OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF combined with dexamethasone implant for the retinal vein occlusion patients with macular edema.
METHODS: In this prospective, case-controlled, cohort clinical trial (Register ID: ChiCTR2400080048), patients with non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion were enrolled from the Sanmenxia Central Hospital from August 2020 to April 2023. The patients were randomized into two groups. All the patients received ranibizumab intravitreal injection in the first 3 consecutive months. For the ranibizumab group, anti-VEGF injections were as needed thereafter in case of recurrence of macular edema; For the combination group, the patients received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection at 15 days after the first ranibizumab injection. The primary outcome measurements were improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT). The secondary outcomes were recurrence of macular edema, number of intravitreal injections, and injection interval. Safety profiles were also recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included, of which 73 patients completed all follow-ups. Both the ranibizumab monotherapy and the combination therapy significantly improved BCVA at all time points, compared to the baseline. The combined group achieved more BCVA improvement in 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, compared to the ranibizumab alone group. Compared to the baseline, both groups achieved significant reductions in CMT at all follow-ups. However, the combination group showed more CMT reduction at 1 week post injection, compared to the ranibizumab group. The combination group had a significantly longer injection interval, lower injection time, and recurrence of macular edema. Ocular hypertension was the most common adverse events. Lastly, intraocular pressure was all well controlled by 1-3 glaucoma medications without surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy could significantly improve the BCVA and reduce the CMT with a good safety profile.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling.
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME.
METHODS: Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume (P > 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; χ 2 = 0.296, P = 0.587).
CONCLUSIONS: PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.

OBJECTIVE: Intraocular irrigating solution is extensively applied in cataract surgery. This paper explored the difference and relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical quality analysis system (OQAS) parameters induced by compound electrolyte intraocular irrigating solution (CEIIS) or Ringer lactate (RL) solution during uncomplicated cataract surgery.
METHODS: Totally 200 senior cataract patients were randomly divided into the CEIIS and RL groups (N = 100 patients/group). The anterior chamber was irrigated by CEIIS or RL during phacoemulsification. Patients were subdivided into diabetes mellitus (DM)+ and DM- groups. The central macular thickness (CMT), hyper reflective foci (HF), modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cutoff), Strehl ratio (SR), objective scatter index (OSI), and OQAS values (OVs) at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast levels were measured preoperatively and 1 day and 1 week after operation using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and OQAS II, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Snellen scale, followed by statistical analysis of its logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the CEIIS and RL groups. Both groups exhibited notably increased postoperative CMT, MTF cutoff, SR, OV at 100%, 20%, and 9% contrast levels, and reduced OSI, indicating CEIIS and RL improved postoperative visual quality. CEIIS surpassed RL solution in improving postoperative visual quality, decelerating the increase of macular HF numbers and CMT in DM+ patients and postoperative BCVA. There was no difference between CEIIS and RL in long-term vision improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: CEIIS surpasses RL in postoperative visual recovery and retards increases of macular HF numbers and CMT in senior DM+ cataract patients.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to better understand the efficacy of various drugs, such as glucocorticoids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF), in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), and to evaluate various clinical treatment regimens consisting of different therapeutic measures.
UNASSIGNED: This study included randomized controlled trials up to February 2023 comparing the efficacy of corticosteroid-related therapy and anti-VEGF therapy. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched, and the quality of the studies was carefully assessed. Finally, 39 studies were included.
UNASSIGNED: Results at 3-month followup showed that intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) + triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was the most beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of macular edema in the center of the retina in patients with DME. Results at 6-month follow-up showed that intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) was the most effective in improving patients\' bestcorrected visual acuity and reducing the thickness of central macular edema.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, IVB+TA was beneficial in improving best-corrected visual acuity and reducing central macular edema thickness over a 3-month follow-up period, while DEX implants had a better therapeutic effect than anti-VEGF agents at 6 months, especially the patients with severe macular edema and visual acuity impaired.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=397100, identifier CRD42023397100.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the relevant risk factors of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in patients with Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their correlations with the central macular thickness (CMT).
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective study. The clinical data of 300 patients with T2DM were collected and divided into a PDR group (observation group) and non-PDR group (control group) according to the occurrence of PDR in Aier Eye Hospital (Taiyuan) from February 2019 to February 2022. The relevant risk factors were screened out through the t test and the χ2 test, and analyzed by logistic regression.
UNASSIGNED: Logistic regression analysis showed that systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, course of diabetes, fasting blood glucose (FBG), two hours postprandial blood glucose (two hours PBG) and urinary albumin were independent risk factors for T2DM complicated with PDR. ROC curve revealed that systolic blood pressure, course of diabetes and urinary albumin had the highest diagnostic efficiency. Correlation analysis demonstrated that CMT was positively correlated with systolic blood pressure, course of diabetes, HbA1c level and urinary albumin level.
UNASSIGNED: For patients with T2DM, blood pressure, course of diabetes, FBG, 2hPBG and urinary albumin are independent risk factors for PDR, and increased systolic blood pressure, course of diabetes, HbA1c level and urinary albumin level will increase CMT. Combining the above indexes to predict the occurrence of PDR has a synergistic effect, and the increase in systolic blood pressure, course of diabetes, HbA1c level and urinary albumin level will increase the CMT of the patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of vitrectomy and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implantation on retinal biomarkers in patients with advanced idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IERM) and to evaluate this treatment\'s anatomical and functional outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 patients with advanced IERM who underwent vitrectomy and were divided into a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) group (20 eyes) and a dexamethasone (DEX) group (21 eyes) based on intravitreal DEX implantation. We collected data on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), subretinal fluid, intraretinal cystoid changes (IRC), integrity of the inner-outer segment layer, and intraocular pressure.
RESULTS: BCVA improved significantly in both groups; the DEX group had a higher visual acuity gain at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.002 and 0.023, respectively). Postoperative CMT gradually decreased in both groups, with the DEX group showing a greater decrease at 1 and 6 months (P = 0.009 and 0.033, respectively). Six months after surgery, the DRIL and IRC grades in the DEX group were significantly improved compared to those in the PPV group (P = 0.037 and 0.038, respectively). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that patients with intraoperative DEX implants were more likely to have a significant CMT reduction (≥ 100 μm) from baseline (odds ratio (OR), 9.44; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.58-56.56; P = 0.014) at 6 months and less likely to exhibit DRIL at 6 months postoperatively (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.68; P = 0.021).
CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy combined with intravitreal DEX implantation facilitates the recovery of postoperative visual acuity and improvement of anatomical outcomes in patients with advanced IERM, effectively reducing CMT and improving DRIL.

UNASSIGNED: To assess the functional and anatomical effects of transitioning to conbercept intravitreal injection (IVC) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who had inadequate responses to prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively included eyes with persistent DME after at least 3 injections of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR). The analysis included the assessment of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) during 6 months after the switch.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 patients (30 eyes) were included. CMT dropped sharply from 437.8±40.67μm at baseline to 363.59±45.09,312.52 ± 39.15, 278.51 ± 37.92, and 292.59 ± 38.09 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of IVC, respectively (p <0.001). BCVA in log MAR units was significantly improved from 0.73±0.15 at baseline to 0.50±0.09,0.46±0.72, 0.40±0.06 and 0.48±0.04 after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months, respectively (p <0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Switching to Conbercept effectively improved visual and anatomical structure in DME patients who had not responded satisfactorily to previous anti-VEGF injections.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser photocoagulation (SMLP) therapy versus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with refractory macular edema (ME) secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS: This single-center, prospective, nonrandomized, case-control trial involved patients with refractory ME that responded poorly to three or more initial anti-VEGF injections. The patients were examined and divided into two groups according to their chosen treatment: the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group and the SMLP group. Both groups were followed up monthly for 12 months. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were assessed throughout the follow-up period.
RESULTS: The IVR group comprised 49 eyes, and the SMLP group comprised 45 eyes. The improvements in the optical coherence tomography findings and visual acuity were comparable between the two groups at the final follow-up. The total number of injections was significantly lower in the SMLP than IVR group. No serious adverse events occurred during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: SMLP therapy is better for patients with central macular thickness (CMT) of ≤400 μm. For patients with CMT of >400 μm, we advise continuation of anti-VEGF agents to reduce ME followed by application of SMLP therapy when CMT has decreased to ≤400 μm.

To compare short-term anatomical outcomes observed in optical coherence tomography (OCT) between intravitreal injection (IVI) with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent aflibercept (IVA) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC).
Thirty-nine eyes of 36 patients with symptomatic cCSC in this retrospective study received either IVA or SML between December 2020 and August 2022. Spectral-domain-OCT (SD-OCT) findings were compared between the two treatment groups in terms of central macular thickness (CMT), serous subretinal fluid (SRF) height, the presence of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and subretinal hyperreflective foci (HF) at baseline and one-month follow-up visits.
Both groups showed significant reductions in CMT and SRF at one-month follow-up visit. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the IVA and SML groups. Complete SRF resolution was observed in 10 out of 21 and 7 out of 18 eyes in the IVA and SML groups, respectively; however, retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) damage remained persistent in patients with PEDs at baseline.
Both IVA and SML were effective in treating cCSC. IVA and SML treatments had comparable effects in reducing CMT and SRF in eyes with cCSC. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up visits are warranted to identify the long-term efficacy.
cCSC lead to subsequent irreversible photoreceptor damage and visual complaints.IVA and SML treatments have comparable effects in reducing CMT and SRF in cCSC eyes.

UNASSIGNED: To further evaluate the necessity of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM).
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from their inception up to August 24, 2021. Eligible meta-analyses comparing iERM removal with and without ILM peeling were included. AMSTAR and GRADE classification was used to assess the methodological quality of each study and the quality for each outcome, respectively. The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: 10 meta-analyses were included. 75.9% of studies revealed no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the groups, while only 10.3% showed better BCVA favorable to additional ILM peeling. 54.2% reported no significant difference in CMT between the groups, followed by 41.7% showing thicker CMT due to additional ILM peeling. Compared to iERM removal alone, additional ILM peeling provided a lower recurrence rate in 66.7% of studies.
UNASSIGNED: ILM peeling could significantly reduce recurrence rate, but not significantly improve the recovery of visual outcome or decrease the thickness of central macula.