Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) in a fetus with facial cleft and preaxial polydactyly.
    METHODS: A 37-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age, and the result showed an aberrant chromosome 4 or 46,XX,add(4) (p15.3). The woman consulted our clinics at 22 weeks of gestation and requested for repeat amniocentesis. Prenatal ultrasound revealed intrauterine growth restriction, facial cleft, vermian hypoplasia of cerebellum, micrognathia and absent stomach. Conventional cytogenetic analysis was performed on cultured amniocytes, parental bloods and cord blood. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) were performed on the DNAs extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed on cultured metaphase amniocytes.
    RESULTS: aCGH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed arr 4p16.3p16.1 (74,447-8,732,731) × 1.0 [GRCh37 (hg19)] with an 8.66-Mb deletion of 4p16.3-p16.1 encompassing 70 [Online Mendelian Inheritance of in Man (OMIM)] genes including ZNF141, FGFRL1, TACC3, LETM1, NSD2 and NELFA. QF-PCR revealed a paternal origin of the distal 4p deletion. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed 46,XX,del(4) (p16.1)dn in the fetus. Metaphase FISH analysis confirmed a 4p16 deletion. The parental karyotypes were normal. The pregnancy was subsequently terminated, and a malformed fetus was delivered with typical WHS facial dysmorphism, bilateral cleft lip and palate, and preaxial polydactyly on the right hand.
    CONCLUSIONS: aCGH, QF-PCR and FISH help to delineate the nature of a prenatally defected aberrant chromosome, and the acquired information is useful for genetic counseling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a contiguous gene syndrome due to terminal chromosome 4p deletions. We explored prenatal diagnosis of WHS by ultrasound as well as karyotype and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) to characterize the structural variants of WHS prenatally.
    Ten prenatal cases of WHS were evaluated for the indication of the invasive testing, the ultrasound features, and cytogenetic and microarray results.
    Eight cases were diagnosed by karyotyping and SNP array, while two cases were detected only by SNP array. Combining our cases with 37 prenatal cases from the literature, the most common sonographic features were IUGR (97.7%) and typical facial appearance (82.9%). Other less common phenotypes included renal hypoplasia (36.2%), cardiac malformation (29.8%), cleft lip and palate (25.5%), cerebral abnormalities (25.5%), skeletal anomalies (21.3%), and increased nuchal translucency/nuchal fold thickness (NT/NF) (19%).
    The most common intrauterine phenotypes of WHS were severe IUGR and typical facial appearance with other less consistent ultrasound findings. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is one very promising screening tool for WHS. SNP array can improve diagnostic precision for detecting WHS, especially for the cryptic aberrations that cannot be identified by the traditional karyotyping. Ectopic kidney may be a previously unrecognized phenotype of WHS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    OBJECTIVE: We present prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, and molecular cytogenetic features of familial recurrence of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS).
    METHODS: A 31-year-old woman was referred to a hospital at 24 weeks of gestation because of abnormal ultrasound findings in the fetus. Her first child was a boy who had growth retardation, mental defect, and a distinctive facial appearance. Based on the conventional cytogenetic analysis, the combined use of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) facilitated the prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling in the fetus. Results of the standard G-banging karyotype analysis of the fetus, the parents, and the boy were normal.
    RESULTS: The MLPA analysis revealed the same 4p microdeletion accompanied by 2p microduplication in the fetus and the boy. The aCGH analysis revealed a 3.57-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion or arr [hg19] 4p16.3 (71,552-3,636,893) x1 in the fetus and a 3.29-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion or arr [hg19] 4p16.3 (71,148-3,360,737) x1 in the boy. The 3.57-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion encompassed 39 OMIM genes. The 3.29-Mb 4p16.3 microdeletion encompassed 36 OMIM genes. They both included LETM1 and WHSC1. The 2p25.3 microduplication was smaller than 666 kb and encompassed only one OMIM gene, ACP1.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of MLPA and aCGH is an effective way to diagnose recurrent WHS. Although WHS is typically caused by a de novo deletion, prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling are necessary in the next pregnancy in families that have suffered such cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号