BACKGROUND: Bowel wall thickening is commonly observed in liver cirrhosis, but few studies have explored its impact on the long-term outcomes of patients with cirrhosis.
METHODS: Overall, 118 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were retrospectively enrolled, in whom maximum wall thickness of small bowel, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum could be measured in computed tomography (CT) images. X-tile software was employed to determine the best cut-off values of each segment of bowel wall thickness for predicting the risk of further decompensation and death. Cumulative rates of further decompensation and death were calculated by Nelson-Aalen cumulative risk curve analyses. Predictors of further decompensation and death were evaluated by competing risk analyses. Sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Cumulative rates of further decompensation were significantly higher in patients with wall thickness of ascending colon ≥ 11.7 mm (P = 0.014), transverse colon ≥ 3.2 mm (P = 0.043), descending colon ≥ 9.8 mm (P = 0.035), and rectum ≥ 7.2 mm (P = 0.045), but not those with wall thickness of small bowel ≥ 8.5 mm (P = 0.312) or sigmoid colon ≥ 7.1 mm (P = 0.237). Wall thickness of ascending colon ≥ 11.7 mm (sHR = 1.70, P = 0.030), transverse colon ≥ 3.2 mm (sHR = 2.15, P = 0.038), and rectum ≥ 7.2 mm (sHR = 2.38, P = 0.045) were independent predictors of further decompensation, but not wall thickness of small bowel ≥ 8.5 mm (sHR = 1.19, P = 0.490), descending colon ≥ 9.8 mm (sHR = 1.53, P = 0.093) or sigmoid colon ≥ 7.1 mm (sHR = 0.63, P = 0.076). Small bowel, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum wall thickness were not significantly associated with death.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal wall thickening, but not small bowel wall, may be considered for the prediction of further decompensation in cirrhosis.

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is currently one of the most common and deadly cancers. CRC is the third most common malignancy and the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It ranks as the second most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and other developed countries. Histopathological images contain sufficient phenotypic information, they play an indispensable role in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC. In order to improve the objectivity and diagnostic efficiency for image analysis of intestinal histopathology, Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD) methods based on machine learning (ML) are widely applied in image analysis of intestinal histopathology. In this investigation, we conduct a comprehensive study on recent ML-based methods for image analysis of intestinal histopathology. First, we discuss commonly used datasets from basic research studies with knowledge of intestinal histopathology relevant to medicine. Second, we introduce traditional ML methods commonly used in intestinal histopathology, as well as deep learning (DL) methods. Then, we provide a comprehensive review of the recent developments in ML methods for segmentation, classification, detection, and recognition, among others, for histopathological images of the intestine. Finally, the existing methods have been studied, and the application prospects of these methods in this field are given.

BACKGROUND: A large jejunal diverticulum has been reported as a possible cause of volvulus and acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in adults. A large diverticulum of the small bowel complicated with volvulus has been reported before in literature. However, imaging findings of a large diverticulum of the small bowel complicated with both volvulus and AMI on MDCT are rarely described and reported. In this study, we reported a case with a large diverticulum, volvulus, and AMI concurrently; these three imaging findings were reviewed and described on MDCT, and the relevant literature was briefly introduced.
METHODS: We reported the case of a 69-year-old man who presented to our hospital with acute abdominal pain and vomiting. An emergent abdominal enhanced MDCT imaging was performed and demonstrated the volvulus secondary to a large diverticulum of the jejunum complicated with AMI. Here, a case was presented that highlighted unique imaging findings on MDCT, as well as a literature review.
CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature revealed that a single jejunal diverticulum causing both volvulus and AMI is rare in adults. To our knowledge, a systemic description of their signs on MDCT in a case has not been reported yet.

Background: Hematoma of the colon is a rare hemorrhagic complication that affects patients accepting low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy. Only scarce cases of colon hematoma have been reported, usually in children or patients accepting warfarin therapy. Case summary: A 76-year-old Chinese man was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and heart failure, with cardiac function NYHA grade III on March 21, 2018. This patient was given LMWH for anticoagulation therapy and developed a colon hematoma on the third day of hospitalization. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed the thickening of areas of the colon up to 110 mm × 78 mm in thickness, which was a symptom of colon hematoma. The patient underwent conservative treatment successfully. On March 27, the patient\'s abdominal pain was alleviated, and a CT scan showed that the intestinal hematoma was absorbed. Conclusions: The most frequent minor bleeding events of LMWH anticoagulation are hemorrhage and subcutaneous hematoma. This case demonstrated that bowel hematoma despite its low incidence should be considered as an ADR of LMWH therapy, especially among patients who present with gastrointestinal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is an emergency condition that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Embolization is considered the preferred therapy in the treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding when it is unrealistic to perform the surgery or vasopressin infusion in this population. Treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (any site below the ligament of Treitz) using this technique has not reached a consensus, because of the belief that the risk of intestinal infarction in this condition is extremely high. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this technique in a retrospective group of patients who underwent embolization for acute lower GI bleeding.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of super-selective arterial embolization in the management of acute lower GI bleeding.
METHODS: A series of 31 consecutive patients with angiographically demonstrated small intestinal or colonic bleeding was retrospectively reviewed. The success rate and complication rate of super-selective embolization were recorded.
RESULTS: Five out of thirty-one patients (16.1%) could not achieve sufficiently selective catheterization to permit embolization. Initial control of bleeding was achieved in 26 patients (100%), and relapsed GI bleeding occurred in 1 of them at 1 wk after the operation. No clinically apparent bowel infarctions were observed in patients undergoing embolization.
CONCLUSIONS: Super-selective embolization is a safe therapeutic method for acute lower GI bleeding, and it is suitable and effective for many patients suffering this disease. Importantly, careful technique and suitable embolic agent are essential to the successful operation.

Traumatic incarceration of the small bowel accompanied by vertebral fractures and dislocation is rare and usually misdiagnosed until laparotomy. This report presents a rare case of jejunum entrapment between lumbar spine fractures. A 43-year-old man was clamped between two railway tracks on the upper abdomen and lower back. Following ineffective conservative treatment, he underwent a laparotomy due to the development of guarding and rebound tenderness. Loss of vitality of the jejunal loop, which was incarcerated between the L3 and L4 vertebrae, was observed. The necrotic bowel was removed and end-to-end anastomosis was performed. When his condition was stable, anterior and posterior lumbar fixation surgery was performed. The patient had no abdominal complications and lower limb nerve function deficiency during the follow-up period. A review of the literature since 1979 on incarceration of the bowel associated with lumbar fracture and dislocation identified 12 cases: five patients showed persistent neurological symptoms, but none of the patients died as a result of their injuries. It should be borne in mind that patients with hyperextension or flexion-distraction injury of the lumbar spine could show symptoms of intestinal obstruction and bowel incarceration. Enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging will be helpful for diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) in patients with Crohn\'s disease (CD).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 104 patients with CD that were treated at the Ruijin Hospital between March 2015 and May 2016. Among them, 61 patients with active CD were evaluated before/after treatment. MRI and endoscopy were performed within 7 d. CDEIS was evaluated. MRI parameters included MaRIA scores, total relative contrast enhancement (tRCE), arterial RCE (aRCE), portal RCE (pRCE), delay phase RCE (dRCE), and apparent diffusion coefficient. The correlation and concordance between multiple MRI findings and CDEIS changes before and after CD treatment were examined.
RESULTS: Among the 104 patients, 61 patients were classified as active CD and 43 patients as inactive CD. Gender, age, disease duration, and disease location were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CRP levels were higher in the active group than in the inactive group (25.12 ± 4.12 vs 5.14 ± 0.98 mg/L, P < 0.001). Before treatment, the correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs in all patients were r = 0.772 for tRCE, r = 0.754 for aRCE, r = 0.738 for pRCE, and r = 0.712 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001), followed by MRI single indexes. Among the active CD patients, 44 cases were remitted to inactive CD after treatment. The correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs were r = 0.712 for aRCE, r = 0.705 for tRCE, r = 0.685 for pRCE, and r = 0.634 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Arterial MaRIA should be an indicator for CD follow-up and dynamic assessment. CD treatment assessment was not completely concordant between CDEIS and MRI.