7 cases of scar carcinoma, 2 cases of low-temperature scald, 2 cases of abscess, and 2 cases of pilonidal sinus. The wounds were located in the sacrococcygeal region in 15 cases, the ischial tuberosity in 8 cases, and the rest area of buttock in 4 cases after injury or lesion resection. The size of wounds ranged from 4.0 cm×4.0 cm to 12.0 cm×6.0 cm after debridement or extended resection. The free perforator propeller flaps from buttock with areas of 8.0 cm×4.0 cm-16.0 cm×6.0 cm were used to repair the wounds, and the donor sites were selected adjacent to the wounds where the skins were relatively loose. All flaps took buttock free perforator vessels as the axis and were transferred in propeller-type to repair the wounds. The donor sites were directly closed and sutured. The survival, complications, and follow-up of flaps were recorded. Results: All the flaps survived 100% in 27 patients. Congestion formed under flaps 2-6 days post operation in 2 patients due to inadequate drainage, which were healed after dressing change and drainage for 14-18 days. The sutures of flaps in the other cases were removed in 10-14 days post operation, and the wounds were healed. Follow-up for 2-12 months showed that the shapes of flaps and the donor sites were plump, which were not much different from the healthy sides, and the flaps could bear weight. Conclusions: Repairing buttock deep wound with buttock free perforator propeller flap has good effects. The donor site can be designed in the area adjacent to the wound where the skin is relatively loose and can be directly closed and sutured while repairing the wound, which can ensure plump buttock appearance.
目的： 探讨采用臀部自由穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复臀部深度创面的效果。 方法： 2016年2月—2018年5月，解放军联勤保障部队第940医院烧伤整形外科中心收治各种原因所致臀部皮肤软组织缺损患者27例，其中男19例、女8例，年龄28～70岁。原发病中压疮14例、瘢痕癌7例、低温烫伤2例、脓肿2例、藏毛窦2例，伤后或病变组织切除后深度创面位于骶尾部15例、坐骨结节8例、臀部其他部位4例，创面清创或扩大切除后面积4.0 cm×4.0 cm～12.0 cm×6.0 cm。采用面积为8.0 cm×4.0 cm～16.0 cm×6.0 cm臀部自由穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复创面，供瓣区选择在创面周边、皮肤较为松弛处，皮瓣均以臀部自由穿支血管为轴，螺旋桨式转移修复创面，供瓣区直接拉拢缝合。记录皮瓣成活情况、并发症发生情况、随访情况。 结果： 27例患者皮瓣均100%成活。2例患者皮瓣因引流不畅，术后2～6 d皮瓣下形成淤血，经换药引流，14～18 d愈合；其余病例皮瓣于术后10～14 d拆线，创面愈合。随访2～12个月，皮瓣供受区外形饱满，与健侧差别不大，能够负重。 结论： 采用臀部自由穿支螺旋桨皮瓣修复臀部深度创面效果好，供区选择在创面周边、皮肤相对松弛部位即可，在修复创面的同时，供瓣区直接拉拢缝合，可保证臀部饱满的外形。.

The treatment of donor sites after split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is a routine operation step, and complications at the donor site due to improper operation and care are unwelcome. This study evaluates whether the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied at the STSG area promotes wound healing and improves scar development. Clinical data of 30 patients who underwent STSG operations between January 2016 and January 2017 for various reasons were retrospectively analyzed. These 30 patients received two treatments and the data were summed up in two groups: the PRP group, which was the study group, included patients who received traditional petrolatum gauze dressing with PRP gel at the donor sites. The petrolatum gauze group, which was the control group, received only petrolatum gauze care without PRP gel. The time and frequency of dressing change were comparable between the two groups, and the mean wound healing times in the PRP group and petrolatum gauze group were 13.89 ± 4.65 and 17.73 ± 5.06 days, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In addition, the total Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores of the PRP group at 4, 12 and 52 weeks were 6.41 ± 0.77, 4.42 ± 0.43 and 2.41 ± 0.39, respectively, which were statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of the control group at 7.67 ± 0.64, 6.28 ± 0.62 and 4.29 ± 0.64, respectively. The use of PRP gel can promote wound healing, relieve scar development and alleviate pain at the donor site after STSG.