OBJECTIVE: Primary aldosteronism (PA) diagnosis is affected by antihypertensive drugs that are commonly taken by patients with suspected PA. In this study, we developed and validated a diagnostic model for screening PA without drug washout.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1095 patients diagnosed with PA or essential hypertension. Patients were randomly grouped into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio. Baseline characteristics, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), and direct renin concentration (DRC) before and after drug washout were separately recorded, and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) was calculated.
RESULTS: PAC and ARR were higher and direct renin concentration was lower in patients with PA than in patients with essential hypertension. Furthermore, the differences in blood potassium and sodium concentrations and hypertension grades between the two groups were significant. Using the abbreviations potassium (P), ARR (A), PAC (P), sodium (S), and hypertension grade 3 (3), the model was named PAPS3. The PAPS3 model had a maximum score of 10, with the cutoff value assigned as 5.5; it showed high sensitivity and specificity for screening PA in patients who exhibit difficulty in tolerating drug washout.
CONCLUSIONS: PA screening remains crucial, and standard guidelines should be followed for patients to tolerate washout. The PAPS3 model offers an alternative to minimize risks and enhance diagnostic efficiency in PA for those facing washout challenges. Despite its high accuracy, further validation of this model is warranted through large-scale clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate performance of aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) before washout of antihypertensive drugs as a screening test for primary aldosteronism (PA).
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients suspected of having secondary hypertension during a period from January 2017 to May 2022 at authors\' institute. For inclusion in the final analysis, ARR must be available prior to as well as after discontinuation of antihypertensives. Patients with ARR ≥2.4(ng/dL)/(μIU/mL) after washout proceeded to confirmatory tests. Diagnosis of PA was established based on positive result of the confirmatory test. Diagnostic accuracy of ARR prior to the washout in predicting PA are shown as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 1306 patients [median age of 50.2 (41.0-59.0) years, 64.0% male]. Confirmatory tests showed PA in 215(16.5%) patients and essential hypertension (EH) in the remaining 1091(83.5%) patients. In comparison to the second screening test, the first screening test (before washout of antihypertensives) yielded lower plasma aldosterone and higher renin, and consequently lower ARR in both the PA and EH groups. At a cutoff of 0.7(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml), ARR before washout had 96.3% sensitivity, 61.2% specificity, 0.33 PPV and 0.99 NPV. At a lower cutoff of 0.5(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV are 97.7%, 52.0%, 0.29 and 0.99.
CONCLUSIONS: ARR prior to washout of antihypertensives is a sensitive screening test for PA. Washout of antihypertensives could be omitted and further investigation for PA is not warranted if ARR was ≤ 0.7(ng/dL)/(μIU/ml) before washout.

UNASSIGNED: Aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) based screening is the first step in the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, the guideline-recommended ARR cutoff covers a wide range, from the equivalent of 1.3 to 4.9 ng·dl-1/mIU∙l-1. We aimed to optimize the ARR cutoff for PA screening based on the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD).
UNASSIGNED: Longitudinally, we included hypertensive participants from the Framingham Offspring Study (FOS) who attended the sixth examination cycle and followed up until 2014. At baseline (1995-1998), we used circulating concentrations of aldosterone and renin to calculate ARR (unit: ng·dl-1/mIU∙l-1) among 1,433 subjects who were free of CVD. We used spline regression to calculate the ARR threshold based on the incident CVD. We used cross-sectional data from the Chongqing Primary Aldosteronism Study (CONPASS) to explore whether the ARR cutoff selected from FOS is applicable to PA screening.
UNASSIGNED: In FOS, CVD risk increased with an increasing ARR until a peak of ARR 1.0, followed by a plateau in CVD risk (hazard ratio 1.49, 95%CI 1.19-1.86). In CONPASS, when compared to essential hypertension with ARR < 1.0, PA with ARR ≥ 1.0 carried a higher CVD risk (odds ratio 2.24, 95%CI 1.41-3.55), while essential hypertension with ARR ≥ 1.0 had an unchanged CVD risk (1.02, 0.62-1.68). Setting ARR cutoff at 2.4 ~ 4.9, 10% ~30% of PA subjects would be unrecognized although they carried a 2.45 ~ 2.58-fold higher CVD risk than essential hypertension.
UNASSIGNED: The CVD risk-based optimal ARR cutoff is 1.0 ng·dl-1/mIU∙l-1 for PA screening. The current guideline-recommended ARR cutoff may miss patients with PA and high CVD risk.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03224312).

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most frequent form of secondary endocrine hypertension, which is characterized by excessive aldosterone secretion and suppressed renin. The currently recommended diagnostic algorithm is very clear, and the plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is considered the first-line screening test. However, this indicator is influenced by many factors, some of which may cause false-negative results, consequently leading to underdiagnosed PA. Here, we report the rare case of a 38-year-old man who presented with bilateral accessory renal arteries and aldosterone-producing adenoma but had a negative ARR test result.

Aldosterone-to-renin ratio is the most reliable screening method of primary aldosteronism and has been widely used in clinical practice, but the index is influenced by many factors, some of which cause it false-negative, consequently leading to primary aldosteronism underdiagnosed. We report a rare case of a 27-year-old woman complaining of elevated arterial blood pressure and spontaneous hypokalemia but whose aldosterone-to-renin ratio were negative consecutively. She also had symptoms of polydipsia and polyuria for more than 20 years, with the volume of water intake and urine output up to 17 liters per day. Confirmatory tests of saline infusion test and captopril challenge test could not suppress plasma aldosterone concentration to the cutoff value. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT suggested an adenoma on the right adrenal gland. After excluding other known causes of hypertension with hypokalemia, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with aldosterone-producing adenoma complicated with primary polydipsia. Complete clinical remission was achieved after unilateral adrenalectomy. The histopathology showed typical features of adrenocortical adenoma which was positive for CYP11B2 by immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing results of tumor tissues revealed a missense mutation of the KCNJ5 gene [chr11:128781619, c.451 (exon 2) G>A]. All these findings supported the diagnosis of aldosterone-producing adenoma. This study has shown that negative aldosterone-to-renin ratio screening result cannot simply exclude primary aldosteronism. Comprehensive patient\'s evaluation should be taken to avoid missed diagnosis in clinical work, especially for those who have potentially curative surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio (ADRR) as a screening test in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) varies widely across the studies. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of ADRR.
METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library published between April 1971-February 2016. Studies focusing on the accuracy of ADRR for PA screening were included. Two authors independently extracted information regarding patient characteristics, antihypertensives status, true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. The random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.
RESULTS: Nine studies involving 974 patients were included. The overall sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio of ADRR were 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.93), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.985 and 324 respectively, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression showed that antihypertensive status affects the ADRR and may account for the heterogeneity (p=0.03). Subgroup analysis of patients who discontinued the antihypertensives revealed a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy of ADRR as a screening test for PA. However, as antihypertensive drugs can interfere with the interpretation of ADRR, it is recommended to interrupt therapy or at least replace with analogues that do not significantly affect the ADRR value.