United States Food and Drug Administration

美国食品和药物管理局
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究基于FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库进行了药物警戒分析,以比较吸入或鼻用倍氯米松的感染风险,氟替卡松,布地奈德,环索奈德,莫米松,曲安奈德.
    我们使用比例失衡分析来评估ICS/INC与感染事件之间的相关性。数据是从2015年4月至2023年9月的FAERS数据库中提取的。进一步分析其临床特点,感染部位,以及ICS和INCs感染不良事件(AEs)的病原菌。我们使用气泡图来显示它们的前5个感染不良事件。
    我们分析了21,837例与ICS和INCs相关的感染不良事件报告,平均年龄为62.12岁。其中,61.14%的感染报告与女性有关。据报道,氟替卡松感染的三分之一发生在下呼吸道,布地奈德,Ciclesonidec,和莫米松;曲安奈德报告的感染中有40%以上是眼部感染;倍氯米松引起的口腔感染率为7.39%。倍氯米松引起的真菌和病毒感染的报告率分别为21.15%和19.2%,分别。布地奈德和西索奈德引起的分枝杆菌感染分别占3.29%和2.03%,分别。气泡图显示ICS组有更多的真菌感染,口腔感染,肺炎,支气管炎,等。INCs组有更多的眼部症状,鼻炎,鼻窦炎,鼻咽炎,等。
    使用ICS和INCs的女性更容易发生感染事件。与布地奈德相比,氟替卡松似乎有较高的肺炎和口腔念珠菌病的风险。莫米松可能导致更多的上呼吸道感染。倍氯米松的口腔感染风险较高。倍氯米松会导致更多的真菌和病毒感染,而环索奈德和布地奈德更容易感染分枝杆菌。
    UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to compare the infection risk of inhaled or nasal Beclomethasone, Fluticasone, Budesonide, Ciclesonide, Mometasone, and Triamcinolone Acetonide.
    UNASSIGNED: We used proportional imbalance analysis to evaluate the correlation between ICS /INCs and infection events. The data was extracted from the FAERS database from April 2015 to September 2023. Further analysis was conducted on the clinical characteristics, site of infection, and pathogenic bacteria of ICS and INCs infection adverse events (AEs). We used bubble charts to display their top 5 infection adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed 21,837 reports of infection AEs related to ICS and INCs, with an average age of 62.12 years. Among them, 61.14% of infection reports were related to females. One-third of infections reported to occur in the lower respiratory tract with Fluticasone, Budesonide, Ciclesonidec, and Mometasone; over 40% of infections reported by Triamcinolone Acetonide were eye infections; the rate of oral infections caused by Beclomethasone were 7.39%. The reported rates of fungal and viral infections caused by beclomethasone were 21.15% and 19.2%, respectively. The mycobacterial infections caused by Budesonide and Ciclesonidec account for 3.29% and 2.03%, respectively. Bubble plots showed that the ICS group had more fungal infections, oral infections, pneumonia, tracheitis, etc. The INCs group had more eye symptoms, rhinitis, sinusitis, nasopharyngitis, etc.
    UNASSIGNED: Women who use ICS and INCs are more prone to infection events. Compared to Budesonide, Fluticasone seemed to have a higher risk of pneumonia and oral candidiasis. Mometasone might lead to more upper respiratory tract infections. The risk of oral infection was higher with Beclomethasone. Beclomethasone causes more fungal and viral infections, while Ciclesonide and Budesonide are more susceptible to mycobacterial infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    唑类抗真菌药物通常用于治疗外阴阴道念珠菌病(VVC)。在现实世界中尚未系统地分析唑类药物的肾毒性和发育毒性。我们使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)来调查与咪唑治疗VVC相关的不良事件(AE)。使用OpenVigil2.1检索FAERS数据(从2004年第1季度到2022年第3季度),并根据监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)检索和标准化AE。在前10个系统器官类(SOC)中,所有四种药物都被发现患有肾脏和泌尿系统疾病以及怀孕。我们发现了重要的信号,包括克霉唑[膀胱移行细胞癌,(报告赔率比,ROR=291.66)],[胎儿死亡,(ROR=10.28)],酮康唑[肾性贫血(ROR=22.1)],[胎膜早破(ROR=22.9146.45,11,3)],咪康唑[血尿(ROR=19.03)],[新生儿败血症(ROR=123.71)],[自然流产(ROR=5.98)],益康唑[急性肾损伤(ROR=4.41)],[自然流产(ROR=19.62)]。我们还发现了未报告的新的不良反应。因此,当使用咪唑药物进行治疗时,有必要密切监测患者的肾功能,注意胎儿在怀孕期间的发育毒性,并意识到可能发生的潜在不良反应。
    Azole antifungal drugs are commonly used to treat vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). The nephrotoxicity and developmental toxicity of azole drugs have not been systematically analyzed in the real world. We used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate the adverse events (AEs) associated with imidazole therapy for VVC. FAERS data (from quarter 1 2004 to quarter 3 2022) were retrieved using OpenVigil 2.1, and AEs were retrieved and standardized according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). In the top 10 System Organ Class (SOC), all four drugs have been found to have kidney and urinary system diseases and pregnancy. We found significant signals, including clotrimazole [bladder transitional cell carcinoma, (report odds ratio, ROR = 291.66)], [fetal death, (ROR = 10.28)], ketoconazole[nephrogenic anemia (ROR = 22.1)], [premature rupture of membranes (ROR = 22.91 46.45, 11, 3)], Miconazole[hematuria (ROR = 19.03)], [neonatal sepsis (ROR = 123.71)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 5.98)], Econazole [acute kidney injury (ROR = 4.41)], [spontaneous abortion (ROR = 19.62)]. We also discovered new adverse reactions that were not reported. Therefore, when using imidazole drugs for treatment, it is necessary to closely monitor the patient\'s renal function, pay attention to the developmental toxicity of the fetus during pregnancy, and be aware of potential adverse reactions that may occur.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Tafamidis是世界上第一个也是唯一一个被批准用于治疗罕见疾病转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样心肌病(ATTR-CM)的口服药物。已知药物在治疗过程中有不同的不良反应。然而,目前有限的临床研究未发现对他法米的显著不良反应.Tafamidis已经上市5年了,美国食品和药物管理局的不良事件报告系统(FAERS)已经报告了大量以tafamidis为主要可疑药物的不良药物事件(ADE)报告.我们在FAERS中检索了8170份不良事件报告,其中Tafamidis是第一个可疑药物,并挖掘这些报告中的积极信号,以对tafamidis潜在可能的不良事件进行风险警告。我们发现,由于报告者对ATTR的认识不足,报告了大量与原发疾病相关的不良事件,导致心脏疾病系统中报告的大量阳性信号。我们还发现,tafamidis有可能引起耳和迷宫系统疾病和尿路感染细菌的不良事件风险,值得临床继续关注。
    Tafamidis is the world\'s first and only oral drug approved to treat the rare disease transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). Medicines are known to have different adverse reactions during the course of treatment. However, the current limited clinical studies did not identify significant adverse drug reactions to tafamidis. Tafamidis has been on the market for 5 years now, a large number of adverse drug event (ADE) reports with tafamidis as the primary suspected drug have been reported in the United Food and Drug Administration\'s adverse event reporting system (FAERS). We retrieved 8170 adverse event reports in FAERS with tafamidis as the first suspected drug, and mined these reports for positive signals to perform risk warnings for potentially possible adverse events with tafamidis. We found that a large number of adverse events associated with the primary disease were reported due to insufficient awareness of ATTR among the reporters, leading to a large number of positive signals reported in the cardiac disorders system. We also found that tafamidis has the potential to cause an adverse event risks of ear and labyrinth disorders system and urinary tract infection bacterial, which deserve continued clinical attention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)与血管生成抑制剂(AGIs)的组合已越来越多地用于癌症,迄今为止,在现实环境中,联合治疗对免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的影响尚未得到很好的阐明.
    方法:回顾性查询2014年至2022年FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,以提取被称为标准化MedDRA查询(SMQs)的irAE报告,首选术语(PT)和系统器官类别(SOC)。要进行不相称性分析,计算信息成分(IC)和报告比值比(ROR),对于IC(IC025)>0或ROR(ROR025)>1且至少3份报告的95%置信区间(CI)下限被认为具有统计学意义.
    结果:与单独的ICIs相比,ICIs+AGIs显示irAE-SMQ的IC025/ROR025较低(2.343/5.082与1.826/3.563)。关于irAE-PT,ICIs+AGIs中具有显著价值的irAE-PT少于单独的ICIs(57vs.150个PT)和ICIs+AGIs中大多数PT(88%)的较低信号值。此外,与单独使用ICIs相比,ICIs+AGIs(11/13)中大多数Es-SOCs的IC025较低。至于IRAE的结果,ICIs+AGIs对irAE-SMQ的“致命”频率低于单独的ICIs(4.88%与7.83%),所以在心脏疾病(SOC)中(15.45%vs.26.37%),和呼吸,胸部和纵隔疾病(SOC)(13.74%vs.20.06%)。同样,与ICIs+CT相比,ICIs+AGIs+化疗(CT)中的irAE发生率更低,病死率更低.
    结论:无论是否使用CT,与单独使用ICIs相比,ICIs联合AGIs可降低大多数irAE的发生率和死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (AGIs) has become increasingly used for cancers, the impact of combination therapy on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in real-world settings has not been well elucidated to date.
    METHODS: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2014 to 2022 was retrospectively queried to extract reports of irAEs referred as standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs), preferred terms (PTs) and system organ classes (SOCs). To perform disproportionality analysis, information component (IC) and reporting odds ratio (ROR) were calculated and lower limit of 95 % confidence interval (CI) for IC (IC025) > 0 or ROR (ROR025) > 1 with at least 3 reports was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: Compared to ICIs alone, ICIs + AGIs demonstrated a lower IC025/ROR025 for irAEs-SMQ (2.343/5.082 vs. 1.826/3.563). Regarding irAEs-PTs, there were fewer irAEs-PTs of significant value in ICIs + AGIs than ICIs alone (57 vs. 150 PTs) and lower signal value for most PTs (88 %) in ICIs + AGIs. Moreover, lower IC025 for most of irAEs-SOCs in ICIs + AGIs (11/13) compared with ICIs alone was observed. As for outcomes of irAEs, ICIs + AGIs showed a lower frequency of \"fatal\" for irAEs-SMQ than ICIs alone (4.88 % vs. 7.83 %), so as in cardiac disorder (SOC) (15.45 % vs. 26.37 %), and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (SOC) (13.74 % vs. 20.06 %). Similarly, there were lower occurrence and fewer fatality of irAEs in ICIs + AGIs + chemotherapy (CT) than ICIs + CT.
    CONCLUSIONS: ICIs combined with AGIs may reduce incidence and mortality for most of irAEs compared to ICIs alone whether or not with CT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,世界范围内经常发生各种流行病,如COVID-19、猴痘、流感,还有其他人,诊断为各种类型肿瘤的新患者数量有所增加。传统药物对新出现的传染病的有效性有限,肿瘤,和自身免疫性疾病。然而,随着杂交瘤技术的出现,单克隆抗体已得到广泛的应用,抗体药物在现代医学中发挥着重要作用。单克隆抗体经历了不同的发展阶段,从小鼠来源的抗体到人-小鼠嵌合抗体,人源化抗体,最终是人类抗体。在整个过程中,它们的免疫原性逐渐下降,而它们对人类使用的安全性稳步提高。完全人类抗体是目前最安全的抗体形式,因为它们的序列都来自人类,它们不会诱导人类抗鼠抗体反应。随着基因工程技术的进步,流式细胞术与单个B细胞基因扩增技术相结合,使构建和筛选全人源单克隆抗体变得更加容易。抗体药物的发展提供了新的机遇,单克隆抗体药物市场将进一步扩大。本文综述了单克隆抗体的研究进展,并介绍了截至10月1日美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的163种单克隆抗体药物。2023年。旨在为中国单克隆抗体的开发和生产提供新的见解。
    In recent years, there has been a frequent occurrence of various epidemics worldwide such as COVID-19, monkeypox, influenza, and others additionally, there has been an increase in the number of new patients diagnosed with various types of tumors. Traditional drugs have limited effectiveness against emerging infectious diseases, tumors, and autoimmune diseases. However, with the emergence of hybridoma technology, monoclonal antibodies have achieved extensive applications and antibody drugs are playing an important role in modern medicine. Monoclonal antibodies have undergone various development stages, starting from mouse-derived antibodies to human-mouse chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, and ultimately human antibodies. Throughout this process, their immunogenicity has gradually decreased, while their safety for human use steadily increased. Fully human antibodies are currently the safest form of antibody, because their sequences all come from human sources and they do not induce human anti-murine antibody reactions. With the advance of genetic engineering technology, flow cytometry coupled to single B cell gene amplification technology has made it easier to construct and screen for fully human monoclonal antibodies. The development of antibody drugs has provided new opportunities, and the market for monoclonal antibody drugs will further expand. This article reviews the research progress of monoclonal antibodies and presents information on the 163 monoclonal antibody drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as of Oct 1st, 2023. The aim is to offer new insights for the development and production of monoclonal antibodies in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Capmatinib是一种有效的选择性间充质-上皮转化抑制剂,于2020年被批准用于治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌。由于现实世界的证据非常有限,这项研究通过FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的数据挖掘评估了卡马替尼引起的不良事件.采用四种不成比例分析方法来量化卡马替尼相关不良事件的信号。卡马替尼相关不良事件信号的差异在性别方面进行了进一步研究,年龄,体重,剂量,发病时间,大陆,和伴随的药物。共发现1518例报告和4278例卡马替尼诱导的不良事件。新的重大不良事件信号出现,比如吞咽困难,脱水,耳聋,声带麻痹,肌肉疾病,和食管狭窄.值得注意的是,在女性中观察到丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶升高的风险更高,尤其是当卡马替尼与免疫检查点抑制剂联用时.与欧洲人和亚洲人相比,美国人更容易出现外周肿胀,尤其是在65岁以上的人群中。单剂量超过400mg和亚洲人更容易发生肾功能损害和血肌酐升高。这项研究提高了对卡马替尼安全性的理解。
    Capmatinib is a potent selective mesenchymal-epithelial transition inhibitor approved in 2020 for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. As real-world evidence is very limited, this study evaluated capmatinib-induced adverse events through data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Four disproportionality analysis methods were employed to quantify the signals of capmatinib-related adverse events. The difference in capmatinib-associated adverse event signals was further investigated with respect to sex, age, weight, dose, onset time, continent, and concomitant drug. A total of 1518 reports and 4278 adverse events induced by capmatinib were identified. New significant adverse event signals emerged, such as dysphagia, dehydration, deafness, vocal cord paralysis, muscle disorder, and oesophageal stenosis. Notably, higher risk of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increases were observed in females, especially when capmatinib was combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Compared with Europeans and Asians, Americans were more likely to experience peripheral swelling, especially in people > 65 years of age. Renal impairment and increased blood creatinine were more likely to occur with single doses above 400 mg and in Asians. This study improves the understanding of safety profile of capmatinib.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Fulvestrant,作为第一个选择性雌激素受体降解剂,广泛应用于乳腺癌的内分泌治疗。然而,在现实世界中,目前缺乏氟维司群不良反应数据挖掘的相关报道。对与氟维司群相关的不良事件(AE)进行数据挖掘,并探讨导致严重AE的危险因素。为临床合理使用氟维司群提供参考。从美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中检索到与氟维司群相关的不良事件报告信息,涵盖从市场引入到2023年9月30日的时期。使用基于不成比例分析的报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比方法筛选可疑AE。对重度AE进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,探讨氟维司群严重AE的相关危险因素。共获得6947份与氟维司群相关的不良事件报告,包括5924例严重AE报告和1023例非严重AE报告。使用不成比例分析方法,总共为氟维司群确定了210个有效的AE,产品标签中未列出45个不良事件(21.43%),涉及11个系统和器官。与氟维司群相关的AE按发生频率排序,中性粒细胞减少症(325例)的报告数量最多。根据信号强度,注射部位瘙痒信号最强(ROR=658.43)。逻辑回归分析结果显示,同时使用具有极高蛋白结合(≥98%)的药物是与氟维司群相关的严重AE的独立危险因素。年龄是氟维司群相关不良事件的保护因素。氟维司群与CYP3A4酶抑制剂的共同给药与严重AE的发生没有统计学上的显着相关性。共同施用具有极高蛋白质结合(≥98%)的药物可能会增加氟维司群严重不良反应的风险。同时,年龄(60-74岁)可降低氟维司群严重AE的风险。然而,还需要进一步的临床研究来探索和验证氟维司群与高蛋白结合药物之间是否存在相互作用。
    Fulvestrant, as the first selective estrogen receptor degrader, is widely used in the endocrine treatment of breast cancer. However, in the real world, there is a lack of relevant reports on adverse reaction data mining for fulvestrant. To perform data mining on adverse events (AEs) associated with fulvestrant and explore the risk factors contributing to severe AEs, providing a reference for the rational use of fulvestrant in clinical practice. Retrieved adverse event report information associated with fulvestrant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from market introduction to September 30, 2023. Suspicious AEs were screened using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio methods based on disproportionality analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted on severe AEs to explore the risk factors associated with fulvestrant-induced severe AEs. A total of 6947 reports related to AEs associated with fulvestrant were obtained, including 5924 reports of severe AEs and 1023 reports of non-severe AEs. Using the disproportionality analysis method, a total of 210 valid AEs were identified for fulvestrant, with 45 AEs (21.43%) not listed in the product labeling, involving 11 systems and organs. The AEs associated with fulvestrant were sorted by frequency of occurrence, with neutropenia (325 cases) having the highest number of reports. By signal strength, injection site pruritus showed the strongest signal (ROR = 658.43). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that concurrent use of medications with extremely high protein binding (≥ 98%) is an independent risk factor for severe AEs associated with fulvestrant. Age served as a protective factor for fulvestrant-related AEs. The co-administration of fulvestrant with CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitors did not show statistically significant correlation with the occurrence of severe AEs. Co-administration of drugs with extremely high protein binding (≥ 98%) may increase the risk of severe adverse reactions of fulvestrant. Meanwhile, age (60-74 years) may reduce the risk of severe AEs of fulvestrant. However, further clinical research is still needed to explore and verify whether there is interaction between fulvestrant and drugs with high protein binding through more clinical studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着其在血小板减少症治疗中的应用越来越多,avatrombopag的相关不良事件(AE)对其临床应用提出了重大挑战。本研究旨在通过使用真实世界的证据来全面研究与avatrombopag相关的AE。我们在美国食品和药物管理局的不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中策划了从2018年第一季度到2023年第四季度的avatrombopag的AE报告。使用用于首选术语和系统器官类别的监管活动的医学词典对AE进行编码。报告的赔率比,比例报告比率,贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络,和多项目Gamma-PoissonShrinker用于研究avatrombopag与AE报告之间的关系。在FAERS数据库中的9,060,312例报告病例中,1211份报告将avatrombopag列为“主要可疑”药物。不相称性分析确定了17个器官系统中的44个首选项符合四种算法中至少一种的标准。最常报告的不良事件是血小板计数减少(20.2%),头痛(16.7%),血小板计数增加(11.9%),血小板计数异常(6.3%),挫伤(2.7%),肺栓塞(2.3%),深静脉血栓形成(2.1%)。意外的不良事件,如季节性过敏,鼻漏,抗磷脂综合征,耳朵不适,并且还观察到了光视。排除其他严重后果,住院(34.6%)是最常见的严重结局,其次是死亡(15.4%)。大多数报告的不良事件发生在开始avatrombopag治疗的前2天内,中位发病时间为60天。我们通过临床使用avatrombopag确定了新的和意外的AE,我们的结果可能为临床监测和识别与avatrombopag相关的风险提供有价值的信息。
    With its increasing use in the treatment of thrombocytopenia, avatrombopag\'s associated adverse events (AEs) pose a major challenge to its clinical application. This study aims to comprehensively study AEs associated with avatrombopag by using real-world evidence. We curated AE reports for avatrombopag from the first quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023 in the US Food and Drug Administration\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities of Preferred Terms and System Organ Classes. The reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker were used to investigate the relationship between avatrombopag and AE reports. Among 9,060,312 reported cases in the FAERS database, 1211 reports listed avatrombopag as \"primary suspected\" drug. Disproportionality analysis identified 44 preferred terms across 17 organ systems met the criteria for at least one of the four algorithms. The most commonly reported AEs were platelet count decreased (20.2%), headache (16.7%), platelet count increased (11.9%), platelet count abnormal (6.3%), contusion (2.7%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%), and deep vein thrombosis (2.1%). Unexpected AEs such as seasonal allergy, rhinorrhea, antiphospholipid syndrome, ear discomfort, and photopsia were also observed. Excluding the other serious outcomes, hospitalization (34.6%) was the most frequently reported serious outcome, followed by death (15.4%). Most reported AEs occurred within the first 2 days of initiating avatrombopag therapy, and the median onset time was 60 days. We identified new and unexpected AEs with clinical use of avatrombopag, and our results may provide valuable information for clinical monitoring and identifying risks associated with avatrombopag.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在基于FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,对维拉佐酮的临床应用安全性进行详尽评估,并揭示与其使用相关的潜在不良事件(AE)风险。
    方法:这项研究采用了FAERS数据库中2011年第一季度至2023年第三季度的数据。各种信号检测方法,包括报告赔率比(ROR),比例报告比率(PRR),贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN),和经验贝叶斯几何均值(EBGM),用于确定维拉唑酮与特定AE之间的相关性。
    结果:该研究共收集了17,439,268份药物不良事件报告,其中5375人与维拉佐酮有关。通过信号挖掘,确定了125个包含27个系统器官类别(SOC)的首选术语(PT)。研究结果表明,女性和45至65岁年龄段的患者的患病率更高。AEs的主要类别包括精神疾病,神经系统疾病,和胃肠道疾病,随着腹泻的流行,恶心,和失眠。此外,这项研究确定了新的潜在AE的稳健信号,特别是在睡眠障碍等领域(睡眠瘫痪,催眠幻觉,快速眼动睡眠异常,睡眠恐怖,终端失眠,心动过速),性功能障碍(女性性高潮障碍,性高潮异常,性唤起的障碍,自发性阴茎勃起,性高潮,性功能障碍,射精延迟),和其他症状和伤害(电击感觉,与暴力有关的症状,枪伤)。
    结论:尽管维拉佐酮在MDD的管理中具有积极的前景,与它的使用相关的AE的发现,特别是新发现的潜在风险,如睡眠和性功能障碍,临床医生必须提高警惕。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct an exhaustive evaluation of Vilazodone\'s safety in clinical application and to unearth the potential adverse event (AE) risks associated with its utilization based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
    METHODS: This research employed data spanning from the first quarter of 2011 to the third quarter of 2023 from the FAERS database. Various signal detection methodologies, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were utilized to ascertain the correlation between Vilazodone and specific AEs.
    RESULTS: The study compiled a total of 17,439,268 reports of drug AEs, out of which 5,375 were related to Vilazodone. Through signal mining, 125 Preferred Terms (PTs) encompassing 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were identified. The findings indicated a higher prevalence among females and patients within the 45 to 65 age bracket. The principal categories of AEs included Psychiatric disorders, Nervous system disorders, and Gastrointestinal disorders, with prevalent incidents of Diarrhoea, Nausea, and Insomnia. Moreover, the study identified robust signals of novel potential AEs, notably in areas such as sleep disturbances (Sleep paralysis, Hypnagogic hallucination, Rapid eye movements sleep abnormal, Sleep terror, Terminal insomnia, Tachyphrenia), sexual dysfunctions (Female orgasmic disorder, Orgasm abnormal, Disturbance in sexual arousal, Spontaneous penile erection, Anorgasmia, Sexual dysfunction, Ejaculation delayed), and other symptoms and injuries (Electric shock sensation, Violence-related symptom, Gun shot wound).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although Vilazodone presents a positive prospect in the management of MDD, the discovery of AEs linked to its use, particularly the newly identified potential risks such as sleep and sexual dysfunctions, necessitates heightened vigilance among clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号