暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Cerclage operation is one of the most common obstetric controversies. The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes and placental inflammation of cerclage performed adherent and non-adherent to international guidelines.
METHODS: This study included all consecutive women with singleton deliveries who underwent cerclage. According to the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guideline, we designated our study population into two groups: the adherent-to-guideline and non-adherent groups. Each group was categorized into two groups according to cervical length (CL) at the time of cerclage (<2.0 cm vs. ≥2.0 cm). We evaluated the reasons for cerclage, maternal characteristics, perioperative variables, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and placental inflammatory pathology according to the criteria proposed by the Society of Pediatric Pathology.
RESULTS: Among 310 women with cerclage, we excluded patients (n = 21) with indicated preterm delivery (PTD), major fetal anomaly, fetal death in-utero, and missing information for reason of cerclage. We also excluded patients who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage (n = 53) and with missing information of CL at the time of cerclage (n = 52). A total of 184 women were eventually analyzed. In women with CL < 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group showed similar PTD (<28 weeks, <34 weeks) and neonatal composite morbidity rates compared to the adherent-to-guideline group. However, in women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group manifested significantly higher PTD (<28 weeks; 16.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.04, <34 weeks; 23.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.006) and neonatal composite morbidity (20.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.028) rates than the adherent-to-guideline group despite similar perioperative variables and lower PTD history rates. The non-adherent group with CL ≥ 2 cm at the time of cerclage was also associated with severe histologic chorioamnionitis (p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Cerclage performed beyond the current guidelines in pregnant women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm may confer an additional risk of perinatal complications in association with severe placental inflammation.

• To assess the association between sonography-derived cervical length measurement and preterm birth. • To describe the various techniques to measure cervical length using sonography. • To review the natural history of the short cervix. • To review the clinical uses, predictive ability, and utility of sonography-measured short cervix.
Reduction in rates of prematurity and/or better identification of those at risk, as well as possible prevention of unnecessary interventions.
Clinicians involved in the obstetrical management or cervical imaging of patients at increased risk of a short cervix.
Women at increased risk of a short cervix or at risk of preterm birth.
Literature published up to June 2019 was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (preterm labour, ultrasound, cervix, cervical insufficiency, transvaginal, transperineal, cervical length, fibronectin). Results were restricted to general and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.
The evidence and this guideline were reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the recommendations were made and graded according to the rankings of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Online Appendix Table A1).
Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Use of the sonographic technique reviewed in this guideline may help identify women at risk of preterm birth and, in some circumstances, lead to interventions that may reduce the rate of preterm birth. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES): RECOMMENDATIONS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES).

OBJECTIVE: This is an official guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence obtained from recently published scientific literature, the experience of the members of the guideline commission and the views of self-help groups.
METHODS: The members of the participating medical societies and organizations developed Recommendations and Statements based on the international literature. The Recommendations and Statements were adopted following a formal consensus process (structured consensus conference with neutral moderation, voting done in writing using the Delphi method to achieve consensus).
CONCLUSIONS: Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents Statements and Recommendations on the tertiary prevention of preterm birth and the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes.
ZIEL: Offizielle Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (DGGG), der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (ÖGGG) und der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe (SGGG). Ziel der Leitlinie ist es, die Prädiktion, die Prävention und das Management der Frühgeburt anhand der aktuellen Literatur, der Erfahrung der Mitglieder der Leitlinienkommission einschließlich der Sicht der Selbsthilfe evidenzbasiert zu verbessern. METHODEN: Anhand der internationalen Literatur entwickelten die Mitglieder der beteiligten Fachgesellschaften und Organisationen Empfehlungen und Statements. Diese wurden in einem formalen Prozess (strukturierte Konsensuskonferenzen mit neutraler Moderation, schriftliche Delphi-Abstimmung) verabschiedet. EMPFEHLUNGEN: Der Teil 2 dieser Kurzversion der Leitlinie zeigt Statements und Empfehlungen zur tertiären Prävention der Frühgeburt sowie zum Management des frühen vorzeitigen Blasensprungs.

UNASSIGNED: Preterm birth is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common intervention performed to improve perinatal outcomes for a woman experiencing cervical dilation in the second trimester without signs or symptoms of preterm labor is the cerclage.
UNASSIGNED: We sought to review and compare available national guidelines on cerclage use.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a descriptive review of 3 national guidelines on cerclage: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin on \"Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Insufficiency,\" Green-top Guideline from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists entitled \"Cervical Cerclage,\" and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Clinical Practice Bulletin entitled \"Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage.\" Guidelines were compared, and the following aspects of cerclage use for prevention of preterm delivery were summarized: indications and contraindications, risk factors for cervical insufficiency, perioperative considerations, and timing of removal. Recommendations and strength of evidence were reviewed based on each guideline\'s method of reporting. The references were compared with regard to the total number of randomized control trials, Cochrane Reviews, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses cited.
UNASSIGNED: The variations highlighted in the guidelines reflect the heterogeneity of the literature contributing to guidelines and the challenges of diagnosing and managing cervical insufficiency.
UNASSIGNED: A cohesive international guideline may improve safety and quality and optimize patient outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians.
UNASSIGNED: After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to outline variations in indications and contraindications for cervical cerclage use by international guideline, identify variation in perioperative considerations for cervical cerclage use by international guideline, and recognize variation in timing of removal by international guideline.

The updated Guidelines on Prevention of Perinatal Group B Streptococcal Disease, issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, actually represent the mainstay in the prevention of neonatal early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis. According to these guidelines, patients with possible preterm delivery are screened for GBS colonization and offered intrapartum prophylaxis only if they enter preterm labor or experience preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Nonetheless, the fulfillment of these recommendations seems to be suboptimal in clinical practice, as it is heavily influenced by the knowledge of the colonization status. We report here 2 cases of blood culture-proven, early-onset neonatal GBS sepsis involving preterm infants delivered by mothers who had midtrimester cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes. Midtrimester acute cervical insufficiency strongly predicts preterm delivery. These women are liable to miss intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis because they typically have shorter labor, and the test results for GBS status are unlikely to be available before delivery. We believe that women with midtrimester cervical insufficiency and bulging membranes should be screened for GBS infection soon after hospital admittance if the gestational age is close to the threshold of fetal viability. A timely diagnosis of GBS colonization may not only increase the number of patients receiving targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis but would also allow consideration of the administration of antepartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Indeed, as further outlined in this report, GBS intraamniotic infection may dramatically occur before the onset of preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

暂无摘要。