Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia

Waldenstrom 巨球蛋白血症
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is characterized by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma associated with large amounts of monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) protein (Owen et al., 2003). Common signs and symptoms include fatigue due to anemia, lymph node enlargement, hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, symptoms related to high viscosity, and peripheral neuropathy, among others. Despite significant advances in WM treatment, this type of indolent lymphoma remains incurable, with a wide array of patient outcomes (Ruan et al., 2020). In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy targeting cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19) has shown unprecedented response rates and durability in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. In this report, we describe a challenging case of WM that involved multiple extramedullary sites, relapsed, and was refractory to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. After anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy, the tumor burden significantly decreased and the patient\'s condition remained stable at the writing of this report.
    华氏巨球蛋白血症(WM)是一种罕见的小淋巴细胞、浆细胞样淋巴细胞和浆细胞肿瘤,会累及骨髓,甚至累及淋巴结和脾,通常与克隆性IgM球蛋白血症相关。尽管WM通常伴有惰性临床病程,但却无法治愈。本研究报告了一个具有挑战性的WM案例。该患者在化疗、免疫治疗和布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂治疗后出现复发/难治性病变,并累及髓外,但在CD19定向嵌合抗原受体T(CAR-T)细胞治疗后病情得到改善。此外,我们还回顾了文献中报道的CAR-T细胞治疗WM病例。本案例中的患者已接受一年多的随访,其病情仍保持良好的部分缓解状态,这表明CAR-T细胞疗法具有作为复发/难治性WM替代方案的潜力。人们迫切希望进行更大规模的临床研究来评估这种疗法的有效性和安全性。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:血脂谱在诊断和评估心血管疾病中起着至关重要的作用。然而,副蛋白的存在会导致自动分析仪的血脂异常结果不准确.
    方法:一名65岁女性,其HDL-胆固醇(HDL-C)和LDL-胆固醇(LDL-C)的联合浓度在3个月内持续超过其血清总胆固醇水平,表现为异常的脂质成分检测。进一步分析显示存在单克隆副蛋白,鉴定为IgMλ波段,浓度为28.0g/L该患者随后被诊断患有Waldenström巨球蛋白血症。利用异常反应动力学曲线和β定量法,以及一种不受干扰的替代方法,显示单克隆副蛋白干扰了HDL-C的测量,LDL-C,载脂蛋白A-I(apoA-I),和载脂蛋白B(apoB)时,使用罗氏检测系统。这种干扰导致HDL-C浓度虚假升高,apoA-I和apoB浓度虚假降低,而LDL-C结果受影响最小。尽管稀释样品使HDL-C和LDL-C测量值归一化,对apoA-I和apoB测定的干扰持续存在。没有其他常见的生化测试干扰该副蛋白。
    结论:当使用同质方法直接测量单克隆副蛋白患者的HDL-C和LDL-C时,建议谨慎。识别和消除这种干扰的技术是可用的。然而,免疫比浊法检测apoA-I和apoB水平也容易受到这种干扰,它不容易移动。
    BACKGROUND: Serum lipid profiles play a crucial role in diagnosing and evaluating cardiovascular diseases. However, the presence of paraprotein can lead to inaccurate dyslipidemia results on automated analyzers.
    METHODS: A 65-year-old woman whose combined concentrations of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) consistently surpassed her total serum cholesterol levels over a period of three months presented with unusual lipid component detection. Further analysis revealed the presence of a monoclonal paraprotein, identified as an IgMλ band, with a concentration of 28.0 g/L. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. The use of abnormal reaction kinetic curves and the β quantification method, along with an alternative method that did not suffer from interference, revealed that the monoclonal paraprotein interfered with the measurements of HDL-C, LDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) when using the Roche detection system. This interference led to spurious elevated HDL-C concentrations and falsely decreased apoA-I and apoB concentrations, while the LDL-C results were minimally affected. Although diluting the sample normalized the HDL-C and LDL-C measurements, the interference with the apoA-I and apoB assays persisted. No other common biochemical tests were interfered with this paraprotein.
    CONCLUSIONS: Caution is advised when using a homogenous method for direct measurement of HDL-C and LDL-C in patients with monoclonal paraprotein. Techniques to recognize and eliminate this interference are available. However, immunoturbidimetric detection of apoA-I and apoB levels is also susceptible to this interference, which is not readily removable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胸腔积液,尤其是双侧血性胸腔积液,是Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(WM)的罕见并发症。WM患者的胸腔积液有很多原因,如感染,肿瘤侵入胸膜,以及胸导管或其分支的破裂。到呼吸科就诊并伴有胸闷和呼吸急促的WM患者需要呼吸内科医师进行更多的鉴别诊断。有助于有效治疗。在这里,我们介绍了一例双侧血性胸腔积液患者的MV诊断。
    方法:我们的患者是一名59岁的男性,患有WM,表现为双侧血性胸腔积液。
    方法:患者行胸腔积液引流。确诊后,患者接受了利妥昔单抗治疗,环磷酰胺,还有地塞米松.
    结果:在这些治疗之后,病人的症状有所改善,超声显示胸腔积液减少。
    结论:尽管预后良好,WM患者胸腔积液的病因诊断具有挑战性.诊断为WM的患者时,应将胸腔积液的原因视为鉴别诊断。
    BACKGROUND: Pleural effusion, especially bilateral bloody pleural effusion, is a rare complication of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Pleural effusion in patients with WM has many causes, such as infection, tumor invasion of the pleura, and rupture of the thoracic duct or its branches. Patients with WM presenting to the respiratory department with chest tightness and shortness of breath need more differential diagnosis by respiratory physicians, which is helpful for effective treatment. Herein, we present a case of MV diagnosis in a patient with bilateral bloody pleural effusion.
    METHODS: Our patient is a 59-year-old man with WM presenting as having bilateral bloody pleural effusion.
    METHODS: The patient was treated with pleural effusion drainage. After confirming the diagnosis, the patient was treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone.
    RESULTS: Following these treatments, the patient\'s symptoms improved, and ultrasound showed a decrease in pleural effusion.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite its favorable prognosis, the cause of pleural effusion in a patient with WM can be challenging to diagnose. The cause of pleural effusion should be considered a differential diagnosis when diagnosing patients diagnosed with WM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:区分Waldenström巨球蛋白血症与闷烧的Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(sWM)很重要,因为只有Waldenström巨球蛋白血症患者需要治疗,然而,这种区别在临床上可能很复杂。这项研究的目的是研究[68Ga]Ga-pentixaforPET/CT在sWM和Waldenström巨球蛋白血症患者中是否表现出不同的特征,因此可以帮助区分Waldenström巨球蛋白血症和sWM。
    结果:分析了37例新诊断的Waldenström巨球蛋白血症和11例sWM患者[35例男性和13例女性;64.3±10.7(范围,29-87)岁]。骨髓疾病的SUVmax,淋巴结,[68Ga]Ga-pentixafor的其他髓外疾病明显高于2-[18F]FDGPET/CT(P<0.05)。在PET/CT的[68Ga]Ga-pentixa上,患有Waldenström巨球蛋白血症的患者涉及更多的淋巴结区域,三个以上淋巴结区域受累的发生率明显更高,较大的淋巴结病,与sWM患者相比,其他髓外疾病的发生率更高(P<0.05)。Waldenström巨球蛋白血症患者表现出明显更高的总病变摄取,总病变体积,髓外疾病的SUVmax高于sWM患者(P<0.05)。2-[18F]FDGPET/CT中的视觉或半定量指标均未显示Waldenström巨球蛋白血症和sWM患者之间的显着差异。
    结论:[68Ga]Ga-pentixa在Waldenström巨球蛋白血症中的诊断性能优于2-[18F]FDGPET/CT。Waldenström巨球蛋白血症患者在PET/CT中显示的髓外疾病比sWM患者更广泛。
    BACKGROUND: It is important to distinguish Waldenström macroglobulinemia from smoldering Waldenström macroglobulinemia (sWM), because only patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia require treatment, however the distinction can be clinically complex. The aim of this study is to investigate whether [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT shows different characteristics in sWM and Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients and therefore can help to differentiate Waldenström macroglobulinemia and sWM.
    RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with newly diagnosed Waldenström macroglobulinemia and 11 sWM patients were analyzed [35 men and 13 women; 64.3 ± 10.7 (range, 29-87) years old]. The SUV max of bone marrow disease, lymph nodes, and other extramedullary diseases on [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor were significantly higher than those on 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT ( P  < 0.05). On [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT, patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia had more lymph node regions involved, significantly higher incidence of involvement in more than three lymph node regions, larger nodal disease, and higher incidence of other extramedullary disease when compared with sWM patients ( P  < 0.05). Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients showed significantly higher total lesions uptake, total lesion volume, and SUV max of extramedullary disease than sWM patients did ( P  < 0.05). None of the visual or semiquantitative indexes in 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT showed significant difference between Waldenström macroglobulinemia and sWM patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT had better diagnostic performance than 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia presented with more extensive extramedullary disease shown in [ 68 Ga]Ga-pentixafor PET/CT than sWM patients did.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To conduct a nationwide physician survey to better understand clinicians\' disease awareness, treatment patterns, and experience of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) in China. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2022 to July 2022 by recruiting clinicians with WM treatment experience from hematology, hematology-oncology, and oncology departments throughout China. Quantitative surveys were designed based on the qualitative interviews. Results: The study included 415 clinicians from 219 hospitals spread across thirty-three cities and twenty-two provinces. As for diagnosis, the laboratory tests prescribed by physicians for suspected WM patients were relatively consistent (92% -99% recommendation for laboratory, 79% -95% recommendation for pathology, 96% recommendation for gene testing, and 63% -83% recommendation for imaging examination). However, from a physician\'s perspective, there was 22% misdiagnosis occurred in clinical practice. The rate of misdiagnosis was higher in lower-level hospitals than in tertiary grade A hospitals (29% vs 21%, P<0.001). The main reasons for misdiagnosis were that WM was easily confused with other diseases, and physicians lacked the necessary knowledge to make an accurate diagnosis. In terms of gene testing in clinical practice, 96% of participating physicians believed that WM patients would require gene testing for MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations because the results of gene testing would aid in confirming diagnosis and treatment options. In terms of treatment, 55% of physicians thought that the most important goal was to achieve remission, while 54% and 51% of physicians wanted to improve laboratory and/or examination results and extend overall survival time, respectively. Among patients with treatment indications, physicians estimated that approximately 21% of them refused to receive treatment, mainly owing to a lack of affordable care and disease awareness. When selecting the most appropriate treatment regimens, physicians would consider patient affordability (63% ), comorbidity (61% ), and risk level (54% ). Regimens containing Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) were most widely recommended for both treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients (94% for all patients, 95% for treatment-naïve patients, and 75% for relapsed/refractory patients), and most physicians recommended Ibrutinib (84% ). For those patients who received treatment, physicians reported that approximately 23% of patients did not comply with the treatment regimen due to a lack of affordability and disease awareness. Furthermore, 66% of physicians believe that in the future, increasing disease awareness and improving diagnosis rates is critical. Conclusions: This study is the first national physician survey of WM conducted in China. It systematically describes the issues that exist in WM diagnosis and treatment in China, such as a high rate of misdiagnosis, limited access to gene testing and new drugs, and poor patient adherence to treatment. Chinese doctors believe that improving doctors\' and patients\' understanding of WM is one of the most urgent issues that must be addressed right now.
    目的: 深度了解我国临床医师对华氏巨球蛋白血症(WM)疾病的认知,临床诊疗行为和经验,为促进我国WM规范化诊疗,改善WM患者临床结局提供研究证据。 方法: 开展面向全国多家三级以及二级医院内血液科、血液肿瘤科以及肿瘤内科医师的调研,自2022年2月至2022年7月招募有WM诊疗经验的临床医师,使用定性序贯定量调研的方法开展研究。 结果: 来自于22个省级行政区内33个城市中219家医院的415位临床医师参加了调研。调研结果显示,在诊断方面,虽然医师为疑似WM患者开具的检查检验项目较为统一(实验室检查项目建议率92%~99%、病理检查79%~95%、基因检查96%、影像学检查63%~83%),但在临床实践中(医师认为)仍有22%的患者会被误诊为其他疾病,且非三甲医院的误诊率高于三甲医院(29%对21%,P<0.001),WM极易与其他疾病混淆以及医师经验不足无法做出准确判断是医师认为的最主要原因;96%的医师认为WM患者需接受MYD88和CXCR4为主的基因检测,因其有助于疾病确诊以及指导治疗方案的选择。在治疗方面,55%的医师认为缓解症状是主要治疗目标,另外检查指标的改善(54%)以及延长总生存期(51%)也是我国医师关注的治疗目标。在有治疗指征的患者中,医师认为21%左右的患者不会接受治疗,主要是经济因素以及患者对疾病认知不足造成的。在选择治疗药物时,63%的医师会把患者是否可以负担治疗药物作为主要的影响因素,其次是患者合并症(61%)、基因检测结果(55%)、疾病风险等级(54%)等。在治疗方案选择上无论是初诊患者还是复发/难治患者,94%医师认为布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BTKi)是WM最主要的治疗药物(初治95%,复发75%),BTKi中伊布替尼推荐比例最高(84%)。对于接受治疗的患者中,医师的认为约23%的患者不能完成计划的治疗方案,主要原因与有治疗指征但未接受治疗的原因相同。针对WM的学科发展,66%的医师认为仍需加强临床医师和患者对疾病认知,提高WM的诊断率。 结论: 本研究是首项针对WM的全国范围医师调研,系统性地描述了我国医师在WM诊疗中存在的问题,包括疾病误诊率高、基因检测和治疗新药可及性低、患者对治疗依从性差,我国医师认为改善医师和患者对WM的认识是当前亟须解决的问题之一。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一例罕见的淋巴浆细胞性淋巴瘤/Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(LPL/WM),该病例最初是在65岁的女性中诊断的,最初表现为复发性双侧鼻出血。尽管多次烧灼和传统治疗无效的历史,综合评估导致诊断,强调了对持续性鼻出血病例进行彻底调查的迫切需要,特别是当标准方法失败时。该病例强调了在复发性鼻出血的鉴别诊断中考虑惰性淋巴瘤的重要性,并展示了导致成功识别和治疗罕见病因的诊断途径。喉镜,2024.
    We present a rare case of Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma/Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM) diagnosed in a 65-year-old female initially presenting with recurrent bilateral epistaxis. Despite multiple cauterizations and a history of ineffective conventional treatments, comprehensive evaluations led to the diagnosis, underscoring the critical need for thorough investigation in persistent epistaxis cases, particularly when standard approaches fail. This case emphasizes the importance of considering indolent lymphomas in the differential diagnosis of recurrent epistaxis and showcases the diagnostic pathway leading to successful identification and treatment of a rare etiology. Laryngoscope, 134:3974-3976, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(WM)是一种产生IgM的B细胞淋巴瘤。我们的研究旨在探讨CXCL13的作用,CXCL13是B淋巴细胞必需的趋化因子,在WM治疗反应和预后评估中。我们收集了72例WM患者的血清样本和临床数据,69例患者接受全身治疗,3例患者选择不接受治疗。通过酶联免疫吸附测定测量基线和治疗六个月后的血清CXCL13水平。基线时CXCL13的中位血清水平为1539.2pg/ml(范围10.0-21389.9),治疗6个月后显着降低至123.1pg/ml(范围0.0-6.741.5)。在基线,较高的CXCL13水平与较低的血红蛋白水平相关(p=0.001),较高的β2-微球蛋白水平(p=0.001),较低的白蛋白水平(p=0.046),和更高的IPSS-WM得分(p=0.013)。经过6个月的治疗,与SD患者相比,达到PR/VGPR的患者CXCL13水平显着降低(70.2pg/mlvs798.6pg/ml,p=0.002)。中位随访期为40个月(范围4.2-188)。8例患者在随访期间死亡。总生存期基于CXCL13水平而不同。按基线CXCL13级别分组时,血清CXCL13>2000pg/ml患者的中位OS为60.0个月,而低CXCL13水平的患者未达到(p<0.001)。根据治疗后的CXCL13水平,血清CXCL13>200pg/ml患者的中位OS为74.0个月,而CXCL13≤200pg/ml的患者未达到。在一组28名患者的血清样本中,血清CXCL13水平升高与疾病进展或下一线治疗开始相关(p<0.001).我们的研究得出结论,接受各种方案治疗的WM患者血清CXCL13水平降低,并与治疗反应相关。在基线或治疗后检测血清CXCL13有助于预测预后。
    Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a type of B-cell lymphoma that produces IgM. Our study aimed to investigate the role of CXCL13, a chemokine essential for B lymphocytes, in the evaluation of treatment response and prognosis in WM. We collected serum samples and clinical data from 72 WM patients, with 69 patients receiving systemic therapy and 3 patients opting not to receive treatment. Serum CXCL13 levels at baseline and after six months of treatments were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The median serum level of CXCL13 was 1 539.2 pg/ml (range 10.0-21 389.9) at baseline and significantly decreased to 123.1 pg/ml (range 0.0-6 741.5) after 6 months of treatments. At baseline, higher CXCL13 levels were associated with lower hemoglobin levels (p = 0.001), higher β2-microglobulin levels (p = 0.001), lower albumin levels (p = 0.046), and higher IPSS-WM scores (p = 0.013). After 6 months of treatment, patients who achieved PR/VGPR had significantly lower CXCL13 levels compared to those with SD (70.2 pg/ml vs 798.6 pg/ml, p = 0.002). The median follow-up period was 40 months (range 4.2-188). Eight patients died during the follow-up period. Overall survival differed based on CXCL13 levels. When grouped by baseline CXCL13 levels, the median OS was 60.0 months in patients with serum CXCL13 > 2 000 pg/ml, while it was not reached in patients with low CXCL13 levels (p < 0.001). Based on CXCL13 levels after the treatments, the median OS was 74.0 months in patients with serum CXCL13 > 200 pg/ml, while it was not reached in patients with CXCL13 ≤ 200 pg/ml. In a subgroup of 28 patients with a series of serum samples, the increase of serum CXCL13 level was associated with disease progression or the start of next-line therapy (p < 0.001). Our study concludes that serum CXCL13 levels decrease in WM patients treated with various regimens and correlate with treatment response. Detecting serum CXCL13 at baseline or after treatment help in predicting prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    3期ASPEN试验(NCT03053440)比较了布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi),扎努布替尼和伊布替尼,Waldenström巨球蛋白血症(WM)患者。使用下一代测序对98例扎努鲁替尼治疗和92例伊鲁替尼治疗的突变(MUT)MYD88患者和20例扎努鲁替尼治疗的野生型(WT)MYD88患者的治疗前骨髓样本进行了事后生物标志物分析。在52个基因的329个突变中,CXCR4突变(25.7%),TP53(24.8%),ARID1A(15.7%),和TERT(9.0%)最常见。TP53MUT,ARID1AMUT,与TERTMUT相关的CXCR4MUT发生率较高(P<0.05)。CXCR4MUT(移码[FS]或无意义[NS]突变)的患者具有较低的非常好的部分反应和完全缓解率(VGPRCR)(17.0%vs37.2%,P=0.020)和比CXCR4WTBTKi治疗的患者更长的反应时间(11.1vs8.4个月)。CXCR4NS与依鲁替尼治疗的无进展生存期(PFS;HR=3.39,P=0.017)有关,但不是扎努鲁替尼治疗的患者(HR=0.67,P=0.598),但治疗组之间的VGPR+CR率相似(14.3%vs15.4%).与ibrutinib相比,zanubrutinib治疗的CXCR4NS患者具有良好的主要反应率(MRR;85.7%vs53.8%,P=0.09)和PFS(HR=0.30,P=0.093)。在TP53MUT患者中,在ibrutinib-中观察到显著较低的MRR(63.6%vs85.7%,P=0.04),但不是扎努布替尼治疗的患者(80.8%vs81.9%,P=0.978)。在TP53MUT中,与ibrutinib相比,zanubrutinib治疗的患者有更高的VGPR+CR(34.6%vs13.6%,P<0.05),数值改进的MRR(80.8%对63.6%,P=0.11),和更长的PFS(未达到44.2个月,HR=0.66,P=0.37)。总的来说,与具有WT等位基因的患者相比,具有CXCR4MUT或TP53MUT的WM患者的预后更差,并且扎努鲁替尼导致更好的临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: The phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) compared Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Post-hoc biomarker analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing on pretreatment bone marrow samples from 98 patients treated with zanubrutinib and 92 patients treated with ibrutinib with mutated (MUT) MYD88 and 20 patients with wild-type (WT) MYD88 treated with zanubrutinib. Of 329 mutations in 52 genes, mutations in CXCR4 (25.7%), TP53 (24.8%), ARID1A (15.7%), and TERT (9.0%) were most common. TP53MUT, ARID1AMUT, and TERTMUT were associated with higher rates of CXCR4MUT (P < .05). Patients with CXCR4MUT (frameshift or nonsense [NS] mutations) had lower very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response rates (CR; 17.0% vs 37.2%, P = .020) and longer time to response (11.1 vs 8.4 months) than patients with CXCR4WT treated with BTKis. CXCR4NS was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.39; P = .017) in patients treated with ibrutinib but not in those treated with zanubrutinib (HR, 0.67; P = .598), but VGPR + CR rates were similar between treatment groups (14.3% vs 15.4%). Compared with ibrutinib, patients with CXCR4NS treated with zanubrutinib had a favorable major response rate (MRR; 85.7% vs 53.8%; P = .09) and PFS (HR, 0.30; P = .093). In patients with TP53MUT, significantly lower MRRs were observed for patients treated with ibrutinib (63.6% vs 85.7%; P = .04) but not for those treated with zanubrutinib (80.8% vs 81.9%; P = .978). In TP53MUT, compared with ibrutinib, patients treated with zanubrutinib had higher VGPR and CR (34.6% vs 13.6%; P < .05), numerically improved MRR (80.8% vs 63.6%; P = .11), and longer PFS (not reached vs 44.2 months; HR, 0.66; P = .37). Collectively, patients with WM with CXCR4MUT or TP53MUT had worse prognosis compared with patients with WT alleles, and zanubrutinib led to better clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Waldenstrom巨球蛋白血症(WM)是一种无法治愈的,易复发的惰性B细胞淋巴瘤。随着时间的推移,治疗策略已从细胞毒性药物发展到以利妥昔单抗(R)或硼替佐米(V)为基础的方案,现在已经进入了以Bruton酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)为基础的治疗方案的时代。然而,复发患者的最佳治疗仍不清楚.在这里,我们分析了377例WM患者的一线和二线治疗结果,以说明二线治疗的最佳选择.在中位随访45.4个月后,89例患者接受二线治疗,对53例患者的反应进行了评估。一线和二线治疗的主要缓解率(MRR)分别为65.1%和67.9%(P=0.678)。二线治疗(PFS2)的中位无进展生存期(PFS)短于一线治疗(PFS1)(56.3vs40.7个月,P=0.03)。然而,靶向药物组的PFS2(基于R-/V-/BTKi的方案)与PFS1相当(60.7个月vs44.7个月,分别,P=0.21)。关于二线治疗,接受序贯治疗升级(如从细胞毒性药物过渡到基于R-/V-/BTKi的方案或从基于R-/V的方案过渡到基于BTKi的方案(升级组))的患者MRR较高(80.6%vs47.1%,分别,P=0.023)和更长的PFS2(50.4vs23.5个月,分别,P<0.001)与非升级组相比。与非升级组相比,升级组患者的复发后总生存期也更长(中位数,50.4个月vs23.5个月,分别,P=0.039)。我们的发现表明,序贯治疗升级可能会改善WM患者的生存率。
    Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a type of incurable, indolent B-cell lymphoma that is prone to relapse. Over time, treatment strategies have progressed from cytotoxic drugs to rituximab (R)- or bortezomib (V)-based regimens, and have now entered into an era of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based regimens. However, the optimal treatment for the relapsed patients is still unclear. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of the first- and second-line therapies in 377 patients with WM to illustrate the optimal choices for second-line therapy. After a median follow-up of 45.4 months, 89 patients received second-line therapy, and 53 patients were evaluated for response. The major response rates (MRR) of first- and second-line treatment were 65.1% and 67.9% (P = 0.678). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the second-line therapy (PFS2) was shorter than that for the first-line therapy (PFS1) (56.3 vs 40.7 months, P = 0.03). However, PFS2 in targeted drugs group (R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens) was comparable to PFS1 (60.7 months vs 44.7 months, respectively, P = 0.21). Regarding second-line therapy, patients who underwent sequential treatment escalation-such as transitioning from cytotoxic drugs to R-/V-/BTKi-based regimens or from R-/V-based to BTKi-based regimens (escalation group) -had higher MRR (80.6% vs 47.1%, respectively, P = 0.023) and longer PFS2 (50.4 vs 23.5 months, respectively, P < 0.001) compared to the non-escalation group. Patients in the escalation group also had longer post-relapse overall survival compared with the non-escalation group (median, 50.4 vs 23.5 months, respectively, P = 0.039). Our findings indicate that sequential treatment escalation may improve the survival of patients with WM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号