Uterine Cervical Incompetence

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To explore the relationship between amniotic fluid and peripheral blood inflammatory factors and the pregnancy outcomes after emergency cervical cerclage, and to identify effective indicators for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes after the procedure. Methods: A case-control study was conducted, including pregnant women who were hospitalized at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, from January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2019, and underwent emergency cervical cerclage due to cervical dilatation at gestational age between 16 and 28 weeks. A total of 85 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis for the detection of amniotic fluid inflammatory factors during the perioperative period were included. Based on whether their baby was perinatal death, the participants were divided into the case group (28 cases with perinatal death) and the control group (57 cases with live births). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis to establish a regression model and nomogram. Results: (1) The levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 in the amniotic fluid during the perioperative period and postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly higher in the case group compared to the control group (all P<0.05). The case group underwent emergency cervical cerclage at an earlier gestational age compared to the control group, and their cervical dilation was greater than that of the control group (all P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the white blood cell counts, neutrophil percentage, and the level of preoperative CRP in the peripheral blood of pregnant women during the perioperative period (all P>0.05). (2) Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the levels of amniotic fluid WBC, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2 receptor (IL-2R), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, postoperative CRP in the peripheral blood, gestational age at cerclage and cervical dilation were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (all P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that only the levels of amniotic fluid WBC and TNF-α were independent risk factors for perinatal death. (3) Based on clinical practice, a multivariate logistic regression model was constructed including the levels of amniotic fluid TNF-α, WBC, gestational age at cervical cerclage, and cervical dilation. A nomogram and calibration curve were plotted, which suggested its good predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: During the perioperative period of emergency cervical cerclage, the levels of amniotic fluid WBC, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, with amniotic fluid WBC and TNF-α showing the closest relationship. However, there is no significant correlation between maternal peripheral hemogram during the perioperative period and adverse pregnancy outcomes. A model constructed by amniotic fluid TNF-α, WBC, cervical cerclage gestational age, and cervical dilation has a good predictive effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes.
    目的: 探讨羊水和外周血中炎症因子水平与紧急子宫颈环扎术孕妇妊娠结局的关系,寻找预测术后不良妊娠结局的指标。 方法: 采用病例对照研究,收集2013年1月1日至2019年7月31日于中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院住院,妊娠16~28周因子宫颈外口扩张行紧急子宫颈环扎术的孕妇,选取其中围术期行羊膜腔穿刺术并检测羊水中炎症因子的孕妇共85例。根据是否抱婴回家,分为不良结局组(28例)与活产组(57例)。采用单因素logistic回归分析寻找不良妊娠结局的相关危险因素,进一步行多因素logistic回归分析建立预测不良妊娠结局的列线图。 结果: (1)与活产组比较,不良结局组孕妇行紧急子宫颈环扎术的孕周较早[分别为(23.7±1.8)、(22.9±1.9)周],宫口扩张程度较大(中位数分别为2.0、3.0 cm),分娩孕周较早[分别为(32.8±4.0)、(25.2±2.0)周]、延长孕周时间较短(中位数分别为65.0、13.5 d),分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。(2)不良结局组紧急子宫颈环扎术围术期羊水中肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)1β、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10及术后外周血C反应蛋白(CRP)水平显著高于活产组(P均<0.05);而环扎术前及术后孕妇外周血白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞百分比,以及术前CRP水平的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。(2)单因素logistic回归分析显示,羊水WBC、TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-2受体(IL-2R)、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、术后外周血CRP、环扎术孕周及宫口扩张程度与不良结局相关(P均<0.05),多因素logistic回归分析显示,仅羊水WBC、TNF-α为不良结局的独立危险因素。(3)结合临床实践,综合羊水TNF-α、WBC、环扎术孕周及宫口扩张程度构建多因素logistic回归模型,绘制列线图及校准曲线,提示该多因素logistic回归模型对不良结局的预测价值良好,曲线下面积为0.811(95%CI:0.697~0.926),预测不良结局的敏感度为0.792,特异度为0.852,阳性预测值为0.679,阴性预测值为0.912。 结论: 紧急子宫颈环扎术围术期羊水WBC、TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-2R、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10与不良结局相关,其中羊水WBC及TNF-α关系最密切。而围术期母体外周血检查指标与不良结局无明显相关性。综合羊水TNF-α、WBC、环扎术孕周及宫口扩张程度构建的列线图对不良结局有良好的预测作用。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定哪些非侵入性感染指标能更好地预测宫颈环扎术后感染。以及应密切监测CC感染指标后的天数。
    方法:回顾性研究,单中心研究纳入了2021年1月至2022年12月的619例单胎妊娠患者.根据医生对CC后感染的判断,将患者分为感染组和未感染组。注册信息包括患者特征,宫颈机能不全病史,CC胎龄,手术方法(麦当劳/Shirodkar),CC的目的,妊娠中期流产/早产,感染史或危险因素,CC后第1、3、5和7天的感染指数。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来减少患者特征偏差。C反应蛋白(CRP)的统计学分析白细胞(WBC),中性粒细胞计数(NEU),中性粒细胞计数百分比(NEU_P),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),和降钙素原(PCT)在感染组与未感染组相比,采用卡方检验和t检验。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线用于进一步评估CRP的诊断价值,PCT,CRP-PCT联合应用。
    结果:在纳入的619名患者中,206名患者使用PSM进行匹配并随后进行评估。CC后第1天和第3天的PCT值在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。感染组第1天的CRP水平明显高于未感染组(P<0.05)。第3天,与未感染组相比,感染组CRP平均值显著升高(P<0.05)。IL-6、WBC、NEU,和NEU_P没有产生临床显着结果。CRP的ROC曲线下面积,PCT,第1天和第3天的CRP-PCT均低于0.7。在预防性CC组中,在d1时获得的CRP和CRP-PCT的AUC值高于0.7,表明诊断准确性中等.
    结论:对于CC手术后的女性,特别是预防目的,从CC后第1天到第3天,血清CRP和PCT水平升高可能预示着潜在的术后感染,保证密切监测。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify which non-invasive infection indicators could better predict post-cervical cerclage (CC) infections, and on which days after CC infection indicators should be closely monitored.
    METHODS: The retrospective, single-center study included 619 single-pregnancy patients from January 2021 to December 2022. Patients were categorized into infected and uninfected groups based on physicians\' judgments of post-CC infections. Registered information included patient characteristics, cervical insufficiency history, gestational age at CC, surgical method (McDonald/Shirodkar), purpose of CC, mid-pregnancy miscarriage/preterm birth, infection history or risk factors, and infection indices on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after CC. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce patient characteristic bias. Statistical analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil count (NEU), percentage of neutrophil count (NEU_P), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT) in the infected group compared with the uninfected group was performed using chi-square tests and t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to further assess the diagnostic value of CRP, PCT, and CRP-PCT in combination.
    RESULTS: Among the 619 included patients, 206 patients were matched using PSM and subsequently assessed. PCT values on day 1 and day 3 after CC exhibited significant differences between the two groups in two statistical ways (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). The CRP levels on day 1 were significantly higher in the infected group compared to the uninfected group in two statistical ways (P < 0.05). On day 3, the mean CRP value was significantly elevated in the infected group compared to the uninfected group (P < 0.05). Analyses of IL-6, WBC, NEU, and NEU_P did not yield clinically significant results. The area under the ROC curves for CRP, PCT, and CRP-PCT on day 1 and day 3 were all below 0.7. In the preventive CC group, the AUC values of CRP and CRP-PCT obtained on d1 were found to be higher than 0.7, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy.
    CONCLUSIONS: For women after CC surgery, especially of preventive aim, increased serum CRP and PCT levels from post-CC day 1 to day 3 may signal a potential postoperative infection, warranting close monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:早产(PTB)是全球新生儿发病和死亡的主要原因,宫颈功能不全(CIC)是一个重要的贡献。宫颈环扎术(CC)是一种有效的产科干预措施。然而,许多临床因素影响手术的成功率。目的是调查和比较超声和体格检查显示宫颈环扎术患者的妊娠和新生儿结局,并探讨34周前早产的影响因素。
    方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月南京市妇幼保健院诊断为宫颈机能不全、超声及体格检查显示经阴道宫颈环扎术患者的社会人口学特征及临床资料。评估患者的妊娠和新生儿结局。使用Studentt检验(对于正态分布数据)或Mann-WhitneyU检验(对于非正态分布数据)比较连续变量。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验分析分类变量。此外,采用logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线评价炎症标志物与母婴结局的相关性.
    结果:这项研究包括141名接受宫颈环扎术的参与者,包括71例超声指示的环扎和70例体检指示的环扎。与超声指示的环扎组相比,从环扎到分娩的持续时间,出生体重,体检指环扎组的APGAR评分明显降低,以及<28周时的分娩率,<32周,<34周,<37周和<37周的新生儿死亡率明显高于对照组(均P<0.05)。与物理超声指示的环扎组相比,在体检显示的环扎组中,母体血液炎症标志物,如C反应蛋白(CRP),全身免疫炎症反应指数(SII)和全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)均显著升高(P<0.05)。此外,母体血液炎症标志物,如CRP,白细胞计数,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR),SII,在妊娠34周前分娩的组中,SIRI和SIRI明显更高。此外,结果表明,在妊娠34周之前,双胎妊娠对早产的OR最高(OR=3.829;95%CI1.413-10.373;P=0.008),以及以下:SII水平(OR=1.001;95%CI1.000-1.002;P=0.003)和CRP水平(OR=1.083;95%CI1.038-1.131;P=0.022)。妊娠34周前早产的危险因素为双胎妊娠,SII水平升高和CRP水平升高,具有良好的综合预测价值。
    结论:在宫颈机能不全患者中,与体格检查显示的宫颈环扎术相比,超声显示的宫颈环扎术可能导致更好的妊娠结局.双胎妊娠和母体血液炎症标志物,如CRP水平和SII,与妊娠34周前早产有关。
    OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, and cervical incompetence (CIC) is a significant contribution. Cervical cerclage (CC) is an effective obstetric intervention. However, many clinical factors affect the success rate of surgery. The objective was to investigate and compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients who underwent ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated cervical cerclage and to explore the influencing factors of preterm delivery before 34 weeks.
    METHODS: The sociodemographic characteristics and clinical data of patients with a diagnosis of cervical incompetence who underwent ultrasound- and physical examination-indicated transvaginal cervical cerclage at Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the patients were evaluated. Continuous variables were compared using Student\'s t test (for normally distributed data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (for nonnormally distributed data). Categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test or Fisher\'s exact test. Additionally, logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the associations of inflammatory markers with maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    RESULTS: This study included 141 participants who underwent cervical cerclage, including 71 with ultrasound-indicated cerclage and 70 with physical examination-indicated cerclage. Compared to those in the ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, the duration from cerclage to delivery, birth weight, and APGAR score in the physical examination-indicated cerclage group were significantly lower, and the rates of delivery at < 28 weeks, < 32 weeks, < 34 weeks, and < 37 weeks of gestation and neonatal mortality were significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Compared to those in the physical ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, in the physical examination-indicated cerclage group, maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Additionally, maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as the CRP, white blood cell count, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), SII, and SIRI were significantly higher in the group with delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that twin pregnancy had the highest OR for preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (OR = 3.829; 95% CI 1.413-10.373; P = 0.008), as well as the following: the SII level (OR = 1.001; 95% CI 1.000-1.002; P = 0.003) and CRP level (OR = 1.083; 95% CI 1.038-1.131; P = 0.022). The risk factors for preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation were twin gestation, an increased SII level and an increased CRP level, which had good combined predictive value.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cervical insufficiency, ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage appears to lead to better pregnancy outcomes than physical examination-indicated cerclage. Twin pregnancy and maternal blood inflammatory markers, such as the CRP level and the SII, are associated with preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早产仍然是全球产科面临的最大挑战之一。随着新生儿护理的进步,更多的早产儿存活,并带来长期后果。因此,预防或延迟早产从先入期或产前时期开始是重要的。在描述的众多筛查策略中,没有人能融入所有。尽管如此,方法包括确定具有可改变的早产危险因素的妇女,泌尿生殖系统感染和宫颈长度短是最有用的。在这篇文章中,总结了当前的证据,并提出了包括宫颈机能不全在内的常见临床医生的最佳策略,妊娠中期丧失或早期早产的病史,讨论了偶然的短宫颈和多胎妊娠。
    Preterm births remain one of the biggest challenges in obstetrics worldwide. With the advancement of neonatal care, more premature neonates survive with long term consequences. Therefore, preventing or delaying preterm births starting from the preconceptional or antenatal periods are important. Among the numerous screening strategies described, not one can fit into all. Nonetheless, approaches including identifying women with modifiable risk factors for preterm births, genitourinary infections and short cervical length are the most useful. In this article, the current evidence is summarized and the best strategies for common clinical scenerios including cervical incompetence, history of second trimester loss or early preterm births, incidental short cervix and multiple pregnancy are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宫颈环扎术是治疗宫颈机能不全的唯一有效方法,有效预防晚期流产和早产。当子宫颈已经扩张或胎膜突出进入阴道时,紧急宫颈环扎术(ECC)作为紧急治疗的有效性和安全性仍存在争议,特别是在24-28周的怀孕时,胎儿是可行的。在这种情况下,是否应进行紧急宫颈环扎术仍未达成共识。
    目的:探讨妊娠24~28周单胎孕妇行紧急宫颈环扎术的有效性和安全性。
    方法:本研究采用单中心前瞻性队列设计,在妊娠24-28周时,接受超声或体格检查表明宫颈扩张甚至膜突出的单胎孕妇。将急诊宫颈环扎术与保守治疗进行比较。主要终点包括围产期妊娠丢失的综合评估,显著的新生儿发病率,和不良的新生儿结局。次要终点包括延长胎龄,早产,新生儿住院率,胎膜早破,和宫内感染/绒毛膜羊膜炎。
    结果:从2021年6月到2023年3月,共有133名孕妇参加了这项研究,125人完成了审判,根据孕妇的知情同意,将其分为急诊宫颈环扎术(ECC)组(72例)或保守治疗组(53例)。ECC组为8.33%,保守治疗(CT)组为26.42%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.06)。两组在围产期妊娠丢失和新生儿发病率方面没有显着差异。保守治疗组平均延长胎龄63.0(23.0,79.5)天,而ECC组有84.0(72.5,89.0)天,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。与CT组相比,ECC组显示28周前早产发生率显著降低,32周,34周,具有统计学意义(P=0.046,0.007,0.001),新生儿住院率显着下降(P=0.013,0.031)。此外,ECC治疗并未增加早产胎膜早破或宫内感染/绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险,差异无统计学意义(P=0.406、0.397)。
    结论:在妊娠24-28周时宫颈机能不全的单胎孕妇中,急诊宫颈环扎术可减轻新生儿不良妊娠结局,有效延长胎龄,在28周之前减少早产,32周,34周,新生儿住院率较低,并且不会增加早产胎膜早破或宫内感染/绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Cervical cerclage is the only effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, effectively preventing late miscarriage and preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) as an emergency treatment when the cervix is already dilated or when there is protrusion of the fetal membranes into the vagina remain controversial, especially in pregnancies at 24-28 weeks when the fetus is viable. There is still no consensus on whether emergency cervical cerclage should be performed in such cases.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation.
    METHODS: This study employed a single-center prospective cohort design, enrolling singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation with ultrasound or physical examination indicating cervical dilation or even membrane protrusion. Emergency cervical cerclage was compared with conservative treatment. The primary endpoints included a comprehensive assessment of perinatal pregnancy loss, significant neonatal morbidity, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Secondary endpoints included prolonged gestational age, preterm birth, neonatal hospitalization rate, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.
    RESULTS: From June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 133 pregnant women participated in this study, with 125 completing the trial, and were allocated to either the Emergency Cervical Cerclage (ECC) group (72 cases) or the conservative treatment group (53 cases) based on informed consent from the pregnant women. The rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was 8.33% in the ECC group and 26.42% in the conservative treatment (CT) group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of perinatal pregnancy loss and significant neonatal morbidity. The conservative treatment group had a mean prolonged gestational age of 63.0 (23.0, 79.5) days, while the ECC group had 84.0 (72.5, 89.0) days, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with CT group, the ECC group showed a significantly reduced incidence of preterm birth before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, with statistical significance (P = 0.046, 0.007, 0.001), as well as a significantly decreased neonatal hospitalization rate (P = 0.013, 0.031). Additionally, ECC treatment did not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.406, 0.397).
    CONCLUSIONS: In singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency at 24-28 weeks of gestation, emergency cervical cerclage can reduce adverse neonatal pregnancy outcomes, effectively prolong gestational age, decrease preterm births before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, lower neonatal hospitalization rates, and does not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查宫颈应变率(SR)的变化,宫颈长度(CL),宫颈功能不全妇女孕早期子宫动脉血流参数,并评价这些指标对孕早期宫颈功能不全筛查的临床疗效。
    这项回顾性研究是在2021年9月至2023年1月之间对60名宫颈机能不全的孕妇和100名正常孕妇进行的,并测量了妊娠早期宫颈的超声参数。颈椎SR,CL,在妊娠11-14周时测量两组的子宫动脉阻力指数(RI)。由SR表示的应变弹性成像用于评估内部和外部宫颈开口的硬度。
    在怀孕初期,宫颈机能不全组内、外宫颈开口处的SR明显高于正常妊娠组(SRI:0.19±0.018%vs.0.16±0.014%;SRE:0.26±0.028%vs.0.24±0.025%;p<.001)。宫颈机能不全组的CL明显短于正常妊娠组(34.3±2.9mmvs.35.2±1.99mm;p=.036),而宫颈机能不全组比正常妊娠组的宫颈血液灌注也差(子宫动脉RI:0.76±0.07vs.0.74±0.05;p=.048)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,SRI诊断宫颈机能不全的最佳临界值为0.17%,SRE为0.25%,CL为33.8mm,子宫动脉RI为0.78。在这些参数中,SRI的ROC曲线具有最大的曲线下面积[AUC=0.89(p<.001)],具有最高的灵敏度(78%)和特异性(82%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,宫颈内开口处的SR(OR17.47,95%置信区间(CI)5.08-60.08;p<.001)和CL(OR5.05,95%CI1.66-15.32;p=.004)在两组之间仍显示出显着差异。
    宫颈弹性成像是筛查早孕宫颈机能不全的有效工具。宫颈内开口处的SR是筛查宫颈机能不全的有价值的指标,与CL和子宫动脉血流指数相比,对筛查这种情况具有优越的临床疗效。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate changes in the cervical strain rate (SR), cervical length (CL), and uterine artery blood flow parameters during early pregnancy in women with cervical insufficiency and evaluate the clinical efficacy of these markers for screening of cervical insufficiency in early pregnancy.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study in 60 pregnant women with cervical insufficiency and 100 normal pregnant women was conducted between September 2021 and January 2023 and measured ultrasound parameters of the cervix during early pregnancy. The cervical SR, CL, and uterine artery resistance index (RI) were measured in both groups at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Strain elastography represented by the SR was used to assess the hardness of the internal and external cervical openings.
    UNASSIGNED: During early pregnancy, the SR at the internal and external cervical openings were significantly higher in the cervical insufficiency group than those in the normal pregnancy group (SR I: 0.19 ± 0.018% vs. 0.16 ± 0.014%; SR E: 0.26 ± 0.028% vs. 0.24 ± 0.025%; p < .001). The CL was significantly shorter in the cervical insufficiency group than that measured in the normal pregnancy group (34.3 ± 2.9 mm vs. 35.2 ± 1.99 mm; p = .036), while cervical blood perfusion was also poorer in the cervical insufficiency group than that in the normal pregnancy group (uterine artery RI: 0.76 ± 0.07 vs. 0.74 ± 0.05; p = .048). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the optimal critical values for diagnosing cervical insufficiency were 0.17% for SR I, 0.25% for SR E, 33.8 mm for CL, and 0.78 for uterine artery RI. Of these parameters, the ROC curve for SR I had the largest area under the curve [AUC = 0.89 (p < .001)], with the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (82%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the SR at the internal cervical opening (OR 17.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.08-60.08; p < .001) and CL (OR 5.05, 95% CI 1.66-15.32; p = .004) still showed significant differences between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical elastography is an effective tool for screening early pregnancy cervical insufficiency. The SR at the internal cervical opening is a valuable indicator for screening cervical insufficiency and has superior clinical efficacy for screening for this condition compared to that of CL and the uterine artery blood flow index.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究旨在确定预测危险因素,以确定宫颈功能不全(CIC)妊娠的高阶段组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎(HCA)。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括116名需要预防性和治疗性环扎术的宫颈机能不全孕妇。在患者知情同意的情况下对胎盘进行组织病理学检查。根据HCA的严重程度对纳入本研究的所有病例进行划分。分析其人口学特征及与母儿结局相关的参数。此外,围手术期参数环扎术,包括宫颈长度,宫颈形态学,比较两组实验室指标。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定严重绒毛膜羊膜炎的危险因素。
    结果:重度HCA与宫颈形态显著相关,环扎指征,环扎类型,通过超声和阴道检查测量宫颈长度。在调整了混杂因素后,多因素logistic回归分析显示V型漏斗型和宫颈短是重度HCA的独立危险因素。分别。
    结论:V型漏斗状和短宫颈可能提示高阶段性HCA风险升高。由于与高阶段HCA相关的负面结果,适当的产前治疗可以改善宫缩人群的妊娠结局.为了方便产后治疗,应常规建议进行胎盘组织学检查以确定高阶段HCA,特别是在高危妊娠中。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify predictive risk factor to identify high-stage histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) in pregnancies with cervical incompetence (CIC).
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by including 116 pregnant women with cervical incompetence that required prophylactical and therapeutical cerclage. The histopathology examination on placenta was conducted with informed patient consent. All the cases included in this study were divided based on the severity degree of HCA. The demographic characteristic and the parameters related to maternal and fetal outcome were all analyzed. Besides, perioperative parameters of cerclage, including cervical length, cervical morphology, and laboratory indexes were also compared between two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the risk factor of severe chorioamnionitis.
    RESULTS: Severe HCA was significantly associated with cervical morphology, cerclage indication, cerclage type, and cervical length measured via ultrasound and vaginal examination. After adjusted for confounders, V-type funneling and short cervix was indicated as independent risk factors of severe HCA by multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: V-type funneling and short cervix may indicate the elevated risk of high-stage HCA. Due to the negative outcomes related with high-stage HCA, appropriate prenatal treatment would improve the pregnancy outcomes in cerclaged population. To facilitate postpartum treatment, placental histological examination should be routinely recommended to identify the high-stage HCA, especially in high risk pregnancies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:确定宫颈环扎术在无症状双胎妊娠宫颈缩短或扩张中的效果和最佳时间。
    方法:这项观察性回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2022年在温州医科大学附属第二医院诊断为无症状宫颈缩短或扩张的所有无症状双胎妊娠妇女。将纳入的妇女分为环扎组(n=36)和无环扎组(n=22)。再根据环扎时间分为环扎组(<24周组)和环扎组(24~28周组)。根据超声指示或体格检查指示环扎的时间,将无环扎组进一步分为无环扎组(<24周组)和无环扎组(24-28周组)。PTB的发生率<妊娠24、28、32和34周,比较各组的母婴结局.
    结果:在环扎组中,分娩时的胎龄(GA)较高(P=0.005),出现环扎组与分娩之间的间隔时间较长(P<0.001)。妊娠28、32和34周前的PTB发生率,环扎组剖宫产率和死胎率较低(P<0.05)。环扎组双胞胎的出生体重较高(P=0.012)。在没有环扎的情况下,进入NICU的频率更高(P=0.008)。亚组分析显示,环扎组出现和分娩的间隔时间更长(<24周)(P<0.001)。在环扎组(<24周)中,分娩时的GA和双胞胎的出生体重显着升高(P<0.001)。在演讲中没有发现GA的差异,GA在交货时,环扎组(24-28周组)与对照组(24-28周组)之间的分娩间隔时间和出生体重(P>0.05)。
    结论:Cerclage似乎延长了分娩时的GA以及出现到分娩之间的间隔时间,在宫颈缩短或扩张的无症状双胎妊娠中,可能降低妊娠28,32和34周前PTB的发生率和不良围产期结局.妊娠24周前环扎术在分娩时显示较长的GA,从分娩到分娩之间的间隔时间更长,双胞胎的出生体重更高。大会在演讲中,GA在交货时,在24~28周有环扎的女性中,从分娩到出生体重的间隔时间与24~28周无环扎的女性相似.
    BACKGROUND: To identify the effect and optimal time of cervical cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation.
    METHODS: This observational retrospective study enrolled all women with asymptomatic twin pregnancies who were diagnosed with asymptomatic cervical shortening or dilation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between 2010 and 2022. Women included were allocated into the cerclage group (n = 36) and the no cerclage group (n = 22). The cerclage group was further divided into the cerclage group (< 24 weeks group) and the cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) according to the time of cerclage. The no cerclage group was further divided into no cerclage group (< 24 weeks group) and no cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) according to the time of ultrasound-indicated or physical exam indicated cerclage. The rates of PTB < 24, 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared among the groups.
    RESULTS: The gestational age (GA) at delivery was higher (P = 0.005) and the interval time between the presentation of the indicated cerclage and delivery was longer in the cerclage group (P < 0.001). The rates of PTB before 28, 32, and 34 weeks of gestation, caesarean section and stillbirth were lower in the cerclage group (P < 0.05). The birthweight of the twins was higher in the cerclage group (P = 0.012). Admissions to the NICU were more frequent in pregnancies with no cerclage (P = 0.008). Subgroup analysis showed that the interval time between the presentation and delivery was longer in the cerclage group (< 24 weeks) (P < 0.001). The GA at delivery and the birthweight of the twins were significantly higher in the cerclage group (< 24 weeks) (P < 0.001). No differences were found in the GA at presentation, the GA at delivery, the interval time between the presentation to delivery and birthweight between the cerclage group (24-28 weeks group) and the control group (24-28 weeks group) (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Cerclage appears to prolong the GA at delivery and the interval time between the presentation to delivery, and may reduce the incidence of PTB before 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with cervical shortening or dilation. Cerclage before 24 weeks of gestation showed longer GA at delivery, longer interval time between the presentation to delivery and higher birthweight of the twins. The GA at presentation, the GA at delivery, the interval time between the presentation to delivery and birthweight in women with cerclage at 24-28 weeks were similar to those in women without cerclage at 24-28 weeks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨既往晚期流产(LM)对不孕症妇女后续妊娠结局的预后影响。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2008年1月至2020年12月在体外受精(IVF)周期中首次胚胎移植后经历LM的夫妇。进行亚组分析和二元逻辑回归以评估由于不同原因导致的LM与随后的妊娠结局之间的关联。
    结果:本研究共纳入1072名经历过LM的女性,包括458、146、412和56名由于无法解释的因素(unLM)而患有LM的女性,胎儿因素(FELM),宫颈因素(ceLM;即宫颈功能不全),和创伤因素(trLM),分别。与普通IVF(gIVF)人群相比,unLM组的早期流产率明显更高(8.28%vs.13.47%,调整后的比值比[OR]1.60,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.12-2.28;P=0.01)。此外,unLM和ceLM组的女性患复发性LM的风险显著增加(unLM:4.24%vs.9.43%,OR1.91,95%CI1.24-2.94;P=0.003;CELM:4.24%vs.15.53%,OR2.68,95%CI1.82-3.95;P<0.001),因此减少了活产的频率(unLM:49.96%vs.43.01%,OR0.75,95%CI0.61-0.91;P=0.004;CELM:49.96%与38.59%,OR0.61,95%CI0.49-0.77;P<0.001)与gIVF人群相比。
    结论:先前的LM由于无法解释的因素或宫颈机能不全与随后的胚胎移植后较高的流产风险和较低的活产率显著相关。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the prognostic impact of a previous late miscarriage (LM) on the subsequent pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included couples who had experienced LM following their first embryo transfer during an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from January 2008 to December 2020. Subgroup analysis and binary logistic regression were performed to evaluate the associations between LM due to different causes and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.
    RESULTS: A total of 1072 women who had experienced LM were included in this study, comprising 458, 146, 412, and 56 women with LM due to unexplained factors (unLM), fetal factors (feLM), cervical factors (ceLM; i.e. cervical incompetence), and trauma factors (trLM), respectively. Compared with the general IVF (gIVF) population, the early miscarriage rate was significantly higher in the unLM group (8.28% vs. 13.47%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.12-2.28; P = 0.01). Furthermore, women in the unLM and ceLM groups had a dramatically increased risk of recurrent LM (unLM: 4.24% vs. 9.43%, aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.24-2.94; P = 0.003; ceLM: 4.24% vs.15.53%, aOR 2.68, 95% CI 1.82-3.95; P < 0.001) and consequently a reduced frequency of live birth (unLM: 49.96% vs. 43.01%, aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.91; P = 0.004; ceLM: 49.96% vs. 38.59%, aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; P < 0.001) compared with the gIVF population.
    CONCLUSIONS: A previous LM due to an unexplained factor or cervical incompetence was significantly associated with a higher risk of miscarriage and a lower live birth rate after subsequent embryo transfer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估双胎妊娠行紧急宫颈环扎术的围产期结局及其影响因素。本回顾性队列研究包括2015年1月至2021年12月在温州医科大学附属第二医院和育英儿童医院记录的临床数据。该研究包括接受紧急环扎术的103例妊娠(26例双胎妊娠和77例单胎妊娠)和接受期待治疗的17例双胎妊娠的数据。双胎急诊环扎术的中位孕龄明显低于单胎急诊环扎术,但高于预期治疗(28.5、34.0和24.0周,分别)。双胎急诊环扎术的中位分娩间隔明显低于单胎急诊环扎术,但显著高于预期治疗的双胎妊娠(37.0、78.0和7.0天,分别)。影响状态关于这个主题已经知道什么?早产的一个重要原因是宫颈机能不全。宫颈环扎术延长了宫颈机能不全妇女的妊娠期。根据2019年SOGC的编号。373-宫颈功能不全和宫颈环扎术,双胎和单胎妊娠都受益于紧急环扎术。然而,关于双胎妊娠紧急环扎术的妊娠结局的信息很少.这项研究的结果补充了什么?这项研究表明,接受紧急环扎术的双胎妊娠的妊娠结局优于期待治疗,但比接受紧急环扎术的单胎妊娠的妊娠结局差。这些发现对临床实践和/或进一步研究有什么意义?在这项研究中,双胎妊娠中宫颈机能不全的孕妇可以从紧急环扎术中受益,我们应该尽早治疗那些孕妇。
    The present study aimed to evaluate the perinatal outcomes and influencing factors in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cervical cerclage. The present retrospective cohort study included clinical data that were recorded between January 2015 and December 2021 at The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children\'s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (China). The study included data from 103 pregnancies (26 twin and 77 singleton pregnancies) that underwent emergency cerclage and 17 twin pregnancies that underwent expectant treatment. The median gestational age of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but higher than that of expectant treatment (28.5, 34.0 and 24.0 weeks, respectively). The median interval to delivery of twin emergency cerclage was significantly lower than that of singleton emergency cerclage, but significantly higher than that of expectantly treated twin pregnancies (37.0, 78.0 and 7.0 days, respectively).IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? An important cause of premature birth is cervical insufficiency. Cervical cerclage extends the gestational period of women with cervical insufficiency. According to 2019 SOGC\'s No. 373-Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage, both twin and single pregnancies benefit from emergency cerclage. However, there is minimal information about the pregnancy outcomes of emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies.What the results of this study add? This study shows that the outcomes of pregnancy in twin pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage were better than that of expectant treatment but worse than that in singleton pregnancies undergoing emergency cerclage.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In this study, pregnant women with cervical insufficiency in twin pregnancies can benefit from emergency cerclage, we should treat those pregnant women as early as possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号